https://arxiv.org/api/rZJVnYnxCsc+XUQv7zx0GUhctcU 2026-06-13T20:02:48Z 5610 180 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19566v3 2026-01-26T20:50:48Z

The complex relationship between Einstein's second postulate and the Maxwell electromagnetic theory is elucidated. A simple deduction of the main results of the Ignatowski approach to the theory of relativity is given. The peculiar status of the principle of relativity among the Maxwellians is illustrated.

2024-04-30T13:55:26Z Several statements have been corrected, and new sentences have been added to the penultimate paragraph of Section 3 and to the footnote 8, along with a new reference [43] Time and Space 2026, 2(2), 4 D V Redžić 10.3390/timespace2020004 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06058v1 2026-01-25T11:12:03Z

This manuscript presents an historical perspective prepared by Barry Ninham and Colin Pask in 1969 on the connection between quantum electrodynamics theory and nucleon interactions. A new theory of strong interactions based on electromagnetic considerations is proposed. Energy and force range magnitudes are correctly given. A new theory of the pion emerges and the pion mass and lifetime are calculated. No strong interaction coupling constant is required.

2026-01-25T11:12:03Z 7 pages, 1 image Substantia, 2025 Mathias Boström Drew F. Parsons 10.36253/Substantia-3509 http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.01833v12 2026-01-23T14:56:09Z

This paper discusses the historical evidence for the light jets from the central Super Massive Black Hole of Galaxy in the 4th and 14th centuries. We suggest that the apparitions of a "lightening cross" recorded in 312, 351, 1317 and 1377 years were caused by the line of two jets beamed back-to-back from the center of Milky Way (MW), which is crossing the visible projection of the Galaxy disk. All historical accounts give precise time and geographical locations, where from X-crosses was seen: in the vicinity of Rome, in Jerusalem, in Tver' (the vicinity of Moscow) and in night sky over Moscow, respectively). The positions of the Sun (or the Moon) were also mentioned in the Middle Age manuscripts. These positions coincide with the location of the MW center on the sky map in these specific places and dates, as it is shown with the help of Wolfram Astronomy visualization instruments. We suggest that the gap between jet activity events is about thousand years. The X cross in the sky was mentioned by Plato in {\it Timaeus}\cite{plato}, but he cannot be eyewitness and could only take this from the narratives of older ancient sages. The X cross pictures are multiply stamped on Roman coins. It is also important that the 4th and the 14th centuries were times when the climate vent colder. The processes in Galaxy are often periodic because of orbital movements, so we should consider the thousand years periods in the climate changes as well.

2017-11-06T11:10:35Z 8 pages, 7 figures, the presentation at IC-MSQUARE 2025 Olga I. Piskounova Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia Irina V. Tamarkina Wisconsin-Madison Uni., USA Hebrew Uni., Jerusalem, independent researcher http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16678v1 2026-01-23T11:48:17Z

In this HYP2025 talk I pay tribute to Tullio Bressani (1940-2024), Bogdan Povh (1932-2024) and Toshimitsu Yamazaki (1934-2025), all of whom made lasting contributions to shaping up Strangeness Nuclear Physics. Yoshinori Akaishi's (1941-2025) record is also noted.

2026-01-23T11:48:17Z Plenary talk at HYP2025, Tokyo, Sept.-Oct. 2025, to be published in JPS Conf Proc Avraham Gal http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10959v4 2026-01-22T21:31:14Z

Are your perceptions, memories and observational data, a statistical fluctuation out of the thermal equilibrium of the universe, having no correlation with the actual past state of the universe? Arguments are given in the literature for and against this "Boltzmann brain" hypothesis. Complicating these arguments have been the many subtle -- and very often implicit -- joint dependencies among these arguments and others that have been given for the past hypothesis, the second law, and even for Bayesian inference of the reliability of experimental data. These dependencies can easily lead to circular reasoning. To avoid this problem, since all of these arguments involve the stochastic properties of the dynamics of the universe's entropy, we begin by formalizing that dynamics as a time-symmetric, time-translation invariant Markov process, which we call the entropy conjecture. Crucially, like all stochastic processes, the entropy conjecture does not specify any time(s) which it should be conditioned on in order to infer the stochastic dynamics of our universe's entropy. Any such choice of conditioning times and associated entropy values must be introduced as an independent assumption. This observation allows us to disentangle the standard Boltzmann brain hypothesis, its "1000CE" variant, the past hypothesis, the second law, and the reliability of our experimental data, all in a fully formal manner. In particular, we show that these all make an arbitrary assumption that the dynamics of the universe's entropy should be conditioned on a single event at a single moment in time, differing only in the details of their assumptions. In this aspect, the Boltzmann brain hypothesis and the second law are equally legitimate (or not).

