https://arxiv.org/api/2r5Hoyli2XpBoLMQOSW/yN/LFCE 2026-06-13T21:00:58Z 5610 195 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05681v2 2026-01-16T16:36:12Z

Determinism is (roughly) the thesis that the past determines the future. But efforts to define it precisely have exposed deep methodological disagreements. Standard possible-worlds formulations of determinism presuppose an "agreement" relation between worlds,but this relation can be understood in multiple ways, none of which is particularly clear. We critically examine the proliferation of definitions of determinism in the recent literature, arguing that these definitions fail to deliver clear verdicts about actual scientific theories. We advocate a return to a formal approach, in the logical tradition of Carnap, that treats determinism as a property of scientific theories, rather than an elusive metaphysical doctrine. We highlight two key distinctions: (1) the difference between qualitative and "full" determinism, as emphasized in recent discussions of physics and metaphysics, and (2) the distinction between weak and strong formal conditions on the uniqueness of world extensions. We argue that defining determinism in terms of metaphysical notions such as haecceities is unhelpful, whereas rigorous formal criteria such as Belot's D1 and D3 offer a tractable and scientifically relevant account. By clarifying what it means for a theory to be deterministic, we set the stage for a fruitful interaction between physics and metaphysics.

2025-03-07T18:43:45Z 46 pages Hans Halvorson JB Manchak James Owen Weatherall http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306079v2 2026-01-16T11:15:37Z

The paper presents shortly the geometric approach to the problem of a general quantization formalism, both physically meaningful and mathematically consistent.

2003-06-10T16:15:20Z 8 pages, replaced to improve notation Rom.Rep.Phys. 45 (1993) 645 Marius Grigorescu http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11671v1 2026-01-16T03:14:55Z

This is an editorial article based on the reseaches on the Ising model over the last 100 years.

2026-01-16T03:14:55Z 8 pages Eur. Phys. J. B 99 (2026) 16 Muktish Acharyya Yurij Holovatch Ferenc Igloi 10.1140/epjb/s10051-026-01129-y http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09996v1 2026-01-15T02:16:34Z

One of the most public episodes of gatekeeping in modern science was the case of so-called 'cold fusion'. At a news conference in 1989 the electrochemists Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons announced that they had found evidence of nuclear fusion in palladium electrodes loaded with deuterium. There was worldwide interest. Many groups sought to reproduce the results, most unsuccessfully. Within months, the prevailing view became strongly negative. The claims of Fleischmann and Pons came to be regarded as disreputable, as well as false. As the Caltech physicist David Goldstein put it, cold fusion became 'a pariah field, cast out by the scientific establishment' (Goldstein 1994). The case would already be interesting for students of gatekeeping if the story had ended at that point. Even more interestingly, however, the field survived and persisted. It has been enjoying a modest renaissance, with recent government funding both in the US and the EU. This piece offers an opinionated introduction to cold fusion as a case study of scientific gatekeeping, discussing both its early and recent history

2026-01-15T02:16:34Z 43 pages, no figures Jonah F Messinger Florian Metzler Huw Price http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09899v1 2026-01-14T22:13:58Z

Mathematical and astronomical achievements of the Islamic World during its golden era are briefly exposed. Thie article is based on the invited talk delivered remotely at the ICRANet-Isfahan Astronomical meeting, November 2-5, 2021, which, in turn, reproduces major parts of one of the chapters of my book ``Our Celestial Clockwork'', published recently (2021) by the World Scientific.

2026-01-14T22:13:58Z The illustrated text appeared in the Proceedings of the ICRANet-Isfahan Astronomical Meeting held in Isfahan, Iran, form Nov. 2 till 5, 2021, published by Cambridge Scientific Publishers in 2021, pp. 41-62 ISBN 978-I-908106-88-9 (2024) Richard Kerner http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09759v1 2026-01-14T02:59:26Z

The observation of magnetism in atomically thin van der Waals (vdW) antiferromagnets (FePS$_3$, NiPS$_3$, and MnPS$_3$) in 2016 marked an important moment in the development of two-dimensional (2D) physics. In this personal reflection, I describe how a simple question, posed in the early 2010s, motivated experimental efforts that culminated in the demonstration of antiferromagnetic order in monolayer FePS$_3$. Alongside subsequent reports of vdW ferromagnets in 2017, these developments helped establish intrinsic magnetism as a viable degree of freedom in atomically thin materials. I close with personal lessons drawn from this period and a perspective on the opportunities that now shape the field's second decade and beyond.

