https://arxiv.org/api/2l9dpAOPCIx4W8mc5LIlt6XFo1M 2026-06-14T03:35:36Z 5610 285 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11807v1 Provability vs. Execution: A Comment on "Consequences of Undecidability in Physics on the Theory of Everything" 2025-11-14T23:28:48Z Recent work by Faizal et al. (2025) claims that Gödelian undecidability of non-algorithmic truths in our universe imply the impossibility of a formal, algorithmic simulation of the universe. This paper clarifies the distinction between epistemic incompleteness: limits on what can be proven within a formal system, and ontological incompleteness: limits on what can exist or be computed by that system. Using Conway's Game of Life as a Turing-complete example, I demonstrate that undecidability constrains provability but not computability or execution. Unless physical phenomena require the resolution of undecidable propositions, incompleteness alone does not imply a guaranteed failure in execution. Thus, the claim that the universe cannot be simulated lacks empirical and logical justification without evidence of hypercomputation in nature. 2025-11-14T23:28:48Z 3 pages, 0 figures. Comment on arXiv:2507.22950v1 Evan Redden http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07502v2 From Heisenberg and Schrödinger to the P vs. NP Problem 2025-11-13T17:32:57Z This essay offers an epistemological reinterpretation of the foundational divide between matrix mechanics and wave mechanics. Though formally equivalent, the two theories embody distinct modes of knowing: procedural construction and recognitional verification. These epistemic architectures anticipate, in philosophical form, the logical asymmetry expressed by the P versus NP problem in computational complexity. Here, the contrast between efficient generation and efficient recognition is treated not as a mathematical taxonomy but as a framework for understanding how knowledge is produced and validated across physics, computation, and cognition. The essay reconstructs the mathematical history of quantum mechanics through the original derivations of Werner Heisenberg, Max Born, Pascual Jordan, Paul Dirac, Erwin Schrödinger, Paul Ehrenfest, and Wolfgang Pauli, culminating in John von Neumann's unification of both approaches within the formalism of Hilbert space. By juxtaposing Heisenberg's algorithmic formalism with Schrödinger's representational one, it argues that their divergence reveals a structural feature of scientific reasoning itself-the enduring tension between what can be procedurally constructed and what can only be recognized. 2025-11-10T17:06:23Z Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10106v1 Zeno's paradox and black hole information loss problem 2025-11-13T09:11:38Z We develop a conceptual parallel between the black hole information problem and Zeno's paradox, highlighting the role of limiting procedures that turn formally infinite constructions into finite physical observables. Building on the replica--wormhole paradigm, we move beyond unitarity restoration to formulate a quantitative notion of irreversibility in Hawking radiation. Our main result is a modular thermodynamic framework for black-hole evaporation, in which modular entropy, entanglement capacity, and relative entropy assume thermodynamic roles. The monotonicity of relative entropy furnishes a generalized second law that determines the arrow of evolution in replica space. We further resolve the apparent tension between the replica method and the quantum no-cloning theorem by interpreting replicas as ensemble representations rather than physical copies of an unknown state, thereby clarifying the operational meaning of gravitational path integrals. A key message of this work is that non-additivity in Tsallis statistics provides an information-theoretic analogue of the correlations induced by replica wormholes. 2025-11-13T09:11:38Z 20 pages, 1 figure, This manuscript is an English translation and an expanded version of our original paper published in Acta Physica Sinica. Readers are encouraged to consult the original publication for the complete set of results and figures Acta Physica Sinica, 74, 081101 (2025) Xian-Hui Ge http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08450v5 Quantum Logic and Meaning 2025-11-11T09:54:46Z This paper gives a formulation of quantum logic in the abstract algebraic setting laid out by Dunn and Hardegree (2001). On this basis, it provides a comparative analysis of viable quantum logical bivalent semantics and their classical counterparts, thereby showing that the truth-functional status of classical and quantum connectives is not as different as usually thought. Then it points out that bivalent semantics for quantum logic -- compatible with realism about quantum mechanics -- can be maintained, albeit at the price of truth-functionality. Finally, the paper critically addresses Geoffrey Hellman's argument (1980) that this lack of truth-functionality entails a change of meaning between classical and quantum connectives. 