https://arxiv.org/api/WrEs1GaMiAVdY4zjQpA6YOqncwc 2026-06-21T13:23:03Z 5621 795 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15858v1 2024-07-08T20:25:46Z

We present the observations and the results of our experience from a large number of flight hours in constructing, handling, testing, studying and interacting with our Antikythera Mechanism functional reconstruction models. We constructed our models according to the X Ray tomographies and without any use of modern stabilization parts (screws, nuts etc). Simple typical bronze material (not with special alloys) was used in the construction, while (most of) the gears were cut from simple bronze discs with thickness about 2mm and with triangular shaped teeth (not in modern involute shape). The bronze (not iron or steel) shafts have dimensions conforming to the original parts of the ancient artifact. The assembly of the parts was done following careful study of the Personal Constructional Characteristics and the Design Style of the ancient Craftsman, which are visible or even hidden on the Antikythera Mechanism Fragments. During the extensive use of our models, it was concluded that two important and mandatory indicators are missing from all current reconstructions of the Antikythera Mechanism. The absence of these two indicator dials makes it difficult to properly operate the Mechanism and their existence is necessary, in order for the Antikythera Mechanism to be considered as a complete and self contained operational time measuring device. The two procedures related to the (poorly) preserved remains were located on gear b1 and the lost Cover Disc of the b1 gear. The reconstruction of those missing parts was achieved by paying special attention to the Personal Constructional Characteristics of the ancient Craftsman. The extensive analysis of the Antikythera Mechanism calibrated scales leads to the understanding of the Mechanism as a luni solar time measuring device, as opposed to the notion that it was a mechanical planetarium presenting the hypothesized planetary motions and positions.

2024-07-08T20:25:46Z 30 pages, 18 Figures Aristeidis Voulgaris Christophoros Mouratidis Andreas Vossinakis Manos Roumeliotis http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18582v3 2024-07-08T12:10:14Z

There is solid consensus among physicists and philosophers that, in gauge field theory, for a quantity to be physically meaningful or real, it must be gauge-invariant. Yet, every "elementary" field in the Standard Model of particle physics is actually gauge-variant. This has led a number of researchers to insist that new manifestly gauge-invariant approaches must be established. Indeed, in the foundational literature, dissatisfaction with standard methods for reducing gauge symmetries has been expressed: Spontaneous symmetry breaking is deemed conceptually dubious, while gauge fixing suffers the same limitations and is subject to the same criticisms as coordinate choices in General Relativity. An alternative gauge-invariant proposal was recently introduced in the literature, the so-called "dressing field method" (DFM). It is a mathematically subtle tool, and unfortunately prone to be confused with simple gauge transformations, hence with standard gauge~fixings. As a matter of fact, in the physics literature the two are often conflated, and in the philosophy community some doubts have been raised about whether there is any substantial difference between them. Clarifying this issue is of special significance for anyone interested in both the foundational issues of gauge theories and their invariant formulation. It is thus our objective to establish as precisely as possible the technical and conceptual distinctions between the DFM and gauge fixing.

2024-04-29T10:45:14Z Philipp Berghofer Jordan François 10.1007/s10701-024-00809-y http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06218v1 2024-07-04T23:04:30Z

In the History of Ideas, a succession of philosophical and scientific achievements, concerning the concept of space and its dimensionality, were essential to contribute, after a long period, to the theoretical possibility of thinking physical time with more than one dimension. Meanwhile, such a progress brought with it the expectation that one can either understand the role of dimensionality in the World or disclose how certain physical phenomena depend on it. Some of these issues are sketched throughout the text, as well as those remarkable moments in the History of Science where important contributions were made in order to give a satisfactory answer to the following inescapable question: -- How many dimensions does time have?

2024-07-04T23:04:30Z 22 pp. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2101.12167 Francisco Caruso; Jose Geraldo Pereira; Alberto Santoro (Orgs.). Tribute to Ruben Aldrovandi. 1. ed. Sao Paulo: Livraria da Fisica, 2024 Francisco Caruso http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02421v1 2024-07-02T16:48:28Z

I show that, by the same criteria that led to Galilean and Special Relativity and gauge symmetries, there is no way to identify a unique set of observables that give the structure of space or spacetime. In some sense, space is lost in the state space itself. Moreover, the relationship between the observables and the physical properties they represent becomes relative. But we can verify that they are not relative, and the spacetime structure is unique. I show that this implies that not all structures isomorphic with observers can be observers, contradicting Structural Realism and Physicalism. This indicates a strong connection between spacetime and the sentience of the observers, as anticipated by some early contributors to Special and General Relativity.

2024-07-02T16:48:28Z 13 pages, to appear in Eric Ling and Annachiara Piubello (Eds), Spacetime 1908-2023. Selected peer-reviewed papers presented at the Third Hermann Minkowski Meeting on the Foundations of Spacetime Physics, 11-14 September 2023, Albena, Bulgaria (Minkowski Institute Press, Montreal 2024). ISBN 978-1-998902-25-5 (softcover), ISBN 978-1-998902-26-2 (ebook) In E Ling, A Piubello (Eds), "Spacetime 1908-2023" (MIP, Montreal 2024), pages 163-176. ISBN 978-1-998902-25-5 (softcover), ISBN 978-1-998902-26-2 (ebook) Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06889v3 2024-07-01T10:11:32Z

We show that the dynamical common core of the recently-discovered non-relativistic geometric trinity of gravity is Maxwell gravitation. Moreover, we explain why no analogous distinct dynamical common core exists in the case of the better-known relativistic geometric trinity of gravity.

2023-09-13T11:23:54Z Forthcoming in Philosophy of Physics Philosophy of Physics 2(1), article 15, pp. 1--20, 2024 Eleanor March William J. Wolf James Read 10.31389/pop.80 http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14223v2 2024-06-25T09:37:54Z

A 1964 paper by John Bell gave the first demonstration that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden variables. There is an ongoing and vigorous debate on whether he relied on an assumption of determinism, or instead, as he later claimed, derived determinism from assumptions of locality and perfect correlation. This paper aims to bring clarity to the debate via simple examples and rigorous results. It is shown that the weak form of locality used in Bell's 1964 paper (parameter independence) is insufficient for such a derivation, whereas an independent form called outcome independence is sufficient even when weak locality does not hold. It further follows that outcome independence, by itself, implies that standard quantum mechanics is incomplete. It is also shown that an appeal by Bell to the Einstein-Rosen-Podolsky argument to support his claim fails, via examples that expose logical gaps in this argument. However, replacing the reality criterion underpinning the argument by a stronger criterion enables a rigorous derivation of both weak locality and determinism, as required for Bell's 1964 paper. Consequences for quantum interpretations, locality, and classical common causes are briefly discussed, with reference to an example of local classical indeterminism.

2020-09-29T18:00:12Z Results extended and separated into two new articles (one focusing on Bell and the EPR argument, one focusing on outcome independence) Michael J. W. Hall http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17411v1 2024-06-25T09:33:29Z

In an attempt to understand the origin and robustness of the Boltzmann/Gibbs/Shannon entropic functional, we adopt a geometric approach and discuss the implications of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma and of Dvoretzky's theorem on convex bodies for the choice of this functional form. We contrast these results with a more recent result on flowers of balls, which may be interpreted as suggesting the use of power-law entropies for some systems.

2024-06-25T09:33:29Z 12 pages. No figures. Standard LaTeX2e Nikolaos Kalogeropoulos http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07102v1 2024-06-23T10:12:26Z

The paper discusses Carnap's claim that a proper philosophical analysis of quantum mechanics, including a determination of whether its logic has to be revised, requires a rational reconstruction of the theory. Several articulations of the notion of rational reconstruction are recalled, followed by a brief analysis of two standard criticisms of Carnap's claim. The paper suggests that adopting inferentialism overcomes both criticisms, and then considers the possibility of formulating quantum mechanics as a Carnapian language with an inferentialist semantics.

2024-06-23T10:12:26Z 10p, comments welcome! arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2310.14634 Iulian D. Toader 10.1007/978-3-031-80568-4_2 http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15932v1 2024-06-22T20:28:35Z

Teleparallel gravity shares many qualitative features with general relativity, but differs from it in the following way: whereas in general relativity, gravitation is a manifestation of space-time curvature, in teleparallel gravity, spacetime is (always) flat. Gravitational effects in this theory arise due to spacetime torsion. It is often claimed that teleparallel gravity is an equivalent reformulation of general relativity. In this paper we question that view. We argue that the theories are not equivalent, by the criterion of categorical equivalence and any stronger criterion, and that teleparallel gravity posits strictly more structure than general relativity.

2024-06-22T20:28:35Z 21 pages James Owen Weatherall Helen Meskhidze http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15837v1 2024-06-22T12:40:09Z

In recent years, criticism of the methodology of particle physics beyond the Standard Model has increased, diagnosing too much reliance on aesthetic criteria for theory development and evaluation. Faced with several decades of experimental confirmation of all theories lacking, we subject four aesthetic criteria - simplicity, symmetry, elegance, and inevitability -, regularly mentioned in theory evaluation, to critical examination. We find that these criteria, all of which can be reduced to a desire for simplicity, have repeatedly misled modern particle physics. This is largely due to the lack of metatheoretical permanence of a uniform conception of simplicity. The reductionist claim of particle physics - the search for simple fundamental principles in a complex world - will be worked out as the reason why this discipline is particularly susceptible to the aesthetic appeal of simplicity. Thus, compared to disciplines dealing with complex phenomena, aesthetic criteria are much more frequently applied, exposing particle physics to the risk of missteps and dead ends.

2024-06-22T12:40:09Z Johannes Branahl http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15706v1 2024-06-22T01:59:31Z

Peter Higgs was a British theoretical physicist, famous for his work published in 1964, where he proposed a mechanism that can generate masses for elementary particles, while respecting gauge invariance. Half a century later, two experiments at CERN confirmed that this mechanism is realized in nature. On April 8th, we received the sad news of the passing of the great pioneer of elementary particle physics. This article is dedicated to his memory, and to the mechanism and particle that bear his name. -- Peter Higgs fue un físico teórico británico, famoso por su trabajo de 1964 donde propuso un mecanismo que puede generar masas para partículas elementales, conforme a la simetría de norma. Medio siglo más tarde, dos experimentos del CERN confirmaron que este mecanismo está realizado en la naturaleza. El 8 de abril nos llegó la triste noticia del fallecimiento del gran pionero de la fisica de partículas elementales. Este artículo es dedicado a su memoria, así como al mecanismo y a la partícula que llevan su nombre.

2024-06-22T01:59:31Z 15 pages, LaTex, 13 figures, bilingual: English version to be published in Rev. Cub. Fís., Spanish version to be published in Bol. Soc. Mex. Fís Wolfgang Bietenholz José Antonio García-Hernández http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00053v2 2024-06-21T09:05:08Z

Science is about facts and truth. Yet sometimes the truth and facts are not obvious. For example, in the field of MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), there has been a long-lasting debate about who were the major contributors in its development. Particularly, there was a strong dispute between the followers of two scientists, R. Damadian and P. Lauterbur. In this review, we carefully trace the major developments in applying NMR for cancer detection starting almost 50 years ago. The research records show that the truth was beyond the claims of either research camps. The development of NMR for cancer detection involved multiple research groups, who made critical contributions at different junctures.

2024-04-17T08:41:10Z 13 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables; This work was reported in the 2024 APS March Meeting held at Minneapolis as an invited talk given in Session S43: Physics, History, and Future of MRI Donald C. Chang http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07337v2 2024-06-20T13:05:48Z

We present a detailed analysis of Penrose's gravito-optical analogy between the focusing effects of particular families of Ricci- and Weyl-curved spacetime regions on the one hand, and anastigmatic and astigmatic optical lenses on the other. We put the analogy in its historical context, investigate its underlying assumptions, its range of validity, its proof of concept, and its application in Penrose's study of the notion of energy flux in general relativity. Finally, we examine the analogy within the framework of Norton's material theory of induction.

2023-10-11T09:36:04Z 30 pages, 2 figures, minor correction, reference removed (published version) Philosophy of Physics, 2(1), id.4, 2024 Dennis Lehmkuhl Christian Röken Juliusz Doboszewski 10.31389/pop.54 http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.01426v4 2024-06-20T10:25:02Z

To admit a canonically conjugate time operator, the Hamiltonian has to be a generator of translations (like the momentum operator generates translations in space), so its spectrum must be unbounded. But the Hamiltonian governing our world is thought to be bounded from below. Also, judging by the number of fields and parameters of the Standard Model, the Hamiltonian seems much more complicated. In this article I give examples of worlds governed by Hamiltonians generating translations. They can be expressed as a partial derivative operator just like the momentum operator, but when expressed in function of other observables they can exhibit any level of complexity. The examples include any quantum world realizing a standard ideal measurement, any quantum world containing a clock or a free massless fermion, the quantum representation of any deterministic time-reversible dynamical system without time loops, and any quantum world that cannot return to a past state. Such worlds are as sophisticated as our world, but they admit a time operator. I show that, despite having unbounded Hamiltonian, they do not decay to infinite negative energy any more than any quantum or classical world. Since two such quantum systems of the same Hilbert space dimension are unitarily equivalent even if the physical content of their observables is very different, they are concrete counterexamples to Hilbert Space Fundamentalism (HSF). Taking the observables into account removes the ambiguity of HSF and the clock ambiguity problem attributed to the Page-Wootters formalism, also caused by assuming HSF. These results provide additional motivations to restore the spacetime symmetry in the formulation of Quantum Mechanics and for the Page-Wootters formalism.

2022-04-04T12:22:20Z Accepted version. The mathematical results are unchanged, but I added substantial explanations of the physical significance. Phys. Scr. (2024) Phys. Scr. 99 085102 (2024) Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica 10.1088/1402-4896/ad59d2 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13697v1 2024-06-20T06:01:36Z

In this article we pay tribute to Herbert Dingle for his early call to re-assess special relativity from philosophical and logical perspectives. However, we disagree with Dingle about a number of issues particularly his failure to distinguish between the scientific essence of special relativity (as represented by the experimentally-supported Lorentz transformations and their formal implications and consequences which we call "the mechanics of Lorentz transformations") and the logically inconsistent interpretation of Einstein (which is largely based on the philosophical and epistemological views of Poincare). We also disagree with him about his manner and attitude which he adopted in his campaign against special relativity although we generally agree with him about the necessity of impartiality of the scientific community and the scientific press towards scientific theories and opinions as well as the necessity of total respect to the ethics of science and the rules of moral conduct in general.

2024-06-20T06:01:36Z 15 pages Taha Sochi