https://arxiv.org/api/2hhBTPnSOGY9JMowHCRkSc6dPuk2026-09-11T01:49:48Z572113515http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15995v1Influence of the Electron's Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment on High-Atomic-Number Atoms2026-06-14T19:43:41ZSuper-heavy atoms ($Z > 100$) are usually studied in the context of the so-called ``Quantum Electrodynamics of Strong Fields''. In this theory the problem of the singularity in the electron energy whenever $Z > 137$ is overcome. This is done by considering the finite size of the nucleus and leads to interesting phenomena, such as the spontaneous production of positrons. Here, we show that taking into account the contribution from the Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment of the electron (by means of an effective theory), within a point-nucleus model, is a sufficient condition to obtain regular wave functions and physically acceptable energy values for $Z > 137$.2026-06-14T19:43:41ZOriginally circulated in 1990 as CBPF preprint CBPF-NF-027/90 and never published in a journal; deposited unrevised as a historical record (searchable OCR layer added 2026, page images unaltered). J. Auto-Neto, the corresponding author's M.Sc. advisor, passed away in 2015; deposited in his memory. 13 pages, 2 figuresC. A. S. AlmeidaJ. Auto-Netohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15272v1Symmetry Breaking through Superselection by Boundary Conditions2026-06-13T12:11:23ZSpontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) is central to modern physics but is conventionally defined only for infinite systems, raising challenges for its interpretation in finite, real-world setups. This paper argues that the key to resolving this issue lies in the underappreciated role of boundary conditions in quantum systems. Inspired by both the relational approach to symmetries and the physical mechanism behind symmetry breaking, we formulate a relational interpretation of SSB: a finite system exhibits SSB relative to a reference environment which can induce perturbations across the boundary. This eliminates the need for the thermodynamic limit, offering a more physical picture of SSB that emphasizes the observable consequences of the interactions that real-life systems inevitably have with their environment. We show how, in this relational interpretation, SSB for both lattice systems and (gauge) field theories should be understood as subtle, rather than spontaneous, symmetry breaking, still in contrast to explicit symmetry breaking. We also explain how algebraic definitions of SSB for infinite systems relate to the intuitive picture of SSB in finite systems and illustrate how asymptotic boundary conditions push the environment "to infinity". In this way, our relational interpretation of SSB provides a unified conceptual framework applicable to symmetry-breaking in systems of any size.2026-06-13T12:11:23Z25 pagesSilvester G. A. BorsboomJosé P. Duponthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15224v1General Relativity and Background Independence2026-06-13T09:44:59ZGeneral Relativity (GR) is widely regarded as a paradigmatic example of a background independent theory, a feature often taken to mark a decisive conceptual advance over its Newtonian and special relativistic predecessors. Yet the notion of background independence admits multiple formalizations, and its precise physical and philosophical significance remains contested. This chapter offers a systematic analysis of the strategies that have been proposed to capture background independence in classical spacetime physics. The discussion then turns to a central open question: whether, and in what sense, a successor theory of GR -- such as a theory of quantum gravity -- should be expected to inherit GR's background independence. Drawing on contemporary debates and a range of case studies, the chapter argues that background independence is best understood as a diagnostic and comparative tool rather than as a necessary physical requirement. The resulting perspective highlights both the conceptual virtues and the interpretive costs of eliminating background structures, and helps to explain why background independence remains an open problem in contemporary foundational research.2026-06-13T09:44:59Z30 pages. Forthcoming in S. O. Hansson (ed.), "Comprehensive Philosophy of Science," ElsevierAntonio Vassallo10.1016/B978-0-443-40622-5.00019-0http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15120v1Information Is Not Physical: Possibility Spaces, Erasure, and the Structure of Unrealized Alternatives2026-06-13T05:19:25ZThe slogan ``information is physical,'' introduced by Rolf Landauer and developed through quantum information theory and black-hole thermodynamics, has achieved near-axiomatic status in modern physics. Yet the ontological status of information remains surprisingly underexamined: most discussions either reduce information to a form of energy or treat it as a purely mathematical object. This paper proposes a third position. I argue that information is neither a physical substance nor a free-floating abstraction, but rather \emph{the structure of physically realizable alternatives} -- a counterfactual structure that a physical system instantiates in virtue of the possibility space available to it. Building on Shannon's combinatorial definition, the Landauer principle, the no-cloning theorem, and the black-hole information paradox, I show that the informational content of any physical event is constituted by the set of outcomes that \emph{could have occurred} but did not. This counterfactual reading dissolves several persistent confusions: it explains why erasing information dissipates heat without making information ``material,'' why quantum superposition is informationally richer than any classical mixture, and why information loss in black holes is physically significant beyond mere bookkeeping. The proposal sits within a structural-realist framework but departs from standard structural realism by locating the relevant structure in modal, not merely actual, relations. I conclude by sketching implications for the foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum gravity, and scientific ontology more broadly.2026-06-13T05:19:25ZMadhurendra Mishrahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00805v2A Husserlian ontology of the science of physics2026-06-12T16:37:29ZSince 1939, when Wigner published his proposal to define particles via symmetries expressed as algebraic groups, we have seen a long stream of attempts to formulate an ontology of matter based on mathematics. It has become apparent that such attempts must fail, and more particularly that we cannot derive an ontology of matter from the Standard Model on the basis of quantum field theory. We briefly recapitulate the reasons for this and demonstrate how the philosophy of physics has become scholasticised through a series of vain attempts to obtain a coherent ontology of matter. Here we propose an alternative approach in the form of an ontology of the science of physics. It draws on a framework developed by Husserl which admits not only real material entities but also the idealities which physicists make use of in their thinking. We specify the upper level of this ontology, which addresses the way in which physicists use mathematics when conducting their enquiries. This ontology provides a new perspective concerning the dilemmas of modern physics, including the measurement problem.2026-05-30T16:44:34ZJobst LandgrebeBarry Smithhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14281v1The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly -- Living with Priors in Bayesian confirmation2026-06-12T09:02:03ZBayesian confirmation faces a classic problem: where do initial priors come from? In cases with abundant data and repeated updating, different priors tend to converge to the same posterior. However, in frontier research this convergence often fails, and confirmation remains sensitive to priors. We examine how physics practice in the case of gravitational wave research deals with such cases and, normatively, when prior sensitivity should be regarded as epistemically problematic. We offer a practice-based account of the prior problem, so far absent from the philosophical literature on Bayesianism. One upshot is a clearer diagnosis of so-called 'analogue confirmation'.2026-06-12T09:02:03ZContributed paper to PSA2026: The 30th Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (San Diego, CA; 19-22 Nov 2026)Niels LinnemannChristian Wüthrichhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20520v7Reference Frames and the Ontology of General Relativity. Re(l)ality: The View From Nowhere vs. The View From Everywhere2026-06-12T07:44:12ZIn General Relativity, the genuine observable quantities are gauge-invariant Dirac observables. One well-known method of constructing them is relational, using reference frames. This leaves open an interpretive question: how should we understand two distinct relational observables defined relative to two distinct frames? I argue that this question admits two equally precise answers, corresponding to two distinct ontologies for relational general-relativistic physics, both expressible within a single fibre-bundle vocabulary. Central to the analysis is a distinction -- building on Wallace (2019) -- between frame-independence and frame-freedom, which disambiguates appeals to perspective-'neutrality'. The View from Nowhere treats relational observables as gauge-invariant partial descriptions on one underlying physical situation, typically formalised as a frame-free gauge equivalence class, and articulates within GR Adlam (2024)'s moderate physical perspectivalism. The View from Everywhere takes each relational description to represent the 'most comprehensive' -- as opposed to partial -- physical situation, rejecting ontological commitment to any shared frame-free reality, and articulates Adlam's strong perspectivalism in a non-solipsistic form. I do not settle the choice between them: each is reconstructed with its ontological commitments and costs made explicit. The framework also exhibits a constructive counter-example to a leading objection to strong perspectivalism -- that it cannot underwrite the structural connections between perspectives without frame-free structures -- by showing that a frame-independent inter-frame translation map fulfils the intended connective function. I conclude by suggesting how the results of this works may also shed light on parallel debates in quantum reference frames and relational quantum mechanics.2024-12-29T16:57:57ZNicola Bamontihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.14043v1A Unified Subject Map for 130 Years of Physics2026-06-12T02:37:28ZMore than a century of physics is recorded in the American Physical Society (APS) archive, but the corpus cannot be analyzed as a single, time-resolved object because its subject metadata are fragmented across eras with no shared vocabulary. We close this gap by using a frontier large language model to retrospectively assign the modern Physics Subject Headings (PhySH) to the historical archive, yielding a unified subject map for every APS paper from 1893 to 2025. The resulting map not only reproduces century-scale disciplinary arcs but also resolves the fine-grained lifecycles of individual ideas, materials, techniques, and discoveries across a vocabulary of over 3,000 PhySH Concepts. The map turns a fragmented archive into a quantitative substrate for systematic search and for data-driven studies of how physics evolves.2026-06-12T02:37:28ZKhoa NguyenPragyan PandeySophie LiEric Y. Mahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2412.11532v2Relativistic Locality from Electromagnetism to Quantum Field Theory2026-06-11T17:05:39ZElectromagnetism is the paradigm case of a theory that satisfies relativistic locality. This can be proven by demonstrating that, once the theory's laws are imposed, what is happening within a region fixes what will happen in the contracting light-cone with that region as its base. The Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations meet the same standard. We show that this standard can also be applied to quantum field theory (without collapse), examining two different ways of assigning reduced density matrix states to regions of space. Our preferred method begins from field wave functionals and judges quantum field theory to be local. Another method begins from particle wave functions (states in Fock space) and leads to either non-locality or an inability to assign states to regions, depending on the choice of creation operators. We take this analysis of quantum field theory (without collapse) to show that the many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics is local at the fundamental level. We argue that this fundamental locality is compatible with either local or global accounts of the non-fundamental branching of worlds, countering an objection that has been raised to the Sebens-Carroll derivation of the Born Rule from self-locating uncertainty.2024-12-16T08:09:56ZJune 12, 2026 preprint. Forthcoming in Local Quantum Mechanics: Everett, Many Worlds, and Reality (ed. Alyssa Ney), New York: Oxford University Press (2026)Eugene Y. S. ChuaCharles T. Sebenshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13522v1Beyond the Metric: Geometrical Measurability as a Constraint on Quantum Gravity2026-06-11T16:12:13ZThis paper develops an epistemological constraint on quantum gravity grounded in the empirical meaning of general relativity. The central claim is that a complete recovery of general relativity requires an effective metric, a continuum limit, or Einstein-like dynamics together with the physical conditions under which relational geometrical quantities can be objectively determined. These conditions concern the dynamical stability of measuring devices and reference systems, causal accessibility among physical systems, record formation, and invariance under admissible descriptions. In classical general relativity, they are usually implicit in the use of clocks, rods, light signals, freely falling bodies, detectors, and gauge-invariant observables. In quantum gravity, however, they become non-trivial because spacetime geometry may be emergent, effective, thermodynamic, relational, or frame-dependent. This claim is developed through four cases: Rindler horizons and the Unruh effect, black-hole thermodynamics and Jacobson's equation-of-state derivation, gravitational-wave detection, and Weyl and conformal gravity. The latter is discussed as a critical limiting case in which conformal invariance raises a sharp question about whether scale-dependent measurements of space and time can be physically fixed. Implications for quantum gravity are also discussed using emergent gravity and quantum reference frames as examples. The perspective developed in the study suggests a general epistemological constraint on quantum gravity: any viable approach must recover the physical possibility of objective geometrical measurement together with geometry itself.2026-06-11T16:12:13Z24 pages including references, 1 table. Comments are welcomeMatteo Tuverihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09818v2An Introduction to the Foundations and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics2026-06-10T08:33:38ZThis article surveys a selection of key conceptual and interpretational developments in quantum mechanics, tracing the theory from its foundational postulates to contemporary discussions of measurement, nonlocality, and the emergence of classicality. Beginning with the structure of Hilbert space and the postulates governing state evolution and measurement, the epistemic stance of the Copenhagen interpretation and its modern reformulations are examined. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, Bell's theorem, and Hardy's paradox are then discussed as probes of locality and realism, alongside the deterministic but explicitly nonlocal de Broglie-Bohm theory. The measurement problem and the implications of contextuality are analyzed in relation to objective collapse models, which introduce new physical dynamics to account for definite outcomes. Finally, the role of decoherence in the suppression of interference and the emergence of classical behavior is explored, together with the interpretational frameworks of many-worlds and consistent histories. This material aims to provide a coherent introductory overview of how several of the most prominent interpretations address the central concern of what quantum mechanics tells us about the nature of physical reality.2026-03-10T15:44:47Z15 pages, 3 figures. Invited submission to Lectures from the 33rd Chris Engelbrecht Summer School, Stellenbosch 2025Theodore McKeeverAhsan Nazirhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11102v1The Ohio SETI Program -- The Last Decades2026-06-09T17:01:55ZThe Ohio State University Radio Observatory (OSURO), known as the Big Ear, played a pivotal role in both radio astronomy and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). Following the completion of the Ohio Sky Survey, the facility was repurposed in 1973 as the world's first full-time dedicated SETI observatory and operated continuously until its decommissioning in 1998. During this period, the Ohio SETI Program evolved from an 8-channel hydrogen-line receiver into increasingly sophisticated survey systems. Over three decades, these surveys covered approximately 70% of the radio sky using a largely consistent instrumental configuration, creating one of the most extensive long-term radio astronomy archives ever assembled. The program is best known for the detection of the Wow! Signal in 1977, but it also accumulated an archive of over 40,000 transient narrowband events, revealed unusual concentrations of radio bursts near the Galactic Center, and established one of the longest continuous radio monitoring records in astronomy. Following the closure of the Big Ear, its scientific legacy continued through Project Argus and, more recently, the Arecibo Wow! project. This paper provides an overview of the final decades of the Ohio SETI Program, including its instrumentation, survey strategies, scientific discoveries, and enduring impact on SETI, time-domain radio astronomy, and the preservation of historical astronomical data. Despite its scientific significance, most of the data collected by the Ohio SETI Program remains unexplored, leaving a unique archive available for future research.2026-06-09T17:01:55Z9 pages. Submitted to Advancing the Search for Technosignatures, Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 404Abel MéndezRobert S. DixonRussell K. Childershttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10433v1At the Origins of Electroculture: A Retrodictive Modelling of Bertholon's 18th-Century Electrovegetometer in the Pre-Corona Regime2026-06-09T05:19:03ZPierre-Nicolas Bertholon's 18th-century electrovegetometer was conceived to harness "atmospheric electricity" for plant growth, yet its physical capabilities have never been quantified within the context of today's understanding of the Earth's atmospheric electric system. This study addresses the lack of quantitative assessment of such historical "electroculture" device and its plausible influence on the near-canopy electrical environment. It aims to reinterpret Bertholon's apparatus using contemporary atmospheric electrodynamics, asking under which realistic fair-weather and storm-like conditions a purely passive collector-distributor could generate fields and ion fluxes of physical significance. A two-dimensional, quasi-steady ohmic model has been developed in which the atmosphere is a resistive column carrying the global conduction current, the metal structure is a floating conductor supported by leaky wooden insulators and space-charge and corona are excluded so that all results describe pre-onset upper bounds. The simulations show that in fair weather the single upper point and the lower multi-point crown of the electrovegetometer enhance the background field by two to three orders of magnitude, yet only within millimetric-centimetric regions around the tips and with total currents limited to the pA-nA/m^2 range. Under storm-like forcing, peak fields at the crown reach 100-1000 kV/m, approaching or exceeding empirical corona-onset thresholds, while remaining largely insensitive to uncertainties in apex angle or collector geometry as long as an elevated mast is present. These results make Bertholon's reports of luminous "aigrettes" physically plausible, but suggest that any fair-weather agronomic impact was subtle and highly localized and that modern "electroculture" claims require careful, coupled electrostatic and biological studies beyond the pre-corona regime.2026-06-09T05:19:03ZCompte-Rendus Mécanique de l'Académie des Sciences. Volume 354 (2026), p. 117-139Thierry Dufour10.5802/crmeca.346http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10429v1From Electroculture to Plasma Agriculture: A Three-Century Arc Bridging Bertholon's Legacy with Contemporary Farming Advances2026-06-09T05:10:20ZThis review traces the historical trajectory of electricity in agriculture, from the earliest observations of electrical phenomena to the emergence of cold plasmas. Looking back to Antiquity and then to the Enlightenment, it underlines Abbé Bertholon's 18th-century efforts to channel atmospheric electricity to stimulate crops, using devices such as the electro-végétomètre. Although these early electroculture experiments relied on neither quantitative dosimetry nor rigorous methodology, they foreshadowed the idea of a controlled transfer of electrical energy to plants. Then the review examines the historical development of galvanism, electrochemistry, and the physics of gaseous discharges throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, which collectively laid the foundations for contemporary cold-plasma technologies. In the 21st century, plasma agriculture has emerged as an interdisciplinary approach integrating electrical, chemical, radiative, thermal, and fluid-mechanical effects. Applications include seed treatment (preconditioning, seed priming), stimulation of plant growth, soil and water treatment, and decontamination of agri-food products. The review thus reassesses Abbé Bertholon's contributions as those of a methodological precursor and shows how his intuition of a "vivifying electricity" resonates with modern cold-plasma science. Finally, it argues that plasma agriculture can transform an Enlightenment intuition into a reproducible experimental framework for sustainable agriculture and food safety.2026-06-09T05:10:20ZCompte-Rendus Mecanique de l'Academie des Sciences, Volume 354 (2026), pp. 89-116Thierry Dufour10.5802/crmeca.331http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18180v3Comment on "Specific heat of an ideal Bose gas above the Bose condensation temperature," [Am. J. Phys. 72(9), 1193--1194 (2004)]2026-06-08T11:36:16ZWe examine the English translation of Albert Einstein's groundbreaking 1925 paper on Bose-Einstein condensation. We guide readers to execute the calculations Einstein outlined for the specific heat above the condensation temperature, correct some numerical errors, and compare his formula with a different one published in the American Journal of Physics in 2004. The history of the acceptance of Einstein's theory will be summarized.2026-04-20T12:36:22ZSubmitted to the American Journal of Physics on April 20, 2026. Comment on https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1764562. Link to digital scans of Einstein's handwritten manuscript addedFrank Wang