2023-04-17T17:18:55Z 30 pages Sebastian Horvat Iulian D. Toader 10.1007/s10992-025-09818-2 http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15615v3 Sufficiency of the counterfactual account of Lüders' rule to rule out ontological models of quantum mechanics 2025-11-10T17:54:44Z Ontological models, as used in the generalised contextuality literature, play a central role in current research on quantum foundations, providing a framework for defining classicality, constructing classical analogues of key quantum phenomena, and examining the ontology of quantum states. In this work, we show that a counterfactual account of Lüders' rule -- which we argue is naturally implied by the mathematical structure of the rule itself -- renders such models inherently incompatible with the quantum formalism. This incompatibility arises because the counterfactual update requires ontological models to update their states according to conditional probability, which in turn which in turn renders predictions of sequential measurements order-independent. This implies that ontological models, even contextual ones, must either act differently to what we would expect given (this, typically implicitly-assumed account of) quantum state update rule, or cannot model quantum behaviour. 2025-02-21T17:38:23Z 21+10 pages, 0 figures. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. A, matches accepted version Phys. Rev. A 112, 052208 (2025) Alisson Tezzin Bárbara Amaral Jonte R. Hance 10.1103/65zd-1lys http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06444v1 Alexander Dalgarno and the development of astrochemistry 2025-11-09T16:25:42Z The interdisciplinary field of astrochemistry arose during the 1970s as observations in previously unexplored parts of the electromagnetic spectrum began to reveal the extent of a molecular component of interstellar matter with a surprisingly rich chemistry. Astrochemistry expanded further in order to explain the role of atomic and molecular processes in a broad range of phenomena in the universe. It is instructive to describe the current scope of astrochemistry using the career and accomplishments of Alexander Dalgarno as an organizing principle. Dalgarno helped to establish a self-sustaining community of astrochemists around the world. His own research interests highlight the early development of astrochemistry and anticipate much of its later evolution. His theoretical investigations of fundamental atomic and molecular processes lie at the heart of the subject. 2025-11-09T16:25:42Z 27 pages. This article was prepared to accompany a talk at a meeting on the History of Astrochemistry organized by the Historical Group of the Royal Society of Chemistry, Burlington House, London, 2025 October 16 John H. Black http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07476v1 A Four-Level Ontological Framework for Quantum Field Theory: From Quantum Vacuum to Phenomenal Reality 2025-11-08T21:02:11Z One of the foundational challenges in both Quantum Field Theory and the philosophy of physics lies in the traditional binary classification of entities as either real or unreal. The classical view posits that material entities are real, while mental constructs or theoretical entities are unreal. However, quantum phenomena such as virtual particles challenge this simplistic dichotomy. These unobservable entities, by influencing measurable phenomena, raise profound questions about the nature and modes of existence. To address this, we propose a four-level ontological hierarchy that spans from the quantum vacuum and the virtual level to the quantum level and phenomenal reality, providing a coherent continuum from potentiality to actualization. This framework not only clarifies the interpretation of quantum theory but also offers a unified perspective linking the unobservable with the observable. In QFT, virtual particles play a crucial role in mediating forces and in correcting the measurable properties of real particles. They arise within the mathematical structure of Feynman diagrams and, despite being unobservable, produce real, measurable effects such as the Lamb shift and the Casimir effect. Philosophically, this raises deep ontological questions: if unobservable entities affect measurable phenomena, can they truly be dismissed as unreal? Conversely, if they are real, what mode of existence do they possess? The traditional dichotomy of real versus unreal is thus insufficient for interpreting the ontological implications of quantum processes. To overcome these limitations, we propose a four-level ontological hierarchy. 