https://arxiv.org/api/T2NHmvp0+7Lv6E5b8SuOsqXa5ZA2026-03-23T00:24:58Z553715015http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14122v1QBism, Polishing Some Points2025-12-16T06:08:27ZQBism pursues the real by first eliminating the elements of quantum theory too fragile to be ontologies on their own. Thereafter, it seeks an "ontological lesson" from whatever remains. Here, we explore this program by highlighting three tenets of QBism. First, the Born Rule is a normative statement. It is about the decision-making behavior any individual agent should strive for, not a descriptive "law of nature." Second, all probabilities, including all quantum probabilities, are so subjective they never tell nature what to do. This includes probability-1 assignments. Quantum states thus have no "ontic hold" on the world, which implies a more radical kind of indeterminism in quantum theory than other interpretations understand. Third, quantum measurement outcomes just are personal experiences for the agent gambling upon them. Thus all quantum measurement outcomes are local in the sense of the agent enacting them. Through these tenets, we explain four points better than previously: 1) how QBism contrasts with Bohr's concern over unambiguous language, 2) how QBism contrasts with the Everett interpretation, 3) how QBism understands the meaning of Bell inequality violations, and 4) how QBism responds to Wigner's "suspended animation" argument. Finally, we consider the ontological lesson of the tenets and ask what it might mean for the next one hundred years of quantum theory and humankind more generally.2025-12-16T06:08:27Z22 pages, 2 figures; chapter accepted for forthcoming quantum-centennial book; contains passages condensed from arXiv:1705.03483 and arXiv:2303.01446 for a less overspecialized audience, with a healthy proportion of new materialChristopher A. FuchsBlake C. Staceyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13463v1Einstein Was Not a Flat Physicalist: Principle Theories, Constructive Theories, and the Direction of Constraint2025-12-15T16:02:56ZEinstein's distinction between principle theories and constructive theories is methodological rather than metaphysical. Principle theories such as thermodynamics and relativity articulate empirically distilled constraints that delimit admissible microphysical models, while constructive theories remain provisional and revisable. This paper reconstructs Einstein's framework from primary sources and argues that recent appeals to it by Meir Hemmo and Orly Shenker (under the banner of "Flat Physicalism") invert its functional hierarchy. What is presented as an Einsteinian template instead supports a reductionist metaphysics foreign to Einstein's methodology and increasingly misaligned with the structural commitments of contemporary physics.2025-12-15T16:02:56ZGalina Weinsteinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13277v1Challenging historical novae: AT Cnc (1645), Te-11 (483), and M22 (BC 48) revisited2025-12-15T12:37:55ZConnections between novae with shells and historical observations are crucial for astrophysical understanding of long-term evolution of shells and cataclysmic variables. Three of five previously considered links are revisited here: extended features in M22 in BC48, Te-11 in 483, and AT Cnc in 1645. We aim to develop a procedure to check whether these links are credible. Literal translations of the Chinese texts, historically based arguments, and close readings are combined with astrophysics, (peak brightness, decay time estimate, shell age expansion model calculation, etc.). (a) Nandou's second star, near which the BC48 `guest star' was reported, is identified as tau Sgr, not lambda Sgr, far from the M22 location. A nova in M22 would peak at only m=6.4 \pm 1.4 mag, and thus a description as a `blue-white' `melon' does not fit; it was likely a comet. (b) The imprecise position (`Shen['s] east') of the `guest star' in 483, its extended (dipper-like) radiance, and the context speak for a bolide. Considering the new (larger) Gaia distance and small extinction towards Te-11 (outside a cloud), its bi-polar morphology and current expansion velocity point to a planetary nebula; as a nova, the shell expansion age is 1100-2000 yr from detailed supersonic expansion calculations. (c) Most certainly, Mars was meant when the source for 1645 reported `a large star entered Yugui'; the verb implies motion. AT Cnc lies neither in Yugui's asterism box nor in the eponymous lunar mansion range. The fluid drag expansion age of AT Cancri's ejecta is 128-631 yr. All three exact ages are unsubstantiated. True novae or nova shells can be connected to historical records only if the position and object type are plausible. Duration, brightness (light curve), and color (evolution) should fit and could provide more astrophysical insight ...2025-12-15T12:37:55Z13 pages with 2 tables and 7 figures (appeared in A&A)A&A 704, A251 (2025)D. L. NeuhäuserU JenaR. NeuhäuserU JenaV. HambaryanU JenaJ. ChapmanSociety for the Study of Early ChinaM. Della ValleINAF Napoli10.1051/0004-6361/202554643http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11019v1Ugo Amaldi, the DELPHI Collaboration and The Physics Legacy of LEP2025-12-11T18:42:24ZThis article offers a portrait of the DELPHI experiment at CERN's Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP) through the scientific life and leadership of Ugo Amaldi. It traces how DELPHI contributed to LEP's physics program, from precision studies at the Z pole to higher-energy running with W-pair production and increasingly ambitious Higgs searches. Along the way, it highlights Ugo Amaldi's technical and organizational innovations, especially his insistence on bold detector choices and his sustained support for young physicists and collaborative leadership. The article also recalls Ugo's influential work on the unification of forces and shows how DELPHI's technologies, software, governance structures, and data-sharing practices anticipated many features of later collider experiments and of contemporary science policy. In this sense, DELPHI's legacy is not only foundational for today's particle physics, but also a lasting and formative element of modern scientific culture.2025-12-11T18:42:24ZContribution to Symposium to celebrate Ugo Amaldi's 90th birthday, CERN, April 2025. To be published in Atti dell'Accademia del XLAlessandro De Angelishttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10775v1Deflating the Spacetime-Matter Dichotomy2025-12-11T16:11:47ZIn this paper we analyse scalar-tensor theories-specific instances of which include mainstream inflation and dark energy models-in light of the spacetime-matter dichotomy. We argue that it is difficult to categorise the scalar fields as either a pure aspect of the spacetime structure or a pure form of matter, by focusing on the Jordan vs Einstein frames of these theories. We present and evaluate various interpretational options available, concluding that the spacetime-matter dichotomy becomes untenable in this context. At the same time, the ontological and conceptual category of spacetime can be decoupled from that of gravity, with the latter remaining viable in the context of scalar-tensor theories.2025-12-11T16:11:47ZAntonio FerreiroAlex FleurenNiels C. M. Martenshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04128v2Questions related to the Deflection of Light by Gravity determined by Soldner, Einstein and Schwarzschild2025-12-11T08:16:53ZBefore we discuss the deflection of light in a gravitational field, we give a brief overview of some basic physical formulas on photon properties, generation and propagation. The much debated problems of the redshift and the photon propagation in a gravitational field is then considered and applied to the calculation of the speed of light. Many citations are given in direct quotations to avoid any misunderstandings. If the quotations are in German, an English translation is provided. Based on this speed, calculated and measured results are recalled on the deflection of light, with emphasis on the deflection near the Sun. We conclude that the speed of light and the deflection angle can be determined by energy and momentum conservation principles.2025-12-03T03:33:55Z20 pages; Version 2Klaus WilhelmBhola N. DwivediKarsten Mullerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01803v3Time as a Cosmological Phenomenon2025-12-10T12:15:01ZWe show that the arrow of time is intimately related to the geometry and topology of the whole universe, and is therefore best understood as a cosmological phenomenon.2025-08-03T15:39:04ZSeveral clarifications. Included a brief discussion on singularity theorems in the Lambda>0 caseAndrea Palessandrohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05129v2Thermal stability originates the vanishing of the specific heats at the absolute zero2025-12-08T06:36:55ZThe relationship between the vanishing of the heat capacities as $T\to0^+$ and the thermal stability is examined. The heat capacities vanish as fast as or faster than $T$ as $T\to0^+$ for states at the phase space boundary ($T=0$) to sustain the standard thermal stability criterion $U_{ss}>0$. Conversely, weakly vanishing heat capacities, which signify a loss of curvature in $U(S)$ at $T=0$, are the signature of a critical condition precisely at $T=0$, as exemplified in marginal Fermi liquids. Therefore, the vanishing of the specific heat should be viewed not as a new law but as a confirmatory result of the existing framework of thermodynamics.2025-11-24T08:39:51Z4pages, 1figure, 1500 words in text, version in Spanish available elsewherePhysica Scripta 2025 100 125206 Martín-OlallaJosé María10.1088/1402-4896/ae22a5http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07101v1Wigner's Frame2025-12-08T02:31:57ZThis article suggests that thinking about the role of reference frames can provide new insight into Extended Wigner's Friend scenarios. This involves appealing to symmetries to make a principled distinction between properties of a system which are meaningful only relative to an external reference system and properties which are meaningful without further relativization. Thus we may propose that there are always well-defined facts about what observers have observed, but there are not necessarily well-defined facts about the relations between their reference frames, so there will not always exist a joint distribution over their outcomes which can meaningfully be compared to the predictions of quantum mechanics. In addition, this approach also offers a general argument against the idea that there should be a regress of relativization.2025-12-08T02:31:57ZEmily Adlamhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07027v1The Fine-Structure Constant as a Scaled Quantity2025-12-07T22:41:47ZThe fine-structure constant alpha approximately 1/137 is traditionally regarded as a fundamental dimensionless parameter. I argue instead that alpha is a scaled quantity that arises only where the structural scales contributed by classical electromagnetism (e), quantum mechanics (h-bar), and special relativity (c) intersect. None of these theories, taken individually, supplies the independent scales required to define alpha. The constant first appears when relativistic corrections are added to the Schrodinger-Bohr description of hydrogen (Sommerfeld), and it becomes the structural coupling in quantum electrodynamics, where quantum and relativistic effects modify the classical electromagnetic interaction. Expressing the governing laws in canonical form reveals this dependence and eliminates representational artifacts that make alpha appear fundamental. The running of alpha in QED further demonstrates its status as a scale-dependent coupling rather than a universal constant. I conclude that alpha is a domain-specific structural ratio reflecting contingent relationships among independent physical scales.2025-12-07T22:41:47ZHarry Stickerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06543v1A result from the thesis of the french astronomer Alexandre Véronnet: critical latitudes2025-12-06T19:30:26ZWe are interested in a result found in the thesis of the astronomer Alexandre Véronnet (1876-1951) : "Precession of a fluid ring rotating along a parallel axis. Zone of maximum crustal compression at 35$^\circ$. A cause of earthquakes". In 1912, Alexandre Véronnet hypothesizes that the Earth's rotation influences the occurrence of earthquakes in the 35th parallel zone. Has this hypothesis been taken up by other authors, geophysicists, seismologists, etc.? Has it been confirmed or refuted? What is the literature on this subject? Our aim is not to draw a conclusion on this hypothesis but to examine the dissemination of a scientific result.2025-12-06T19:30:26Zworking document, version 1Hervé Le Ferrandhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15730v1A catalog of old globes in Spanish public collections2025-12-05T17:38:57ZThis paper presents the first catalog of celestial and terrestrial globes, as well as armillary spheres and orreries, produced before 1900 and preserved in Spanish public institutions. Most globes have an English or French origin, predominantly from the late 18th or 19th centuries. We highlight a few outstanding examples, including an early metallic terrestrial globe, a mysterious blue celestial manuscript globe, the oldest preserved Spanish printed globe, and some interesting clockwork pieces. While Spain has not been a major producer of globes, it does preserve around two hundred historical globes in public collections, including several remarkable pieces.2025-12-05T17:38:57Z41 pages, 11 figures, 2 tables, accepted for publication in the Journal for the History of AstronomyMiguel Querejetahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05164v1From Kinematics to Interference: Operational Requirements for the Quantum Principle of Relativity2025-12-04T12:22:39ZThe quantum principle of relativity (QPR) puts forward an ambitious idea: extend special relativity with a formally superluminal branch of Lorentz-type maps, and treat the resulting consistency constraints as hints about why quantum theory has the structure it does [1]. The discussion that followed has emphasized a basic point: writing down coordinate maps is not the same thing as providing a physical theory. In particular, quantum superposition is not operationally defined by drawing multiple paths on paper: it is defined by what happens when alternatives recombine in an interference loop [2, 3]. In parallel, careful 1+1 analyses have clarified how sign conventions and time-orientation choices enter the superluminal formulas [4]. Finally, tachyonic QFT proposals suggest a possible mathematical bridge via an enlarged (twin) Hilbert space [5], although this proposal remains contested (e.g., on commutator covariance and microcausality grounds) [6]. The aim of this short note is organizational. We keep three layers separate: (K) kinematics (which maps exist and what they preserve), (O) operational content (what an experiment must actually reproduce, especially closed-loop interference), and (D/B) dynamics and bridges (how amplitudes and probabilities are generated, and how subluminal and superluminal sectors might be linked). The goal is not relativity derives quantum theory, but a clear checklist of what must be added for that ambition to become a well-posed programme.2025-12-04T12:22:39Z6 pages, 8 references, This manuscript is closely related to earlier arXiv preprints by other authorsMikołaj SienickiKrzysztof Sienickihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03843v2The Geometric Origin of Time's Arrow: Loschmidt Resolved2025-12-03T19:51:03ZWe resolve Loschmidt's paradox-the 150-year-old contradiction between time-reversible microscopic dynamics and irreversible macroscopic evolution. The resolution requires both quantum mechanics and classical chaos; neither alone suffices. Quantum uncertainty without chaos produces slow, polynomial spreading-not fundamentally irreversible. Classical chaos without quantum uncertainty produces computational intractability-trajectories diverge exponentially, yet the system remains on one trajectory, reversible in principle with sufficient precision. Only together do they produce geometric impossibility: chaos exponentially amplifies irreducible $\hbar$-scale uncertainty until stable manifolds contract below quantum resolution, rendering time-reversed trajectories physically inaccessible despite being mathematically valid and equiprobable. Information is never destroyed-it becomes geometrically inaccessible. The Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy rate is identical in both time directions, preserving microscopic symmetry while explaining macroscopic irreversibility. Three decades of Loschmidt echo experiments confirm perturbation-independent decay consistent with geometric inaccessibility. The framework unifies thermodynamic, quantum, and information-theoretic arrows of time.2025-11-05T20:23:58Z11 pages, 3 figures. SI- 12 pages, 1 figureIra Wolfsonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04052v1Post-Cold War Diaspora of Russian Particle Physicists2025-12-03T18:35:21ZWhile the migration of scientists from the Soviet Union to the West occurred at a modest pace during the 1970s and 1980s, the dissolution of the USSR in 1991 and the ensuing economic and social hardships precipitated a massive exodus that amounted to a true brain drain. The international physics community, particularly in Europe and the United States, absorbed a substantial influx of specialists in nuclear, high-energy, and accelerator physics, including both seasoned scientists and engineers as well as promising graduate students and postdoctoral fellows. Many of these emigre researchers went on to assume leadership positions, drive major experimental and theoretical initiatives, and achieve scientific distinction that equaled or even surpassed their accomplishments at home. In this article we explore the defining features of this post Cold War scientific diaspora, assess its impact on Russia research infrastructure and capabilities, and evaluate its enduring contributions to global particle physics collaborations and discoveries.2025-12-03T18:35:21Z14 pages, 3 figures, presented at the 4th International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics, CERN, November 10 - 13, 2025Vladimir Shiltsev