https://arxiv.org/api/e3fEhQR8hAFLEYCG3n3epoiko7A 2026-06-15T03:36:01Z 5612 630 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15031v2 2024-12-07T19:54:08Z

This paper combines mathematical, philosophical, and historical analyses in a comprehensive investigation of the dynamical foundations of the formalism of orthodox quantum mechanics. The results obtained include: (i) A deduction of the canonical commutation relations (CCR) from the tenets of Matrix Mechanics; (ii) A discussion of the meaning of Schrödinger's first derivation of the wave equation that not only improves on Joas and Lehner's 2009 investigation on the subject but also demonstrates that the CCR follow of necessity from Schrödinger's first derivation of the wave equation, thus correcting the common misconception that the CCR were only posited by Schrödinger to pursue equivalence with Matrix Mechanics; (iii) A discussion of the mathematical facts and requirements involved in the equivalence of Matrix and Wave Mechanics that improves on F. A. Muller's classical treatment of the subject; (iv) A proof that the equivalence of Matrix and Wave Mechanics is necessitated by the formal requirements of a dual action functional from which both the dynamical postulates of orthodox quantum mechanics, von Neumann's process 1 and process 2, follow; (v) A critical assessment, based on (iii) and (iv), of von Neumann's construction of unified quantum mechanics over Hilbert space. Point (iv) is our main result. It brings to the open the important, but hitherto ignored, fact that orthodox quantum mechanics is no exception to the golden rule of physics that the dynamics of a physical theory must follow from the action functional. If orthodox quantum mechanics, based as it is on the assumption of the equivalence of Matrix and Wave Mechanics, has this "peculiar dual dynamics," as von Neumann called it, this is so because by assuming the equivalence one has been assuming a peculiar dual action.

2024-02-23T00:10:53Z Diana Taschetto Ricardo Correa da Silva http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05456v1 2024-12-06T22:35:45Z

Although entangled state vectors cannot be described in terms of classically realistic variables, localized in space and time, any given entanglement experiment can be built from basic quantum circuit components with well-defined locations. By analyzing the (local) weak values for any given run of a quantum circuit, we present evidence for a localized account of any circuit's behavior. Specifically, even if the state is massively entangled, the weak values are found to evolve only when they pass through a local circuit element. They otherwise remain constant and do not evolve when other qubits pass through their circuit elements. A further surprise is found when two qubits are brought together in an exchange interaction, as their weak values then evolve according to a simple classical equation. The weak values are subject to both past and future constraints, so they can only be determined by considering the entire circuit "all-at-once", as in action principles. In the context of a few basic quantum gates, we show how an all-at-once model of a complete circuit could generate weak values without using state vectors as an intermediate step. Since these gates comprise a universal quantum gate set, this lends support to the claim that any quantum circuit can plausibly be underpinned by localized variables, providing a realistic, lower-level account of generic quantum systems.

2024-12-06T22:35:45Z 17 pages, 6 figures, Comments and References welcome Ken Wharton Roderick Sutherland Titus Amza Raylor Liu James Saslow http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04397v1 2024-12-05T18:12:09Z

In this work we present an invariant-objective formalization of multi screen-entanglement grounded on Tensorial Quantum Mechanics (TQM) [12]. This new tensorial formulation of the theory of quanta -- basically, an extension of Heisenberg's matrix mechanics -- allows not only to escape the many problems present in the current account of multi-partite entanglement grounded on the Dirac-Von Neumann Standard formulation of Quantum Mechanics (SQM) but, more importantly, to consistently represent entanglement phenomena when considering a multiplicity of different screens and detectors.

2024-12-05T18:12:09Z 11 pages Christian de Ronde Raimundo Fernández Mouján César Massri http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12488v2 2024-12-03T17:10:37Z

Both at formal and philosophical levels, decades of efforts have been devoted to a deciphering of the `quantum enigma', the `crazy way quantum objects behave', to quote R.P. Feynman's words. We posit that the enigma cannot recede without resorting to a thorough questioning of the quantum ontology. In the current paper this questioning is introduced through a revisitation of the famous Schrödinger's cat paradox, and of the main attempts at solving it. Our proposal thereof, is that the quantum world enjoys a sound physical reality (complying, in particular, with the scientifc requirement of experimental reproducibility), but also, that this physical reality calls for an enlarged, and however precise notion of `what is real', such that what is real and actual can be distinguished from what is real but potential

2021-03-09T15:15:56Z 20 pages D-M. Cabaret T. Grandou E. Perrier http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06608v6 2024-12-02T17:49:18Z

We show that the ability to consider counterfactual situations is a necessary assumption of Bell's theorem, and that, to allow Bell inequality violations while maintaining all other assumptions, we just require certain measurement choices be counterfactually restricted, rather than the full removal of counterfactual definiteness. We illustrate how the counterfactual definiteness assumption formally arises from the statistical independence assumption. Counterfactual restriction therefore provides a way to interpret statistical independence violation different to what is typically assumed (i.e. that statistical independence violation means either retrocausality or superdeterminism). We tie counterfactual restriction to contextuality, and show the similarities to that approach.

2019-09-14T15:11:17Z 14 pages, 1 figure. Accepted for publication in Journal of Physics Communications, matches accepted version J. Phys. Commun. 8 122001 (2024) Jonte R. Hance 10.1088/2399-6528/ad9b6d http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01404v1 2024-12-02T11:44:37Z

We provide a reply to the Argument from Intimacy on behalf of defenders of emergent spacetime in theories of quantum gravity. We argue that if one accepts that spacetime regions are nowhere in the sense that they are locations but do not have locations, then the Argument from Intimacy can be resolved. We go on to consider a problem with this response, namely that it is unavailable to super-substantivalists. We argue that this is right for identity but not priority super-substantivalists. We then suggest that there is no cost for our solution here, since identity versions of super-substantivalism face severe challenges in the context of spacetime emergence and so should be rejected anyway.

2024-12-02T11:44:37Z Samuel T. Baron Claudio Calosi Cristian Mariani http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18524v1 2024-11-27T17:15:37Z

The meeting patronized by Ernest Solvay in 1911, the first Solvay Council, marked the beginning of what can be called the first quantum revolution. Maurice de Broglie was one of the secretaries of the Council. He participated in the two following conferences and contributed to the third Council with his work. Louis de Broglie collaborated and discussed with his elder brother. Departing from Maurice's achievements, Louis developed his approach to the wave-particle duality of light and extended it to other particles. He presented it at the fifth meeting in 1927. This paper investigates the connection between the two scientists and the Solvay Councils, arguing that this link was essential in developing the first quantum revolution, a process that ended, according to Werner Heisenberg, at the fifth Solvay Physics Council.

2024-11-27T17:15:37Z 46 pages - no figures Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 48 no 1, 2024 Alessio Rocci Franklin J. Lambert http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00097v1 2024-11-27T16:21:39Z

Born in Punjab (India) in December 1941, Balraj Singh is not only the single most prolific nuclear data evaluator and disseminator of nuclear structure and decay data with 148 evaluations in Nuclear Data Sheets -- 85 as the first and often only author -- plus other journals, but his upmost curiosity and dedication brought him to be one of the finest nuclear physicists, with an everlasting influence on many of us. Balraj passed away about a year ago on 9 October 2023 in Ottawa, Ontario (Canada) at the age of 81, and at Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables we would like to commemorate some of his scientific achievements.

2024-11-27T16:21:39Z 2 pages, 1 figure José Nicolás Orce Boris Pritychenko Tibor Kibédi Jun Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14089v2 2024-11-27T09:46:03Z

In recent years, it has been rather fashionable to talk about geometric trinity of gravity. The main idea is that one can formally present the gravity equations in different terms, those of either torsion or nonmetricity instead of curvature. It starts from a very erroneous claim that the Levi-Civita connection, and therefore the (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry itself, are nothing but an arbitrary choice. The point is that, as long as we admit the need of having a metric for describing gravity, the standard approach does not involve any additional independent geometric structures on top of that. At the same time, any other metric-affine model does go for genuinely new stuff. In particular, the celebrated teleparallel framework introduces a notion of yet another parallel transport which is flat. It gives us curious new ways of modifying gravity, even though very often quite problematic. However, in GR-equivalent models, we only get a new language for describing the same physics, in terms of absolutely unobservable and unpredictable geometrical inventions. For sure, one can always safely create novel constructions which do not influence the physical equations of motion, but in itself it does not make much sense and blatantly goes against the Occam's razor.

2024-11-21T12:54:40Z 11 pages; prepared for Proceedings of 11th Mathematical Physics Meeting, September 2024 in Belgrade, Serbia; just a few typos fixed Alexey Golovnev http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17307v1 2024-11-26T10:53:02Z

We agree with the interpretation of W. Schlosser, that the Nebra Sky Disc is a reminder of a method of determining a start date (and possibly also an end date) of the farming year. We extend this interpretation. We think that we found the constellation Taurus on the Disc, which forms by addition of three stars from the constellation Gemini the pattern of a plough of Bronze Age. Moreover we found a line on the disc consisting of the stars epsilon Gem, theta Aur, beta Aur and alpha Aur, which we called the Auriga line. We think that the Nebra people used the Auriga line to determine the day (which we call beta day) on which the Pleiades are vertically below beta Aur at dusk in February. We found a second representation of the Auriga line on the Disc where the distance ratios between the stars are very precisely equal to the distance ratios in the sky, and where the Pleiades are vertically below beta Aur. This proves that the Nebra people must have measured the distances, and that our hypothesis is correct. The beta day could have been used to harmonize a lunisolar calendar with the solar year. However, the most likely possibility seems to us that a good sowing date could be determined by setting the sowing on the second round lunar phase after the beta day. (By round lunar phases we mean the full moon and the new moon.) Such a sowing date makes it possible to start a week count based on the lunar phases with the sowing in order to determine other agricultural dates. The astronomical knowledge for this procedure can be gained by astronomical observations only. No mathematical calculations and import of knowledge from a Mediterranean culture are necessary.

2024-11-26T10:53:02Z 89 pages, 45 tables, 38 figures Bernd Fiedler http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16320v1 2024-11-25T12:12:24Z

When visiting the Museum of Modern Art's special exhibit ''van Gogh and the Colors of the Night (New York, USA, 2008)'' I was impressed by the artist's effort to paint and write about landscapes and life scenes at night. At the same time a clear contrast emerged between the colored Starry Night paint and the darkness or twilight in his earlier production. Since then, while revising van Gogh's artistic production and reading his letters I have come to the conclusion that his work was not only driven by the poetry of the night but also by his awareness of the dawn of astrophysics in the 19th century. A change in the way the artist conceived the sky after his stay in Paris is evident in his later work with the skies becoming more dynamic and rich in colors. In this paper I am presenting new elements in van Gogh's masterpieces that refer to astronomical events visible from France in 1889 and 1890, such as a lunar eclipse and planetary conjunctions. I discuss these elements in addition to the structured and colorful stars and to the large neutral central swirl in the Starry Night, which all suggest the artist's profound attention to celestial phenomena and knowledge of the new wonders and discoveries of astrophysics in 19th century.

2024-11-25T12:12:24Z 17 pages, 8 figures, submitted to the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage Edvige Corbelli http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15975v1 2024-11-24T20:18:02Z

Manifold learning and effective model building are generally viewed as fundamentally different types of procedure. After all, in one we build a simplified model of the data, in the other, we construct a simplified model of the another model. Nonetheless, I argue that certain kinds of high-dimensional effective model building, and effective field theory construction in quantum field theory, can be viewed as special cases of manifold learning. I argue that this helps to shed light on all of these techniques. First, it suggests that the effective model building procedure depends upon a certain kind of algorithmic compressibility requirement. All three approaches assume that real-world systems exhibit certain redundancies, due to regularities. The use of these regularities to build simplified models is essential for scientific progress in many different domains.

2024-11-24T20:18:02Z 33 pages David Peter Wallis Freeborn http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06799v1 2024-11-23T00:22:51Z

The conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics proposes that quantum entities have a conceptual nature, interacting with the material world through processes that are the physical counterpart of the meaning-based processes which typically occur in human cognition. This interpretation emerged from the early developments in quantum cognition, a field that uses quantum mathematics to model human cognitive activity. It benefited from the specific approach taken by the Brussels research group, modeling concepts themselves as quantum entities and minds as measuring apparatuses. The article sketches the essential steps of the intellectual journey going from the first applications of quantum notions and formalisms to human cognition to the proposal of a potentially groundbreaking interpretation of quantum mechanics, offering profound explanations for major quantum phenomena. This was done by drawing numerous parallels with the human conceptual domain and suggesting the existence of a level of cognitive activity that would underlie our physical reality. This means that an increased cross-fertilization between the conceptuality interpretation and quantum cognition is to be expected in the future, both of which are synergistic in furthering our understanding of the nature of reality. This is the first part of a two-part article. In the second part, which can be read independently of the first, the successes of the interpretation will be described in a more systematic way, providing a brief overview of what has been achieved so far.

2024-11-23T00:22:51Z 15 pages, no figures Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci (2025) 383 (2309): 20240382 Diederik Aerts Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi Sandro Sozzo 10.1098/rsta.2024.0382 http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14877v1 2024-11-22T11:59:15Z

I present Astro-HEP-BERT, a transformer-based language model specifically designed for generating contextualized word embeddings (CWEs) to study the meanings of concepts in astrophysics and high-energy physics. Built on a general pretrained BERT model, Astro-HEP-BERT underwent further training over three epochs using the Astro-HEP Corpus, a dataset I curated from 21.84 million paragraphs extracted from more than 600,000 scholarly articles on arXiv, all belonging to at least one of these two scientific domains. The project demonstrates both the effectiveness and feasibility of adapting a bidirectional transformer for applications in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science (HPSS). The entire training process was conducted using freely available code, pretrained weights, and text inputs, completed on a single MacBook Pro Laptop (M2/96GB). Preliminary evaluations indicate that Astro-HEP-BERT's CWEs perform comparably to domain-adapted BERT models trained from scratch on larger datasets for domain-specific word sense disambiguation and induction and related semantic change analyses. This suggests that retraining general language models for specific scientific domains can be a cost-effective and efficient strategy for HPSS researchers, enabling high performance without the need for extensive training from scratch.

2024-11-22T11:59:15Z 7 pages, 4 figures, 1 table Arno Simons http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12562v3 2024-11-22T09:47:24Z

Wolfram's hypergraph dynamics should replace outmoded models in physics. This should even more so be the case if experimental evidence for the theory is found (which I believe is probable). However, due to the breadth and depth of the theory, it may be difficult to produce experimental evidence which falsifies it. Some of Wolfram's personal work relating to his physics project is philosophical, and so mechanics of particular phenomena in the natural world can become a triviality or an aside. In other words, the general theory "casts a wide net", and it is the philosophical topics I will challenge. I find that Wolfram must adopt a radical epistemology through his so-called Observer Theory because there is no clear notion of Truth. Tegmark believes in an objective Truth, but I find its relation to the observer untenable, and the proof of his Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH) is gematria. I argue both Wolfram and Tegmark conflate the inherent potential of mathematical truths with their instantiation or actuality in reality, making a similar error to that of the "so-called" Pythagoreans rebuked by Aristotle. Nonetheless, I believe that combinatorial structures of the kind used in the physics project (abstract rewriting, directed acyclic graphs) will be the future of physics as we know it.

2024-11-19T15:27:19Z 18 pages, 5 figures Joseph Natal