https://arxiv.org/api/3HPP/vzoQ6pveoWW/MFKJK4gi8Q 2026-06-15T06:55:20Z 5612 675 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19228v1 2024-10-25T00:32:20Z

In this article I discuss the fragments of Hipparchus' star catalogue and compare them to Hipparchus' Exegesis to trace the early history of stellar catalogues in Greek astronomy.

2024-10-25T00:32:20Z 30 pages Francesca Schironi http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19175v1 2024-10-24T22:07:34Z

QBism is currently one of the most widely discussed 'subjective' interpretations of quantum mechanics. Its key move is to say that quantum probabilities are personalist Bayesian probabilities and that the quantum state represents subjective degrees of belief. Even probability-one predictions are considered subjective assignments expressing the agent's highest possible degree of certainty about what they will experience next. For most philosophers and physicists this means that QBism is simply too subjective. Even those who agree with QBism that the wave function should not be reified and that we should look for alternatives to standard Psi-ontic interpretations often argue that QBism must be abandoned because it detaches science from objectivity. The problem is that from the QBist perspective it is hard to see how objectivity could enter science. In this paper, I introduce and motivate an interpretation of quantum mechanics that takes QBism as a starting point, is consistent with all its virtues, but allows objectivity to enter from the get-go. This is the view that quantum probabilities should be understood as objective degrees of epistemic justification.

2024-10-24T22:07:34Z Philipp Berghofer http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17683v1 2024-10-23T08:56:52Z

The similarity of Mercury to the Moon raises the question on mercurian analogues of lunar transient phenomena. However, since the mid-1960s, this topic has remained out of attention. Nevertheless, the discoveries of the 21st century and the BepiColombo mission give hope for the registration of Mercury transient phenomena. In this regard, it is shown that there are forgotten earth-based observations of anomalous phenomena on Mercury, which now fit into modern knowledge about this planet. Therefore, ALPO could contribute to this mysterious aspect of space exploration.

2024-10-23T08:56:52Z 11 pages, 7 figures Oleksiy Arkhypov http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16855v1 2024-10-22T09:43:39Z

Virtual particles are peculiar objects. They figure prominently in much of theoretical and experimental research in elementary particle physics. But exactly what they are is far from obvious. In particular, to what extent they should be considered "real" remains a matter of controversy in philosophy of science. Also their origin and development has only recently come into focus of scholarship in the history of science. In this study, we propose using the intriguing case of virtual particles to discuss the efficacy of Semantic Change Detection (SCD) based on contextualized word embeddings from a domain-adapted BERT model in studying specific scientific concepts. We find that the SCD metrics align well with qualitative research insights in the history and philosophy of science, as well as with the results obtained from Dependency Parsing to determine the frequency and connotations of the term "virtual." Still, the metrics of SCD provide additional insights over and above the qualitative research and the Dependency Parsing. Among other things, the metrics suggest that the concept of the virtual particle became more stable after 1950 but at the same time also more polysemous.

2024-10-22T09:43:39Z CHR 2024: Computational Humanities Research Conference Michael Zichert Adrian Wüthrich http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15468v1 2024-10-20T18:45:11Z

We consider emergence from the perspective of dynamics: states of a system evolving with time. We focus on the role of a decomposition of wholes into parts, and attempt to characterize relationships between levels without reference to whether higher-level properties are "novel" or "unexpected." We offer a classification of different varieties of emergence, with and without new ontological elements at higher levels.

2024-10-20T18:45:11Z Submitted to a volume on Real Patterns (Tyler Milhouse, ed.), to be published by MIT Press Sean M. Carroll Achyuth Parola http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11027v4 2024-10-18T19:14:51Z

The first Edition of this book was released in 2000, just before the symposium ``Thirty Years of Supersymmetry'' was held at the William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute (FTPI) of the University of Minnesota. Founders and trailblazers of supersymmetry descended on FTPI, as well as a large crowd of younger theorists deeply involved in research in this area. Since then 23 years have elapsed and significant changes happened in supersymmetry (SUSY). Its history definitely needs an update. Such an update is presented below. The Second Edition of the revised collection will be released in 2024.

