https://arxiv.org/api/gpG8dL0MIsbo1hLs443+GuGEjxo 2026-06-21T20:20:22Z 5621 885 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09271v1 2024-03-14T10:47:25Z

Recently uncovered archives at the University of Franche-Comté in Besançon (France) reveal a rich history of research and teaching in physics since the Faculty of Science was first established in 1845. Here, we describe a selection of notable activities conducted by the named Chairs of Physics during the period 1845-1970. We uncover a long tradition of major contributions to physics education and research, including the production of highly regarded physics textbooks that were widely used in Europe, as well as pioneering contributions to electron diffraction and microscopy, Fourier optics, and holography. These discoveries yield valuable insights into the historical development of physics research in France, and show how even a small provincial university was able to stay up-to-date with international developments across several areas of physics.

2024-03-14T10:47:25Z John M. Dudley Jeanne Magnin Luc Froehly Jerome Salvi Pierre Verschueren Maxime Jacquot http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08637v1 2024-03-13T15:50:26Z

The self-interaction spin-2 approach to general relativity (GR) has been extremely influential in the particle physics community. Leaving no doubt regarding its heuristic value, we argue that a view of the metric field of GR as nothing but a stand-in for a self-coupling field in flat spacetime runs into a dilemma: either the view is physically incomplete in so far as it requires recourse to GR after all, or it leads to an absurd multiplication of alternative viewpoints on GR rendering any understanding of the metric field as nothing but a spin-2 field in flat spacetime unjustified.

2024-03-13T15:50:26Z Philosophy of Science, Volume 90, Issue 5, December 2023, pp. 1363-1373 Niels Linnemann Chris Smeenk Mark Robert Baker 10.1017/psa.2023.56 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10969v3 2024-03-13T00:38:56Z

We show that Bell correlations may arise as a special sort of selection artefact, produced by ordinary control of the initial state of the experiments concerned. This accounts for nonlocality, without recourse to any direct spacelike causality or influence. The argument improves an earlier proposal in (arXiv:2101.05370v4 [quant-ph], arXiv:2212.06986 [quant-ph]) in two main respects: (i) in demonstrating its application in a real Bell experiment; and (ii) in avoiding the need for a postulate of retrocausality. This version includes an Appendix, discussing the relation of the proposal to the conclusions of Wood and Spekkens (arXiv:1208.4119 [quant-ph]).

2023-09-19T23:50:45Z 26 pages, 6 figures; this version adds an Appendix discussing the relation of the proposal to the conclusions of Wood and Spekkens (arXiv:1208.4119 [quant-ph]) Huw Price Ken Wharton http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.04873v2 2024-03-11T20:34:36Z

Starting from general considerations, some ideas of the philosopher Derek Parfit on consciousness, self-awareness, and reductionism are briefly reviewed and critically examined from the standpoint of physics.

2021-09-09T16:37:01Z 6 pages, minor correction in the last paragraph Luiz Carlos Ryff http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08691v2 2024-03-11T16:19:58Z

The blackbody spectrum "half-power points" are used to assign effective Q "quality factor" values that are found to be less than unity whether frequency or wavelength scaling is used. A comparison with values for coherent oscillators is made. This exercise blends two of Kirchhoff's interests, and is instructive in its own right, as it bridges the often mutually exclusive engineering and scientific disciplines.

2024-02-09T21:42:12Z Arthur Ballato John Ballato http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06690v1 2024-03-11T13:05:08Z

The early history of string theory is marked by a shift from strong interaction physics to quantum gravity. The first string models and associated theoretical framework were formulated in the late 1960s and early 1970s in the context of the S-matrix program for the strong interactions. In the mid-1970s, the models were reinterpreted as a potential theory unifying the four fundamental forces. This paper provides a historical analysis of how string theory was developed out of S-matrix physics, aiming to clarify how modern string theory, as a theory detached from experimental data, grew out of an S-matrix program that was strongly dependent upon observable quantities. Surprisingly, the theoretical practice of physicists already turned away from experiment before string theory was recast as a potential unified quantum gravity theory. With the formulation of dual resonance models (the "hadronic string theory"), physicists were able to determine almost all of the models' parameters on the basis of theoretical reasoning. It was this commitment to "non-arbitrariness", i.e., a lack of free parameters in the theory, that initially drove string theorists away from experimental input, and not the practical inaccessibility of experimental data in the context of quantum gravity physics. This is an important observation when assessing the role of experimental data in string theory.

