https://arxiv.org/api/hR6gG9Bpp5LDAftzJiZdEPjPA6A 2026-06-14T18:49:24Z 5610 510 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05703v1 2025-04-08T05:56:17Z

We consider the class of physical theories whose dynamics are given by natural equations, which are partial differential equations determined by a functor from the category of n-manifolds, for some n, to the category of fiber bundles, satisfying certain further conditions. We show how the theory of natural equations clarifies several important foundational issues, including the status and meaning of minimal coupling, symmetries of theories, and background structure. We also state and prove a fundamental result about the initial value problem for natural equations.

2025-04-08T05:56:17Z 26 pages James Owen Weatherall Eleanor March http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05701v1 2025-04-08T05:46:01Z

I consider the sense in which teleparallel gravity and symmetric teleparallel gravity may be understood as gauge theories of gravity. I first argue that both theories have surplus structure. I then consider the relationship between Yang-Mills theory and Poincare Gauge Theory and argue that though these use similar formalisms, there are subtle disanalogies in their interpretation.

2025-04-08T05:46:01Z 17 pages. Presented as part of the Symposium "The Philosophy of the Geometric Trinity of Gravity" at PSA 2025 James Owen Weatherall http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05699v1 2025-04-08T05:42:20Z

I revisit Roberto Torretti's "Spacetime Models for the World" [SHPMP 31 (2):171-186 (2000)] in the light of more recent work in (philosophy of) cosmology. I discuss the motivations for FLRW spacetimes as a natural starting point for inquiry, and I suggest contemporary cosmologists can avoid the rationalism that Torretti attributes to Einstein's early work in relativistic cosmology. I then discuss the senses in which FLRW models are idealized, and I show how those idealizations (and partial de-idealizations) have contributed to our understanding of the universe.

2025-04-08T05:42:20Z 21 pages. Presented as part of a symposium in honor of Roberto Torretti at CLMPST 2023 in Buenos Aires James Owen Weatherall http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06297v1 2025-04-07T08:44:17Z

Deng, Hani, and Ma [arXiv:2503.01800] claim to resolve Hilbert's Sixth Problem by deriving the Navier-Stokes-Fourier equations from Newtonian mechanics via an iterated limit: a Boltzmann-Grad limit (\(\varepsilon \to 0\), \(N \varepsilon^{d-1} = α\) fixed) yielding the Boltzmann equation, followed by a hydrodynamic limit (\(α\to \infty\)) to obtain fluid dynamics. Though mathematically rigorous, their approach harbors two critical physical flaws. First, the vanishing volume fraction (\(N \varepsilon^d \to 0\)) confines the system to a dilute gas, incapable of embodying dense fluid properties even as \(α\) scales, rendering the resulting equations a rescaled gas model rather than a true continuum. Second, the Boltzmann equation's reliance on molecular chaos collapses in fluid-like regimes, where recollisions and correlations invalidate its derivation from Newtonian dynamics. These inconsistencies expose a disconnect between the formalism and the physical essence of fluids, failing to capture emergent, density-driven phenomena central to Hilbert's vision. We contend that the Sixth Problem remains open, urging a rethink of classical kinetic theory's limits and the exploration of alternative frameworks to unify microscale mechanics with macroscale fluid behavior.

2025-04-07T08:44:17Z 10 pages, no figures, comment on arXiv:2503.01800 Shan Gao http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04617v1 2025-04-06T20:59:40Z

After a short Historical bibliographical note, in the Starting points attention will be focused on some postulates common to classical mechanics and special relativity. Starting from these premises, in the sections The deduction of the form of possible transformations and The Ignatowsky constant it will be shown that the choice between the Galilean scheme and one of the generalized Lorentz type is in fact the only possible one. In a generalized Lorentz scheme, the interactions propagate at a finite velocity VL and the form of the transformations of the space-time coordinates of the events is analogous to those of Lorentz; the only difference is that the limiting speed VL plays the role assumed by the invariance of c, the speed of light in a vacuum, in Lorentz transformations. The line of development of the arguments does not depend directly on electromagnetism, in other words we are dealing with a regulating principle for kinematics and for the set of laws of physics. The assumption VL=c can be assumed from the experimental datum of the invariance of c, i.e. from the validity of Maxwell's equations. Galileo transformations are obtained if and only if the time interval between two events is an invariant for inertial frames of reference, if this interval is not invariant then the transformations are of the generalized Lorentz type. In this framework, the experimental confirmations of the non-invariance of time intervals constitute an indirect confirmation of the generalized Lorentz transformations and therefore of the existence of a limiting velocity for the interactions. During the course of the discussion, a demonstration of the "Reciprocity Lemma" will also be presented, different and simpler than other approaches proposed in the literature [6,7,8].

2025-04-06T20:59:40Z 25 pages, 2 figures Fabiano Minni http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.16676v5 2025-04-05T00:42:20Z

We discuss an unfortunate mistake, for a Dirac free particle, in the last Fermi lecture notes on quantum mechanics, in a course given at the University of Chicago in winter and spring of 1954. As is demonstrated, the correct result can be obtained by a simple matrix multiplication. An attempt to collect a relevant bibliography is made.

2023-07-09T17:12:09Z 14 pages, 4 figures, 51 references Sergei K. Suslov http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.7381v2 2025-04-04T17:18:19Z

It is argued that the problem of interpreting quantum mechanics, and the philosophical problem of consciousness, both have their roots in the same set of misguided Cartesian assumptions. The confusions underlying those assumptions are analyzed in detail. It is sometimes suggested that quantum mechanics might explain consciousness. That is not the suggestion here. Rather it is suggested that an adequate non-Cartesian philosophy would transform our understanding of both quantum mechanics and consciousness. Consequently, it would change our ideas as to just what it is that we are trying to explain.

2013-05-31T12:56:32Z 27 pages; invited talk at workshop on Pauli and Jung, Filzbach, September 2012. Replaced with published version Harald Atmanspacher and Christopher A. Fuchs (eds.) "The Pauli-Jung Conjecture and Its Impact Today'', Imprint Academic, 2014 D. M. Appleby http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01118v1 2025-04-01T18:42:57Z

Steven Weinberg productive scientific life teaches us many things, one of the most important of which is the power of his example. This essay contains personal reminiscences and a speculation about gravitational wave propagation based on one of his very last papers -- as seems fitting, given his penchant for putting interesting physics into the essays he wrote for other luminaries over the years. (See arXiv:2502.10979 [physics.hist-ph] for a less personal summary of his main scientific accomplishments.)

2025-04-01T18:42:57Z 4 pages. To appear in the NPB collection remembering Weinberg C. P. Burgess http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21553v1 2025-04-01T18:00:36Z

The issue of whether we make decisions freely has vexed philosophers for millennia, Resolving this is vital for solving a diverse range of problems, from the physiology of how the brain makes decisions (and how we assign moral responsibility to those decisions) to the interpretation of experiments on entangled quantum particles. A deterministic model of free will is developed, based on two concepts. The first generalises the notion of initialisation of nonlinear systems where information cascades upscale from the Planck scale, exemplified by the chaology of colliding billiard balls, and featured in the author's Rational Quantum Mechanics. With `just-in-time' initialisation, such Planck-scale information is only initialised when it is needed to describe super-Planck scale evolution, and not e.g., at the time of the Big Bang. In this way determinism does not imply predestination and a system with finitely many degrees of freedom can shadow a system with infinitely many, over arbitrarily long timescales. The second concept describes the upscale control of such Planck-scale information on super-Planck scales and is illustrated by reference to stochastic rounding in numerical analysis. Using these concepts, a deterministic model is proposed whereby freely-made decisions are made by using past experiences to control the impact of noise in the low-energy brain. It is claimed that such a model has evolutionary advantages, not least preventing paralysis by analysis and encouraging rational risk taking. It is concluded that humans have free will, determinism notwithstanding. The model is applied to study the foundational issue of free choice in quantum physics experiments: it is shown that violating the Measurement Independence assumption does not invalidate the free-will conclusion above.

2025-04-01T18:00:36Z Companion to the author's Rational Quantum Mechanics Tim Palmer http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22682v2 2025-04-01T08:21:53Z

In a recent work, arxiv:2412.20407, we have mentioned two Egyptian kings, Shepseskaf and Userkaf, of the IV and V Dynasties. Here we continue discussing their burial places, that is their pyramids, in a new framework based on the study of orientation of pyramid substructures (entrances, corridors, burial chambers). Shepseskaf and Userkaf opted for the same architectonic solutions, exhibiting a continuity in funerary architecture. After showing the substructure orientations of the pyramids of the IV and V Dynasties, we will stress that the substructure in the Shepseskaf's pyramid, the Mastabat Fara'un, is oriented as in the Fourth Dynasty architecture of pyramids and that it has a layout which is closer to that used by the following Fifth Dynasty. In our discussion, we will start with the first ruler of the Fourth Dynasty, Snefru, who introduced a new form of external and internal layout of the burial complexes of the king, through an evolution based on four attempts, the Seila, Meidum, Bent and Red pyramids. In the final model, the Snefru's Red pyramid, the substructure has a north entrance and a burial chamber east-west oriented. This orientation persisted in the pyramids of the Fourth and Fifth Dynasties, and beyond. The Sekhemkhet (Djoserty) pyramid of the Third Dynasty is also illustrated for comparison, such as some earlier burial monuments. In the discussion here proposed the position of sarcophagus and of the body inside it is also investigated. The sarcophagus has its axis north-south. The body of the deceased king was lying on its left side, extended, head to the north, face towards the east. In this framework, we propose again what we told in arXiv 2016, arxiv:1604.05963, and the layout of pyramids with respect to sunrise on solstices.

2025-02-12T14:12:15Z I have added some references and discussions about the name of Shepseskaf pyramid. I have also revised the links, all to be active Amelia Carolina Sparavigna http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10601v3 2025-03-31T16:47:40Z

What is fundamentally quantum? We argue that most of the features, problems, and paradoxes -- such as the measurement problem, the Wigner's friend paradox and its proposed solutions, single particle nonlocality, and no-cloning -- allegedly attributed to quantum physics have a classical analogue if one is to interpret classical physics as fundamentally indeterministic. What really characterizes non-classical effects are incompatible physical quantities, which, in quantum quantum theory are associated to the fundamental constant $\hbar$.

2024-09-16T18:00:01Z 12 pages, 4 figures Quantum 9, 1686 (2025) Flavio Del Santo Nicolas Gisin 10.22331/q-2025-04-03-1686 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11462v1 2025-03-31T13:57:49Z

Some of the most challenging problems in Timaeus' cosmology arise from the geometry of a universe without any void. On the one hand, the universe is spherical in shape; on the other hand, it must be entirely filled with the four basic particles that make up all bodies in the universe, each shaped like one of four regular polyhedra (cubes, tetrahedra, octahedra and icosahedra). The faces of all these particles are composed of right triangles. However, this leads to two mathematical impossibilities. 1. Obtaining a spherical surface from linear surfaces, as it is impossible to create a circle from straight lines. 2. Obtaining a complete tiling of a sphere using regular polyhedra, without any voids or intersections between these polyhedra. The first problem is addressed in another article slated for publication. In the present one, our focus will be on the second problem, for which we will present a solution within the framework of Timaeus' cosmology. The crux of this solution lies in a feature of Timaeus' universe that sets it apart from almost all ancient cosmologies. Instead of being composed of rigid parts, it is a dynamic living body in which all basic components are in constant motion, continuously undergoing both destruction and reconstruction. In the first part, we examine the main features of Timaeus' cosmology relevant to our issue. In the second part, we analyze the paradox in details and its consequences for Timaeus' cosmology. We then discuss the common 'solutions' and highlight their shortcomings. Finally, we propose a solution that we believe is consistent with Plato's text and independent of the choice of the major schools of interpretation of the Timaeus.

2025-03-31T13:57:49Z Ancient Philosophy, In press Luc Brisson IMJ-PRG Salomon Ofman IMJ-PRG http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23614v1 2025-03-30T22:40:17Z

For generations, people have complained that things used to be better in the past. In this paper, we investigate this change by specifically looking at creativity in astronomy. To do this,we explore if older constellations reflected a greater sense of creativity on the part of those designing them than more modern constellations do. We find that things really have become simplistic and less original over time.

2025-03-30T22:40:17Z 9 pages, 2 figures and 1 table, submitted to Acta Prima Aprilia Michael B. Lund http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15776v2 2025-03-26T15:14:59Z

The purpose of this survey is to take a snapshot of the attitudes of physicists working on some of the most pressing questions in modern physics, which may be useful to sociologists and historians of science. For this study, a total of 85 completed surveys were returned out of 151 registered participants of the ``Black holes Inside and out'' conference, held in Copenhagen in 2024. The survey asked questions about some of the most contentious issues in fundamental physics, including the nature of black holes and dark energy. A number of surprising results were found. For example, some of the leading frameworks, such as the cosmological constant, cosmic inflation, or string theory - while most popular - gain less than the majority of votes from the participants. The only statement that gains majority approval (by 68\% of participants) was that the Big Bang meant ``the universe evolved from a hot dense state'', not ``an absolute beginning time''. These results provide reasons for caution in describing ideas as consensus in the scientific community when a more nuanced view may be justified.

2025-03-20T01:26:08Z 18 pages, 12 figures Alice Y. Chen Phil Halper Niayesh Afshordi http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20067v1 2025-03-25T21:01:46Z

It is commonly remarked that contemporary physics faces a challenge in reconciling quantum theory with Relativity, specifically General Relativity as a theory of gravity. But "challenge" is too mild a descriptor. Once one understands both what John Bell proved and what Einstein himself demanded of Relativity it becomes clear that the predictions of quantum theory, predictions that have been verified in the lab, are flatly incompatible with what Einstein wanted and built into General Relativity. There is not merely a tension but an incompatibility between the predictions of quantum theory and Relativity, and what has to give way is the Relativistic account of space-time structure and dynamics.

2025-03-25T21:01:46Z 28 pages, 4 figures Tim Maudlin