https://arxiv.org/api/ktt+hfyxJvdi20AJr7CAQOse/wc 2026-06-14T04:33:27Z 5610 300 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05668v2 2025-10-28T20:57:18Z

This paper concerns the question of which collections of general relativistic spacetimes are deterministic relative to which definitions. We begin by considering a series of three definitions of increasing strength due to Belot (1995). The strongest of these definitions is particularly interesting for spacetime theories because it involves an asymmetry condition called ``rigidity'' that has been studied previously in a different context (Geroch 1969; Halvorson and Manchak 2022; Dewar 2024). We go on to explore other (stronger) asymmetry conditions that give rise to other (stronger) forms of determinism. We introduce a number of definitions of this type and clarify the relationships between them and the three considered by Belot. We go on to show that there are collections of general relativistic spacetimes that satisfy much stronger forms of determinism than previously known. We also highlight a number of open questions.

2025-03-07T18:29:02Z 21 pages, 2 figures JB Manchak Thomas Barrett Hans Halvorson James Owen Weatherall http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24296v1 2025-10-28T10:59:24Z

Scientific cosmology has now reached its period of maturity with the establishment of a standard model, which is the theory of an expanding universe. The question of whether this expansion resolves itself, in the past, into a singularity identifiable with an absolute beginning, or whether the universe in which we are is only one of the multiple possible universes existing either in space or in time, is still under debate. Moreover, the assimilation of the beginning of the universe to a "creation" has often been contested by theology, which, since Thomas Aquinas, if not since the Fathers of the Church, tends to carefully distinguish the two. In the following article, after briefly summarizing some points in the recent history of scientific cosmology, we will attempt to present in broad outline the standard model that scientists have arrived at. Then, we will undertake to study some of the problems it raises as well as the alternative theories that can be opposed to it. Finally, we will discuss the problematic links that scientific cosmology continues to maintain with philosophy and theology, notably the thorny question of creation from nothing ({\it creatio ex nihilo}).

2025-10-28T10:59:24Z 47 pages, 6 figurees Daniel Parrochia http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24054v1 2025-10-28T04:26:19Z

We introduce a framework uniting algorithmic randomness with exchangeable credences to address foundational questions in philosophy of probability and philosophy of science. To demonstrate its power, we show how one might use the framework to derive the Principal Principle -- the norm that rational credence should match known objective chance -- without circularity. The derivation brings together de Finetti's exchangeability, Martin-Löf randomness, Lewis's and Skyrms's chance-credence norms, and statistical constraining laws (arXiv:2303.01411). Laws that constrain histories to algorithmically random sequences naturally pair with exchangeable credences encoding inductive symmetries. Using the de Finetti representation theorem, we show that this pairing directly entails the Principal Principle of this framework. We extend the proof to partial exchangeability and provide finite-history bounds that vanish in the infinite limit. The Principal Principle thus emerges as a mathematical consequence of the alignment between nomological constraints and inductive learning. This reveals how algorithmic randomness and exchangeability can illuminate foundational questions about chance, frequency, and rational belief.

2025-10-28T04:26:19Z Jeffrey A. Barrett Eddy Keming Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22666v1 2025-10-26T13:05:13Z

The objective of this pre-scientific paper is to analyze the crisis management during the Fukushima nuclear accident in the year of 2011 and to derive lessons for a safer operation of reactors along with a more resilient crisis management framework. In addition to official reports and subject literature, the conducted methods included interviews with an IAEA safeguard and a political scientist. The central findings were that the accident pointed out deficiencies regarding the independence of the regulatory body and that mismanagement of the available technical resources in conjunction with insufficient communication led to evitable evacuations.

2025-10-26T13:05:13Z in German language Elias Koschier http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21015v1 2025-10-23T21:45:40Z

Quantum theory implies, and empirical evidence confirms, that while particles $\textit{can}$ exhibit wave-like behavior in interferometric experiments, this behavior is so limited as $\textit{not}$ to allow for third- and higher-order interference. The article at hand shows that this possibility-impossibility structure suggests the universal validity of a principle that regulates statistical correlations between spatiotemporally localized events, $\textit{independently}$ of the nature of the objects that may or may not partake in these events. Roughly, the said principle mandates that $\textit{any}$ joint influence of $m$ mutually spacelike separated events on $\textit{another}$ event, be such, that it can be separated by $\textit{at least}$ $\lceil \frac{m}{2} \rceil$ mediating events, and in some cases, by $\textit{no more}$ than $\lceil \frac{m}{2} \rceil$ mediating events. The structure of quantum interference thus teaches us that events can influence each other in a non-separable fashion, but that this non-separability has a certain exactly quantifiable limit.

2025-10-23T21:45:40Z 31 pages + References + Appendix, 5 figures Sebastian Horvat http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20695v1 2025-10-23T16:07:06Z

This paper completes a three-part study of Einstein's 1905 special relativity by reconstructing the experimental pressures that shaped his thinking from 1895 to June 1905. Following Stachel's historiographical line, I trace Einstein's path under the cumulative weight of a series of recalcitrant experiments: stellar aberration, Arago's prism test, Fresnel's partial-drag account, Boscovich's proposal of a water-filled telescope, Fizeau's water-tube result, ether-drift null experiments, and the magnet-conductor induction asymmetry. Lorentz's electron theory attempted to domesticate these findings within a fragile ether framework, while Einstein, still loyal to Maxwell's equations, became increasingly troubled by their conflict with Galilean kinematics. The paper examines Einstein's temporary adherence to emission theory and its decisive breakdown in light of Fizeau's result. In this reconstruction, the 1905 paper does not emerge as a kinematic postulate ex nihilo, but as a principled resolution forced by an interconnected complex of experimental anomalies.

2025-10-23T16:07:06Z Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20865v1 2025-10-23T01:25:24Z

Philip Warren Anderson was a pioneering theoretical physicist whose work fundamentally shaped our understanding of complex systems. Anderson received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1977 for his groundbreaking research on localization and magnetism, yet he did so much more. His work on magnetism included antiferromagnetism, superexchange, the Kondo problem and local magnetic moments in metals. Anderson pointed out the importance of disorder through his work on localization, non-crystalline solids and spin glasses. In superconductivity, he is known for the dirty superconductor theorem, showing the gauge-invariance of the BCS theory, his study of flux creep, and for his collaboration with experimentalists to realize the Josephson effect. Anderson's resonating valence bond theory may yet play an important role in high temperature superconductivity. Anderson was also fascinated by broken symmetry, and he laid the theoretical groundwork for what is now known as the Anderson-Higgs mechanism, showing how gauge bosons can acquire mass - an insight that played a foundational role in the Standard Model of particle physics. In his seminal "More is Different" paper, Anderson argued that the collective emergent phenomena that arise in complex interacting systems cannot be deduced from their fundamental parts. Anderson's legacy endures not only through the lasting impact of his scientific work but also through his influence on generations of physicists who continue to explore the rich landscape of collective behavior in nature.

2025-10-23T01:25:24Z A biographical memoir of P. W. Anderson to be published in Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. 27 pages, 7 figures/photos Premala Chandra Piers Coleman Clare C. Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18848v1 2025-10-21T17:38:54Z

This article offers a broad-brush account of the Newtonian three-body problem, from its origins with Newton to its vibrant present, emphasizing its enduring influence on theoretical physics. It unfolds through a series of self-contained episodes that illuminate the scientific fields and the paradigm shift that have grown out of this problem.

2025-10-21T17:38:54Z 27 pages, 15 figures Entropy 28, 610 (2026) Barak Kol 10.3390/e28060610 http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01317v3 2025-10-21T14:59:19Z

One cannot justifiably presuppose the physical salience of structures derived via decoherence theory based upon an entirely uninterpreted use of the quantum formalism. Non-probabilistic accounts of the emergence of probability via decoherence are unconvincing. An alternative account of the emergence of probability involves the combination of a partially interpreted decoherence model and an averaging of observables with respect to a positive-definite quasi-probability function and neglect of terms $O(\hbar)$. Our analysis delimits the context in which the combination of decoherence and a semi-classical averaging allows us to recover a classical probability model within an emergent coarse-grained description.

2024-10-02T08:16:09Z Richard Dawid Karim P. Y. Thébault 10.1017/psa.2025.10110 http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18111v1 2025-10-20T21:22:29Z

This article proposes a reading of quantum metaphysical indeterminacy from the perspective of Parsons' Nuclear Meinongianism. In doing so, we identify a fundamental incompatibility between a key feature of Parsons' theory and standard quantum mechanics. Our approach interprets quantum indeterminacy as property incompleteness. However, this move, when combined with Parsons' framework, leads to what we term the ``Incompleteness-Entails-Nonexistence Principle'' (IENP), which implausibly entails the nonexistence of quantum objects. For Meinongianism to be a suitable tool for the metaphysics of quantum mechanics, this principle must be addressed. We argue for dropping the IENP and discuss the resulting metaphysical and metametaphysical consequences.

2025-10-20T21:22:29Z Forthcoming in Principia Raoni Arroyo Renato Semaniuc Valvassori http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23616v1 2025-10-18T01:00:48Z

The American scientific community is reeling from funding cuts and policy directives that will debilitate scientific research and education. The underlying hostilities fueling these attacks have intensified in recent years as the COVID-19 pandemic increased suspicion of scientific experts and the institutional embrace of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in 2020 prompted a backlash along longstanding political fault lines. Under the banner of anti-elitism, opponents of science and DEI have formed a coalition that sees attacks on higher education as a strategic means to achieve their political ends. While some of their arguments contain legitimate criticisms, academics must resist these attacks that seek to dismantle higher education altogether. Instead, we should engage the public in our research process, build a scientific practice representative of and accountable to the communities we serve, and interrogate the aims of our work by critically studying the history of science.

2025-10-18T01:00:48Z 13 pages excluding references. This paper was written for an invited editorial, but its publication was denied on political grounds Kay T. Xia Thayer L. Anderson Phelan Yu http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00546v3 2025-10-16T20:06:27Z

In this work, we show that a counterfactual account of L"uders' rule -- which we argue is naturally implied by the mathematical structure of the rule itself -- rules out underlying-state models of quantum mechanics (a type of hidden-variable model, typically used in the contextuality and nonlocality literature, where quantum states are treated as probability measures over ``better-defined states''). This incompatibility arises because the counterfactual update requires ontological models to update their states according to conditional probability, which in turn establishes an equivalence between compatibility and the existence of such models.

2025-02-01T20:26:37Z 4+3 pages, no figures. Accepted for publication by Phys. Rev. A as a Letter. Matches accepted version Phys. Rev. A 112, L050202 (2025) Alisson Tezzin Bárbara Amaral Jonte R. Hance 10.1103/mrqr-sdyf http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02779v2 2025-10-16T07:35:00Z

We trace the history of conformal bootstrap from its early days to our times - a great example of unity of physics. We start by describing little-known details about the origins of conformal field theory in the study of strong interactions and critical phenomena in the 1960s and 1970s. We describe similarities and differences between approaches and results of the main groups in Moscow, Rome, and Sofia. Then come the breakthroughs in the 1980s and the 1990s, in particular 2D CFT and holography. Finally, we describe the genesis of the numerical conformal bootstrap, from the conformal technicolor bounds in the 2000s, to the determination of the 3D Ising critical exponents in the 2010s. We conclude with some outstanding challenges. We stress that conformal invariance is a symmetry of nature.

2025-09-02T19:29:07Z 28 pages + refs; v2: typos corrected, version to appear in IJMPA International Journal of Modern Physics A (2025) Slava Rychkov 10.1142/S0217751X25300212 http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13938v1 2025-10-15T17:44:31Z

We present a novel derivation of the spacetime metric generated by matter, without invoking Einstein's field equations. For static sources, the metric arises from a relativistic formulation of D'Alembert's principle, where the inertial force is treated as a real dynamical entity that exactly compensates gravity. This leads to a conformastatic metric whose geodesic equation, parametrized by proper time, reproduces the relativistic version of Newton's second law for free fall. To extend the description to moving matter, uniformly or otherwise, we apply a Lorentz transformation to the static metric. The resulting non static metric accounts for the motion of the sources and, remarkably, matches the weak field limit of general relativity as obtained from the linearized Einstein equations in the de Donder or Lorenz gauge. This approach, at least at Solar System scales, where gravitational fields are weak, is grounded in a new dynamical interpretation of the Equivalence Principle. It demonstrates how gravity can emerge from the relativistic structure of inertia, without postulating or solving Einstein's equations.

2025-10-15T17:44:31Z Version accepted in Symmetry Symmetry 2025, 17(8), 1340 Jaume de Haro Emilio Elizalde 10.3390/sym17081340 http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13280v1 2025-10-15T08:25:43Z

The University of Strasbourg, fundamentally humanistic since its creation, has a complicated history, being sometimes German, sometimes French through the ages. If one focus, from 1871, on the area of mathematics, we can identify two periods. Political goals led to send high-level scientists, sometimes rather young, to develop theoretical, later applied mathematics, leading to a novel area, mechanics. The first period, under Prussian influence until 1918, will see the emergence of an Institute of mathematics such it was existing in G{ö}ttingen; the second, dominated by the French influence, will make Strasbourg an anteroom to positions at the prestigious Faculty of Sciences in Paris, the Sorbonne, the Academy of Sciences or the ENS. Present communication will give an inside, through its history, of the development of Mathematics in Strasbourg, prelude to emerging Mechanics and the creation of what will become the Institut de M{é}canique des Fluides et des Solides en 2000.

2025-10-15T08:25:43Z in French language 26{è}me Congr{è}s Fran{\c c}ais de M{é}canique, Association FRan{\c c}aise de M{é}canique/GTT-AUM, Aug 2025, Metz (France), France D Huilier ICube