2026-01-14T02:59:26Z J. Phys. Condens. Matter (in press) Je-Geun Park 10.1088/1361-648X/ae35b8 http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19672v2 2026-01-13T19:24:02Z

Free will discourse is primarily centred around the thesis of determinism. Much of the literature takes determinism as its starting premise, assuming it true for the sake of discussion, and then proceeds to present arguments for why, if determinism is true, free will would be either possible or impossible. This is reflected in the theoretical terrain of the debate, with the primary distinction currently being between compatibilists and incompatibilists and not, as one might expect, between free will realists and skeptics. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we argue that there is no reason to accept such a framing. We show that, on the basis of modern physics, there is no good evidence that physical determinism of any variety provides an accurate description of our universe and lots of evidence against such a view. Moreover, we show that this analysis extends equally to the sort of indeterministic worldviews endorsed by many libertarian philosophers and their skeptics, a worldview which we refer to as determinism plus randomness. The papers secondary aim is therefore to present an alternative conception of indeterminism, which is more in line with the empirical evidence from physics. It is this indeterministic worldview, we suggest, that ought to be the central focus of a reframed philosophy of free will.

2025-03-25T13:59:18Z Henry D. Potter George F. R. Ellis Kevin J. Mitchell http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07932v1 2026-01-12T19:01:58Z

Since its inception, Bohmian mechanics has been surrounded by a halo of controversy. Originally proposed to bypass the limitations imposed by von Neumann's theorem on the impossibility of hidden-variable models in quantum mechanics, it faced strong opposition from the outset. Over time, however, its use in tackling specific problems across various branches of physics has led to a gradual shift in attitude, turning the early resistance into a more moderate acceptance. A plausible explanation for this change may be that, since the late 1990s and early 2000s, Bohmian mechanics has been taking on a more operational and practical role. The original hidden-variable idea has gradually faded from its framework, giving way to a more pragmatic approach that treats it as a suitable analytical and computational tool. This discussion explores how and why such a shift in perspective has occurred and, therefore, answers questions such as whether Bohmian mechanics should be considered once and for all a legitimate quantum representation (i.e., worth being taught in elementary quantum mechanics courses) or, by extension, whether these ideas can be transferred to and benefit other fields. Here, the Schrödinger equation and several specific numerical examples are re-examined in the light of a less restrictive view than the standard one usually adopted in quantum mechanics.

2026-01-12T19:01:58Z 22 pages, 6 figures; based on the talk given at the Basil Hiley Memorial Symposium (UCL, June 30, 2025) J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 3189, 012011 (2026) A. S. Sanz 10.1088/1742-6596/3189/1/012011 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07437v1 2026-01-12T11:26:06Z

We consider a stationary quantum system consisting of two non-interacting yet entangled subsystems, $Ξ$ and $Γ$. We identify a quantum theory characterizing $Ξ$ such that, in the quantum-to-classical crossover of the composite system, $Γ$ behaves as a test particle within the gravitational field of a Schwarzschild Black Hole (SBH) near its event horizon. We then show that this same quantum theory naturally provides a representation of $Ξ$ in terms of bosonic modes, whose features match those of the Hawking radiation; this facilitates the establishment of precise relations between the phenomenological parameters of the SBH and the microscopic details of the quantum model for $Ξ$. Finally, we recognize that the conditions used to characterize $Γ$ and $Ξ$ coincide with those required by the Page and Wootters mechanism for identifying an evolving system and an associated clock. This leads us to discuss how the quantum model for $Ξ$ endows the SBH with all the characteristics of a "perfect" clock.

2026-01-12T11:26:06Z Alessandro Coppo Nicola Pranzini Paola Verrucchi http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08753v2 2026-01-11T19:33:18Z

We show that heat defines a gauge connection on a line bundle over work configurations. Vanishing curvature is equivalent to the local existence of entropy and temperature functions such that heat can be expressed as $TdS$. A conjecture of Jauch, that entropy and temperature arise from a conservation law, is shown to follow as a special case. Global equilibrium may nevertheless fail in the presence of a thermal analogue of geometric phase.

2025-03-11T14:22:32Z 5 pages Bryan W Roberts http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06618v1 2026-01-10T16:50:06Z

This chapter reexamines wave function realism (WFR) through the lens of phenomenology. We begin by situating WFR within the broader debate about the ontology of the quantum state and the temptation to "read off" metaphysics from mathematical formalism. Against this background, we turn to the London-Bauer interpretation (LBI), the most explicit attempt to interpret quantum mechanics through phenomenological categories. On this view, the measurement transition is not a physical discontinuity but a reflective articulation of objectivity, and the wave function formally encodes the horizonal structure of world-givenness. We develop this idea by reconfiguring the notion of realism itself: not as objectivist, but as correlational and transcendental. The resulting picture suggests that quantum mechanics, rather than depicting a world "minus observers," mathematically articulates the very correlation through which a world becomes manifest at all.

2026-01-10T16:50:06Z Philipp Berghofer Harald A. Wiltsche http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06592v1 2026-01-10T15:03:37Z

The current standard model of cosmology assumes that the majority of matter in the Universe is made of dark matter, and that the latter is fundamentally different from ordinary matter. Dark matter can in principle explain the rotation of galaxies, the gravitational lensing from galaxy clusters or the appearance of the cosmic microwave background, the oldest light in the Universe. But does dark matter really exist? Here, we review the history of this concept and its implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies. We also consider the questions that remain, the limitations of the model, and present alternative theories, in particular modifications to the gravitional law that would -- perhaps -- make it possible to do without it.

2026-01-10T15:03:37Z 42 pages, in French. Chapter of the book "Connaitre le cosmos : enjeux philosophiques et scientifiques", editors Julien Bernard & Simon Beyne, Spartacus-Idh, collection Nouvelle Vision des Sciences, pp. 333-364, 2025. ISBN: 978-2-36693-146-4. http://spartacus-idh.com/fr/nouvelles-visions-des-sciences/146-146.html in "Connaitre le cosmos : enjeux philosophiques et scientifiques", editors Julien Bernard & Simon Beyne, Spartacus-Idh, 2025, pp.333-364 Benoit Famaey Jonathan Freundlich http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22540v2 2026-01-10T06:47:50Z

This paper argues that the traditional opposition between determinism and indeterminism in physics is representational rather than ontological. Deterministic-stochastic dualities are available in principle, and arise in a non-contrived way in many scientifically important models. When dynamical systems admit mathematically equivalent deterministic and stochastic formulations, their observable predictions depend only on the induced structure of correlations between preparations and measurement outcomes. I use this model-equivalence to motivate a model-invariance criterion for ontological commitment, according to which only structural features that remain stable across empirically equivalent representations, and whose physical effects are invariant under such reformulations, are candidates for realism. This yields a fallibilist form of structural realism grounded in modal robustness rather than in the specifics of any given mathematical representation. Features such as conservation laws, symmetries, and causal or metric structure satisfy this criterion and can be encoded in observable relations in mathematically intelligible ways. By contrast, the localisation of modal selection -- whether in initial conditions, stochastic outcomes, or informational collapse mechanisms -- is not invariant under empirically equivalent reformulations and is therefore best understood as a gauge choice rather than an ontological feature. The resulting framework explains how certain long-standing problems in the foundations of physics, including the measurement problem and the perceived conflict between physical determinism and free agency, arise from the reification of representational artefacts. By distinguishing model-invariant structure from modelling conventions, I offer a realist ontology for modern physics that combines empirical openness with resistance to metaphysical overreach.

2025-12-27T09:41:03Z 32 pages. V2 missing references added, small clarifications in quantum foundations section David Nolland http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06312v1 2026-01-09T21:02:13Z

This paper diagnoses a much-discussed problem in quantum thermodynamics, that of generalizing classical work into the quantum domain. I begin with the no-go theorem of Perarnau-Llobet et al (2017): no universal measurement scheme for quantum work satisfies two intuitive, classically consilient desiderata. I assess this incompatibility as stemming from the measurement problem. Decoherence restores compatibility for all practical purposes, but raises questions about what 'universality' should mean and whether any measurement scheme can be 'universal'. I consider a different standard of universality -- in terms of ontology -- by defining a trajectory-based notion of quantum work using the quantum potential. While this preserves the classical role of work as the integral of forces over distances, and evades the tension of the no-go theorem, consilience fails elsewhere; no single quantum work concept seems capable of preserving all classical features, raising questions for what it takes for successful generalization of the work concept to quantum thermodynamics.

2026-01-09T21:02:13Z Preprint of Jan 10, 2026. Accepted at the British Journal for Philosophy of Science. Please cite published version when available Eugene Y. S. Chua http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04951v4 2026-01-09T11:41:05Z

The term emergence is increasingly used across scientific disciplines to describe phenomena that arise from interactions among a system's components but cannot be readily inferred by examining those components in isolation. While often invoked to explain higher-level behaviors, such as flocking, synchronization, or collective intelligence, the term is frequently used without precision, sometimes giving rise to ambiguity or even mystique. In this perspective paper, we clarify the scientific meaning of emergence as a measurable and physically grounded phenomenon. Through concrete examples, such as temperature, magnetism, and herd immunity in social networks, we review how collective behavior can arise from local interactions that are constrained by global boundaries. By refining the concept of emergence, we gain a clearer and more grounded understanding of complex systems. Our goal is to show that emergence, when properly framed, offers not mysticism but insight.

2025-07-07T12:52:57Z 9 pages, 3 figures, 163 references Abbas K. Rizi 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag010