https://arxiv.org/api/+M/BrbfNINrNcgjIhvhIcCYDsJo 2026-09-10T18:16:28Z 5718 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02949v1 2026-09-01T23:00:07Z

This paper discusses the metaphor, originating with Whittaker, according to which Maxwell's model of molecular vortices was the scaffolding by means of which the equations of electromagnetism were erected, removed afterwards without consequence for the building. It is argued here that the metaphor describes badly what happened, and it is shown that whoever upholds it today transcribes, within that same text, the quotations that belie it. The paper examines what was actually removed in 1865, which materials of the model still operate inside the equations under other names, and proposes in its place the figure of the template, taken from sheet-metal layout work. The discussion is situated with respect to the work of Daniel M. Siegel and Cameron Lazaroff-Puck, who maintain from the history of science the constitutive character of the model. It closes with a criterion for telling one case from the other.

2026-09-01T23:00:07Z 6 pages. Also available at OSF, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6X2FY María Florentina Mendoza Urán http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30871v2 2026-09-01T12:53:32Z

We reformulate the relaxation problem in statistical mechanics by making explicit what are the \emph{operational} objects subject to relaxation: the local time statistics of the recorded signal $Z(t)$. These local time statistics are simply the estimated histograms of observations $\{Z(t_i)\}_{i=1}^M$ performed at uniformly random times $\{t_i\}_{i=1}^M$ by a clockless observer. The subject of prediction is a belief about a future fresh out-of-sample reading of a measurement outcome whose distribution is inferred from the mathematical model believed to be true. For finite bounded systems of $N\ge 1$ degrees of freedom global irreversible relaxation of predictions can occur but special initial conditions exist. The form of the predictions depends on certain loss functions whose choice is up to the particular observer. Finally, entropy is given a learning interpretation as mutual information between the observer and the unknown past of the system under consideration and, in complete generality, its stationary value depends on the information available.

2026-08-31T14:32:36Z 18 pages, 5 figures Giuseppe Del Vecchio Del Vecchio http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00075v1 2026-08-31T07:17:44Z

The apparent incompatibility between foreknowledge and free will is traditionally formulated in terms of the implication of knowledge of a future event for the freedom of that event. This paper reexamines the problem using the notions of causal order and physical determination provided by modern physics. I consider measurements of two entangled particles at spacelike-separated events, where a measurement outcome is taken to be free if it is not determined by the previous history of the part of the universe accessible to it. Relativity allows the temporal order of the two measurements to be reversed between reference frames while preserving their causal independence. Quantum correlations nevertheless allow an observer at one measurement event to know the outcome at the other. I show that there is, therefore, a frame in which an observer possesses foreknowledge of a measurement outcome that remains free in this sense. The argument demonstrates that epistemic access to a future event need not be grounded in physical conditions that determine it.

2026-08-31T07:17:44Z Eliyahu Zvi Engelberg http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29806v1 2026-08-30T14:13:13Z

Quantum resonances and black-hole quasinormal modes (QNMs) are described by closely related mathematics: radiative boundary conditions, analytic continuation of Green functions or resolvents, poles on nonphysical sheets, and non-self-adjoint spectral representations. This article does not introduce that equivalence but reconstructs its genealogy. Nuclear resonance theory grew from radioactive decay, reaction cross sections, metastable compound states, and complex energies, whereas black-hole perturbation theory grew from spacetime stability and causal response. We place the two developments on a common chronology, from Sommerfeld's radiation condition and early nuclear-decay theory through Regge--Wheeler perturbations, Vishveshwara's 1968 dissertation and 1970 papers, Press's 1971 quasi-normal terminology, and the independent Aguilar--Balslev--Combes theory of analytic dilation, then follow their later mathematical reunification in scattering-resonance theory. Alongside the chronology, we give a working dictionary relating no-incoming and horizon-ingoing/infinity-outgoing conditions, pole energy and complex frequency, width and damping rate, residues and excitation factors, and nonresonant background with branch-cut and prompt contributions. The aim is to make the cross-disciplinary equivalence operational without flattening its history, and to distinguish mathematical equivalence from historical genealogy.

2026-08-30T14:13:13Z 40 pages, 1 figure Okuto Morikawa http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17364v2 2026-08-28T01:40:38Z

Ostrogradsky's theorem shows that higher-derivative dynamical systems inevitably yields a Hamiltonian featuring a ghost mode that is unbounded from below. However, we argue that this theorem is inapplicable to gravitational systems, as the Hamiltonian constraint, which encodes background independence by dictating that the total Hamiltonian vanishes, holds strictly. The ghost mode obeying this constraint constitutes an indispensable component in the construction of space and time. Nevertheless, it should be underscored that the use of the weak-field (graviton) approximation, being a background-dependent scheme presupposing the existence of absolute time, invokes this theorem; consequently, it is allowed only in the domain below the Planck scale, where second derivative terms dominate.

