https://arxiv.org/api/+M/BrbfNINrNcgjIhvhIcCYDsJo 2026-11-12T03:43:29Z 5777 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04918v2 2026-11-02T15:36:31Z

Several objections have been raised against the scientificity of multiverse scenarios. This chapter defends the scientificity of certain multiverse scenarios by distinguishing fragmented from holistic multiverses. Concepts of multiverse used in physics are almost always holistic: they embed universes within a broader, unifying physical or metaphysical multiversal structure that can, in principle, leave empirical signatures inside the universes. I develop a classification of such signatures and show how it applies to a number of scenarios from quantum theory, cosmology, and string theory. The framework clarifies why objections such as the `this universe' objection and a newly articulated generalization, the epistemic isolation objection, fail against scientifically motivated multiverses.

2025-09-05T08:33:04Z Chapter draft for the Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy and the Multiverse Baptiste Le Bihan http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15387v4 2026-10-31T00:01:45Z

Many have have taken in hand to write a treatise on the Star of Bethlehem, particularly on Kepler's explanation as a stellar birth, triggered by Mars joining a great conjunction (a meeting of Jupiter and Saturn), as he observed it in October 1604. It is the aim of my short treatise to introduce, at a hopefully well digestible level, into underlying antiquity's concepts of physics, astrology, and astronomy around the time of Christ's birth and to demonstrate their essential developments up to the early modern period. In the latter, Kepler played a significant role. His contributions enabled him to calculate back to the year 7 BC with astonishing precision, locating a triple great conjunction in Pisces, which was then complemented by Mars. This is confirmed by both Babylonian tradition and modern astronomy. The following background provided may be specifically helpful for a more theologically oriented audience, also because the controversy surrounding "geocentric" and "heliocentric" world systems (Copernicus) is touched upon. And, because the overall context raises questions for theology, with which the epilogue concludes.

2025-09-18T19:52:48Z in German language Stephan F. Huckemann http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41944v1 2026-10-30T16:03:31Z

Relativistic theory and experiments teach us that causal influences are constrained by the speed of light. Deterministic theories incorporate this lesson in $\textit{functional}$ terms: whether an event occurs or not is functionally determined by events that occur in its immediate causal past. In this paper we suggest a natural generalization of this constraint that applies to probabilistic theories: the $\textit{probability}$ that an event occurs is to be functionally determined by the $\textit{probability}$ of the event-occurrences in its immediate causal past. This constraint differs from Bell's criterion of local causality and turns out to imply it only under an additional assumption that requires history to be, in a sense, $\textit{ir}$relevant. Bell-inequality-violating quantum phenomena are thus arguably $\textit{not}$ in tension with relativity, locality, "statistical independence", nor with a supposed "realism". What they instead show is that history is, in a sense, $\textit{relevant}$.

2026-10-30T16:03:31Z 33 pages + references; 2 figures Sebastian Horvat http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21715v3 2026-10-30T15:00:04Z

This paper argues that dataset structure is important in image recognition tasks (among other tasks). Specifically, we focus on the nature and genesis of correlational structure in the actual datasets upon which DNNs are trained. We argue that DNNs are implementing a widespread methodology in condensed matter physics and materials science that focuses on mesoscale correlation structures that live between fundamental atomic/molecular scales and continuum scales. Specifically, we argue that DNNs that are successful in image classification must be discovering high order correlation functions. It is well-known that DNNs successfully generalize in apparent contravention of standard statistical learning theory. We consider the implications of our discussion for this puzzle.

2025-11-18T18:38:21Z 37 pages, 12 figures Robert W. Batterman James F. Woodward http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09567v8 2026-10-30T10:01:30Z

The laws of physics do not label molecules as genes or physical patterns as computer programs. Yet some configurations are copied and, through shared machinery, determine what other structures are built. Can we identify these information carriers without knowing beforehand what they are? We formulate their joint identification with hereditary organisation as the inverse problem of heredity. We introduce Causal Structure Sets (CSS), which represent persistent physical structures and their realised causal ancestry without preassigning hereditary roles. Our candidate criterion seeks coherent families exhibiting replication, variation, variant-dependent translation and continuing lineages. A conditional reconstruction of recipe transmission shows how the criterion can identify a family of transmitted knowledge under explicit physical assumptions. In an Avida-like digital-evolution simulator, we construct CSSs of 848,000-884,000 nodes per run from recorded dynamics and intervention replay. A restricted role-blind search finds candidate families of 4-6 instruction types in development runs. Applied unchanged to 40 previously unseen seeds, the method finds families in all 39 runs with births; 96.2% of 30,422 program swaps yield division times characteristic of the inserted program. The preregistered five-part test nevertheless fails on one endpoint in two runs: the reference definition excludes a heritable program without an assigned phenotype. These results establish computational feasibility and reproducibility of candidate detections in one simulated world, not the criterion's general specificity. CSS opens a route to discovering unfamiliar hereditary organisation, and ultimately to understanding how information-bearing systems emerge, persist and evolve.

