https://arxiv.org/api/PYsJWaosTjY+NcA0bPo6tqeIFhI 2026-06-21T17:54:14Z 5621 855 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14891v1 2024-04-23T10:17:49Z

In orthodox Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM) bases and factorizations are considered to define quantum states and entanglement in relativistic terms. While the choice of a basis (interpreted as a measurement context) defines a state incompatible to that same state in a different basis, the choice of a factorization (interpreted as the separability of systems into sub-systems) determines wether the same state is entangled or non-entangled. Of course, this perspectival relativism with respect to reference frames and factorizations precludes not only the widespread reference to quantum particles but more generally the possibility of any rational objective account of a state of affairs in general. In turn, this impossibility ends up justifying the instrumentalist (anti-realist) approach that contemporary quantum physics has followed since the establishment of SQM during the 1930s. In contraposition, in this work, taking as a standpoint the logos categorical approach to QM -- basically, Heisenberg's matrix formulation without Dirac's projection postulate -- we provide an invariant account of bases and factorizations which allows us to to build a conceptual-operational bridge between the mathematical formalism and quantum phenomena. In this context we are able to address the set of equivalence relations which allows us to determine what is actually the same in different bases and factorizations.

2024-04-23T10:17:49Z 19 pages Christian de Ronde Raimundo Fernandez Moujan Cesar Massri http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10996v2 2024-04-20T16:11:57Z

In 1953 I heard of an experiment in 1925 by Bengt Strömgren where he observed transit times with the meridian circle at the Copenhagen University Observatory measuring the current in a photocell behind slits when a star was crossing. In 1954 just 22 years old I was given the task as a student to make first test observations with a new meridian circle of the observatory. I became fascinated by the instrument and by the importance of astrometry for astronomy. Work at four meridian circles, two in Denmark, one in Hamburg, one in Lund, and Pierre Lacroute's vision of space astrometry in France had by 1973 created the foundation for development of the Hipparcos satellite, and Gaia followed. In 2013 I proposed a successor satellite which has gained momentum especially thanks to the efforts of David Hobbs and it has a good chance to be launched by ESA about 2045. But 70 years ago, optical astrometry was considered a dying branch of astronomy, unattractive compared with astrophysics. The following growth built on the still active interest in astrometry in Europe in those years and it was supported by ESA, the European Space Agency. This review is only about astrometry where I was personally involved.

2024-02-16T15:10:43Z 48 pages, 23 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2208.09332 Astrophysics and Space Science (2024) 369:23 Erik Høg 10.48550/arXiv.2402.10996 http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12248v1 2024-04-18T15:12:52Z

We discuss the challenges that the standard (Humean and non-Humean) accounts of laws face within the framework of quantum gravity where space and time may not be fundamental. This paper identifies core (meta)physical features that cut across a number of quantum gravity approaches and formalisms and that provide seeds for articulating updated conceptions that could account for QG laws not involving any spatio-temporal notions. To this aim, we will in particular highlight the constitutive roles of quantum entanglement, quantum transition amplitudes and quantum causal histories. These features also stress the fruitful overlap between quantum gravity and quantum information theory.

2024-04-18T15:12:52Z 19 pages, 5 figures Vincent Lam Daniele Oriti http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.11386v1 2024-04-17T13:46:29Z

Among the various attempts to formulate a theory of quantum gravity, a class of approaches suggests that spacetime, as modeled by general relativity, is destined to fade away. A major issue becomes then to identify which structures may inhabit the more fundamental, non-spatiotemporal environment, as well as to explain the relationship with the higher-level spatiotemporal physics. Recently, it has been suggested that a certain understanding of functionalism is the proper tool to suitably account for the recovery of spacetime. Here the viability and usefulness of such a conceptual strategy is explored, by looking at the various levels of spacetime emergence a theory of quantum gravity is expected to deal with. Our conclusion will be that, while its viability is clear also in a quantum gravity context, the import of spacetime functionalism remains rather unsettled.

2024-04-17T13:46:29Z 20 pages Emilia Margoni Daniele Oriti http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10461v1 2024-04-16T11:01:17Z

In general relativity, the strong equivalence principle is underpinned by a geometrical interpretation of fields on spacetime: all fields and bodies probe the same geometry. This geometric interpretation implies that the parallel transport of all spacetime tensors and spinors is dictated by a single affine connection. Can something similar be said about gauge theory? Agreed, in gauge theory different symmetry groups rule the interactions of different types of charges, so we cannot expect to find the same kind of universality found in the gravitational case. Nonetheless, the parallel transport of all the fields that are charged under the same symmetry group is dictated by a single 'gauge connection', and they all transform jointly under a gauge transformation. Is this kind of 'restricted universality' as geometrically underpinned as in general relativity? Here I argue that it is. The key difference is that the gauge geometry concerns 'internal', as opposed to 'external', spaces. The gauge symmetry of the standard model is thus understood as merely the automorphism group of an internal geometric structure -- $C^3\otimes C^2\otimes C^1$ endowed with an orientation and canonical inner product -- in the same way as spacetime symmetries (such as Poincare transformations), are understood as the automorphism group of an external geometric structure (respectively, a Minkowski metric). And the Ehresmann connection can then be understood as determining parallelism for this internal geometry.

2024-04-16T11:01:17Z 27 pages, 3 page appendix, 2 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1411.3281 by other authors Henrique Gomes http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08779v1 2024-04-12T19:05:35Z

This article, the third in a series about the Russian scientist Mikhail Lomonosov (1711-1765), covers the first decade of his research at the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences, from his return from an educational his trip abroad in 1741, to the mid-1750s. Lomonosov's major focus was on the establishment of the first Russian laboratory used to introduce modern experimental chemistry and physics methods both to original research and education. The lab supported studies of the physics of colors, chemistry and physics of glasses and training of the Academy students. This article describes how Lomonosov, first an Adjunct Professor and then as a young Professor, fought to create the chemistry lab, and then to establish a broad program of experiments and tests there. The construction of laboratories to be used not just for research but also education only became widespread in the early 19th century, but Lomonosov's laboratory had a significant impact on the early development of the Academy and on Russian science.

2024-04-12T19:05:35Z 32 pages, 6 Figs; submitted for publication in "Physics in Perspective" Robert P. Crease Vladimir Shiltsev http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13064v1 2024-04-12T13:27:25Z

We explain how the disparate kinematics of quantum mechanics (finite-dimensional Hilbert space of QM) and special relativity (Minkowski spacetime from the Lorentz transformations of SR) can both be based on one principle (relativity principle). This is made possible by the axiomatic reconstruction of QM via information-theoretic principles, which has successfully recast QM as a principle theory a la SR. That is, in the quantum reconstruction program (QRP) and SR, the formalisms (Hilbert space and Lorentz transformations, respectively) are derived from empirically discovered facts (Information Invariance & Continuity and light postulate, respectively), so QM and SR are "principle theories" as defined by Einstein. While SR has a compelling fundamental principle to justify its empirically discovered fact (relativity principle), QRP has not produced a compelling fundamental principle or causal mechanism to account for its empirically discovered fact. To unify these disparate kinematics, we show how the relativity principle ("no preferred reference frame" NPRF) can also be used to justify Information Invariance & Continuity. We do this by showing that when QRP's operational notion of measurement is spatialized, Information Invariance & Continuity entails the empirically discovered fact that everyone measures the same value for Planck's constant h, regardless of their relative spatial orientations or locations (Planck postulate). Since Poincare transformations relate inertial reference frames via spatial rotations and translations as well as boosts, the relativity principle justifies the Planck postulate just like it justifies the light postulate. Essentially, NPRF + c is an adynamical global constraint over the spacetime configuration of worldtubes for bodily objects while NPRF + h is an adynamical global constraint over the distribution of quanta among those bodily objects.

2024-04-12T13:27:25Z 45 pages, 17 figures W. M. Stuckey Michael Silberstein Timothy McDevitt http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07088v1 2024-04-10T15:25:02Z

Even though many of the experiments leading to the standard model of particle physics were done at large accelerator laboratories in the US and at CERN[1] many exciting developments happened in smaller national facilities all over the world. In this report we highlight the history of accelerator facilities in Sweden which was home to the highest-energy cyclotron in Europe for some time in the early 1950s. [1] For a brief history of this story see: V. Ziemann, Beams -- the Story of Particle Accelerators and the Science they Discover, Copernicus books, Springer 2024.

2024-04-10T15:25:02Z 10 pages Volker Ziemann http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06366v1 2024-04-09T15:03:10Z

In this note, we discuss a historical point regarding Schrödinger's discovery of the famous quantum wave equation in 1926 following de Broglie's fundamental works published in 1923-1925 regarding the introduction of matter waves. Drawing on the work of historians and personal analysis, we show that de Broglie was very close to the discovery of the Schrödinger equation (at least for the stationary one-electron problem).

2024-04-09T15:03:10Z submitted for a special issue of the Annals of the Foundation Louis de Broglie Aurélien Drezet http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05376v1 2024-04-08T10:32:28Z

In the Occhialini-Dilworth Archives of the University of Milan are preserved four typescripts by E. Amaldi, dealing with F.G. Houtermans, German physicist, who fled to the USSR to escape the Nazis. During a Stalinist purge he was arrested. The typescripts were sent to the two Milanese physicists so that they might give a judgement. G.S. Occhialini and C. Dilworth, in fact, had personally met Houtermans in 1934 and in 1950. The scenario is that of the role of nuclear physicists during the WW2. The exchange of letters between Amaldi and the two Milanese physicists will be analysed in order to identify possible influences on Amaldi. I will highlight Dilworth's contribution, which found room in a chapter of Amaldi's biography of Houtermans.

2024-04-08T10:32:28Z Pasquale Tucci http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14995v2 2024-04-08T06:21:53Z

The Majorana transformation makes it possible to reduce the Thomas-Fermi equation to a first-order differential equation. This reduction is possible due to the special scaling property of the Thomas-Fermi equation under homology transformations. Such reductions are well known in the context of stellar astrophysics, where the use of homology-invariant variables has long proved useful. We use homology-invariant variables in the context of the Thomas-Fermi equation to demystify the origin of the otherwise mysterious Majorana transformation.

