https://arxiv.org/api/vXt+RbZuUYYOGnjdsPAnZ4IuUxI 2026-06-14T21:51:15Z 5610 555 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03066v2 2025-02-27T16:54:24Z

A personal recollection of early years in lattice gauge theory with a bias towards chiral symmetry and lattice fermions.

2025-02-05T10:54:52Z v1: Extended write-up of a talk at the 41st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory $Lattice\; 2024$, 28 July - 3 August 2024, Liverpool, UK; 19 pages including 6 for references. v2: added note including two references The European Physical Journal H 50, 5 (2025) Jan Smit 10.1140/epjh/s13129-025-00092-z http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15969v2 2025-02-26T13:59:13Z

The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva is renowned for operating the world`s largest particle accelerator and is often regarded as a model of high-profile international collaboration. Less well known, however, is a key episode from the late 1950s, when CERN was confronted with the research priorities of similar organisations. The issue centred on a CERN-sponsored study group on controlled thermonuclear fusion, which brought together scientists from CERN member states, as well as representatives from the European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM), the European Nuclear Energy Agency (ENEA), and the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). While the CERN Study Group on Fusion Problems succeeded in creating an international network for exchanging reports and coordinating projects to avoid duplication, it ultimately failed to establish joint fusion research programmes. This article explores the reasons behind this outcome to provide insights into intergovernmental power dynamics, underlying competition, and how these factors favoured the creation of a new fusion research institution in the UK, the Culham Laboratory. In doing so, the article contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of science in European integration, while also highlighting that CERN`s involvement in application-oriented research remains an underexplored aspect of its history.

2024-10-21T12:57:42Z Br J Hist Sci 58 (2025) 483-501 Barbara Hof 10.1017/S0007087425101088 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14449v2 2025-02-25T11:21:55Z

The violation of Bell type inequalities in quantum systems manifests that quantum states cannot be described by classical probability distributions. Yet, Bohmian mechanics is a realistic, non-local theory of classical particle trajectories that is claimed to be indistinguishable by observations from more traditional approaches to quantum mechanics. We set up a spatial version of the GHZ system with qubits realised as positional observables that demonstrates that the Bohmian theory fails to match predictions of textbook quantum mechanics (and most likely experients) unless enlarged by a microscopic theory of collapse of the wave function after observation. For this discrepancy to occur it is essential that positions at different times do not commute.

2025-02-20T11:03:38Z 15 pages, v2: added references Robert C. Helling http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18231v1 2025-02-24T16:45:26Z

1. Strong and weak notions of erasure are distinguished according to whether the single erasure procedure does or does not leave the environment in the same state independently of the pre-erasure state. 2. Purely thermodynamic considerations show that strong erasure cannot be dissipationless. 3. The main source of entropy creation in erasure processes at molecular scales is the entropy that must be created to suppress thermal fluctuations ("noise"). 4. A phase space analysis recovers no minimum entropy cost for weak erasure and a positive minimum entropy cost for strong erasure. 5. An information entropy term has been attributed mistakenly to pre-erasure states in the Gibbs formalism through the neglect of an additive constant in the "-k sum p log p" Gibbs entropy formula.

2025-02-24T16:45:26Z 21 pages, 9 figures Philosophy of Physics 3(1)(2025): 3, 1-21 John D. Norton 10.31389/pop.154 http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13620v2 2025-02-22T10:46:48Z

In this paper, we investigate similarities and differences between the main neo-Copenhagen (or "epistemic-pragmatist") interpretations of quantum mechanics, here identified as those defined by the rejection of an ontological nature of the quantum states and the simultaneous avoidance of hidden variables, while maintaining the quantum formalism unchanged. We argue that there is a single general interpretive framework in which the core claims that the various interpretations in the class are committed to, and which they emphasize to varying degrees, can be represented. We also identify, however, remaining differences of a more substantial nature, and we offer a first analysis of them. We also argue that these remaining differences cannot be resolved within the formalism of quantum mechanics itself and identify the more general philosophical considerations that can be used in order to break this interpretation underdetermination.

2022-10-24T21:47:16Z 40 pages Ali Barzegar Daniele Oriti 10.1007/s10701-024-00804-3 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16048v1 2025-02-22T02:51:59Z

We celebrate this year hundred years of quantum mechanics but there is still no consensus regarding its interpretation and limitations. In this article we advocate the statistical contextual interpretation which is free of paradoxes. State vectors and various operators are purely mathematical entities allowing making quantitative probabilistic predictions. State vector describes an ensemble of identically prepared physical systems and a specific operator represents a class of equivalent measurements of a physical observable. A collapse of wave function is not a mysterious and instantaneous physical process. A collapsed quantum state describes a new ensemble of physical systems prepared in a particular way. Probabilities are objective properties of random experiments in which empirical frequencies stabilize. Therefore, quantum probabilities do not provide a complete description of individual physical systems and their interactions. Whether these probabilities can be explained as emergent is an open question which cannot be settled by philosophical discussions and no-go theorems. It can be only answered by more detailed study of experimental data then it is usually done. Bell Tests allowed rejecting Bell local and Bell causal hidden variable models but we even don't know whether quantum probabilities provide a complete description of existing experimental data. Time series of experimental data may contain much more information than it is obtained using empirical frequencies and histograms. Therefore, predictable completeness of quantum mechanics has be tested and not taken for granted.

2025-02-22T02:51:59Z Review article, 21 pages, 130 references Front. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4:1569496 (2025) Marian Kupczynski 10.3389/frqst.2025.1569496 http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04364v2 2025-02-21T17:07:20Z

This paper argues that we ought to conceive of the Dark Energy problem -- the question of how to account for observational data, naturally interpreted as accelerated expansion of the universe -- as a crisis of underdetermined pursuit-worthiness. Not only are the various approaches to the Dark Energy problem evidentially underdetermined; at present, no compelling reasons single out any of them as more likely to be true than the other. More vexingly for working scientists, none of the approaches stands out as uncontroversially preferable over its rivals in terms of its rationally warranted promise, i.e.~the reasons to further work on, explore, and develop it. We demonstrate this claim by applying a Peircean economic model of pursuit-worthiness in terms of a cognitive cost/benefit estimate -- with the instantiation of theory virtues as key indicators of cognitive gains -- to the four main Dark Energy proposals (the cosmological constant approach, modified gravity, quintessence, and inhomogeneous cosmologies). According to our analysis, these approaches do not admit of an unambiguous, or uncontroversial, ranking with respect to which ansatz deserves distinguished attention and research efforts. The overall methodological counsel that our analysis underwrites recommends a pragmatic double research strategy forward: to encourage and foster theory pluralism and the search for tests -- with the goal of enhancing the testability of the $Λ$CDM model and ``testing it to destruction".

2024-03-07T09:49:37Z Updated to match published version in Synthese William J. Wolf Patrick M. Duerr http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14665v1 2025-02-20T16:02:52Z

On a centennial timescale, solar activity was quantified based on records of instrumental sunspot observations. This article briefly discusses several aspects of the recent archival investigations of historical sunspot records in the 17th to 18th centuries. This article also reviews the recent updates for the active day fraction and positions of the reported sunspot groups of the Maunder Minimum to show their significance within the observational history. These archival investigations serve as base datasets for reconstructing solar activity.

2025-02-20T16:02:52Z Hayakawa, H. 2024, The long-term solar variability, as reconstructed from historical sources: Several case studies in the 17th -- 18th centuries, in: Yang, H. J., Lee, H. J. (eds.) Proceedings of "2024 International Symposium on History of Astronomy" (pp. 87-102), Daejeon, KASI [author version] Proceedings of "2024 International Symposium on History of Astronomy" (pp. 87-102) Hisashi Hayakawa 10.18999/2012047 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14612v1 2025-02-20T14:52:11Z

The Modular Neutron Array (MoNA) collaboration was initiated in 2000 at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL) at Michigan State University (MSU). Since then, the collaboration studied properties of nuclides at and beyond the neutron dripline discovering seven new isotopes between lithium to fluorine. The collaboration included liberal arts colleges, regional comprehensive universities, and major research universities with the focus of giving undergraduate students meaningful research experiences. Over the last 25 years, the combined efforts of hundreds of undergraduates, dozens of graduate students and research associates, and faculty from more than a dozen colleges and universities produced over fifty publications, won awards for research, and combined research and teaching in new and interesting ways.

2025-02-20T14:52:11Z A. Banu T. Baumann J. Brown P. A. DeYoung J. Finck N. Frank P. Gueye J. Hinnefeld C. Hoffman A. N. Kuchera B. A. Luther B. Monteagudo-Gudoy T. Redpath A. Revel W. F. Rogers M. Thoennessen http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14575v1 2025-02-20T14:00:36Z

Scientific principles can undergo various developments. While philosophers of science have acknowledged that such changes occur, there is no systematic account of the development of scientific principles. Here we propose a template for analyzing the development of scientific principles called the 'life cycle' of principles. It includes a series of processes that principles can go through: prehistory, elevation, formalization, generalization, and challenge. The life cycle, we argue, is a useful heuristic for the analysis of the development of scientific principles. We illustrate this by discussing examples from foundational physics including Lorentz invariance, Mach's principle, the naturalness principle, and the perfect cosmological principle. We also explore two applications of the template. First, we propose that the template can be employed to diagnose the quality of scientific principles. Second, we discuss the ramifications of the life cycle's processes for the empirical testability of principles.

