https://arxiv.org/api/e7AUpetz/U95wU0+nA3zGjqa5cY 2026-06-14T00:42:37Z 5610 240 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03184v3 2025-12-17T15:41:28Z

We revisit the status of quantum probabilities in light of Kolmogorovian Censorship (KC) and the Contexts, Systems and Modalities (CSM) framework, and we compare KC-based frameworks with alternatives such as superdeterminism, supermeasurements, and predictive incompleteness. After briefly recalling the technical content of KC and its scope, we show that KC correctly identifies that probabilities are classical within a fixed measurement context but does not by itself remove the conceptual tension that motivates nonlocal or conspiratorial explanations of Bell-inequality violations. We argue that predictive incompleteness - the view that the quantum state is operationally incomplete until the measurement context is specified - provides a simple, minimal, and explanatory framework that preserves relativistic locality while matching experimental practice. Finally we clarify logical relations among these positions, highlight the assumptions behind them, and justify the move from Kolmogorov's to Gleason's framework for quantum probabilities.

2024-05-06T06:20:54Z 7 pages, no figure. In v2 some clarifications and discussions have been added. In v3 the paper has been refurbished and expanded Philippe Grangier http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08715v2 2025-12-17T15:35:45Z

We argue that special and general theories of relativity implicitly assume spacetime events correspond to quantum measurement outcomes. This leads to a change in how one should view the equivalence of spacetime and gravity. We describe a Bell test using time-like measurements that indicates a non classical causal structure that does not violate no-signaling. From this perspective, the violation of the Bell inequalities are already evidence for the non classical structure of flat spacetime as seen by an agent embedded in it. We argue that spacetime geometry can be learned by an embedded agent with internal actuators and sensors making internal measurements.

2025-03-10T12:03:13Z To appear in the proceedings of "Quantum Gravity and Computation", Routledge Series on Philosophy of Physics and Mathematics. Revised version G. J. Milburn http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09567v6 2025-12-16T18:42:05Z

What is information, physically, and why does it so reliably emerge in living, cultural, and technological systems? Existing theories quantify uncertainty, cost, or compressibility, but do not identify which physical structures count as information or how informational entities arise from dynamics. Here we introduce a causal-physical framework that defines information as a heritable causal role played by persistent (metastable) structures in a dynamical system. We represent long-lived structures as almost-invariant sets and assemble them into causal structure sets that encode how such structures generate, transform, and maintain one another. Within this representation, informational entities are singled out by three generative motifs: replication, heritable variation, and translation under shared templates, which together define when a collection of structures constitutes an information family. We demonstrate the full pipeline by mapping a concrete cultural episode (fruit-salad recipe sharing and modification) into a causal structure set, and show how the motifs and information families can then be identified algorithmically. The framework yields computable quantities, including informational fitness and informational entropy, directly from causal structure, enabling informational variants to be detected, compared, and tracked across biological, cultural, engineered, and digital domains. Finally, motivated by analogies to random directed graphs and catalytic networks, we propose testable conditions under which hereditary informational motifs become statistically generic in sufficiently large causal-physical systems.

2024-07-06T16:37:01Z - Wouter van der Wijngaart http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14315v1 2025-12-16T11:32:39Z

Interpretation is not the only way to explain a theory's success, form and features, and nor is it the only way to solve problems we see with a theory. This can also be done by giving a reductive explanation of the theory, by reference to a newer, more accurate, and/or more fundamental theory. We are seeking a theory of quantum gravity, a more fundamental theory than both quantum mechanics and general relativity, yet, while this theory is supposed to explain general relativity, it's not typically been thought to be necessary, or able, to explain quantum mechanics -- a task instead assigned to interpretation. Here, I question why this is. I also present a new way of assessing the various interpretations of quantum mechanics, in terms of their heuristic and unificatory potential in helping us find a more fundamental theory.

2025-12-16T11:32:39Z An edited version is to appear in: How to Understand Quantum Mechanics - 100 Years of Ongoing Interpretation, edited by Lars-Göran Johansson and Jan Faye Karen Crowther http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14122v1 2025-12-16T06:08:27Z

QBism pursues the real by first eliminating the elements of quantum theory too fragile to be ontologies on their own. Thereafter, it seeks an "ontological lesson" from whatever remains. Here, we explore this program by highlighting three tenets of QBism. First, the Born Rule is a normative statement. It is about the decision-making behavior any individual agent should strive for, not a descriptive "law of nature." Second, all probabilities, including all quantum probabilities, are so subjective they never tell nature what to do. This includes probability-1 assignments. Quantum states thus have no "ontic hold" on the world, which implies a more radical kind of indeterminism in quantum theory than other interpretations understand. Third, quantum measurement outcomes just are personal experiences for the agent gambling upon them. Thus all quantum measurement outcomes are local in the sense of the agent enacting them. Through these tenets, we explain four points better than previously: 1) how QBism contrasts with Bohr's concern over unambiguous language, 2) how QBism contrasts with the Everett interpretation, 3) how QBism understands the meaning of Bell inequality violations, and 4) how QBism responds to Wigner's "suspended animation" argument. Finally, we consider the ontological lesson of the tenets and ask what it might mean for the next one hundred years of quantum theory and humankind more generally.

