https://arxiv.org/api/2hhBTPnSOGY9JMowHCRkSc6dPuk 2026-06-13T16:44:08Z 5610 135 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23491v1 2026-02-26T20:53:16Z

The probabilistic description of the time evolution of a physical system can take two conceptually distinct forms: a trajectory of probabilities, which specifies how probabilities evolve over time, and a probability on trajectories, which assigns probabilities to possible histories. A lack of a clear distinction between these two probabilistic descriptions has given rise to a number of conceptual difficulties, particularly in recent analyses of stochastic-quantum correspondence. This paper provides a systematic account of their relationship. We define probability dynamics and stochastic process families together with a precise notion of implementation that connects the two descriptions. We show that implementations are generically non-unique, that every probability dynamics admits a Markovian implementation, and characterize when non-Markovian implementations are possible. We expose fallacies in common arguments for the linearity of probability dynamics based on the law of total probability and clarify the proper interpretation of ``transition matrices'' by distinguishing dynamics-level maps from the conditional probability matrices of implementing processes. We further introduce decomposability as the appropriate general notion of stepwise evolution for (possibly nonlinear) probability dynamics, relate it to divisibility in the linear case -- showing that the two can come apart -- and disentangle both notions from Markovianity and time-homogeneity. Finally, we connect these results to what we call statistical dynamics, in which linearity is indeed physically motivated, and contrast the framework with quantum mechanics.

2026-02-26T20:53:16Z Győző Egri Marton Gomori Balazs Gyenis Gábor Hofer-Szabó http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22792v1 2026-02-26T09:29:00Z

Bohr's principle of complementarity, prohibiting simultaneous access to certain physical properties within a single experimental arrangement, is considered to be a defining feature of quantum mechanics. It is commonly viewed as inducing an intrinsic hierarchy among incompatible observables: some sets of quantum properties are fundamentally more incompatible than others, as quantified by the maximal sharpness permitting their joint measurement. We show that this hierarchy ceases to be absolute in the multi-copy regime. Analyzing qubit spin observables, we prove a No-Comparison Theorem establishing that no global ordering of incompatible observable sets is preserved across all finite-copy configurations. In particular, two sets of observables can exhibit reversed complementarity ordering depending solely on whether the available resources are arranged as identical copies or as parallel-antiparallel pairs. Thus, the degree of quantum incompatibility is not an intrinsic property of observables alone but depends on the global configuration of the prepared quantum probes. Our results uncover a configuration-dependent structure of complementarity, reveal a subtle role of entanglement in shaping the structure of measurement limitations, and call for a reassessment of quantum information protocols under finite resources.

2026-02-26T09:29:00Z 4.25 pages (double column) + 6 pages (single column), 4 figures; Comments are welcome Kunika Agarwal Sahil Gopalkrishna Naik Ananya Chakraborty Guruprasad Kar Ram Krishna Patra Snehasish Roy Chowdhury Manik Banik http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20331v1 2026-02-23T20:26:47Z

Hilbert space fundamentalism (HSF) states that everything about the physical world is encoded in the Hamiltonian operator and the state vector (as a unit vector, not a wavefunction, which requires additional specification of a configuration space, a position basis, or the position observables). That all structures needed to describe reality, including subsystems, space, fields, emerge from these. I show that HSF can't account for our observations that the physical world changes in time.

2026-02-23T20:26:47Z 3 pages Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19365v1 2026-02-22T22:20:51Z

In the nineteenth century, the Dutch established time signals in their Atlantic colonies to synchronise maritime navigation with European standards. In Paramaribo (Suriname), a sophisticated sequence of apparatus -- including time balls, noon guns, discs and flags -- operated from 1851 until World War I. Naval officers aboard guard ships used sextants equipped with artificial horizons to determine local noon, thus integrating the colony into the global Greenwich-based cartographic system. This infrastructure was not merely technical; it became a civic ritual, with the daily noon gun structuring urban life and becoming a point of political negotiation between naval commanders and the colonial governor. In contrast, the Dutch Caribbean islands employed simpler, pragmatic systems. Curaçao used a daily time flag, a cost-effective solution suited to its climate and harbour scale, while smaller islands like Aruba and St. Eustatius relied on occasional noon guns. This diversity reflected a decentralised colonial administration that adapted technologies to local conditions and budgets. The history of these time signals reveals a process of hybrid adaptation, not simply replication of European models. They were shaped by environmental challenges, fiscal constraints and local politics, functioning simultaneously as navigational aids and civic landmarks. Their eventual decline, owing to budgetary pressures and new technologies like wireless telegraphy, underscores the fragile and negotiated nature of colonial scientific infrastructures.

