https://arxiv.org/api/+M/BrbfNINrNcgjIhvhIcCYDsJo 2026-03-22T12:02:56Z 5537 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07674v1 2026-03-08T15:16:02Z

This reply is also a friendly introduction to the impossibility of emergence of preferred structures from the Hamiltonian $\mathsf{H}$ and the unit vector $|ψ\rangle$ only. The obstructions to emergence are illustrated on the concrete construction of a tensor product structure (TPS) from Soulas et al., 2025 (arXiv:2512.07468v2). Soulas et al. offer their TPS as a counterexample to the proof from Stoica, 2022a (arXiv:2102.08620) that structures constructed only from $\mathsf{H}$ and $|ψ\rangle$ either contradict physical observations or can't describe them unambiguously. Soulas et al.'s construction of a unique TPS can't be both invariant and compatible with physical observations, so it can't be a counterexample. Its incompatibility becomes visible by examining how the relation between $|ψ(t)\rangle$ and the TPS, encoding the entanglement, changes in time. Therefore their TPS doesn't refute, but confirms (Stoica, 2022a). Besides this, since Soulas et al.'s method to construct preferred structures consists of choosing their invariants, by the same logic one could claim as well that the masses of elementary particles emerge uniquely just by fixing their values by hand. Soulas et al.'s construction is concrete and can illustrate the major obstructions for emergent structures, confirming them despite doing the best possible to avoid them. This makes it an excellent pedagogical tool to illustrate the trilemma, but also the relational and structural aspects of quantum theory and its symmetries.

2026-03-08T15:16:02Z Comment on arXiv:2512.07468v2 Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16907v1 2026-03-06T06:08:23Z

This supplement documents the intellectual trajectory that led to the Category Mistake framework and the Forward-In-Time-Only (FITO) analysis presented in our recent arXiv papers. The ideas crystallized over fifteen years of research, conversation, and engineering practice -- beginning with a 2014 Stanford EE380 lecture on the physics of time in computing, sharpened through a 2016 email exchange with Leslie Lamport following a Papers We Love presentation of his seminal 1978 paper, and matured through the development of Open Atomic Ethernet (OAE). This document traces the concept development from its origins in the physics of entanglement and background-free time, through the recognition that Lamport's "happened-before" relation embeds a category mistake, to the practical engineering consequences documented in "Why iCloud Fails" and "What Distributed Computing Got Wrong." It is intended as archival supplementary material for future arXiv submission.

2026-03-06T06:08:23Z 21 pages, tufte-handout format, 21 references. Supplementary material for the FITO Category Mistake paper series Paul Borrill http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25276v5 2026-03-05T16:38:07Z

The Standard Model of particle physics is usually cast in symmetry-first terms. On this approach, one begins with a symmetry group and postulates matter fields as objects transforming under its representations, without requiring that the group be grounded in, or derived from, independent geometric structures. Recently, a geometry-first formulation has been proposed, in which the relevant symmetries are not fundamental. In this paper, I extend this approach to two central mechanisms of the Standard Model: spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Yukawa coupling, both essential for particles to acquire mass. These reformulations offer alternative explanations cast in purely geometric terms. In particular, the quantisation of charge arises here as a purely geometric consequence of the tensorial construction of matter fields from the fundamental bundles -- a mechanism that is both more general and more transparent than the usual topological account based on the compactness of symmetry groups. More generally, I argue that a symmetry-first account in terms of principal and associated bundles admits a genuine geometry-first counterpart only under certain strict conditions.

2025-09-28T22:13:28Z 32 pages, 6-page appendix. Comments welcome Henrique Gomes http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04159v1 2026-03-04T15:16:41Z

Can we infer whether all of physical reality began to exist? Several novel results are offered suggesting a negative verdict. First, a common strategy for defending a cosmic beginning involves showing that individual beginningless cosmological models are implausible. This strategy is shown to make an elementary error in confirmation theory. Second, two necessary (but not necessarily sufficient) conditions are offered for a cosmic beginning. Third, three extensions are offered to the Malament-Manchak theorems. The three extensions show that in almost all classical spacetimes, observers cannot collect sufficient data to determine whether the application conditions for the classic singularity theorems are satisfied or whether their spacetime satisfies the two necessary conditions for a cosmic beginning. Lastly, a reply is offered to the objection that the skeptical consequences of the three extensions can be overcome with induction. Importantly, all past singular dust FLRW spacetimes have observationally indistinguishable counterparts which, while sharing a number of important local properties, either do not include a singularity to the past of every point or else do not have the sort of time ordering intuitively required for a cosmic beginning.

2026-03-04T15:16:41Z Daniel Linford http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02978v2 2026-03-04T12:49:37Z

Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) treats quantum states as observer-dependent facts rather than absolute properties. While this relational stance is conceptually attractive, it raises concerns about empirical confirmation, particularly in multi-observer scenarios. Existing responses within RQM focus on securing agreement between observers by strengthening the status, stability, or accessibility of recorded outcomes. However, they leave open a more basic question: what grounds the persistence of an observer across time? Scientific observation presupposes stable records and the capacity to relate outcomes across successive measurements. We argue that the minimal definition of the observer in RQM as a merely interacting physical system is insufficient to support this requirement. We propose a complementary account of the observer that distinguishes physical interaction from informational coherence, and show how this distinction supports empirical confirmation in Wigner's friend-type scenarios.

