https://arxiv.org/api/9oyPzWOyN2FbSA//6/5fRsM/EFA 2026-06-14T06:40:36Z 5610 330 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09480v3 2025-10-03T13:52:54Z

We present a critical analysis of the classical approaches to energy subjects, based on the work-energy theorem and the conservation of mechanical energy proposed in the courses of the first years of tertiary education. We show how these approaches present a series of inconsistencies and errors that are a source of conceptual difficulties among students. We then analyze a modern treatment of mechanical courses based on the results of research in physics education over the last 40 years. We place special emphasis on the principle of conservation of energy as one of the fundamental principles of nature, prioritizing the concepts of system, surrounding, and energy transfer and transformation.

2020-07-18T17:20:36Z Avances en Enseñnza de la Física, vol 2, 2020 Alvaro Suarez Daniel Baccino Arturo C. Marti Martin Monteiro http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00675v2 2025-10-03T11:00:29Z

Inspired by the Turing test, we present a novel methodological framework to assess the extent to which a population of machines mirrors the philosophical views of a population of humans. The framework consists of three steps: (i) instructing machines to impersonate each human in the population, reflecting their backgrounds and beliefs, (ii) administering a questionnaire covering various philosophical positions to both humans and machines, and (iii) statistically analyzing the resulting responses. We apply this methodology to the debate on scientific realism, a long-standing philosophical inquiry exploring the relationship between science and reality. By considering the outcome of a survey of over 500 human participants, including both physicists and philosophers of science, we generate their machine personas using an artificial intelligence engine based on a large language model. We reveal that the philosophical views of a population of machines are, on average, similar to those endorsed by a population of humans, irrespective of whether they are physicists or philosophers of science. As compared to humans, however, machines exhibit a weaker inclination toward scientific realism and a stronger coherence in their philosophical positions. Given the observed similarities between the populations of humans and machines, this methodological framework may offer unprecedented opportunities for advancing research in the empirical social sciences by complementing human participants with their machine-impersonated counterparts.

2025-07-01T11:16:10Z Michele Pizzochero Giorgia Dellaferrera http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09338v4 2025-10-02T08:04:25Z

This work introduces a novel three-fold classification of reference frames in General Relativity, distinguishing between Idealised Reference Frames (IRFs), Dynamical Reference Frames (DRFs), and Real Reference Frames (RRFs). By defining a reference frame as a set of degrees of freedom instantiated by a physical system, the work contrasts this notion with that of coordinate systems-purely mathematical idealisations lacking physical instantiation. This classification addresses two longstanding challenges in GR: (P1) the difficulty of defining local and gauge-invariant observables, and (P2) how to interpret diffeomorphism gauge freedom in physical terms rather than as merely a mathematical redundancy. Overall, this work clarifies the conceptual foundations in classical General Relativity, enhancing our understanding of gauge-symmetries, observers and laying the groundwork for future investigations in both classical and quantum gravitational contexts.

2023-07-18T15:20:26Z Nicola Bamonti http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26450v1 2025-09-30T16:06:05Z

This paper answers examines the relationship between Diffeomorphism Invariance and Background Independence. First, a review of the relationship between Background Independence, General Relativity (GR) and pre-GR theories are given. Then, a wide range of other conceptions of background independence is discussed. It is shown that the definition of Background Independence is fluid and can mean different things to different philosophers and/or physicists. Most pertinently, the paper addresses the question of what kind of background independence is implied by a mathematical criterion of diffeomorphism invariance or in what sense is diffeomorphism invariance background independence. Lastly, the concept of haecceity in relation to diffeomorphism invariance is discussed.

2025-09-30T16:06:05Z Kurniawan Tjandra Kuldip Singh http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26389v1 2025-09-30T15:24:22Z

This paper examines Lorentz's 1895 derivations of the classical Doppler formula and Fresnel drag, Einstein's 1905 derivation of the relativistic Doppler effect and aberration, and Einstein's 1907 kinematical route to the exact velocity composition law from which Fresnel drag is obtained as a low-velocity limit. Einstein acknowledged that he had read Lorentz's "Versuch" well before 1905. In 1907, Einstein identified Lorentz's "Versuch" as a crucial precursor to relativity. In that work, Lorentz had already invoked local time to derive Fresnel's drag coefficient from Maxwell's equations. There is a genuine "family resemblance" between Lorentz's and Einstein's treatments in that both preserve the phase of a plane wave under transformation. Yet I demonstrate that this resemblance is only formal. I also discuss the absence of the relativistic Doppler and aberration laws in Poincaré's Dynamics of the Electron.

2025-09-30T15:24:22Z Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10602v2 2025-09-30T13:22:19Z

I propose that qualia are physical because they are directly observable, and revisit the contentious link between consciousness and quantum measurements from a new perspective -- one that does not rely on observers or wave function collapse but instead treats physical measurements as fundamental in a sense resonant with Wheeler's it-from-bit. Building on a mathematical definition of measurement space in physics, I reinterpret it as a model of qualia, effectively equating the measurement problem of quantum mechanics with the hard problem of consciousness. The resulting framework falls within panpsychism, and offers potential solutions to the combination problem. Moreover, some of the mathematical structure of measurement spaces, taken for granted in physics, needs justification for qualia, suggesting that the apparent solidity of physical reality is deeply rooted in how humans process information.

2022-03-20T17:21:57Z V2 is a thorough revision of V1 Pedro Resende http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23047v1 2025-09-27T01:52:48Z

Bell's theorem demonstrates that any physical theory that is consistent with the predictions of quantum mechanics, and which satisfies some apparently innocuous assumptions, must violate the principle of local causality. It may therefore be possible to maintain local causality by rejecting one of these other assumptions instead. One possibility that has recently received significant attention involves rejecting the principle of statistical independence (SI). In this paper, we consider the frequency interpretation of SI, which states that $ρ(λ) \approx ρ(λ| Z)$, where $ρ(λ)$ is the relative frequency of an element of an ensemble being in the state $λ$, and $Z$ is a label that separates the ensemble into apparently randomly selected sub-ensembles. SI is violated when the sub-ensemble frequency $ρ(λ| Z)$ fails to be representative of the ensemble frequency $ρ(λ)$. We argue that physical theories that systematically violate SI should all be understood as superdeterministic. This perspective on SI sheds light on a number of issues that are being debated in the superdeterminism literature, especially concerning its scope and philosophical consequences. Regarding scope, we argue that superdeterministic theories fall into three categories, deterministic theories with fine-tuned initial conditions, fluke theories, and nomic exclusion theories. We also argue that retrocausal and invariant set theories need not violate SI, which is contrary to how they are normally presented. Regarding philosophical implications, we argue that superdeterminism is incompatible with free will according to some prominent compatibilist accounts. We also argue that although superdeterminism is conspiratorial, it is not unscientific, but pre-scientific.

2025-09-27T01:52:48Z Forthcoming in The European Journal for Philosophy of Science Mordecai Waegell Kelvin J. McQueen http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22528v1 2025-09-26T16:06:44Z

Recently, a novel intuitionistic reconstruction of the foundations of physics has been primarily developed by Nicolas Gisin and Flavio Del Santo drawing on naturalism. Our goal in this paper is to examine and develop the philosophical background of their naturalistic intuitionism for physics in contrast with Brouwer's defense of his intuitionistic mathematics. To be exact, we propose a systematic rearticulation of Brouwer's so-called two acts of intuitionism to serve as the self-contained philosophical framework justifying naturalistic intuitionism in physics. This revision is accompanied by an investigation of the distinctive naturalistic treatment of some central intuitionistic topics, including logic, language, time, ontology, meaning, and truth.

2025-09-26T16:06:44Z 10 pages Bruno Bentzen Flavio Del Santo Nicolas Gisin http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21515v1 2025-09-25T20:06:45Z

In his The Road to Reality as well as in his Fashion, Faith and Fantasy, Roger Penrose criticises string theory and its practitioners from a variety of angles ranging from conceptual, technical, and methodological objections to sociological observations about the string theoretic scientific community. In this article, we assess Penrose's conceptual/technical objections to string theory, focussing in particular upon those which invoke the notion of `functional freedom'. In general, we do not find these arguments to be successful.

2025-09-25T20:06:45Z 35 pages Philosophy of Physics 2(1), 2024 Matěj Krátký James Read http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19407v1 2025-09-23T12:51:55Z

The Aharonov-Bohm (A-B) effect has been a major focus of the foundations of physics. And yet, much confusion persists. In particular, the effect purportedly leads to a dilemma: on one horn, we have a non-local action of a gauge-invariant quantity on charged particles; on the other, we get a local action on these particles, but of a non-gauge invariant quantity. This is the folklore, but the folklore is filled with misconceptions. Here, by deploying a recently defended formulation of gauge theory that dispenses with principal bundles, gauge potentials, and explicit gauge symmetries, I argue, with previous authors, that the A-B effect can be understood gauge-independently. But here my argument will go further: I will show that the A-B effect, when expressed in terms of the covariant derivative of a vector bundle, is \emph{entirely} analogous to the holonomy of spacetime vectors, and can be understood completely locally. The only surprising idea illustrated by the A-B effect is that, in some circumstances, there is more to the covariant derivative than can be accounted for by the curvature and underlying topology of a vector bundle.

2025-09-23T12:51:55Z 32 pages. 7-page appendix, 3 figures Henrique Gomes http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16403v1 2025-09-19T20:24:35Z

In previous study [1], we proposed a new physical law applicable to both particle and thermodynamical systems. Additionally, we introduced a physical definition of chaos and self-organization. In the present work, we extend this novel interaction scheme to various thermodynamical systems in order to test the universality of the proposed law. Our results demonstrate that the dynamics of these systems also exhibit chaotic behavior under different conditions. We discussed the relationship between chaotic dynamics and the least action, and for the first time, we proposed the "Chaotic Action Principle" (CAP). Furthermore, we examined the validity of the physical and philosophical foundations of this new law and the associated definition of chaos. Finally, based on CAP, we proposed a new conceptual definition of complexity.

2025-09-19T20:24:35Z Published in Annals of Physics E. Aydiner 10.1016/j.aop.2025.170079 http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14720v1 2025-09-18T08:09:48Z

This thesis addresses two major problems in the philosophy of physics. The first is how to identify the minimal physical content of a theory; that is, what features of a theory are truly needed to make predictions, and what can be removed without changing its empirical consequences. The second is the problem of time's arrow: why time seems to have a direction, even though the fundamental laws of physics treat the past and future symmetrically. I show that answering the first question leads to insights about the second. In particular, I argue that the overall size of the Universe is not used to make predictions in cosmology, and so should not count as part of the theory's minimal physical content. Describing the Universe without this feature leads to a striking result: the arrow of time becomes a local phenomenon. Observers like us who see a Universe full of matter clumped together to form structures like stars and planets are statistically much more likely to see increasing clumpiness into the future than into the past. This tendency helps explain our experience of time's direction.

2025-09-18T08:09:48Z PhD Thesis, University of Groningen. Defended 11 Sept 2025 Sean Gryb 10.33612/diss.1384838034 http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14288v1 2025-09-16T21:21:59Z

James Burkett Hartle was a theoretical physicist who made major contributions to our understanding of relativistic stars, black holes, and cosmology. Most of his career, however, was devoted to studying the universe as a quantum system. As a result, he was known as the father of quantum cosmology. He is best known for two seminal papers with Stephen Hawking that introduced two quantum states of fundamental importance: the "Hartle-Hawking vacuum" for matter fields outside a black hole, and the "no-boundary wave function of the universe" for cosmology. Jim (as everyone called him) was a warm and caring person who was genuinely concerned with the success of his students, postdocs, and colleagues. He was generous with his time and helped to foster a culture of a welcoming family among gravitational physicists.

2025-09-16T21:21:59Z This memoir is published in the Biographical Memoir Series of the US National Academy of Sciences. 8 pages Gary T. Horowitz Kip S. Thorne http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11886v1 2025-09-15T13:02:44Z

Understanding the formation and evolution of stellar-mass binary black holes (BBHs) requires a thorough investigation of the key physical processes involved. While one pathway involves the isolated evolution of massive binary stars, affected by uncertain stages like core-collapse supernovae and common envelope evolution, an alternative channel is dynamical formation in dense stellar environments. Newtonian gravity has traditionally provided a robust and computationally efficient framework for modeling large-scale gravitational interactions. However, accurately capturing close encounters and black hole mergers necessitates the use of general relativity. This work focuses on assessing the applicability of post-Newtonian gravity in bridging these regimes, offering a physically insightful and computationally tractable approach to modeling BBH formation in the gravitational-wave era of astronomy.

2025-09-15T13:02:44Z 14 pages. This article is part of the theme issue "Newton, Principia, Newton Geneva Edition (17th-19th) and modern Newtonian mechanics: heritage, past, and present" M. Paola Vaccaro 10.1098/rsta.2023.0294 http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00227v8 2025-09-15T11:20:40Z

I revisit the reply of Bohr to Einstein. Bohr's assertion that there are no causes in atomic scale systems is, as a closer analysis reveals, not in line with the Copenhagen interpretation since it would contain a statement about reality. What Bohr should have written is that there are no causes in mathematics, which is universally acknowledged. The law of causality requires physical effects to be due to physical causes. For this reason any theoretical model which replaces physical causes by mathematical objects is creationism, that is, it creates physical objects out of mathematical elements. I show that this is the case for most of quantum mechanics.

2018-02-01T10:21:51Z 8 pages, no in-depth knowledge of mathematics required, sets out the case for a major revision of theoretical physics. This revision expands the case against Bohm and the analysis whether quantum mechanics actually meets Popper's requirement for a scientific theory (it does not, since it is not falsifiable) and corrects a few typos Werner A Hofer