https://arxiv.org/api/itNT98cq2qfQUxX/j+65o5nRny4 2026-06-21T11:14:55Z 5621 765 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16506v2 2024-08-09T16:56:53Z

I argue that research in physics operates under an implicit community philosophy, and I offer a definition I think physicists would accept, by and large. I compare this definition to what philosophers, sociologists, and historians of science, with physicists, say we are doing.

2024-01-29T19:24:38Z Comments on the version of this essay I placed on arXiv on January 2024 and other discussions motivated enough revisions and additions to justify placing this version on the arXiv. I have submitted it to the Journal Philosophy of Science P. J. E. Peebles http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07197v3 2024-08-08T16:00:33Z

I present and defend a new ontology for quantum theories (or ``interpretations'' of quantum theory) called Generative Quantum Theory (GQT). GQT postulates different sets of features, and the combination of these different features can help generate different quantum theories. Furthermore, this ontology makes quantum indeterminacy and determinacy play an important explanatory role in accounting for when quantum systems whose values of their properties are indeterminate become determinate. The process via which determinate values arise varies between the different quantum theories. Moreover, quantum states represent quantum properties and structures that give rise to determinacy, and each quantum theory specifies a structure with certain features. I will focus on the following quantum theories: GRW, the Many-Worlds Interpretation, single-world relationalist theories such as Relational Quantum Mechanics, Bohmian Mechanics, hybrid classical-quantum theories, and Environmental Determinacy-based (EnD) Quantum Theory. I will argue that GQT should be taken seriously because it provides a series of important benefits that current widely discussed ontologies lack, namely, wave function realism and primitive ontology, without some of their costs. For instance, it helps generate quantum theories that are compatible with relativistic causality, such as EnD Quantum Theory. Also, GQT has the benefit of providing new ways to compare and evaluate quantum theories, which may lead to philosophical and scientific progress.

2024-04-10T17:55:58Z Updates based on the updates in arXiv:2310.04002 Francisco Pipa http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02840v2 2024-08-07T10:57:49Z

It is often stated that the second law of thermodynamics follows from the condition that at some given time in the past the entropy was lower than it is now. Formally, this condition is the statement that $E[S(t)|S(t_0)]$, the expected entropy of the universe at the current time $t$ conditioned on its value $S(t_0)$ at a time $t_0$ in the past, is an increasing function of $t $. We point out that in general this is incorrect. The epistemic axioms underlying probability theory say that we should condition expectations on all that we know, and on nothing that we do not know. Arguably, we know the value of the universe's entropy at the present time $t$ at least as well as its value at a time in the past, $t_0$. However, as we show here, conditioning expected entropy on its value at two times rather than one radically changes its dynamics, resulting in a unexpected, very rich structure. For example, the expectation value conditioned on two times can have a maximum at an intermediate time between $t_0$ and $t$, i.e., in our past. Moreover, it can have a negative rather than positive time derivative at the present. In such "Boltzmann bridge" situations, the second law would not hold at the present time. We illustrate and investigate these phenomena for a random walk model and an idealized gas model, and briefly discuss the role of Boltzmann bridges in our universe.

2024-07-03T06:37:22Z 10 pages, 10 figures Jordan Scharnhorst David Wolpert Carlo Rovelli http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02952v1 2024-08-06T04:33:41Z

Various 'optimistic' attempts have been made to reasonably explain the undeniable effectiveness of mathematics in its application to physics. They range over retrospective, historical accounts of mathematical applicability based on pragmatic considerations, on the one side, and prospective accounts based on indispensability considerations, on the other. In view of some objections that I will raise against these accounts, I would like to propose a third alternative based on Ernst Cassirer's neo-Kantian view which can overcome these objections and embrace both pragmatic and indispensability considerations. According to this view, mathematics and physics are seen as different modes of a basic process of cognitive synthesis that are essentially applied to each other according to a priori principles of theory development inherently incorporated into scientists' minds. As emphasised by Cassirer, these principles have a constitutive role (i.e., they explain the relevant phenomena across scientific change) and a regulative role (i.e., they incorporate the ideal of unity, permanence and generality at each stage of knowledge), both of which have been captured through a functional (i.e., structural) understanding of concepts. As a particular case study, these principles shall be instantiated by invariance groups responsible for the effectiveness of applying Lie group theory to physics.

2024-08-06T04:33:41Z Jorge Manero http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02790v1 2024-08-05T19:13:41Z

Einstein identified singularities in spacetimes, such as at the Schwarzschild radius, where later relativists only find a coordinate system assigning multiple values to a single spacetime event. These differing judgments derive from differences in mathematical methods. Later relativists employ geometrical structures to correct anomalies in the coordinate systems used in analytic expressions. Einstein took the analytic expressions to be primary and the geometrical structures as mere heuristics that could be overruled if physical assumptions required it. Einstein's non-geometric methods had a firm base in the history of mathematical methods. They continued the non-geometric orientation of Christoffel, Ricci and LeviCivita. Einstein's insistence that singularities must be eliminated marked a departure from earlier tolerance of singularities. It was founded upon his longterm project of eliminating arbitrariness from fundamental physical theories. However, Einstein was willing to theorize with singularities only temporarily if they were the least arbitrary approach then available.

2024-08-05T19:13:41Z Philosophy of Physics 2(1) (2024) 13:1-73 John D. Norton 10.31389/pop.91 http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04002v5 2024-08-05T14:34:36Z

I propose a novel interpretation of quantum theory, which I will call Environmental Determinacy-based (EnDQT). In contrast to the well-known interpretations of quantum theory, EnDQT has the benefit of not adding non-local, superdeterministic, or retrocausal hidden variables. Also, it is not in tension with relativistic causality by providing a local causal explanation of quantum correlations. Furthermore, measurement outcomes don't vary according to, for example, systems or worlds. It is a conservative QT in the sense that, unlike theories such as spontaneous collapse theories, no modifications of the fundamental equations of quantum theory are required to establish when determinate values arise. Moreover, in principle, arbitrary systems can be in a coherent superposition for an arbitrary amount of time. According to EnDQT, at a certain stage of the evolution of the universe, some systems acquire the capacity to have and give rise to other systems having determinate values through an indeterministic process. Furthermore, this capacity propagates via local interactions between systems. When systems are isolated from others that have this capacity, they can, in principle, evolve unitarily indefinitely. EnDQT may provide payoffs to other areas of physics and their foundations, such as cosmology, via the features of the systems that start the chains of interactions.

2023-10-06T04:05:38Z I have added a toy model of an SDC and improved the argument for the locality of EnDQT Francisco Pipa http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21132v1 2024-07-30T18:49:12Z

The paper discusses the possible implications of the relational framework of Pure Shape Dynamics for the metaphysics of time. The starting point of the analysis is an interpretation of shapes in ontic structural realist terms, which gives rise to the notion of self-subsisting structure. The relational version of a Newtonian-particle toy model is introduced and discussed as a concrete example.

2024-07-30T18:49:12Z 25 pages, 3 figures. Forthcoming in the special issue "On time in the foundations of physics" of the Journal for General Philosophy of Science Antonio Vassallo Pedro Naranjo 10.1007/s10838-024-09690-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20458v1 2024-07-29T23:35:41Z

In this paper we seek to understand what current knowledge of entanglement entropies suggests about the appropriate way to interpret the covariant entropy bound. We first begin by arguing that just as in the classical case, a universal bound on the von Neumann entropy could have either an epistemic or ontological origin. We then consider several possible ways of explaining the bound as a consequence of features of the entanglement entropy. We discuss consider area laws in condensed matter and quantum field theory, arguing that they suggest an epistemic reading of the bound. We also discuss the 'spacetime from entanglement' programme, arguing that entanglement alone may not be able to full ground spacetime topology, but it could potentially play a role in determining the spacetime metric, in which case it would potentially support a more ontological reading of the bound.

2024-07-29T23:35:41Z Philosophy of Physics 2(1): 9, 1-23, 2024 Emily Adlam http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20457v1 2024-07-29T23:30:47Z

I suggest that the current situation in quantum field theory (QFT) provides some reason to question the universal validity of ontological reductionism. I argue that the renormalization group flow is reversible except at fixed points, which makes the relation between large and small distance scales quite symmetric in QFT, opening up at least the technical possibility of a non-reductionist approach to QFT. I suggest that some conceptual problems encountered within QFT may potentially be mitigated by moving to an alternative picture in which it is no longer the case that the large supervenes on the small. Finally, I explore some specific models in which a form of non-reductionism might be implemented, and consider the prospects for future development of these models.

2024-07-29T23:30:47Z Forthcoming in Synthese Emily Adlam http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19945v1 2024-07-29T12:27:36Z

In this article we present and discuss the work and scientific legacy of Julian Hirniak, the Ukrainian chemist and physicist who published two articles in 1908 and 1911 about periodic chemical reactions. Over the last 110+ years, his theoretical work has often been cited favorably in connection with Alfred Lotka's theoretical model of an oscillating reaction system. Other authors have pointed out thermodynamic problems in Hirniak's reaction scheme. Based on English translations of his 1908 Ukrainian and 1911 German articles, we show that Hirniak's claim (that a cycle of inter-conversions of three chemical isomers in a closed reaction vessel can show damped periodic behavior) violates the \textit{Principle of Detailed Balance} (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics), and that Hirniak was aware of this Principle. We also discuss his results in relation to Lotka's first model of damped oscillations in an open system of chemical reactions involving an auto-catalytic reaction operating far from equilibrium. Taking hints from both Hirniak and Lotka, we show that the mundane case of a kinase enzyme catalyzing the phosphorylation of a sugar can satisfy Hirniak's conditions for damped oscillations to its steady state flux (i.e., the Michaelis--Menten rate law), but that the oscillations are so highly damped as to be unobservable. Finally, we examine historical and factual misunderstandings related to Julian Hirniak and his publications.

2024-07-29T12:27:36Z 76 pages, 5 figures Niklas Manz Yurij Holovatch John Tyson http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19733v1 2024-07-29T06:51:41Z

The earliest written reference in Indian astronomy to a total solar eclipse is in the Rig Veda where Rishi Atri is said to have demolished the asura Swarbhanu to liberate the Sun from a total solar eclipse. The Rig Veda describes the occurrence of the eclipse, how the Sun suddenly disappeared in the daytime under the spell of the Asura. The people and gods were scared but the Great Sage Atri saved the Sun and restored his full glory. While discussing the eclipse, Tilak refers to the eclipse as having occurred when the Vernal Equinox was in Orion and three days before the Autumnal Equinox. Based on these data, we identify Atris eclipse as the one that occurred on 22 October 4202 BC or on 19 October 3811 BC.

2024-07-29T06:51:41Z 6 pages 2 figures Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 2023, vol 26 no 2, pages 405 to 410, Mayank Vahia Misturu Soma http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.20282v2 2024-07-28T11:09:54Z

We provide novel, metatheoretical arguments strengthening the position that the naturalness problem of the light Higgs mass is a pseudo-problem: No physics beyond the standard model of particle physics is needed to explain the small value of the Higgs boson. By evaluating previous successes of the guiding principle of technical naturalness, we restrict its applicability to non-fundamental phenomena in the realm of provisional theories within limited energy scales. In view of further breaches of autonomy of scales in apparently fundamental phenomena outside particle physics, the hierarchy problem of the Higgs mass is instead reinterpreted as an indication of the ontologically fundamental status of the Higgs boson. Applying the concept of Selective Realism justifies this seemingly contradictory attribution within the effective theories of the standard model of particle physics. Moreover, we argue that the ongoing naturalness debate about the Higgs mass is partly based on the adherence to the methodology of effective theories (often claimed to be universally applicable), for which there is no justification when dealing with presumably fundamental phenomena such as the Higgs mechanism, even if it is embedded into an effective theory.

2024-03-29T16:51:25Z Foundations of Physics Vol. 55, Article 39 (2025) Johannes Branahl 10.1007/s10701-025-00852-3 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18573v1 2024-07-26T07:56:51Z

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Paul Felenbok (1936-2020) who was astronomer at Paris-Meudon observatory, and founded in 1974, fifty years ago, a high altitude station (2930 m), above Saint V{é}ran village in the southern Alps (Queyras). It was initially devoted to the study of the solar corona. Following solar eclipses (1970, 1973) observed with the Lallemand electronic camera, the main goal was to detect with this sensitive detector the structures of the far and hot corona in forbidden lines, using either narrow bandpass filters or spectroscopy. But everything had to be done prior to observations: a track, a house for astronomers, a dome and a complex instrument. We summarize here this fantastic adventure, which was partly successful in terms of scientific results and had to stop in 1982; however, the activity of the station resumed after 1989 under the auspices of the ``AstroQueyras'' association, which replaced the coronagraph by a 62 cm night telescope from Haute Provence observatory; the station extended later with two 50 cm telescopes, was rebuilt in 2015 and received the visit of thousands of amateurs.

2024-07-26T07:56:51Z Jean-Marie Malherbe http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16774v1 2024-07-23T18:13:41Z

I present a simple baby-steps reconstruction of quantum mechanics as a fully classical theory. The most radical conceptual leap required is that there are many coexisting classical worlds, but even this is justified by the necessity of objective probabilities. These baby steps lead to a version of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics with built-in probabilities, built-in classicality at the macroscopic level, and an explanation of the complex numbers in quantum mechanics. Despite its simplicity and minimalism of radical concepts, this is not a toy model, being equivalent with quantum field theory.

2024-07-23T18:13:41Z Easy introduction, 21 pages, 15 figures Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16285v1 2024-07-23T08:37:55Z

During the first few centuries CE, the centre of the known world gradually shifted from Alexandria to Constantinople. Combined with a societal shift from pagan beliefs to Christian doctrines, Antiquity gave way to the Byzantine era. While Western Europe entered an extended period of intellectual decline, Constantinople developed into a rich cultural crossroads between East and West. Yet, Byzantine scholarship in astronomy and geography continued to rely heavily on their ancient Greek heritage, and particularly on Ptolemy's Geography. Unfortunately, Ptolemy's choices for his geographic coordinate system resulted in inherent and significant distortions of and inaccuracies in maps centred on the Byzantine Empire. This comprehensive review of Byzantine geographic achievements -- supported by a review of astronomical developments pertaining to position determination on Earth -- aims to demonstrate why and how, when Constantinople fell to the Turks in 1453 and the Ottoman Empire commenced, Byzantine astronomers had become the central axis in an extensive network of Christians, Muslims and Jews. Their influence remained significant well into the Ottoman era, particularly in the context of geographical applications.

2024-07-23T08:37:55Z Accepted for publication in De Medio Aevo, special issue: Costache D. (ed.), Scientific Interests and Technological Innovation in Byzantium: Interdisciplinary Perspectives; 20 pages, incl. 9 figures Richard de Grijs Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia