https://arxiv.org/api/WkjzcG3QroXClNNCjsoaZr2lmeU2026-06-13T18:55:58Z561016515http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23923v2Geometric View of One-Dimensional Quantum Mechanics2026-02-05T19:59:44ZWe apply De Haro's Geometric View of Theories to one of the simplest quantum systems: a spinless particle on a line and on a circle. The classical phase space M = T*Q is taken as the base of a trivial Hilbert bundle E ~ M x H, and the familiar position and momentum representations are realised as different global trivialisations of this bundle. The Fourier transform appears as a fibrewise unitary transition function, so that the standard position-momentum duality is made precise as a change of coordinates on a single geometric object. For the circle, we also discuss twisted boundary conditions and show how a twist parameter can be incorporated either as a fixed boundary condition or as a base coordinate, in which case it gives rise to a flat U(H)-connection with nontrivial holonomy. These examples provide a concrete illustration of how the Geometric View organises quantum-mechanical representations and dualities in geometric terms.2025-12-30T00:48:29ZEren Volkan Küçükhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03085v2The Stochastic-Quantum Theorem2026-02-05T06:39:59ZThis paper introduces several new classes of mathematical structures that have close connections with physics and with the theory of dynamical systems. The most general of these structures, called indivisible stochastic processes, collectively encompass many important kinds of stochastic processes, including Markov chains and random dynamical systems. This paper then states and proves a new theorem that establishes a precise correspondence between any indivisible stochastic process and a unitarily evolving quantum system. This theorem therefore leads to a new formulation of quantum theory, alongside the Hilbert-space, path-integral, and quasi-probability formulations. The theorem also provides a first-principles explanation for why quantum systems are based on the complex numbers, Hilbert spaces, linear-unitary time evolution, and the Born rule. In addition, the theorem suggests that by selecting a suitable Hilbert space, together with an appropriate choice of unitary evolution, one can simulate any indivisible stochastic process on a quantum computer, thereby potentially opening up an extensive set of novel applications for quantum computing.2023-09-03T15:28:07Z32 pages, no figuresJacob A. Barandeshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05063v1Intereses convergentes: los años previos a la visita de Einstein a la Argentina en 19252026-02-04T21:29:12ZWe analyze in some detail the years leading up to Albert Einstein's visit to Argentina, from the moment he rose to fame after the publication of the results of the 1919 solar eclipse, until his arrival at the port of Buenos Aires in March 1925. We will see that this major event in the country's cultural life did not arise from a vacuum but was the product of diverse interests and unique international and local circumstances. The social and political situation surrounding the eminent scientist and the impetus provided by individuals and institutions in Buenos Aires played a decisive role, ultimately converging in the "successful" reception of this extraordinary figure in a country on the scientific periphery of the first quarter of the 20th century. We also review the written references and knowledge circulating in the local milieu on topics related to the theory of relativity in the years prior to his arrival in the country.2026-02-04T21:29:12ZArticle in Spanish, PDF document including 6 figures. Paper presented at The III JEHA - Jornadas de Epistemologia e Historia de la Astronomia, held in the Astronomical Observatory of Cordoba, Argentina, 3-5 november 2025Alejandro Ganguihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07053v1Infinite multiverses and where to find them?2026-02-04T16:08:03ZHave you ever watched superhero movies like Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse? Or played games where your choices create different outcomes? What if we told you that in the real world, something even crazier might be happening all the time, right under our noses? Imagine shrinking down to the size of an atom. What you'd see wouldn't be like our everyday world at all! This is the realm of quantum physics, where the rules we know do not apply, where things exist everywhere and nowhere at once. The moment you observe something, it starts behaving differently. In this article, we will explore two of the many possible explanations for such phenomena, namely the Copenhagen interpretation and the many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics. We will also try to answer the question of