2026-02-22T22:20:51Z 14 pages, incl. 5 figures. Accepted for publication in the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (December 2026) Richard de Grijs Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19364v1 2026-02-22T22:15:46Z

In the nineteenth century, the Netherlands quickly adopted the time ball -- a British innovation for maritime chronometer calibration -- in its main naval ports (Nieuwediep/Den Helder, Vlissingen, Hellevoetsluis) and commercial centres (Amsterdam, Rotterdam). A large sphere dropped from a mast at a fixed time, the device enabled ships to verify their chronometers against a standard, essential for accurate longitude determination and safe navigation. Its ready acceptance was eased by indigenous Dutch traditions. Rural communities had long used visual time signals like the sjouw on Terschelling island, a wicker ball raised on a mast to mark the lunch hour and milking time for farmers, and the lawei, a basket or sack used in the peat bogs of Friesland to regulate labourers' hours. The Dutch time-signal system was distinguished by its strong institutional backing from the country's Royal Navy, its Hydrographic Service and by professional astronomers. Among the latter, Frederik Kaiser was a pivotal figure, vehemently defending the system's accuracy and pioneering technical improvements. He successfully advocated for replacing the traditional falling ball with a system of rotating flaps, which provided a more instantaneous and reliable visual signal. Beyond their practical role, time signals became civic spectacles and symbols of Dutch scientific modernity and imperial reach. Their decline began with the electric telegraph and was finalised by wireless radio, which allowed ships to calibrate chronometers at sea.

2026-02-22T22:15:46Z 24 pages, incl. 15 figures. Accepted for publication in the Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (December 2026) Richard de Grijs Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18641v1 2026-02-20T22:30:56Z

In April 2024, the White House directed NASA to establish Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC) by December 2026. The programme assumes that a unified time standard can be constructed by deploying atomic clocks on the lunar surface, computing relativistic corrections, and distributing synchronized time via LunaNet. This paper argues that the entire enterprise rests on a category mistake in the sense introduced by Ryle and developed by Spekkens in quantum foundations: it treats "synchronized time" as an ontic entity -- something that exists independently and can be transmitted from authoritative sources to dependent receivers -- when it is in fact an epistemic construct: a model-dependent representation of observer-relative clock relationships. We analyze the cislunar time programme through the lens of Forward-In-Time-Only (FITO) assumptions, Spekkens' Leibnizian operationalism, the Wood-Spekkens fine-tuning argument, and the distinction between ontic and epistemic interpretations that has dissolved long-standing puzzles in quantum mechanics. We show that the same conceptual move that dissolves quantum "mysteries" -- recognizing what is epistemic versus what is ontic -- dissolves the apparent coherence of the cislunar time programme and reveals it as an engineering project built on a philosophical confusion. We sketch a transactional alternative grounded in bilateral atomic interactions rather than unidirectional time distribution.

2026-02-20T22:30:56Z 13 pages, no figures Paul Borrill http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18334v1 2026-02-20T16:39:35Z

C.V. Raman (1888-1970) was one of the pioneering scientists to have emerged from India during the colonial era. His scientific explorations were driven by his curiosity to understand wave phenomena. Naturally, optics and related physical effects were at the heart of such an exploration. Apart from his Nobel prize-winning discovery of the Raman effect, his research included topics such as oblique diffraction, light scattering from liquids and amorphous solids, classical and quantum nature of light, acousto-optics, haloes and coronae (speckles), crystal dynamics and soft modes, optics of minerals, floral colors, physiology of vision and many other aspects related to light in natural settings. In this article, I give a historical overview of some of the work by C.V. Raman and his group that had a direct connection to optics and optical spectroscopy.

2026-02-20T16:39:35Z Invited review. Submitted to Journal of Optical Society of America B - Special issue on "Optics in South Asia" G. V. Pavan Kumar http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01617v2 2026-02-20T14:01:48Z

Although several accounts of scientific understanding exist, the concept of understanding in relation to technology remains underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by proposing a philosophical account of technological understanding: the type of understanding that is required for and reflected by successfully designing and using technological artefacts. We develop this notion by building on the concept of scientific understanding. Drawing on parallels between science and technology, and specifically between scientific theories and technological artefacts, we extend the idea of scientific understanding into the realm of technology. We argue that, just as scientific understanding involves the ability to explain a phenomenon using a theory, technological understanding involves the ability to use a technological artefact to realise a practical aim. Both theories and artefacts are tools, and using them successfully requires the cognitive skill of understanding. Technological understanding is thus conceived as the ability to recognise how a practical aim can be achieved by using a technological artefact. In a context of design, this general notion of technological understanding is specified as the ability to design an artefact that, by producing a phenomenon through its physical structure, achieves the intended aim. By analogy with De Regt's criterion of the intelligibility of theories, we give, as a precondition for technological understanding, a criterion for the intelligibility of a technological artefact. We illustrate our concept of technological understanding through two running examples: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and superconducting quantum computers. Our account highlights the epistemic dimension of engaging with technology and, by allowing for context-dependent specifications, provides guidance for testing and improving technological understanding in specific contexts.

2025-03-03T14:51:02Z Eline de Jong Sebastian De Haro http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16480v5 2026-02-19T17:34:13Z

For the simple system of a point-like particle confined to a straight line, I compile, initially in a concise table, the structural elements of quantum mechanics and contrast them with those of classical (statistical) mechanics. Despite many similarities, there are the well-known fundamental differences, resulting from the algebraic non-commutativity in the quantal structure. The latter was discovered by Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976) in June 1925 on the small island of Helgoland in the North Sea, as a consequence of understanding atomic spectral data within a matrix scheme consistent with energy conservation. I discuss the differences and exemplify their quantifications by the variance and entropic indeterminacy inequalities, by (pseudo-)classical bounds on quantum canonical partition functions, and by the correlation inequalities of John Bell (1928-1990) and others.

2025-06-19T17:25:40Z Differences from version v4: typos corrected, minor stylistic improvements, and three further references. To appear as a chapter of the book "Quantum Mechanics: A Century Later", ed. by Tuck C. Choy, World Scientific, Singapore 2026 Hajo Leschke http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13520v3 2026-02-19T11:43:12Z

J. B. Fourier in his \emph{Théorie Analytique de la Chaleur} of 1822 introduced, amongst other things, two ideas that have made a fundamental impact in fields as diverse as Mathematical Physics, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Music. The first one of these, a method to find the coefficients for a trigonometric series describing an arbitrary function, was very early on picked up by G. Ohm and H. Helmholtz as the foundation for a theory of \emph{musical tones}. The second one, which is described by Fourier's double integral, became the basis for treating certain kinds of infinity in discontinuous functions, as shown by A. De Morgan in his 1842 \emph{The Differential and Integral Calculus}. Both make up the fundamental basis for what is now commonly known as the \emph{Fourier theorem}. With the help of P. A. M. Dirac's insights into the nature of these infinities, we can have a compact description of the frequency spectrum of a function of time, or conversely of a waveform corresponding to a given function of frequency. This paper, using solely primary sources, takes us from the physics of heat propagation to the modern theory of musical signals. It concludes with some considerations on the inherent duality of time and frequency emerging from Fourier's theorem.

2026-02-13T23:18:28Z Victor Lazzarini http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16985v1 2026-02-19T01:06:54Z

In his late piece 'La nouvelle cuisine' (Bell 1990), John Bell describes the steps from an intuitive, informal principle of locality to a mathematical rule called Factorizability. This rule stipulates that when possible past causes are held fixed, the joint probabilities of outcomes of spacelike separated measurements, conditional on measurement settings, be the product of the local conditional probabilities individually. Bell shows that Factorizability conflicts with predictions of QM, predictions since confirmed in many experiments. However, Bell warns his readers that the steps leading to Factorizability should 'be viewed with the utmost suspicion'. He says that 'it is precisely in cleaning up intuitive ideas for mathematics that one is likely to throw the baby out with the bathwater' (1990, 239). Bell's suspicions were well-founded, for he himself misses an important baby. Here we retrieve and identify it: it is selection bias. We explain how failure of Factorizability may be regarded as a selection artefact, requiring no violation of locality in the intuitive, conceptual sense with which Bell begins his analysis. The argument begins with a central principle of causal discovery, Reichenbach's Principle of Common Cause (PCC). It is well known that correlations due to selection bias are not subject to PCC. Several writers have proposed that EPR-Bell correlations are also an exception to PCC, but it has not been noticed that they fall under this well-known exclusion. The point is relevant not only to the status of Bell nonlocality, but also for statistics and causal modeling. For these fields, the news is that selection effects play a ubiquitous role in quantum phenomena, in a form akin to collider bias.

2026-02-19T01:06:54Z 21 pages, 3 figures Huw Price http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16495v1 2026-02-18T14:38:31Z

We critically examine proposals for the so-called warp-drive spacetimes and classify these models based on their various restrictions within the framework of General Relativity. We then provide a summary of general formalism for each class, and in the process, we highlight some misconceptions, misunderstandings, and errors in the literature that have been used to support claims about the physicality and feasibility of these models. On the way, we prove several new no-go theorems. Our analysis shows that when the principles of General Relativity are applied correctly, most claims regarding physical warp drives must be reassessed, and it becomes highly challenging to justify or support the viability of such models, not merely due to the violation of energy conditions.

2026-02-18T14:38:31Z 33 pages, 1 figure, REVTeX4-2 Hamed Barzegar Thomas Buchert Quentin Vigneron http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14601v1 2026-02-16T10:02:28Z

We explain the achievements that were awarded 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics, as well as the preceding and the later developments. The main notions and historic cornerstones of Bell inequalities, the related researches on quantum entanglement are reviewed, and the key physical ideas are emphasized. Among the early work, C. S. Wu's contributions using polarization-entangled photons from electron-positron annihilation are introduced.

2026-02-16T10:02:28Z 22 pages. This review article is the English version of a Chinese article published in Chinese Journal of Nature 44(6), 455-466 (2022) [ DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9608.2022.06.005], which was based on a talk the author gave at 2022 Fall Meeting of Chinese Physical Society (the video is available at https://www.koushare.com/video/details/173010) Yu Shi http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14059v1 2026-02-15T09:09:45Z

I discuss the physical basis of classical mechanics, such as expressed commonly using the framework of Newton's Principia. Newton's formulation of the laws of motion is seen to have quite a few ambiguities and shortcomings. Therefore I offer an alternative set of laws, based in particular on ideas of his contemporaries Huygens and Leibniz with a crucial addition by Ludwig Lange, which avoids the problems with Newton's formulation. It is shown that from these laws of motion all the usual results of classical mechanics, as it concerns the motion of idealized point masses, can be rederived. The application of these principles to relativistic point particles is discussed.

2026-02-15T09:09:45Z 16 pages excluding references, 1 figure J. W. van Holten http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13708v1 2026-02-14T10:21:05Z

Symmetry is often treated in philosophy of physics as an interpretive problem. A particularly lively dispute concerns local symmetries: do they indicate surplus structure that ought to be expunged, or are they merely a harmless redundancy? One influential response favours the second option for certain theories -- those dubbed internally sophisticated. And indeed, in much of physics practice, local symmetries are left implicit: one simply works "up to isomorphism'' without pausing over invariance. But not always. In some settings, local symmetry and invariance become pressing practical concerns for physicists. Yet philosophical discussions of sophistication have paid little sustained attention to when, and why, this happens. Surveying textbook general relativity (GR) and gauge theory, I identify the settings in which diffeomorphism invariance or gauge invariance must be handled explicitly. (Here a setting is a choice of representational framework or background assumptions within which one formulates and uses the theory -- for instance, linearisation, an initial-value formulation, or a Hamiltonian $3+1$ formalism.) I propose an operational criterion -- background-relative sophistication (BRS) -- and argue that it accounts well for the pattern: it marks just where symmetry can stay implicit and where it must be made explicit. Quantum and subsystem settings raise a further difficulty: there, certain tasks (superposition and gluing) force symmetry into view even for theories that are BRS.

2026-02-14T10:21:05Z 31 pages, 5 figures Henrique Gomes