https://arxiv.org/api/AQUHHOG/QdKlumW+O8YTSy8Vfr4 2026-06-14T13:04:08Z 5610 420 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04812v2 2025-07-08T07:13:41Z

We propose an exercise in which one attempts to deduce the formalism of quantum mechanics solely from phenomenological observations. The only assumed inputs are the multi-time probability distributions estimated from the results of sequential measurements of quantum observables; no presuppositions about the underlying mathematical structures are permitted. In the concluding Part II of the paper, we carry out the deduction of the formalism from the phenomenological inputs described in Part I. We show that the resulting formalism exhibits an affinity with Hilbert spaces, and we derive an explicit representation in terms of those mathematical structures. Analogues of the obtained elementary building blocks -- such as projection operators -- are readily identifiable within the standard formalism. However, once these building blocks are assembled according to the blueprint of the deduced bi-trajectory formalism, it becomes evident that the new and the standard formalisms differ substantially at the conceptual level. These differences do not negate the fact that both formalisms are in perfect agreement with respect to empirically testable predictions. Rather, the emergence of a novel, non-standard formulation should be seen as a relatively rare opportunity to reassess, from a fresh perspective, some of the long-standing foundational issues in the theory. The hope is that the new approach may prove more successful in addressing problems that have resisted resolution within the established theoretical framework.

2025-07-07T09:31:32Z Part II of a two-part series; Part I: arXiv:2410.14410. Note that the original submission arXiv:2410.14410v1 has been now split into two parts. Submitted to Quantum Journal Piotr Szańkowski Davide Lonigro Fattah Sakuldee Łukasz Cywiński Dariusz Chruściński http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14410v3 2025-07-08T07:03:08Z

We propose an exercise in which one attempts to deduce the formalism of quantum mechanics solely from phenomenological observations. The only assumed inputs are obtained through sequential probing of quantum systems; no presuppositions about the underlying mathematical structures are permitted. We demonstrate that it is indeed possible to derive, on this basis, a complete and fully functional formalism rooted in the structures of Hilbert spaces. However, the resulting formalism--the bi-trajectory formalism--differs significantly from the standard state-focused formulation. In Part I of the paper, we analyze the outcomes of various experiments involving sequential measurements of quantum observables. These outcomes are quantitatively described by phenomenological multi-time probability distributions, estimated from experimental data. Our first conclusion is that the theory describing these experiments must be non-classical: the measured sequences cannot be interpreted as sampling of a uni-trajectory representing the system's observable. The non-classical nature of the investigated systems manifests in a range of observed phenomena, including quantum interference, the quantum Zeno effect, and uncertainty relations between the measured observables.

2024-10-18T12:17:30Z Part I of a two-part series; Part II arXiv:2507.04812. Note that the original submission arXiv:2410.14410v1 has been now split into two parts. Submitted to Quantum Journal Piotr Szańkowski Davide Lonigro Fattah Sakuldee Łukasz Cywiński Dariusz Chruściński http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.05372v1 2025-07-07T18:02:06Z

This document is the Ph.D. thesis of Leonard Parker, submitted to Harvard University in 1966. Over the decades, several generations of physicists have been introduced to the concept of particle creation by gravitational fields, a phenomenon that has become a cornerstone in exploring the interplay between gravitation and quantum theory. Yet, the foundational breakthrough that led to the prediction and understanding of this phenomenon remains unfamiliar to many. In the interest of historical accuracy and in recognition of a seminal contribution to physics, the thesis has been retyped and made it freely available as an open-access (arXiv) document. The reissued thesis is accompanied by a Foreword that places the work in its proper historical context. As the team responsible for this new edition, we (Antonio Ferreiro, José Navarro-Salas, and Silvia Pla) hope that future generations will continue to draw inspiration from this pioneering text.

2025-07-07T18:02:06Z 162 pages, 5 chapters, 6 appendices, 3 figures Leonard E. Parker http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04479v1 2025-07-06T17:27:34Z

Scientific realism is, currently, one of the most well-entrenched background assumptions of some relevant versions of anti-exceptionalism about logic. We argue that this is a sort of sociological contingency rather than a metaphilosophical necessity. Drawing parallels with the metaphysics of science (as applied to quantum foundations), we try to bring the realist assumptions of anti-exceptionalism to light, to demotivate the necessary connection between realism and anti-exceptionalism, briefly exploring the possibility of adopting antirealism as the background default view of science instead.