2026-08-18T04:32:25Z 9 pages, a reference added Ken-ji Hamada http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14703v3 2026-08-27T17:37:56Z

In this review article we summarize all experiments claiming quantum computational advantage to date. Our review highlights challenges, loopholes, and refutations appearing in subsequent work to provide a complete picture of the current statuses of these experiments. In addition, we also discuss theoretical computational advantage in example problems such as approximate optimization and recommendation systems. Finally, we review recent experiments in quantum error correction -- the biggest frontier to reach experimental quantum advantage in Shor's algorithm.

2024-12-19T10:16:49Z 32 pages, 210 references Quantum 10, 2198 (2026) Ryan LaRose 10.22331/q-2026-09-01-2198 http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17212v2 2026-08-27T16:26:56Z

I review the works of Gärdenfors (1990) and Scorzato (2013) and show that their combination provides an elegant solution of Goodman's new riddle of induction. The solution is based on two main ideas: (1) clarifying what is expected from a solution: understanding that philosophy of science is a science itself, with the same limitations and strengths as other scientific disciplines; (2) understanding that the concept of complexity of a model's assumptions and the concept of direct measurements must be characterized together. Although both measurements and complexity have been the subject of a vast literature, within the philosophy of science, essentially no other attempt has been made to combine them. The widespread expectation, among modern philosophers, that Goodman's new riddle cannot be solved is not defensible without a serious exploration of such a natural approach. A clarification of this riddle has always been very important, but it has become even more crucial in the age of AI.

2025-07-23T05:11:22Z multiple clarifications and expanded arguments Luigi Scorzato http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27279v1 2026-08-27T15:53:18Z

The 4th International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics spanned two decades, from approximately 1980 to 2000. In this opening keynote lecture, I survey developments in particle physics from the prehistory of the $J/ψ$ discovery to the early nineteen-eighties. I offer context for the contributions that follow in the symposium program.

2026-08-27T15:53:18Z 16 pages, 3 figures, 4th International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics at CERN, November 10--13, 2025 Chris Quigg http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26873v1 2026-08-27T09:35:07Z

In this essay I will make a non-exhaustive survey of the role of scientists, politicians, and the military in the development and use of the Bomb in the thirty years following the beginning of the United States Manhattan Project. I will be mainly focusing on facts or documents that have gradually fallen into oblivion, but that in my opinion are important to develop a critical view of the past responsibilities, and to consciously address the present dramatic situation of worldwide wars, that may yield again to the use of the Bomb.

2026-08-27T09:35:07Z 10 pages, no figures Alberto Girlando http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26474v1 2026-08-27T00:05:57Z

Non-relativistic objective collapse theories have been remarkably successful in addressing the conceptual problems of standard quantum mechanics. Despite substantial efforts, the project of extending them to the relativistic domain remains burdened by significant conceptual objections and technical challenges, often taken to cast doubt on the viability of the program as a whole. On the conceptual side, relativistic collapse theories have been claimed to face challenges involving tension between instantaneous collapse and relativity, frame-dependence of property values and probabilities, the possibility of superluminal signaling and the failure of narratability. On the technical side, persistent infinities, difficulties in constructing fully covariant frameworks and the apparent need for non-standard fields have hindered the development of workable models. In this paper, we offer a systematic rebuttal of the conceptual objections and provide a structured account of the remaining technical challenges. We conclude that relativistic collapse theories do provide a promising route toward a fully relativistic quantum framework that overcomes the conceptual limitations of standard quantum theory.

2026-08-27T00:05:57Z 39 pages, 3 figures R. Muciño E. Okon D. Sudarsky M. Wiedemann http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26282v1 2026-08-26T18:08:34Z

We draw on 't Hooft's seminal formulation of the holographic principle to analyse the methodological and conceptual role of information in quantum gravity. We argue that, in 't Hooft's work and in later developments, information functions as a substantive guiding principle. We distinguish three aspects of this role: First, holographic bounds on the amount of information that can be stored in a region function as theory selection criteria that constrain viable quantum gravity theories. Second, holography functions as a principle of theoretical equivalence: the bulk and boundary theories must describe the same physical content, even though 't Hooft privileges a more fundamental, lower-dimensional, and potentially deterministic boundary description. Third, the distribution and encoding of information connect 't Hooft's proposals to contemporary work on bulk reconstruction, holographic quantum error correction, and ER=EPR, where emergent spacetime structure is tied to patterns of entanglement and redundancy. On the basis of these three roles, we argue that purely epistemic or Shannon-style conceptions of information are inadequate in this context: we instead outline a distinction between what we call maximal and intermediate conceptions that aim to capture the methodological and interpretative roles of information in holographic quantum gravity. We therefore suggest that, in the context of holography and quantum gravity, a more systematic philosophical treatment of the role of information as an interpretation-guiding principle would be desirable.

2026-08-26T18:08:34Z 23 pages, forthcoming in the Festschrift in honour of Gerard 't Hooft on his 80th birthday (World Scientific) Sebastian De Haro Enrico Cinti Aude Corbeel 10.1142/S0217751X26470044 http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25954v1 2026-08-26T16:12:50Z

This paper re-examines the Dark Matter (DM) problem through the lens of physical principles. We first develop a functionalist account and taxonomy of principles. We propose to define principles in terms of their intended functions or purposes. Their argumentative force boils down to context-sensitive and often tentative reasons for believing them adequate for those purposes. In research contexts in which novel theories or models are sought which push the boundaries of knowledge into new domains, reliance on well-motivated principles as principal building blocks is a historically widespread, natural, and methodologically prudent research strategy---what we'll dub "principled inquiry". In a second step, we apply this methodological machinery to the DM problem. Through detailed analyses of four mainstream DM approaches---supersymmetric WIMPs, axions, sterile neutrinos, and primordial black holes---we substantiate four claims. (C1) The DM paradigm is formed by the framework of possibilities, circumscribed by a shared cluster of regulative and constitutive principles of gravitational and non-gravitational physics. (C2) Besides those common principles, the four DM models also depart from other principles of orthodox physics in distinct ways. (C3) They do so to different degrees---displaying different forms and extents of "minimal mutilation" with respect to some of the principles of established non-gravitational physics. (C4) The guidelines of principled inquiry clarify the sense in which the DM problem constitutes an ever-more disconcerting crisis: worries are growing that the principles on which DM researchers have routinely and rationally relied may have run out of heuristic steam. Pressure is mounting to "leave no stone unturned" (Bertone and Tait 2018): scientists ought to increasingly explore ideas that stray more radically from the cautious explorations of principled inquiry.

2026-08-26T16:12:50Z 56 pages Patrick Duerr James Read http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02926v1 2026-08-26T05:40:34Z

The astronomical programme sponsored by the Saljuq Sultan Malikshah I in the late eleventh century occupies an important place in the history of Islamic astronomy. Umar Khayyam was a principal participant in this programme, which produced the Jalali or Maliki calendar and appears also to have resulted in a broader set of astronomical tables known as the Zij-i Malikshahi. A 100-star catalogue traditionally associated with these tables survives in the anonymous Arabic compendium Dustur al-munajjimin, preserved in the unique manuscript BnF Arabe 5968. This study distinguishes the catalogue from the Jalali calendar and from the lost or unidentified complete Zij-i Malikshahi, reconstructs its historical and manuscript context, and examines the provenance of BnF Arabe 5968. It presents a complete transcription of the catalogue from fols. 224r-225r and a new English translation made directly from the Arabic text, with B. A. Rosenfeld's 1961 Russian translation used as a control. The collation identifies several divergences, including a substantive correction to the longitude of entry 8, and clarifies the planetary temperament abbreviations. Rosenfeld and A. P. Yushkevich observed that 96 of the 100 stellar longitudes correspond to Ptolemaic values increased by about 14 degrees 26 minutes, while 87 latitudes agree with Ptolemy. These correspondences suggest systematic updating of inherited Ptolemaic data rather than 100 wholly independent observations, illustrating the combined roles of observation, computation, transmission, and adaptation in medieval Islamic astronomy.

2026-08-26T05:40:34Z 27 pages, 3 figures, 5 tables, 14 references Rizoi Bakhromzod http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05337v7 2026-08-25T13:06:50Z

We discuss, at a level accessible to a wide audience, including students and teachers of physics and mathematics, the fundamental transition from classical mechanics to wave equations made by Schroedinger a century ago. These historical events clarify the structure and significance of quantum mechanics and are of interest to the global scientific community. Valuable sources for further studies are provided throughout the article.

2026-01-08T19:33:11Z 14 pages, 8 figures, 41 references Sergei K. Suslov http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23255v1 2026-08-24T13:47:27Z

This essay develops a simple conditional argument for many-history ontologies from the fact that life exists. The question is not why our exact evolutionary sequence occurred, but why reality contains the broad class of life-bearing histories at all. If such histories are sufficiently rare, then a single-history ontology makes the existence of life surprising, while an ontology containing many histories can make it unsurprising. In the limiting case, life may be vanishingly unlikely in any one history while almost certain to occur somewhere if many histories are actualized. Everettian quantum mechanics is a natural candidate for this kind of ontology because its multiplicity is not introduced for anthropic purposes, but arises from taking universal unitary quantum mechanics seriously. The Fermi paradox is discussed as pressure against the claim that life is common within a single history.

2026-08-24T13:47:27Z Jonathan Baxter