2026-03-03T13:32:24Z 19 pages, 1 figure Bethany Terris http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16902v1 2026-03-04T12:29:06Z

On April 27, 1900, William Thomson, better known as Lord Kelvin, delivered a visionary speech before the Royal Institution of Great Britain. In it, he presented two unresolved problems which, to him, appeared fundamental and unavoidable at the turn of the 20th century. He compared them to two clouds obscuring our understanding of physics. Dissipating these two clouds would eventually require the development of special relativity and quantum mechanics. This article revisits the second cloud which, contrary to what is often claimed in the literature, did not concern black-body radiation, but rather the specific heat of polyatomic molecules. To clarify this, the article aims to place Kelvin's speech within the historical context of the time and to situate it within the sequence of developments, from Kirchhoff to the first Solvay Conference in 1911, that marked the path of the extraordinary intellectual adventure that led to the birth of quantum mechanics. It will also be shown that Max Planck's initial motivation was not to solve the problem of the so-called "ultraviolet catastrophe."

2026-03-04T12:29:06Z 10 pages, submitted to American Journal of Physics Gilles Montambaux http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03478v1 2026-03-03T19:50:23Z

Traditionally, the Planck constant $h$ makes its debut appearance in quantum physics textbooks in the context of the blackbody radiation law and subsequently as a fundamental ingredient of the physics of the photoelectric effect and the Bohr atom. In this paper we consider an alternative timeline path (which could have taken place several years before the proposal of the Bohr atom) where a classical physics hydrogen atom is studied with dimensional analysis techniques in combination with empirical laws of blackbody radiation. The outcome of this ``classical physicist's'' approach is the identification of the correct fundamental Planck constant and the reconstruction of the energy and size scales of the Bohr atom.

2026-03-03T19:50:23Z 6 pages, no figures. To be published in American Journal of Physics Kostas Glampedakis http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19194v2 2026-03-03T18:19:44Z

It is noteworthy that symmetric teleparallel gravity has attracted considerable attention in recent years. A survey of the literature indicates that this surge of interest became particularly prominent around 2017 and 2018. However, together with my students and collaborators, we published a series of systematic and pioneering papers on this subject between 2004 and 2013. This article aims to clarify the early geometric development of symmetric teleparallel gravity preceding the recent surge of interest in $f(Q)$ gravity. For the sake of completeness and coherence, we will also briefly review our work on this topic carried out after 2018. In the final paragraph, we will write our personal perspectives on the future of symmetric teleparallel geometry.

2026-02-22T13:48:53Z Minor corrections Muzaffer Adak http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02821v1 2026-03-03T10:16:49Z

Annotated English translation of Duleau's "Notice sur A. Fresnel" in Revue encyclopédique, vol.39, pp.558-67 (September 1828), and of the shorter obituary for Fresnel in id., vol.37, pp.316-7.

2026-03-03T10:16:49Z Edited by Gavin R. Putland. 13 pages (5.5in x 210mm), 21 references Alphonse Duleau Gavin R. Putland http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21324v2 2026-03-03T09:44:19Z

There is a question of whether de-idealization is needed for justified use of -- for 'checking' -- idealizations. We argue that the standard philosophical account of de-idealization has become too idealized, but that this does not preclude the possibility of justificatory practices which show how models can be used to make inferences about the world. In turn, motivated by examples in physics, we provide a more expansive and practice-driven account of de-idealization by relaxing the standards for closeness to more realistic theoretical items, identifying at least three kinds of procedures for de-idealization: intra-model, inter-model, and measurement de-idealizations. These examples highlight how idealizations can be -- and indeed have been -- scrutinized within physics without appealing to the philosopher's idealized notion of de-idealization.

2026-02-24T19:44:54Z Accepted for publication at the British Journal for Philosophy of Science. Preprint of March 3 2026. Please cite published version when available Yichen Luo Eugene Y. S. Chua http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02399v1 2026-03-02T21:21:13Z

Standard historiographical approaches to the Scientific Revolution illuminate background conditions but leave three puzzles unresolved: what triggered the initial escalation of inherited tensions, what made early investigative efforts durable, and why natural philosophy became the locus of transformation rather than theology, law, or classical scholarship. This paper develops a causal account by identifying the mechanisms of activation at the individual level and the institutional alignment that converted rare psychological drive into durable research traditions. The trigger architecture operates at two levels. At the individual level, activation occurs when investigators experience inherited puzzles as psychologically intolerable; capture stabilizes inquiry through cognitive, material, and social entanglements; and externalization converts methods into transmissible forms. At the institutional level, role expansion embeds elevated standards into positions; succession ratchets prevent regression through competitive selection; and domain channeling directs institutional energy toward particular fields. A systematic comparison across Islamic, Chinese, and European cases demonstrates that each component is necessary, but none is sufficient on its own. The Scientific Revolution occurred when all components aligned at Padua-Venice and Oxford-London, where corporate autonomy, competitive appointments, and state patronage converged with investigative practices. The Galileo case provides decisive evidence: his selective activation across domains demonstrates that activation operates as a specific mechanism rather than a stable dispositional trait.

2026-03-02T21:21:13Z Harry Sticker http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01946v3 2026-03-02T09:42:06Z

It is demonstrated that energy conservation allows for a straight derivation of Newtonian mechanics without an apriori definition of the concept of work. Furthermore it is shown that energy must be depicted as a function of position and momentum in order to obtain the correct relativistic equations. Accordingly it is argued that not only quantum theory but also special relativity is intrinsically a Hamiltonian theory which requires a description of the dynamics using coordinate and momentum instead of velocity. Furthermore it is argued that the usual historical order of the ``formulations'' of mechanics, from Newtonian via Lagrangian to Hamiltonian mechanics, is illogical and misleading. We suggest that it should be reversed.

2024-09-03T14:43:42Z C. Baumgarten http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01440v1 2026-03-02T04:40:53Z

This is the first of five papers comprising The Semantic Arrow of Time. The argument begins with a claim: computing's arrow of time is semantic, not thermodynamic. The direction in which meaning is preserved or destroyed across transactions is not a consequence of the second law but of design choices embedded in protocol architectures since Shannon's 1948 channel model. These choices encode the Forward-In-Time-Only (FITO) assumption -- the commitment that causation is irreversible, acyclic, and globally monotonic. We trace this assumption from Eddington's 1927 coinage of "the arrow of time," through the Boltzmann--Loschmidt debate, to contemporary philosophy of physics: Price's time-symmetric ontology, Smolin's temporal naturalism, Rovelli's relational quantum mechanics, and Roberts's analysis of time-reversal symmetry. We show that fundamental physics is time-symmetric at the microscopic level, that the thermodynamic arrow emerges from boundary conditions rather than fundamental law, and that recent demonstrations of indefinite causal order confirm nature admits correlations with no well-defined temporal ordering. We then identify the category mistake (Ryle, 1949): computing inherited Newton's absolute background time -- via Shannon, Lamport, and the impossibility theorems -- and encoded it as a semantic primitive. The FITO assumption is not a law of nature but a design choice, and recognizing this dissolves apparent constraints that have shaped forty years of distributed systems theory. Subsequent papers develop the constructive alternative through link semantics, RDMA, transaction failures, and the Leibniz Bridge framework.

2026-03-02T04:40:53Z 13 pages, 37 references. Part I of V in "The Semantic Arrow of Time" series Paul Borrill http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06927v2 2026-03-01T22:51:52Z

A simplified method to calculate the critical mass of a fissile material sphere is presented. This is a purely pedagogical study, in part to elucidate the historical evolution of criticality calculations. This method employs only elementary calculus and straightforward statistical arguments by formulating the problem in terms of the threshold condition that the number of neutrons in the sphere does not change with time; the average neutron path length in the material must be long enough to produce enough fission neutrons to balance losses by absorption due to nuclear reactions and leakage through the surface. This separates the nuclear reaction part of the problem from the geometry and mechanics of neutron transport, the only connection being the total path length which together with the distance between scatterings determines the sphere radius. This leads to an expression for the critical radius without the need to solve the diffusion equation. Comparison with known critical masses shows agreement at the few-percent level. The analysis can also be applied to impure materials, isotopically or otherwise, and can be extended to general neutronics estimations as a design guide or for order-of-magnitude checking of Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) simulations. A comparison is made with the Oppenheimer-Bethe criticality formula, with the results of other calculations, and with the diffusion equation approach via a new treatment of the boundary conditions.

2025-06-07T21:30:57Z Principle manuscript 8 pages, two figures; supplemental material 6 pages, two figures; added a rate equation solution in Appendix F, corrected typo Steven K. Lamoreaux http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01280v1 2026-03-01T21:34:30Z

A 17th-century oil painting by an unknown artist, once owned by the Tayler family and now in the collection of Trinity College, Cambridge, is currently identified as a portrait of a young Isaac Barrow. The sitter is shown pointing to a proposition in Barrow's 1655 edition of Euclid's Elements, but the portrait bears little resemblance to other depictions of Barrow. Moreover, Barrow is unlikely to have posed with that book, which appeared in print eight months after he had left England on a four-year tour of the Continent. Plausible alternatives are that the portrait is of Francis Willughby or Isaac Newton, both of whom resembled the man pictured and may be characterized as disciples of Barrow. If the Tayler were Newton's portrait, it could shed light on the patronage that allowed him to rise from undergraduate servant ("subsizar") to Lucasian Professor of Mathematics in only five and half years.

2026-03-01T21:34:30Z 18 pages, 12 figures Alejandro Jenkins