2023-04-08T07:02:55Z 8 pages, no figures, published version Modern Physics Letters A 39, No. 07, 2450016 (2024) Abdaljalel Alizzi Zurab K. Silagadze 10.1142/S0217732324500160 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03287v3 2024-04-04T14:43:29Z

This review examines complexity science in Heliophysics, describing it not as a discipline, but as a paradigm. In the context of Heliophysics, complexity science is the study of a star, interplanetary environment, magnetosphere, upper and terrestrial atmospheres, and planetary surface as interacting subsystems. Complexity science studies entities in a system (e.g., electrons in an atom, planets in a solar system, individuals in a society) and their interactions, and is the nature of what emerges from these interactions. It is a paradigm that employs systems approaches and is inherently multi- and cross-scale. Heliophysics processes span at least 15 orders of magnitude in space and another 15 in time, and its reaches go well beyond our own solar system and Earth's space environment to touch planetary, exoplanetary, and astrophysical domains. It is an uncommon domain within which to explore complexity science. This review article excavates the lived and living history of complexity science in Heliophysics. It identifies five dimensions of complexity science. It then proceeds in three epochal parts: 1) A pivotal year in the Complexity Heliophysics paradigm: 1996; 2) The transitional years that established foundations of the paradigm (1996-2010); and 3) The emergent literature largely beyond 2010. The history reveals a grand challenge that confronts most physical sciences to understand the research intersection between fundamental science (e.g., complexity science) and applied science (e.g., artificial intelligence and machine learning). A risk science framework is suggested as a way of formulating the challenges in a way that the two converge. The intention is to provide inspiration and guide future research. It will be instructive to Heliophysics researchers, but also to any reader interested in or hoping to advance the frontier of systems and complexity science.

2023-07-06T20:49:23Z arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:astro-ph/0007086 by other authors Ryan M. McGranaghan http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08560v1 2024-04-04T12:10:45Z

We consider the angle in mathematics and arrive at a conclusion that there are two concepts on the issue. One is a descriptive geometrical one, while the other is from functional analysis. They are somewhat different, allow for different options, and both are legitimate and in use. Their difference may cause certain confusions. While the `geometrical angle' allows for different choice of units, the `functional angle' is a purely dimensionless one, being related to the angle in radians. We consider possible options to resolve the problem as it concerns the units.

2024-04-04T12:10:45Z Savely G. Karshenboim http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06113v2 2024-04-04T06:52:03Z

Seventy-five years ago, Bernardo Dessau passed away. He had been the sole professor of Physics at the University of Perugia for thirty years. With this brief contribution we intend to repay a debt of gratitude, first of all because his scientific merits were probably underestimated, having spent the first fifteen years of his career under the shadow of the great Augusto Righi in Bologna, where he also witnessed meetings with the young Marconi. He was then relegated to the Faculty of Medicine of Perugia, without a real laboratory, disregarded by the national scientific community and unable to move to better equipped locations. Nevertheless, he proved to be a gifted teacher and popularizer of science. He published a comprehensive three-volume physics textbook that was widely used in Italy and abroad. Despite becoming an Italian citizen in 1894, Dessau's German origins led to his suspension from service during World War I. Furthermore, his Jewish identity made him a target of Nazi-fascist antisemitism. He was dismissed from both the University of Perugia and from the Italian Society of Physics, of which he had been a member since its beginning, fortunately escaping deportation.

2024-03-10T07:11:27Z in Italian language. Accettato per la pubblicazione e in corso di stampa sulla rivista: Quaderni di Storia della Fisica della Societa' Italiana di Fisica Quaderni di Storia della Fisica della SIF, n.31, pp. 33-65 (2024) Giovanni Carlotti University of Perugia, Italia 10.1393/qsf/i2024-10126-x. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01458v1 2024-04-01T20:12:35Z

The Milky Way's name and role in ancient Egyptian culture remain unclear. One suggestion is that the Milky Way may have been a celestial depiction of the sky goddess Nut. In this work, I test this association using an interdisciplinary approach. In the first part of this paper, I combine astronomical simulations of the ancient Egyptian night sky with primary Egyptian sources to map the goddess Nut onto the Milky Way. With her head and groin firmly associated by primary texts with the western and eastern horizons, respectively, I argue that the summer and winter orientations of the Milky Way could be construed as figurative markers of Nut's torso (or backbone) and her arms, respectively. In the second part of this paper, I situate Nut within the global, multicultural mythology of the Milky Way. Specifically, I show that Nut's roles in the afterlife and the autumn bird migration are consistent with similar roles attributed to the Milky Way by other cultures. Finally, I show that Nut's identification with the Milky Way may even have echoes in contemporary African conceptions of the Galaxy.

2024-04-01T20:12:35Z 18 pages, 7 figures, preprint of paper published in Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage Or Graur 10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2024.01.02