2025-12-16T06:08:27Z 22 pages, 2 figures; chapter accepted for forthcoming quantum-centennial book; contains passages condensed from arXiv:1705.03483 and arXiv:2303.01446 for a less overspecialized audience, with a healthy proportion of new material Christopher A. Fuchs Blake C. Stacey http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13463v1 2025-12-15T16:02:56Z

Einstein's distinction between principle theories and constructive theories is methodological rather than metaphysical. Principle theories such as thermodynamics and relativity articulate empirically distilled constraints that delimit admissible microphysical models, while constructive theories remain provisional and revisable. This paper reconstructs Einstein's framework from primary sources and argues that recent appeals to it by Meir Hemmo and Orly Shenker (under the banner of "Flat Physicalism") invert its functional hierarchy. What is presented as an Einsteinian template instead supports a reductionist metaphysics foreign to Einstein's methodology and increasingly misaligned with the structural commitments of contemporary physics.

2025-12-15T16:02:56Z Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13277v1 2025-12-15T12:37:55Z

Connections between novae with shells and historical observations are crucial for astrophysical understanding of long-term evolution of shells and cataclysmic variables. Three of five previously considered links are revisited here: extended features in M22 in BC48, Te-11 in 483, and AT Cnc in 1645. We aim to develop a procedure to check whether these links are credible. Literal translations of the Chinese texts, historically based arguments, and close readings are combined with astrophysics, (peak brightness, decay time estimate, shell age expansion model calculation, etc.). (a) Nandou's second star, near which the BC48 `guest star' was reported, is identified as tau Sgr, not lambda Sgr, far from the M22 location. A nova in M22 would peak at only m=6.4 \pm 1.4 mag, and thus a description as a `blue-white' `melon' does not fit; it was likely a comet. (b) The imprecise position (`Shen['s] east') of the `guest star' in 483, its extended (dipper-like) radiance, and the context speak for a bolide. Considering the new (larger) Gaia distance and small extinction towards Te-11 (outside a cloud), its bi-polar morphology and current expansion velocity point to a planetary nebula; as a nova, the shell expansion age is 1100-2000 yr from detailed supersonic expansion calculations. (c) Most certainly, Mars was meant when the source for 1645 reported `a large star entered Yugui'; the verb implies motion. AT Cnc lies neither in Yugui's asterism box nor in the eponymous lunar mansion range. The fluid drag expansion age of AT Cancri's ejecta is 128-631 yr. All three exact ages are unsubstantiated. True novae or nova shells can be connected to historical records only if the position and object type are plausible. Duration, brightness (light curve), and color (evolution) should fit and could provide more astrophysical insight ...

2025-12-15T12:37:55Z 13 pages with 2 tables and 7 figures (appeared in A&A) A&A 704, A251 (2025) D. L. Neuhäuser U Jena R. Neuhäuser U Jena V. Hambaryan U Jena J. Chapman Society for the Study of Early China M. Della Valle INAF Napoli 10.1051/0004-6361/202554643 http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11019v1 2025-12-11T18:42:24Z

This article offers a portrait of the DELPHI experiment at CERN's Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP) through the scientific life and leadership of Ugo Amaldi. It traces how DELPHI contributed to LEP's physics program, from precision studies at the Z pole to higher-energy running with W-pair production and increasingly ambitious Higgs searches. Along the way, it highlights Ugo Amaldi's technical and organizational innovations, especially his insistence on bold detector choices and his sustained support for young physicists and collaborative leadership. The article also recalls Ugo's influential work on the unification of forces and shows how DELPHI's technologies, software, governance structures, and data-sharing practices anticipated many features of later collider experiments and of contemporary science policy. In this sense, DELPHI's legacy is not only foundational for today's particle physics, but also a lasting and formative element of modern scientific culture.

2025-12-11T18:42:24Z Contribution to Symposium to celebrate Ugo Amaldi's 90th birthday, CERN, April 2025. To be published in Atti dell'Accademia del XL Alessandro De Angelis http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10775v1 2025-12-11T16:11:47Z

In this paper we analyse scalar-tensor theories-specific instances of which include mainstream inflation and dark energy models-in light of the spacetime-matter dichotomy. We argue that it is difficult to categorise the scalar fields as either a pure aspect of the spacetime structure or a pure form of matter, by focusing on the Jordan vs Einstein frames of these theories. We present and evaluate various interpretational options available, concluding that the spacetime-matter dichotomy becomes untenable in this context. At the same time, the ontological and conceptual category of spacetime can be decoupled from that of gravity, with the latter remaining viable in the context of scalar-tensor theories.

2025-12-11T16:11:47Z Antonio Ferreiro Alex Fleuren Niels C. M. Martens http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04128v2 2025-12-11T08:16:53Z

Before we discuss the deflection of light in a gravitational field, we give a brief overview of some basic physical formulas on photon properties, generation and propagation. The much debated problems of the redshift and the photon propagation in a gravitational field is then considered and applied to the calculation of the speed of light. Many citations are given in direct quotations to avoid any misunderstandings. If the quotations are in German, an English translation is provided. Based on this speed, calculated and measured results are recalled on the deflection of light, with emphasis on the deflection near the Sun. We conclude that the speed of light and the deflection angle can be determined by energy and momentum conservation principles.

2025-12-03T03:33:55Z 20 pages; Version 2 Klaus Wilhelm Bhola N. Dwivedi Karsten Muller http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01803v3 2025-12-10T12:15:01Z

We show that the arrow of time is intimately related to the geometry and topology of the whole universe, and is therefore best understood as a cosmological phenomenon.

2025-08-03T15:39:04Z Several clarifications. Included a brief discussion on singularity theorems in the Lambda>0 case Andrea Palessandro http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05129v2 2025-12-08T06:36:55Z

The relationship between the vanishing of the heat capacities as $T\to0^+$ and the thermal stability is examined. The heat capacities vanish as fast as or faster than $T$ as $T\to0^+$ for states at the phase space boundary ($T=0$) to sustain the standard thermal stability criterion $U_{ss}>0$. Conversely, weakly vanishing heat capacities, which signify a loss of curvature in $U(S)$ at $T=0$, are the signature of a critical condition precisely at $T=0$, as exemplified in marginal Fermi liquids. Therefore, the vanishing of the specific heat should be viewed not as a new law but as a confirmatory result of the existing framework of thermodynamics.

2025-11-24T08:39:51Z 4pages, 1figure, 1500 words in text, version in Spanish available elsewhere Physica Scripta 2025 100 125206 Martín-Olalla José María 10.1088/1402-4896/ae22a5 http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07101v1 2025-12-08T02:31:57Z

This article suggests that thinking about the role of reference frames can provide new insight into Extended Wigner's Friend scenarios. This involves appealing to symmetries to make a principled distinction between properties of a system which are meaningful only relative to an external reference system and properties which are meaningful without further relativization. Thus we may propose that there are always well-defined facts about what observers have observed, but there are not necessarily well-defined facts about the relations between their reference frames, so there will not always exist a joint distribution over their outcomes which can meaningfully be compared to the predictions of quantum mechanics. In addition, this approach also offers a general argument against the idea that there should be a regress of relativization.

2025-12-08T02:31:57Z Emily Adlam http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07027v1 2025-12-07T22:41:47Z

The fine-structure constant alpha approximately 1/137 is traditionally regarded as a fundamental dimensionless parameter. I argue instead that alpha is a scaled quantity that arises only where the structural scales contributed by classical electromagnetism (e), quantum mechanics (h-bar), and special relativity (c) intersect. None of these theories, taken individually, supplies the independent scales required to define alpha. The constant first appears when relativistic corrections are added to the Schrodinger-Bohr description of hydrogen (Sommerfeld), and it becomes the structural coupling in quantum electrodynamics, where quantum and relativistic effects modify the classical electromagnetic interaction. Expressing the governing laws in canonical form reveals this dependence and eliminates representational artifacts that make alpha appear fundamental. The running of alpha in QED further demonstrates its status as a scale-dependent coupling rather than a universal constant. I conclude that alpha is a domain-specific structural ratio reflecting contingent relationships among independent physical scales.

2025-12-07T22:41:47Z Harry Sticker http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06543v1 2025-12-06T19:30:26Z

We are interested in a result found in the thesis of the astronomer Alexandre Véronnet (1876-1951) : "Precession of a fluid ring rotating along a parallel axis. Zone of maximum crustal compression at 35$^\circ$. A cause of earthquakes". In 1912, Alexandre Véronnet hypothesizes that the Earth's rotation influences the occurrence of earthquakes in the 35th parallel zone. Has this hypothesis been taken up by other authors, geophysicists, seismologists, etc.? Has it been confirmed or refuted? What is the literature on this subject? Our aim is not to draw a conclusion on this hypothesis but to examine the dissemination of a scientific result.

2025-12-06T19:30:26Z working document, version 1 Hervé Le Ferrand