https://arxiv.org/api/Spkbw9YarL/ObclW0xV6eaSHvQQ 2026-06-17T08:03:52Z 5620 705 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02839v2 2024-10-07T16:42:37Z

We critically discuss the claims of a recent article regarding the Newtonian limit of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) in pure-tetrad formulation (arXiv:2406.17594). In particular, we refute this article's purported main result that if a regular Newtonian limit exists, the torsion of the limiting derivative operator (i.e., connection) necessarily vanishes.

2024-10-03T09:35:07Z Comment on arXiv:2406.17594. 12+2 pages (main text + references). v2: typos corrected Philip K. Schwartz Arian L. von Blanckenburg http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07235v1 2024-10-05T08:56:03Z

This text was supposed to be included in the book "50 years of the renormalization group, Dedicated to the Memory of Michael E. Fisher", edited by A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, D. Huse and L. Radzihovsky, World Scientific, Singapore (2024). It will be included in future printings and in the electronic version of the book.

2024-10-05T08:56:03Z This text was supposed to be included in the book "50 years of the renormalization group, Dedicated to the Memory of Michael E. Fisher", edited by A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, D. Huse and L. Radzihovsky, World Scientific, Singapore (2024). It will be included in future printings and in the electronic version of the book Amnon Aharony Mustansir Barma http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04053v1 2024-10-05T06:19:54Z

This article provides information about the factors that necessitated the need to adjust the calendar during the time of Umar Khayyam, the method of choosing the beginning of the year, and the length of the months. It also attempts to correct the common error associated with @the arrival of the Sun in Aries on Nowruz@.

2024-10-05T06:19:54Z 21 pages, 3 figuras Rizoi Bakhromzod http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03259v1 2024-10-04T09:25:59Z

This paper explores a unique cave art found in southern Puerto Rico that depicts a comet over a tomb. Through interdisciplinary methods, including art interpretation, historical documentation, and demographic analysis, this study uncovered the artist's identity, the societal context of the period, and the potential motivations behind the creation of this art. The investigation revealed a connection to the passage of Halley's Comet in 1910 and the widespread panic it induced.

2024-10-04T09:25:59Z 7 pages, 6 figures. Submitted to the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage Abel Méndez Ángel Acosta-Colón http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02356v1 2024-10-03T10:10:40Z

In this paper I aim to defend one version at least of Hume's dictum: roughly, the idea that possibility is determined by ontology through something like independent variation. My defence is broadly pragmatic, in the sense that adherence to something like Hume's dictum delivers at least three benefits. The first benefit is that, through Hume's dictum, a physical theory's ontology delimits a range of possibilities, that I call \emph{kinematical possibilities}, which serves as a sufficiently permissive notion of possibility to sustain something like an intensional semantics for its claims, and a sufficiently demanding notion of supervenience to sustain plausible claims of inter-theoretic reduction and theoretical equivalence. The second benefit is that Hume's dictum allows us to work backwards from a range of kinematical possibilities to an ontology. This is especially useful when aiming to glean an interpretation of a physical theory, since often we are more confident that we have arrived at the right space of possibilities than that we have arrived at the right ontology. The third benefit is that Hume's dictum -- at least the version I aim to defend here -- may be applied to physical theories more or less as we find them, and therefore we can practice something resembling ontology without having to force our theories into some Procrustean bed, such as a first-order language.

2024-10-03T10:10:40Z Adam Caulton http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02354v1 2024-10-03T10:06:00Z

The claim that a particle is an irreducible representation of the Poincaré group -- what I call \emph{Wigner's identification} -- is now, decades on from Wigner's (1939) original paper, so much a part of particle physics folklore that it is often taken as, or claimed to be, a definition. My aims in this paper are to: (i) clarify, and partially defend, the guiding ideas behind this identification; (ii) raise objections to its being an adequate definition; and (iii) offer a rival characterisation of particles. My main objections to Wigner's identification appeal to the problem of interacting particles, and to alternative spacetimes. I argue that the link implied in Wigner's identification, between a spacetime's symmetries and the generator of a particle's space of states, is at best misleading, and that there is no good reason to link the generator of a particle's space of states to symmetries of any kind. I propose an alternative characterisation of particles, which captures both the relativistic and non-relativistic setting. I further defend this proposal by appeal to a theorem which links the decomposition of Poincaré generators into purely orbital and spin components with canonical algebraic relations between position, momentum and spin.

2024-10-03T10:06:00Z Adam Caulton http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17290v2 2024-10-03T05:13:04Z

Quantum theory in its conventional formulation is notoriously subject to various measurement-related paradoxes, as exemplified by the "Schrodinger's Cat" and "Wigner's Friend" thought experiments. It has been shown, for example by Frauchiger and Renner, that nested measurements such as those occurring in the Wigner's Friend experiment can lead to inconsistencies concerning the putative outcomes of measurements. Such inconsistencies are commonly presumed to remain private and incommensurable, but this is not the case. A counterexample, in which the inconsistencies can be revealed among the observers, is reviewed. The implications for a recent attempt to shield Relational Quantum Mechanics from such inconsistencies are considered, and it is concluded that the attempt is not successful. Further implications for the state of the debate concerning the viability of quantum theory in its various formulations are discussed.

2024-06-25T05:35:32Z Final version, to appear in Philosophy of Physics R. E. Kastner http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01279v1 2024-10-02T06:50:02Z

I argue that scientific determinism is not supported by facts, but results from the elegance of the mathematical language physicists use, in particular from the so-called real numbers and their infinite series of digits. Classical physics can thus be interpreted in a deterministic or indeterministic way. However, using quantum physics, some experiments prove that nature is able to continually produce new information, hence support indeterminism in physics.

2024-10-02T06:50:02Z Original version in French, to appear in the proceedings of the "Colloque Expérience et Vérité(s)" organized by the faculty of theology, Geneva University, September 3-4 2023 Nicolas Gisin http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02560v2 2024-10-01T07:52:43Z

The late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries have long been considered as a formative period for modern Irish political traditions such as nationalism, republicanism and unionism. For Europe it was the time of a turnover in science moving from observation to experiment and from speculation to fact. Richard Kirwan was a well known natural philosopher in Europe and a respected man of science in his time. Throughout all the wars, he was connected with his colleagues in a network reaching across Europe and even to America. Using a few examples, this article is intended to provide an insight how the network worked in a time that was marked by political conflicts and revolutionary events in both science and social life.

2024-04-03T08:29:04Z 17 pages, 4 figures Condensed Matter Physics, 2024, Vol. 27, No. 3, 33101 R. Folk 10.5488/CMP.27.33101 http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00935v1 2024-10-01T01:01:30Z

This is a review of James Read's insightful book, Background Independence in Classical and Quantum Gravity. The book introduces various notions of background-independence which it then makes precise, and uses to make verdicts about background-independence on a wide range of examples of spacetime theories in both classical and quantum gravity. This short book is, in several ways, a worthy example of how technical philosophy of physics ought to be done. I first discuss the content, then raise a number points where I disagree with the book.

2024-10-01T01:01:30Z 9 pages. To appear in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Sebastian De Haro http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00284v1 2024-09-30T23:34:42Z

The present work examines and compares the approaches of Jacob Bernoulli and Leonhard Euler to the problem of ship propulsion generated by internal forces. Jacob Bernoulli's analysis, developed in the late 17th century, relies on geometric interpretations and algebraic relationships to estimate the impulse exerted by a pendulum within a ship. His results, however, are shown to overestimate the force by scaling it with the height of fall rather than the velocity at the end of the fall and by amplifying it with a time dependence factor that proves to be erroneous. Euler's subsequent analysis, conducted nearly 50 years later, provides a more rigorous and mechanically sound treatment of the problem. Utilizing differential equations and a deeper understanding of the principles of motion, Euler demonstrates that no net motion can be generated by internal forces alone, thus refuting the concept of perpetual motion as proposed by Jacob Bernoulli. By comparing the two methodologies, this work highlights the evolution of mathematical and physical analysis from the intuitive but flawed approaches of the early calculus pioneers to the more precise and reliable methods established by later mathematicians. Euler's work not only corrects the errors in Jacob Bernoulli's analysis but also solidifies the understanding that propulsion requires external forces, a conclusion consistent with the laws of Newtonian mechanics.

2024-09-30T23:34:42Z 13 pages, 8 figures Sylvio R. Bistafa http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00283v1 2024-09-30T23:28:36Z

The following translation of Leonhard Euler's "Examination of an Artifice for Propelling a Ship by the Principle of Internal Motion," originally published in 1750, offers a glimpse into a fascinating historical debate in the field of mechanics. This work critically examines a proposal by Jacob Bernoulli, one of the foremost mathematicians of the 17th century, who suggested that a ship could be propelled by forces entirely confined within the vessel itself-a concept that contradicts the principles of classical mechanics. This translation is intended to make Euler's insights accessible to a modern audience, highlighting the enduring relevance of these foundational principles. The commentary provided offers context and clarification, drawing parallels between Euler's work and contemporary understandings of mechanics. By examining the arguments of two of the greatest minds in the history of science, readers are invited to appreciate the depth and precision of classical mechanics as it was developed during the Enlightenment.

2024-09-30T23:28:36Z 17 pages, 6 figures Sylvio R. Bistafa http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00932v1 2024-09-30T22:55:37Z

Physicists and philosophers are increasingly prone to regarding our current physical theories as providing 'effective descriptions' of real-world systems. In the context of quantum gravity research, this fuels a common view that the classical spacetime theory of general relativity provides effective descriptions where it is successfully applied. That common view of general relativity, in turn, encourages an 'effective' understanding of spacetime emergence. But descriptions of spacetime in general relativity irreducibly include global physical content, which is not effective. Recognizing this fact reigns in the interpretive scope of the common view of general relativity and specifically undermines our thinking about spacetime emergence effectively.

2024-09-30T22:55:37Z Accepted version, Philosophy of Physics Mike D. Schneider http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01846v1 2024-09-30T16:28:44Z

One of the main claims of the paper is that Dirac's calculus and broader theories of physics can be treated as theories written in the language of Continuous Logic. Establishing its true interpretation (model) is a model theory problem. The paper introduces such a model for the fragment which covers ``free theories'', that is physical theories with Gaussian (quadratic) potential. The model is pseudo-finite (equivalently, a limit of finite models), based on a pseudo-finite field in place of the field of complex numbers. The advantage of this unusual setting is that it treats the quantum and the statistical mechanics as just domains in the same model and explains Wick rotation as a natural transformation of the model corresponding to a shift in scales of physical units.

2024-09-30T16:28:44Z Boris Zilber http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.07596v2 2024-09-29T09:29:22Z

I analyze the possibility of free-will in the many-worlds interpretation (MWI), arguing for their compatibility. I use as a starting point Nicolas Gisin's "The Multiverse Pandemic" (preprint arXiv:2210.05377, after Gisin, N., "L'épidémie du multivers", in "Le Plus Grand des Hasards", Belin, Paris, 2010), in which he makes an interesting case that MWI is contradicted by our hard to deny free-will. The counts he raised are: (1) MWI is deterministic, forcing choices on us, (2) in MWI all our possible choices happen, and (3) MWI limits creativity, because everything is entangled with everything else. I argue that each of these features of MWI is in fact compatible with more freedom than it may seem. In particular, MWI allows compatibilist free-will, but also free-will very much like the libertarian free-will defined by Chisholm. I argue that the position that alternative choices exist as possibilities does not make sense from a physical point of view, but MWI offers a physical ground for alternatives.

2022-10-14T07:47:53Z To appear in Foundations of Physics Found Phys 54, 68 (2024) Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica 10.1007/s10701-024-00802-5