https://arxiv.org/api/bCe+CkstS57t2h4n55LH2F8Wy2E 2026-06-15T02:29:52Z 5612 615 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19760v1 2024-12-27T17:41:52Z

We exploit the results of Bamonti and Gomes (2024) concerning the dynamical (un)coupling of reference frames to gravity to analyse the role of reference frames in the Hole Argument. We introduce a new possible threat to determinism, which we call Arbitrariness Problem (ARB), resulting from the inherent freedom in selecting a reference frame.

2024-12-27T17:41:52Z Nicola Bamonti Henrique Gomes http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19231v1 2024-12-26T14:18:07Z

This is a short historical note about the visit of Prof. G. Klipping of Fritz Haber Institute, Germany, to the low temperature physics laboratory of Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. During his visit in 1979, Klipping delivered a series of lectures on cryogenic practices and low temperature physics in the physics department. The authors, both Masters degree students at that time, with a specialization in cryogenics, attended these lectures arranged by Prof. R. Srinivasan then head of the Low Temperature laboratory. In this non technical note, the authors attempt to portray the research philosophy and attitudes of Klipping as captured through many wise remarks and snippets which formed an integral part of his lectures. In the 1970-80s Klipping made invaluable contributions to the development of cryogenics research in India.

2024-12-26T14:18:07Z This arxiv upload is an embellished version of a short historical note that was published in Current Science (Indian Academy of Sciences) and can be found at https://currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/127/12/1454.pdf The published version has a more formal title "Gustav Klipping visits IIT Madras" and lacked two essential photographs -- now included in the arxiv version Current Science, Volume 127, Issue 12, 1454, (2024) Bellave S. Shivaram Usha Sinha http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19182v1 2024-12-26T11:41:13Z

This short note addresses the criticisms recently proposed by Shan Gao against our article "On the Reality of the Quantum State Once Again: A No-Go Theorem for ψ-Ontic Models" (Found. Phys. 54:14). The essay aims to respond to such objections and to show once again that the theorem proved in our paper is correct, and therefore true - contrary to Gao's claims. Philosophical consequences of this fact are briefly discussed.

2024-12-26T11:41:13Z Accepted for publication in Foundations of Physics Gabriele Carcassi Andrea Oldofredi Christine A. Aidala http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18030v1 2024-12-23T22:50:57Z

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton, "for foundational discoveries and inventions that enable machine learning with artificial neural networks." As noted by the Nobel committee, their work moved the boundaries of physics. This is a brief reflection on Hopfield's work, its implications for the emergence of biological physics as a part of physics, the path from his early papers to the modern revolution in artificial intelligence, and prospects for the future.

2024-12-23T22:50:57Z William Bialek http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04230v2 2024-12-23T11:12:16Z

This paper began as a set of notes introducing quantum physicists of the QBist persuasion to enactive theory. Unlike mainstream cognitive science, which views cognition as computations on internal representations of the external world (and thus the mind as in the head), the enactive approach sees cognition as adaptive, embodied action. Enaction can ground concepts of experience, agency, knowledge, and normativity - which play key roles in QBist quantum mechanics - in terms consistent with QBism's participatory approach. That's because QBism and enaction both reject an absolute, pregiven subject-object split: for QBism, quantum measurement is the enactment of the subject-object divide; for enaction, cognition is the enactment of that divide. Indeed, each appears to be half of the same story. QBism is a theory of how the world is created and recreated through interactions with an agent, while enaction is a theory of how agents are created and recreated through interactions with the world. Through conversations with QBists and enactivists, these notes evolved into a larger project aimed at unifying QBist physics with enactive cognitive science. Taken together, they offer the possibility of a unified metaphysics - one that brings subject and object, mind and world, back together again.

2024-11-05T03:51:27Z 23 pages, typos corrected Amanda Gefter http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16885v1 2024-12-22T06:33:34Z

The first quantum string theories were developed around 1970, prior to the discovery of QCD, with the goal of producing a theory of hadrons. Basic physical requirements and mathematical consistency of the string theories known at that time turned out to require the inclusion of gravity and the existence of extra spatial dimensions. This came as a complete surprise to everyone who was involved. It led to a completely new and very ambitious goal for string theory research, namely a unified quantum theory of gravity and all other forces. In particular, this goal requires that the string tension is 20 orders of magnitude larger than was previously envisioned. Fifty years later, this goal is widely shared.

