https://arxiv.org/api/sH/HDbUuKWYHCwwvAPR/2X/DIQI 2026-06-21T15:38:22Z 5621 825 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16769v2 Tracing quantum correlations back to collective interferences 2024-06-03T05:04:10Z In this paper, we investigate the possibility of explaining nonclassical correlations between two quantum systems in terms of quantum interferences between collective states of the two systems. We achieve this by mapping the relations between different measurement contexts in the product Hilbert space of a pair of two-level systems onto an analogous sequence of interferences between paths in a single-particle interferometer. The relations between different measurement outcomes are then traced to the distribution of probability currents in the interferometer, where paradoxical relations between the outcomes are identified with currents connecting two states that are orthogonal and should therefore exclude each other. We show that the relation between probability currents and correlations can be represented by continuous conditional (quasi)probability currents through the interferometer, given by weak values; the violation of the noncontextual assumption is expressed by negative conditional currents in some of the paths. Since negative conditional currents correspond to the assignment of negative conditional probabilities to measurements results in different measurement contexts, the necessity of such negative probability currents represents a failure of noncontextual local realism. Our results help to explain the meaning of nonlocal correlations in quantum mechanics, and support Feynman's claim that interference is the origin of all quantum phenomena. 2024-01-30T06:15:53Z 10 pages, 4 figures New J. Phys. 26 063021 (2024) Ming Ji Jonte R. Hance Holger F. Hofmann 10.1088/1367-2630/ad5619 http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19973v1 A Triumvirate of AI Driven Theoretical Discovery 2024-05-30T11:57:00Z Recent years have seen the dramatic rise of the usage of AI algorithms in pure mathematics and fundamental sciences such as theoretical physics. This is perhaps counter-intuitive since mathematical sciences require the rigorous definitions, derivations, and proofs, in contrast to the experimental sciences which rely on the modelling of data with error-bars. In this Perspective, we categorize the approaches to mathematical discovery as "top-down", "bottom-up" and "meta-mathematics", as inspired by historical examples. We review some of the progress over the last few years, comparing and contrasting both the advances and the short-comings in each approach. We argue that while the theorist is in no way in danger of being replaced by AI in the near future, the hybrid of human expertise and AI algorithms will become an integral part of theoretical discovery. 2024-05-30T11:57:00Z 14 pages, under consideration for Nature Review Physics nature reviews physics Aug 5, 2024 Yang-Hui He 10.1038/s42254-024-00740-1 http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16957v2 Jan Veth's paintings of Jacobus Kapteyn 2024-05-29T08:19:54Z Jacobus C. Kapteyn is regarded as one of the coryfees of the University of Groningen. Part of his legacy is two paintings of him by Dutch painter Jan Pieter Veth. One, showing him at his desk, decorates the Kapteyn Room in the Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, and the other one, displaying him in academic attire, is in the University's gallery of professors in the central Academy Building. The first was offered to the Kapteyns on the occasion of his 40-th anniversary as professor in 1918 and the second to the University after his retirement in 1921. It has been suggested that there must have been a third portrait that now is lost. Former director Adriaan Blaauw has proposed that the one in the Academy Building actually was first offered in 1918, but at Mrs. Kapteyn's request replaced by the one now in the Kapteyn Room. The first version was then later adapted to the requirements of the gallery of professors by Veth himself by overpainting it with academic attire. A preliminary trial version by Veth, in the possession of Kapteyn's greatgrandson, shows what it would have looked like before the adaption. The following reports on new evidence: the biography of Jan Veth that historian Johan Huizinga, friend of Veth, wrote, and letters Veth wrote to his wife while he was working on these paintings. This provides strong support of Blaauw's sequence of events with a few modifications. No third painting has ever been produced. 