https://arxiv.org/api/4lXEvjRD1Td6zWcyb3s+4LN+0EA 2026-06-14T05:34:32Z 5610 315 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13247v1 Agency cannot be a purely quantum phenomenon 2025-10-15T07:50:13Z What are the physical requirements for agency? We investigate whether a purely quantum system (one evolving unitarily in a coherent regime without decoherence or collapse) can satisfy three minimal conditions for agency: an agent must be able to create a world-model, use it to evaluate the likely consequences of alternative actions, and reliably perform the action that maximizes expected utility. We show that the first two conditions conflict with the no-cloning theorem, which forbids copying unknown quantum states: world-model construction requires copying information from the environment, and deliberation requires copying the world-model to assess multiple actions. Approximate cloning strategies do not permit sufficient fidelity or generality for agency to be viable in purely quantum systems. The third agency condition also fails due to the linearity of quantum dynamics. These results imply four key consequences. First, agency requires significant classical resources, placing clear constraints on its physical basis. Second, they provide insight into how classical agents emerge within a quantum universe. Third, they show that quantum computers cannot straightforwardly simulate agential behavior without significant classical components. Finally, they challenge quantum theories of agency, free will, and consciousness. 2025-10-15T07:50:13Z 26 pages, 2 figures Emily C. Adlam Kelvin J. McQueen Mordecai Waegell http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13125v1 On Physical Mathematics: an approach through Gilles Châtelet's philosophy 2025-10-15T03:57:22Z Starting from Greg Moore's description about Physical Mathematics, a framework is proposed in order to understand it, based on Gilles Châtelet's philosophy. It will be argued that Châtelet's ideas of inverting, splitting, augmenting and virtuality are crucial in the discussion about the nature of Physical Mathematics. Along this line, it will be proposed that mirror symmetry is a natural study case to test Châtelet's ideas in this context. This should be considered as a first step in a long term project aiming to study the relations among mathematics, physics and philosophy in the construction of a global understanding of the structure of the universe, as it was envisioned by Grothendieck in the late 80's of the last century and it was started to be developed independently by Châtelet in the beginning of the 90's. The main suggestion of the essay is that it is in the relations between mathematics, physics and philosophy that new knowledge arises. 2025-10-15T03:57:22Z This is a non-technical essay looking for philosophical foundations for the so-called Physical Mathematics. Comments are very welcome John Alexander Cruz Morales http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11544v1 French on London and Bauer, and QBism 2025-10-13T15:42:08Z In this article I compare two interpretations of quantum mechanics (QM) that draw inspiration from phenomenology: the London-Bauer-French interpretation (hereafter LBF) as articulated by Steven French, and QBism. I give special attention to certain disagreements between QBism and LBF identified French's work, as well as French's related claims that QBism may be at odds with key ideas in phenomenology. My main finding is that QBism does not fare so badly with phenomenology as French makes out; in particular it can be made compatible with Zahavi's correlationism and Husserl's notion of intersubjectivity, both of which strongly inform LBF. Nevertheless, I concur with French's argument that QBism is incompatible with the conception of quantum measurement in LBF, hence also with that of Merleau-Ponty, as the latter based his own analysis on that of London and Bauer. I explain why I find QBism's account preferable in this case. 2025-10-13T15:42:08Z 23 pages excluding references. To appear in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Special Issue on The London-Bauer-French Interpretation Jacques L. Pienaar http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05504v1 Contemporary Perspectivism as a Framework of Scientific Inquiry in Quantum Mechanics and Beyond 2025-10-13T11:17:13Z Contemporary perspectivism is viewed as a framework of scientific inquiry concerning the origin, generation and systematization of scientific knowledge of nature by focusing on the conditions under which such knowledge may arise in perspectivist terms and investigating the essential ramifications of these conditions. To this end, we develop the conceptual, methodological and semantic framework of contemporary perspectivism according to the norms of the proposed endo-theoretic approach. Implementation of the preceding three-fold scheme in quantum mechanics implies that the global structure of a quantum algebra of events can be consistently comprehended through a multilevel structure of locally variable Boolean perspectives, interconnected in a category-theoretic environment, yielding jointly all the information encoded in the former. In this respect, the proposed approach validates the perspectivist/contextual nature of quantum mechanics at a fundamental level of discourse. Furthermore, due to its general character, it may acquire the form of a theoretical pattern of scientific inquiry in the natural sciences, especially when dealing with complex trans-perspectival phenomena, the analysis of which requires the use of information resulting from more than one perspective. Finally, in the appendix, we provide a concise comparative assessment between our perspectivist framework of quantum theory and Rovelli's relational interpretation of quantum mechanics. 2025-10-13T11:17:13Z 36 pages, 2 figures Foundations of Physics, 2025, 55:76 Vassilios Karakostas Elias Zafiris 10.1007/s10701-025-00888-5 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02825v3 Prigogine's temporalization of physics: two agnostic attitudes of physicists 2025-10-11T05:04:18Z In this paper, I aim to clarify the unconscious ideologies and attitudes held by physicists through Prigogine's work. Prigogine was an outstanding chemist and physicist who made significant contributions to the development of non-equilibrium thermodynamics. At the same time, he extended his ideas beyond physics into the humanities, engaging in an interdisciplinary exploration of scientific and philosophical thought. Due to his unique career, Prigogine's reception has been deeply divided. This study highlights his intellectual endeavors to formulate two distinct agnostic attitudes -- one held by dynamicists and the other by Prigogine himself. Building on this formulation, I examine how physics has been spatialized, drawing on the philosophy of Bergson. Finally, I explore an alternative path that Prigogine might have envisioned -- the temporalization of physics -- in a broader context to extend and revitalize his philosophy. 2025-02-05T02:06:49Z 30 pages, 4 figures Ann. Japan Assoc. Philos. Sci., 34, 5-34 (2025) Hirokazu Maruoka 10.4288/jafpos.34.0_5 http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09069v1 Two Types of Natural Kind Discovery: Nobel Meets Kuhn 2025-10-10T07:15:41Z Philosophers have spilled much ink over the discovery of ideas in the classical 'context of discovery'. However, there has been little engagement with the question of what constitutes a discovery of 'things in the world'. A much-overlooked answer to this question is provided by T.S. Kuhn. In this paper, I show that discoveries awarded with a Nobel Prize in Physics in the past 53 years accord with a basic premise of Kuhn's account and his distinction between two types of natural kind discoveries. I also draw normative conclusions for credit attribution in science. 2025-10-10T07:15:41Z forthcoming in Philosophy of Science Philos. sci. 93 (2026) 334-352 Samuel Schindler 10.1017/psa.2025.10181 http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11582v1 On Bayesian inference considerations and other issues concerning Drake's equation of Astrosociobiology 2025-10-08T18:56:26Z Speculation about the existence of advanced forms of life in the Universe and in our galaxy, has been since ever a subject of fascination and discussion in fiction, as well as in astrophysics, biology and philosophy. The well-known Fermi's 1950s challenge, "Where are the aliens?" has acquired more substance with the realisation of the potentialities of radioastronomy, which led to the paradigmatic Drake's equation. The emergence of astrobiology, together with the discovery up to now of more than seven thousand exoplanets, has brought increasing support to the discussion about putative life cradles. However, after more than six decades, the only quantitative tool available to estimate how widespread is life and, in particular, advanced forms of life, is, besides direct searches, which so far provided no evidence, still Drake's equation. In the present work we review the current knowledge about this equation and present new arguments of multiple origin in order to evaluate one of its most critical terms, namely the one associated to the time span that a technological civilisation must search for detectable signs of the existence and for how long a search must be extended to bear fruits. We propose that this term should be replaced by a more specific one which involves critical parameters in the enterprise of gathering information, such as energy expenditure, searching area and entropy generation. These terms can be regarded as the capability that any cosmic civilisation must show in order to face the challenge of going beyond the climate and other crises that its development inevitably ensues. Our considerations suggest that a typical time span is about a couple of decades, meaning that a successful and systematic searching programme around about hundred stars might take around a few thousand years. 2025-10-08T18:56:26Z 15 pages Orfeu Bertolami http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19833v1 Fresnel's Mechanical Legacy Recovered: How Bubble Acoustics Unifies Partial Drag, Velocity Addition, and Atomic Polarization 2025-10-08T12:25:18Z Sound waves in bubbly water and light in special relativity obey identical first-order transport laws. This equivalence is not approximate or analogical but mathematically identical to first order in $U/v$, sharing the same form discovered by Fresnel in 1818 for light in moving transparent media. We demonstrate that all three systems-bubble acoustics, optical drag, and relativistic velocity addition-are described by a universal partial entrainment equation where wave coupling to compliant components determines the drag coefficient. In bubbly liquids this physics is directly observable: waves couple to compressible bubbles rather than rigid liquid. Since bubble dynamics reproduces the relativistic result, velocity addition itself admits mechanical interpretation. Von Laue's 1907 derivation abstracted mechanics into kinematics; we reverse this, showing relativistic effects preserve mechanical content in abstract form. Beyond first-order equivalence, we show Fresnel's dispersive term encodes group velocity (energy transport) versus phase velocity (wave-crest motion)-a distinction mechanical models naturally capture but pure kinematic velocity addition cannot address. The rigidity-based interpretation of dispersion, established in acoustic metamaterials, provides cross-domain insights for materials design and suggests testable predictions linking acoustic compliance to optical drag. This three-way equivalence reduces independent phenomena to a single principle: waves riding compliant inclusions. Fresnel drag, Lorentz contraction, and atomic polarization all emerge as aspects of this one mechanism, traced through the historical density-versus-rigidity fork that shaped aether theory's trajectory. The compliant-inclusion principle shows striking quantitative agreement with isotope mass-dependence and resonance structure in existing spectroscopic data. 2025-10-08T12:25:18Z 15 pages, no figures. Cross-domain analysis connecting acoustic and optical wave propagation through compliant media Shiva Meucci http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10499v2 Gravitational redshift revisited: inertia, geometry, and charge 2025-10-07T17:07:20Z Gravitational redshift effects undoubtedly exist; moreover, the experimental setups which confirm the existence of these effects-the most famous of which being the Pound-Rebka experiment-are well-known. Nonetheless-and perhaps surprisingly-there remains a great deal of confusion in the literature regarding what these experiments establish. Our goal in the present article is to clarify these issues, in three concrete ways. First, although (i) Brown and Read (2016) are correct to point out that, given their sensitivity, the outcomes of experimental setups such as the original Pound-Rebka configuration can be accounted for using solely the machinery of accelerating frames in special relativity (barring some subtleties due to the Rindler spacetime necessary to model the effects rigorously), nevertheless (ii) an explanation of the results of more sensitive gravitational redshift outcomes does in fact require more. Second, although typically this 'more' is understood as the invocation of spacetime curvature within the framework of general relativity, in light of the so-called 'geometric trinity' of gravitational theories, in fact curvature is not necessary to explain even these results. Thus (a) one can often explain the results of these experiments using only the resources of special relativity, and (b) even when one cannot, one need not invoke spacetime curvature. And third: while one might think that the absence of gravitational redshift effects would imply that spacetime is flat, this can be called into question given the possibility of the cancelling of gravitational redshift effects by charge in the context of the Reissner-Nordström metric. This argument is shown to be valid and both attractive forces as well as redshift effects can be effectively shielded in the charged setting. Thus, it is not the case that the absence of gravitational effects implies a Minkowskian spacetime setting. 2023-09-19T10:20:50Z Published version, 14 pages, 5 figures Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 108 (2024) 19-27 Johannes Fankhauser James Read 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.09.001 http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05195v1 Inspiring stories from women in astronomy in Africa 2025-10-06T16:02:13Z In preparation for the International Astronomical Union (IAU) General Assembly (GA) 2024, the first GA held in Africa, the African Network of Women in Astronomy (AfNWA) embarked on a visionary project: the creation of an inspiring storytelling book that showcases the remarkable journeys of professional female astronomers in Africa. This book is not merely a collection of biographies; it is a tapestry of resilience, passion, and scientific excellence woven through the lives of women who have ventured into the cosmos from the African continent. The primary aim of this book is twofold. Firstly, it seeks to bring greater visibility to women astronomers in Africa, highlighting their groundbreaking research and the personal stories that have shaped their careers. By shining a light on their achievements and awards, we hope to acknowledge their contributions to the field of astronomy and underscore the importance of diversity in science. Secondly, this book aspires to inspire and empower the next generation of scientists, particularly young women and girls across Africa. Through the personal narratives and professional achievements of these trailblazing astronomers and students in astronomy, we aim to spark curiosity, foster a love for science, and demonstrate that the sky is not the limit but just the beginning for those who dare to dream. As you delve into the stories within these pages, you will encounter a rich array of experiences and insights that reflect the unique challenges and triumphs women face in astronomy. From overcoming societal barriers to making groundbreaking discoveries, these women have carved paths that others can follow, proving that with determination and passion, the stars are within reach for everyone. 2025-10-06T16:02:13Z Priscilla Muheki Mirjana Pović Somaya Saad Salma Sylla Mbaye in collaboration with Vanessa McBride Naomi Asabre Frimpong Meryem Guennoun African Science Stars team http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04962v1 Two Wrongs Make One Right 2025-10-06T15:57:55Z An influential argument for scientific realism posits that, if scientific theories were not true, their empirical success would be a coincidence. Here, I show that the false Drude's theory succeeds in explaining the Wiedemann-Franz law by coincidence--a fortuitous compensation of errors. 2025-10-06T15:57:55Z Michele Pizzochero http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18535v3 About testing Bell locality at colliders 2025-10-06T10:13:23Z High-energy colliders enable the testing of quantum mechanics at its most fundamental level, in the presence of strong and electroweak interactions, with systems that consist of qubits (fermions) and qutrits (massive spin-1 bosons). Quantum state tomography at colliders enables the witnessing of entanglement and Bell non-locality, two defining characteristics of quantum mechanics. We offer a comprehensive explanation of the underlying principles and the methods employed to achieve this remarkable feat. 2025-03-24T10:42:29Z M. Fabbrichesi R. Floreanini L. Marzola http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03793v1 Comment on "Comment on Galina Weinstein's article entitled 'Convergences and Divergences: Einstein Poincaré and Special Relativity' " 2025-10-04T12:05:16Z This paper provides a systematic response to the criticisms raised by Jean-Marc Ginoux in response to my review of his book on the history of relativity. Whereas my review was written in a strictly academic manner, Ginoux's commentary intermingles mathematical objections with ad hominem insinuations about both Einstein and me. The purpose of this reply is twofold: first, to clarify the historiographical and conceptual issues at stake in the interpretation of Einstein's 1905 paper and Poincaré's contributions of 1905--1906; and second, to demonstrate why the conflation of algebraic form with conceptual content leads to distorted conclusions. 2025-10-04T12:05:16Z Comment on arXiv:2509.22726v1 Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03378v1 A century of the Bose-Einstein condensation concept and half a century of the JINR experiments for observation of condensate in the superfluid 4He (He II) 2025-10-03T14:39:25Z This short review is devoted to celebration of two major events in quantum physics. The first one is the birth of the concept of Bose-Einstein condensation (1925) and the second is the experimental proof that it does exist and appears in the liquid 4He simultaneously with superfluidity below the $λ$-point (1975). The both of these events are tightly related to the Bogoliubov theory of superfluidity (1947). The existence of condensate in the system of interacting bosons is the key ansatz of this theory. Therefore, the experiments started in JINR in 1975 confirmed this prediction of the Bogoliubov theory that superfluidity of the liquid 4He (He II) should emerge at the same time as the Bose-Einstein condensation. 2025-10-03T14:39:25Z Valentin Zagrebnov I2M http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03041v1 An account of the arrow of time when scale is surplus 2025-10-03T14:22:15Z Existing accounts of the cosmological arrow of time face a dilemma: generalist approaches that posit time-asymmetric laws lack independent motivation, while particularist approaches that invoke a Past Hypothesis face serious conceptual and explanatory problems. We propose a novel account that dispenses with the need for both time-asymmetric laws and a Past Hypothesis. Instead, it is centred around a symmetry argument that reveals attractors and so-called 'Janus points'. The main idea is that the global spatial scale of the Universe is not empirically accessible, and should therefore be treated as surplus structure. By contrast, the Hubble parameter, which encodes the relative rate of change of scale, is empirically accessible. Once the scale redundancy is eliminated, the empirically meaningful description of cosmic dynamics involves a drag-like variable that transforms in a way that preserves time-reversal invariance. The resulting space of dynamical possibilities possesses universal attractors and Janus points, giving rise to particular states in which observers experience a cosmological arrow of time akin to our own. We illustrate the proposal by applying it to cosmological and gravitational N-body models, showing how it accounts, respectively, for the rapid cooling of the early universe and its relative smoothness. 2025-10-03T14:22:15Z 34 pages, 1 figure Sean Gryb Simon Friederich