https://arxiv.org/api/dUWdwV6t8lsUdcHy3c0npJGd+So2026-06-14T16:59:13Z561048015http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08307v1Against Radical Relationalism: in Defense of the Ordinal Structure of Time2025-05-13T07:33:37ZSome authors in the quantum gravity community endorse, explicitly or implicitly, a radical relationalist view of time which states that the ordinal structure of time is not needed even in our classical theories, especially in general relativity. In this article I analyze this position and the arguments supporting it, and I argue that there are some serious concerns with some of the radical relationalists' arguments which make it an unattractive position. In this sense, I conclude that the chrono-ordinal structures of our theories play important theoretical and explanatory roles and that they can be taken to be part of the empirical content of our theories.2025-05-13T07:33:37ZFound Phys 55, 37 (2025)Álvaro Mozota Frauca10.1007/s10701-025-00850-5http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07751v1Naturalistic Metaphysics and the Parity Thesis: Why Scientific Realism Doesn't Lead to Realism about Metaphysics2025-05-12T16:58:08ZIn recent work, Nina Emery has defended the view that, in the context of naturalistic metaphysics, one should maintain the same epistemic attitude towards science and metaphysics. That is, naturalists who are scientific realists ought to be realists about metaphysics as well; and naturalists who are antirealists about science should also be antirealists about metaphysics. We call this the `parity thesis'. This paper suggests that the parity thesis is widely, albeit often implicitly, accepted among naturalistically inclined philosophers, and essentially for reasons similar to Emery's. Then, reasons are provided for resisting Emery's specific inference from scientific realism to realism about metaphysics. The resulting picture is a more nuanced view of the relationship between science and metaphysics within the naturalistic setting than the one which is currently most popular.2025-05-12T16:58:08ZAccepted manuscript, forthcoming in SyntheseRaoni ArroyoMatteo Morgantihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18161v1On the orientation of historic Christian churches of Fuerteventura: conciliating tradition, winds and topography2025-05-11T15:49:04ZWe present the results of an analysis of the precise spatial orientation of colonial Christian churches located in the Canary Island of Fuerteventura (Spain). Our sample consists of 48 churches, most built during the period between the Castilian conquest led by the Norman Jean de Béthencourt in the 15th century and the end of the 19th century. We examine whether the standard tradition was followed regarding the orientation of the apses of historic churches eastwards. While most of the religious constructions in the sample have their main axes oriented within the solar range, the statistical analysis also reveals the presence of two different groups of churches with different possible interpretations. For the first group, mainly composed of churches located in the central part of the island, an anomalous tendency to orientate them towards a declination of c. -14 degrees is detected. We provide some possible explanations for this, which include the date of a traditional Canarian celebration, an eventual imprint of topography, and the possibility of sunset orientations. Also, this particular value of declination is close to -16.3 degrees, the declination of Sirius during the 17th century. Therefore, we provide ethnographic data that might support an eventually controversial 'bright star' orientation. For the second group, meanwhile, we find a pattern of orientation where the apse of the churches points slightly to the north of due east. We propose this might signal constructions that were oriented to the rising Sun on dates close to Easter, one of the most important festivities of Christianity.2025-05-11T15:49:04ZPDF document including 2 tables and 9 figuresJournal of Skyscape Archaeology 9.1: 5-31, 2023Maria Florencia MuratoreAlejandro GanguiMaitane Urrutia-AparicioCarmelo CabreraJuan Antonio Belmonte10.1558/jsa.22808http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09646v1Temporal Interception and Present Reconstruction: A Cognitive-Signal Model for Human and AI Decision Making2025-05-11T15:38:27ZThis paper proposes a novel theoretical model to explain how the human mind and artificial intelligence can approach real-time awareness by reducing perceptual delays. By investigating cosmic signal delay, neurological reaction times, and the ancient cognitive state of stillness, we explore how one may shift from reactive perception to a conscious interface with the near future. This paper introduces both a physical and cognitive model for perceiving the present not as a linear timestamp, but as an interference zone where early-arriving cosmic signals and reactive human delays intersect. We propose experimental approaches to test these ideas using human neural observation and neuro-receptive extensions. Finally, we propose a mathematical framework to guide the evolution of AI systems toward temporally efficient, ethically sound, and internally conscious decision-making processes2025-05-11T15:38:27Z8 pages, 3 figuresCarmel Mary Esther Ahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05142v2Rationally warranted promise: the virtue-economic account of pursuit-worthiness2025-05-11T12:38:47ZPursuing a scientific idea is often justified by the promise associated with it. Philosophers of science have proposed a variety of approaches to such promise, including more specific indicators. Economic models in particular emphasise the trade-off between an idea's benefits and its costs. Taking up this Peirce-inspired idea, we spell out the metaphor of such a cost-benefit analysis of scientific ideas. We show that it fruitfully urges a set of salient meta-methodological questions that accounts of scientific pursuit-worthiness ought to address. In line with such a meta-methodological framework, we articulate and explore an appealing and auspicious concretisation -- what we shall dub "the virtue-economic account of pursuit-worthiness": cognitive benefits and costs of an idea, we suggest, should be characterised in terms of an idea's theoretical virtues, such as empirical adequacy, explanatory power, or coherence. Assessments of pursuit-worthiness are deliberative judgements in which scientifically competent evaluators weigh and compare the prospects of such virtues, subject to certain rationality constraints that ensure historical and contemporary scientific circumspection, coherence and systematicity. The virtue-economic account, we show, sheds new light on the normativity of scientific pursuit, methodological pluralism in science, and the rationality of historical science.2025-01-09T10:47:13ZPatrick M. DuerrEnno Fischerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06421v1Às vezes, solucionar uma crise depende de ampliá-la: a contribuição de Louis de Broglie à Física Quântica2025-05-09T20:40:46ZFaz-se uma breve reconstrução histórica de alguns pontos que, de algum modo, contribuíram para o trabalho seminal de Louis de Broglie. Em particular, enfatiza-se a relevância de sua tese de doutorado, principalmente por seu valor epistemológico, ao ampliar a crise que havia sido introduzida na descrição da radiação pelo \textit{quantum} de Planck, abrindo caminho para sua solução.
A brief historical reconstruction of some points that, in some way, contributed to Louis de Broglie's seminal work is made. In particular, the relevance of his doctoral thesis is emphasized, mainly for its epistemological value, in expanding the crisis that had been introduced in the description of radiation by Planck's quantum, paving the way for its solution.2025-05-09T20:40:46Z16 p., in Portuguese language, 3 figuresFrancisco CarusoVitor Ogurihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11519v1The Journey from Planck Distribution to Bose Statistics From Classical to Quantum Mechanics and Beyond2025-05-08T10:14:15ZIn 1924, Satyendra Nath Bose's pioneering work laid the foundation for Bose-Einstein statistics, which describes particles with integral spins. His derivation of Planck's law for blackbody radiation bypassed classical assumptions, relying instead on the statistical mechanics of light quanta. Bose's methodology addressed limitations in existing theories, such as Einstein's dependence on classical concepts like Wien's displacement law and Bohr's correspondence principle. Further, his work underscored the incompatibility between classical electrodynamics and quantum theory, proposing innovative statistical approaches to thermodynamic equilibrium. The insights from Bose's work extend beyond theoretical physics. As was immediately noticed by Einstein, for temperatures below a critical threshold, Bose-Einstein statistics predicts the formation of a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), where particles condense en-masse into the ground state. This quantum phenomenon on a macroscopic scale opened avenues to explore new technologies in recent times, apart from throwing light on new phases of matter. This article revisits Bose's groundbreaking contributions, highlighting their enduring impact on quantum mechanics, statistical physics, and field theory.2025-05-08T10:14:15ZShreetam DashPrasanta K. Panigrahihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00541v2In Search of Cosmic Time: Complete Observables and the Clock Hypothesis2025-05-08T09:18:36ZThis paper considers a new and deeply challenging face of the problem of time in the context of cosmology drawing on the work of Thiemann (2006, 2007). Thiemann argues for a radical response to the cosmic problem of time that requires us to modify the classical Friedmann equations. By contrast, we offer a conservative proposal for solution of the problem by bringing together ideas from the contemporary literature regarding reference frames (Bamonti 2023; Bamonti and Gomes 2024), complete observables (Gryb and Thébault 2016b; Gryb and Thébault 2023), and the model-based account of time measurement (Tal 2016). On our approach, we must reinterpret our criteria of observability in light of the clock hypothesis and the model-based account of measurement in order to preserve the Friedmann equations as the dynamical equations for the universe.2024-11-01T12:44:53ZNicola BamontiKarim P. Y. Thébaulthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04858v1Why Do We Want a Theory of Quantum Gravity?2025-05-07T23:48:42ZThe search for a new scientific theory is typically prompted by an encounter with something in the world that cannot be explained by current theories. This is not the case for the search for a theory of quantum gravity, which has been primarily motivated by theoretical and philosophical concerns. This Element introduces some of the motivations for seeking a theory of quantum gravity, with the aim of instigating a more critical perspective on how they are used in defining and constraining the theory sought. These motivations include unification, incompatibilities between general relativity and quantum field theory, consistency, singularity resolution, and results from black hole thermodynamics.2025-05-07T23:48:42ZPreprint draft for Cambridge Elements in Philosophy of PhysicsKaren Crowtherhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03450v1Einstein, Evolution of Knowledge, and the Anthropocene: A Critical Reading of Jürgen Renn's Historiography2025-05-06T11:46:25ZThis article offers a critical engagement with Jürgen Renn's historiographical approach, with particular focus on "The Evolution of Knowledge" and "The Einsteinian Revolution" (co-authored with Hanoch Gutfreund). It explores how Renn reinterprets Albert Einstein's contributions to modern physics, especially special and general relativity, not primarily as the product of individual insight, but as emergent from broader epistemic structures and long-term knowledge systems. The discussion centers on key concepts such as "challenging objects," "epistemic matrices," "mental models," and "borderline problems," and situates Renn's framework within broader debates involving Thomas Kuhn, Ludwik Fleck, and Mara Beller. While recognizing the historiographical strengths of Renn's structuralist approach, the article raises questions about its implications for understanding individual agency, conceptual creativity, and the philosophical dimensions of scientific change. The paper contends that a balanced account of scientific innovation must preserve both the historical embeddedness of knowledge and the originality of conceptual breakthroughs.2025-05-06T11:46:25ZGalina Weinsteinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03092v1Uma breve história do spin2025-05-06T01:09:04ZA brief analysis is made of some historical points involved in the consolidation of the theoretical concept of \textit{spin}, originally introduced to explain the structure of atomic spectra in the absence and presence of electromagnetic fields, in 1925, by Dutch physicists Samuel Abraham Goudsmit and George Eugene Uhlenbeck. Its relevance in the context of the quantum description of matter is reiterated.2025-05-06T01:09:04Z26 pages, 7 figuresFrancisco CarusoVitor Ogurihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10265v3The Ancient Egyptian Cosmological Vignette: First Visual Evidence of the Milky Way and Trends in Coffin Depictions of the Sky Goddess Nut2025-04-30T21:32:24ZHere, I test the long-held assumption that the ancient Egyptian sky goddess Nut represented the Milky Way by examining Nut's visual depictions on ancient Egyptian coffins. I assemble a catalog of 555 coffin elements, including 118 cosmological vignettes from the 21st/22nd Dynasties, and report several observations. First, the cosmological vignette on the outer coffin of Nesitaudjatakhet bears a unique feature: a thick, undulating black curve that bisects Nut's star-studded body and recalls the Great Rift that cleaves the Milky Way in two. Similar undulating curves bisect the astronomical ceiling in the tomb of Seti I and appear as part of depictions of Nut in the tombs of Ramesses IV, VI, and IX. Moreover, the undulating curve resembles similar features identified as the Milky Way on the bodies of Navajo, Hopi, and Zuni spiritual beings. Hence, I argue that the undulating curve is a visual representation of the Milky Way and that it supports a previously suggested identification of the Winding Waterway as the Galaxy's Egyptian name. However, the rarity of this feature strengthens the conclusion reached by Graur (2024a): Though Nut and the Milky Way are linked, they are not synonymous. Instead of acting as a representation of Nut, the Milky Way is one more celestial phenomenon that, like the Sun and the stars, is associated with Nut in her role as the sky. Second, Nut's body is decorated with stars in only a quarter of the cosmological vignettes, suggesting that the Egyptians of the 21st/22nd Dynasties may have had a marked preference for the day sky over the night sky. Finally, I discuss the interplay between Nut's cosmological vignette and full-length portraits inside coffins from the New Kingdom to the Roman Period in the context of Nut's combined cosmological and eschatological roles as an embodiment of the coffin.2024-09-16T13:15:15Z28 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication by JAHHOr Graur10.3724/SP.J.140-2807.2025.01.06http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21179v1How Anomalous is the Electron's Magnetic Moment?2025-04-29T21:12:47ZThe electron's spin magnetic moment is ordinarily described as anomalous in comparison to what one would expect from the Dirac equation. But, what exactly should one expect from the Dirac equation? The standard answer would be the Bohr magneton, which is a simple estimate of the electron's spin magnetic moment that can be derived from the Dirac equation either by taking the non-relativistic limit to arrive at the Pauli equation or by examining the Gordon decomposition of the electron's current density. However, these derivations ignore two effects that are central to quantum field theoretic calculations of the electron's magnetic moment: self-interaction and mass renormalization. Those two effects can and should be incorporated when analyzing the Dirac equation, to better isolate the distinctive improvements of quantum field theory. Either of the two aforementioned derivations can be modified accordingly. Doing so yields a magnetic moment that depends on the electron's state (even among $z$-spin up states). This poses a puzzle for future research: How does the move to quantum field theory take you from a state-dependent magnetic moment to a fixed magnetic moment?2025-04-29T21:12:47Z30 pages, 3 figuresFoundations of Physics 55, 48 (2025)Charles T. Sebens10.1007/s10701-025-00846-1http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11503v1The Impact and Influence of Academic Genealogies2025-04-29T15:02:10ZWe introduce the concept of an academic genealogy, or AG, and illustrate how AG charts may be constructed and then demonstrate how this methodology can be used by applying it to create the partial or full AG charts to two scientists, Paul A. Samuelson and Ronald E. Mickens.2025-04-29T15:02:10ZBryan BrionesRonald E. MickensCharmayne Pattersonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08621v6Born rule: quantum probability as classical probability2025-04-28T14:37:38ZI provide a simple derivation of the Born rule as giving a classical probability, that is, the ratio of the measure of favorable states of the system to the measure of its total possible states.
In classical systems, the probability is due to the fact that the same macrostate can be realized in different ways as a microstate. Despite the radical differences between quantum and classical systems, I show that the same can be applied to quantum systems, and the result is the Born rule.
This works only if the basis is continuous (an eigenbasis of observables with continuous spectra), but all known physically realistic measurements involve a continuous basis (the position basis).
The continuous basis is not unique, and for subsystems it depends on the observable.
But for the entire universe, there are continuous bases that give the Born rule for all measurements, because all measurements reduce to distinguishing macroscopic pointer states, and macroscopic observations commute. This allows for the possibility of a unique ontic basis for the entire universe.
In the wavefunctional formulation, the basis can be chosen to consist of classical field configurations, and the coefficients $Ψ[φ]$ can be made real by absorbing them into a global U(1) gauge.
For the many-worlds interpretation, this result gives the Born rule from micro-branch counting.2022-09-18T18:13:00Z24 pages, 2 figures. Final versionInt J Theor Phys 64, 117 (2025)Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica10.1007/s10773-025-05979-7