2025-07-06T17:27:34Z Invited contribution to appear in S Molick, ed. (forthcoming) Demarcating Logic and Science: Exploring New Frontiers. Springer. Submitted: November 27, 2023; Accepted: August 4, 2024 Jonas R. B. Arenhart Raoni Arroyo Ederson Safra Melo http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03582v1 2025-07-04T13:50:38Z

Effective field theories (EFTs) are widely considered by physicists to be explanatory and to be the appropriate frameworks for modelling various phenomena at different scales. At the same time, they are known to be approximate, restricted, and merely effective, and thus, examining them can provide a means of getting traction on philosophical issues such as idealisation, abstraction, and the veridicality of representations in explanation. This paper casts EFTs as \textit{abstract} models of a more fundamental theory that retain all and only the relevant aspects for a given explanandum. I describe abstraction as a process that can preserve explanation top-down from an independently explanatory fundamental theory to an effective theory. Thus the paper aims to show how abstract models, like EFTs, can function as explanatory stand-ins for more fundamental models, something often taken to be unproblematic.

2025-07-04T13:50:38Z Martin King http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03565v1 2025-07-04T13:19:06Z

Scientists do not merely choose to accept fully formed theories, they also have to decide which models to work on before they are fully developed and tested. Since decisive empirical evidence in favour of a model will not yet have been gathered, other criteria must play determining roles. I examine the case of modern high-energy physics where the experimental context that once favoured the pursuit of beautiful, simple, and general theories now favours the pursuit of models that are ad hoc, narrow in scope, and complex; in short, ugly models. The lack of new discoveries since the Higgs boson, together with the lack of a new higher energy collider, has left searches for new physics conceptually and empirically wide open. Physicists must make use of the experiment at hand while also creatively exploring alternatives that have not yet been explored. This encourages the pursuit of models that have at least one of two key features: i) they take radically novel approaches, or ii) are easily testable. I present four cases, neutralino dark matter, the relaxion, repulsive gravity, and models of lepton flavour universality violation, and show that even if they do not exhibit traditional epistemic virtues, they are nonetheless pursuitworthy. I argue that experimental context strongly determines pursuitworthiness and I lay out the conditions under which experiment encourages the pursuit of ugly models.

2025-07-04T13:19:06Z Martin King http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03438v1 2025-07-04T09:53:36Z

The lack of evidence in favor of any new physics models means that the search for new physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) is wide open, with no direction clearly more promising than any other. This marks a turn towards what can be called `model-independent' methods-strategies that reduce the influence of modelling assumptions by performing minimally-biased precision measurements, using effective field theories, or using Deep Learning methods (DL). In this paper, I present the novel and promising uses of DL as a primary tool in high energy physics research, highlighting the use of autoencoder networks and unsupervised learning methods. I advocate for the importance and usefulness of the concept of model independence and propose a definition that recognizes that independence of models is not absolute, but comes in degrees.

2025-07-04T09:53:36Z Martin King http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01483v1 2025-07-02T08:46:24Z

This paper presents a praxeological analysis of artificial intelligence and algorithmic governance, challenging assumptions about the capacity of machine systems to sustain economic and epistemic order. Drawing on Misesian a priori reasoning and Austrian theories of entrepreneurship, we argue that AI systems are incapable of performing the core functions of economic coordination: interpreting ends, discovering means, and communicating subjective value through prices. Where neoclassical and behavioural models treat decisions as optimisation under constraint, we frame them as purposive actions under uncertainty. We critique dominant ethical AI frameworks such as Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT) as extensions of constructivist rationalism, which conflict with a liberal order grounded in voluntary action and property rights. Attempts to encode moral reasoning in algorithms reflect a misunderstanding of ethics and economics. However complex, AI systems cannot originate norms, interpret institutions, or bear responsibility. They remain opaque, misaligned, and inert. Using the concept of epistemic scarcity, we explore how information abundance degrades truth discernment, enabling both entrepreneurial insight and soft totalitarianism. Our analysis ends with a civilisational claim: the debate over AI concerns the future of human autonomy, institutional evolution, and reasoned choice. The Austrian tradition, focused on action, subjectivity, and spontaneous order, offers the only coherent alternative to rising computational social control.

2025-07-02T08:46:24Z 47 pages - submission to QJAE Craig S Wright http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11736v1 2025-07-01T18:26:32Z

This paper presents correspondence between Albert Einstein and the mathematical analyst J. L. B. Cooper on the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox of quantum theory published in 1935. Two letters written by Cooper, and the replies from Einstein, all written between October and December 1949, are retyped from the original ones. Furthermore, Einstein's second letter, which he wrote in German, is translated into English. The lack of agreement, arising from very different points of view, is analysed, taking into account the complex underlying mathematical and physical factors that arise naturally in connection with the EPR paradox.

2025-07-01T18:26:32Z 15 pages, 1 figure P. L. Butzer Lehrstuhl A für Mathematik, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany D. E. Edmunds Department of Mathematics, University of Sussex, Brighton, U. K G. Roepstorff Department of Mathematics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany G. Schmeisser Department of Mathematics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany R. L. Stens Lehrstuhl A für Mathematik, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00098v1 2025-06-30T12:23:50Z

This work explores the connection between logical independence and the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics. Building on results by Brukner et al., it introduces the notion of \textit{onto-epistemic ignorance}: situations in which the truth of a proposition is not deducible due to an objective breakdown in the phenomenal chain that transmits information from a system A to a system B, rather than to any subjective lack of knowledge. It is shown that, under such conditions, the probabilities accessible to a real observer are necessarily conditioned by decidability and obey a non-commutative algebra, formally equivalent to the fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics.

2025-06-30T12:23:50Z Marcello Poletti 10.1007/s10701-025-00868-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.23450v1 2025-06-30T01:24:26Z

This paper develops the approach to special relativity put forward by John S. Bell. The classical dynamics of an electron orbiting a nucleus in uniform motion is solved analytically and compared to numerical simulations for an accelerated nucleus. The relativistic phenomena of length contraction and time dilation are shown to result from the electric and magnetic forces on the electron when its motion is analyzed in a single frame of reference. The relevance of these results for understanding the theory of special relativity is discussed.

2025-06-30T01:24:26Z 4 figures; supplemental included in source Am. J. Phys. 92, 434-443 (2024) Frederick W. Strauch http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01928v3 2025-06-27T04:34:03Z

According to the Kolmogorovian Censorship Hypothesis, everything that quantum theory says about the world in the language of the quantum mechanical Hilbert space formalism is actually about relationships between ordinary relative frequencies expressible in operational terms using classical Kolmogorovian probability theory. In other words, a quantum theoretical description of a system should in principle be translatable into a purely operational-probabilistic description. However, our goal in this paper is different; we do not want to deal with the problem how to translate the known theory of quantum mechanics into operational terms, or to reconstruct the theory from postulates which can be interpreted in operational terms. Our aim is somewhat broader and points in the opposite direction. We start with a general scheme for the operational description of an arbitrary physical system. The description is based solely on the notion of observable events (measurement operations and measurement results) and on general, empirically established simple laws concerning their relative frequency. These laws are so simple and fundamental that they apply equally to any physical system. In the first part of the paper, we outline the basic elements of such an operational-probabilistic theory. In the second part, we discuss how this operational-probabilistic description compares to the quantum mechanical description and to what extent the standard Hilbert space quantum mechanics can be regarded as a reformulation of the general operational-probabilistic theory.

2023-09-05T03:32:30Z 51 pages, version with 10 pages of new parts Laszlo E. Szabo Marton Gomori Zalan Gyenis http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.6940v2 2025-06-26T06:12:39Z

In this paper, we suggest an alternative interpretation for the quantum state vector, which, by considering temporal parts for physical objects, aims to give an intelligible account of measurement problem in quantum mechanics. We examine the capacity of this interpretation as for explaining three measurement problems: the problem of outcome, the problem of statistics and the problem of effect. We argue that, this interpretation of the state vector, while providing a satisfactory account, as rationally plausible as its rivals, for the measurement problem, shows yet another limitation of our perceptual experience, i.e. our inability to perceive unsharp reality.

2013-05-29T20:16:19Z 22 pages, 1 figure. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1005.0604 by other authors Alireza Mansouri Mehdi Golshani Amir Ehsan Karbasizadeh http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22497v1 2025-06-25T03:57:40Z

This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. This model empowers fields from computational science to the humanities, reframing academic knowledge as a living process rather than a static credential.

2025-06-25T03:57:40Z 66 pages, 0 figures, interdisciplinary framework, includes proposed architecture and metadata layer structures Craig Steven Wright http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18449v1 2025-06-23T09:35:31Z

In this paper I analyze the context in which Cassini 1st described lunar libration and proposed its interpretation.

2025-06-23T09:35:31Z Pasquale Tucci