https://arxiv.org/api/OY/t3RWlry3X8rHdj5CuKb14qQ4 2026-06-09T21:32:30Z 5605 30 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11420v1 2026-05-12T02:15:13Z

Over the past two decades, the rapid surge in data-intensive computational techniques for statistical modeling may have had the effect of diminishing the use of applied mathematics in causal scientific inquiry. In this paper, co-authored by an astrophysicist, a mathematician, and philosophers, we assess the hazards of neglecting the branch of mathematics that constructs models to address causal questions in favor of statistical modeling alone. Causality is relevant in all branches of science and is often elucidated through applied mathematics. Here, we illuminate the idea with examples drawn from space physics and medical sciences. We examine causal questions to demonstrate how applied mathematical and statistical methods may differentiate between two fundamental facets of causality, i.e., mechanistic and difference-making. Understanding such foundational differences in causality may, in some cases, help explain discrepant or erroneous research results. Most importantly, understanding the relationship between causality and analytical approaches used in science has the potential to strengthen the rigor and reliability of scientific inquiry through optimal selection of mathematical and/or statistical methods.

2026-05-12T02:15:13Z Marzieh Asgari-Targhi Ned Amene Asgari-Targhi Ned Mahboubeh Asgari-Targhi Ned Edward J. Ned Hall http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11058v1 2026-05-11T16:54:41Z

We present results from the Big Mysteries Survey, a large-scale survey conducted through the American Physical Society's Physics Magazine on foundational and controversial topics in contemporary physics. The survey provides a snapshot of physicists' views on issues in cosmology, black-hole physics, quantum mechanics, quantum gravity, and anthropic coincidences. A central finding is that several positions often described publicly as field-wide ``consensus'' views are, in practice, supported by much narrower majorities or by pluralities rather than majorities.

2026-05-11T16:54:41Z 31 pages, 12 figures, interactive data available at: https://nafshordi.github.io/aps-dashboard/ Niayesh Afshordi Phil Halper Matteo Rini Michael Schirber http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04159v2 2026-05-10T19:08:17Z

Can we infer whether all of physical reality began to exist? Several novel results are offered suggesting a negative verdict. First, a common strategy for defending a cosmic beginning involves showing that individual beginningless cosmological models are implausible. This strategy is shown to make an elementary error in confirmation theory. Second, two necessary (but not necessarily sufficient) conditions are offered for a cosmic beginning. Third, three extensions are offered to the Malament-Manchak theorems. The three extensions show that in almost all classical spacetimes, observers cannot collect sufficient data to determine whether the application conditions for the classic singularity theorems are satisfied or whether their spacetime satisfies the two necessary conditions for a cosmic beginning. Lastly, a reply is offered to the objection that the skeptical consequences of the three extensions can be overcome with induction. Importantly, all past singular dust FLRW spacetimes have observationally indistinguishable counterparts which, while sharing a number of important local properties, either do not include a singularity to the past of every point or else do not have the sort of time ordering intuitively required for a cosmic beginning.

2026-03-04T15:16:41Z Daniel Linford http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04664v2 2026-05-10T13:21:13Z

Quantum paradoxes show that the outcomes of different quantum measurements cannot be described by a single measurement-independent reality. Any theoretical description of a quantum measurement implies the selection of a specific measurement context. Here, we investigate generalised quantum measurements, in order to identify the mechanism by which this specific context is selected. We show that external quantum fluctuations, represented by the initial state of the measurement apparatus, play an essential role in the selection of the context. This has the non-trivial consequence that, when considering measurements other than just idealised projection-valued measures, different outcomes of a single measurement setup can represent different measurement contexts. We further show this result underpins recent claims that contextuality can occur in scenarios without measurement incompatibility.

2025-01-08T18:22:34Z 16 pages, 1 figure. Accepted in Quantum - matches accepted version Quantum 10, 2106 (2026) Jonte R. Hance Ming Ji Tomonori Matsushita Holger F. Hofmann 10.22331/q-2026-05-13-2106 http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15866v2 2026-05-08T16:35:48Z

For more than half a century, dualities have been at the heart of modern physics. From quantum mechanics to statistical mechanics, condensed matter physics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity, dualities have proven useful in solving problems that are otherwise quite intractable. Being surprising and unexpected, dualities have been taken to raise philosophical questions about the nature and formulation of scientific theories, scientific realism, emergence, symmetries, explanation, understanding, and theory construction. This book discusses what dualities are, gives a selection of examples, explores the themes and roles that make dualities interesting, and highlights their most salient types. It aims to be an entry point into discussions of dualities in both physics and philosophy. The philosophical discussion emphasises three main topics: whether duals are theoretically equivalent, the view of scientific theories that is suggested by dualities (namely, a geometric view of theories), and the compatibility between duality and emergence.

2025-09-19T11:06:59Z This is the pre-submission version of a forthcoming Cambridge Element in the Foundations of Contemporary Physics and is available here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/dualities-in-physics/45667B3C71A2C7A5B347748239243EC7. When citing this work, please refer to the published version Sebastian De Haro Enrico Cinti 10.1017/9781009203845 http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09037v2 2026-05-08T11:03:31Z

This entry reviews Rudolf Carnap's philosophical views on the quantum mechanics of his time. It also offers some thoughts on how Carnap might have reacted to some recent developments in the foundations of quantum mechanics.

2023-04-18T14:56:00Z 8 pages; forthcoming in Carnap Handbuch, Metzler, ed. by Georg Schiemer and Christian Damböck Sebastian Horvat Iulian D. Toader http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07090v1 2026-05-08T01:16:15Z

The consistent histories formalism can be used to describe histories comprised of events across many systems, times, and places, plausibly rich enough to describe our experiences of the classical world; however, many consistent history sets are nonclassical and thus not obviously relevant to our experiences. Meanwhile, the program of environmentally induced decoherence identifies dynamically privileged classical degrees of freedom, but provides no general account of when or how many such degrees of freedom consistently combine to form histories. This work shows that the strengths of these two approaches can be combined by adopting a dynamics-first perspective on decoherence. Inspired by quantum causal models and quantum Darwinism, we define the process of decoherence in terms of the causal influences through unitary dynamics required for the proliferation of information about observables. We characterise decoherence as a property of the unitary dynamics, without presupposing the existence of any quantum state. Instead, we show that the state emerges from dual decoherence, related to decoherence by time-reversal of the unitary dynamics. Indeed, for any set of systems in an arbitrary unitary circuit, decoherence and its dual single out a privileged consistent history set -- and we demonstrate through examples that states emerge from dual decoherence while outcomes emerge from decoherence. Hence the idea that quantum states emerge from the process of decoherence turns out to be the key missing ingredient for unifying environmentally induced decoherence and consistent histories. Taking this idea ontologically seriously leads to a recently proposed causal interpretation of quantum theory or a dynamics-first version of the Everett interpretation. The causal approach also sheds light on the suppression of off-diagonal terms, time asymmetry, and robustness of the pointer basis.

2026-05-08T01:16:15Z 41+12 pages Nick Ormrod Tein van der Lugt Yìlè Yīng Jarosław K. Korbicz http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11065v2 2026-05-07T20:50:35Z

Physics seeks to uncover the laws of Nature and express them through mathematical equations. Despite the vast diversity of natural phenomena, physical equations exhibit structural regularities that set them apart from arbitrary mathematical expressions. While principles such as dimensional analysis have long guided the formulation of physical models, the exploration of more subtle statistical patterns within the equations of physics remains an open question. Here, by analysing four corpora of physics equations and applying advanced implicit-likelihood techniques, we find that the frequency of mathematical operators follows an exponential decay law, in contrast to Zipf's power law for word frequencies in natural languages. This reveals a statistical meta-law of physics, possibly reflecting a combination of communication efficiency and constraints imposed by Nature itself. The meta-law offers practical benefits for symbolic regression by drastically narrowing down the space of physically plausible expressions. More broadly, it may inform the development of language models that can generate coherent mathematical representations, advancing the automation of physical law discovery.