whether there are many copies of you roaming around in different universes, and why you haven't met one.2026-02-04T16:08:03ZThis article is part of a special MSCA edition of Frontiers for Young Minds, a science journal designed especially for children and edited by kids aged 8-15. The goal of the article is to explain challenging quantum ideas in a fun, engaging, and easy-to-understand way for a young audienceAnubhav Kumar SrivastavaPavel P. PopovGuillem Müller-RigatMaciej Lewensteinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04484v1From Florence to Fermions: a historical reconstruction of the origins of Fermi's statistics one hundred years later2026-02-04T12:10:23ZAim of this paper is to retrace the path that led the young Enrico Fermi to write his paper on the statistics of an ideal monatomic gas. This discovery originated in his interest, which he had shown since his formative years, in the absolute entropy constant and in the problems he highlighted in Sommerfeld's quantization in the case of identical particle systems. The fundamental step taken by Fermi in writing his work on statistics was to apply the Exclusion Principle, formulated for electrons in an atom and which could therefore have been a pure effect due to dynamics, to a system of non-interacting particles.2026-02-04T12:10:23Z19 pages, 8 figuresRoberto CasalbuoniDaniele Dominicihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.25057v2The Logical Structure of Physical Laws: A Fixed Point Reconstruction2026-02-03T17:38:46ZWe formalise the self-referential definition of physical laws using monotone operators on a lattice of theories, resolving the pathologies of naive set-theoretic formulations. By invoking Tarski fixed point theorem, we identify physical theories as the least fixed points of admissibility constraints derived from Galois connections. We demonstrate that QED and GR can be represented in such a logical structure with respect to their symmetry and locality principles.2025-12-31T18:52:49ZEren Volkan Küçükhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02667v1Probabilistic inference in very large universes2026-02-02T19:00:05Z[Abridged] Some cosmological theories propose that the observable universe is a small part of a much larger universe in which parameters describing the low-energy laws of physics vary from region to region. How can we reasonably assess a theory that describes such a mostly unobservable universe? We propose a Bayesian method based on theory-generated probability distributions for our observations. We focus on basic principles, leaving aside concerns about practicality. (We also leave aside the measure problem, to discuss other issues.) We argue that cosmological theories can be tested by standard Bayesian updating, but we need to use theoretical predictions for "first-person" probabilities -- i.e., probabilities for our observations, accounting for all relevant selection effects. These selection effects can depend on the observer, and on time, so in principle first-person probabilities are defined for each observer-instant -- an observer at an instant of time. First-person probabilities should take into account everything the observer believes about herself and her surroundings -- i.e., her "subjective state". We advocate a "Principle of Self-Locating Indifference" (PSLI), asserting that any real observer should make predictions as if she were chosen randomly from the theoretically predicted observer-instants that share her subjective state. We believe the PSLI is intuitively very reasonable, but also argue that it maximizes the expected fraction of observers who will make correct predictions. Cosmological theories will in general predict a set of possible universes, each with a probability. To calculate first-person probabilities, we argue that each possible universe should be weighted by the number of observer-instants in the specified subjective state that it contains. We also discuss Boltzmann brains, the humans/Jovians parable of Hartle and Srednicki, and the use of "old evidence".2026-02-02T19:00:05Z28 pages, 1 figureFeraz AzharAlan H. GuthMohammad Hossein Namjoohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09650v4Beyond Point Particles -- Extended Structural Dynamics and the H Theorem2026-02-02T17:07:58ZWe propose an extended structural dynamics framework that enriches classical mechanics by treating particle orientation and internal structure as fundamental phase-space coordinates. This extension preserves Hamiltonian structure and Liouville invariance while revealing two distinct mechanisms for entropy production: (i) collisional randomization through orientation-dependent scattering (generalizing Boltzmann), and (ii) continuous geometric instability arising from rotational-deformational coupling. We argue this dual-mechanism structure provides a dynamical justification for the molecular chaos assumption central to Boltzmann-Lanford derivations, particularly in regimes (dense systems, few bodies, structured particles) where classical point-particle theory fails. Recent mathematical advances (Deng, Hani & Ma 2024) extend Lanford's theorem to arbitrary times but still require molecular chaos as input and apply only to dilute gases. This extended structural framework addresses the complementary philosophical question: how can molecular chaos itself emerge from deterministic dynamics? We show that geometric instability in extended phase space makes entropy-decreasing trajectories dynamically unstable, offering a structural explanation for the Second Law. This reframes thermodynamic irreversibility as a geometric property of structured motion rather than a purely statistical postulate.2025-05-13T10:48:06ZTitle and abstract updatedPatrick BarAvihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01302v1Todos estos edificios se hacen de diverso modo que en Europa: Estudio arqueoastronómico de las iglesias jesuíticas de Chiquitos2026-02-01T16:04:07ZThe study of the spatial layout of Christian churches has been of great interest since late Antiquity and the beginning of the Early Middle Ages, and has received a new impetus in recent literature when it was recognized that the orientation of their main axes represents a key feature of their architecture. From the earliest Christian communities, the orientation of the church allowed the faithful to pray facing the east, towards the rising Sun. Several authors were careful to point this out in their writings; in particular, prior to the Council of Nicaea (325 AD), the Apostolic Constitutions indicated: "And let it be, first, the elongated building, with its head facing east". We present a detailed analysis of the spatial orientation of the historic churches located in the Jesuit towns of Chiquitania (Bolivia). We have measured in situ the main characteristics of eight churches currently standing and the ruins of a ninth construction. In all cases, we carry out a thorough survey of the landscape surrounding each church, trying to find some common pattern, possibly astronomical, that explains its orientations. To our list we also add the orientation measures of a tenth church based on work with plans and satellite maps. We complement our data with a detailed cultural and historical study of the characteristics of missionary towns. Unlike the churches of the Guarani towns of the historic province of Paraquaria where the meridian orientations stand out, in the case of the Jesuit churches of Chiquitos, half of the measured constructions show orientations that fall within the solar range, with three churches oriented equinoctially with high precision. We analyze the reasons for these orientations and delve further on the possible relevance that lighting effects could have had for the architects of these churches, which represent true hidden cathedrals in the virgin tropical forest.2026-02-01T16:04:07ZArticle in Spanish, PDF document. Published in Barroco. Enigmas y misterios, edited by N.Campos, La Paz: Vision Cultural, pp. 99-109, 2024Alejandro Ganguihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01043v1A Deflationary Account of Quantum Theory and its Implications for the Complex Numbers2026-02-01T06:04:07ZWhy does quantum theory need the complex numbers? With a view toward answering this question, this paper argues that the usual Hilbert-space formalism is a special case of the general method of Markovian embeddings. This paper then describes the indivisible interpretation of quantum theory, according to which a quantum system can be regarded as an indivisible stochastic process unfolding in an old-fashioned configuration space, with wave functions and other exotic Hilbert-space ingredients demoted from having an ontological status. The complex numbers end up being necessary to ensure that the Hilbert-space formalism is indeed a Markovian embedding.2026-02-01T06:04:07Z15 pages, no figuresJacob A. Barandeshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2501.13521v2Navigating permanent underdetermination in dark energy and inflationary cosmology2026-01-30T13:28:31ZWe identify troubling cases of so-called `permanent underdetermination' in both dark energy and inflationary cosmology. We bring to bear (a) a taxonomy of possible responses to underdetermination, and (b) an understanding of both dark energy and inflationary cosmology from an effective field theory point of view. We argue that, under certain conditions, there are viable responses which can arguably alleviate at least some of the concerns about underdetermination in the dark energy and inflationary sectors. However, the epistemic threat of permanent underdetermination remains a significant challenge.2025-01-23T10:15:24ZUpdated version. Accepted in Philosophy of PhysicsPhilosophy of Physics 4 (2026) 1William J. WolfJames Read10.31389/pop.269http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09033v1Schrodinger Was Right!2026-01-29T23:08:14ZNow that we have reached the centennial of Erwin Schrodinger's seminal paper introducing the wavefunction theory of matter, it is right and proper to inquire as to its legacy. It is undeniable that today every paper in atomic physics cites his 1926 equation in the first paragraph. But the philosophy undergirding the wavefunction seems to have fallen into the shadows. And Schrodinger left his program incomplete. I will argue here that recent developments in nonlinear mathematics, including so-called "chaos theory", permit finishing the task. It turns out that one nonlinear addition to his equation from 1926 can resolve both the Measurement Problem and the Randomness Problem. With this emendation, the wavefunction alone suffices to explain the outcomes of many experiments (and it is particles that can be relegated to the shadows).2026-01-29T23:08:14ZW. David Wickhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22133v1Putting Pressure Under Pressure: On the Status of Classical Pressure in Special Relativity2026-01-29T18:53:47ZMuch of the century-old debate surrounding the status of thermodynamics in relativity has centered on the search for a suitably relativistic temperature; recent works by Chua (2023) and Chua and Callender (forthcoming) have suggested that the classical temperature concept -- consilient as it is in classical settings -- 'falls apart' in relativity. However, these discussions typically assume an unproblematic Lorentz transformation for -- specifically, the Lorentz invariance of -- the pressure concept. Here I argue that, just like the classical temperature, the classical concept of pressure breaks down in relativistic settings. I discuss how this might suggest a new thermodynamic limit -- a u --> 0 limit -- without which an unambiguous thermodynamic description of systems doesn't emerge.2026-01-29T18:53:47ZAccepted at Synthese. Preprint of 30 Jan 2026. Please cite published version when availableEugene Y. S. Chuahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22188v1The Beta-Bound: Drift constraints for Gated Quantum Probabilities2026-01-29T01:36:31ZQuantum mechanics provides extraordinarily accurate probabilistic predictions, yet the framework remains silent on what distinguishes quantum systems from definite measurement outcomes. This paper develops a measurement-theoretic framework for projective gating. The central object is the $β$-bound, an inequality that controls how much probability assignments can drift when gating and measurement fail to commute. For a density operator $ρ$, projector $F$, and effect $E$, with gate-passage probability $s = {\rm Tr}(ρF)$ and commutator norm $\varepsilon = \|[F, E]\|$, the symmetric partial-gating drift satisfies $|Δp_F(E)| \leq 2 \sqrt{(1 - s)/s} \cdot \varepsilon$. The constant 2 is sharp. We introduce two diagnostic quantities: the coherence witness $W(ρ, F) = \|F ρ(I - F)\|_1$, measuring cross-boundary coherence, and the record fidelity gap $Δ_T(ρ_F, R)$, measuring expectation-value change under symmetrisation. Three experimental vignettes demonstrate falsifiability: Hong--Ou--Mandel interferometry, atomic energy-basis dephasing, and decoherence-induced classicality. The framework is operational and interpretation-neutral, compatible with Everettian, Bohmian, QBist, and collapse approaches. It provides quantitative structure that any interpretation must accommodate, along with a template for experimental tests.2026-01-29T01:36:31Z18 pagesJonathon Sendallhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20488v1Revisiting the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: From FAPP Solutions to Contextual Ontologies2026-01-28T11:05:16ZThis note presents a concise and non-polemical comparison of several major interpretations of quantum mechanics, with a particular emphasis on the distinction between FAPP-solutions ("For All Practical Purposes'') versus ontological solutions to the measurement problem. Building on this distinction, we argue that the Contexts-Systems-Modalities (CSM) framework, supplemented by the operator-algebraic description of macroscopic contexts, provides a conceptually complete, non-FAPP ontology that naturally incorporates irreversibility and the physical structure of measurement devices. This approach differs significantly from other ontological interpretations such as Bohmian mechanics, spontaneous collapse, or many-worlds, and highlights the major role of contextual quantization in shaping quantum theory.2026-01-28T11:05:16Z5 pages, one tablePhilippe Grangier