https://arxiv.org/api/H6X3E72L0u0oodHJZuwm0GfGMz4 2026-09-10T22:27:30Z 5718 75 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19790v2 2026-07-23T17:55:10Z

We find a necessary condition for subsystems to become entangled after a quantum reference frame transformation. We then distinguish between subsystems that admit separable descriptions relative to a quantum reference frame, and those that do not. On the one hand, we show that separable descriptions maximize the entanglement internal to the subsystem, and relate our results with the conservation of entanglement and coherence under quantum reference frame transformations. On the other hand, systems that do not admit a separable description relative to any subsystem display a form of entanglement that is genuine to the quantum reference frame formalism.

2025-12-22T19:00:01Z 5 pages + appendices T. Rick Perche Natália Salomé Móller Guilherme Franzmann http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21679v1 2026-07-23T13:01:47Z

Indigenous narratives have long preserved observations of celestial phenomena, offering insights that resonate with modern astrophysical research. Deeply embedded in cultural traditions, these stories describe events such as stellar variability, supernovae, eclipses, and planetary alignments. Indigenous communities have also used the stars for navigation and calendar systems, reflecting a sophisticated understanding of celestial patterns. These narratives not only complement historical records but offer human-centric perspectives on stellar life cycles that often parallel modern models. Drawing from traditions from diverse Indigenous communities - including Aboriginal Australians, Pueblo peoples, Inuit, and Polynesians - this paper highlights the profound connections between Indigenous knowledge and stellar astrophysics. Integrating these traditions acknowledges their value, safeguards their relevance in the Space Age, and fosters mutual learning through cross-cultural collaboration. We explore how such narratives can enrich education, public engagement, and even inspire scientific hypotheses, bridging cultural heritage and modern astrophysics.

2026-07-23T13:01:47Z 7 pages, accepted for publication in Proceedings of Oxford XIII / IAU Symposium 399 Dionysios Gakis http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12159v2 2026-07-23T10:58:25Z

I define a notion of locality LOC, closely modelled on Bell's principle of local causality, construed as the condition that single-case probabilities cannot be modified by actions at spacelike separation. The new principle, like Bell's, forces Bell inequalities, but with two loopholes: one is violation of measurement independence, known to Bell, but the other is non-uniqueness of remote outcomes, a loophole only for LOC, not for Bell's principle. I also set out a theory of physical probability, applicable to the Everett interpretation, in which the Born rule is derived, and which therefore violates Bell inequalities. I show it is consistent with LOC. Surprisingly, both loopholes are exploited. I conclude not only that physical probability in the Everett interpretation involves no action at a distance, in the sense of LOC, but that the observed violation of Bell inequalities is powerful evidence for many worlds.

2026-01-17T20:11:50Z To appear in Local Quantum Mechanics: Everett, many worlds, and reality, A. Ney (ed.), Oxford University Press. This is a revised version of arXiv: 2601.12159, the latter a revision of arXiv:2512.00575. It is identical to the published version Simon Saunders http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20104v1 2026-07-22T13:00:56Z

The Schrödinger equation can be rewritten as a second-order equation for a single real-valued scalar field. Taken at face value, however, this one-field reduction obscures several local structures of quantum mechanics: the Born density and current, the role of momentum as a generator, and the usual derivation of the uncertainty relation. We argue that these difficulties do not show that real variables fail. They show that the reduced equation is not, by itself, a complete local representation of the theory. Its coherent real form is obtained by restoring the underlying Hamiltonian phase-space structure, where the missing component reappears as a canonical partner. In this real phase-space formulation, the standard structures reappear locally, and minimal magnetic coupling reveals an internal \(SO(2)\) gauge structure. Thus, the symbol \(i\) can be removed, but the symplectic and complex structure it encodes cannot.

2026-07-22T13:00:56Z 35 pages, 2 figures, many equations Oliver Passon Bernd Rosenow http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21649v1 2026-07-22T07:14:17Z

The Hoyle-Narlikar action-at-a-distance formulation for gravity remains one of the most mathematically rigorous attempts to incorporate Mach principle into physics. A lesser known, but no less significant, is the fact that it is also one of the first in which two point functions play a key role in determining spacetime structure, and hence, are more fundamental than the metric. We argue that these ingredients have direct relevance for modern attempts to understand fundamental, emergent, and informational aspects of quantum spacetime. The non-local description of quantum spacetime, with Planck scale $\ell_0$ as a zero-point length, provides a mechanism through which the entire universe can inform local causal structure, `a la Mach, Hoyle, and Narlikar. In this chapter, we highlight certain key aspects of the HN theory and then discuss case studies from modern research that illustrate how the quantum spacetime might realize a version of the quantum gravitational Mach principle.

2026-07-22T07:14:17Z Contribution to "Narlikar's Steady World: Man and the Legend" Dawood Kothawala http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12876v3 2026-07-21T17:35:11Z

On a mathematically foundational level, our most successful physical theories (gauge field theories and general-relativistic theories) are formulated in a framework based on the differential geometry of connections on principal bundles. After reviewing the essentials of this framework, we articulate the generalized hole and point-coincidence arguments, examining how they weight on a substantivalist position towards bundle spaces. This question, then, is considered in light of the Dressing Field Method, which allows a manifestly invariant reformulation of gauge field theories and general-relativistic theories, making their conceptual structure more transparent: it formally implements the point-coincidence argument and thus allows to define (dressed) fields and (dressed) bundle spaces immune to hole-type arguments.

2025-05-19T09:01:30Z V3, 27 pages, typos corrected, new section added, Accepted for publication in Foundations of Physics Found.Phys. 56 (2026) 4, 38 Philipp Berghofer Jordan François Lucrezia Ravera 10.1007/s10701-026-00941-x http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18383v1 2026-07-20T18:00:01Z

Recent no-go theorems based on extended Wigner's Friend scenarios (EWFS) reveal a deep tension between the universal validity of quantum theory and local friendliness (LF), the conjunction of three natural assumptions: the absoluteness of observed events, locality, and no-superdeterminism. In a recent work, Adlam argues that this tension can be dissolved by appealing to quantum reference frames (QRFs). We present and critically assess her proposal. We show that her proposed resolution does not arise from QRFs, but instead relies on three independent modifications: certain degrees of freedom are always definite, observers can flip upon measuring spins, and the outcomes the superobservers record and use to test the inequalities are not their friends' observed results. The proposal and the arguments for the plausibility of these modifications rest on several misconceptions about QRFs and EWFS, which we rectify. We conclude that, within standard quantum theory, quantum reference frames do not evade the EWFS no-go theorems.

2026-07-20T18:00:01Z 13+5 pages Andrea Di Biagio Anne-Catherine de la Hamette http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17408v1 2026-07-19T20:59:32Z

Hilbert-space techniques are widely used not only for quantum theory, but also for classical physics. Two important examples are the Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation and the method of ``classical'' wave functions. As this paper explains, these two approaches are conceptually distinct. In particular, the method of classical wave functions was not due to Bernard Koopman and John von Neumann, but was developed independently by a number of later researchers, perhaps first by Mario Schönberg, with key contributions from Angelo Loinger, Giacomo Della Riccia, Norbert Wiener, and E. C. George Sudarshan. The primary goals of this paper are to explain these two approaches, describe the relevant history in detail, and give credit where credit is due.

2026-07-19T20:59:32Z 21 pages, no figures, accepted version for publication The European Physical Journal H 51, 1 (2026) Jacob A. Barandes 10.1140/epjh/s13129-025-00113-x http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04231v1 2026-07-19T12:41:06Z

In teaching special relativity, John Bell emphasised the value of pre-relativistic intuitions. His famous spaceship puzzle showed that, in certain cases, the older heuristics of Lorentz and FitzGerald get the right answer to a genuinely relativistic problem more reliably than the principles of special relativity themselves. In teaching general relativity, John Wheeler emphasised the value of simplicity, illustrating curved-spacetime geometry with capsules boomeranging through a tunnel along the Earth's diameter. Here I put the two ideas together. I share a simple thought experiment, involving genuinely general-relativistic effects, in which the standard GR heuristic -- ``freely falling observers maximise proper time'' -- gives the wrong answer, while the older heuristic of velocity and gravitational time dilation, applied in a single frame, gets it right immediately. The resolution involves conjugate points and the distinction between local and global extremality of geodesics, but the moral is the same as Bell's: do not let a newer slogan overwrite a perfectly sound older intuition.

2026-07-19T12:41:06Z 11 pages, 1 figure. Accepted for publication in the American Journal of Physics Henrique Gomes http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17086v1 2026-07-19T05:44:01Z

Any viable interpretation of quantum theory needs to account for the Born rule, from which the theory gets its probabilistic empirical predictions. In this paper, we give an overview of possible approaches to this problem in the context of the Many Worlds interpretation. We argue that, for structural reasons, none of them can possibly succeed. More precisely, we argue that the Many Worlds interpretation must obtain the Born rule by proceeding either axiomatically, deductively, or inductively, and that all three of these approaches run into general, fundamental obstructions.

2026-07-19T05:44:01Z 22 pages, no figures; to appear in The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy and the Multiverse Emily Adlam Jacob A. Barandes http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16825v1 2026-07-18T14:01:10Z

I rivisit the history of the first matter-antimatter collider built in Italy in 1960 and carried to success through an inter-European collaboration with France, underlying the foundational role of the Austrian born theoretical physicist Bruno Touschek. Touschek's life path through Europe before and after World War II is briefly recalled. The role of CERN in jump-starting this international collaboration between the Frascati National Laboratories in Italy and the Orsay Linear Accelerator Laboratory in France, is highlighted through historical documents, and contributions from interviews with the main protagonists of Touschek's game-changing proposal.

2026-07-18T14:01:10Z 10 pages, 5 figures, from a presentation at 2025 Colloque Haissinski, IJCLab, Orsay, France Giulia Pancheri http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16584v1 2026-07-18T01:56:34Z

As a fundamental arena for the development of his dynamics, Newton postulated the existence of absolute space, in which bodies innately possess absolute velocity. Despite this, Newton argued that, although real, absolute properties cannot be detected. Since then, the claim that absolute velocity would be undetectable in such a Newtonian universe has been generally accepted. Here, we show that standard arguments for such a claim, beginning with the one offered by Newton himself, beg the question. We conclude that there are no formal reasons to believe that absolute velocity would be undetectable in a Newtonian universe.

2026-07-18T01:56:34Z 14 pages Jorge Manero Ricardo Muciño Elias Okon http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16379v1 2026-07-17T16:15:58Z

One of us is a realist and believes that reality fundamentally consists in an external physical world, governed by laws of physics. Observers are either emergent (physicalism) or exist in addition to physical reality. The other defends a version of idealism and believes that reality fundamentally consists in first-person states, unembedded into worlds, on which laws of nature act directly. Shared "physical worlds" are merely emergent. The disagreement ultimately centers on the overall coherence of a formal model, known as Algorithmic Idealism, and its ability to resolve observer paradoxes, such as the Boltzmann brain paradox. Our aim is to confront this issue in the form of an adversarial collaboration, where we avoid misunderstanding each other, so that readers can see the true source of the disagreement, and decide for themselves. Our work represents an attempt to establish a form of exchange that may help overcome the fragmentation of scholarly communities in philosophy, physics, and elsewhere. The collaboration was conducted using a discipline-neutral template for theoretical adversarial collaboration developed in a companion paper [1], which we hope will be useful in other theoretical disciplines.

2026-07-17T16:15:58Z 19 pages. Please note the companion paper "Theoretical adversarial collaboration: a template" Kelvin J. McQueen Markus P. Mueller http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16374v1 2026-07-17T15:17:37Z

Adversarial collaborations have become increasingly prominent in empirical science, where proponents of competing theories jointly design experiments capable of discriminating between them. Much less attention has been given to theoretical disputes that cannot readily be resolved by experiment. We distinguish theoretical adversarial collaboration from its empirical counterpart and propose a five-step template for conducting it. The procedure is designed to move disputants beyond familiar critique-reply-rejoinder exchanges by requiring sustained clarification, supervised steel-manning of the target theory, and the collaborative development and refinement of objections. Its condition for success is that the collaboration produce insights that substantially exceed the existing literature: either novel, non-obvious arguments show that the theory can meet the objections, or the theory's advocate concedes that new conceptual resources or revisions are required. The template was developed through reflection on, and implemented in, our own adversarial collaboration in philosophy and foundations of physics. We offer it here as a general framework for constructive and publishable progress in philosophy, foundational science, and other areas of inquiry in which disputes cannot readily be resolved by experiment.

2026-07-17T15:17:37Z 6 pages, 1 template Kelvin J. McQueen Markus P. Mueller http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14928v1 2026-07-16T12:43:45Z

In 2019, the first image of a black hole's shadow based on observation was released by the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration (EHT). This paper shows that despite the EHT's emphasis on a single image as its final result, there were countless plausible ways of rendering the data, among which researchers could not easily choose. To obtain a single image from the extremely noisy and sparse data, it was necessary to select one of multiple plausible approaches, or to average the results from different approaches, at each stage of data processing. We examine the epistemic and aesthetic choices involved at various stages, and explore what the images would have looked like if the EHT had made different choices. We suggest that the most valuable evidence produced by the EHT comes not from the single image it ultimately advertised as its central result, but from the demonstration of the limited variability that emerged from the specific choices made.

2026-07-16T12:43:45Z To appear in Philosophy of Physics Rodrigo Ochigame Emilie Skulberg Jeroen van Dongen