2024-08-12T18:34:57Z 11 pages, 5 figures, 2 table Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci (2026) 384 (2317): 20250091 Andrei Constantin Deaglan Bartlett Harry Desmond Pedro G. Ferreira 10.1098/rsta.2025.0091 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04192v1 2026-05-05T18:34:18Z

This note examines an apparently unpublished manuscript on special relativity written by Conrad Habicht in 1914 and made available online by the ETH-Bibliothek Zürich in December 2024. To the best of my knowledge, no study of its content has yet been published. Habicht was one of Einstein's closest companions during the Bern years. Between February 1902 and mid-1904 he shared with Einstein many occasions for discussion and companionship in Bern. After leaving the city, he remained in close contact with Einstein through visits, reciprocal stays, and a substantial correspondence extending from the years immediately following 1905 to the eve of the First World War. The manuscript offers a clear and pedagogical presentation of special relativity. Its historical interest lies in the structure of the exposition and in the memory of the theory that the text preserves. Habicht does not present special relativity as an isolated creation beginning from Einstein's 1905 paper alone. He devotes considerable space to the pre-Einsteinian problem situation: the classical principle of relativity, the ether, Fizeau's experiment, Michelson--Morley, Lorentz's theory, the contraction hypothesis, local time, and the privileged system of the stationary ether. Lorentz is treated as the central figure who brought the electrodynamics of moving bodies to its most acute form before Einstein's intervention. This note provides a qualitative description of the manuscript, with particular attention to its structure, its treatment of the relation between classical mechanics and electrodynamics, and the respective roles assigned to Lorentz, Michelson--Morley, Einstein, and Minkowski.

2026-05-05T18:34:18Z Hector Giacomini http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02991v1 2026-05-04T16:57:19Z

Vishaps -- dragon stones -- discovered in the Armenian Highlands convey a remarkable message about the spiritual and social character of their epoch, c. 4000 BC. The unexpected bimodal distribution of their elevations indicates the deliberate, labor-intensive placement of these massive stones -- some weighing up to 7--9 tons -- in locations where the period suitable for construction activities at high altitudes was extremely limited. Their positions, correlated with nodes of previously identified prehistoric irrigation systems, support the interpretation that they were dedicated to a cult of water. This evidence points to the existence of an organized and unified society capable of sustaining and maintaining such a resource-intensive cult.

2026-05-04T16:57:19Z 17 pages, 7 figures; npj Heritage Science (accepted for publication) Vahe Gurzadyan Arsen Bobokhyan 10.1038/s40494-026-02603-7 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02621v1 2026-05-04T14:11:24Z

A recent article by Lohmiller \& Slotine (Proc.\ R.\ Soc.\ A \textbf{482}: 20250413) claims that the Schrödinger equation can be solved exactly using only classical least action and classical fluid density, asserting that this formulation avoids semiclassical approximations. We show that their mathematical derivation contains a foundational error. By neglecting the spatial derivatives of the probability density amplitude, the authors inadvertently omit the quantum potential -- the term originally identified by Madelung and later emphasised by Bohm. Consequently, their proposed equivalence is not exact but rather constitutes the standard semiclassical approximation. We further demonstrate that each of the paper's illustrative examples either belongs to a class where the quantum potential vanishes identically due to the geometry of the problem, or recovers the correct quantum result by importing quantum eigenfunctions through the initial conditions, thereby concealing the error.

2026-05-04T14:11:24Z Comment on arXiv:2405.06328 Gabor Vattay http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23943v1 2026-05-01T23:39:57Z

Quantum cognition often explains order effects, contextuality, and violations of the law of total probability by replacing classical probability with quantum probability on a fixed event structure. This paper proposes a different interpretation: quantum probability is the fixed-spacetime projection of contextual spacetime formation under finite-state requirements. The framework begins not with time, space, objects, or probabilities, but with requirements such as finite representational capacity, single-state semantic stability, context-sensitive intervention, avoidance of explicit context labels, coherent world-formation, and intersubjective transformability. When these requirements cannot be realized within a single global Boolean event structure, the mismatch appears, under fixed-spacetime projection, as noncommutativity, interference, and quantum-like probability. Building on prior single-state approaches to contextuality, we reinterpret classical contextual bookkeeping cost as the fixed-spacetime shadow of contextual spacetime formation. Auxiliary memory or context labels in a classical representation correspond, in this account, to holonomy-like mismatch among locally Boolean logic-worlds. The interference term is the cross term generated when locally classical realization contributions are nontrivially glued and projected back into a fixed classical spacetime form. The result is a transcendental-operational realist account: objecthood, eventhood, probability, and spacetime are treated as forms of realization under requirements, while objectivity is defined by invariants preserved across observer- and history-dependent spacetime formations.

2026-05-01T23:39:57Z 19 pages, 1 figure Song-Ju Kim http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19323v4 2026-05-01T14:44:27Z

Any representational enterprise must omit variation in order to function. NASA still uses Newtonian mechanics, though Einstein superseded Newton, and the standard picture of scientific progress cannot explain how. A description that omitted nothing would be identical to its subject and would explain nothing. This paper argues that omission is not a defect but the central structural feature of any enterprise that builds representations from incomplete information. The key concept is projection: a principled mapping from underlying complexity to a descriptive space that partitions states into equivalence classes, omits within-class variation, and makes patterns visible that would otherwise be lost. Projection is simultaneously revelatory and constitutive: it makes genuine invariants tractably accessible while bringing into being the concepts through which they become expressible. The paper distinguishes vertical cases, in which earlier projections survive as limiting cases of more refined successors with recoverable omission, from horizontal cases, in which omission is constitutive, and invariants are accessible only at the level of the projection that defines them. The framework accounts for persistent pluralism in mature sciences, treats the renormalization group as a systematic implementation of the invariant-tracking criterion, and defends a level-relative realism on which higher-level projections reveal genuine structural features of the world. The deepest claim is an inversion of the standard picture: perspectival structure is not a concession to complexity but the condition for invariant detection. A world rich in invariants cannot be exhausted by a single projection.

2026-03-17T13:58:56Z Harry Sticker http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00406v1 2026-05-01T04:54:54Z

Selection artefacts are common in science. A method of selecting samples from a larger population may produce bias, in either direction. It may induce correlations between variables independent in the full population, or mask correlations between variables dependent in the full population. Here we propose a surprising application of these familiar ideas. We argue that they are relevant to puzzling correlations uncovered in quantum theory by John Stewart Bell (Bell 1964). In the light of Bell's work and subsequent experiments it is widely believed that the quantum world is 'nonlocal', in apparent tension with relativity. Many hold that the only alternative is to abandon 'realism', the view that there is an objective world independent of measurement. We propose instead that Bell correlations are selection artefacts, in tension neither with relativity nor realism.

2026-05-01T04:54:54Z 19 pages, 6 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2602.16985 Huw Price http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21805v2 2026-04-30T17:43:42Z

I show that the clock ambiguity cannot be solved by a purely relational condition like the noninteraction condition, and it is even stronger, extending to evolution laws. The ambiguity is solved by specifying the physical meaning of observables. Page and Wootters (1983) showed how time and dynamics can emerge from entanglement within a stationary quantum system containing a clock. The clock ambiguity problem is that, from a purely relational stance and without fixing a clock-world split, the emergence is ambiguous, resulting in any possible history (Albrecht 1995). I show that the ambiguity is stronger than previously recognized. Under the relational stance, it extends from histories to the evolution laws themselves. The spectrum of any ideal clock uniformizes the spectra of the world's evolution operators, leaving only the dimension of the Hilbert spaces as invariant information. Fixing the clock-world split can solve the ambiguity, but this would block spacetime symmetries. One might want to remove the ambiguity up to a unitary equivalence by imposing noninteraction, as in Marletto and Vedral (2017). But once the clock spectrum uniformizes the world spectrum, unitary equivalence becomes too coarse to distinguish any two possible world dynamics, which is the result proved here. Thus a purely relational condition such as noninteraction is insufficient. Nor can all different decompositions be regarded as equally valid perspectives, since then records would not be correlated with the events they record, and empirical knowledge would be impossible. The resolution is therefore not to embrace the ambiguity, but to recognize what a bare reading of the Page-Wootters structure omits: the physical meaning of the operators.

2026-04-23T16:02:12Z Comments welcome! Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica