https://arxiv.org/api/iC7m0lGD6eb668TML1LXFnYEB2Q 2026-09-10T21:20:33Z 5718 60 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09650v5 2026-08-06T05:55:14Z

We propose an extended structural dynamics framework that enriches classical mechanics by treating particle orientation and internal structure as fundamental phase-space coordinates. This extension preserves Hamiltonian structure and Liouville invariance while revealing two distinct mechanisms for entropy production: (i) collisional randomization through orientation-dependent scattering (generalizing Boltzmann), and (ii) continuous geometric instability arising from rotational-deformational coupling. We argue this dual-mechanism structure provides a dynamical justification for the molecular chaos assumption central to Boltzmann-Lanford derivations, particularly in regimes (dense systems, few bodies, structured particles) where classical point-particle theory fails. Recent mathematical advances (Deng, Hani & Ma 2024) extend Lanford's theorem to arbitrary times but still require molecular chaos as input and apply only to dilute gases. This extended structural framework addresses the complementary philosophical question: how can molecular chaos itself emerge from deterministic dynamics? We show that geometric instability in extended phase space makes entropy-decreasing trajectories dynamically unstable, offering a structural explanation for the Second Law. This reframes thermodynamic irreversibility as a geometric property of structured motion rather than a purely statistical postulate.

2025-05-13T10:48:06Z Title and and appendices updated Patrick BarAvi http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04893v4 2026-08-05T02:10:52Z

The quantum measurement problem, i.e. the apparent conflict between unitary quantum evolution and non-unitary, stochastic wave-function collapse, remains unresolved a century after the formulation of quantum mechanics. We first review the standard picture, from the Copenhagen prescription with its Heisenberg cut, through von Neumann's movable cut, to environment-induced decoherence, which explains the emergence of stable classical records but still presupposes the Born rule and therefore cannot by itself replace the measurement postulates. We then connect this problem to the Maximum Entropy Principle in two complementary ways. First, decoherence drives the measurement apparatus toward the least biased state compatible with the dynamically protected pointer distribution, so that the emergent collapse may be viewed as a thermodynamic relaxation toward constrained maximum entropy. Second, we propose a Timeless Histories formulation of quantum mechanics in which the primitive objects are ordered sequences of events rather than evolving wave functions. Their conditional probabilities are assigned, relative to specified refinements, by a single Born-Boltzmann rule that combines the quadratic structure of Born's rule with Boltzmann's counting of equally probable microstates. The textbook form of Born's rule, the projection postulate, density operators, and wave functions are then recovered as derived informational constructs, while collapse becomes Bayesian conditioning on recorded events. Time and space enter only subsequently through unitary translation symmetry. Because the probability rule is postulated independently of any physical collapse or classical observer, decoherence is no longer asked to justify the rule used to interpret its own reduced states, and can be invoked to explain the approximate additivity and stability of macroscopic records, i.e. the emergence of classicality.

2023-11-08T18:54:34Z 23 pages, 2 figure, substantially revised Alexei V. Tkachenko http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14689v2 2026-08-04T15:55:54Z

The experimental observations that led to the development of hadron physics are reviewed with emphasis on the discoveries of mesons and baryons, starting in the 1940s with the pion and kaon which mediate the strong hadronic force. The evidence for an internal structure consisting of two or three elementary spin 1/2 particles will be reviewed. In 2003 more complex multi-quark hadrons began to emerge. The subsequent developments beyond the early 2000s are covered in the Review of Particle Physics (Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 41 (2026) 2630011). Given the large number of hadrons, the choice of key experiments is somewhat subjective.

2025-03-15T13:11:47Z 21 pages, 35 figures Encyclopedia of Particle Physics 2026 (1st edition) Claude Amsler http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02837v1 2026-08-03T19:51:11Z

We present preliminary results of the analysis of the precise spatial orientation of colonial Christian churches located in the city of Las Palmas, capital of the island of Gran Canaria (Spain), and its surroundings. Our sample consists of 27 churches, 15 of which belong to the city proper while the rest are situated within roughly 12 km away inland. Most of these churches were constructed between the first decades after the Castilian conquest of the island, and the end of the 19th century. In our analysis we examine whether these orientations respond to calendrical coincidences, to the main features of the landscape, or whether the standard tradition was followed regarding the orientation of the churches' apses eastwards. We find that no church in the sample is oriented towards points of the horizon on which the Sun rises on the day of the patronal feasts. Furthermore, we find no correlation between the global orientation pattern and the orography of the island which, near the local prominent Guiniguada ravine, could have been an important factor at the time of the construction of the churches. What we do find is that most of the orientations fit within the solar range, mainly to the east but also with a few historic churches oriented towards the west, while less than 20% have astronomical declinations outside of this range. In the statistical analysis, the declination histogram for the sample shows a pattern where the apses of the churches point consistently to the north of due east. This might signal constructions that were oriented to the rising Sun on dates close to Easter. We briefly discuss the implications these findings may have for a future study of the rest of Gran Canaria, which includes several dozens of historic churches scattered throughout the valleys, slopes, and volcanic calderas of the island.

2026-08-03T19:51:11Z To be published in Between ancient and modern Astronomy, S. Iwaniszewski et al. (eds.), Warsaw: Warsaw University, 2026 Alejandro Gangui Jose Ricra Joaquin Pallares Juan Antonio Belmonte http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02542v1 2026-08-03T17:30:13Z

Some authors have argued that spacetime in general relativity should be given a radically different interpretation from the ones given to spacetime in other theories in virtue of it being a gauge theory. In this article I review this sort of argument and argue against this view. That is, I argue that spacetime in general relativity can be understood analogously to spacetime in other models and that the argument from the diffeomorphism invariance of the theory misapplies the concepts of gauge theory to a context in which they are of limited application.

2026-08-03T17:30:13Z Synthese 208, 84 (2026) Álvaro Mozota Frauca 10.1007/s11229-026-05677-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14316v2 2026-08-02T15:52:25Z

In this paper we approach the problem of superdeterminism from a novel point of view, highlighting its character as a more metaphysical than scientific proposition. First, we introduce a distinction between two types of superdeterministic theories, naïve (NSD) and metaphysical (MSD), and argue how NSD presents significant epistemic flaws. We show how NSD justifies itself through claims to fundamentality, thus connoting itself as a metaphysical theory rather than a scientific one. We finally illustrate that the most developed MSD model so far, Invariant Set Theory, implicitly proposes a confused form of priority monism. Our paper thus reinforces the thesis that theories should demonstrate rather than assume fundamentality and that it is methodologically flawed for a theory to assume its own fundamentality for the sole purpose of defending against criticisms.

2026-01-19T12:38:54Z 24 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in Philosophy of Science, matches accepted version Gabriele Cafiero Luca Molinari Jonte R. Hance http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00406v2 2026-08-01T03:13:22Z

Methods of selecting samples from larger populations may produce bias, in either direction: inducing correlations between variables independent in the full population, or masking correlations between variables dependent in the full population. Here we propose a surprising application of these familiar ideas. We argue that they are relevant to puzzling correlations uncovered in quantum theory by John Stewart Bell (Bell 1964). In the light of Bell's work and subsequent experiments it is widely believed that the quantum world is 'nonlocal', in apparent tension with relativity. Many hold that the only alternative is to abandon 'realism', the view that there is an objective world independent of measurement. We propose instead that Bell's correlations are selection artefacts, in tension neither with relativity nor realism. In standard two-particle Bell experiments the relevant selection is a preselection, achieved by the preparation of the initial state. Again, selection bias via preselection is familiar elsewhere in science, but it doesn't seem to have been noticed that it is applicable in this case.

2026-05-01T04:54:54Z 27 pages, 13 figures; this version revises and clarifies the argument in several places, and adds a new Appendix. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2602.16985 Huw Price http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29497v1 2026-07-31T15:03:46Z

While Erwin Schroedinger's contributions to quantum mechanics and other areas of theoretical physics are very well known, his works as a poet and literary writer are usually ignored. In this paper I reconsider his poetry and refer to a few poems written about him. A short fragment of a Galileo-inspired dialogue that Schroedinger published in 1955 is as interesting as it is puzzling and little known. The dialogue is essentially about atomic theory as known much earlier, namely in the early 1910s. Indeed, there is the slight possibility that Schroedinger may originally have conceived it at that time and even composed a version of it. Apart from considering the origin and reception of the manuscript, I analyze its content from the point of view of the history of physics.

2026-07-31T15:03:46Z 12 pages, 1 figure Helge Kragh http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21015v2 2026-07-31T10:06:53Z

Quantum theory implies, and empirical evidence confirms, that while particles $\textit{can}$ exhibit wave-like behavior in interferometric experiments, this behavior is so limited as $\textit{not}$ to allow for third- and higher-order interference. The article at hand shows that this possibility-impossibility structure suggests the universal validity of a principle that regulates statistical correlations between spatiotemporally localized events, $\textit{independently}$ of the nature of the objects that may or may not partake in these events. Roughly, the said principle mandates that $\textit{any}$ joint influence of $m$ mutually spacelike separated events on $\textit{another}$ event, be such, that it can be separated by $\textit{at least}$ $\lceil \frac{m}{2} \rceil$ mediating events, and in some cases, by $\textit{no more}$ than $\lceil \frac{m}{2} \rceil$ mediating events. The structure of quantum interference thus teaches us that events can influence each other in a non-separable fashion, but that this non-separability has a certain exactly quantifiable limit.

2025-10-23T21:45:40Z Final version; 35 pages + References + Appendix, 5 figures Found Phys 56, 41 (2026) Sebastian Horvat 10.1007/s10701-026-00938-6 http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28512v1 2026-07-30T16:50:35Z

350 years from the 1676 announcement of the Roemer's discovery that light propagates with finite speed, we present our observations using eyes with telescopes having similar resolution compared to those in the late 17th century. We confirmed that Roemer's method is valid and gives reasonable values for the speed of light c, within about 10 per cent of the modern value for our measurements, even with the simplest modelling technique, using uniform circular motions. We found that increasing the complexity of the model, e.g., by taking into account the elliptical orbit of Jupiter, does not necessarily bring the results closer to the value of c due to the influence of other perturbations. Using modern ephemerides yields a noticeably accurate result of c=(298200+-1900) km/s. This experience can have great didactic value by showing the interconnections between formulation of hypotheses and the consequent predictions, making observations, reducing data, and searching for alternative explanations for the same phenomenon. Lastly, we also found, in the correspondence between Roemer and Huygens, that Roemer in 1677 searched for an independent confirmation of what he found during previous years observing Io's eclipses by making observations and reducing the data of the meridian transits of the Great Red Spot on Jupiter.

2026-07-30T16:50:35Z 11 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables. Author-formatted version of the article published in European Journal of Physics 47 (2026) 025802 European Journal of Physics 47 (2026) 025802 Fabio Falchi Riccardo Furgoni Paolo Gattillo Maurizio Francesio 10.1088/1361-6404/ae3f66 http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27794v1 2026-07-30T07:27:07Z

AI is accelerating physics discovery, but perhaps away from Einstein-level theory building. To understand this gap, we must recognize a striking trend: while being very successful, the most visible AI contributions to physics discovery appear to mirror the historical development of physics, but in reverse. Human discovery in physics progressed, in broad strokes, from ancient pattern prediction, through phenomenological laws such as Kepler's, to principle-based universal theories such as relativity and the Standard Model. On the AI side, prominent contributions to physics discovery point in the opposite direction: early milestones emphasized explicit equation-discovery methods, such as symbolic regression, whereas more recent frontier contributions are powerful predictors such as AlphaFold and GraphCast, which can be remarkably accurate yet do not provide clear theoretical understanding. If this trend continues, AI would become extraordinarily good at prediction but may struggle to ever propose its first serious contender to quantum gravity or other paradigm-level theories. We review the current landscape of AI for physics discovery and highlight a critical missing skill: the ability to pose the right questions or invent the right principles to guide the development of new theories and the tests to falsify them. This mode of discovery has driven many of the deepest advances since the 17th century, where symmetry, simplicity, and new mathematical frameworks guided theory construction before experimental tests. Equipping AI systems with such skills could move them from predicting within known frameworks to proposing the next paradigm-level discovery in physics.

2026-07-30T07:27:07Z Michael Shalyt Nathan Regev Marin Soljačić Ido Kaminer http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27297v1 2026-07-29T16:08:35Z

The Faddeev--Popov procedure poses two conceptual puzzles. \emph{Puzzle~(1)}: if gauge-equivalent configurations represent the same physics, the quotient $\F/\G$ should suffice to compute physical amplitudes --- yet the procedure requires anti-commuting auxiliary fields, the ghosts, with no analogue on the quotient. What structure of $\F$ do they encode? \emph{Puzzle~(2)}: gauge-fixing was supposed to eliminate local gauge symmetry, yet the gauge-fixed theory retains BRST --- a residual symmetry that acts on the gauge potential as an infinitesimal gauge transformation. Why does it survive? Both puzzles dissolve together. Following \textcite{Dougherty2021} and \textcite{DoughertyRead2026}, I take ghosts to encode classical content of $\F \to \F/\G$, but identify a different structure: a principal connection $\varpi$ on this bundle. The ghost is $\varpi$; the BRST operator is the vertical exterior derivative on field space; the Maurer--Cartan equation is its vertical Cartan structure equation. The Faddeev--Popov calculus draws only on $\varpi$'s vertical content, which the algebraic reading also captures; $\varpi$'s horizontal content, on which the Vilkovisky--DeWitt programme rests, supplies the cross-orbit pairing that gauge-fixing, dressing-based quantisation, and counterfactual comparison require and the quotient discards. BRST is the rigid, vertical symmetry that preserves this pairing; this is why it survives gauge-fixing.

2026-07-29T16:08:35Z Henrique Gomes http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25535v1 2026-07-28T10:18:44Z

The construction of the DUMAND, Lake Baikal and IceCube detectors of high-energy neutrinos are discussed, with some emphasis on the difficulties encountered. The decade from 1990 marked the period in which the Auger Observatory was conceived and the Collaboration evolved. Again, the difficulties that were overcome to create the Observatory are described. For both IceCube and the Auger Observatory, claims made in the 1980s for the observation of PeV gamma-rays from Cygnus X-3, played a not-insignificant role in their advance.

2026-07-28T10:18:44Z 12 pages, 5 figures, Based on talk at 4th Symposium on History of Particle Physics, CERN, November 2025 A A Watson http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24901v1 2026-07-27T16:56:47Z

This paper argues that the geometry-first and symmetry-first formulations of gauge theory are not equivalent. They differ in three respects. First, the geometry-first formulation---in which gauge groups arise as automorphism groups of structured fundamental vector bundles---admits fewer theories when its generating structures are restricted to finite tensorial data. Charged theories with additive structure group $\mathbb{R}$ have no such presentation. Second, even when a symmetry-first theory has a geometry-first presentation, its principal bundle and matter bundles do not determine which structured vector bundles generated the gauge group. Third, the natural functor from geometry-first generating objects to principal bundles with matter is faithful but neither essentially surjective nor full. Essential surjectivity fails for the diagonal quotient of the Standard Model gauge group on what I call `the classical menu', and for the additive-$\mathbb{R}$ examples on every finite tensorial menu. Fullness fails for a real oriented fibre $\mathbb{R}^{2m}$: the principal-bundle category admits the outer automorphism of $SO(2m)$ induced by an improper orthogonal map, but no structure-preserving fibre map induces it.

2026-07-27T16:56:47Z 27 pages Henrique Gomes http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21695v1 2026-07-23T18:00:00Z

I argue that dimensional analysis can appropriately be thought of as a gauge theory. This picture naturally leads to the usual quantity calculus through inherent properties of Lie groups, Lie algebras, and representation theory. The gauge theory interpretation is perhaps strongest for non-constant units. I explain how Stevens's classification of scales of measurement can be understood by choices of different gauge groups. Finally, I reinterpret and rephrase the Buckingham-Π Theorem in a way that also applies to typical gauge theories. Counting the number of ''Π''s becomes a well-known problem of invariant theory.

2026-07-23T18:00:00Z 55 pages, comments are welcome! Benjamin Muntz