https://arxiv.org/api/H6X3E72L0u0oodHJZuwm0GfGMz4 2026-06-13T11:51:01Z 5610 75 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14234v1 2026-04-14T20:26:22Z

Consciousness and quantum mechanics are among the most puzzling phenomena studied in the sciences. Some scholars suggest they are related, though others think this claim commits a "minimization of mystery" fallacy. The aim of this programmatic paper is to draw attention to a less widely discussed parallel between consciousness and quantum mechanics: both challenge the classical objectivist worldview of science. Under certain assumptions, they are each in tension with a package of metaphysical theses -- "non-relationalism", "non-fragmentation", and "one world" -- that jointly make up that worldview. This points to three distinct non-objectivist responses: the "relationalist", "fragmentalist", and "many-subjective-worlds" ones. We will map out their pros and cons.

2026-04-14T20:26:22Z 36 pages, 1 figure, 1 table John B. DeBrota Christian List http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12897v1 2026-04-14T15:46:16Z

The term 'neutrinoless' is a cornerstone of modern particle physics, yet it defines a fundamental process by what is missing rather than what is created. We trace the origins of this privative neologism to a 1953 experimental claim and show how a 'sociology of suspicion' transformed Ettore Majorana's affirmative ontology into an agnostic shorthand. By examining this linguistic shift, we argue that our current terminology may obscure the profound physical meaning of the search. Reclaiming the language of 'matter creation' is not merely a semantic choice, but a timely conceptual shift to bridge the gap between experimental caution and the radical character of the laws of nature we aim to uncover.

2026-04-14T15:46:16Z 6 pages, 3 figures. This essay traces the origins of the neologism 'neutrinoless' to the 1950s and proposes returning to the affirmative language of 'matter creation'. Accepted for publication in 'Giornale di Fisica' Francesco Vissani http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21159v2 2026-04-14T13:41:24Z

String field theory is supposed to stand to perturbative string theory as quantum field theory stands to single-particle quantum theory; as such, it purports to offer a substantially more general and powerful perspective on string theory than the perturbative approach. In addition, string field theory has been claimed for several decades to liberate string theory from any fixed, background spatiotemporal commitments -- thereby (if true) rendering it `background independent'. But is this really so? In this article, we undertake a detailed interrogation of this claim, finding that the verdict is sensitive both to one's understanding of the notion of background independence, and also to how one understands string field theory itself. Although in the end our verdicts on the question of the background independence are therefore somewhat mixed, we hope that our study will elevate the levels of systematicity and rigour in these discussions, as well as equip philosophers of physics with a helpful introduction to string field theory and the variety of interesting conceptual questions which it raises.

2025-09-25T13:44:24Z 54 pages Bhanu Narra James Read Matěj Krátký http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13135v1 2026-04-14T07:55:42Z

Roman Schnabel's article argues that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox can be resolved by identifying a flaw in what the author calls the "EPR implication" and by using radioactive alpha decay as an example showing that predictability does not exclude genuine randomness. The paper is clearly written and addresses an important foundational question. In our view, however, its main conclusion does not follow. The article narrows the original EPR argument, attributes too much to Bell-inequality violations, and replaces the central EPR structure - which involves incompatible observables and locality-based reasoning - with a simpler case of correlated random events. The result is an interesting interpretive remark, but not, we think, a satisfactory scientific resolution of the EPR problem.

2026-04-14T07:55:42Z 4 pages, 10 references Mikołaj Sienicki Krzysztof Sienicki http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12094v1 2026-04-13T22:09:34Z

I argue that there is a straightforward way to understand the occurrence of wavefunction collapses or 'quantum events' in relational approaches to quantum mechanics: we necessarily encounter a discontinuity in our description when a system interacts with the reference relative to which we are describing it, since the reference system cannot be described relative to itself. This makes it clear how recent concerns around quantum events in relational quantum mechanics should be resolved. However, the solution requires accepting that quantum mechanics is not a complete description of all physical facts, and moreover I argue that this is most likely inevitable if we want to be able to give a precise description of quantum events.

2026-04-13T22:09:34Z Emily Adlam http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11826v1 2026-04-11T12:07:46Z

During the voyages that led him to discover the new continent bearing his name, Amerigo Vespucci made interesting astronomical observations of the southern sky. In the past, his data have been interpreted with criteria that do not follow Vespucci's indications, resulting in identifications that are not credible or even leading to the assertion that the data themselves are incomprehensible. However, it is possible to construct a coherent picture of all the information, arriving at an identification that is in some cases very probable, in other cases almost certain, of the stars described by Vespucci. Analysis of documents shows that he made good-quality measurements, but his incomplete knowledge of ancient texts prevented him from distinguishing the new stars from the already known ones, giving rise to a period of confusion in 16th century celestial cartography.

2026-04-11T12:07:46Z 10 pages, 9 figures Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 28(4), 901-910 (2025) Davide Neri 10.3724/sp.j.1440-2807.2026.01.03 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11823v1 2026-04-11T10:33:40Z

According to various no-go results in the foundations of quantum mechanics, for any system associated to a Hilbert space of dimension higher than two, it is not possible to assign definite truth values to all propositions pertaining to the system without generating a Kochen-Specker contradiction. In this respect, the Bub-Clifton uniqueness theorem is utilized for arguing that truth-value definiteness is consistently restored with respect to a determinate sublattice of propositions defined by the state of the quantum system concerned and a particular observable to be measured. On this basis, a perspectivist/contextual account of truth valuation in the quantum domain is produced that satisfies Tarski's criterion of material adequacy for a theory of truth. In light of the latter, perspectivist truth conforms to perspective or context-bound correspondence of a de re nature, designating locally an objectively existing state of affairs. Such an account derives by virtue of the microphysical nature of physical reality in displaying a context-dependence of facts; thus, it essentially opposes a non-perspectival, metaphysically fixed point of reference, or a panoptical standpoint from which to state all facts of nature.

2026-04-11T10:33:40Z 18 pages. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2511.05504, arXiv:1504.01544 European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2026, 16:14 Vassilios Karakostas 10.1007/s13194-026-00725-0 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09826v1 2026-04-10T18:57:32Z

In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a thought experiment that is entirely correct, has been demonstrated in real experiments, and is now the most famous in quantum physics. Their pioneering work described, for the first time, quantum correlations and can be regarded as a very early glimpse into today's 'deep' quantum technologies, by which I mean those that enhance functionality by making use of quantum correlations. However, their work also contains a paradox that Erwin Schroedinger had already recognised as such in 1935 and which has since been cemented by the so-called Bell experiments. Here, I am now able to pinpoint the origin of the paradox within the chain of reasoning, which ultimately resolves the paradox.

2026-04-10T18:57:32Z Roman Schnabel http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03843v3 2026-04-10T07:37:34Z

Loschmidt's paradox asks why macroscopic irreversibility is universal despite the time-reversal symmetry of microscopic dynamics. We argue that irreversibility is not a property of the dynamics but of accessibility: chaotic evolution drives phase-space structure below the quantum resolution scale $\ell_\hbar$, at a critical time $t_c = λ^{-1}\ln(δ_0/\ell_\hbar)$, after which the time-reversed microstate exists as a valid solution of Hamilton's equations but cannot be selected by any physically admissible operation. The mechanism operates entirely within the semiclassical regime $t_c \leq t_E$, where classical geometry is exact. This provides a dynamical resolution of the Loschmidt paradox. The quantum foundation is established using a Krylov-complexity framework: we prove that for any $H(t)=H(-t)$, the quantum Lyapunov exponent satisfies $λ_L^{\rm forward} = λ_L^{\rm backward}$. The arrow of time is not in the dynamics. The mechanism predicts sigmoid fidelity decay, logarithmic scaling of $t_c$ with $λ^{-1}$, and ensemble-size independence of the inaccessibility threshold -- all consistent with three decades of Loschmidt echo experiments and confirmed in a stadium-billiard simulation reported here. Underlying everything: quantum mechanics conserves information exactly. Entropy, defined as the logarithm of the multiplicity $Ω$ -- the number of possibilities consistent with the available information -- can only increase when information becomes operationally inaccessible. The second law reflects not a breakdown of microscopic reversibility, but the dynamical inaccessibility of the information required to reverse it.

2025-11-05T20:23:58Z 20 pages, 2 figures. SI- 4 pages Ira Wolfson http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23410v2 2026-04-09T17:30:17Z

Henri Poincare Saint Louis lecture, delivered on 24 September 1904 at the International Congress of Arts and Science, occupies a distinctive place in the pre history of twentieth century theoretical physics. In this text, Poincare formulated the principle of relativity in explicit and general terms, not as a narrow empirical rule limited to electrodynamics, but as one of the major guiding principles of mathematical physics. The lecture also offered a principle based conception of theory centered on invariance, least action, and general theoretical coherence. Although the conceptual importance of the Saint Louis lecture has long been recognized in the historiography of relativity, far less attention has been devoted to the material conditions under which it entered international circulation. This article examines the editorial, commercial, and institutional pathways through which the lecture was disseminated between late 1904 and early 1905. It reconstructs the three principal early publication channels of the text: its first printed appearance in La Revue des idees in November 1904, which inserted it into a commercially organized and interdisciplinary intellectual review; its republication in the Bulletin des sciences mathematiques in December 1904, which brought it into a widely distributed specialized mathematical network and later provided the standard reference most often used by historians; and its English translation in The Monist in January 1905, which extended its reach into a transatlantic forum devoted to philosophy, science, and the foundations of knowledge.

2026-03-24T16:41:59Z Hector Giacomini http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01982v3 2026-04-08T10:02:37Z

We present a seven-pronged no-go result for quantum mechanics: a "heptalemma". It shows that seven initially plausible theses about physical reality are jointly inconsistent with the predictions of quantum mechanics, while any six are jointly consistent. We must then decide which theses to retain and which to give up. Since different interpretations of quantum mechanics entail different responses to the heptalemma, we get a novel taxonomy of such interpretations. Beyond the application to quantum mechanics, the heptalemma offers a general diagnostic criterion for determining whether a given scientific domain should count as classical or not, and if not, how it departs from classicality.

2025-12-01T18:39:40Z 36 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. v2: Minor updates after feedback Foundations of Physics 56, 24 (2026) John B. DeBrota Christian List 10.1007/s10701-026-00919-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03835v1 2026-04-04T19:20:53Z

We demonstrate that the system of fine-tuning constraints for life is, in a sense, overdetermined: the a priori probability of its feasibility is extremely low, especially in the chemical sector. This entails that the structure of the physical laws is even more "unreasonable" than Eugene Wigner envisaged.

2026-04-04T19:20:53Z 5 pages, 2 figures Alexey Burov Alexei Tsvelik http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01233v2 2026-04-03T18:28:21Z

The family of Tibetan lunisolar calendars operates on a shared arithmetic axiom (67 lunar months = 65 solar months) that provides a rigid structure but causes observable seasonal drift. This study deconstructs the calendar through a progressive analytical sequence, first presenting it as an explicit computational procedure, then isolating its structural core of incidence rules and mean-motion models. This separation distinguishes structurally forced features from tradition-dependent ones, allowing inaccuracies to be rigorously decomposed into internal arithmetic drift, sidereal misalignment, and anomaly-phase defects. Crucially, computational analysis also reveals remarkable historical robustness: the discrete arithmetic of traditional day rules renders boundary tie-cases operationally absent, while large internal temporal buffers and the multi-hour inaccuracy of the classical lunar model insulated the calendar against geographic variation. On this basis, the paper develops a stratified reform space rather than a single replacement proposal. The resulting standards range from conservative rational repairs preserving traditional arithmetic to explicit astronomical reconstructions culminating in fully dynamical models of true solar and lunar motion. The guiding question is how far astronomical correction can be carried without discarding the Tibetan calendrical identity embodied in the structural rules for month and day labeling. Finally, calendric reform requires more than new formulas and constants; it demands precise numerical semantics. The proposed standards are thus formulated not merely as abstract models, but as executable, reproducible specifications suitable for implementation, validation, and long-term transmission across computational environments.

2026-03-24T01:17:27Z 140 pages, 21 figures Tsogtgerel Gantumur http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02521v1 2026-04-02T21:21:52Z

We present SESCC (Speed-Error Signals Cross-Correlation), a method for dating ancient star catalogues from the cross-correlation between stellar proper-motion speeds and positional residuals. At the true epoch, residuals are independent of proper-motion speed; the epoch estimate is the trial date that minimises this cross-correlation. For ecliptic latitudes, SESCC applies the dot product between speeds and residuals across all catalogue stars without subset selection or linear modelling. For ecliptic longitudes, SESCC-pairs uses pairwise longitude differences between neighbouring stars, making the method immune to any global longitude offset by algebraic construction. Validated against Tycho Brahe (1547 CE, true ~1580 CE) and Ulugh Beg (1452 CE, true 1437 CE), and confirmed invariant under offsets of +-6 deg, the method is applied to the Almagest. Both coordinates yield bootstrap distributions with 74% pre-Christian minima, consistent with a Hipparchan origin and inconsistent with a Ptolemaic one. The near-absence of quarter-degree fractions in the Almagest longitudes, explained as the deterministic consequence of Ptolemy's precession correction, provides independent corroboration.

2026-04-02T21:21:52Z 17 pages, 4 figures. Code available at https://github.com/carbaior/sescc Carlos Baiget Orts http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02197v1 2026-04-02T15:51:51Z

Applications of quantum mechanics have led to many successful predictions and explanations of puzzling phenomena, and we now apply quantum mechanics to gain, process, and communicate information in novel ways. We can understand quantum mechanics by understanding how we have applied it. We should not seek agreement on the nature of the world it represents, because this theory does not itself represent the physical world (though its applications do help us to represent it better). When applied to a quantum state, quantum mechanics yields probabiities for physical events: both state and probability are objective--not because they represent elements of phyiscal reality, but because each exerts norrmative authority over the beliefs of anyone who accepts quantum mechanics and applies it relative to a physical situation they may (but need not) occupy. These events may be described by statements that are meaningful in an appropriate environmental context, and quantum mechanics can help one to say when that is. Measurement creates an appropriate context, so here the Born rule indirectly yields probabilities of measurement outcomes. The quantum state of a system does not "collapse" on measurement: a new state must be assigned relative to a physical situation in which information about the outcome is accessible. Understood this way, there is no measurement problem, and violations of Bell inequalities does not demonstrate "spooky" non-local action. Quantum field theories have no physical ontology of their own: a quantum field is a mathematical object in a model whose application helps us to improve and extend our descriptions of the world in other terms. We cannot realise the scenario of Wigner's friend and its recent extensions: but the data that provide overwhelming evidence for quantum mechanics are objective in the same sense as the relative measurement outcomes described in those scenarios.

2026-04-02T15:51:51Z 35 pages, 3 figures In Faye, J. and Johansson, L-G (editors) 2026 How to Understand Quantum Mechanics: 100 Years of Ongoing Interpretation. Springer Richard Healey