https://arxiv.org/api/kkbcDrlnCw2PdFVushUf8AbVihU 2026-06-09T22:21:46Z 5605 45 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17150v2 2026-04-30T14:24:07Z

I argue that if a special science satisfies certain key assumptions that are familiar from physicalist accounts of the special sciences and from physics, then its causal regularities have an associated notion of entropy, and that this causal entropy cannot decrease from a robust cause to its effect. Due to its analogy with the second laws of thermodynamics and statistical physics, I call the latter conclusion the causal second law. In this paper, I clarify the key assumptions, prove the causal second law, give sufficient conditions for causal entropy increase, relate the causal second law to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, and argue that the reversibility objection does not threaten it. In addition, I claim that the causal second law is compatible with a non-metaphysical understanding of supervenience and the open systems view, argue that it does not imply a causal time arrow, reflect on relaxing the robustness condition, question whether it is necessary to invoke thermodynamics to show that special sciences' time arrows exist, and discuss a transition-relative-frequency-based, special-science-internal characterization of causal regularities.

2026-02-19T07:50:42Z Published in Nous: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/nous.70042 Nous 2026; 00:1--17 Balazs Gyenis 10.1111/nous.70042 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06346v2 2026-04-30T10:33:38Z

Certain approaches to quantum gravity, such as the one based on the concept of purely virtual particles (fakeons), sacrifice the cause-effect relation at very small scales to reconcile renormalizability with unitarity. Other developments have also urged caution regarding the idea of causality as a fundamental principle. In this paper, we examine the problem from multiple perspectives, including locality and predictivity, and extend the existing skepticism in several directions. Emphasizing the impact of unruly "disruptors", we point out that the illusory arrow of time associated with causality and predictivity is inherently statistical. This renders the cause-effect relation strained at the microscopic level. We also show that causation is a borderline concept that demands belief in entities which can act on nature without being part of it. Ultimately, not only is renouncing microcausality a reasonable price to pay for a consistent and predictive theory of quantum gravity (as is the one based on the fakeon idea), but the very notion of causality is misleading. Resting as it does on metaphysical assumptions, it should therefore be abandoned in fundamental physics.

2026-01-09T22:55:42Z 35 pages, 1 figure; v2: minor changes, Found Phys version Found Phys 56, 27 (2026) Damiano Anselmi 10.1007/s10701-026-00928-8 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27525v1 2026-04-30T07:28:29Z

We prove that the Lorentz--FitzGerald contraction is the unique deformation of a resonant cavity moving through a mechanical wave medium that preserves spherical-harmonic phase closure. For a cavity moving at speed $v = βc$ through a medium supporting nondispersive wave propagation at speed $c$, the round-trip phase of an internal ray at angle $θ$ to the motion depends on the boundary radius $r(θ)$ according to $Φ(θ) = 2k\,r(θ)\sqrt{1-β^2\sin^2θ}/(1-β^2)$. Requiring $Φ(θ)$ to be independent of $θ$ -- the necessary condition for retaining a spherical-harmonic eigenstructure -- uniquely fixes the Lorentzian aspect ratio \[ \frac{a_\parallel}{a_\perp} = \frac{1}γ = \sqrt{1-β^2}. \] Substituting this unique boundary into the round-trip time yields the resonant period dilation $T = γT_0$, without additional assumptions. Both results -- contraction and dilation -- follow from a single mechanical constraint: preservation of eigenstructure under motion. This is the missing uniqueness theorem of the constructive relativity program initiated by FitzGerald, Lorentz, and Heaviside: the proof that Lorentzian kinematics are not merely consistent with, but uniquely required by, phase closure in a mechanical wave medium.

2026-04-30T07:28:29Z 7 pages Shiva Meucci 10.5281/zenodo.19880350 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00057v1 2026-04-29T22:24:38Z

In his 1972 book Science At the Crossroads, Helbert Dingle attacked the consistency of special relativity through a fallacious argument championed by the crank community even to this day. Dingle's affair is a curious chapter in the history of physics and, more generally, science. We briefly review Dingle's case from a historical and didactic perspective.

2026-04-29T22:24:38Z The Physics Educator, Vol 7, 2550004, 2025 Justo Pastor Lambare 10.1142/S2661339525500040 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24829v1 2026-04-27T17:00:06Z

The Varenna school is a hub where generations of physicists, including numerous Nobel laureates, have shaped the field, often through collaborative exchanges across political and cultural boundaries. We examine the scientific legacy of Enrico Fermi and its influence on modern atomic, molecular, and optical physics. Beginning with Fermi's 1954 lectures at the Varenna school, key developments are traced from high-energy physics to laser spectroscopy, precision metrology, and the control of ultracold atoms. Milestones such as Doppler-free spectroscopy, optical frequency combs, Bose-Einstein condensation, and degenerate Fermi gases are highlighted as turning points leading to quantum simulation and quantum computation. Fermi's early advocacy for building a computer, rather than buying it, can be viewed as a precursor to today's efforts in quantum science and technologies. This historical trajectory and legacy continues to inform current research in quantum matter and information science.

2026-04-27T17:00:06Z This manuscript has been submitted to appear in the Proceedings of the Course 214 "Quantum Computers and Simulators with Atoms" of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" (Varenna, July 2024) Vladislav Gavryusev Massimo Inguscio http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24503v1 2026-04-27T14:06:04Z

Total solar eclipses (TSEs) offer a unique opportunity to observe the solar atmosphere, detect limb phenomena, and accurately measure the solar radius. Following the TSE in 1733, Wassenius first reported the existence of prominences to the scientific community. Wassenius' original manuscript is held in the Royal Academy Archives of Sweden; this study translates his report and documents the associated source materials and local eclipse visibility. The solar radius (R_Sun) during the TSE in 1733 are 696250 +/- 170 km and 959.99 +/- 0.24" in the absolute and apparent scales, respectively. This result contrasts with the modern standard (helioseismic) R_Sun of 695780 +/- 160 km and 959.34 +/- 0.22"; however, it is consistent with the solar radius recorded in 1715. The observed prominences are located at +23.5 +/- 22.5°, +66.5 +/- 22.5°, and -68.5 +/- 22.5° in the heliographic latitude. The appearance of prominences at such high latitudes contrasts with the sunspot butterfly diagram for 1725-1750, confirming 1733 as a solar minimum. These high-latitude prominences can potentially be attributed to the so-called 'polar rush' prominences that appear a few years after a solar minimum. If they are categorised as 'polar rush' prominences, the solar minimum must be re-dated to before 1733 May. Furthermore, the latitudes of at least two of the prominences reported by Wassenius enable their classification as quiescent prominences, suggesting the presence of a polarity inversion line in the polar regions in early 1733.

2026-04-27T14:06:04Z 20 pages and 5 figures The Astrophysical Journal, 2026 Hisashi Hayakawa Mitsuru Sôma Noortje Peek Jean-Pierre Rozelot Stanislav Gunár Alexei Pevtsov 10.3847/1538-4357/ae6451 http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06927v3 2026-04-26T18:51:38Z

A simplified method to calculate the critical mass of a fissile material sphere is presented. This is a purely pedagogical study, in part to elucidate the historical evolution of criticality calculations. This method employs only elementary calculus and straightforward statistical arguments by formulating the problem in terms of the threshold condition that the number of neutrons in the sphere does not change with time; the average neutron path length in the material must be long enough to produce enough fission neutrons to balance losses by absorption due to nuclear reactions and leakage through the surface. This separates the nuclear reaction part of the problem from the geometry and mechanics of neutron transport, the only connection being the total path length which together with the distance between scatterings determines the sphere radius. This leads to an expression for the critical radius without the need to solve the diffusion equation. Comparison with known critical masses shows agreement at the few-percent level. The analysis can also be applied to impure materials, isotopically or otherwise, and can be extended to general neutronics estimations as a design guide or for order-of-magnitude checking of Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) simulations. A comparison is made with the Oppenheimer-Bethe criticality formula, with the results of other calculations, and with the diffusion equation approach via a new treatment of the boundary conditions.

2025-06-07T21:30:57Z Principle manuscript 8 pages, two figures; supplemental material 6 pages, two figures; added a rate equation solution in Appendix F, corrected typos. New version addresses 234U Steven K. Lamoreaux http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21715v2 2026-04-24T19:49:29Z

This paper argues that dataset structure is important in image recognition tasks (among other tasks). Specifically, we focus on the nature and genesis of correlational structure in the actual datasets upon which DNNs are trained. We argue that DNNs are implementing a widespread methodology in condensed matter physics and materials science that focuses on mesoscale correlation structures that live between fundamental atomic/molecular scales and continuum scales. Specifically, we argue that DNNs that are successful in image classification must be discovering high order correlation functions. It is well-known that DNNs successfully generalize in apparent contravention of standard statistical learning theory. We consider the implications of our discussion for this puzzle.

2025-11-18T18:38:21Z 37 pages, 12 figures Robert W. Batterman James F. Woodward http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21437v2 2026-04-24T14:05:52Z

Technological understanding is not a singular concept but varies depending on context. Building on De Jong and De Haro's (2025) notion of technological understanding as the ability to realise an aim through the use of a technological artefact, this paper refines the concept as an ability that differs by context and degree. We extend the original specification developed for a design context by introducing two additional contexts: operation and innovation. Each context represents a distinct way of realising an aim through technology, yielding three types of technological understanding. To clarify the nature of technological understanding further, we propose an assessment framework based on counterfactual reasoning. Each type of understanding is associated with the ability to answer a specific set of what-if questions concerning changes in an artefact's structure, performance, or appropriateness. Distinguishing these different types helps focus efforts to improve technological understanding, clarifies the epistemic requirements of different forms of engagement with technology, and supports a pluralistic perspective on expertise.

2025-03-27T12:23:25Z Key words: Technological understanding, scientific understanding, technological artefacts, design, operation, innovation, counterfactual reasoning, expertise Eline de Jong Sebastian De Haro http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02923v1 2026-04-23T14:14:57Z

Experimental science usually relies on laboratory procedures that, after finitely many steps, terminate with numerical reports on physical quantities. This paper argues that such procedures can be understood as algorithmic once the protocol, background conditions, and reporting rules are fixed. Assuming an explicit physical Church--Turing bridge principle, a reproducible experiment therefore computes a map from admissible inputs to outputs, and the corresponding function exists in the sense appropriate to those outputs. Furthermore, computable analysis allows us to explain why this conclusion is compatible with finite-precision measurement since in this case what matters is a systematic approximation to a requested accuracy, not the production of exact real numbers in a single step. Neither protocol dependence nor stochasticity undermines the existence claim. Rather, they specify which map is realized by a given protocol and what additional assumptions are required for stronger claims about a single protocol-independent quantity. The paper therefore separates three questions that are often conflated: whether the function exists, whether it is computable, and when results obtained under different protocols may be treated as measurements of the same quantity.

2026-04-23T14:14:57Z Isaac Pérez Castillo http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21373v1 2026-04-23T07:38:35Z

We consider two-dimensional harmonic oscillator in the complex Bargmann-Fock-Segal representation with $T^*{\mathbb R}^{2}={\mathbb C}^2$ as classical phase space. We show that the eigenfunctions $ψ_n$ of the quantum Hamiltonian correspond to complex radial coordinates in the reduced phase space ${\mathbb C}^2/{\mathbb Z}_n\subset{\mathbb C}^2$. They describe ${\mathbb Z}_n$-invariant motion of particle along a circle $S^1$ in lens space $S^3/{\mathbb Z}_n\subset{\mathbb C}^2/{\mathbb Z}_n$, where ${\mathbb Z}_n$ is the cyclic group of rotation by an angle $2π/n$ on the circle $S^1$, $n=1,2,...\,$. Thus the general solution of the Schrödinger equation carries information about an infinite number of admissible classical states $ψ_n$ that can be mapped to other states after lifting into the quantum bundle. We show that in the Kepler/hydrogen atom problem there is a similar correspondence between classical and quantum states.

2026-04-23T07:38:35Z 30 pages Alexander D. Popov http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05004v3 2026-04-23T00:10:45Z

What is the meaning of physical causal closure? Jaegwon Kim explicitly adopts a conception of causation according to which physical causation is effectively identified with deterministic physical lawfulness, and equates it with physical determinism. While this conception is internally coherent, it differs from currently dominant theories of causation. Physics and the theory of causation serve different descriptive purposes. In this study, we refer to them, respectively, as the Physical Stance and the Causal Stance. Within this framework, physical determinism belongs to the Physical Stance, and physical causal closure is defined only within the Causal Stance. Consequently, the two should not be equated. On this basis, this study reconstructs Davidson's anomalous monism as a materialist position that acknowledges mental causation without contradicting physical determinism. Furthermore, we propose a linguistic framework in which physical causal closure does not hold in the Causal Stance while physical determinism remains intact in the Physical Stance.

2026-04-06T08:20:46Z Yoshiyuki Ohmura Yasuo Kuniyoshi http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13510v3 2026-04-22T00:35:04Z

Though neural networks trained on large datasets have been successfully used to describe and predict many physical phenomena, there is a sense among scientists that, unlike traditional scientific models comprising simple mathematical expressions, their findings cannot be integrated into the body of scientific knowledge. Critics of machine learning's inability to produce human-understandable relationships have converged on the concept of "interpretability" as its point of departure from more traditional forms of science. As the growing interest in interpretability has shown, researchers in the physical sciences seek not just predictive models, but also to uncover the fundamental principles that govern a system of interest. However, clarity around a definition of interpretability and the precise role that it plays in science is lacking in the literature. In this work, we argue that researchers in equation discovery and symbolic regression tend to conflate the concept of sparsity with interpretability. We review key papers on interpretable machine learning from outside the scientific community and argue that, though the definitions and methods they propose can inform questions of interpretability for scientific machine learning (SciML), they are inadequate for this new purpose. Noting these deficiencies, we propose an operational definition of interpretability for the physical sciences. Our notion of interpretability emphasizes understanding of the mechanism over mathematical sparsity. Innocuous though it may seem, this emphasis on mechanism shows that sparsity is often unnecessary. It also questions the possibility of interpretable scientific discovery when prior knowledge is lacking. We believe a precise and philosophically informed definition of interpretability in SciML will help focus research efforts toward the most significant obstacles to realizing a data-driven scientific future.

2025-05-16T20:16:14Z Conor Rowan Alireza Doostan http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18656v1 2026-04-20T09:04:06Z

Prompted by misconceptions in the recent literature, we review the justifications for naturalness arguments and Occam's razor found in Bayesian statistics. We discuss the automatic Occam's razor that emerges in Bayesian formalism, bringing together points of view from diverse fields, including statistics, social sciences, physics and machine learning. In pedagogical calculations, we demonstrate that this automatic razor disfavors unnatural models in which predictions must be fine-tuned to agree with observation.

2026-04-20T09:04:06Z This is the original preprint of an article accepted for publication after revisions Andrew Fowlie 10.1007/s11229-026-05573-2 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17839v1 2026-04-20T05:50:29Z

Recently, Hausmann and Renner have pointed out that several famous paradoxes relating to black holes have a similar character to various Extended Wigner's Friend paradoxes. In this paper I consider what the connection between these things could teach us about the Wigner's Friend scenarios. I argue that if we take the analogy between these cases seriously, the black hole paradoxes appear to favour a certain class of response to the Wigner's Friend scenario - specifically, those which posit intrinsic relationality, rather than effective and emergent relationality, and also those which posit some kind of retrocausality.

2026-04-20T05:50:29Z Forthcoming in European Journal for Philosophy of Science Emily Adlam