Mutual Recognition in the Philosophy of Physics: QBism, Phenomenology, Hegel

2026-08-18T07:57:40Z

Recent discussions of QBism have turned increasingly toward the question of its ontology. I argue that key insights into QBism's ontology of agency can be identified by reconstructing its response to Wigner's friend paradox. I clarify the relation between two formulations of that response: one grounded in the claim that quantum states are agents' personal probability assignments, and another grounded in the injunction to treat all users of quantum theory as agents on equal footing. Once disambiguated, these formulations reveal an implicit commitment to a mutually recognitive conception of agency, according to which the agential status of a user of quantum theory depends constitutively on the acknowledgement of other agents. This analysis clarifies what is at stake in recent QBist engagements with phenomenology - namely, the search for a more philosophically robust account of this conception of agency. I show how Merleau-Ponty's account of intersubjectivity underpins the recognitive structure implicated in QBism before tracing these themes to Hegel's account of mutual recognition. By locating QBism within a longstanding tradition of mutual recognition, I claim that we not only illuminate its theoretical structure but also open up novel conceptual resources for the rigorous articulation and justification of its ontology.

Phenomenological quantum mechanics: II. Deducing the formalism from experimental observations

2026-08-16T07:51:22Z

We propose an exercise in which one attempts to deduce the formalism of quantum mechanics solely from phenomenological observations. The only assumed inputs are the multi-time probability distributions estimated from the results of sequential measurements of quantum observables; no presuppositions about the underlying mathematical structures are permitted. In the concluding Part II of the paper, we carry out the deduction of the formalism from the phenomenological inputs described in Part I. We show that the resulting formalism exhibits an affinity with Hilbert spaces, and we derive an explicit representation in terms of those mathematical structures. Analogues of the obtained elementary building blocks -- such as projection operators -- are readily identifiable within the standard formalism. However, once these building blocks are assembled according to the blueprint of the deduced bi-trajectory formalism, it becomes evident that the new and the standard formalisms differ substantially at the conceptual level. These differences do not negate the fact that both formalisms are in perfect agreement with respect to empirically testable predictions. Rather, the emergence of a novel, non-standard formulation should be seen as a relatively rare opportunity to reassess, from a fresh perspective, some of the long-standing foundational issues in the theory. The hope is that the new approach may prove more successful in addressing problems that have resisted resolution within the established theoretical framework.

Phenomenological quantum mechanics: I. Phenomenology of quantum observables

2026-08-16T07:44:38Z

We propose an exercise in which one attempts to deduce the formalism of quantum mechanics solely from phenomenological observations. The only assumed inputs are obtained through sequential probing of quantum systems; no presuppositions about the underlying mathematical structures are permitted. We demonstrate that it is indeed possible to derive, on this basis, a complete and fully functional formalism rooted in the structures of Hilbert spaces. However, the resulting formalism--the bi-trajectory formalism--differs significantly from the standard state-focused formulation. In Part I of the paper, we analyze the outcomes of various experiments involving sequential measurements of quantum observables. These outcomes are quantitatively described by phenomenological multi-time probability distributions, estimated from experimental data. Our first conclusion is that the theory describing these experiments must be non-classical: the measured sequences cannot be interpreted as sampling of a uni-trajectory representing the system's observable. The non-classical nature of the investigated systems manifests in a range of observed phenomena, including quantum interference, the quantum Zeno effect, and uncertainty relations between the measured observables.

Scientific understanding across disciplines: in varietate concordia?

2026-08-14T15:17:56Z

Understanding is a generally acknowledged aim of science, but the way in which understanding is pursued and criteria for when it is achieved differ widely across scientific disciplines. This paper offers a comparative analysis of this disciplinary variation, aimed at revealing differences as well as commonalities in methods and criteria for achieving understanding. Starting point is the contextual theory of scientific understanding (De Regt 2017), which was developed to accommodate contextual variation in criteria for understanding. While this work focused on historical variation and used mainly case studies from the history of physics, the current paper applies the contextual theory to disciplinary variation. We present brief descriptive accounts of how understanding figures in nine scientific disciplines: mathematics, theoretical physics, astrophysics, chemistry, geoscience, biology, neuroscience, psychology, and the engineering sciences. Subsequently, we compare and evaluate these accounts in light of the contextual theory of scientific understanding.

Structural Divergence of the Inca Imperial Network, 1400--1572~CE: Persistent Homology, Substitution Topology, and the Topological Signature of Decapitation Collapse

2026-08-14T01:03:31Z

We apply persistent homology to a six-layer temporal network model of the Inca Empire (Tawantinsuyu), built from the Qhapaq Ñan road system ($6{,}546$ segments; $12{,}031$~km): 4,492 nodes (4,452 active; 40 isolated removed), $4{,}358$ edges, $57$ temporal snapshots (1400--1572~CE). The complete flag complex yields $β_1 = 32$ cycles ($26$ macro-continental, $6$ meso-regional) and $β_0 = 264$ components at the finest filtration, evaluated across six layers: infrastructure, Inca political control, Spanish alliance growth, Andean tribute commerce, and Spanish legal/effective administration. Five results. (i) Infrastructure entropy $H_{\mathrm{infra}}=1.486\pm0.0001$ stays constant throughout, indicating no detectable topological disruption of the Qhapaq Ñan at this resolution. (ii) Inca political entropy $H_{\mathrm{inca}}$ is stable through the Cajamarca capture (1532~CE), then collapses to zero by 1537~CE; the dominant break is at Vilcabamba ($F=120.7$), not Cajamarca ($F=11.5$). (iii) Four of six layers reach the critical regime at 1532~CE, while infrastructure stays marginally below threshold ($\mathrm{ICT}=0.495$); trade and political reach the highest values ($\mathrm{ICT}=0.976$, $0.968$), marking Cajamarca as a synchronised multi-layer phase transition. (iv) Spanish legal administration converges to the infrastructure topology by 1572~CE ($W_1=5\times10^{-6}\approx0$): Substitution Topology, infrastructure-preserving collapse via topology transfer. (v) Legal--effective divergence decays from $W_1=0.591$ (1532) to $0.002$ (1572), quantifying resolution of colonial legal fiction. Together, these results support a distinct collapse mode---Substitution Topology---differing from erosion-dominated Roman/Byzantine collapse, Han fragmentation, and Aztec military destruction.

A Dual Topological Pipeline for Imperial Network Analysis: Persistent Homology, Structural Fragility, and the Aztec Collapse

2026-08-14T00:40:14Z

We apply persistent homology and a dual-model topological pipeline to a multilayer network of the Aztec Empire (Triple Alliance, 1427--1521 CE), constructed from tribute records and geographic adjacency among 38 nodes (Tenochtitlan-Centro, 36 tribute-paying provinces, and the Tlaxcala enclave) and 208 edges. We report four main results: (i) The tribute (control) layer is a pure extraction tree ($\bettione = 0$, $H = 0.000$ at all epochs): structurally more fragile than any documented configuration in the Roman, Byzantine, or Han administrative datasets analyzed with the same pipeline. (ii) Single-node removal of Tenochtitlan-Centro collapses the giant component from 1.000 to 0.630 and eliminates 30 redundancy cycles simultaneously, a structural asymmetry ratio of $>4$:1 relative to random perturbation. (iii) The Tlaxcala--Puebla region coincides with the dominant $\bettione$ class of the imperial geographic point cloud (persistence $= 22.09$~km, versus $< 3$~km for all others), a structural void that exists identically whether Tlaxcala is modeled as absent or present in the filtration. (iv) A logistic regression confirms that commercial centrality in the geographic layer ($r = +0.462$, $p = 0.004$) is the dominant predictor of early alliance formation, while tribute burden is uncorrelated ($r = -0.033$, $p = 0.845$). These four results define a new imperial collapse mode, the \emph{void-occupied tree}, in which zero topological redundancy in the control layer coincides with a dominant geometric void occupied by an autonomous enclave---a configuration not previously documented in historical network TDA.

Quantum Processes under Epistemic Constraints

2026-08-13T23:05:49Z

This doctoral dissertation on the foundations of quantum theory isolates and then formalizes a physically relevant concept that I have called "Epistemic Constraint." Here, epistemic constraints are the definite, intersubjectively agreeable, ordinary-language conditions under which experiments are described. The usual formulation of the quantum measurement problem, which I call the Schrodingerian measurement problem, has the structure of an anomaly: if we take quantum theory at face value, we expect no definite values, and yet we see definite values in experiments. The responses to this problem have been either to solve it or to dissolve it. These responses, which have taken the form of interpretation, modification, or reconstruction of quantum mechanics, seek either to derive (conceptually or mathematically) epistemic constraints from within quantum mechanics or suitable modifications of it, as is the case with certain interpretations and modifications, or to posit the epistemic constraint, or parts of it, as a primitive assumption with the goal of deriving quantum mechanics, as is the case in some reconstruction programs. In contrast to the Schrodingerian measurement problem, which had the structure of an anomaly, this dissertation develops the Bohrian Program, which (for lack of a better comparison) has a structure similar to the problem historically associated with Euclid's fifth postulate. It seeks to keep epistemic constraints as primitive in an onto-epistemic sense. It then seeks new physical conclusions from the joint consideration of quantum mechanics and epistemic constraints, without seeking to derive one from the other. Among other results, this leads to a notion of the probability of instantiability of the Born Rule that specifies when to apply the Born Rule and when to apply a unitary transformation to a quantum state.

From the Earth to the Sun

2026-08-13T15:50:17Z

This year marks 360 years since the founding of the French Academy of Sciences. This is the story of the academy's daring 17th century expedition to measure the Earth-sun distance. A truncated version first appeared in National Geographic Magazine; the following is closer to the original draft, with updated information and references.

Charge quantisation without compactness: the Higgs and Yukawa mechanisms from matter geometry

2026-08-12T22:54:57Z

In the \emph{geometry-first} formulation of gauge theory \citep{Gomes_internal}, Hermitian vector bundles and their covariant derivatives are the primitive objects. Here gauge groups arise only as the automorphism groups of a small set of structured fundamental fibres, and every matter field is a section of a tensor product of the fundamental bundles. This is a constraint on gauge theories. In the abelian sector it enforces charge quantisation, even without compactness: charges count tensor powers of a fundamental line bundle, so they lie on an integral lattice even when the automorphism group is the non-compact $\mathbb{C}^\times$, whereas a symmetry-first theory built on $\mathbb{R}$ admits irrationally related charges. The Standard Model satisfies the constraint, and its two mass-generating mechanisms follow from the fibre geometry. The Higgs mechanism arises from the second fundamental form of the sub-bundle singled out by the Higgs vacuum. This works with no appeal to symmetry breaking or Goldstone's theorem, and the full electroweak spectrum, $m_W=m_Z\cosθ_W$ included, is computed from the same operator. Each Yukawa coupling is the canonical fibrewise contraction fixed by the inner products and volume forms of the fundamental bundles. Exceptional gauge groups remain formally presentable, but on progressively less elementary fibre structure; at $E_8$ the fundamental fibre is the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{e}_8$ itself, and the claim of conceptual priority collapses. A companion paper shows the two formulations are not equivalent, in a categorical sense \citep{Gomes_nonequiv}.

The Duality of Whittaker Potential Theory: Fundamental Representations of Electromagnetism and Gravity, and Their Orthogonality

2026-08-12T11:38:50Z

E. T. Whittaker produced two papers in 1903 and 1904 that, although sometimes considered mere mathematical statements (Barrett, 1993), held important implications for physical theory. The Whittaker 1903 paper united electrostatic and gravitational attraction as resulting from longitudinal waves - waves whose wavefronts propagate parallel to their direction. The Whittaker 1904 paper showed that electromagnetic waves resulted from the interference of two such longitudinal waves or scalar potential functions. Although unexplored, the implications of these papers are profound: gravitational lensing, gravitational waves, the Aharonov-Bohm effect, the existence of a hyperspace above or behind normal space, the elimination of gravitational and point charge singularities, MOND, and the expansion of the universe. This last implication can be related to the recent finding that black holes with posited vacuum energy interior solutions alongside cosmological boundaries have a cosmological coupling constant of k=3, meaning that black holes gain mass-proportional to a3 in a parameterization equation within a Robertson-Walker cosmology and are a cosmological accelerated expansion species (Farrah et al., 2023). This expansion and many features of General Relativity can be explained by the mass-proportionality and preferred direction of the longitudinal waves within the two underlying non-local Whittaker potentials (Titleman, 2022). Expansion of the universe is produced as longitudinal motion within the Whittaker potentials only when dynamic electromagnetism is separate from time-static gravity in intergalactic space.

Time Travel Paradoxes and Entangled Timelines

2026-08-11T04:08:34Z

For time travel to be consistent with the known laws of physics, the resulting paradoxes must be resolved. It has been suggested that parallel timelines (a.k.a. multiple histories) may provide a resolution. However, so far, a concrete mechanism by which parallel timelines can be created has never been satisfactorily formulated. In this paper we propose such a mechanism based on the Everett (many-worlds) interpretation of quantum mechanics, together with a linear pure-state CTC consistency condition. The timelines in our model are emergent, like the "worlds" of the Everett interpretation; they are created by the entanglement of the time machine with the environment and the resulting decoherence. Therefore, we call them "entangled timelines" or E-CTCs. As the entanglement gradually spreads out to additional systems, the timelines spread out as well, providing a local and well-defined alternative to the naive "branching timelines" picture often presented in the literature. The E-CTC model is similar to Deutsch's familiar D-CTC model, but differs from it mainly by keeping the entangled state explicit and imposing a different consistency condition. These differences allow us to create a clearer practical definition of the resulting parallel timelines.

Was Schrödinger ever a determinist?

2026-08-10T19:30:17Z

Erwin Schrödinger is often portrayed as a reactionary who resisted the indeterminism introduced by quantum mechanics, but on closer inspection his views on determinism prove to be more complex and more radical.

Newton's Second Law: A Theoretical Identity Derived from the Principle of Excluded Perpetual Motion and the Weak Equivalence Principle

2026-08-06T16:57:12Z

For more than three centuries, Newton's Second Law (F=ma) has governed mechanics with undisputed success, yet its epistemic authority has rested on empirical adequacy alone. That empirical contingency vanishes under two physical principles - the Principle of Excluded Perpetual Motion (PEPM) and the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) - from which the law emerges as a structural necessity of admissible mechanics. Under the PEPM constraint, Suppes' operational measurement protocol grounds gravitational mass and force as independent primitives. The fusion of Stevin's static and Galileo's kinematic inclined-plane analyses establishes F/a as a well-defined, object-intrinsic quantity - the operational definition of inertial mass. The WEP compels the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass without presupposing Newton's Second Law. Substituting this equivalence into the definition of inertial mass yields the law as a theoretical identity between independently defined quantities. The derivation is anchored in gravity because weight uniquely bridges statics and kinematics, yet the result is independent of the underlying force mechanism. The derivation carries structural consequences: modified-inertia formulations of MOND are inadmissible under the PEPM-WEP constraint; the location-invariance of the Kibble-balance realization of the SI kilogram is secured on first principles; and under the PEPM alone, torsion-balance and free-fall experiments constitute equally direct tests of the WEP. More fundamentally, Newton's Second Law is not an irreducible axiom of mechanics, but a structural consequence of deeper physical principles: energy conservation and the Einstein Equivalence Principle.

The Informational Observer in Relational Quantum Mechanics

2026-08-06T15:23:37Z

Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) treats quantum states as observer-dependent facts rather than absolute properties. While this relational stance is conceptually attractive, it raises concerns about empirical confirmation, particularly in multi-observer scenarios. Existing responses within RQM focus on securing agreement between observers by strengthening the status, stability, or accessibility of recorded outcomes. However, they leave open a more basic question: what grounds the persistence of an observer across time? Scientific observation presupposes stable records and the capacity to relate outcomes across successive measurements. We argue that the minimal definition of the observer in RQM as a merely interacting physical system is insufficient to support this requirement. We propose a complementary account of the observer that distinguishes physical interaction from informational coherence, and show how this distinction supports empirical confirmation in Wigner's friend-type scenarios.

A Scale-Invariant Theory of the Universe

2026-08-06T11:58:49Z

Modern physics has achieved extraordinary empirical success while retaining much of the absolute, unobservable structure introduced by Newton, largely without questioning its necessity. We investigate how far this structure can be eliminated by adopting a relational ontology guided by Leibniz's principle of sufficient reason. Removing absolute position, orientation, time and, finally, scale leads naturally to a formulation of the gravitational $N$-body problem where only dimensionless ratios are physically meaningful. Within this framework, the scale-invariant variety $V$ becomes a central quantity, providing a measure of structure, a natural ordering of shapes, and an emergent gravitational arrow of time. We argue that the resulting formulation unifies classes of Newtonian solutions previously regarded as distinct, uncovering a possible new symmetry, suggests a notion of explanation based on timeless spatial correlations rather than temporal evolution, and points towards a more economical ontology. Although developed in the context of Newtonian gravity, the principles proposed here may also offer a new perspective on general relativity and quantum mechanics.