https://arxiv.org/api/WaarYEOR0L7dKMw68qaZhBBJsYA2026-06-14T19:51:36Z561052515http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15070v2Feynman 1947 letter on path integral for the Dirac equation2025-03-25T20:48:44ZIn 1947, four months before the famous Shelter Island conference, Richard Feynman wrote a lengthy letter to his former MIT classmate Theodore Welton, reporting on his efforts to develop a path integral describing the propagation of a Dirac particle. While these efforts never came to fruition, and were shortly abandoned in favor of a very different method of dealing with the electron propagator appearing in in QED, the letter is interesting both from the historical viewpoint of revealing what Feynman was thinking about during that period just before the development of QED, and for its scientific ideas. It also contains at the end some philosophical remarks, which Feynman wraps up with the comment, ``Well enough for the baloney.'' In this article I present a transcription of the letter along with editorial notes, and a facsimile of the original handwritten document. I also briefly comment on Feynman's efforts and discuss their relation to some later work.2024-08-27T13:57:51Zv2: edited for clarity, further commentary and references added, matches version published in EPJHTed Jacobsonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19079v1Weak Particle Presence2025-03-24T19:11:15ZThe concept of presence has been extensively explored in philosophy, yet the notion of particle presence within quantum theory remains under-examined. In this article, we explore particle presence through an analysis of a paradox arising from weak measurements. We show that the classical intuition about particle presence involves an erroneous logical combination of propositions from single-time weak values, leading to inconsistencies that result in the deduction of discontinuous trajectories. Instead, we argue that by treating presence as a property defined across time by measuring sequential weak values, the discontinuity paradox is resolved, providing a coherent, non-classical account of particle presence. We discuss some advantages and drawbacks of this account, and consider applications to other cases of trajectory discontinuity.2025-03-24T19:11:15Z30 pages, 5 figures. To be published in Foundations of PhysicsBethany Terris10.1007/s10701-025-00837-2http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03689v1Quantization of the electromagnetic field, entropy of an ideal monoatomic gas, and the birth of Bose-Einstein statistics2025-03-23T08:50:53ZIn 1924, Einstein received a short manuscript in the mail from the Indian physicist S.N. Bose. He quickly translated Bose's manuscript to German and submitted it to Zeitschrift für Physik. Within a few weeks, Einstein presented his own findings (using a generalization of Bose's counting method) to a session of the Prussian Academy of Sciences. Whereas Bose had suggested a new counting method for the quanta of the electromagnetic field -- one that yielded Planck's blackbody radiation formula -- Einstein applied Bose's method to an ideal monoatomic gas. Shortly afterward, Einstein presented to the Academy a follow-up paper in which he described the Bose-Einstein condensation for the first time. The present paper describes some of the fascinating issues that Einstein struggled with as he attempted to unify the quantum-statistical properties of matter with those of the electromagnetic field.2025-03-23T08:50:53Z19 pages, 2 figures, 86 equations, 2 appendices, 9 referencesProceedings of SPIE 13376, Quantum Sensing and Nano Electronics and Photonics XXI, 133760G (2025)Masud Mansuripur10.1117/12.3052584http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20795v1Errico Presutti 1942-20242025-03-21T13:56:42ZErrico Presutti was a leading figure in mathematical physics and an important contributor to rigorous results in statistical mechanics. Due to his strong scientific personality and human qualities, there are many who remember Errico Presutti as colleague, mentor, and friend.2025-03-21T13:56:42ZMemorial for E. PresuttiLorenzo BertiniJoel L. LebowitzMario Pulvirentihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15254v1The localization problem: an antinomy between measurability and causal dynamics2025-03-19T14:28:29ZThe localization problem in relativistic quantum theory has persisted for more than seven decades, yet it is largely unknown and continues to perplex even those well-versed in the subject. At the heart of this problem lies a fundamental conflict between localizability and relativistic causality, which can also be construed as part of the broader dichotomy between measurement and unitary dynamics. This article provides a historical review of the localization problem in one-particle relativistic quantum mechanics, clarifying some persistent misconceptions in the literature, and underscoring the antinomy between causal dynamics and localized observables.2025-03-19T14:28:29Z34 pagesEvan P. G. Galehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05788v2The Waters We Swim In: Replicability and the Evolution of Scientific Norms2025-03-19T10:18:27ZIn recent years, a series of high-profile retractions and fraud cases have arisen in physics, sparking a conversation about research integrity and replicability. Here, we discuss how the practice of science is shaped by the social and political context in which it operates. Reflection on our norms and values could provide a route to create community-driven safeguards that respond to the changing demands in which our research occurs. We propose that collaborations between physicists, philosophers, social scientists, and historians of science could facilitate these reflections and provide new ideas for social science and humanities colleagues.2025-01-10T08:44:46ZHope BretscherNúria Muñoz Garganté10.1038/s42254-025-00816-6http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20851v2Can Bohmian mechanics be considered complete?2025-03-17T20:38:32ZIn this work celebrating the centenary of quantum mechanics, we review the principles of de Broglie Bohm theory, also known as pilot-wave theory and Bohmian mechanics. We assess the most common reading of it (the Nomological interpretation based on the notion of primitive ontology in tridimensional space) and defend instead a more causal and pluralistic approach, drawing on classical analogies with optics and hydrodynamics. Within this framework, we review some of the approaches exploiting mechanical analogies to overcome the limitations of current Bohmian theory and perhaps quantum mechanics itself.2025-02-28T08:49:34ZReview article, submitted for publicationAurélien DrezetArnaud Amblardhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02836v1Comments on `Comment on Aurélien Drezet's defense of relational quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek Źukowski2025-03-17T20:32:59ZWe respond briefly to the recent comment by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek Źukowski [arXiv:2210.09025 and Found. Phys. \textbf{54}, 45 (2024)] regarding our work defending RQM against their previous assessment. We refute the analysis proposed by the authors and rephrase our previous study in order to clarify the remaining ambiguities in our rebuttal.2025-03-17T20:32:59ZComments on arXiv:2210.09025 [doi.org/10.1007/s10701-024-00784-4]Aurélien Drezethttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13042v1The rise of stochasticity in physics2025-03-17T10:46:42ZIn the last 175 years, the physical understanding of
nature has seen a revolutionary change. Until about 1850, Newton's
theory and the mechanical world view derived from it provided the
dominant view of the physical world, later supplemented by Maxwell's
theory of the electromagnetic field. That approach was entirely
deterministic and free of probabilistic concepts. In contrast to
that conceptual edifice, today many fields of physics are governed
by probabilistic concepts. Statistical mechanics in its classical or
quantum version and random-matrix theory are obvious
examples. Quantum mechanics is an intrinsically statistical
theory. Classical chaos and its quantum manifestations also require
a stochastic approach. The paper describes how a combination of
discoveries and conceptual problems undermined the mechanical world
view, led to novel concepts, and shaped the modern understanding of
physics.2025-03-17T10:46:42ZEur. Phys. J. Plus 140:304 (2025)Hans A. Weidenmüllerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12959v1What makes you an observer?2025-03-17T09:15:13ZBoth empirical and theoretical objective science can only access relations, revealing nothing about the intrinsic nature of the entities "in relation". We typically refer to these entities as "matter", assuming their nature is irrelevant and that relational structures alone explain all phenomena, including consciousness. This would imply that consciousness arises not from matter itself but solely from its structural configurations. Consequently, if two worlds possess isomorphic structures and obey identical dynamical laws, isomorphic systems within these worlds should be equally sentient or insentient.
I demonstrate that if this premise held true, the memories within an observer's brain would bear no correlation to the external world. Yet since we do acquire knowledge of the external world, structure alone must be insufficient: there exists something beyond relations, the intrinsic essence of the "stuff in relation". This essence imbues the observer's structure with sentience, metaphorically "breathing fire" into it. In turn, the observer confers physical meaning upon the world's structures.
Remarkably, this conclusion emerges directly from physics and mathematics. Without acknowledging this intrinsic element, we would be incapable not only of subjective experience but also of acquiring any objective knowledge about the physical world.2025-03-17T09:15:13ZContribution to appear in the proceedings of the 11th International Workshop DICE2024, "Spacetime - Matter - Quantum Mechanics'', Castiglioncello (Tuscany), 16-20 September 2024Ovidiu Cristinel Stoicahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18313v2On the detectability of paraparticles beyond bosons and fermions2025-03-16T21:15:33ZIn this paper I present the state of the art concerning the theoretical detectability (and the open challenges for the experimental detectability) of a special class of paraparticles beyond bosons and fermions. The particles under considerations, obeying a parastatistics, are mutually exchanged via the permutation group and can exist in any space dimension (the anyons, which transform under the more general braid group, cannot exist in more than two space dimensions).2024-11-27T13:07:09Z18 pages; based on the plenary talk given at the 33rd/35th International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics (ICGTMP, Group33/35), Cotonou (Benin), July 15-19, 2024. Final version with added references to appear in the ProceedingsInt. J. of Geom. Methods in Modern Physics, 2540042 (2025), online versionFrancesco Toppan10.1142/S0219887825400420http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12488v1Translation of Valentine Bargmann, "Remarks on the general relativistic formulation of quantum theory" (1932)2025-03-16T12:45:02ZEnglish translation of "Bemerkungen zur allgemein-relativistischen Fassung der Quantentheorie", originally published in {\em Sitzber. kgl.-preuß. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Sitzung der phys.-math. Klasse} {\bf XXIV} (1932) 346--354.2025-03-16T12:45:02Z9 pagesA. E. S. Hartmannhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08033v2Navigating the Quantum Divide(s)2025-03-16T11:47:02ZThis article explores the potential divides from emerging quantum technologies (QT) on society, covering impacts on science, technology, geopolitics, and societal structures. We aim to challenge the concept of a single "quantum divide" by offering a comprehensive view. We propose four divides: in science, technologies, between countries, and within societies. The "Quantum Divide in Science" highlights gaps among scientists and access inequalities in research communities. The second divide, "Quantum Divide in Technologies through Path-dependency," looks at technology adoption processes. The "Quantum Divide between Countries" examines adoption reasons and outcomes across countries with varying development levels. Lastly, the "Quantum Divide within Societies" addresses societal implications, one of the most discussed in literature. We propose directions to navigate these divides, noting their interconnectedness and impact on innovation ecosystems. This study guides those interested in the quantum divide, navigation strategies, and QT's influence on scientific, technological, international, and societal institutions.2024-03-12T19:10:02Z21 pages, 4 figuresA. Ayda GercekZeki C. Seskir10.1109/EMR.2025.3547927http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20801v2Myths of Nuclear Graphite in World War II, with Original Translations2025-03-16T09:00:38ZWe re-examine a common narrative that experimental errors by Walther Bothe in 1941 led Germany to abandon graphite as a reactor moderator during World War II. Using document-based nuclear archaeology, we first show that both American and German scientists used an incorrect carbon scattering cross section, thereby undermining the accuracy of all wartime data, including their conclusions on carbon's absorption. Moreover, we argue that the availability of exceptionally pure petroleum coke in the United States, rather than any academic breakthrough, decisively enabled their production of nuclear-grade graphite. In contrast, Bothe's Siemens electrographite had more boron contamination than any graphites considered in Fermi's experiments, rendering it genuinely impractical as a moderator. By reframing the decision to eschew graphite as a deliberate decision rather than a mere experimental oversight, we believe the German decision was a rational consequence of a complex interplay between material constraints and wartime priorities.2024-05-31T14:03:36Z24 pages, 7 figuresPatrick J. ParkSebastian HerzeleTimothy W. Koethhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14689v1Key Historical Experiments in Hadron Physics2025-03-15T13:11:47ZThe experimental observations that led to the quark structure of matter and the development of hadron physics are reviewed with emphasis on the discoveries of mesons and baryons, starting in the 1940s with the pion and kaon which mediate the strong hadronic force. The evidence for an internal structure of the hadrons consisting of two or three elementary spin 1/2 particles is reviewed. The discoveries of hadrons made of the heavier charm and bottom quarks are described. In 2003 more complex multi-quark hadrons began to emerge. The subsequent developments beyond the early 2000s are covered in the Review of Particle Physics (Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001). Given the very large number of observed hadrons, the choice of key experiments is somewhat subjective.2025-03-15T13:11:47Z21 pages, 35 figures, submitted to the Encyclopedia of Particle Physics (1st edition)Claude Amsler