https://arxiv.org/api/iC7m0lGD6eb668TML1LXFnYEB2Q 2026-06-09T23:25:23Z 5605 60 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17545v1 2026-04-19T17:13:55Z

Recently arxiv:2604.12897 urged that the terminology "neutrinoless double beta decay" should be changed to "Majorana double beta decay" to properly give credit to Majorana, and to focus on the positive aspects of the phenomenon -- supposed creation of matter in the laboratory -- rather than the negative: absence of something, embarrassment over false claims of detection, and a "sociology of suspicion." I argue that the current terminology is more accurate and descriptive, and that the claimed reasons for its adoption are lacking in credibility.

2026-04-19T17:13:55Z 1 page, comment on arxiv:2604.12897 James M. Cline http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15638v2 2026-04-18T12:33:00Z

The year 2025 marked the centennial of quantum mechanics, inaugurated by Heisenberg's matrix formulation and the foundational contributions of Pauli, Schrodinger, and Dirac. Concurrently, 2026 marks the centennial of the Klein - Gordon equation, the second-order relativistic wave equation from which both the Schrodinger and Dirac equations were derived. This article supplements the recent review published in J.Phys. A: Math.Theor.,58 (2025) 053001 by providing a more detailed examination of the formative period 1925 - 1928, with particular attention to contributions that have received insufficient recognition in the standard narrative. We reconstruct Kramers' independent derivation of the Dirac equation - obtained essentially simultaneously with Dirac's own result yet unpublished for seven years - and discuss its relation to Van der Waerden's group-theoretical approach. The role of Charles Galton Darwin in elucidating the physical content of the Dirac equation is also highlighted. In addition, we present two modern derivations not catalogued in the earlier review: one based on Operational Dynamical Modeling, which deduces the Dirac equation from relativistic Ehrenfest relations and the canonical commutation algebra, and one rooted in the Madelung hydrodynamic formulation. Three broad periods of quantum theory development -- foundational, consolidation, and the modern era of quantum information -- are briefly surveyed.

2026-02-27T20:03:51Z 22 pages Volodimir Simulik Denys I. Bondar http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14319v2 2026-04-17T12:55:43Z

In the literature, there are two differing definitions of contextuality: Kochen and Specker's, and Spekkens' (or ``generalised''). However, researchers using one of these definitions rarely consider the other, meaning comparative analysis of these two notions is rare. In this paper, we advance the idea that Kochen-Specker contextuality provides a generalisation of the idea of system being fundamentally nonclassical, while Spekkens' noncontextuality provides a generalisation of the idea of a system being classical. This allows us to reconcile the two approaches, as different stages in a hierarchy of classicality/nonclassicality.

2026-04-15T18:22:06Z 16+14 pages, 2+1 figures. v2. Fig 1a fixed, added brief discussion of related results for (un)steerability Enrico Bozzetto Jonte R. Hance http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16151v3 2026-04-16T18:09:44Z

In Yang-Mills theory on a Euclidean Cauchy surface, the physical gauge group is often taken to be $\mathcal{G}^I/\mathcal{G}^\infty_0$, where $\mathcal{G}^I$ consists of boundary-preserving gauge transformations asymptoting to a constant, and $\mathcal{G}^\infty_0$ consists of transformations generated by the Gauss law constraint. We rigorously derive this physical gauge group for both Abelian and non-Abelian theories. A key result is that restricting to $\mathcal{G}^I$ follows from the structure of the instantaneous state space on which the instantaneous Lagrangian is defined. We extend our analysis to Yang-Mills-Higgs theory, showing that boundary conditions and the physical gauge group differ between the unbroken and broken phases.

2025-02-22T08:52:12Z 25 pages; major revision (v3); matches resubmission to SciPost Physics Silvester Borsboom Hessel Posthuma http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15404v1 2026-04-16T14:19:23Z

This paper develops a conditional framework for understanding the emergence of measurable physical structure from a pre-metric domain. Contemporary physics provides powerful and precise descriptions of relations among already-defined observables, yet offers comparatively little on the prior question of how observability, separability, and metric structure themselves arise. I propose that if three-dimensional spacetime is the result of an asymmetric projection from a non-orientable pre-geometric regime grounded in a minimal invariant, then a determinate and internally constrained set of consequences follows. These include: time reinterpreted as projection asymmetry rather than as a dimension or entropy gradient; matter as stabilised residue of projection rather than ontological primitive; quantum correlation as pre-separable unity dissolved by non-orientable topology; black holes as regimes of projection saturation rather than information sinks; dark matter as structured lag in the projection process rather than undetected particle species; and gravity as metric tension at sites of high projection density. The framework does not claim empirical confirmation. Its claim is that the proposal is internally coherent, structurally constrained, capable of generating non-trivial research directions, and that several phenomena currently treated as anomalous or paradoxical become expected consequences of the architecture rather than problems requiring additional postulates. An annex presents candidate formal objects and identifies research obligations for each consequence.

2026-04-16T14:19:23Z 9 pages Jonathon Sendall http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01942v2 2026-04-15T14:45:13Z

Philosophers have claimed that: (a) Born-Oppenheimer approximation methods for solving molecular Schrödinger equations violate the Heisenberg uncertainty relations; therefore, (b) `quantum chemistry' is not fully quantum; and (c) therefore chemistry does not reduce to physics. This paper analyses the reasoning behind Born-Oppenheimer methods and shows that they are internally consistent and fully quantum mechanical, contrary to (a)-(c). Our analysis addresses important issues of mathematical rigour, physical idealization, reduction, and classicality in the quantum theory of molecules, and we propose an agenda for the philosophy of quantum chemistry more grounded in scientific practice.

2024-11-04T10:08:49Z Nick Huggett James Ladyman Karim P. Y. Thébault 10.1017/psa.2026.10213 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00515v3 2026-04-15T12:42:09Z

Assembly theory (AT) introduces causation as a material property and establishes a metrology for objects produced by evolution and selection. The physical scale of causation is quantified by the assembly index, defined as the minimum number of recursive steps necessary to make an object. Observing countable copies of high assembly index objects indicates a mechanism producing them is persistent, such that the object's environment constructs a memory that traps causation within a contingent chain. Copy number and assembly index together underlie a standardized metrology for detecting causation (assembly index) and contingency (copy number). These allow a precise definition of an assembly threshold that demarcates life (and its derivative agential, intelligent, and technological forms and artifacts) as structures with persistent copies in regimes of deep causal possibility. In introducing a fundamental concept of material causation to quantify and measure life, AT represents a departure from prior theories of causation, such as interventional ones, which have so far proven incompatible with fundamental physics. We discuss how AT's concept of causation provides the foundation for a theory of physics that allows precise and testable concept of "life", and in which novelty, contingency and the potential for open-endedness are fundamental, and determinism is emergent from selection along assembled lineages.

2026-01-02T00:20:53Z 65 pages, 8 Figures, 83 references Leroy Cronin Sara I. Walker http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14234v1 2026-04-14T20:26:22Z

Consciousness and quantum mechanics are among the most puzzling phenomena studied in the sciences. Some scholars suggest they are related, though others think this claim commits a "minimization of mystery" fallacy. The aim of this programmatic paper is to draw attention to a less widely discussed parallel between consciousness and quantum mechanics: both challenge the classical objectivist worldview of science. Under certain assumptions, they are each in tension with a package of metaphysical theses -- "non-relationalism", "non-fragmentation", and "one world" -- that jointly make up that worldview. This points to three distinct non-objectivist responses: the "relationalist", "fragmentalist", and "many-subjective-worlds" ones. We will map out their pros and cons.

2026-04-14T20:26:22Z 36 pages, 1 figure, 1 table John B. DeBrota Christian List http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12897v1 2026-04-14T15:46:16Z

The term 'neutrinoless' is a cornerstone of modern particle physics, yet it defines a fundamental process by what is missing rather than what is created. We trace the origins of this privative neologism to a 1953 experimental claim and show how a 'sociology of suspicion' transformed Ettore Majorana's affirmative ontology into an agnostic shorthand. By examining this linguistic shift, we argue that our current terminology may obscure the profound physical meaning of the search. Reclaiming the language of 'matter creation' is not merely a semantic choice, but a timely conceptual shift to bridge the gap between experimental caution and the radical character of the laws of nature we aim to uncover.

2026-04-14T15:46:16Z 6 pages, 3 figures. This essay traces the origins of the neologism 'neutrinoless' to the 1950s and proposes returning to the affirmative language of 'matter creation'. Accepted for publication in 'Giornale di Fisica' Francesco Vissani http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21159v2 2026-04-14T13:41:24Z

String field theory is supposed to stand to perturbative string theory as quantum field theory stands to single-particle quantum theory; as such, it purports to offer a substantially more general and powerful perspective on string theory than the perturbative approach. In addition, string field theory has been claimed for several decades to liberate string theory from any fixed, background spatiotemporal commitments -- thereby (if true) rendering it `background independent'. But is this really so? In this article, we undertake a detailed interrogation of this claim, finding that the verdict is sensitive both to one's understanding of the notion of background independence, and also to how one understands string field theory itself. Although in the end our verdicts on the question of the background independence are therefore somewhat mixed, we hope that our study will elevate the levels of systematicity and rigour in these discussions, as well as equip philosophers of physics with a helpful introduction to string field theory and the variety of interesting conceptual questions which it raises.

2025-09-25T13:44:24Z 54 pages Bhanu Narra James Read Matěj Krátký http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.13135v1 2026-04-14T07:55:42Z

Roman Schnabel's article argues that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox can be resolved by identifying a flaw in what the author calls the "EPR implication" and by using radioactive alpha decay as an example showing that predictability does not exclude genuine randomness. The paper is clearly written and addresses an important foundational question. In our view, however, its main conclusion does not follow. The article narrows the original EPR argument, attributes too much to Bell-inequality violations, and replaces the central EPR structure - which involves incompatible observables and locality-based reasoning - with a simpler case of correlated random events. The result is an interesting interpretive remark, but not, we think, a satisfactory scientific resolution of the EPR problem.

2026-04-14T07:55:42Z 4 pages, 10 references Mikołaj Sienicki Krzysztof Sienicki http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12094v1 2026-04-13T22:09:34Z

I argue that there is a straightforward way to understand the occurrence of wavefunction collapses or 'quantum events' in relational approaches to quantum mechanics: we necessarily encounter a discontinuity in our description when a system interacts with the reference relative to which we are describing it, since the reference system cannot be described relative to itself. This makes it clear how recent concerns around quantum events in relational quantum mechanics should be resolved. However, the solution requires accepting that quantum mechanics is not a complete description of all physical facts, and moreover I argue that this is most likely inevitable if we want to be able to give a precise description of quantum events.

2026-04-13T22:09:34Z Emily Adlam http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11826v1 2026-04-11T12:07:46Z

During the voyages that led him to discover the new continent bearing his name, Amerigo Vespucci made interesting astronomical observations of the southern sky. In the past, his data have been interpreted with criteria that do not follow Vespucci's indications, resulting in identifications that are not credible or even leading to the assertion that the data themselves are incomprehensible. However, it is possible to construct a coherent picture of all the information, arriving at an identification that is in some cases very probable, in other cases almost certain, of the stars described by Vespucci. Analysis of documents shows that he made good-quality measurements, but his incomplete knowledge of ancient texts prevented him from distinguishing the new stars from the already known ones, giving rise to a period of confusion in 16th century celestial cartography.

2026-04-11T12:07:46Z 10 pages, 9 figures Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 28(4), 901-910 (2025) Davide Neri 10.3724/sp.j.1440-2807.2026.01.03 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11823v1 2026-04-11T10:33:40Z

According to various no-go results in the foundations of quantum mechanics, for any system associated to a Hilbert space of dimension higher than two, it is not possible to assign definite truth values to all propositions pertaining to the system without generating a Kochen-Specker contradiction. In this respect, the Bub-Clifton uniqueness theorem is utilized for arguing that truth-value definiteness is consistently restored with respect to a determinate sublattice of propositions defined by the state of the quantum system concerned and a particular observable to be measured. On this basis, a perspectivist/contextual account of truth valuation in the quantum domain is produced that satisfies Tarski's criterion of material adequacy for a theory of truth. In light of the latter, perspectivist truth conforms to perspective or context-bound correspondence of a de re nature, designating locally an objectively existing state of affairs. Such an account derives by virtue of the microphysical nature of physical reality in displaying a context-dependence of facts; thus, it essentially opposes a non-perspectival, metaphysically fixed point of reference, or a panoptical standpoint from which to state all facts of nature.

2026-04-11T10:33:40Z 18 pages. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2511.05504, arXiv:1504.01544 European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2026, 16:14 Vassilios Karakostas 10.1007/s13194-026-00725-0 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09826v1 2026-04-10T18:57:32Z

In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a thought experiment that is entirely correct, has been demonstrated in real experiments, and is now the most famous in quantum physics. Their pioneering work described, for the first time, quantum correlations and can be regarded as a very early glimpse into today's 'deep' quantum technologies, by which I mean those that enhance functionality by making use of quantum correlations. However, their work also contains a paradox that Erwin Schroedinger had already recognised as such in 1935 and which has since been cemented by the so-called Bell experiments. Here, I am now able to pinpoint the origin of the paradox within the chain of reasoning, which ultimately resolves the paradox.

2026-04-10T18:57:32Z Roman Schnabel