2024-12-22T06:33:34Z 16 pages; Submitted to "Fields, Gravity, Strings and Beyond: In Memory of Stanley Deser" John H. Schwarz http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14882v1 2024-12-18T16:08:53Z

The history of the discovery of nuclear fission and how science fiction had anticipated it.

2024-12-18T16:08:53Z published November 2024 in Czech translation in Krakatit 100, a celebration of the novel's centenary (Jitka Cejkova, editor) Julyan H. E. Cartwright http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13404v1 2024-12-18T00:38:28Z

In recent years, the hope to confirm the existence of dark matter by experimentally detecting it has diminished significantly. After more than 30 years of experimental searches, many of the most promising candidates have since been ruled out, leaving the epistemic and scientific condition of dark matter in a state of suspension. In efforts to improve the epistemic justification for the dark-matter hypothesis, physicists have turned to philosophical arguments and historical narratives. In this paper, I explicate two such strategies -- explanatory unification and historical continuity -- applied in the context of dark matter. I argue that greater care and attention should be invested in the explanatory arguments to increase their strength, and that a survey of primary historical sources in astronomy renders the historical evidence for the continuity of dark matter substantially weaker. The quality and rigor of the philosophical and historical arguments which physicists are constructing could be substantially improved by increasing interdisciplinary practices.

2024-12-18T00:38:28Z Simon Allzén http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00022v1 2024-12-16T19:52:29Z

This paper explores the intersection of identity, individuality, and reality through competing frameworks, including classical metaphysics, quantum mechanics, and computational theories. Traditional metaphysical notions of fixed identity are challenged by advancements in cloning, teletransportation, and digital replication, which reveal the fluid and relational nature of individuality. Quantum mechanics further complicates these notions, emphasizing the indistinguishability and contextuality of fundamental particles. Computational approaches, such as the Ruliad and Constructor Theory, offer expansive views of emergent realities but often lack practical constraints for observer relevance. Algorithmic idealism is introduced as a unifying framework, proposing that reality is an emergent construct governed by computational rules prioritizing coherence, sufficiency, and observer-dependent experiences. By redefining identity as an informational construct and reality as a process shaped by algorithmic transitions, algorithmic idealism resolves foundational paradoxes and offers a superior lens for understanding existence in an increasingly digital and interconnected world. The framework bridges gaps between competing theories, providing a coherent and pragmatic model for addressing ethical, metaphysical, and technological challenges.

2024-12-16T19:52:29Z 20 pages, 24 references Krzysztof Sienicki http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20485v1 2024-12-16T17:33:43Z

Algorithmic idealism represents a transformative approach to understanding reality, emphasizing the informational structure of self-states and their algorithmic transitions over traditional notions of an external, objective universe. Rooted in algorithmic information theory, it redefines reality as a sequence of self-state transitions governed by principles such as Solomonoff induction. This framework offers a unified solution to longstanding challenges in quantum mechanics, cosmology, and metaphysics, addressing issues like the measurement problem, the Boltzmann brain paradox, and the simulation hypothesis. Algorithmic idealism shifts the focus from describing an independent external world to understanding first-person experiences, providing epistemic interpretations of physical theories and dissolving metaphysical divides between "real" and simulated realities. Beyond resolving these conceptual challenges, it raises profound ethical questions regarding the continuity, duplication, and termination of informational entities, reshaping discussions on identity, consciousness, and existence in the digital and quantum age. By offering a mathematically rigorous yet philosophically innovative framework, algorithmic idealism invites a rethinking of reality as an emergent property of informational dynamics rather than a static external construct.

2024-12-16T17:33:43Z 17 pages, 27 references Krzysztof Sienicki http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11425v1 2024-12-16T03:50:33Z

J. Willard Gibbs published a book in 1902 on statistical mechanics that quickly received significant attention from his contemporaries because of the reputation that he had secured with his prior work on thermodynamics. People reading Gibbs's book were often familiar with Ludwig Boltzmann's work on the kinetic theory of gases. This article looks at the published response to Gibbs's book in the decade following its publication. What did these readers get from reading Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics? How did they put that to use? Was it fruitful? Samuel H. Burbury had been strongly critical of the assumptions on which Boltzmann's theory was built and had expressed a need for a theory without them. Burbury was pleased with the foundation and rigor of Gibbs's approach, since in his first three chapters he had built on analytical mechanics in the Hamiltonian formulation, a many-body dynamical system. Others found Gibbs hard to understand and some were critical. Hendrik A. Lorentz began teaching Gibbs's dynamical theory and supervised a thesis by Leonard Ornstein in which Orenstein developed applications built on grand canonical ensembles and correlations, which were contrary to Boltzmann's molecular disorder. Ornstein and Zernike expanded on material in that thesis to develop a theory of critical opalescence without infinities.

2024-12-16T03:50:33Z 20 pages, 1 figure Bruce D. Popp http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10028v3 2024-12-14T20:30:08Z

Stephen Hawking's derivation of Hawking radiation relied on one particular spacetime model, that of a star collapsing into a black hole which then remains in existence forever. He then argued that Hawking radiation implies this model should be thrown away in favour of a different model, that of an evaporating black hole. This aspect of Hawking's argument is an example of an idealization that is pervasive in the literature on black hole thermodynamics, but which has not yet been widely discussed by philosophers. The aim of this paper is to clarify the nature of Hawking's idealization, and to show a sense in which it leads to a paradox. After identifying this idealization paradox in classic derivations of Hawking radiation, I go on to show how various research programmes in black hole thermodynamics can be viewed as possible resolutions to the paradox. I give an initial analysis of the prospects for success of these various resolutions, and show how they shed light on both the philosophical foundations of both Hawking radiation on the nature of idealizations in physics.

2024-04-15T12:24:56Z 29 pages, 7 figures, preprint (accepted for publication in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science) Dominic Ryder http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11109v2 2024-12-13T17:08:45Z

This work explores a pataphysical approach to the concept of space and time, inspired by Aristotelian philosophy and the insights of John Wheeler. We propose the "Physics of Pears", a theory that conceives space as a graph and time as a measure of change, within a geometrodynamical context. The goal is to stimulate reflections on the nature of physical laws and the boundaries between physics and metaphysics.

2024-11-17T15:57:21Z Marcello Poletti http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19816v1 2024-12-13T00:31:23Z

Recent observations of interplanetary scintillation (IPS) at radio frequencies have proved to be a powerful tool for probing the solar environment from the ground. But how far back does this tradition really extend? Our survey of the literature to date has revealed a long history of scintillating observations, beginning with the oral traditions of Indigenous peoples from around the globe, encompassing the works of the Ancient Greeks and Renaissance scholars, and continuing right through into modern optics, astronomy and space science. We outline here the major steps that humanity has taken along this journey, using scintillation as a tool for predicting first terrestrial, and then space weather without ever having to leave the ground.

2024-12-13T00:31:23Z 4 pages, 1 figure. Submitted for publication in proceedings of IAU Symposium 390: A Multi-Point view of the Sun: Advances in Solar Observations and in Space Weather Understanding. From a talk given at the XXXII IAU General Assembly, Cape Town Emily F. Kerrison Ron D. Ekers John Morgan Rajan Chhetri http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06669v1 2024-12-09T17:08:38Z

Commercial endeavours have already compromised our relationship with space. The Artemis Accords are creating a framework that will commercialize the Moon and further impact that relation. To confront that impact, a number of organizations have begun to develop new principles of sustainability in space, many of which are borne out of the capitalist and colonial frameworks that have harmed water, nature, peoples and more on Earth. Indigenous methodologies and ways of knowing offer different paths for living in relationship with space and the Moon. While Indigenous knowledges are not homogeneous, there are lessons we can use from some of common methods. In this talk we will review some Indigenous methodologies, including the concept of kinship and discuss how kinship can inform our actions both on Earth and in space.

2024-12-09T17:08:38Z 7 pages, accepted for publication in "Astronomy and Satellite Constellations: Pathways Forward", proceedings of IAU Symposium 385 Hilding Neilson