https://arxiv.org/api/WXm74pEWG/ihdHmQBtG4kXfL0bk 2026-06-14T17:50:11Z 5610 495 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06244v1 The fallacies of LCDM falsifications 2025-04-27T20:23:22Z In recent years, numerous arguments have emerged suggesting that the LCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model may be inconsistent with observational data, requiring more or less radical revisions. Notable examples include the Hubble tension, the discrepancy between early and late-universe measurements of the Hubble constant, as well as tensions in measurements of cosmic structure growth. These issues have led some to question the validity of the LCDM framework and consider possible modifications or alternative models. However, upon closer inspection, many of these critiques stem from methodological or interpretive disagreements rather than from clear falsifications in the strict Popperian sense. Karl Popper proposed that scientific theories must be testable and falsifiable; in other words, a theory should be rejected if it fails a specific, reproducible test. Yet, many of the alleged inconsistencies within LCDM, while statistically significant, are not definitive falsifications but rather indicators of areas needing refinement or more complex modeling within the same framework. Thus, I review the recent claims about LCDM's limitations and analyze why they often reflect individual biases or philosophical preferences, rather than rigorous scientific falsifications. For example, alternative cosmological models such as MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) or models incorporating new physics like quintessence or modified gravity are sometimes advocated based on theoretical appeal rather than direct evidence from critical tests. In many cases, these arguments for falsifying LCDM reveal more about subjective interpretations of data than about concrete observational contradictions. 2025-04-27T20:23:22Z 11 pages, no figure, to be publshed in the book "Cosmology Research - Addressing Current Problems with Astrophysics." IntechOpen Alain Blanchard http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18789v1 The Radiation Pressure of Light: historical perspectives and the role of structured light 2025-04-26T04:04:40Z Light, or electromagnetic radiation, is well known to possess momentum, and the exchange of this momentum with a reflecting surface leads to radiation pressure. More often than not, it is the radiation pressure generated by a plane wave incident on a flat mirror that is considered. The last few decades have seen the emergence of structured light beams that may possess a complex phase and amplitude structure in both their transverse and longitudinal directions. This paper provides a historical overview of radiation pressure, tracing its discovery and experimental validation, and examines how transitioning to structured light from a plane wave can influence it. In particular, we elucidate the difference in radiation pressure force for structured light fields and how this differs from that of a plane wave at an identical frequency. In particular, the well-known Gouy phase is shown to contribute to a reduction in the radiation pressure force exerted on a flat mirror in comparison to a plane wave for both HG and LG modes. As an illustrative example, we compute that the radiation pressure force for LG modes differs from that of a plane wave by approximately $20$ fN/W for each unit of orbital angular momentum. A detailed experimental proposal to quantify this variance in radiation pressure is described, and we demonstrate that this measurement is within the realm of current metrological techniques. 2025-04-26T04:04:40Z 11 pages, 3 figures Alexander C. Trowbridge Ewan M. Wright Kishan Dholakia http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18347v1 Tachyons Before Tachyons: Lev Strum (1890-1936) and Superluminal Velocities 2025-04-25T13:36:41Z No particle or signal carrying information can travel at a speed exceeding that of light in vacuum. Although this has for a long time been accepted as a law of nature, prior to Einstein's 1905 theory of special relativity the possibility of superluminal motion of electrons was widely discussed by Arnold Sommerfeld and other physicists. Besides, it is not obvious that special relativity rules out such motion under all circumstances. From approximately 1965 to 1985 the hypothesis of tachyons moving faster than light was seriously entertained by a minority of physicists. This paper reviews the early history concerning superluminal signals and pays particular attention to the ideas proposed in the 1920s by the little known Ukrainian physicist Lev Strum (Shtrum). As he pointed out in a paper of 1923, within the framework of relativity it is possible for a signal to move superluminally without violating the law of causality. Part of this article is devoted to the personal and scientific biography of the undeservedly neglected Strum, whose career was heavily and eventually fatally influenced by the political situation in Stalin's Russia. Remarkably, to the limited extent that Strum is known today, it is as a literary figure in a novel and not as a real person. 2025-04-25T13:36:41Z 25 pages Helge Kragh http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06458v2 Chien-Shiung Wu as the experimental pioneer in quantum entanglement: a 2022 note 2025-04-25T09:10:59Z Advised by Prof. Chen Ning Yang, we review the early pioneering work by Chien-Shiung Wu on entangled photons created from the electron-positron annihilation. This paper formed a basis of the author's speech at International Symposium Commemorating the 110th Birth Anniversary of Chien-Shiung Wu, May 31, 2022, and of a few articles on the subject in Chinese. 2025-02-10T13:36:18Z 6 pages, published version, a few websites are included Modern Physics Letters A 40, Nos. 9 & 10 (2025) 2530001 Yu Shi 10.1142/S0217732325300010 http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04632v1 Is spacetime curved? Assessing the underdetermination of general relativity and teleparallel gravity 2025-04-24T16:23:44Z Realism about general relativity (GR) seems to imply realism about spacetime curvature. The existence of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) calls this into question, for (a) TEGR is set in a torsionful but flat spacetime, and (b) TEGR is empirically equivalent to GR. Knox (2011) claims that there is no genuine underdetermination between GR and TEGR; we call this verdict into question by isolating and addressing her individual arguments. In addition, we anticipate and evaluate two further worries for realism about the torsionful spacetimes of TEGR, which we call the "problem of operationalisability" and the "problem of visualisability". 2025-04-24T16:23:44Z Synthese 204, 126 (2024) Ruward Mulder James Read 10.1007/s11229-024-04773-y http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10267v2 Identification is Pointless: Quantum Coordinates, Localisation of Events, and the Quantum Hole Argument 2025-04-24T15:42:22Z The study of quantum reference frames (QRFs) is motivated by the idea of taking into account the quantum properties of the reference frames used, explicitly or implicitly, in our description of physical systems. Like classical reference frames, QRFs can be used to define physical quantities relationally. Unlike their classical analogue, they relativise the notions of superposition and entanglement. Here, we explain this feature by examining how configurations or locations are identified across different branches in superposition. We show that, in the presence of symmetries, whether a system is in "the same" or "different" configurations across the branches depends on the choice of QRF. Hence, sameness and difference -- and thus superposition and entanglement -- lose their absolute meaning. We apply these ideas to the context of semi-classical spacetimes in superposition and use coincidences of four scalar fields to construct a comparison map between spacetime points in the different branches. This reveals that the localisation of an event is frame-dependent. We discuss the implications for indefinite causal order and the locality of interaction and conclude with a generalisation of Einstein's hole argument to the quantum context. 2024-02-15T19:00:01Z 25 pages, 12 figures. Comments are welcome. Accepted in Communications Physics Commun Phys 8, 185 (2025) Viktoria Kabel Anne-Catherine de la Hamette Luca Apadula Carlo Cepollaro Henrique Gomes Jeremy Butterfield Časlav Brukner 10.1038/s42005-025-02084-3 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16978v1 Scientific Spirit of Chien-Shiung Wu: From Quantum Entanglement to Parity Nonconservation 2025-04-23T17:36:42Z In 1950, Chien-Shiung Wu and her student published a coincidence experiment on entangled photon pairs that were created in electron-positron annihilation. This experiment precisely verified the prediction of quantum electrodynamics. Additionally, it was also the first instance of a precisely controlled quantum entangled state of spatially separated particles, although Wu did not know about this at the time. In 1956, Wu initiated and led the so-called Wu experiment, which discovered parity nonconservation, becoming one of the greatest experiments of the 20th century. As Chen Ning Yang said, Wu's experiments were well known for their precision and accuracy. Experimental precision and accuracy manifested Wu's scientific spirit, which we investigate here in some detail. This paper is the translated transcript of the speech the author made at the International Symposium Commemorating the 110th Anniversary of the Birth of Chien-Shiung Wu, on May 31, 2022. The above abstract is the translation of the original abstract of the speech. 2025-04-23T17:36:42Z 18 pages, translated transcript of the speech the author made at the International Symposium Commemorating the 110th Anniversary of the Birth of Chien-Shiung Wu, on May 31, 2022 Yu Shi http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07826v1 Revisiting the Einstein-de Haas experiment: the Amp{è}re Museum's hidden treasure 2025-04-23T10:40:34Z Unearthed in the Amp{è}re Museum near Lyon, France, a genuine version of the Einstein-de Haas experiment apparatus offers a rare glimpse into Einstein's experimental interests. This remarkable find not only connects us to a crucial epoch in history of science but also highlights Einstein's rare tangible legacy in the realm of experimental physics. 2025-04-23T10:40:34Z Europhysics News, 2024, 55 (4), pp.28-31 Alfonso San Miguel ILM Bernard Pallandre 10.1051/epn/2024409 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17438v2 The Legacy of Henrietta Leavitt: A Re-analysis of the First Cepheid Period-Luminosity Relation 2025-04-21T21:49:38Z Henrietta Swan Leavitt's discovery of the relationship between the period and luminosity (hereafter the Leavitt Law) of 25 variable stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud, published in 1912, revolutionized cosmology. These variables, eventually identified as Cepheids, became the first known "standard candles" for measuring extragalactic distances and remain the gold standard for this task today. Leavitt measured light curves, periods, and minimum and maximum magnitudes from painstaking visual inspection of photographic plates. Her work paved the way for the first precise series of distance measurements that helped set the scale of the Universe, and later the discovery of its expansion by Edwin Hubble in 1929. Here, we re-analyze Leavitt's first Period-Luminosity relation using observations of the same set of stars but with modern data and methods of Cepheid analysis. Using only data from Leavitt's notebooks, we assess the quality of her light curves, measured periods, and the slope and scatter of her Period-Luminosity relations. We show that modern data and methods, for the same objects, reduce the scatter of the Period-Luminosity relation by a factor of two. We also find a bias brightward at the short period end, due to the non-linearity of the plates and environmental crowding. Overall, Leavitt's results are in excellent agreement with contemporary measurements, reinforcing the value of Cepheids in cosmology today, a testament to the enduring quality of her work. 2025-02-24T18:59:56Z 12 pages, 8 figures. Accepted to PASP Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Volume 137, Number 4 (2025) Louise Breuval Caroline D. Huang Adam G. Riess 10.1088/1538-3873/adc5a1 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12962v1 Astronomical Refutation of the New Chronology by Fomenko and Nosovsky: The 1151-Year Planetary Cycle and Dating of the Almagest via Speed/Error Correlation 2025-04-17T14:11:00Z This paper introduces two astronomical methods developed through computational simulation to evaluate the historical dating of ancient astronomical sources. The first identifies a 1151-year planetary cycle based on the recurrence of visible configurations of Mercury to Saturn, including the Sun and Moon, from a geocentric perspective. The second, called SESCC (Speed-Error Signals Cross Correlation), statistically estimates the epoch of star catalogs by analyzing the correlation between positional error and proper motion in ecliptic latitude. Both methods are reproducible, data-driven, and yield results that contradict key tenets of the New Chronology proposed by Fomenko and Nosovsky, most notably the claim that the Anno Domini began in 1152 CE. Open-source code and analysis tools are provided for independent verification. 2025-04-17T14:11:00Z 7 pages, 2 figures. Includes links to code repositories and datasets Carlos Baiget Orts http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09622v1 Towards an Account of Complementarities and Context-Dependence 2025-04-16T05:20:37Z Modern physics proposals present deep tensions between seemingly contradictory descriptions of reality. Views of wave-particle duality, black hole complementarity, and the Unruh effect demand explanations that shift depending on how a system is observed. However, traditional models of scientific explanation impose a fixed structure that fails to account for varying observational contexts. This paper introduces context-dependent mapping, a framework that reorganizes physical laws into self-consistent subsets structured around what can actually be observed in a given context. By doing so, it provides a principled way to integrate complementarity into the philosophy of explanation. 2025-04-16T05:20:37Z 16 pages, 5 figures, Published in Stance Philosophy Journal Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal, 18(1), 44-59 (2025) Hong Joo Ryoo 10.33043/YMCGR3hB http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11311v1 From Symmetry to Supersymmetry to Supergravity 2025-04-15T15:51:54Z The theoretical developments that led to supersymmetry, first global and then local, over roughly six years (1970-1976) arose from a convergence of physical insights and mathematical methods stemming from diverse, and sometimes independent, research directions. This contribution aims to illustrate the interplay of ideas, methods, and motivations that informed the entire process and concludes with a reflection on the scientific modality of these developments. 2025-04-15T15:51:54Z Invited contribution to the volume "Half a Century of Supergravity", A. Ceresole and G. Dall'Agata (eds.) Elena Castellani http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11022v2 Compatibilidad del Argumento Cosmológico Kalam con la Ciencia Contemporánea 2025-04-14T17:18:56Z The Kalam cosmological argument, of a metaphysical nature, asserts that the universe had a first cause. This study examines the compatibility of its premises through a bibliographic review of advancements in contemporary physics. Quantum theory demonstrates that quantum phenomena are indeterministic and non-causal. Even in deterministic theories, causality lacks a clear definition. Moreover, cosmological models, such as cosmic inflation, suggest that the early stages of the universe do not require a first cause. In conclusion, the premises of the Kalam argument are not compatible with contemporary physics. 2023-02-21T21:39:47Z in Spanish Carlos Desa http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08461v1 Astrophysical constraints on the simulation hypothesis for this Universe: why it is (nearly) impossible that we live in a simulation 2025-04-11T11:47:45Z We assess how physically realistic the ''simulation hypothesis'' for this Universe is, based on physical constraints arising from the link between information and energy, and on known astrophysical constraints. We investigate three cases: the simulation of the entire visible Universe, the simulation of Earth only, or a low resolution simulation of Earth, compatible with high-energy neutrino observations. In all cases, the amounts of energy or power required by any version of the simulation hypothesis are entirely incompatible with physics, or (literally) astronomically large, even in the lowest resolution case. Only universes with very different physical properties can produce some version of this Universe as a simulation. On the other hand, our results show that it is just impossible that this Universe is simulated by a universe sharing the same properties, regardless of technological advancements of the far future. 2025-04-11T11:47:45Z 17 pages, 4 figures. Frontiers in Physics, in press F. Vazza 10.3389/fphy.2025.1561873 http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19965v2 Fundamentals of Stars II: Revisiting Bolometric Corrections 2025-04-08T06:16:52Z The development line of bolometric corrections within the brief history of photometry was described from the perspective of the Kuhnian philosophy of science. The luminous efficiency and heat index were two previous concepts to imply visual and bolometric brightness difference of a star, which was mainly suggested and used as auxiliary tools for calibrating stellar temperature scales before the term ``bolometric correction'' (BC) was also introduced for the same purpose by Kuiper in 1938, as $BC = M_{\rm bol} - M_{\rm V} = m_{\rm {bol}} - V$. Despite its ill-posed nature imposing no zero-point constant ($C_2=0$) for the BC scale and $L_{\rm V} = L \times 10^{BC/2.5}$, if $BC>0$, $L_{\rm V}$ is unphysical, for the luminosity of a star from which ``BC of a star must always be negative,'' ``the bolometric magnitude of a star ought to be brighter than its $V$-magnitude,'' and ``the zero point of bolometric corrections are arbitrary'' (paradigms) were extracted. The newest of the first three definitions of BC was accepted and used throughout the century. Therefore, the part of the development line of BC before Kuiper could be considered a prescience period. The rest could be named the normal science period in which astrophysicists work under the three paradigms. The rise of BC as a concept, how the ill-posed definition BC emerged/used, how inconsistencies (paradigms) of BC developed, and how the Resolution B2 of the General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union imposing $C_{\rm bol} = 71.197\,425\,\ldots$ mag, and $C_2>0$, for the zero-point constants of the $M_{\rm {Bol}}$ and BC scales resolve the long-lasting problems were discussed. Generalized new definition of BC implying $L_{\rm V}=L \times 10^\frac{({\rm BC}-C_2)}{2.5}$ were given to replace $L_{\rm V} = L \times 10^{BC/2.5}$. 2025-03-25T18:00:02Z 31 pages, 4 figures and 5 tables, accepted for publication in Physics and Astronomy Reports Z. Eker V. Bakis