https://arxiv.org/api/U+iwq1bkXH/XiZheFcwHAO0BnRQ 2026-06-21T10:09:59Z 5621 750 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05169v2 2024-08-28T07:47:59Z

The purpose of this article is to provide a novel approach and justification of the idea that classical physics and quantum physics can neither function nor even be conceived one without the other - in line with ideas attributed to e.g. Niels Bohr or Lev Landau. Though this point of view may go against current common wisdom, we will show that it perfectly fits with empirical evidence, and can be maintained without giving up physical realism. In order to place our arguments in a convenient historical perspective, we will proceed as if we were following the path of a police investigation, about the demise, or vanishing, of some valuable properties of the two electrons in the helium atom. We will start from experimentally based evidence in order to analyse and explain physical facts, moving cautiously from a classical to a quantum description, without mixing them up. The overall picture will be that the physical properties of microscopic systems are quantized, as initially shown by Planck and Einstein, and they are also contextual, i.e. that they can be given a physical sense only by embedding a microscopic system within a macroscopic measurement context.

2024-06-07T09:43:30Z 11 pages, 3 figures. In v2 abstract rewritten and minor edition and clarification in the text Philippe Grangier Alexia Auffeves Nayla Farouki Mathias Van Den Bossche Olivier Ezratty http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04450v1 2024-08-24T21:36:16Z

With special relativity, we seem to be facing a conundrum. It is a very well-tested theory; in this way, the Minkowski spacetime must be "capturing" essential features of space and time. However, its geometry seems to be incompatible with any sort of global notion of time. We might only have local notions of now (present moment) and time flow, at best. In this note, we will explore the possibility that a pretty much global notion of now (and time flow) might be hiding in plain sight in the geometry of the Minkowski spacetime.

2024-08-24T21:36:16Z 6 pages, 8 figures Mario Bacelar Valente http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11705v1 2024-08-21T15:29:54Z

There is noticeable consensus among physicists and philosophers that only gauge-invariant quantities can be physically real. However, this insight that physical quantities must be gauge-invariant is not well-reflected in standard approaches to particle physics. For instance, each and every elementary field/particle of the Standard Model fails to be gauge-invariant! The main objective of this paper is to offer an accessible, concise, and convincing analysis of why philosophers and physicists should devote more of their energy to working on gauge-invariant approaches. Correspondingly, the thesis of this paper is that pursuing gauge-invariant approaches has several virtues. For instance, gauge-invariant reformulations allow us to make particle physics consistent with the mathematical framework in which it is formulated. This is illustrated by how mathematical theorems such as Elitzur's theorem, the Gribov ambiguity, and Haag's theorem pose problems for standard approaches but are avoided by gauge-invariant approaches.

2024-08-21T15:29:54Z Philipp Berghofer http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07725v2 2024-08-20T17:32:32Z

In the present paper, we outline and expound the fundamental and novel qualitative-cum-philosophical premises, principles, ideas, concepts, constructions and results that originate from our ongoing research project of applying the conceptual panoply and the technical machinery of Abstract Differential Geometry (ADG) to various persistently outstanding issues in Quantum Gravity (QG) research. At the end of the paper, we discuss the potential philosophical repercussions of two possible future research routes that the main stream of our applications of ADG to QG may bifurcate towards in view of three independent, but overlapping, research papers that are currently under development.

2024-08-14T13:58:07Z Corrected, updated and slightly expanded Version II of the paper, to replace Version I Ioannis Raptis http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10674v1 2024-08-20T09:26:16Z

We show that the geometric structure of an arbitrary relativistic spacetime can be determined by the transformation groups associated with a collection of privileged coordinate systems.

2024-08-20T09:26:16Z Henrique Gomes Tushar Menon Oliver Pooley James Read http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15353v2 2024-08-19T15:07:39Z

This paper aims at studying the spin once again. The departure point is thus the Stern and Gerlach experimental results that can be described in a coherent way in the frame of quantum mechanics only. Instead, the relativistic mechanics point of view is proposed here following the work presented in a previous article about rigid body rotation. Indeed, a careful study of the horizon of this relativistic rigid body rotation appears to be invariant from any observation angle in full agreement with the spin property.

2023-12-22T07:14:09Z French version of a paper submitted to Scientific Reports Stefan Catheline http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10023v1 2024-08-19T14:15:22Z

An English (2024) translation (v1) by P. Marquet of the Max Planck's 1911 paper "Energy and temperature" published first in French ("Energie et température", J. Phys. Theor. Appl., 1 (1), p.345-359) and then in German ("Energie und Temperatur", Phys. Z., 12 (16), p.681-687).

2024-08-19T14:15:22Z 34 pages 1911, J. Phys. Theor. Appl., 1 (1), p.345-359 and 1911, Phys. Z., 12 (16), p.681-687 Pascal Marquet Max Planck 10.5281/zenodo.13342618 http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09374v1 2024-08-18T06:17:00Z

The Landau-Nordita conference that was held in Moscow in 1981 was the first place where I met Lars. This "marvellous meeting", as Lars quoted in one of his reminiscence article, was organised by Alan Luther. It was an event that generated a long-lasting friendship of scientists from East and West, provided a background for the future collaborations and, in particular, my own collaboration with Lars on a supersymmetric high-spin extension of the Poincaré group.

2024-08-18T06:17:00Z 13 pages and 3 photos George Savvidy http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08008v1 2024-08-15T08:18:41Z

An English (2024) translation (v1) by P. Marquet of the 1912 German paper "Über neuere thermodynamische Theorien. (Nernstsches Wärmetheorem und Quanten-Hypothese) / On recent thermodynamic theories. (Nernst heat theorem and quantum hypothesis)" by Max Planck published in the "Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft (Reports of the German Chemical Society)", vol.45, p.5-23.

2024-08-15T08:18:41Z 34 pages Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft, 1912, vol.45, p.5-23 Pascal Marquet Max Planck 10.5281/zenodo.13318447 http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02170v4 2024-08-14T10:05:25Z

After the advent of the theory of special relativity, the existence of absolute time in nature was rejected within the society of physics. In recent decades, William Lane Craig has endeavoured to offer an interpretation of the empirical evidence that support the theory of relativity while maintaining the concept of absolute time. His interpretation, however, is based upon supernatural presuppositions due to which it cannot be accepted as a scientific argument. Here, after explaining Craig's view, we attempt to reconstruct his explanation for absolute time using the concept of general substantial motion of nature, well-known in Mulla Sadra's philosophy as the most important approach in Islamic philosophy; thereby, proving general time for the natural world. Although Craig considers some evidence from modern physics in his reasoning for absolute time, in this paper, after pointing to some evidence, it is discussed that the approach used here better bridges the gap that exists between the metaphysics and the physics of the argument.

2020-09-03T07:58:52Z 21 pages SOPHIA (2024), Vol. 63, No. 2 M. S. Kavyani H. Razmi H. Parsania 10.1007/s11841-024-01038-6 http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21070v2 2024-08-12T23:07:53Z

We discuss the teaching of the discussion surrounding Bender and Koller's prominent ACL 2020 paper, "Climbing toward NLU: on meaning form, and understanding in the age of data" \cite{bender2020climbing}. We present what we understand to be the main contentions of the paper, and then recommend that the students engage with the natural counter-arguments to the claims in the paper. We attach teaching materials that we use to facilitate teaching this topic to undergraduate students.

2024-07-28T18:33:58Z In ACL 2024 Workshop on Teaching NLP (TeachNLP 2024) Michael Guerzhoy http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06439v1 2024-08-12T18:39:19Z

It is widely acknowledged that the Galilean Relativity Principle, according to which the laws of classical systems are the same in all inertial frames in relative motion, has played an important role in the development of modern physics. It is also commonly believed that this principle holds the key to answering why, for example, we do not notice the orbital velocity of the Earth as we go about our day. And yet, I argue in this paper that the precise content of this principle is ambiguous: standard presentations fail to distinguish between two principles that are ultimately inequivalent, the "External Galilean Relativity Principle" (EGRP) and the "Internal Galilean Relativity Principle" (IGRP). I demonstrate that EGRP and IGRP play distinct roles in physics and that many classical systems that satisfy IGRP fail to satisfy EGRP. I further show that the Relativity Principle introduced by Einstein in 1905-which is not restricted to classical systems-also leads to two inequivalent principles. I conclude by noting that the phenomenon originally captured by Galileo's famous ship passage is much more general than contemporary discussions in the philosophy of symmetries suggest.

2024-08-12T18:39:19Z The paper is forthcoming in the journal Noûs. This is the last version before the proofs S. Murgueitio Ramírez http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18307v2 2024-08-12T09:41:00Z

We propose an extension of the classical dichotomous categorization of research programmes into progress and degeneration according to Lakatos in the form of a neutral third category: the stagnant research programme. First, a critical examination of the primary literature with its often criticized definitional gaps justifies such a category. Through a generic derivation of criteria for stagnant programmes, a clear demarcation from progressive and degenerative ones is achieved. An empirical cross-check is subsequently employed for support: Both a series of examples from fundamental physics and a general analysis of today's research landscape also suggest on an empirical level the need to go beyond the traditional Lakatosian conception. Attributing stagnation is entirely in line with Lakatos' original intentions, which aimed not to hastily discard promising research but to exercise patience until the lifting of certain external constraints potentially enables progress once again.

2024-04-28T20:37:43Z Johannes Branahl http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05828v1 2024-08-11T17:05:01Z

I introduce a framework to distinguish two domains of physics - the manifest (i.e. the directly observable empirical records in terms of manifest configurations) and the non-manifest domain of physics (i.e. the things that the manifest configurations signify according to a physical theory). I show that many quantum 'paradoxes' rest on ambiguous reasoning about the two domains. More concretely, I study so-called 'surrealistic' trajectories, the 'delayed choice quantum eraser', and 'weak measurements'. Finally, I show how the alleged puzzles resolve in the framework provided. I then formally define and address the question of whether quantum uncertainty could be fundamental or whether post-quantum theories could have predictive advantage whilst conforming to the Born rule on average. This notion of what I call 'empirical completeness' refers to actual prediction-making beyond the Born probabilities, and thus delineates the operational notion of predictability from a 'hidden variable' programme in quantum theory. I study how empirical completeness connects to signal-locality, and argue that a partial proof for the impossibility of predictive advantage can be established for bi-partite quantum systems. The relevant results demonstrate signal-locality as a sufficient principle that might explain the fundamental chanciness in present and future quantum theories and, in turn, reconciles us to many quantum features as aspects of limits on Nature's predictability.

2024-08-11T17:05:01Z PhD thesis, University of Oxford (2022), 176 pages, 17 figures, overlap with arXiv:1707.07884 and arXiv:2309.10395 by the author. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e7c59dac-579c-4ecf-b887-3d315060d144 Johannes Fankhauser http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05403v1 2024-08-10T01:45:59Z

Objections to pilot-wave theory frequently come in three mutually-contradictory categories: that the theory is too bizarrely different from ordinary physics, that the theory is not radically different enough, and that the physics of pilot-wave theory is after all just the same as quantum physics. After a brief review of pilot-wave theory, we critically evaluate these objections. We show how the radical nature of pilot-wave theory is often misunderstood or overlooked. We highlight the novelty of its dynamics, and clarify its implications for our understanding of measurement, as well as discussing the status of Lorentz invariance, conservation laws, and the Born rule. We examine Einstein's early work on pilot-wave theory and argue that he turned away from it for reasons which are no longer compelling. We urge that the theory be understood on its own terms, as a generalised nonequilibrium theory empirically distinct from quantum mechanics, with all its potentially revolutionary implications.

2024-08-10T01:45:59Z 37 pages. To appear in: Guiding Waves in Quantum Mechanics: 100 Years of de Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory, A. Oldofredi (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press Guiding Waves in Quantum Mechanics: One Hundred Years of de Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory, ed. A. Oldofredi (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2025), pp. 67-100 Antony Valentini