https://arxiv.org/api/+M/BrbfNINrNcgjIhvhIcCYDsJo 2026-05-16T00:28:58Z 5592 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04192v1 2026-05-05T18:34:18Z

This note examines an apparently unpublished manuscript on special relativity written by Conrad Habicht in 1914 and made available online by the ETH-Bibliothek Zürich in December 2024. To the best of my knowledge, no study of its content has yet been published. Habicht was one of Einstein's closest companions during the Bern years. Between February 1902 and mid-1904 he shared with Einstein many occasions for discussion and companionship in Bern. After leaving the city, he remained in close contact with Einstein through visits, reciprocal stays, and a substantial correspondence extending from the years immediately following 1905 to the eve of the First World War. The manuscript offers a clear and pedagogical presentation of special relativity. Its historical interest lies in the structure of the exposition and in the memory of the theory that the text preserves. Habicht does not present special relativity as an isolated creation beginning from Einstein's 1905 paper alone. He devotes considerable space to the pre-Einsteinian problem situation: the classical principle of relativity, the ether, Fizeau's experiment, Michelson--Morley, Lorentz's theory, the contraction hypothesis, local time, and the privileged system of the stationary ether. Lorentz is treated as the central figure who brought the electrodynamics of moving bodies to its most acute form before Einstein's intervention. This note provides a qualitative description of the manuscript, with particular attention to its structure, its treatment of the relation between classical mechanics and electrodynamics, and the respective roles assigned to Lorentz, Michelson--Morley, Einstein, and Minkowski.

2026-05-05T18:34:18Z Hector Giacomini http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18180v2 2026-05-05T00:37:32Z

We examine the English translation of Albert Einstein's groundbreaking 1925 paper on Bose-Einstein condensation. We guide readers to execute the calculations Einstein outlined for the specific heat above the condensation temperature, correct some numerical errors, and compare his formula with a different one published in the American Journal of Physics in 2004. The history of the acceptance of Einstein's theory will be summarized.

2026-04-20T12:36:22Z Submitted to the American Journal of Physics on April 20, 2026. Comment on https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1764562. Link to digital scans of Einstein's handwritten manuscript added Frank Wang http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02991v1 2026-05-04T16:57:19Z

Vishaps -- dragon stones -- discovered in the Armenian Highlands convey a remarkable message about the spiritual and social character of their epoch, c. 4000 BC. The unexpected bimodal distribution of their elevations indicates the deliberate, labor-intensive placement of these massive stones -- some weighing up to 7--9 tons -- in locations where the period suitable for construction activities at high altitudes was extremely limited. Their positions, correlated with nodes of previously identified prehistoric irrigation systems, support the interpretation that they were dedicated to a cult of water. This evidence points to the existence of an organized and unified society capable of sustaining and maintaining such a resource-intensive cult.

2026-05-04T16:57:19Z 17 pages, 7 figures; npj Heritage Science (accepted for publication) Vahe Gurzadyan Arsen Bobokhyan 10.1038/s40494-026-02603-7 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02621v1 2026-05-04T14:11:24Z

A recent article by Lohmiller \& Slotine (Proc.\ R.\ Soc.\ A \textbf{482}: 20250413) claims that the Schrödinger equation can be solved exactly using only classical least action and classical fluid density, asserting that this formulation avoids semiclassical approximations. We show that their mathematical derivation contains a foundational error. By neglecting the spatial derivatives of the probability density amplitude, the authors inadvertently omit the quantum potential -- the term originally identified by Madelung and later emphasised by Bohm. Consequently, their proposed equivalence is not exact but rather constitutes the standard semiclassical approximation. We further demonstrate that each of the paper's illustrative examples either belongs to a class where the quantum potential vanishes identically due to the geometry of the problem, or recovers the correct quantum result by importing quantum eigenfunctions through the initial conditions, thereby concealing the error.

