https://arxiv.org/api/09VMBkz6ErmtlDElx2Ovg14fsnQ 2026-06-23T23:03:16Z 5624 1230 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01463v2 2023-03-26T13:49:26Z

Following an article by John von Neumann on infinite tensor products, we develop the idea that the usual formalism of quantum mechanics, associated with unitary equivalence of representations, stops working when countable infinities of particles (or degrees of freedom) are encountered. This is because the dimension of the corresponding Hilbert space becomes uncountably infinite, leading to the loss of unitary equivalence, and to sectorization. By interpreting physically this mathematical fact, we show that it provides a natural way to describe the "Heisenberg cut", as well as a unified mathematical model including both quantum and classical physics, appearing as required incommensurable facets in the description of nature.

2022-09-03T16:51:19Z 13 pages, no figure. In v2 some clarifications added Foundations of Physics 53:45 (2023) Mathias Van Den Bossche Philippe Grangier 10.1007/s10701-023-00678-x http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14306v1 2023-03-25T00:15:53Z

Quantum Mechanics (QM) stands alone as a (very) successful physical theory, but the meaning of its variables and the status of many quantities in the mathematical formalism is obscure. This unique situation prompted the need for attribution of a physical meaning to the latter, a procedure known as interpretation. On the other hand, the study of QM is usually presented, even to future scientists, within the only framework developed by Bohr and the Copenhagen researchers, known as the Copenhagen interpretation. As a contribution to the understanding and teaching of Quantum Mechanics, aimed to a broader and deeper appreciation of its fundamentals, including contemplating alternatives and updated interpretations for physicists and philosophers interested in the study of exact sciences (through Ontology, Epistemology, Logic or the Theory of Knowledge), we present a set of Conceptual Diagrams elaborated and designed to expose and facilitate the visualization of elements intervening in any interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and apply them to several well-developed cases of the latter.

2023-03-25T00:15:53Z Published by Astronomische Nachrichten as a contribution to the IWARA Workshop 2022: Reviews Jorge E. Horvath Rodrigo Rosas Fernandes http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14064v1 2023-03-24T15:20:12Z

We give a conceptual exposition of aspects of gravitational radiation, especially in relation to energy. Our motive for doing so is that the strong analogies with electromagnetic radiation seem not to be widely enough appreciated. In particular, we reply to some recent papers in the philosophy of physics literature that seem to deny that gravitational waves carry energy. Our argument is based on two points: (i) that for both electromagnetism and gravity, in the presence of material sources, radiation is an effective concept, unambiguously emerging only in certain regimes or solutions of the theory; and (ii) similarly, energy conservation is only unambiguous in certain regimes or solutions of general relativity. Crucially, the domain of (i), in which radiation is meaningful, has a significant overlap with the domain of (ii), in which energy conservation is meaningful. Conceptually, the overlap of regimes is no coincidence: the long-standing question about the existence of gravitational waves was settled precisely by finding a consistent way to articulate their energy and momentum.

2023-03-24T15:20:12Z 16 pages, 6 page appendix Henrique Gomes Carlo Rovelli http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14060v1 2023-03-24T15:10:18Z

In this two-part paper we review, and then develop, the assessment of the hole argument for general relativity. The review (in Part I) discussed how to compare points in isomorphic spacetimes, i.e. models of the theory. This second Part proposes a framework for making comparisons of {\em non}-isomorphic spacetimes. It combines two ideas we discussed in Part I -- the philosophical idea of counterparts, and the idea of threading points between spacetimes other than by isomorphism -- with the mathematics of fibre bundles. We first recall the ideas from Part I (Section 1). Then in Section 2 and an Appendix, we define a fibre bundle whose fibres are isomorphic copies of a given spacetime or model, and discuss connections on this fibre bundle. This material proceeds on analogy with field-space formulations of gauge theories. Finally, in Section 3, we show how this fibre bundle gives natural expressions of the philosophical ideas of counterparts, and of threading.

2023-03-24T15:10:18Z 22 pages, 8 page appendix Henrique Gomes Jeremy Butterfield http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14052v1 2023-03-24T15:05:16Z

In this two-part paper, we review, and then develop, the assessment of the hole argument for general relativity. This first Part reviews the literature hitherto, focussing on the philosophical aspects. It also introduces two main ideas we will need in Part II: which will propose a framework for making comparisons of non-isomorphic spacetimes. In Section 1 of this paper, we recall Einstein's original argument. Section 2 recalls the argument's revival by philosophers in the 1980s and 1990s. This includes the first main idea we will need in Part II: namely, that two spacetime points in different possible situations are never strictly identical -- they are merely counterparts. In Section 3, we report -- and rebut -- more recent claims to "dissolve" the argument. Our rebuttal is based on the fact that in differential geometry, and its applications in physics such as general relativity, points are in some cases identified, or correspond with each other, between one context and another, by means other than isometry (or isomorphism). We call such a correspondence a threading of points. This is the second main idea we shall use in Part II.

2023-03-24T15:05:16Z 31 pages Henrique Gomes Jeremy Butterfield http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.13615v1 2023-03-23T18:59:28Z

How do we characterize the shape of a surface? It is now well understood that the shape of a surface is determined by measuring how curved it is at each point. From these measurements, one can identify the directions of largest and smallest curvature, i.e. the principal curvatures, and construct two surface invariants by taking the average and the product of the principal curvatures. The product of the principal curvatures describes the intrinsic curvature of a surface, and has profound importance in differential geometry - evidenced by the Gauss's Theorema Egregium and the Gauss-Bonnet theorem. This curvature is commonly referred to as the Gaussian Curvature after Carl Friedrich Gauss, following his significant contributions to the emerging field of differential geometry in his 1828 work. The average, or mean curvature, is an extrinsic measure of the shape of a surface - that is, the shape must be embedded in a higher dimensional space to be measured. Beginning in 1811, and culminating in efforts in 1821 and 1826, the mathematician Sophie Germain identified the mean curvature as the appropriate measure for describing the shape of vibrating plates. Her hypothesis leads directly to the equations describing the behavior of thin, elastic plates. In letters to Gauss, she described her notion of a "sphere of mean curvature" that can be identified at each point on the surface. This contribution stimulated a period of rapid development in elasticity and geometry, and yet Germain has not yet received due credit for deducing the mathematical and physical significance of mean curvature. It is clear from the primary source evidence that this measure of mean curvature should bear the name of Sophie Germain.

2023-03-23T18:59:28Z 6 pages, 3 figures Douglas P. Holmes http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01560v1 2023-03-23T16:59:07Z

The view of nature we adopt in the natural attitude is determined by common sense, without which we could not survive. Classical physics is modelled on this common-sense view of nature, and uses mathematics to formalise our natural understanding of the causes and effects we observe in time and space when we select subsystems of nature for modelling. But in modern physics, we do not go beyond the realm of common sense by augmenting our knowledge of what is going on in nature. Rather, we have measurements that we do not understand, so we know nothing about the ontology of what we measure. We help ourselves by using entities from mathematics, which we fully understand ontologically. But we have no ontology of the reality of modern physics; we have only what we can assert mathematically. In this paper, we describe the ontology of classical and modern physics against this background and show how it relates to the ontology of common sense and of mathematics.

2023-03-23T16:59:07Z Jobst Landgrebe Barry Smith http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05133v2 2023-03-23T09:49:51Z

A brief history of the development of surface detectors for the study of the high-energy cosmic rays is presented. The paper is based on an invited talk given at UHECR2022 held in LAquila, October 2022. In a complementary talk, P Sokolsky discussed the development of the fluorescence technique for air-shower detection.

2023-03-09T09:34:59Z 11 pages, 2 diagrams. Based on talked presented at UHECR2022 in L'Aquila Minor revisions (typos etc.) after referee's report A. A. Watson 10.1051/epjconf/202328301002 http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12945v1 2023-03-22T23:03:33Z

Isaac Newton, in popular imagination the Ur-scientist, was an outstanding humanist scholar. His researches on, among others, ancient philosophy, are thorough and appear to be connected to and fit within his larger philosophical and theological agenda. It is therefore relevant to take a closer look at Newton's intellectual choices, at how and why precisely he would occupy himself with specific text-sources, and how this interest fits into the larger picture of his scientific and intellectual endeavours. In what follows, we shall follow Newton into his study and look over his shoulder while reading compendia and original source-texts in his personal library at Cambridge, meticulously investigating and comparing fragments and commentaries, and carefully keeping track in private notes of how they support his own developing ideas. Indeed, Newton was convinced that precursors to his own insights and discoveries were present already in Antiquity, even before the Greeks, in ancient Egypt, and he puts a lot of time and effort into making the point, especially, and not incidentially, in the period between the first and the second edition of the Principia. A clear understanding of his reading of the classic sources therefore matters to our understanding of its content and gestation process. In what follows we will confine ourselves to the classical legacy, and investigate Newton's intellectual intercourse with it.

2023-03-22T23:03:33Z 57 pages, 6 pictures, 1 appendix. Content presented at the Symposium "Isaac Newton's General Scholium: science, religion, metaphysics", at King's College, Halifax, Canada, on 2013 Karin Verelst http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17011v1 2023-03-22T08:19:44Z

Foreward to the Bolyai-Gauss-Lobachevsky 2022 special issue, published in ${\it Symmetry}$, in lieu of the 12${}^{\rm th}$ International Conference on Non-Euclidean Geometry, ``BGL-2022''.

2023-03-22T08:19:44Z 8 pages, 3 figures. Matches version published in the BGL-2022 special issue: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/symmetry/special_issues/BGL_2022 Symmetry 2023, 15(3), 707 (2023) László Jenkovszky Matthew J. Lake Vladimir Soloviev 10.3390/sym15030707 http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09413v1 2023-03-16T15:45:33Z

This essay explores the relations between aesthetics and motivation, primarily in quantum physics, focusing on the notions of play, beauty, and the joy of insight. The motivating role of these notions is examined both historically among the quantum pioneers and contemporarily, based on a series of interviews, among physicists associated with the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen.

2023-03-16T15:45:33Z Annalen der Physik, 2022, 534 (9), pp. 2200283 (1-6) Henrik Zinkernagel 10.1002/andp.202200283 http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02448v3 2023-03-15T15:42:05Z

In a previous paper, we showed that a class of time travel paradoxes which cannot be resolved using Novikov's self-consistency conjecture can be resolved by assuming the existence of multiple histories or parallel timelines. However, our proof was obtained using a simplistic toy model, which was formulated using contrived laws of physics. In the present paper we define and analyze a new model of time travel paradoxes, which is more compatible with known physics. This model consists of a traversable Morris-Thorne wormhole time machine in 3+1 spacetime dimensions. We define the spacetime topology and geometry of the model, calculate the geodesics of objects passing through the time machine, and prove that this model inevitably leads to paradoxes which cannot be resolved using Novikov's conjecture, but can be resolved using multiple histories. An open-source simulation of our new model using Mathematica is available for download on GitHub. We also provide additional arguments against the Novikov self-consistency conjecture by considering two new paradoxes, the switch paradox and the password paradox, for which assuming self-consistency inevitably leads to counter-intuitive consequences. Our new results provide more substantial support to our claim that if time travel is possible, then multiple histories or parallel timelines must also be possible.

2021-10-06T01:36:08Z 28 pages, 5 figures, source code available at https://github.com/bshoshany/WormholeParadoxSimulation Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 55, 44 (2023) Barak Shoshany Jared Wogan 10.1007/s10714-023-03094-8 http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.00543v2 2023-03-14T15:09:46Z

We introduce a framework that can be used to model both mathematics and human reasoning about mathematics. This framework involves {stochastic mathematical systems} (SMSs), which are stochastic processes that generate pairs of questions and associated answers (with no explicit referents). We use the SMS framework to define normative conditions for mathematical reasoning, by defining a ``calibration'' relation between a pair of SMSs. The first SMS is the human reasoner, and the second is an ``oracle'' SMS that can be interpreted as deciding whether the question-answer pairs of the reasoner SMS are valid. To ground thinking, we understand the answers to questions given by this oracle to be the answers that would be given by an SMS representing the entire mathematical community in the infinite long run of the process of asking and answering questions. We then introduce a slight extension of SMSs to allow us to model both the physical universe and human reasoning about the physical universe. We then define a slightly different calibration relation appropriate for the case of scientific reasoning. In this case the first SMS represents a human scientist predicting the outcome of future experiments, while the second SMS represents the physical universe in which the scientist is embedded, with the question-answer pairs of that SMS being specifications of the experiments that will occur and the outcome of those experiments, respectively. Next we derive conditions justifying two important patterns of inference in both mathematical and scientific reasoning: i) the practice of increasing one's degree of belief in a claim as one observes increasingly many lines of evidence for that claim, and ii) abduction, the practice of inferring a claim's probability of being correct from its explanatory power with respect to some other claim that is already taken to hold for independent reasons.

2022-09-01T15:39:38Z 43 pages of text, 6 pages of references, 11 pages of appendices David H. Wolpert David B. Kinney http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01450v2 2023-03-12T00:56:00Z

We describe a case of indeterminacy in general relativity for homogeneous and isotropic cosmologies for a class of dark energy fluids. The cosmologies are parametrized by an equation of state variable, with one instance giving the same solution as Norton's mechanical dome. Our example goes beyond previously studied cases in that indeterminacy lies in the evolution of spacetime itself: the onset of the Big Bang is indeterminate. We show further that the indeterminacy is resolved if the dynamics is viewed relationally.

2020-11-03T03:39:00Z 11 pages; title & abstract changes; references added; version to appear in Foundations of Physics Viqar Husain Vladimir Tasic http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06352v1 2023-03-11T09:08:48Z

It is often claimed that the fundamental laws of physics are deterministic and time-symmetric and that therefore our experience of the passage of time is an illusion. This paper will critically discuss these claims and show that they are based on the misconception that the laws of physics are an exact and complete description of nature. I will argue that all supposedly fundamental deterministic and time-symmetric laws have their limitations and are supplemented by stochastic and irreversible elements. In fact, a deterministic description of a system is valid only as long as interactions with the rest of the world can be ignored. The most famous example is the quantum measurement process that occurs when a quantum system interacts with a macroscopic environment such as a measurement apparatus. This environment determines in a top-down way the possible outcomes of the measurement and their probabilities. I will argue that more generally the possible events that can occur in a system and their probabilities are the result of top-down influences from the wider context. In this way the microscopic level of a system is causally open to influences from the macroscopic environment. In conclusion, indeterminism and irreversibility are the result of a system being embedded in a wider context.

2023-03-11T09:08:48Z This paper is based on a talk given at the MG16 conference in July 2021, and it appeared this year in the proceedings of this conference (online, open access, and print) Proceedings of the MG16 Meeting on General Relativity, World Scientific, 2023, pg 3631-3645 Barbara Drossel 10.1142/9789811269776_0300