2024-03-11T13:05:08Z To appear in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 104 (2024), 130-149 Robert van Leeuwen 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.12.011 http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06584v1 2024-03-11T10:30:09Z

Recent philosophical discussions about metaphysical indeterminacy have been substantiated with the idea that quantum mechanics, one of the most successful physical theories in the history of science, provides explicit instances of worldly indefiniteness. Against this background, several philosophers underline that there are alternative formulations of quantum theory in which such indeterminacy has no room and plays no role. A typical example is Bohmian mechanics in virtue of its clear particle ontology. Contrary to these latter claims, this paper aims at showing that different pilot-wave theories do in fact instantiate diverse forms of metaphysical indeterminacy. Namely, I argue that there are various questions about worldly states of affairs that cannot be determined by looking exclusively at their ontologies and dynamical laws. Moreover, it will be claimed that Bohmian mechanics generates a new form of modal indeterminacy. Finally, it will be concluded that ontological clarity and indeterminacy are not mutually exclusive, i.e., the two can coexist in the same theory.

2024-03-11T10:30:09Z Accepted for publication in the European Journal for Philosophy of Science Andrea Oldofredi 10.1007/s13194-024-00574-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06038v1 2024-03-09T23:12:41Z

The bulk of this paper centers around the tension between confinement and freedom in QCD. I discuss how it can be understood heuristically as a manifestation of self-adhesive glue and how it fits within the larger contexts of energy-time uncertainty and $\textit{real virtuality}$. I discuss the possible emergence of $\textit{treeons}$ as a tangible ingredient of (at least) pure gluon $SU(3)$. I propose $\textit{flux channeling}$ as a method to address that and allied questions about triality flux numerically, and indicate how to implement it for electric and magnetic flux in material systems. That bulk is framed with broad-stroke, necessarily selective sketches of the past and possible future of strong interaction physics. At the end, I've added an expression of gratitude for my formative experience at the Erice school, in 1973.

2024-03-09T23:12:41Z Keynote speech at 2023 Majorana Summer School (Erice), also delivered elsewhere. 30 pages, 9 figures Frank Wilczek http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05516v1 2024-03-08T18:37:11Z

This paper provides an overview of work, published since the opening of the archives of the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith at the end of the twentieth century, regarding the Vatican confronting evolution in the nineteenth century. It argues that this work, considered in light of recent studies of scientific writings by Jesuit astronomers who in the seventeenth century were opposed to the ideas of Copernicus, points to interesting things yet to be learned regarding the Vatican's actions on heliocentrism. Concern for Scripture and for the fallible and consequential nature of science, together with the processes used by the Vatican in these confrontations, inevitably led to messy results in these well-known "religion and science" confrontations. Nevertheless, these confrontations suggest that what the Vatican was attempting to do in confronting evolution or heliocentrism is something that is needed in science, and something that will be done in the future, probably not by the Vatican, and probably in a fashion not less messy.

2024-03-08T18:37:11Z 27 pages, 4 figures -- For conference on "Unity & Disunity in Science: Philosophical, Historical, and Theological Perspectives (Spring 2024)", University of Notre Dame, April 4-6, 2024 Christopher M. Graney http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03776v1 2024-03-06T15:11:02Z

We give some personal reflections on the person and scientist Lars Brink and on some of his scientific achievements. Our relations to Lars are briefly described in [1] and [2], while the sources relevant for this text are summarised in [3].

2024-03-06T15:11:02Z 18 pages. Comments are welcome Bengt E. W. Nilsson Chalmers U. Tech. Björn Jonson Chalmers U. Tech. http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01534v3 2024-03-06T14:26:34Z

Most contemporary physicists hold that the local validity of special relativity (SR) within general relativity (GR) is expressed by means of an interdependent cluster of mathematical concepts, one of which is the existence of normal coordinate systems. Nonetheless, there remains conceptual work to be done with regard to this `standard story' on the local validity of SR in (a) clarifying how a network of mathematical concepts is recruited in a particular modelling context in order to account for the local validity of SR within GR, and (b) highlighting the richness and subtlety of this mode of modelling, as well as the way in which it interacts with the concept of `approximate Killing symmetry'. With this paper, we carry out this work, thereby also defending the standard story from concerns recently voiced in the philosophy of physics literature.

2023-05-02T15:42:55Z Niels Linnemann James Read Nicholas Teh http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03682v1 2024-03-06T13:08:51Z

This article advances the hypothesis that the heightened eschatological sensitivity evident among the historians writing in the 5th century and its weaker echos in the time of Charlemagne were caused by the irregularities of the the lunisolar calendar and its particular realization, the Easter calendar. The lunisolar calendar that Christians used for the calculation of the date of the Easter had a number of key periods when the cycles of the Sun and the Moon came in sync in relationship to the beginning of the count and thus produced an effect of the times repeating themselves or ending with the nearly precise astronomical repetition. It is shown that Late Antique scholars who were actively involved in the construction of the Christian history's chronology were limited in their choices by the astronomical peculiarities of the Earth-Moon system. The total conjunctions of the astronomical Solar and Lunar calendars took place, some within the 1st century CE, and the next one, in 483 CE. This was also a special year because the lunar calendar lost one day. Thus the 5th century was the time of heightened expectations of whether the calendar and the Moon's showings will repeat those that accompanied the birth of Jesus. The Full Supermoon (or whatever phase it was on December 25th, 1 BCE) may have repeated in 410 CE (the entry of Goths into Rome), in 467 CE and in 476 CE (the Fall of the Roman Empire), marking the coming of the time very similar to Jesus' birth. The Full Moon was supposed to repeat December 25th, 800 CE and in the year 1000 CE. This may have determined the setting of the biblical calendar in a way that put the birth of Christ on 5199 CE (making the year 800 CE, the year of the Full Supermoon or of its phase on December 25th, 1 BCE) a critical turning point.

2024-03-06T13:08:51Z D. N. Starostin http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15280v2 2024-03-05T20:33:00Z

The projection postulate is a description of the effect on a quantum system, assumed to be in a pure state, of a measurement of an observable with a discrete spectrum, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. It is often called "von Neumann's projection postulate" or "the Lüders rule". This paper is an examination of the versions of this postulate due to Dirac, von Neumann and Lüders. It is shown that Dirac, in 1930, proposed what is now generally known as the projection postulate. Von Neumann, in 1932, gave a different theory which only applies in special and rather unusual cases. Lüders, in 1951, rejected this theory and presented one which is the same as Dirac's. Treatments of observables with continuous spectra by both Dirac and von Neumann are criticised, and the possibility of a generalised version of the projection postulate for this case is considered. The paper concludes with a discussion of the status of the projection postulate (in its various forms) as a separate postulate (independent of the other postulates of quantum mechanics) and as a separate form of time development (in addition to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation).

2024-02-23T12:06:39Z Unfair criticism of Lüders removed Anthony Sudbery http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06504v2 2024-03-05T12:43:52Z

Algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) puts forward three "causal axioms" that aim to characterize the theory as one that implements relativistic causation: the spectrum condition, microcausality, and primitive causality. In this paper, I aim to show, in a minimally technical way, that none of them fully explains the notion of causation appropriate for AQFT because they only capture some of the desiderata for relativistic causation I state or because it is often unclear how each axiom implements its respective desideratum. After this diagnostic, I will show that a fourth condition, local primitive causality (LPC), fully characterizes relativistic causation in the sense of fulfilling all the relevant desiderata. However, it only encompasses the virtues of the other axioms because it is implied by them, as I will show from a construction by Haag and Schroer (1962). Since the conjunction of the three causal axioms implies LPC and other important results in QFT that LPC does not imply, and since LPC helps clarify some of the shortcomings of the three axioms, I advocate for a holistic interpretation of how the axioms characterize the causal structure of AQFT against the strategy in the literature to rivalize the axioms and privilege one among them.

2024-01-12T11:00:28Z Forthcoming in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Volume 104, April 2024, Pages 98-108 Francisco Calderón 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.01.006 http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02857v1 2024-03-05T10:59:04Z

A re-examination of a well-known iconographic source, the "Allegory of Sight" by Jan Brueghel the Elder and Peter Paul Rubens, reveals that one of the two telescopes depicted in the painting has a highly unusual,and until now unknown to the historians of the telescope, particularity.

2024-03-05T10:59:04Z Paolo Del Santo