2026-05-04T14:11:24Z Comment on arXiv:2405.06328 Gabor Vattay http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02239v1 2026-05-04T05:30:53Z

We compute the mean interval between successive returns of the apparent geocentric solar longitude $λ$ to a fixed value $L \in \{0^\circ, 45^\circ, 90^\circ, \ldots, 315^\circ\}$, averaged over a multi-millennium window; this gives eight ``mean years'' against which calendar leap rules can be tuned: four cardinal-point years (equinoxes and solstices); four cross-quarter years. The construction is built on Meeus's low-precision solar theory (Astronomical Algorithms, 2nd ed., 1998), itself a low-order truncation of Newcomb's Tables of the Sun, re-expanded around J2000.0. Where Meeus presents polynomial coefficients without justification, we draw on Smart's Textbook on Spherical Astronomy (6th ed., revised by Green, 1977) for the underlying derivations. Numerical accuracy is validated against the cardinal-point intervals tabulated in Meeus, More Mathematical Morsels, 2002. We close with a derivation of the secular drift equation, showing that, regardless of how well a leap rule is tuned, the slow shrinkage of the tropical year produces a quadratic cumulative error that reaches one day in $\sim$57,000 years for any fixed intercalation rule.

2026-05-04T05:30:53Z 15 pages, 18 references, 6 figures, 5 tables Daniel Quigley http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19323v4 2026-05-01T14:44:27Z

Any representational enterprise must omit variation in order to function. NASA still uses Newtonian mechanics, though Einstein superseded Newton, and the standard picture of scientific progress cannot explain how. A description that omitted nothing would be identical to its subject and would explain nothing. This paper argues that omission is not a defect but the central structural feature of any enterprise that builds representations from incomplete information. The key concept is projection: a principled mapping from underlying complexity to a descriptive space that partitions states into equivalence classes, omits within-class variation, and makes patterns visible that would otherwise be lost. Projection is simultaneously revelatory and constitutive: it makes genuine invariants tractably accessible while bringing into being the concepts through which they become expressible. The paper distinguishes vertical cases, in which earlier projections survive as limiting cases of more refined successors with recoverable omission, from horizontal cases, in which omission is constitutive, and invariants are accessible only at the level of the projection that defines them. The framework accounts for persistent pluralism in mature sciences, treats the renormalization group as a systematic implementation of the invariant-tracking criterion, and defends a level-relative realism on which higher-level projections reveal genuine structural features of the world. The deepest claim is an inversion of the standard picture: perspectival structure is not a concession to complexity but the condition for invariant detection. A world rich in invariants cannot be exhausted by a single projection.

2026-03-17T13:58:56Z Harry Sticker http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00406v1 2026-05-01T04:54:54Z

Selection artefacts are common in science. A method of selecting samples from a larger population may produce bias, in either direction. It may induce correlations between variables independent in the full population, or mask correlations between variables dependent in the full population. Here we propose a surprising application of these familiar ideas. We argue that they are relevant to puzzling correlations uncovered in quantum theory by John Stewart Bell (Bell 1964). In the light of Bell's work and subsequent experiments it is widely believed that the quantum world is 'nonlocal', in apparent tension with relativity. Many hold that the only alternative is to abandon 'realism', the view that there is an objective world independent of measurement. We propose instead that Bell correlations are selection artefacts, in tension neither with relativity nor realism.

2026-05-01T04:54:54Z 19 pages, 6 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2602.16985 Huw Price http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21805v2 2026-04-30T17:43:42Z

I show that the clock ambiguity cannot be solved by a purely relational condition like the noninteraction condition, and it is even stronger, extending to evolution laws. The ambiguity is solved by specifying the physical meaning of observables. Page and Wootters (1983) showed how time and dynamics can emerge from entanglement within a stationary quantum system containing a clock. The clock ambiguity problem is that, from a purely relational stance and without fixing a clock-world split, the emergence is ambiguous, resulting in any possible history (Albrecht 1995). I show that the ambiguity is stronger than previously recognized. Under the relational stance, it extends from histories to the evolution laws themselves. The spectrum of any ideal clock uniformizes the spectra of the world's evolution operators, leaving only the dimension of the Hilbert spaces as invariant information. Fixing the clock-world split can solve the ambiguity, but this would block spacetime symmetries. One might want to remove the ambiguity up to a unitary equivalence by imposing noninteraction, as in Marletto and Vedral (2017). But once the clock spectrum uniformizes the world spectrum, unitary equivalence becomes too coarse to distinguish any two possible world dynamics, which is the result proved here. Thus a purely relational condition such as noninteraction is insufficient. Nor can all different decompositions be regarded as equally valid perspectives, since then records would not be correlated with the events they record, and empirical knowledge would be impossible. The resolution is therefore not to embrace the ambiguity, but to recognize what a bare reading of the Page-Wootters structure omits: the physical meaning of the operators.

2026-04-23T16:02:12Z Comments welcome! Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17150v2 2026-04-30T14:24:07Z

I argue that if a special science satisfies certain key assumptions that are familiar from physicalist accounts of the special sciences and from physics, then its causal regularities have an associated notion of entropy, and that this causal entropy cannot decrease from a robust cause to its effect. Due to its analogy with the second laws of thermodynamics and statistical physics, I call the latter conclusion the causal second law. In this paper, I clarify the key assumptions, prove the causal second law, give sufficient conditions for causal entropy increase, relate the causal second law to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, and argue that the reversibility objection does not threaten it. In addition, I claim that the causal second law is compatible with a non-metaphysical understanding of supervenience and the open systems view, argue that it does not imply a causal time arrow, reflect on relaxing the robustness condition, question whether it is necessary to invoke thermodynamics to show that special sciences' time arrows exist, and discuss a transition-relative-frequency-based, special-science-internal characterization of causal regularities.

2026-02-19T07:50:42Z Published in Nous: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/nous.70042 Nous 2026; 00:1--17 Balazs Gyenis 10.1111/nous.70042 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06346v2 2026-04-30T10:33:38Z

Certain approaches to quantum gravity, such as the one based on the concept of purely virtual particles (fakeons), sacrifice the cause-effect relation at very small scales to reconcile renormalizability with unitarity. Other developments have also urged caution regarding the idea of causality as a fundamental principle. In this paper, we examine the problem from multiple perspectives, including locality and predictivity, and extend the existing skepticism in several directions. Emphasizing the impact of unruly "disruptors", we point out that the illusory arrow of time associated with causality and predictivity is inherently statistical. This renders the cause-effect relation strained at the microscopic level. We also show that causation is a borderline concept that demands belief in entities which can act on nature without being part of it. Ultimately, not only is renouncing microcausality a reasonable price to pay for a consistent and predictive theory of quantum gravity (as is the one based on the fakeon idea), but the very notion of causality is misleading. Resting as it does on metaphysical assumptions, it should therefore be abandoned in fundamental physics.

2026-01-09T22:55:42Z 35 pages, 1 figure; v2: minor changes, Found Phys version Found Phys 56, 27 (2026) Damiano Anselmi 10.1007/s10701-026-00928-8 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27525v1 2026-04-30T07:28:29Z

We prove that the Lorentz--FitzGerald contraction is the unique deformation of a resonant cavity moving through a mechanical wave medium that preserves spherical-harmonic phase closure. For a cavity moving at speed $v = βc$ through a medium supporting nondispersive wave propagation at speed $c$, the round-trip phase of an internal ray at angle $θ$ to the motion depends on the boundary radius $r(θ)$ according to $Φ(θ) = 2k\,r(θ)\sqrt{1-β^2\sin^2θ}/(1-β^2)$. Requiring $Φ(θ)$ to be independent of $θ$ -- the necessary condition for retaining a spherical-harmonic eigenstructure -- uniquely fixes the Lorentzian aspect ratio \[ \frac{a_\parallel}{a_\perp} = \frac{1}γ = \sqrt{1-β^2}. \] Substituting this unique boundary into the round-trip time yields the resonant period dilation $T = γT_0$, without additional assumptions. Both results -- contraction and dilation -- follow from a single mechanical constraint: preservation of eigenstructure under motion. This is the missing uniqueness theorem of the constructive relativity program initiated by FitzGerald, Lorentz, and Heaviside: the proof that Lorentzian kinematics are not merely consistent with, but uniquely required by, phase closure in a mechanical wave medium.

2026-04-30T07:28:29Z 7 pages Shiva Meucci 10.5281/zenodo.19880350 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00057v1 2026-04-29T22:24:38Z

In his 1972 book Science At the Crossroads, Helbert Dingle attacked the consistency of special relativity through a fallacious argument championed by the crank community even to this day. Dingle's affair is a curious chapter in the history of physics and, more generally, science. We briefly review Dingle's case from a historical and didactic perspective.

2026-04-29T22:24:38Z The Physics Educator, Vol 7, 2550004, 2025 Justo Pastor Lambare 10.1142/S2661339525500040 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24829v1 2026-04-27T17:00:06Z

The Varenna school is a hub where generations of physicists, including numerous Nobel laureates, have shaped the field, often through collaborative exchanges across political and cultural boundaries. We examine the scientific legacy of Enrico Fermi and its influence on modern atomic, molecular, and optical physics. Beginning with Fermi's 1954 lectures at the Varenna school, key developments are traced from high-energy physics to laser spectroscopy, precision metrology, and the control of ultracold atoms. Milestones such as Doppler-free spectroscopy, optical frequency combs, Bose-Einstein condensation, and degenerate Fermi gases are highlighted as turning points leading to quantum simulation and quantum computation. Fermi's early advocacy for building a computer, rather than buying it, can be viewed as a precursor to today's efforts in quantum science and technologies. This historical trajectory and legacy continues to inform current research in quantum matter and information science.

2026-04-27T17:00:06Z This manuscript has been submitted to appear in the Proceedings of the Course 214 "Quantum Computers and Simulators with Atoms" of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" (Varenna, July 2024) Vladislav Gavryusev Massimo Inguscio http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24825v1 2026-04-27T15:04:00Z

The second law of thermodynamics, which deals with irreversibility and makes the theory so special, is usually considered empirical. The definition of equilibrium as an attractor, on the other hand, requires a postulate. This article shows that both are actually already contained, even if hidden, in the fundamental principles of neopositivism, which are widely accepted in all fields of science. In particular, from the definition of information as a truth that can only come from an observation but cannot be redundant, we obtain Clausius' inequality.

2026-04-27T15:04:00Z Didier Lairez http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24503v1 2026-04-27T14:06:04Z

Total solar eclipses (TSEs) offer a unique opportunity to observe the solar atmosphere, detect limb phenomena, and accurately measure the solar radius. Following the TSE in 1733, Wassenius first reported the existence of prominences to the scientific community. Wassenius' original manuscript is held in the Royal Academy Archives of Sweden; this study translates his report and documents the associated source materials and local eclipse visibility. The solar radius (R_Sun) during the TSE in 1733 are 696250 +/- 170 km and 959.99 +/- 0.24" in the absolute and apparent scales, respectively. This result contrasts with the modern standard (helioseismic) R_Sun of 695780 +/- 160 km and 959.34 +/- 0.22"; however, it is consistent with the solar radius recorded in 1715. The observed prominences are located at +23.5 +/- 22.5°, +66.5 +/- 22.5°, and -68.5 +/- 22.5° in the heliographic latitude. The appearance of prominences at such high latitudes contrasts with the sunspot butterfly diagram for 1725-1750, confirming 1733 as a solar minimum. These high-latitude prominences can potentially be attributed to the so-called 'polar rush' prominences that appear a few years after a solar minimum. If they are categorised as 'polar rush' prominences, the solar minimum must be re-dated to before 1733 May. Furthermore, the latitudes of at least two of the prominences reported by Wassenius enable their classification as quiescent prominences, suggesting the presence of a polarity inversion line in the polar regions in early 1733.

2026-04-27T14:06:04Z 20 pages and 5 figures The Astrophysical Journal, 2026 Hisashi Hayakawa Mitsuru Sôma Noortje Peek Jean-Pierre Rozelot Stanislav Gunár Alexei Pevtsov 10.3847/1538-4357/ae6451