https://arxiv.org/api/OY/t3RWlry3X8rHdj5CuKb14qQ4 2026-03-22T13:14:26Z 5537 30 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01027v1 2026-03-01T10:13:54Z

The master student at Lomonosov University in Moscow E.P. Velikhov formulated 1959 the theory of magnetorotational instability, which dominates current astrophysics. A meteoric career made him later the science, nuclear and disarmament advisor to Gorbachev and Yeltsin. This article describes the interactions between Velikhov and the PROMISE team from Potsdam and Dresden-Rossendorf when it came to experimentally testing the theory in the laboratory in the 2000s. At an MHD conference in Catania, Sicily, he offered the public the use of small, transportable Russian nuclear power plants anywhere in the world until the fusion machines currently under development had finally solved the energy problem.

2026-03-01T10:13:54Z 31 pages, 12 figures Günther Rüdiger http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15638v1 2026-02-27T20:03:51Z

This paper commemorates the 100th anniversary of quantum mechanics as a theoretical model of atomic phenomena. We discuss briefly the foundational contributions of Werner Heisenberg, Wolfgang Pauli, Erwin Shrodinger, and Paul Dirac to the development of quantum theory. Special attention is given to the often-overlooked contributions of Charles Galton Darwin and Hendrik Anthony Kramers. We examine the three periods of quantum theory development: foundation, development, and the modern era connected with information science. The paper also highlights current challenges facing quantum theory, including the quantum-classical boundary, quantum gravity, and the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy. One of the goals of this article is to extend the recent review in J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58 (2025) 053001 primarily by a a more detailed consideration of the period of formation of quantum mechanics.

2026-02-27T20:03:51Z 16 pages Volodimir Simulik Denys I. Bondar http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07123v5 2026-02-27T09:00:57Z

There is a widespread assumption that the universe in general, and the Earth's biosphere in particular, is becoming more complex over time. This paper formulates this assumption as a macroscopic law, the law of increasing complexity, for a system over a finite time span. It hypothesizes that this macroscopic law emerges in certain non-equilibrium systems with abundant free energy flows, such as the observable universe and the Earth's biosphere. We distinguish between two types of complexity: disorganized and organized. The complexity associated with this assumption is organized complexity. To formulate this law, we employ a quantitative definition of organized complexity as applied to probability distributions. We represent any object of complexity as the source of its observed value, which is expressed as a probability distribution; this enables a unified treatment of diverse objects. This formulation necessitates the use of observation systems to represent these objects. We introduce an order relation between these observation systems to demonstrate that the complexity of an object possesses a generic property, one that does not depend on any specific observation system. This paper develops a novel methodology for this macroscopic law, which formulates the arrow of time in terms of increasing organized complexity for certain non-equilibrium systems. This contrasts with the second law of thermodynamics, which formulates the arrow of time in terms of increasing disorganized complexity (entropy) for isolated systems. We apply this formulation to the fine-tuning problem: the puzzling observation that the fundamental physical constants appear to be fine-tuned for life on Earth. Our new explanation of the fine-tuning problem posits that these constants are fine-tuned for the emergence of the law of increasing complexity.

2023-02-14T15:31:56Z 12 pages Tatsuaki Okamoto http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23491v1 2026-02-26T20:53:16Z

The probabilistic description of the time evolution of a physical system can take two conceptually distinct forms: a trajectory of probabilities, which specifies how probabilities evolve over time, and a probability on trajectories, which assigns probabilities to possible histories. A lack of a clear distinction between these two probabilistic descriptions has given rise to a number of conceptual difficulties, particularly in recent analyses of stochastic-quantum correspondence. This paper provides a systematic account of their relationship. We define probability dynamics and stochastic process families together with a precise notion of implementation that connects the two descriptions. We show that implementations are generically non-unique, that every probability dynamics admits a Markovian implementation, and characterize when non-Markovian implementations are possible. We expose fallacies in common arguments for the linearity of probability dynamics based on the law of total probability and clarify the proper interpretation of ``transition matrices'' by distinguishing dynamics-level maps from the conditional probability matrices of implementing processes. We further introduce decomposability as the appropriate general notion of stepwise evolution for (possibly nonlinear) probability dynamics, relate it to divisibility in the linear case -- showing that the two can come apart -- and disentangle both notions from Markovianity and time-homogeneity. Finally, we connect these results to what we call statistical dynamics, in which linearity is indeed physically motivated, and contrast the framework with quantum mechanics.

2026-02-26T20:53:16Z Győző Egri Marton Gomori Balazs Gyenis Gábor Hofer-Szabó http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22792v1 2026-02-26T09:29:00Z

Bohr's principle of complementarity, prohibiting simultaneous access to certain physical properties within a single experimental arrangement, is considered to be a defining feature of quantum mechanics. It is commonly viewed as inducing an intrinsic hierarchy among incompatible observables: some sets of quantum properties are fundamentally more incompatible than others, as quantified by the maximal sharpness permitting their joint measurement. We show that this hierarchy ceases to be absolute in the multi-copy regime. Analyzing qubit spin observables, we prove a No-Comparison Theorem establishing that no global ordering of incompatible observable sets is preserved across all finite-copy configurations. In particular, two sets of observables can exhibit reversed complementarity ordering depending solely on whether the available resources are arranged as identical copies or as parallel-antiparallel pairs. Thus, the degree of quantum incompatibility is not an intrinsic property of observables alone but depends on the global configuration of the prepared quantum probes. Our results uncover a configuration-dependent structure of complementarity, reveal a subtle role of entanglement in shaping the structure of measurement limitations, and call for a reassessment of quantum information protocols under finite resources.

2026-02-26T09:29:00Z 4.25 pages (double column) + 6 pages (single column), 4 figures; Comments are welcome Kunika Agarwal Sahil Gopalkrishna Naik Ananya Chakraborty Guruprasad Kar Ram Krishna Patra Snehasish Roy Chowdhury Manik Banik http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20331v1 2026-02-23T20:26:47Z

Hilbert space fundamentalism (HSF) states that everything about the physical world is encoded in the Hamiltonian operator and the state vector (as a unit vector, not a wavefunction, which requires additional specification of a configuration space, a position basis, or the position observables). That all structures needed to describe reality, including subsystems, space, fields, emerge from these. I show that HSF can't account for our observations that the physical world changes in time.

2026-02-23T20:26:47Z 3 pages Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19365v1 2026-02-22T22:20:51Z

In the nineteenth century, the Dutch established time signals in their Atlantic colonies to synchronise maritime navigation with European standards. In Paramaribo (Suriname), a sophisticated sequence of apparatus -- including time balls, noon guns, discs and flags -- operated from 1851 until World War I. Naval officers aboard guard ships used sextants equipped with artificial horizons to determine local noon, thus integrating the colony into the global Greenwich-based cartographic system. This infrastructure was not merely technical; it became a civic ritual, with the daily noon gun structuring urban life and becoming a point of political negotiation between naval commanders and the colonial governor. In contrast, the Dutch Caribbean islands employed simpler, pragmatic systems. Curaçao used a daily time flag, a cost-effective solution suited to its climate and harbour scale, while smaller islands like Aruba and St. Eustatius relied on occasional noon guns. This diversity reflected a decentralised colonial administration that adapted technologies to local conditions and budgets. The history of these time signals reveals a process of hybrid adaptation, not simply replication of European models. They were shaped by environmental challenges, fiscal constraints and local politics, functioning simultaneously as navigational aids and civic landmarks. Their eventual decline, owing to budgetary pressures and new technologies like wireless telegraphy, underscores the fragile and negotiated nature of colonial scientific infrastructures.

2026-02-22T22:20:51Z 14 pages, incl. 5 figures. Accepted for publication in the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (December 2026) Richard de Grijs Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19364v1 2026-02-22T22:15:46Z

In the nineteenth century, the Netherlands quickly adopted the time ball -- a British innovation for maritime chronometer calibration -- in its main naval ports (Nieuwediep/Den Helder, Vlissingen, Hellevoetsluis) and commercial centres (Amsterdam, Rotterdam). A large sphere dropped from a mast at a fixed time, the device enabled ships to verify their chronometers against a standard, essential for accurate longitude determination and safe navigation. Its ready acceptance was eased by indigenous Dutch traditions. Rural communities had long used visual time signals like the sjouw on Terschelling island, a wicker ball raised on a mast to mark the lunch hour and milking time for farmers, and the lawei, a basket or sack used in the peat bogs of Friesland to regulate labourers' hours. The Dutch time-signal system was distinguished by its strong institutional backing from the country's Royal Navy, its Hydrographic Service and by professional astronomers. Among the latter, Frederik Kaiser was a pivotal figure, vehemently defending the system's accuracy and pioneering technical improvements. He successfully advocated for replacing the traditional falling ball with a system of rotating flaps, which provided a more instantaneous and reliable visual signal. Beyond their practical role, time signals became civic spectacles and symbols of Dutch scientific modernity and imperial reach. Their decline began with the electric telegraph and was finalised by wireless radio, which allowed ships to calibrate chronometers at sea.

2026-02-22T22:15:46Z 24 pages, incl. 15 figures. Accepted for publication in the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (December 2026) Richard de Grijs Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18641v1 2026-02-20T22:30:56Z

In April 2024, the White House directed NASA to establish Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC) by December 2026. The programme assumes that a unified time standard can be constructed by deploying atomic clocks on the lunar surface, computing relativistic corrections, and distributing synchronized time via LunaNet. This paper argues that the entire enterprise rests on a category mistake in the sense introduced by Ryle and developed by Spekkens in quantum foundations: it treats "synchronized time" as an ontic entity -- something that exists independently and can be transmitted from authoritative sources to dependent receivers -- when it is in fact an epistemic construct: a model-dependent representation of observer-relative clock relationships. We analyze the cislunar time programme through the lens of Forward-In-Time-Only (FITO) assumptions, Spekkens' Leibnizian operationalism, the Wood-Spekkens fine-tuning argument, and the distinction between ontic and epistemic interpretations that has dissolved long-standing puzzles in quantum mechanics. We show that the same conceptual move that dissolves quantum "mysteries" -- recognizing what is epistemic versus what is ontic -- dissolves the apparent coherence of the cislunar time programme and reveals it as an engineering project built on a philosophical confusion. We sketch a transactional alternative grounded in bilateral atomic interactions rather than unidirectional time distribution.

2026-02-20T22:30:56Z 13 pages, no figures Paul Borrill http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18334v1 2026-02-20T16:39:35Z

C.V. Raman (1888-1970) was one of the pioneering scientists to have emerged from India during the colonial era. His scientific explorations were driven by his curiosity to understand wave phenomena. Naturally, optics and related physical effects were at the heart of such an exploration. Apart from his Nobel prize-winning discovery of the Raman effect, his research included topics such as oblique diffraction, light scattering from liquids and amorphous solids, classical and quantum nature of light, acousto-optics, haloes and coronae (speckles), crystal dynamics and soft modes, optics of minerals, floral colors, physiology of vision and many other aspects related to light in natural settings. In this article, I give a historical overview of some of the work by C.V. Raman and his group that had a direct connection to optics and optical spectroscopy.

2026-02-20T16:39:35Z Invited review. Submitted to Journal of Optical Society of America B - Special issue on "Optics in South Asia" G. V. Pavan Kumar http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01617v2 2026-02-20T14:01:48Z

Although several accounts of scientific understanding exist, the concept of understanding in relation to technology remains underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a philosophical account of technological understanding: the type of understanding that is required for and reflected by successfully designing and using technological artefacts. We develop this notion by building on the concept of scientific understanding. Drawing on parallels between science and technology, and specifically between scientific theories and technological artefacts, we extend the idea of scientific understanding into the realm of technology. We argue that, just as scientific understanding involves the ability to explain a phenomenon using a theory, technological understanding involves the ability to use a technological artefact to realise a practical aim. Both theories and artefacts are tools, and using them successfully requires the cognitive skill of understanding. Technological understanding is thus conceived as the ability to recognise how a practical aim can be achieved by using a technological artefact. In a context of design, this general notion of technological understanding is specified as the ability to design an artefact that, by producing a phenomenon through its physical structure, achieves the intended aim. By analogy with De Regt's criterion of the intelligibility of theories, we give, as a precondition for technological understanding, a criterion for the intelligibility of a technological artefact. We illustrate our concept of technological understanding through two running examples: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and superconducting quantum computers. Our account highlights the epistemic dimension of engaging with technology and, by allowing for context-dependent specifications, provides guidance for testing and improving technological understanding in specific contexts.

2025-03-03T14:51:02Z Eline de Jong Sebastian De Haro http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18115v1 2026-02-20T10:07:42Z

This work investigates the geometrical properties of self-gravitating $N$-body systems from the perspective established by Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein concerning the operational nature of measured geometry. Utilizing recent numerical analyses of central configurations--special equilibrium solutions to the Newtonian $N$-body problem--we uncover systematic spatial variations in nearest-neighbor particle separations correlated with the radial distance from the system's center of mass. We argue that these variations reflect a context-dependent, emergent effective geometry shaped by gravitational interactions, in accordance with Poincaré's assertion that measured geometry depends on the forces influencing measuring devices, and Einstein's view that rods and clocks define physical geometry through their local dynamics. By revisiting these foundational insights within a modern computational framework, we provide evidence that geometry in self-gravitating Newtonian systems is not a fixed background, but an emergent construct arising from internal physical interactions.

2026-02-20T10:07:42Z 6 pages, 5 figures Maria I. R. Lourenço Julian Barbour Francisco S. N. Lobo http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16480v5 2026-02-19T17:34:13Z

For the simple system of a point-like particle confined to a straight line, I compile, initially in a concise table, the structural elements of quantum mechanics and contrast them with those of classical (statistical) mechanics. Despite many similarities, there are the well-known fundamental differences, resulting from the algebraic non-commutativity in the quantal structure. The latter was discovered by Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976) in June 1925 on the small island of Helgoland in the North Sea, as a consequence of understanding atomic spectral data within a matrix scheme consistent with energy conservation. I discuss the differences and exemplify their quantifications by the variance and entropic indeterminacy inequalities, by (pseudo-)classical bounds on quantum canonical partition functions, and by the correlation inequalities of John Bell (1928-1990) and others.

2025-06-19T17:25:40Z Differences from version v4: typos corrected, minor stylistic improvements, and three further references. To appear as a chapter of the book "Quantum Mechanics: A Century Later", ed. by Tuck C. Choy, World Scientific, Singapore 2026 Hajo Leschke http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13520v3 2026-02-19T11:43:12Z

J. B. Fourier in his \emph{Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur} of 1822 introduced, amongst other things, two ideas that have made a fundamental impact in fields as diverse as Mathematical Physics, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Music. The first one of these, a method to find the coefficients for a trigonometric series describing an arbitrary function, was very early on picked up by G. Ohm and H. Helmholtz as the foundation for a theory of \emph{musical tones}. The second one, which is described by Fourier's double integral, became the basis for treating certain kinds of infinity in discontinuous functions, as shown by A. De Morgan in his 1842 \emph{The Differential and Integral Calculus}. Both make up the fundamental basis for what is now commonly known as the \emph{Fourier theorem}. With the help of P. A. M. Dirac's insights into the nature of these infinities, we can have a compact description of the frequency spectrum of a function of time, or conversely of a waveform corresponding to a given function of frequency. This paper, using solely primary sources, takes us from the physics of heat propagation to the modern theory of musical signals. It concludes with some considerations on the inherent duality of time and frequency emerging from Fourier's theorem.

2026-02-13T23:18:28Z Victor Lazzarini http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17150v1 2026-02-19T07:50:42Z

I argue that if a special science satisfies certain key assumptions that are familiar from physicalist accounts of the special sciences and from physics, then its causal regularities have an associated notion of entropy, and that this causal entropy cannot decrease from a robust cause to its effect. Due to its analogy with the second laws of thermodynamics and statistical physics, I call the latter conclusion the causal second law. In this paper, I clarify the key assumptions, prove the causal second law, give sufficient conditions for causal entropy increase, relate the causal second law to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, and argue that the reversibility objection does not threaten it. In addition, I claim that the causal second law is compatible with a non-metaphysical understanding of supervenience and the open systems view, argue that it does not imply a causal time arrow, reflect on relaxing the robustness condition, question whether it is necessary to invoke thermodynamics to show that special sciences' time arrows exist, and discuss a transition-relative-frequency-based, special-science-internal characterization of causal regularities.

2026-02-19T07:50:42Z Forthcoming in Nous: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/nous.70042 Balazs Gyenis 10.1111/nous.70042