2025-02-20T14:00:36Z Radin Dardashti Enno Fischer Robert Harlander http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11004v1 2025-02-16T06:08:17Z

When modelling spacetime and classical physical fields, one typically assumes smoothness (infinite differentiability). But this assumption and its philosophical implications have not been sufficiently scrutinized. For example, we can appeal to analytic functions instead, which are also often used by physicists. Doing so leads to very different philosophical interpretations of a theory. For instance, our world would be 'hyperdeterministic' with analytic functions, in the sense that every field configuration is uniquely determined by its restriction to an arbitrarily small region. Relatedly, the hole argument of general relativity does not get off the ground. We argue that such an appeal to analytic functions is technically feasible and, conceptually, not obviously objectionable. The moral is to warn against rushing to draw philosophical conclusions from physical theories, given their drastic sensitivity to mathematical formalisms.

2025-02-16T06:08:17Z 17 pages, to appear in Erkenntnis Erkenntnis 91, 1043-1058 (2026) Lu Chen Tobias Fritz 10.1007/s10670-025-00924-w http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10979v1 2025-02-16T03:47:21Z

Steven Weinberg was a giant of late 20th Century physics on whose shoulders we stand while groping for the science of the 21st Century. This article provides a too-brief summary of a selection of his many achievements -- eight decades of superlative research, eight classic textbooks, eight best-selling forays into popular science writing and more.

2025-02-16T03:47:21Z An abridged version of this article will appear in Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. This version provides a lengthier description of a selection of his accomplishments and includes a number of quotations to give the reader a sense of his own voice C. P. Burgess F. Quevedo http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.10541v1 2025-02-14T20:15:57Z

We evaluate the roles general relativistic assumptions play in simulations used in recent observations of black holes including LIGO-Virgo and the Event Horizon Telescope. In both experiments simulations play an ampliative role, enabling the extraction of more information from the data than would be possible otherwise. This comes at a cost of theory-ladenness. We discuss the issue of inferential circularity, which arises in some applications; classify some of the epistemic strategies used to reduce the extent of theory-ladenness; and discuss ways in which these strategies are model independent.

2025-02-14T20:15:57Z 34 pages, forthcoming in Philosophy of Science Juliusz Doboszewski Jamee Elder http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00005v1 2025-02-14T19:04:56Z

This essay gives a short, informal account of the development of digital logic from the Pleistocene to the Manhattan Project, the introduction of reversible circuits, and Richard Feynman's allied proposal for quantum computing. We argue that Feynman's state-based analogy is not the only way to arrive at quantum computing, nor indeed the simplest. To illustrate, we imagine an alternate timeline in which John von Neumann skipped Operation Crossroads to debug a military computer, got tickled by the problem, and discovered a completely different picture of quantum computing -- in 1946. Feynman suggested we "quantize" state, and turn classically reversible circuits into quantum reversible, unitary ones. In contrast, we speculate that von Neumann, with his background in functional analysis and quantum logic, would seek to "quantize" the operators of Boolean algebra, and with tools made available in 1946 could successfully do so. This leads to a simpler, more flexible circuit calculus and beautiful parallels to classical logic, as we detail in a forthcoming companion paper.

2025-02-14T19:04:56Z 14 pages, many figures, comments welcome David Wakeham http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15090v3 2025-02-13T18:54:58Z

The quantum world is described by a unit vector in the Hilbert space and the Hamiltonian. Do these abstract basis-independent objects give a complete description of the physical world, or should we include observables like positions and momenta and the decomposition into subsystems? According to "Hilbert-space fundamentalism" they give a complete description, and all other features of the physical world emerge from them (Carroll, arXiv:2103.09780). Here I will give a concrete refutation of this thesis based on the symmetries of the theory of quantum measurements. These results show that even if a tensor product structure is assumed along with the unit vector and the Hamiltonian, concrete physically distinct worlds can be described by the same structures.

2023-10-23T16:54:05Z 5 pages. Added a second proof of Lemma 1 using eigenbases, updated references, made minor changes in other places, and a normalization in Lemma 2. Comments welcomed! Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica