https://arxiv.org/api/WqjwHmKJygsA4TrdrOVOMcGXpOk 2026-06-21T12:28:55Z 5621 780 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16281v1 2024-07-23T08:32:08Z

In this paper, I consider a recent controversy about whether first-class constraints generate gauge transformations in the case of electromagnetism. I argue that there is a notion of gauge transformation, the extended notion, which is different from the original gauge transformation of electromagnetism, but at the same time not trivial, which allows the making of that claim. I further argue that one can expect that this claim can be extended to more general theories, and that Dirac's conjecture may be true for some physically reasonable theories and only in this sense of gauge transformation. Finally, I argue that the extended notion of gauge transformation seems unnatural from the point of view of classical theories, but that it nicely fits with the way quantum versions of gauge theories are constructed.

2024-07-23T08:32:08Z Philosophy of Physics, 2(1), p. 10 (2024) Álvaro Mozota Frauca 10.31389/pop.48. http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00354v2 2024-07-20T18:46:42Z

'Relativistic thermodynamics' should be understood not as a generalization of a non-relativistic theory but as an application of a general thermodynamic framework, neutral as to spacetime setting and allowing arbitrary conserved quantities, to the specific case of relativity. That framework gives an unambiguous result as to the thermodynamics of relativistically moving systems (an answer coinciding with Einstein's, and Planck's, original results.) Thermodynamic temperature is unambiguously defined as rate of change of energy with entropy at constant momentum; that said, its operational significance is limited and other measures of energy/entropy covariance, which incorporate momentum transfer, are often more useful.

2023-07-01T14:44:09Z 22 pages; very substantially revised from previous version Philos. sci. 92 (2025) 688-707 David Wallace 10.1017/psa.2025.9 http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15456v3 2024-07-20T16:45:03Z

Phenomena in gauge theory are often described in the physics literature via a specific choice of gauge. In foundational and philosophical discussions this is often criticized as introducing gauge dependence, and contrasted against (often aspirational) "gauge-invariant" descriptions of the physics. I argue, largely in the context of scalar electrodynamics, that this is misguided, and that descriptions of a physical process within a specific gauge are in fact gauge-invariant descriptions. However, most of them are non-local descriptions of that physics, and I suggest that this ought to be the real objection to such descriptions. I explore the unitary gauge as the exception to this nonlocality and consider its strengths and limitations, as well as (more briefly) its extension beyond scalar electrodynamics.

2024-04-23T18:58:20Z 19 pages. Minor revisions only. Forthcoming in Stud.Hist.Phil.Sci David Wallace http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14238v1 2024-07-19T12:10:24Z

The persistent challenge of formulating ontic structuralism in a rigorous manner, which prioritizes structures over the entities they contain, calls for a transformation of traditional logical frameworks. I argue that Univalent Foundations (UF), which feature the axiom that all isomorphic structures are identical, offer such a foundation and are more attractive than other proposed structuralist frameworks. Furthermore, I delve into the significance in the case of the hole argument and, very briefly, the nature of symmetries.

2024-07-19T12:10:24Z Foundation of Physics 54, 38 (2024) Lu Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14234v1 2024-07-19T12:01:22Z

Symmetries and isomorphisms play similar conceptual roles when we consider how models represent physical situations, but they are formally distinct, as two models related by symmetries are not typically isomorphic. I offer a rigorous categorical strategy that formulate symmetries as isomorphisms between models and apply it to classical electromagnetism, and evaluate its philosophical significance in relation to the recent debate between `sophistication' and `reduction'. In addition to traditional spacetime models, I also consider algebraic models, in which case we can use the method of natural operators to address the problem of ontological nonperspicuity faced by the categorical strategy. Finally, I briefly expound on the significance of symmetries as isomorphisms in the framework of Univalent Foundations, in which isomorphic structures are formally identified.

2024-07-19T12:01:22Z Lu Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13875v1 2024-07-18T19:48:41Z

I expound and defend the ``bare probabilism'' reading of Gibbsian (i.e. mainstream) statistical mechanics, responding to Frigg and Werndl's recent (BJPS 72 (2021), 105-129) plea: ``can somebody please say what Gibbsian statistical mechanics says?''

2024-07-18T19:48:41Z 17 pages David Wallace http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.03374v3 2024-07-18T15:56:54Z

We explore how one might detect the dynamical quantum Cheshire cat proposed by Aharonov et al. We show that, in practice, we need to bias the initial state by adding/subtracting a small probability amplitude (`field') of the orthogonal state, which travels with the disembodied property, to make the effect detectable (i.e. if our initial state is $|\uparrow_z\rangle$, we need to bias this with some small amount $δ$ of state $|\downarrow_z\rangle$). This biasing, which can be done either directly or via weakly entangling the state with a pointer, effectively provides a phase reference with which we can measure the evolution of the state. The outcome can then be measured as a small probability difference in detections in a mutually unbiased basis, proportional to this biasing $δ$. We show this is different from counterfactual communication, which provably does not require any probe field to travel between sender Bob and receiver Alice for communication. We further suggest an optical polarisation experiment where these phenomena might be demonstrated in a laboratory.

2022-04-07T11:50:31Z 11 pages, 4 figures. Accepted for publication at New Journal of Physics, matches accepted version New J. Phys. 26 073038 (2024) Jonte R. Hance James Ladyman John Rarity 10.1088/1367-2630/ad6476 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13197v1 2024-07-18T06:21:24Z

Are you, with your perceptions, memories and observational data, a Boltzmann brain, namely a fleeting statistical fluctuation out of the thermal equilibrium of the universe? Arguments are given in the literature claiming that this bizarre hypothesis needs to be considered seriously, that all of our data about the past is actually a mirage. We point to a difficulty in these arguments. They are based on the dynamical laws and on statistical arguments, but they disregard the fact that we infer the dynamical laws presupposing the reliability of our data records about the past. Hence the reasoning in favor of the Boltzmann brain hypothesis contradicts itself, relying on the reliability of our data about the past to conclude that that data is wrong. More broadly, it is based on incomplete evidence. Incomplete evidence notoriously leads to false conclusions.

2024-07-18T06:21:24Z 5 pages, no figures Carlo Rovelli David Wolpert http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16477v2 2024-07-15T16:18:30Z

The presence of an absorber in one of the paths of an interferometer changes the output statistics of that interferometer in a fundamental manner. Since the individual quantum particles detected at any of the outputs of the interferometer have not been absorbed, any non-trivial effect of the absorber on the distribution of these particles over these paths is a counterfactual effect. Here, we quantify counterfactual effects by evaluating the information about the presence or absence of the absorber obtained from the output statistics, distinguishing between classical and quantum counterfactual effects. We identify the counterfactual gain which quantifies the advantage of quantum counterfactual protocols over classical counterfactual protocols, and show that this counterfactual gain can be separated into two terms: a semi-classical term related to the amplitude blocked by the absorber, and a Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability assigning a joint probability to the blocked path and the output port. A negative Kirkwood-Dirac term between a path and an output port indicates that inserting the absorber into that path will have a focussing effect, increasing the probability of particles arriving at that output port, resulting in a significant enhancement of the counterfactual gain. We show that the magnitude of quantum counterfactual effects cannot be explained by a simple removal of the absorbed particles, but originates instead from a well-defined back-action effect caused by the presence of the absorber in one path, on particles in other paths.

2024-04-25T10:03:04Z 13 pages, 3 figures. Accepted for publication in Quantum Science and Technology; matches accepted version Quantum Sci. Technol. 9 045015 (2024) Jonte R. Hance Tomonori Matsushita Holger F. Hofmann 10.1088/2058-9565/ad63c7 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10033v1 2024-07-14T00:26:58Z

My personal recollections are presented regarding my interactions with Steven Weinberg and the impact he had in my career from when I was his graduate student until the present.

2024-07-14T00:26:58Z 6 pages, 1 figure. Invited contribution to a Nuclear Physics B issue honoring Steven Weinberg Nucl.Phys.B 1006 (2024) 116615 Fernando Quevedo 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116615 http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15517v2 2024-07-13T20:43:29Z

We propose several hierarchical graphs that represent the semantic relations between physical theories, their fundamental constants and units of measurement. We begin with an alternative representation of Zelmanov's cube of fundamental constants as a concept lattice. We then propose the inclusion of a new fundamental constant: Milgrom's critical acceleration and discuss the implications of such analysis. We then look for the same fundamental constants in a graph that relates magnitudes and units of measurement in the International System of Units. This exercise shows the potential of visualizing hierarchical networks as a tool to better comprehend the interrelations and dependencies of physical magnitudes, units and theories. New regimes of application may be deduced, as well as an interesting reflection on our ontologies and corresponding theoretical objects.

2024-06-21T01:11:34Z 12 pages, 9 figures, Accepted for publication in the journal Symmetry Symmetry 2024, 16(7), 899 Mariana Espinosa-Aldama Sergio Mendoza 10.3390/sym16070899 http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05703v2 2024-07-13T16:21:12Z

Today, the Ising model is an archetype describing collective ordering processes. And, as such, it is widely known in physics and far beyond. Less known is the fact that the thesis defended by Ernst Ising 100 years ago (in 1924) contained not only the solution of what we call now the `classical 1D Ising model' but also other problems. Some of these problems, as well as the method of their solution, are the subject of this note. In particular, we discuss the combinatorial method Ernst Ising used to calculate the partition function for a chain of elementary magnets. In the thermodynamic limit, this method leads to the result that the partition function is given by the roots of a certain polynomial. We explicitly show that `Ising's roots' that arise within the combinatorial treatment are also recovered by the eigenvalues of the transfer matrix, a concept that was introduced much later. Moreover, we discuss the generalization of the two-state model to a three-state one presented in Ising's thesis, but not included in his famous paper of 1925 (E. Ising, Z.Physik 31 (1925) 253). The latter model can be considered as a forerunner of the now abundant models with many-component order parameters.

2024-05-09T12:01:11Z Entropy 26 (2024) 459 Reinhard Folk Yurij Holovatch 10.3390/e26060459 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18948v1 2024-07-11T21:42:58Z

Preparing general relativity for quantization in the Hamiltonian approach leads to the `problem of time,' rendering the world fundamentally timeless. One proposed solution is the `thermal time hypothesis,' which defines time in terms of states representing systems in thermal equilibrium. On this view, time is supposed to emerge thermodynamically even in a fundamentally timeless context. Here, I develop the worry that the thermal time hypothesis requires dynamics -- and hence time -- to get off the ground, thereby running into worries of circularity.

2024-07-11T21:42:58Z Accepted for publication in the Journal for General Philosophy of Science, as part of the Special Issue: On Time in the Foundations of Physics (eds. Andrea Oldofredi & Cristian Lopez). Please cite final version when available Eugene Y. S. Chua http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08698v1 2024-07-11T17:32:09Z

In this paper we continue our study of the scientific research carried out at the Institute of Physics of the National University of La Plata during the first half of the 20th century, and of the important role played by the physicist Ramon G. Loyarte. Based on his studies, alone or in collaboration with members of the Institute, towards the end of the 1920s Loyarte proposed the possible existence of a new quantum of rotational energy in the mercury atom. This idea raised criticism and generated a fierce scientific controversy that reached the national and international academic media. We analyse this controversy by studying the comments that appeared in international review journals. We also study Loyarte's activities in politics and science policy in Argentina in the 1930s and 1940s, where he was responsible for interesting political and scientific initiatives.

2024-07-11T17:32:09Z Article in Spanish, PDF document. Other related documents available at https://www.universoeinstein.com.ar/einsteinargentina.htm Revista Brasileira de Historia da Ciencia 15:325-346, 2022 Alejandro Gangui Eduardo L. Ortiz 10.53727/rbhc.v15i2.820 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01989v2 2024-07-10T21:37:18Z

These are lectures notes prepared for a series of seminars I am invited to give at Princeton Philosophy Department in November 2024. They cover the conceptual structure of quantum gravity, the relational interpretation of quantum mechanics, the structure of time, its orientation and the openness of the future, the physical underpinning of information and meaning, and some general considerations on the fact that concepts evolve, on perspectivalism and anti-foundationalism.

2024-07-02T07:03:33Z 51 pages, 3 figures. Version 2 much cleaned. Sincere thanks to Richard Werthamer Carlo Rovelli