https://arxiv.org/api/ADLF7Aze4+5fbh7bZYeJqlqsNgo 2026-06-14T11:57:57Z 5610 405 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00408v6 2025-07-22T21:10:15Z

We review Bohr's atomic model and its extension by Sommerfeld from a mathematical perspective of wave mechanics. The derivation of quantization rules and energy levels is revisited using semiclassical methods. Sommerfeld-type integrals are evaluated by elementary techniques, and connections with the Schrödinger and Dirac equations are established. Historical developments and key transitions from classical to quantum theory are discussed to clarify the structure and significance of the old quantum mechanics.

2025-05-31T05:55:28Z 37 pages, 8 figures, 93 references Phys Usp 69, 74-93 (2026) Kamal K. Barley Andreas Ruffing Sergei K. Suslov 10.3367/UFNe.2025.08.040014 http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18186v3 2025-07-21T00:09:39Z

I dispute the conventional claim that the second law of thermodynamics is saved from a "Maxwell's Demon" by the entropy cost of information erasure, and show that instead it is measurement that incurs the entropy cost. Thus Brillouin, who identified measurement as savior of the second law, was essentially correct, and putative refutations of his view, such as Bennett's claim to measure without entropy cost, are seen to fail when the applicable physics is taken into account. I argue that the tradition of attributing the defeat of Maxwell's Demon to erasure rather than to measurement arose from unphysical classical idealizations that do not hold for real gas molecules, as well as a physically ungrounded recasting of physical thermodynamical processes into computational and information-theoretic conceptualizations. I argue that the fundamental principle that saves the second law is the quantum uncertainty principle applying to the need to localize physical states to precise values of observables in order to effect the desired disequilibria aimed at violating the second law. I obtain the specific entropy cost for localizing a molecule in the Szilard engine and show that it coincides with the quantity attributed to Landauer's principle. I also note that an experiment characterized as upholding an entropy cost of erasure in a "quantum Maxwell's Demon" actually demonstrates an entropy cost of measurement.

2025-03-23T19:49:12Z Additional reference: Geiger and Kedem (2022) Foundations 2025, 5(2), 16 R. E. Kastner 10.3390/foundations5020016 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14714v1 2025-07-19T18:20:04Z

The dawning of the Space Age marked the start of an ongoing relationship between the professional astronomical community and both state and non-state actors that launch and operate spacecraft in near-Earth orbital space. While the Cold War heated up in the late 1950s, military uses of outer space quickly came into conflict with the priorities of astronomers then building ever-bigger ground-based telescopes and envisioning the first generation of space telescopes. As the threat of global thermonuclear war loomed, the United States carried out Project West Ford, which tested an 'artificial ionosphere' for microwave radio propagation by placing several hundred million tiny copper dipoles into a belt orbiting the Earth. While the test was ultimately successful, it ignited a firestorm of concern and criticism among astronomers and ultimately influenced the framing of the United Nations Outer Space Treaty. Here we examine the history of Project West Ford as it prompted astronomers to react, comparing it with the ongoing problem of the potential impact of large satellite constellations on astronomical research.

2025-07-19T18:20:04Z 41 pages, 4 figures J. for the Hist. of Astronomy 56 (2025) 291-331 John C. Barentine 10.1177/00218286251313772 http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05900v2 2025-07-18T14:36:46Z

An important theoretical achievement of the last century was the realization that strict renormalizability can be a powerful criterion to select Lagrangians in the framework of perturbative quantum field theory. The Standard Model Lagrangian (without gravity) is strictly renormalizable from a perturbative point of view. On the other hand, the inclusion of gravity seems not to respect this criterion, since general relativity is perturbatively non-renormalizable. The aim of this work is to provide concrete evidence that strict renormalizability is still a valid criterion even when applied to gravity. First, we show that adding quadratic curvature terms to the Einstein-Hilbert action gives rise to a strictly renormalizable theory known as quadratic gravity. Second, we argue that this unique theory represents the most conservative approach to quantum gravity and, at the same time, is highly predictive, as it can explain new physics beyond general relativity already in the sub-Planckian regime. In particular, it provides one of the best fits to the CMB anisotropies via Starobinsky inflation and makes sharp cosmological predictions that can be tested in the near future. Finally, we comment on the (super-)Planckian regime and conclude with a historical note.

2025-04-08T10:54:19Z V2: 24 pages (including title page and contents) + references, minor changes, published in JHEP JHEP 07 (2025), 175 Luca Buoninfante 10.1007/JHEP07(2025)175 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13582v1 2025-07-18T00:03:39Z

In this paper, the historical origins of quantum entanglement in particle physics are systematically and thoroughly investigated. 1957, Bohm and Aharonov noted that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlation had been experimentally realised in the 1949 experiment of Chien-Shiung Wu and Shaknov. This was the first time in history that spatially separated quantum entanglement was explicitly realised in a controlled experiment. Wheeler first proposed such an experiment as a test of quantum electrodynamics, but his calculation was in error; the correct theoretical calculations came from Ward and Price, as well as from Snyder, Pasternack and Hornbostel, and the result was in accordance with Yang's 1949 selection rule. After the publication of Bell's inequality in 1964, it was considered whether it could be tested by using the Wu-Shaknov experiment. This gave an impetus to the field, and a new experiment was done by Wu's group, though it was not successful as a test of Bell inequality violation. In 1957, Tsung-Dao Lee, Reinhard Oehme and Chen Ning Yang established the quantum mechanical description of the kaons and found that the neutral kaon is a two-state system. In 1958, based on an approach similar to Yang's 1949 selection rule, Goldhaber, Lee and Yang were the first to write down the entangled states of kaon pairs, in which a single kaon can be charged or neutral. This gave, for the first time, quantum entanglement of internal degrees of freedom of high-energy particles other than photons. In 1960, as unpublished work, Lee and Yang discussed the consequences of quantum entanglement of neutral kaon pairs. We also describe several physicists in the past, especially Ward. A Chinese version of this paper was published in early 2023.

2025-07-18T00:03:39Z 25 pages International Journal of Modern Physics A 40 (2025) 2546002 Yu Shi 10.1142/S0217732325300010 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12223v1 2025-07-16T13:30:47Z

Nick Huggett, James Ladyman, and Karim Thebault (HLT) have presented a comprehensive article examining the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation (BOA). Their central objective is to challenge our position on the matter-namely, that the BOA incorporates a classical assumption incompatible with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. In contrast, HLT contend that the BOA involves no such classical assumption and, as a result, supports the view that chemistry can be reduced to physics. The purpose of this paper is to offer a critical analysis of the HLT article and to clarify why we consider their arguments unpersuasive.

2025-07-16T13:30:47Z This is an answer to the article "On the Quantum Theory of Molecules: Rigour, Idealization, and Uncertainty" arXiv:2411.01942 Olimpia Lombardi Sebastian Fortin Juan Camilo Martinez Gonzalez Hernan Lucas Accorinti http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11598v1 2025-07-15T17:59:17Z

In the 1960s and 1970s a series of observations and theoretical developments highlighted the presence of several anomalies which could, in principle, be explained by postulating one of the following two working hypotheses: (i) the existence of dark matter, or (ii) the modification of standard gravitational dynamics in low accelerations. In the years that followed, the dark matter hypothesis as an explanation for dark matter phenomenology attracted far more attention compared to the hypothesis of modified gravity, and the latter is largely regarded today as a non-viable alternative. The present article takes an integrated history and philosophy of science approach in order to identify the reasons why the scientific community mainly pursued the dark matter hypothesis in the years that followed, as opposed to modified gravity. A plausible answer is given in terms of three epistemic criteria for the pursuitworthiness of a hypothesis: (a) its problem-solving potential, (b) its compatibility with established theories and the feasibility of incorporation, and (c) its independent testability. A further comparison between the problem of dark matter and the problem of dark energy is also presented, explaining why in the latter case the situation is different, and modified gravity is still considered a viable possibility.

2025-07-15T17:59:17Z Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 112, 141-152 (2025) Antonis Antoniou 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.006 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11568v1 2025-07-14T21:41:09Z

Humanity's unprecedented technological capacity and concurrent existential risks reveal a critical lacuna in the philosophical tradition: the absence of a systematic framework for the long-term future. This article argues that formulating such a framework is the central ethical imperative of our era. To defend this thesis, it synthesizes the normative ethics of Hans Jonas and Derek Parfit with the analytical framework of Nick Bostrom's work on existential risk and longtermism. The analysis further addresses the ontological challenge posed by posthumanism to the human 'subject' and explores the functional role of a secular cosmic purpose in motivating long-term action. The paper's main contribution is the articulation of a synthetic research agenda for a prospective philosophy, one that integrates axiology, risk management, and ontology to guide humanity through its perilous technological adolescence.

2025-07-14T21:41:09Z 14 paginas, in Spanish language. sin figuras. Articulo en español con resumen y titulo en ingles. Este ensayo interdisciplinario sintetiza el largoplacismo (longtermism), el riesgo existencial y la filosofía posthumanista para articular una agenda de investigación para una filosofía prospectiva. Dirigido tanto a audiencias académicas como al publico general Santos E. Moreta Reyes 10.48550/arXiv.2507.11568 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10529v1 2025-07-14T17:53:40Z

The Tolman effect is well-known in relativistic cosmology but rarely discussed outside it. That is surprising because the effect -- that systems extended over a varying gravitational potential exhibit temperature gradients while in thermal equilibrium -- conflicts with ordinary classical thermodynamics. In this paper we try to better understand this effect from a foundational perspective. We make five claims. First, as Tolman knew, it was Einstein who first discovered the effect, and furthermore, Einstein's derivation helps us appreciate how robust it is. Second, the standard interpretation of the effect in terms of 'local temperature' leads to the breakdown of much of classical thermodynamics. Third, one can rescue thermodynamics by using Einstein's preferred interpretation in terms of the 'wahre Temperatur' -- what we'll call global temperature -- but it too has some costs. Fourth, the effect is perhaps best understood in terms of clocks as opposed to energy loss. Fifth, inspired by a proposal of Einstein's elsewhere, we sketch an interpretation of the effect in terms of a third novel temperature, which we call the 'wahre-local temperature'. On this view, temperature -- and thermodynamics -- is defined only in relation to local clocks. In sum, we view the fragmentation of temperature in thermodynamics as a natural and expected result of the fragmentation of time in general relativity.

2025-07-14T17:53:40Z Accepted for publication in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Preprint of July 14, 2025. Please cite published version when available Eugene Y. S. Chua Craig Callender http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14734v2 2025-07-14T16:07:25Z

Inertia has long been treated as the paradigm of natural motion. This paper challenges this identification through the lens of General Relativity. Drawing on Norton (2012)'s distinction between idealisation and approximation and analysing key results from Tamir (2012) on the theorems of Geroch-Jang, Ehlers-Geroch, Einstein-Grommer, and Geroch-Traschen, I argue that geodesic motion -- commonly treated as the relativistic expression of inertia -- fails to qualify as either. Rather, geodesic motion is best understood as a useful construct -- a formal artefact of the theory's geometric structure, without real or fictitious instantiation, and excluded by the dynamical structure of General Relativity. In place of inertial motion, I develop a layered account of natural motion, which is not encoded in a single "master equation of motion." Extended, structured, and backreacting bodies require successively refined dynamical formalisms that systematically depart from geodesic motion. This pluralist framework displaces geodesic motion as the privileged expression of pure gravitational motion, replacing it with a dynamically grounded hierarchy of approximations fully consistent with the Einstein field equations. Inertial motion thus emerges not as the universal default of motion under gravity alone, but as a formal construct that stands apart from the pluralistic framework in which natural motion is genuinely realised.

2025-04-20T20:33:33Z Nicola Bamonti http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09988v1 2025-07-14T07:13:21Z

As we approach the centennial anniversary of modern quantum mechanics this paper revisits the foundational debates through a new poll within the research community. Inspired by the survey by Schlosshauer, Kofler, and Zeilinger at the specialized 2011 Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality conference, we expanded our recruitment to include a more representative sample of the broader community of physicists with the aim to reveal potential shifts in scientists' views and compare our findings with those from several previous polls. While quantum foundations still lack a consensus interpretation, our results indicate a persistent preference for the Copenhagen interpretation. This enduring support likely reflects both the educational emphasis on the Copenhagen interpretation and its pragmatic appeal in avoiding complex metaphysical questions and introducing new notions (e.g., other worlds or the pilot wave). Our findings thus underscore the relative stability of interpretational preferences over the past decades.

2025-07-14T07:13:21Z Petr O. Jedlička Šimon Kos Martin Šmíd Jiří Vomlel Jan Slavík http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10440v1 2025-07-10T13:54:37Z

Relativistic quantum mechanics can be considered to have begun with a search for wave equations corresponding to each intrinsic spin. However, relativistic quantum physics differs fundamentally from the non-relativistic wave mechanics. It requires a formalism allowing \ creation and destruction of particles. This gets proper treatment only in a framework called quantum field theory. This article is a semi-historic account of the intriguing new features which emerge as a part of quantum field theory. Such a discussion is impossible without a basic presentation of the formalism itself. Hence some mathematics is included in finer print. The article is directed mostly to those familiar with essential classical mechanics and basic quantum mechanics, though I strive to provide a flavour of the subject to the keenly interested non-physics reader.

2025-07-10T13:54:37Z 21 pages 4 illustrative figures. To appear in Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Volume 105 pp 43-62 (2025) Urjit A. Yajnik 10.1007/s41745-025-00478-4 http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06095v2 2025-07-10T07:38:20Z

The scientific status of physical cosmology has been the subject of philosophical debate ever since detailed mathematical models of the Universe emerged from Einstein's general theory of relativity. Such debates have revolved around whether and to what extent cosmology meets established demarcation criteria for a discipline to be scientific, as well as determining how to best characterize cosmology as a science, given the unique challenges and limitations faced by a discipline which aims to study the origin, composition, and fate of the Universe itself. The present article revisits, in light of the dramatic progress in cosmology in recent decades, an earlier debate held in the 1950s between Herman Bondi and Gerald Whitrow regarding the scientific status of cosmology. We analyse cosmology's transition from an emerging science to a cornerstone of modern physics, highlighting its empirical successes in establishing the $Λ$-Cold Dark Matter ($Λ$CDM) model and in its delivery of various successful novel predictions. Despite this remarkable scientific success and progress, we argue that modern cosmology faces a further profound challenge: the permanent underdetermination of the microphysical nature of its exotic energy components: inflation, dark matter, and dark energy. Drawing historical parallels with the role of spectroscopy in revealing the microphysical nature of atomic physics, we argue that the epistemic barriers obstructing us from ascertaining the microphysical nature of these exotic energy components are significant, in turn casting doubt upon whether cosmology can ever transcend these particular epistemic challenges. We conclude by reflecting on the prospects for future breakthroughs and/or non-empirical arguments which could decide this issue conclusively.

2025-01-10T16:45:43Z Accepted version to appear in Philosophy of Physics Philosophy of Physics 3 (2025) 1, 11 Pedro G. Ferreira William J. Wolf James Read 10.31389/pop.218 http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01993v5 2025-07-09T11:35:47Z

In the 19th century Mossotti and Clausius developed an expression linking the electrical permittivity of a dielectric to the product of molecular polarizability and number density. Lorenz and Lorentz later extended this framework to encompass the refractive index of the dielectric. These classical expressions have proven remarkably successful in describing how permittivity and refractive index vary with number density, under the assumption that molecular polarizability remains relatively constant. While these models have stood the test of time and continue to offer valuable insights, their derivation relies on an approximation of the local electric field within a spherical cavity that simulates the molecular environment, excluding the field generated by the molecule or molecules themselves. For regimes of higher number densities, such as those encountered in densified dielectrics, employing an exact solution for the local field becomes increasingly important. This refinement extends the applicability of the Clausius-Mossotti and Lorentz-Lorenz equations and leads to more accurate estimates of molecular polarizability in general.

2025-05-18T23:47:20Z Jeroen van Duivenbode Anne-Jans Faber Reinoud Lavrijsen http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07069v1 2025-07-08T08:16:45Z

We establish that de Broglie's wave, as it is introduced in his Thesis, is not a wave on a given space, but on the contrary itself determines a system in which Special Relativity is locally valid. This local system is a physical object, that defines its own units of length and time. C-equivalence provides a natural framework both for its mathematical description and its physical interpretation.

2025-07-08T08:16:45Z in French language Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 2020, 45 (1), pp.99-111 Satyanad Kichenassamy LMR