https://arxiv.org/api//YglCo0cwuJBT2aZHufqjNHkvGE 2026-06-15T00:09:04Z 5610 585 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13218v2 2025-01-28T03:57:35Z

In Everettian quantum mechanics, justifications for the Born rule appeal to self-locating uncertainty or decision theory. Such justifications have focused exclusively on a pure-state Everettian multiverse, represented by a wave function. Recent works in quantum foundations suggest that it is viable to consider a mixed-state Everettian multiverse, represented by a (mixed-state) density matrix. Here, we develop the conceptual foundations for decoherence and branching in a mixed-state multiverse, and extend arguments for the Born rule to this setting. This extended framework provides a unification of 'classical' and 'quantum' probabilities, and additional theoretical benefits, for the Everettian picture.

2023-07-25T03:10:53Z Accepted version, Synthese Synthese 205, 160 (2025) Eugene Y. S. Chua Eddy Keming Chen 10.1007/s11229-025-04949-0 http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05228v4 2025-01-27T23:17:11Z

The problem of relating the mathematics of probability theory to the empirical world of experiments has been debated for centuries. One of the oldest solutions proposed for this problem is a principle that states that an event with probability close to 1 nearly certainly occurs in a single trial of an experiment. This principle is now called $\textit{Cournot' principle}$. Cournot's principle was first formulated in the context of classical probability, in which the probability of any event is given, and the $\textit{product rule}$, i.e., the rule that the probability that two events occur in two separated trials is the product of their probabilities, can be deduced. On the contrary, in the modern measure-theoretic approach to probability, probability measures and experiments are separate entities that must be related in an appropriate way, and the product rule cannot be deduced. In this paper, a version of Cournot's principle suitable for measure-theoretic probability is proposed. Therefore, the principle is reformulated as a criterion for relating probability measures and experiments, and the product rule is explicitly stated. In spite of the vagueness of the notions involved, the new version is formulated in a rigorous manner and an exact result, namely, that at most one probability measure can be related to an experiment, is rigorously proven.

2024-10-07T17:36:26Z 9 pages. Changes: further simplifications, improved mathematical rigor, title changed. Latest version: further improvements Bruno Galvan http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16020v1 2025-01-27T13:05:11Z

The modern Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics describes an emergent multiverse. The goal of this paper is to provide a perspicuous characterisation of how the multiverse emerges making use of a recent account of (weak) ontological emergence. This will be cashed out with a case study that identifies decoherence as the mechanism for emergence. The greater metaphysical clarity enables the rebuttal of critiques due to Baker (2007) and Dawid and Thébault (2015) that cast the emergent multiverse ontology as incoherent; responses are also offered to challenges to the Everettian approach from Maudlin (2010) and Monton (2013).

2025-01-27T13:05:11Z 22 pages, 1 figure Philosophy of Science. 2024: 91, 288-309 Alexander Franklin 10.1017/psa.2023.155 http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15884v1 2025-01-27T09:14:01Z

In 1492, for the first time, an unknown ocean opened up before sailors: weeks of navigation and no idea how to pinpoint their location. Since ancient times, navigators had known how to determine latitude by using the North Star, but the "problem of longitude" was different. More than a century later, Galileo Galilei discovered in Padua Jupiter's satellites and quickly realized that a sailor who could observe their eclipses would know his own longitude. Yet his brilliant insight was 400 years ahead of the technology of his time. Impractical at sea, on land this idea became a formidable tool for cartography and ushered in the age of the image of the world. Today the technique can be realized thanks to artificial satellites, and the Tuscan genius' name has reached space with the European satellite system named Galileo. An exhibition in Paris, organized by the Permanent Representation of Italy to the International Organizations, Sorbonne University, and the Galileo Museum in Florence, and directed by Asia Ruffo di Calabria of the Musee des Arts et Metiers, by Quentin Cheval-Galland of the Sorbonne University, and by Alessandro De Angelis, allowed visitors to observe inventions of the time and some writings by Galileo on the theme of geolocation. The exhibition was held in Paris in June 2024. It was replicated in Prague in October 2024, in Amsterdam in December 2025, and at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Canada, in February 2025.

2025-01-27T09:14:01Z Prometeo 166, June 2024 Alessandro De Angelis http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15226v1 2025-01-25T14:10:48Z

This paper provides a novel metametaphysical approach to quantum indeterminacy. More specifically, it argues that bivalent quantum logic can successfully account for this kind of indeterminacy, given the non-truth-functional character of its disjunction. Furthermore, it suggests that the determinable-based account of quantum indeterminacy illustrates precisely this possibility.

2025-01-25T14:10:48Z Draft of 03.03.2023. Comments welcome! Claudio Calosi Iulian D. Toader http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13674v1 2025-01-23T13:57:09Z

These notes contain -- apart from some physics -- scattered reminiscences of everyday life at the Institute for Theoretical Physics in Göteborg in the early eighties. The text has been in the making for many years. Some of it was written inspired by the Lars Brink 70-fest at The Solvay Institute in Brussels in 2014, but was never finished or published. Parts of the old text has now been replaced by a review of the quite unexpected recent renaissance for light-front higher spin theory. Lars sadly did not live to experience more than the very beginnings of this quite remarkable development. The text was finalized in the spring of 2023.

2025-01-23T13:57:09Z Contribution to a memorial volume for Lars Brink, to be published by World Scientific International Journal of Modern Physics A, 19 Dec. 2024 Anders K H Bengtsson 10.1142/S0217751X24470055 http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13494v1 2025-01-23T09:16:26Z

Many papers have been published over the years that either conjecture or even (claim to) prove the universality of the form of Maxwell's equations. We present yet another derivation of Maxwell's equations and discuss the conclusions suggested by Maxwell universality, namely the logical inevitability of the Lorentz transformations and the mathematical inconsistency of Newtonian physics.

2025-01-23T09:16:26Z C. Baumgarten http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12870v1 2025-01-22T13:27:05Z

A temporal counterpart to Bell nonlocality would intuitively refer to the presence of non-classical correlations between timelike-separated events. The hypothesis of temporal nonlocality has received recent support in the literature, and its existence would likely influence the future development of physical theories. This paper shows how Adlam's principle of temporal locality can be violated within a protocol involving indefinite causal orders. While the derivations of Leggett-Garg inequalities or the temporal CHSH inequality are said to involve problematic assumptions preventing a targeted probing of a well-defined notion of temporal nonlocality, the present test is free from such worries. However, it is shown that the test, in its current formulation, fails to be fully model-independent. We provide several considerations regarding the physicality of ICOs that could help alleviate this drawback. In the present work, a specific physical interpretation of ICOs in terms of retrocausal influences would explain the presence of temporally nonlocal correlations. It is argued that, as the physical underpinnings of temporal nonlocality might also account for standard Bell nonlocality, focusing on the former as a consequence of ICOs might support under-explored strategies to make sense of the latter.

2025-01-22T13:27:05Z Laurie Letertre http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12200v2 2025-01-21T15:26:48Z

The ultra-relativistic limit of general relativity is Carroll gravity. In this article, we provide (i) a rigorous and thorough exposition of the geometric formalism of the 'magnetic' version of Carroll gravity, (ii) a presentation of this theory as a limit of general relativity in a geometrical, 'lightcone-narrowing' sense, and (iii) an exploration of some of the various conceptually interesting features of this version of Carroll gravity.

2024-09-12T20:59:23Z 29 pages Eleanor March James Read http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11943v1 2025-01-21T07:38:21Z

The experiment performed by Henry Cavendish to measure the density of the earth, is in numerous textbooks described as a measurement of the universal gravitational constant, G, even if we know that this was not true. In this paper, a study on how common this "myth" is based on the checklist developed by Leite on a total of 84 textbooks. The prevalence of the myth in most textbooks throughout the 20th century indicates a focus on the contemporary interests of authors and the physics community in presenting the development of physics. An explanation of the prevalence of the myth and a different approach

2025-01-21T07:38:21Z 14 pages Jonas R Persson http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08727v2 2025-01-20T15:54:12Z

There has been a surge of recent interest in the Wigner's Friend paradox, sparking several novel thought experiments and no-go theorems. The main narrative has been that Wigner's Friend highlights a counterintuitive feature that is unique to quantum theory, and which is closely related to the quantum measurement problem. Here, we challenge this view. We argue that the gist of the Wigner's Friend paradox can be reproduced without assuming quantum physics, and that it underlies a much broader class of enigmas in the foundations of physics and philosophy. To show this, we first consider several recently proposed Extended Wigner's Friend scenarios, and demonstrate that some of their implications for the absoluteness of observations can be reproduced by classical thought experiments that involve the duplication of agents. Crucially, some of these classical scenarios are technologically much easier to implement than their quantum counterparts. Then, we argue that the essential structural ingredient of all these scenarios is a feature that we call "Restriction A": essentially, that a physical theory cannot give us a probabilistic description of the observations of all agents. Finally, we argue that this difficulty is at the core of other puzzles in the foundations of physics and philosophy, and demonstrate this explicitly for cosmology's Boltzmann brain problem. Our analysis suggests that Wigner's Friend should be studied in a larger context, addressing a frontier of human knowledge beyond quantum foundations: to obtain reliable predictions for experiments in which these predictions can be privately but not intersubjectively verified.

2024-02-13T19:00:13Z 23+5 pages, 3 figures. Previous title: "Thinking twice inside the box: is Wigner's friend really quantum?''. v2: substantial clarifications and simplifications; updates to Thought Experiments, now with classical no-go theorem Caroline L. Jones Markus P. Mueller http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08653v1 2025-01-20T06:47:14Z

This work introduces Algorithmic Idealism a framework that reinterprets quantum mechanics as a computational process governed by algorithmic probability informational simplicity and utility optimization Reality is modeled as an agentenvironment feedback loop where agents maximize utility by predicting selfstate transitions Core quantum phenomena such as measurement entanglement and probabilities are explained through informational constructs The paper presents a set of quantum mechanics postulates inspired by this framework and explains their mathematical meaning in detail These postulates include measurement as Bayesian updating entanglement as joint utility optimization and quantum probabilities as utilityweighted predictions Physical laws are shown to emerge as informational regularities from algorithmic constraints By defining identity through decisionmaking consistency and treating simulated and base realities as indistinguishable the framework also resolves philosophical questions about identity and reality This approach unifies quantum mechanics with computational theory offering a novel perspective on foundational physics and its connection to information and computation

2025-01-20T06:47:14Z 29 pages and 24 references Krzysztof Sienicki http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.08143v4 2025-01-19T02:37:52Z

Physical laws are strikingly simple, yet there is no a priori reason for them to be so. I propose that nomic realists -- Humeans and non-Humeans -- should recognize simplicity as a fundamental epistemic guide for discovering and evaluating candidate physical laws. This proposal helps resolve several longstanding problems of nomic realism and simplicity. A key consequence is that the presumed epistemic advantage of Humeanism over non-Humeanism dissolves, undermining a prominent epistemological argument for Humeanism. Moreover, simplicity is shown to be more connected to lawhood than to mere truth.

2022-10-14T23:16:28Z Final version Noûs: 1-31 (2025) Eddy Keming Chen 10.1111/nous.12542 http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19809v2 2025-01-17T00:08:29Z

An overview of the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics is presented, along with an explanation of how it sheds light on key quantum and relativistic phenomena. In particular, we show how the interpretation clarifies Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, wave function-based and entanglement-based nonlocality, interference effects resulting from the superposition principle, delayed choice experiments, quantum measurements, the mechanism of quantization, the reason why entities can establish entanglement bonds, and the statistical behavior of indistinguishable entities. We further argue that the interpretation can also elucidate relativistic effects, focusing on time dilation. Finally, we suggest that it can provide a novel and challenging perspective on evolution. This article is the second in a two-part series devoted to exploring this promising approach to reality. The first part, which serves as a companion to this discussion, outlines the intellectual trajectory leading from the first applications of quantum notions to human cognition to the bold rethinking suggested by the conceptuality interpretation.

2024-11-25T06:05:25Z 19 pages, 3 figures Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci (2025) 383 (2309): 20240381 Diederik Aerts Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi Sandro Sozzo 10.1098/rsta.2024.0381 http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07614v1 2025-01-13T09:22:35Z

The claim that at the so-called Planck scale our current physics breaks down and a new theory of quantum gravity is required is ubiquitous, but the evidence is shakier than the confidence of those assertions warrants. In this paper, I survey five arguments in favour of this claim - based on dimensional analysis, quantum black holes, generalised uncertainty principles, the nonrenormalisability of quantum gravity, and theories beyond the standard model - but find that none of them succeeds. The argument from nonrenormalisability is the most convincing, yet it requires the unwarranted assumption that the same constant of action occurs in every quantum field theory. Therefore, our theories don't (yet) predict that quantum gravity happens at the Planck scale.

2025-01-13T09:22:35Z Caspar Jacobs