2024-05-27T08:52:56Z This paper has been submitted for publication to the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage. It has 14 figures, some of them illustrating paintings by Veth. A version with high-resolution figures is available at www.astro.rug.nl/~vdkruit/Veth.pdf Pieter C. van der Kruit http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14912v1 Refractive index for the mechanical refraction of a relativistic particle 2024-05-23T12:58:24Z We have analytically determined the refractive index for the mechanical refraction of a relativistic particle for its all possible speeds. We have critically analysed the importance of Descartes' metaphysical theory and extended it in this regard. We have considered the conservation of the tangential component of the relativistic momentum and the relativistic energy of the particle in the process of the mechanical refraction within the optical-mechanical analogy. Our result for the mechanical refractive index exactly matches with the forms of both the Fermat's result on Snell's law of optical refraction at the ultra-relativistic limit and the Descartes' metaphysical result on the pseudo-Snell law of optical refraction at the non-relativistic limit. 2024-05-23T12:58:24Z 8 pages, 2 figures. Published in European Physical Journal D Eur. Phys. J. D 78, 60 (2024) Bikram Keshari Behera Surendra Kumar Gour Shyamal Biswas 10.1140/epjd/s10053-024-00849-z http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.09508v4 Quantum Mechanical Foundations of Epistemology 2024-05-22T16:24:46Z Scholars of the history and philosophy of science have asked what would decolonized science would look like. This paper develops an answer by interrogating the assumption that observations need to be recorded and communicated using the language of classical physics. Niels Bohr held this assumption even though he recognized the fact that quantum phenomena cannot be analyzed on classical lines. Classical analysis requires the objectification of whatever is being observed so that it can be objectively described. Inherent in this analysis is the intellectual creation of a transcendental verity, a view from nowhere. In contrast, knowledge systems that predate European colonialism make use of the quantum nature of nature without constructing an objective model of it. This paper concludes that uncolonized knowledge systems differ from classical ones in that they are epistemically plural, accepting multiple true observations of the same phenomenon. 2017-08-24T13:44:39Z Reconceptualization with major revisions. 33 pages Bruce Levinson http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08501v1 Foundational Issues in Group Field Theory 2024-05-22T08:10:55Z In this paper I offer an introduction to group field theory (GFT) and to some of the issues affecting the foundations of this approach to quantum gravity. I first introduce covariant GFT as the theory that one obtains by interpreting the amplitudes of certain spin foam models as Feynman amplitudes in a perturbative expansion. However, I argue that it is unclear that this definition of GFTs amounts to something beyond a computational rule for finding these transition amplitudes and that GFT doesn't seem able to offer any new insight into the foundations of quantum gravity. Then, I move to another formulation of GFT which I call canonical GFT and which uses the standard structures of quantum mechanics. This formulation is of extended use in cosmological applications of GFT, but I argue that it is only heuristically connected with the covariant version and spin foam models. Moreover, I argue that this approach is affected by a version of the problem of time which raises worries about its viability. Therefore, I conclude that there are serious concerns about the justification and interpretation of GFT in either version of it. 2024-05-22T08:10:55Z Found Phys 54, 33 (2024) Álvaro Mozota Frauca 10.1007/s10701-024-00763-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13421v1 Positivism in Newtonian Mechanics: The Ousia or a Historical Liability? 2024-05-22T08:00:27Z The positivistic assumptions of determinism and objectivism in the realm of Newtonian mechanics are questioned in this paper. While objectivism is only challenged through proposing the mildest form of subjectivism, determinism is structurally disputed by proposing that the physical reality, at least in the examples discussed, is, in essence, probabilistic and unpredictable. It is discussed that the physical reality and experimenter's identification of it could basically have inconsistent characteristics, and the study of the physical reality can therefore be conducted in ontic and epistemic levels, leading to two distinct identifications. Four scientific topics, showing two different types of indeterminacy, are introduced and briefly reviewed: chaotic systems, turbulence, fluid transport in porous media, and hydromechanics of fractures. It is proposed that determinism is only meaningful in epistemic level, the first two examples are ontically indeterministic, the last two examples are epistemically indeterministic, and more examples of indeterministic phenomena could, most likely, be found in the nature. Indeterminacy of the physical reality, it is discussed, has always been considered in engineering design processes and such effects have normally been covered through safety factors and feedback loops. By reviewing Hadamard's well-posedness criteria, Poincae's complete deterministic approach, and Leibniz's principles of sufficient reason and identity of indiscernibles, it is claimed that positivism stands on Leibniz's metaphysical assumptions, which are not necessarily in full agreement with the physical reality. A few suggestions for a path beyond positivism in Newtonian mechanics are finally provided. 2024-05-22T08:00:27Z Seyed Mohammad Rezaei Niya http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04203v2 Quantum mechanical rules for observed observers and the consistency of quantum theory 2024-05-20T18:00:02Z I argue that the rules of unitary quantum mechanics imply that observers who will themselves be subject to measurements in a linear combination of macroscopic states (``cat" measurements) cannot make reliable predictions on the results of experiments performed after such measurements. This lifts the inconsistency in the interpretation of quantum mechanics recently identified by Frauchiger and Renner. The Born rules for calculating the probability of outcomes and for communicating with other observers do not generally apply for cat-measured observers, nor can they generally be amended to incorporate upcoming cat measurements. Quantum mechanical rules completed with these conditions become fully consistent. 2022-02-09T00:05:20Z Substantially expanded version published in Nature Communications; 15 pages, no figures Nature Communications 15, 3023 (2024) Alexios P. Polychronakos 10.1038/s41467-024-47170-2 http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14474v2 Cosmic-Ray Physics at the South Pole 2024-05-17T22:36:13Z The geographic South Pole provides unique opportunities to study cosmic particles in the Southern Hemisphere. It represents an optimal location to deploy large-scale neutrino telescopes in the deep Antarctic ice, such as AMANDA or IceCube. In both cases, the presence of an array, constructed to observe extensive air showers, enables hybrid measurements of cosmic rays. While additional neutron monitors can provide information on solar cosmic rays, large detector arrays, like SPASE or IceTop, allow for precise measurements of cosmic rays with energies above several $100\,\rm{TeV}$. In coincidence with the signals recorded in the deep ice, which are mostly due to the high-energy muons produced in air showers, this hybrid detector setup provides important information about the nature of cosmic rays. In this review, we will discuss the historical motivation and developments towards measurements of cosmic rays at the geographic South Pole and highlight recent results reported by the IceCube Collaboration. We will emphasize the important contributions by Thomas K. Gaisser and his colleagues that ultimately led to the rich Antarctic research program which today provides crucial insights into cosmic-ray physics. 2023-11-24T13:27:00Z 21 pages, 21 figures D. Soldin P. A. Evenson H. Kolanoski A. A. Watson http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12954v3 Finite frequentism explains quantum probability 2024-05-17T13:55:08Z I show that frequentism, as an explanation of probability in classical statistical mechanics, can be extended in a natural way to a decoherent quantum history space, the analogue of a classical phase space. The result is a form of finite frequentism, in which the Gibbs concept of an infinite ensemble of gases is replaced by the quantum state expressed as a superposition of a finite number of decohering microstates. It is a form of finite and actual (as opposed to hypothetical) frequentism insofar as all the microstates exist, even though they may differ macroscopically, in keeping with the decoherence-based Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics. 2024-04-19T15:37:02Z 29 pages, 4 figures Simon Saunders http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09703v1 Diffeomorphism invariance and general covariance: a pedagogical introduction 2024-05-15T21:05:42Z Diffeomorphism invariance is a feature that gets sometimes highlighted as something with profound implications in the physics of spacetime. Moreover, it is often wrongly associated exclusively with General Relativity. The fact that diffeomorphism invariance and general covariance are used interchangeably does not help. Here, we attempt at clarifying these concepts. 2024-05-15T21:05:42Z 6 pages, 3 figures, informal style Mateo Casariego http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08722v1 Bohr and von Neumann on the Universality of Quantum Mechanics: Materials for the History of the Quantum Measurement Process 2024-05-13T13:04:22Z The Bohr and von Neumann views on the measurement process in quantum mechanics have been interpreted for a long time in somewhat controversial terms, often leading to misconceptions. On the basis of some textual analysis, I would like to show that, contrary to a widespread opinion, their views should be taken less inconsistent, and much closer to each other, than usually thought. As a consequence, I claim that Bohr and von Neumann are conceptually on the same side on the issue of the universality of quantum mechanics: hopefully, this might contribute to a more accurate history of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. 2024-05-13T13:04:22Z Federico Laudisa http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06310v1 The Discovery of Neptune Revisited 2024-05-10T08:34:18Z The study of the differences detected between the observed and the predicted positions of Uranus taking only the ancient planets into account led to the discovery of planet Neptune in 1846. This event remains one of the best accomplishments ever achieved in the history of Astronomy and Classical Mechanics. In this paper, we study the perturbations in the orbit of Uranus due to Neptune and its effects from a modern numerical point of view of the $N$-body problem. The effects induced by Pluto in the orbit of Neptune, as the historical search for a ninth planet in the Solar System (recently boostered again with the hypothesis of the so-called Planet Nine) back in the days was propelled by some supposed small inconsistencies in the orbit of the ice giants, are also analyzed. 2024-05-10T08:34:18Z Article is being prepared for submission to Astronomy & Astrophysics Gabriel Rodríguez-Moris José A. Docobo http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13275v3 Does quantum mechanics require "conspiracy"? 2024-05-09T20:04:37Z Quantum states containing records of incompatible outcomes of quantum measurements are valid states in the tensor-product Hilbert space. Since they contain false records, they conflict with the Born rule and with our observations. I show that excluding them requires a fine-tuning to an extremely restricted subspace of the Hilbert space that seems "conspiratorial", in the sense that (1) it seems to depend on future events that involve records (including measurement settings) and on the dynamical law (normally thought to be independent of the initial conditions), and (2) it violates Statistical Independence, even when it is valid in the context of Bell's theorem. To solve the puzzle, I build a model in which, by changing the dynamical law, the same initial conditions can lead to different histories in which the validity of records is relative to the new dynamical law. This relative validity of the records may restore causality, but the initial conditions still must depend, at least partially, on the dynamical law. While violations of Statistical Independence are often seen as non-scientific, they turn out to be needed to ensure the validity of records and our own memories and, by this, of science itself. A Past Hypothesis is needed to ensure the existence of records and turns out to require violations of Statistical Independence. It is not excluded that its explanation, still unknown, ensures such violations in the way needed by local interpretations of quantum mechanics. I suggest that an as-yet unknown law or superselection rule may restrict the full tensor-product Hilbert space to the very special subspace required by the validity of records and the Past Hypothesis. 2022-09-27T09:40:58Z 10 pages. Accepted version Entropy 26, no. 5 (2024): 411 Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica 10.3390/e26050411 http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05756v1 Everything is Entangled in Quantum Mechanics: Are the Orthodox Measures Physically Meaningful? 2024-05-09T13:22:10Z Even though quantum entanglement is today's most essential concept within the new technological era of quantum information processing, we do not only lack a consistent definition of this kernel notion, we are also far from understanding its physical meaning [35]. These failures have lead to many problems when attempting to provide a consistent measure or quantification of entanglement. In fact, the two main lines of contemporary research within the orthodox literature have created mazes where inconsistencies and problems are found everywhere. While the operational-instrumentalist approach has failed to explain how inequalities are able to distinguish the classical from the quantum, the geometrical approach has failed to provide a consistent meaningful account of their entropic measure. Taking distance from orthodoxy, in this work we address the quantification and measure of quantum entanglement by considering a recently presented objective-invariant definition in terms of the coding of intensive relations [21] which allows to escape the widespread relativist account of bases and factorizations [24, 25]. Going beyond the orthodox dualistic reference to "quantum particles" and "clicks" in detectors, we will argue that this new line of research is capable not only to evade the many open problems which appear within the mainstream literature, but is also able to present a consistent and coherent physical understanding of entanglement. The main conclusion of this work is that in quantum mechanics -- contrary to what is generally presupposed -- all operational expressions found within the laboratory are intrinsically entangled. 2024-05-09T13:22:10Z arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2404.14891 Christian de Ronde Raimundo Fernandez Moujan Cesar Massri