2024-01-19T20:58:14Z 16 pages, 7 figures. V. 2: A few references added; some minor insertions added V.3: Foreword to the First Edition is added for comparison. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:hep-ph/0102298 V.4: One reference added in footnote 9, page 8 M. Shifman http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13819v1 2024-10-17T17:47:14Z

Recent developments in foundations of physics have given rise to a class of views suggesting that physically meaningful descriptions must always be relativized to a physical perspective. In this article I distinguish between strong physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all facts must be relativized to a perspective, and moderate physical perspectivalism, which maintains that all empirically meaningful descriptions must be relativized to a perspective. I argue that both scientific evidence and philosophical considerations support moderate physical perspectivalism over strong physical perspectivalism. In particular, motivations connected to epistemic humility and the social nature of science are more compatible with the moderate approach.

2024-10-17T17:47:14Z Philos. sci. 92 (2025) 624-645 Emily Adlam 10.1017/psa.2024.73 http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13781v2 2024-10-16T17:06:00Z

Einstein's happiest thought was his leap from the observation that a falling person feels no gravity to the realization that gravity might be equivalent to acceleration. It affects all bodies in the same way because it is a property of spacetime -- its curvature -- not a force propagating through spacetime (like electromagnetic or nuclear forces). When expressed in a way that is manifestly independent of the choice of coordinates, this idea became General Relativity. But the ground for what is now known as the "equivalence principle" was laid long before Einstein, affording a fascinating example of the growth of a scientific idea through the continuous interplay between theory and experiment. That story continues through the present era, with improved techniques and measurements, and in the new environment of space. Theoretically, equivalence is now understood to rank with Lorentz invariance as one of nature's most fundamental principles. Violations of equivalence are generically predicted by attempts to unify gravity with "non-geometrical" fundamental interactions, but there is no consensus on the form that these violations will take. Experimental tests of equivalence thus face the challenge of striving simultaneously for the highest possible sensitivity and diversity in test materials.

2022-09-28T02:17:26Z 20 pages, 4 figures; http://www.minkowskiinstitute.com/MIM/Equivalence.pdf Minkowski Institute Magazine, 9 October 2024 Paul Worden James Overduin http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.14604v4 2024-10-16T11:35:07Z

Since the discovery of quantum mechanics, the fact that the wavefunction is defined on the $3\mathbf{n}$-dimensional configuration space rather than on the $3$-dimensional space has seemed uncanny to many, including Schrödinger, Lorentz, and Einstein. Even today, this continues to be seen as a significant issue in the foundations of quantum mechanics. In this article, it will be shown that the wavefunction is, in fact, a genuine object on space. While this may seem surprising, the wavefunction does not possess qualitatively new features that were not previously encountered in objects known from Euclidean geometry and classical physics. The methodology used involves finding equivalent reinterpretations of the wavefunction exclusively in terms of objects from the geometry of space. The result is that we will find the wavefunction to be equivalent to geometric objects on space in the same way as was always the case in geometry and physics. This will be demonstrated to hold true from the perspective of Euclidean geometry, but also within Felix Klein's Erlangen Program, which naturally fits into the classification of quantum particles by the representations of spacetime isometries, as realized by Wigner and Bargmann, adding another layer of confirmation. These results lead to clarifications in the debates about the ontology of the wavefunction. From an empirical perspective, we already take for granted that all quantum experiments take place in space. I suggest that the reason why this works is that they can be interpreted naturally and consistently with the results presented here, showing that the wavefunction is an object on space.

2021-11-29T15:37:13Z Symmetry. 2024; 16(10):1379 Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica 10.3390/sym16101379 http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12892v1 2024-10-16T09:47:22Z

This paper is an exploration of the nuanced realm of reference frames within the framework of General Relativity. Our analysis exposes a violation of Earman's SP1 principle in scenarios involving fields that are dynamically uncoupled, a common assumption for reference frames. Unlike other violations, we cannot foreclose it by eliminating background spacetime structure. Our analysis also leads us to challenge the conventional notion of partial observables as quantities that are associated with a measuring instrument and expressed within a coordinate system. Instead, we argue that a partial observable is inherently relational, even if gauge-variant, and needs dynamical coupling with other partial observables to form a bona-fide, gauge-invariant complete observables. This perspective allows us to distinguish between being relational and being gauge-invariant, two properties that are often conflated.

2024-10-16T09:47:22Z Nicola Bamonti Henrique Gomes http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11809v1 2024-10-15T17:35:41Z

The theory of band offsets at semiconductor interfaces has been one of Alfonso Baldereschi most cherished topics, to which he has made significant contributions, both directly and by enticing peers and disciples, including myself, to delve deeply into it. In this tribute, I recount how a brilliant idea of his for modeling band offsets in a class of semiconductor heterojunctions led to one of our most cited works and brought about the birth of pseudopotential alchemy. This model provides a powerful tool to both compute and fathom the electronic and structural properties of composite semiconductors, such as heterojunctions and alloys, by treating them as small perturbations with respect to a virtual crystal, a system in which different chemical elements occupying crystallographically equivalent lattice sites are represented by an average pseudopotential. This note is intended as a tribute to the fond memories I have of the time spent with, and the science learned from, Alfonso. No attempt will be made at bibliographic completeness in the niche field of pseudopotential alchemy, let alone the much broader one of semiconductor heterojunctions.

2024-10-15T17:35:41Z 4 pages, unabridged version of a contribution to a volume in honor of the memory of Alfonso Baldereschi Stefano Baroni http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06593v2 2024-10-14T22:00:39Z

This paper critically examines the models of scientific discovery propounded by Kuhn, McArthur, Hudson, and Schindler. As an alternative, we proffer the $\unicode{x201c}$change$\unicode{x2013}$driver model$\unicode{x201c}$. It conceives of discoveries as problems or solutions to problems that have epistemically advanced science. Here we take a problem to be generated by a datum that we want to account for and make sense of$\unicode{x2013}$by putting it in contact with our wider web of scientific knowledge and understanding. The model overcomes the shortcomings of its precursors, whilst preserving their insights. We demonstrate its intensional and extensional superiority, especially with respect to the link between scientific discoveries and the dynamics of science. Both as an illustration, and as an application to a recent scientific and political controversy, we apply the considered models of discovery to one of the most momentous discoveries of science: the expansion of the universe.

2023-12-11T18:28:32Z Patrick M. Duerr Abigail Holmes Mills http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10928v1 2024-10-14T16:28:27Z

The upper limit on what is computable in our universe is unknown, but widely believed to be set by the Turing machine -- with a function being physically computable if and only if it is Turing-computable. I show how this apparently mild assumption leads to generous yet binding limits on how quickly or slowly any directly measurable physical phenomenon can grow or converge -- limits that are intimately connected to Rado's Busy Beaver function. I conjecture that these limits are novel physical laws governing which rates of growth and convergence are possible in our universe.

2024-10-14T16:28:27Z 12 pages, 2 figures Toby Ord http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10541v1 2024-10-14T14:20:55Z

This is a brief review article of a seminar given at the International Conference on Gravitation, Astrophysics and Cosmology 2024 (ICGAC-2024), Mathura, India. We begin with a historical survey of some singular solutions in the theory of gravitation, as well as a very brief discussion of how black holes could physically form. Some possible scenarios which could perhaps eliminate these singularities are then reviewed and discussed. Due to the vastness of the field the coverage is not exhaustive, but instead the concentration is on a small subset of topics such as possible quantum gravity effects, non-commutative geometry, and gravastars. A simple singularity theorem is also presented in the appendix. Although parts of the manuscript assume some familiarity with relativistic gravitation or differential geometry, the aim is for the broad picture to be accessible to non-specialists of other physical sciences and mathematics.

2024-10-14T14:20:55Z 21 pages, 5 figures. Review article of a seminar given at the International Conference on Gravitation, Astrophysics and Cosmology 2024 (ICGAC-2024) Particles, 7, 899, (2024) Andrew DeBenedictis 10.3390/particles7040054 http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10903v1 2024-10-13T13:24:44Z

The Theory of Everything ($S_{\text{ToE}}$) seeks to unify all fundamental forces of nature, including quantum gravity, into a single theoretical framework. This theory would be defined internally using a set of axioms, and this paper proposes a set of axioms for any such theory. Furthermore, for such a theory, all scientific truth would be defined internally as consequences derivable from the rules of such a theory. This paper then examines the implications of Tarski's undefinability theorem on scientific truths derived from such axioms. We demonstrate that Tarski's theorem imposes limitations on any such formal system $S_{\text{ToE}}$. However, we also argue that the Lucas-Penrose argument suggests that non-algorithmic understanding can transcend these formal limitations.

2024-10-13T13:24:44Z Accepted for publication in EPL EPL 148 (2024) 3, 39001 Mir Faizal Arshid Shabir Aatif Kaisar Khan 10.1209/0295-5075/ad80c2