2025-11-08T21:02:11Z Ali Reza Mirzaee Mirza http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06112v1 A computational framework for evaluating an edge-integrated, multi-ramp construction model of the Great Pyramid of Giza 2025-11-08T19:35:13Z Despite decades of study, a quantitative, integrated framework to evaluate minutescale throughput, geometric control, and a zero external footprint for Khufu's pyramid has been lacking. We test the Integrated Edge-Ramp (IER) model-a helical path formed by omitting and backfilling perimeter courses-using a unified, end-to-end pipeline coupling parametric geometry, discrete-event logistics, and staged finite-element analysis (FEA). An adaptive multiramp strategy can sustain 4-6-minute dispatches and yields a median on-site duration of 13.8-20.6 years (95% CI); including quarrying, river transport, and seasonal pauses gives 20-27 years. FEA indicates that stresses and settlements remain within plausible limits for Old Kingdom limestone under self-weight. The model's geometry is also consistent with internal voids identified by muon imaging (a hypothesis-generating result). The IER helps reconcile throughput, survey access, and zero-footprint closure, and produces falsifiable predictions (edge-fill signatures, corner wear). Our study provides a transferable, open-data/code framework for testing construction hypotheses for ancient megastructures. 2025-11-08T19:35:13Z How could Khufu's pyramid be built without external ramps? This open and reproducible framework provides a quantitative answer by testing an edge-integrated, multi-ramp construction model (preprint under peer review at npj Heritage Science, Nature Portfolio) Vicente Luis Rosell Roig 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7331924/v1 http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06043v1 Quantum-Like Correlations from Local Hidden-Variable Theories Under Conservation Law 2025-11-08T15:32:13Z The precision with which we can measure operators that do not commute with conserved quantities is limited by the need to preserve the associated global symmetries. We show how to construct a local hidden-variable model that violates Bell inequalities by interpreting this measurement error as altering the measure space of the hidden variables. This provides a physically-motivated example of a supermeasured model, where the statistical independence assumption used to form Bell inequalities is violated without there being a causal dependence of the measurement settings on the hidden variables (superdeterminism) or a causal dependence of the hidden variables on the measurement settings (retrocausality). The model also gives subtly different predictions to quantum mechanics, that could be tested experimentally. 2025-11-08T15:32:13Z 6 pages, 1 figure Alejandro J. Garza Jonte R. Hance http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22726v2 Comments on Weinstein's comments arXiv: 2509.09361 & 2510.03793 2025-11-06T14:28:25Z In 2024, after thirty years of research on this subject, I published a book entitled: \textit{Poincaré, Einstein and the discovery of special relativity. An end to the controversy} \cite{Ginoux2024}. In September 2025, Galina Weinstein published a review of this book entitled: \textit{Convergences and Divergences: Einstein Poincaré and Special Relativity} (arXiv:2509.09361) in which she harshly criticized my work in an unfair and error filled manner. The, she published a second comment (arXiv: 2510.03793) in which she added she added insults about me to all her mistakes, falsehoods and misleading criticisms. So I've decided to reply to her comments, in an academic way (as she would normally have done), in order to demonstrate that her allegedly ``novel way'' of reconstructing the history of the theory of special relativity is purely based on her own interpretation of the facts and not on the facts themselves. To this aim, I will follow the structure of each Weinstein's comment (arXiv: 2509.09361 \& 2510.03793) and I will highlight section by section all the erroneous things she has reported and repeated. 2025-09-25T06:12:17Z Comment on 2509.09361 & 2510.03793 Jean-Marc Ginoux http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03982v1 Legal Entanglement 2025-11-06T02:13:03Z Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon in which two physical systems are correlated in such a way that they appear to instantaneously affect one another, regardless of the distance between them. As commonly understood, Bell's Theorem famously demonstrates that any causal explanation of entanglement must discard either locality (the principle that nothing, including information, travels faster than light) or classical notions of realism (or both). Drawing on this concept, several legal scholars have metaphorically described 'entangled' legal concepts. For instance, if a state's highest court redefines the concept of 'foreseeability' in negligence law, this redefinition alters the concept of 'reasonable care' immediately in the eyes of the law. Godfrey (2024) is the first work to mathematically model entangled legal concepts, particularly in the context of legal interpretation. Here, we extend the quantification to the formulation and delineation of law (lawmaking) and the adjudication of law (judgment). In so doing, we connect legal entanglement to Sichelman's (2022) work on legal entropy, complexity, and the informational content of law. In addition to quantifying entanglement across various legal contexts, our approach provides broader insights. For example, it offers a more comprehensive analysis of the uses and limits of 'modularity' in law--specifically, the role legal boundaries (spatial or intangible) play in reducing information costs within legal systems. Moreover, we discuss how our model can improve theories of legal artificial intelligence. Finally, we explore the application of legal theory back to physics. If quantum physical entanglement operates analogously to legal entanglement, it requires discarding both locality and classical realism, though not in the manner commonly imagined. 2025-11-06T02:13:03Z Nicholas Godfrey Ted Sichelman http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01800v5 The Newtonian limit of orthonormal frames in metric theories of gravity 2025-11-04T11:13:19Z We extend well-known results on the Newtonian limit of Lorentzian metrics to orthonormal frames. Concretely, we prove that, given a one-parameter family of Lorentzian metrics that in the Newtonian limit converges to a Galilei structure, any family of orthonormal frames for these metrics converges pointwise to a Galilei frame, assuming that the two obvious necessary conditions are satisfied: the spatial frame must not rotate indefinitely as the limit is approached, and the frame's boost velocity with respect to some fixed reference observer needs to converge. 2024-10-02T17:56:57Z 12.5+3+1.5 pages (main text + references + appendix), to appear in General Relativity and Gravitation. v2: reference updated. v3: extended results, added references. v4: extended results. v5: corrected lemma General Relativity and Gravitation 57, 166 (2025) Philip K. Schwartz Arian L. von Blanckenburg 10.1007/s10714-025-03490-2 http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08548v3 Emergence: from physics to biology, sociology, and computer science 2025-11-04T09:51:41Z Many systems involve numerous interacting parts and the whole system can have properties that the individual parts do not. I take this novelty as the defining characteristic of an emergent property. Other characteristics associated with emergence discussed include universality, order, complexity, unpredictability, irreducibility, diversity, self-organisation, discontinuities, and singularities. Emergent phenomena are widespread across physics, biology, social sciences, and computing, and are central to major scientific and societal challenges. Understanding emergence involves considering the stratification of reality across different scales (energy, time, length, complexity), each with its distinct ontology and epistemology, leading to semi-autonomous scientific disciplines. A central challenge is bridging the gap between macroscopic emergent properties and microscopic component interactions. Identifying an intermediate mesoscopic scale where new, weakly interacting entities or modular structures emerge is key. Theoretical approaches, such as effective theories (describing phenomena at a specific scale) and toy models (simplified systems for analysis), are vital. The Ising model exemplifies how toy models can elucidate emergence characteristics. Emergence is central to condensed matter physics, chaotic systems, fluid dynamics, nuclear physics, quantum gravity, neural networks, protein folding, and social segregation. An emergent perspective should influence scientific strategy by shaping research questions, methodologies, priorities, and resource allocation. An elusive goal is the design and control of emergent properties. 2025-08-12T01:24:17Z 163 pages, 415 references. Revised version has Table of Contents, minor corrections and additions Ross H. McKenzie http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06362v2 Where Photons Have Been: Nowhere Without All Components of Their Wavefunctions 2025-11-02T01:52:13Z A nested interferometer experiment by Danan et al (2013) is discussed and some claims evaluated concerning the whereabouts of the photon, primarily in the context of time-symmetric interpretations of quantum theory including the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF) and the Transactional Interpretation (TI). It is pointed out that the TSVF account fails to predict the observed data based only on the first-order wavefunction component. It is shown that the Transactional Interpretation readily accounts for all the observed phenomena. 2025-07-08T19:54:25Z Final accepted version for Entropy (special issue on quantum measurement) R. E. Kastner http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02412v2 Comment on Marek Czachor article entitled "On Relativity of Quantumness as Implied by Relativity of Arithmetic and Probability" 2025-10-29T14:15:03Z Czachor's model of hierarchical arithmetics begins with a valid formal premise but fixes the key probability mapping g by importing the Born rule and Fubini-Study metric from standard quantum mechanics, where Born probabilities are Kolmogorov within a fixed measurement context. This g is then applied in a non-Newtonian hidden-variable setting, producing a hybrid framework whose agreement with quantum correlations is built in by design, not derived from new physics, and thus does not constitute a genuine counterexample to Bell's theorem 2025-10-02T10:52:48Z 8 pages, 1 figure, 12 equations and 6 references. Comment on arXiv:2510.00637. v2 typos fixed Krzysztof Sienicki Mikołaj Sienicki