2025-07-15T03:42:00Z 17 pages, 1 figure Entropy (2025), 27(12), 1227 David Wolpert Carlo Rovelli Jordan Scharnhorst 10.3390/e27121227 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16246v1 2026-01-22T17:24:40Z

The historical and conceptual foundations of General Relativity are revisited, putting the main focus on the physical meaning of the invariant ds, the Equivalence Principle, and the precise interpretation of spacetime geometry. It is argued that Albert Einstein initially sought a dynamical formulation in which ds encoded the gravitational effects, without invoking curvature as a physical entity. The now more familiar geometrical interpretation (identifying gravitation with spacetime curvature) gradually emerged through his collaboration with Marcel Grossmann and the adoption of the Ricci tensor in 1915. Anyhow, in his 1920 Leiden lecture, Einstein explicitly reinterpreted spacetime geometry as the state of a physical medium (an ether endowed with metrical properties but devoid of mechanical substance) thereby actually rejecting geometry as an independent ontological reality. Building upon this mature view, gravitation is reconstructed from the Weak Equivalence Principle, understood as the exact compensation between inertial and gravitational forces acting on a body under a uniform gravitational field. From this fundamental principle, together with an extension of Fermat Principle to massive objects, the invariant ds is obtained, first in the static case, where the gravitational potential modifies the flow of proper time. Then, by applying the Lorentz transformation to this static invariant, its general form is derived for the case of matter in motion. The resulting invariant reproduces the relativistic form of Newton second law in proper time and coincides with the weak field limit of General Relativity in the harmonic gauge.

2026-01-22T17:24:40Z Version accepted for publication in AppiedMath AppliedMath 2026, 6(1), 18 Jaume de Haro Emilio Elizalde 10.3390/appliedmath6010018 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15837v1 2026-01-22T10:44:13Z

This paper examines how, in the tenth century, medieval Iranian scholars Abu Rayhan al-Biruni and Abu al-Wafa al-Buzjani determined the difference in geographical longitude between the cities of Baghdad and Khwarezm through simultaneous observation of a lunar eclipse. Brief academic biographies of these scholars are presented, with emphasis on their contributions to mathematics and astronomy. The study discusses the importance of determining geographical coordinates - especially longitude - in the science of the 10th-11th centuries, provides an overview of the methods of coordinate determination available at the time, and highlights the problem of synchronizing remote observations prior to the advent of electronic communication. Particular attention is devoted to a detailed analysis of the method based on observing a lunar eclipse to simultaneously measure longitude differences: the necessary conditions and organization of the experiment, the instruments employed, the mathematical calculations, and error estimates are described. The longitude difference obtained by al-Biruni and al-Buzjani is compared with modern values. The conclusion discusses the scientific significance of this method for the history of science and astronomy.

2026-01-22T10:44:13Z 13 pages, 1 figures Rizoi Bakhromzod http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12926v2 2026-01-21T16:07:14Z

The 1974 papers by Ostriker et al. [1974] and Einasto et al. [1974] are considered by many to be pivotal in establishing the epistemic foundations for the dark matter hypothesis. From a theory confirmation point of view, the circumstances surrounding this pivot are difficult to reconcile with common approaches to epistemic support. First, the papers did not introduce any new observations. Second, they synthesized existing data from two separate contexts to construct a hypothesis under which the joint data became evidentially relevant. Third, this synthesis was motivated in part by non-empirical reasons. The situation excludes both temporal novelty and use novelty because already known data was used in the construction of the hypothesis. Yet, the papers are widely regarded as epistemically transformative. I argue that a Bayesian can model the epistemic significance of the 1974 papers without concession. By recognizing how the papers reconfigured the existing data to bear on a missing mass hypothesis, a novel epistemic aspect emerges. By introducing a shared halo parameterization, they made the previously disjoint data mutually constrained, thereby changing their evidential role. I develop this idea through two concepts - evidential reconfiguration and structural novelty - leveraged through Myrvold's Bayesian account of unification. The result makes Bayesianism faithful to the inferential practices in this significant part of scientific history, explains how the 1974 papers strengthened the evidential case for dark matter, and expands the Bayesian toolbox with a way to treat novel structure as epistemologically salient.

2025-12-15T02:24:10Z Simon Allzén http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18810v1 2026-01-20T01:22:22Z

This paper argues that several canonical puzzles in quantum mechanics, including spin measurement, the double slit, entanglement correlations, and Wigner's friend, share a common origin in a semantic error and the illicit promotion of interaction conditional outcomes to intrinsic properties. I introduce four principles that license only configuration relative predication, grounding outcomes in physical measurement geometry while preserving objectivity. Applying these principles uniformly dissolves each puzzle without new physics or ad hoc interpretive machinery. Bell's theorem and the Kochen-Specker theorem are reframed not as dynamical mysteries but as constraints on permissible explanatory structure, evidence that intrinsic-outcome semantics is incompatible with empirical reality. The result is a relational objectivity that avoids both naive property realism and observer subjectivism.

2026-01-20T01:22:22Z Jonathon Sendall http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14322v1 2026-01-19T23:43:06Z

In a brief reflection on the principles of human society, P. A. M. Dirac articulated a structural tension between two widely affirmed norms: that it is good and natural for parents to improve the prospects of their own children, and that justice requires that all children have equal opportunities in life. These principles, each compelling on its own, cannot be fully realized together. This paper reconstructs Dirac's dilemma, connects it to the dynamics of compounding advantage and inheritance, and situates it within the broader history of political philosophy, including the work of Rawls, Dworkin, Cohen, Brighouse and Swift, Nozick, Murphy and Nagel, and others. The paper argues that attempts to eliminate the resulting injustices entirely risk damaging the non--zero--sum structures that generate general prosperity, and defends a position of "managed inequality": a robust social floor and real mobility, combined with limits on extreme dynastic accumulation and an explicit acceptance of some residual, but constrained, inherited advantage.

2026-01-19T23:43:06Z 7 pages Karl Svozil http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13109v1 2026-01-19T14:49:50Z

Feynman famously said that single-particle interference is ``a phenomenon which is impossible to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics.'' In this paper we show that some of the phenomenology of interference can be reproduced in a ``classical'' way, by reproducing the Elitzur-Vaidman Bomb Tester (including their improved version) using an extension of the quantum simulation logic (QSL) formalism. Our result improves and simplifies a previous result by Catani \emph{et al}, which relies on a much more complicated extension involving a ``toy field theory.'' We also show that not all single-particle interference can be explained by such a simple extension (including that of Catani et al), by showing that Hofmann's three-path interferometer is ``nonclassical'' in a very specific sense: it violates a Kochen-Specker-noncontextual inequality. Given that both our extension of QSL and Catani et al's extension are \emph{noncontextual} -- so do not reproduce the contextual behaviour of Hofmann's three-path interferometer -- the behaviour of that interferometer is a proper example of a phenomenon that has in it the heart of quantum mechanics, according to Feynman.

2026-01-19T14:49:50Z 8 pages, 6 figures Jonte R. Hance Jakov Krnic Jan-Åke Larsson http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14316v1 2026-01-19T12:38:54Z

In this paper we approach the problem of superdeterminism from a novel point of view, highlighting its character as a more metaphysical than scientific proposition. First, we introduce a distinction between two types of superdeterministic theories, naïve (NSD) and metaphysical (MSD), and argue how NSD presents significant epistemic flaws. We show how NSD justifies itself through claims to fundamentality, thus connoting itself as a metaphysical theory rather than a scientific one. We finally illustrate that the most developed MSD model so far, Invariant Set Theory, implicitly proposes a confused form of priority monism. Our paper thus reinforces the thesis that theories should demonstrate rather than assume fundamentality and that it is methodologically flawed for a theory to assume its own fundamentality for the sole purpose of defending against criticisms.

2026-01-19T12:38:54Z 15 pages, 2 figures Gabriele Cafiero Luca Molinari Jonte R. Hance http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.2266v3 2026-01-19T01:00:01Z

Natural philosophy integrates scientific observation with abstract frameworks, often using a mathematical Ansatz to hypothesise about physical phenomena. Exploring the possibility of other universes, however, challenges assumptions that physical laws, like spacetime geometry, extend beyond our reality. This paper argues that mathematical abstractions, serving as a telescope beyond physical constraints, enable such reasoning. Through a projective algebra formalism (Section 4), we model the mechanism of Ansatz, abstractly describing physical objects. This yields a resolution to Wigner's unreasonable effectiveness via cardinality equivalence (Section 5) and clarifies terms like 'evidence' and 'existence' (Section 6) to align with the conventions used in physics. A Cantor-inspired paradox shows no universe can contain all mathematical abstractions (e.g., sets, numbers), as its power set exceeds it, necessitating an external abstract realm (Section 6.4). This logical necessity, which holds even in the context of alternative set theories like New Foundations, provides evidence for a minimal external universe as an abstract realm, supporting Mathematical Realism. This result is not specific to the formalism, as long as we accept that the principles of set theory are mathematically valid. As abstract entities elude empirical detection, logical evidence is apt, guiding future science and philosophy research and fostering interdisciplinary inquiry.

2013-06-07T01:26:39Z This new 2025-2026 update further generalises the Projective Algebra method developed herein beyond ZFC set theory, extending to New Foundations and other set theoretic systems Jonathan M. M. Hall http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16860v3 2026-01-19T00:31:50Z

We establish three impossibility results regarding our knowledge of the quantum state of the universe. Suppose the universal quantum state is a typical unit vector in a high-dimensional subspace $\mathscr{H}_0$ of Hilbert space $\mathscr{H}$, such as the low-entropy subspace defined by the Past Hypothesis. We show that: (1) Any particular observation is incapable of identifying the universal state vector in $\mathscr{H}_0$ or substantially reducing the set of possibilities. In other words, the overwhelming majority of possible state vectors are observationally indistinguishable from each other. (2) For any reasonably probable measurement outcome and for most pairs of vectors in $\mathscr{H}_0$, that outcome will not appreciably favor one vector over the other. (3) Bayesian updating on any measurement result, unless it is extraordinarily improbable, has a negligible effect on the initial uniform probability distribution over the states in $\mathscr{H}_0$. These findings represent the most stringent epistemic constraints known for a quantum universe and are derived from a typicality theorem in quantum statistical mechanics. We close by considering how theoretical considerations beyond empirical evidence might inform our understanding of this fact and our knowledge of the universal quantum state.

2024-10-22T09:59:57Z Accepted version in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 23 pages LaTeX, no figures; v3 minor revision Eddy Keming Chen Roderich Tumulka 10.1086/740609 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12159v1 2026-01-17T20:11:50Z

I define a notion of locality LOC, closely modelled on the Bell principle of Local Causality, construed as the condition that single case probabilities cannot be modified by actions at spacelike separation. The new principle, like that of Bell, forces Bell inequalities, but with two loopholes: one is violation of measurement independence, known to Bell, but the other is non-uniqueness of remote outcomes, a loophole only for LOC, not for Local Causality. I also set out a theory of physical probability, applicable to the Everett interpretation, in which the Born rule is derived, and which therefore violates Bell inequalities. I show it is consistent with LOC. Surprisingly, both loopholes are exploited. I conclude not only that physical probability in the Everett interpretation involves no action at a distance, but that the observed violation of Bell inequalities is powerful evidence for many worlds.

2026-01-17T20:11:50Z To appear in Local Quantum Mechanics: Everett, many worlds, and reality, A. Ney (ed.), Oxford University Press. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2512.00575 Simon Saunders