2024-07-06T16:37:01Z 131 pages, 17 figures. Major V8 revision: first computational implementation of CSS in digital evolution, including role-blind searches, causal interventions, and a preregistered 40-seed held-out test (one endpoint failed in two runs). Adds paired recipe reconstructions, formal refinements, and reproducibility methods Wouter van der Wijngaart http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39107v1 2026-10-29T00:46:26Z

We consider symmetric hyperbolicity and well-posedness in the context of natural equations, which are closed subobjects of jet bundles over natural bundles. We show how non-natural equations can be "naturalized", and we discuss how a precise version of "minimal coupling" offers a (provably unique, up to isomorphism) method for constructing natural equations from certain equations defined on a single manifold. We discuss how to define symmetrizers, hyperbolizations, and constraints for minimally coupled natural equations, and we show how these can be used to recover standard existence and uniqueness results, relative to any choice of background structure (a metric, for minimally coupled systems). Additionally, we show that minimal coupling and naturality together imply that the causal cones associated with a (first order, quasilinear, minimally coupled) naturally symmetric hyperbolic natural equation must always coincide with the metric lightcones, and that a certain rank-2 tensor, associates with a natural hyperbolization, must always be divergence free relative to the associated Levi-Civita derivative operator.

2026-10-29T00:46:26Z 19 pages Eleanor March James Owen Weatherall http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17586v2 2026-10-27T14:52:49Z

Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics is the science of time as it manifests itself in the transient or steady entropy producing dynamical condition of many-body systems. Beyond the vivid multiformity of the phenomena themselves, three foundational issues lie at its heart. The first question concerns the very origin of entropy production, which gives macroscopic processes their direction and thereby defines the arrow of time: how does an atomistic mechanical world give rise to dissipated heat, thermalization, and time-reversal symmetry breaking? The second asks why, far beyond the familiar behavior of equilibrium systems, driving or agitation may produce and select stable and functionally rich structures: what is it about far-from-equilibrium, low-entropy driving that unleashes the wealth and intricacy of the natural world? The third issue is partly methodological: to determine how, and for which subclass of such wildly diverse nonequilibrium systems, a systematic, unified description and modeling from first principles remains possible. This essay addresses these issues in an informal, semi-popular-science style, offering a personally engaging yet wide-ranging introduction to the complementary roles of entropy production and the less familiar, more recently coined notion of frenesy in the dynamical fluctuations of steadily driven systems. Together, we argue, they provide a more complete starting point for understanding physical time on mesoscopic to macroscopic scales.

2026-08-18T09:50:45Z Semi-popular-science essay; about 40pages, 5 figures. Errors corrected Christian Maes http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30998v2 2026-10-26T06:31:45Z

This oral history interview provides Yakir Aharonov's personal and conceptual recollections from the 1950s to the 2000s, focusing on his academic trajectory, some of his major contributions to quantum foundations, and his perspective on the development of the field. The interview traces Aharonov's academic career through the Technion, University of Bristol, Brandeis University, Yeshiva University, University of South Carolina, Tel Aviv University, George Mason University, and Chapman University. The interview also traces the development of Aharonov's work and collaborations on the EPR paradox, time-energy uncertainty relations, quantum measurement theory, quantum frames of reference, the two-state vector formalism, weak values, protective measurements, and several other contributions. It includes recollections of meetings and discussions with David Bohm, Niels Bohr, John Clauser, Paul Dirac, Rudolf Peierls, Aage Petersen, and Abner Shimony. Also mentioned: David Albert, Jeeva Anandan, Peter Bergmann, Gideon Carmi, Avshalom Elitzur, Dave Finkelstein, Vladimir Fock, Itzhak Kalugai, Ed Lerner, Joel Lebowitz, Stanley Mandelstam, Yuval Ne'eman, Sandu Popescu, Maurice Pryce, Daniel Rohrlich, Nathan Rosen, Joseph Safko, Paul Singer, Daniele Struppa, Leonard Susskind, Lev Vaidman, Chien-Shiung Wu.

2026-10-22T09:39:48Z 29 pages, 2 figures. Oral history interview; accepted for publication in EPJ H Yakir Aharonov Guy Hetzroni http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34297v1 2026-10-25T13:52:56Z

The Babylonian Astronomical Diaries record the sky over nearly six centuries. Many tablets are broken and have lost their date formula. Experts dated many of them one tablet at a time in the standard edition, Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia (ADART). They used the recorded sky and other evidence, such as year formulas and royal names. Our system automates the astronomical part for all tablets with the same rules. A rule-based parser turns the recorded observations into clauses, short statements with fixed fields. A language model checks them against the text and adds observations that the parser missed. Astronomical tools test the clauses in all 701 years from 626 BCE to AD 75. The system ranks the years by how well they agree with the clauses. The system withholds published dates until its results are final, and the output lists the passages and computed positions behind each candidate year. On 120 dated tablets, the years tied at the top of the ranking include the published year in 96% of cases. For 86 of them, this top group is a single year, the published year in 84. In 119 of the 120, the reported candidate set contains it. For 56 undated entries of ADART IV, the system gives ranked candidate years. For each tablet, the results show how far astronomy alone narrows the year. An interactive page at https://tingyuansen.github.io/Babylonian_Dating/ follows each tablet and links the code, protocol and results.

2026-10-25T13:52:56Z 15 pages, 6 figures, 7 tables, including the SI Appendix. Code, data and interactive page: https://github.com/tingyuansen/Babylonian_Dating and https://tingyuansen.github.io/Babylonian_Dating/ Lucas Carrit Delgado Pinheiro Yuan-Sen Ting Jon Clindaniel Lu Li Yingbin Liang Ness Shroff http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34178v1 2026-10-25T09:16:45Z

Favourable oppositions of Mars gave nineteenth-century astronomers recurring opportunities to test claims about the planet, while telegraphic news and newspaper reprinting carried those claims well beyond the professional observatories. Historians have established the importance of these events to the development of mass-media astronomy. Here, I examine a related question in the Australian colonial press: how did the standing of particular claims change as brief reports, local responses and fuller accounts appeared at different times? Drawing on colonial newspaper coverage from 1875 to 1899, I follow episodes surrounding the major Mars oppositions of 1892 and 1894. Reports of observations attributed to "Professor Pickering" in 1892 prompted both rapid circulation and immediate scrutiny. In 1894, a cable about William W. Campbell's spectroscopic work provoked local disagreement before more detailed accounts became available. These sequences show that a Mars opposition concentrated attention without imposing a uniform progression from anticipation to discovery and subsequent caution. Newspapers carried assessments and renewed speculation at the same time. The Australian case extends work on event astronomy by showing how the timing and form of information arriving in a colonial press network affected the public evaluation of astronomical claims.

2026-10-25T09:16:45Z 8 pages; accepted for publication in Science in Context Richard de Grijs Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34075v1 2026-10-25T05:30:50Z

Special-science explanations often concern distributions rather than individual outcomes. Since higher-level states depend on lower-level processes, what would make a higher-level explanation redundant? I argue that redundancy requires replacement without loss, not merely a reconstruction of individual outcomes. Distributional counterfactual dependence (DCD) identifies how changes in higher-level conditions alter an outcome distribution or a relevant feature of it. Against the background of stochastic supervenience, I distinguish this explanatory role from the dependence of higher-level states on lower-level bases. A replacement must be specified independently of the distribution to be explained and preserve the same counterfactual pattern at the grain and across the conditions relevant to the question. Applications to wage distributions, cognitive load, and selection clarify this requirement. A hypothetical comparison shows how a lower-level model can preserve the explanation and why matching selected outcome statistics may not suffice. DCD thus describes one form of non-reductive explanation that depends on counterfactual organization rather than additional higher-level productive powers.

2026-10-25T05:30:50Z Youheng Zhang http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32569v1 2026-10-23T12:53:42Z

Classical natural philosophy sought the natural law governing the motion of free bodies long before daring to construct the appropriate mathematical formalism. Following this longstanding methodological perspective, in the present work General Relativity is reconstructed from operational and dynamical principles, rather than taking spacetime geometry as its starting point. The \textit{conatus} of a massive free particle is identified with its natural tendency to follow a worldline of stationary proper time, which, under the appropriate local conditions, corresponds to a maximum of its proper time, whereas gravitation is interpreted as the \textit{potentia} of matter to modify the local rate of proper time. By requiring the exact validity of Galilean free fall, the weak-field static invariant is determined. The gravitational field of moving sources is subsequently obtained by Lorentz-transforming the elementary static solution and causally superposing the retarded contributions of infinitesimal source elements. The resulting linearized field equations coincide with those of General Relativity in the harmonic gauge. Finally, imposing general energy-momentum conservation together with the requirement of second-order field equations yields--- within the class of theories satisfying the stated assumptions and by virtue of Lovelock's theorem---the unique covariant completion represented by Einstein's field equations. Within this construction, geometry is not postulated from the outset; instead, it emerges as the final mathematical synthesis of operational dynamics based on proper time, inertia, and free fall.

2026-10-23T12:53:42Z 30 pages Symmetry2026, 18(10), 1692 Jaume de Haro Emilio Elizalde 10.3390/sym18101692 http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29804v1 2026-10-21T14:29:35Z

In quantum mechanics, conservation laws are usually understood only statistically and only in the context of unitary evolution: during such evolution, if an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian, its expectation value and Born-rule probability distribution remain unchanged. Individual measurement outcomes, however, disrupt even this weak form of statistical conservation. Recently, though, it has been argued that a stronger, non-statistical form of conservation, valid at the level of individual measurement outcomes, can be recovered. The proposal relies on the claim that any superposition of eigenstates of a conserved quantity must ultimately be prepared relative to another physical system, which serves as the relevant reference frame and remains correlated with the system being prepared. On this enlarged description, the change observed in the measured system is claimed to be exactly compensated by an opposite change in the preparer, thereby restoring conservation at the level of individual measurement outcomes. We analyze this proposal and argue that it faces significant conceptual difficulties. We show that the proposed mechanism is not adequately justified and, moreover, does not establish conservation in individual measurement outcomes as claimed.

2026-10-21T14:29:35Z 17 pages E. Okon D. Sudarsky M. Wiedemann http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28764v1 2026-10-20T18:03:53Z

This article reexamines the striking conceptual and formal parallels between Josiah Willard Gibbs Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics and Albert Einstein first paper on statistical mechanics. Although their derivations follow different paths, both arrive at the canonical distribution and construct closely related theoretical frameworks for thermal equilibrium. Each offers a mechanical grounding of the second law of thermodynamics and defines temperature as the quantity that equalises when systems exchange energy, thereby characterising equilibrium without recourse to kinetic theory. In both cases, the constructions rely on general mechanical principles, most notably energy conservation and Liouville theorem, combined with probabilistic reasoning, and deliberately set aside Boltzmann kinetic approach. Whereas Gibbs treatise quickly became a canonical reference, Einstein 1902 paper remained marginal in both physics and its historiography for more than half a century. Focusing primarily on that first article, while also considering the closely related papers of 1903 and 1904, the present study reviews the main historiographical interpretations of their reception. Particular attention is given to Paul Hertz two critical articles of 1910, which identified a close affinity between Gibbs's and Einstein's approaches and played an important role in Einstein subsequent distancing from his early statistical programme, following a private meeting in Basel that Einstein sought in preference to a public controversy. Drawing on new archival evidence concerning the rapid European dissemination of Gibbs book in the spring of 1902, the article reassesses the plausibility of Einstein later claim that he was unaware of Gibbs work at the time.

2026-10-20T18:03:53Z Hector Giacomini http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28185v1 2026-10-20T13:21:24Z

We review and analyse quantum information-theoretic approaches to black hole evaporation that purport to bring us closer to a resolution of the black hole information paradox. Our focus is on the Page-time paradox and on the contribution of the Hayden-Preskill model to understanding information release under the assumption of unitary evaporation. In this model, the black hole is taken to be a finite-dimensional quantum system whose dynamics can be represented by a quantum circuit, and its information-processing and communication abilities are studied. We identify the assumptions underlying this modelling and highlight two key features, fast scrambling dynamics and entanglement as a resource, that underpin the information release in the model. We argue that this reasoning exemplifies a broader change in how information is used in black hole physics, in which quantum information theory now provides a useful operational modelling framework. This application avoids earlier philosophical objections insofar as it is not based on epistemic ignorance and does not regard information as a substance. This line of reasoning has become central to the debate and, as such, warrants greater attention from the philosophy of physics community.

2026-10-20T13:21:24Z Aude Corbeel Sebastian De Haro