https://arxiv.org/api/i+jh3YP7AsuyP5I+Y+TO9naCasE2026-06-23T20:54:58Z5624120015http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.14060v5Weak values and the past of a quantum particle2023-04-23T05:03:07ZWe investigate four key issues with using a nonzero weak value of the spatial projection operator to infer the past path of an individual quantum particle. First, we note that weak measurements disturb a system, so any approach relying on such a perturbation to determine the location of a quantum particle describes the state of a disturbed system, not that of a hypothetical undisturbed system. Secondly, even assuming no disturbance, there is no reason to associate the non-zero weak value of an operator containing the spatial projection operator with the classical idea of `particle presence'. Thirdly, weak values are only measurable over ensembles, and so to infer properties of individual particles from values of them is problematic. Finally, weak value approaches to the path of a particle do not provide information beyond standard quantum mechanics (and the classical modes supporting the experiment). We know of no experiment with testable consequences that demonstrates a connection between particle presence and weak values.2021-09-28T21:44:13Z10 pages, 2 figures. Matches published versionPhys. Rev. Research 5, 023048 (2023)Jonte R. HanceJohn RarityJames Ladyman10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023048http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11248v1Torsion in the Classical Spacetime Context2023-04-21T20:51:02ZTeleparallel gravity, an empirically equivalent counterpart to General Relativity, represents the influence of gravity using torsional forces. It raises questions about theory interpretation and underdetermination. To better understand the torsional forces of Teleparallel gravity, we consider a context in which forces are better understood: classical spacetimes. We propose a method of incorporating torsion into the classical spacetime context that yields a classical theory of gravity with a closed temporal metric and spacetime torsion. We then prove a result analogous to the Trautman degeometrization theorem, that every model of Newton-Cartan theory gives rise, non-uniquely, to a model of this theory.2023-04-21T20:51:02ZPhilos. sci. 91 (2024) 1262-1273Helen MeskhidzeJames Owen Weatherall10.1017/psa.2023.136http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10327v2Towards a Benchmark for Scientific Understanding in Humans and Machines2023-04-21T08:57:06ZScientific understanding is a fundamental goal of science, allowing us to explain the world. There is currently no good way to measure the scientific understanding of agents, whether these be humans or Artificial Intelligence systems. Without a clear benchmark, it is challenging to evaluate and compare different levels of and approaches to scientific understanding. In this Roadmap, we propose a framework to create a benchmark for scientific understanding, utilizing tools from philosophy of science. We adopt a behavioral notion according to which genuine understanding should be recognized as an ability to perform certain tasks. We extend this notion by considering a set of questions that can gauge different levels of scientific understanding, covering information retrieval, the capability to arrange information to produce an explanation, and the ability to infer how things would be different under different circumstances. The Scientific Understanding Benchmark (SUB), which is formed by a set of these tests, allows for the evaluation and comparison of different approaches. Benchmarking plays a crucial role in establishing trust, ensuring quality control, and providing a basis for performance evaluation. By aligning machine and human scientific understanding we can improve their utility, ultimately advancing scientific understanding and helping to discover new insights within machines.2023-04-20T14:05:53ZMinds and Machines, 34(1), 1-16Kristian Gonzalez BarmanSascha CaronTom ClaassenHenk de Regt10.1007/s11023-024-09657-1http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06149v1The Asymmetric Sunrise Effect on Thales' Alleged Measurement of the Sun Angular Size2023-04-21T00:19:07ZReports from the 2nd and 3rd Century AD attribute the first measurement of the angular size of the Sun to Thales of Miletus, in the 6th Century BC. Cleomedes, also in the 2nd Century AD, described a method to perform the measurement, based on timing the duration of the sunrise. Several modern authors have suggested Thales used Cleomedes' method, but others are skeptical of the connection. Here I present an objection that has not been discussed in the literature, namely, that the proportionality between the size of the Sun and the duration of sunrise is not constant, but changes with latitude and time of the year, due to what I call the ``asymmetric sunrise effect''. I show that this effect is large enough to have prevented Thales from obtaining the roughly accurate recorded value.2023-04-21T00:19:07Z6 pages, 3 figures, PASJ acceptedPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp.L12-L17 (2023)Jorge Cuadra10.1093/pasj/psad026http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10609v1The two laws of engines in general, information and the meaning of entropy2023-04-20T19:13:57ZThe association of information with entropy has been argued on plausibility arguments involving the operation of imaginary engines and beings, and it is not a universal theorem. In this paper, a theorem by Charles Bennett on reversible computation is recognized as the much needed theorem. It is proposed a real, non thermal engine, operated by humans. Its operation has stages analogous to the stages in Bennett's reversible three-tape computer. The engine makes possible to prove two results: (1) the engine operates on two laws, similar to the laws of thermodynamics, which are conditions on the possibility of resetting the engine; (2) entropy is the measure of erased information, and is measured in physical units, which complies with Landauer's principle. A prototype at work is shown in video.2023-04-20T19:13:57ZPenha Maria Cardozo Diashttp://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11051v1On the Categoricity of Quantum Mechanics2023-04-20T06:19:13ZThe paper offers an argument against an intuitive reading of the Stone-von Neumann theorem as a categoricity result, thereby pointing out that, against what is usually taken to be the case, this theorem does not entail any model-theoretical difference between the theories that validate it and those that don't.2023-04-20T06:19:13Z20 pagesEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science 11, 1-14, 2021Iulian D. Toader10.1007/s13194-020-00328-3http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10067v1Annotated bibliography: Philosophy of Astrophysics2023-04-20T03:21:33ZThe following annotated bibliography contains a reasonably complete survey of contemporary work in the philosophy of astrophysics. Spanning approximately forty years from the early 1980s to the present day, the bibliography should help researchers entering the field to acquaint themselves with its major texts, while providing an opportunity for philosophers already working on astrophysics to expand their knowledge base and engage with unfamiliar material.2023-04-20T03:21:33Z28 pages, 79 entries, forthcoming 2023Cameron C. Yetmanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05707v2Critique of optical coherence tomography in epistemological metrology2023-04-18T16:50:59ZThis treaties aims to introduce a speculative framework to comprehend modern metrology. In a classical sense, measurement measures physically existing quantities, such as length, mass, and time. By contrast, modern measurement measures a wide spectrum of objects, for example, an imaging biomarker, which is a user-defined pattern. Artificial-intelligence (AI)-based diagnosis is another example. If we regard an optical coherence tomography (OCT) device equipped with diagnostic AI as a comprehensive "measurement system," the object being measured is a "disease," which is not a physical quantity but a concept.
To comprehend the wide range of modern measurements, we introduce a speculative, i.e., philosophical and theoretical, model called the "epistemological-metrology model." In this model, we describe the act of measurement as cascading encoding-and-decoding processes. In the encoding processes, three types of objects-to-be measured are considered, which include substance, existence, and concept. Then we classify acts of measurement into "sensing," "understanding," and "reasoning," which measure the substance, existence, and concept, respectively.
We note that the measurements in the understanding and reasoning classes are constructive. Namely, they proactively define the quantity-to-be-measured by the measurement modalities themselves. A speculative method to warrant the relevance of such constructive measurements is presented.
We investigate several modern OCT-related measurements, including AI-based diagnosis, types of polarization sensitive OCT, and attenuation coefficient imaging, using our theoretical framework.2022-11-10T17:25:26ZYoshiaki Yasunohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10270v1Spacetime Singularities and Invariance2023-04-18T15:26:36ZThis paper explains why spacetime singularities do not constitute a breakdown of physical laws, and points out that the difference between the metrics at singularities and those outside of singularities is factual, rather than nomological.2023-04-18T15:26:36ZBelgrade Philosophical Annual 29, 67-78, 2016O. Cristi StoicaIulian D. Toader10.5937/BPA1629067Shttp://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08829v1Einstein Completeness as Categoricity2023-04-18T08:52:36ZThis paper provides an algebraic reconstruction of Einstein's own argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics -- the one that he thought did not make it into the EPR paper -- in order to clarify the assumptions that underlie an understanding of Einstein completeness as categoricity, the sense in which it is a type of descriptive completeness, and some of the various ways in which it has been more often misconstrued.2023-04-18T08:52:36ZFound Phys 53, 39 (2023)Iulian D. Toader10.1007/s10701-023-00675-0http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08540v1Relativistic probability densities for location2023-04-17T18:14:42ZImposing the Born rule as a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics would require the existence of normalizable wave functions also for relativistic particles. Indeed, the Fourier transforms of normalized k-space amplitudes yield normalized x-space wave packets which reproduce the standard k-space expectation values for energy and momentum from local momentum pseudo-densities. However, in the case of bosonic fields, the wave packets are nonlocally related to the corresponding relativistic quantum fields, and therefore the canonical local energy-momentum densities differ from the pseudo-densities and appear nonlocal in terms of the wave packets. We examine the relation between the canonical energy density, the canonical charge density, the energy pseudo-density, and the Born density for the massless free Klein-Gordon field. We find that those four proxies for particle location are tantalizingly close even in this extremely relativistic case: In spite of their nonlocal mathematical relations, they are mutually local in the sense that their maxima do not deviate beyond a common position uncertainty $Δx$. Indeed, they are practically indistinguishable in cases where we would expect a normalized quantum state to produce particle-like position signals, viz. if we are observing quanta with momenta $p\ggΔp\ge\hbar/2Δx$. We also translate our results to massless Dirac fields. Our results confirm and illustrate that the normalized energy density provides a suitable measure for positions of bosons, whereas normalized charge density provides a suitable measure for fermions.2023-04-17T18:14:42Z34 pages, 23 figures. Please see paper for full abstract with LaTeX symbols includedJoshua G. FenwickRainer Dickhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07757v1Revisiting Quantum Contextuality in an Algebraic Framework2023-04-16T12:06:44ZWithin the framework of quantum contextuality, we discuss the ideas of extracontextuality and extravalence, that allow one to relate Kochen-Specker's and Gleason's theorems. We emphasize that whereas Kochen-Specker's is essentially a no-go theorem, Gleason's provides a mathematical justification of Born's rule. Our extracontextual approach requires however a way to describe the ``Heisenberg cut''. Following an article by John von Neumann on infinite tensor products, this can be done by noticing that the usual formalism of quantum mechanics, associated with unitary equivalence of representations, stops working when countable infinities of particles (or degrees of freedom) are encountered. This is because the dimension of the corresponding Hilbert space becomes uncountably infinite, leading to the loss of unitary equivalence, and to sectorisation. Such an intrinsically contextual approach provides a unified mathematical model including both quantum and classical physics, that appear as required incommensurable facets in the description of nature.2023-04-16T12:06:44Z8 pages, 3 figures. To appear in Journal of Physics: Conference Series as the Proceedings of the DICE 2022 Conference, Castiglioncello, Italy. Section II has overlap with the unpublished preprint arXiv:2201.00371 [quant-ph]Mathias Van Den BosschePhilippe Grangierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07577v1Remembering Ludwig Dmitrievich Faddeev, our lifelong partner in mathematical physics2023-04-15T15:14:07ZWe briefly recount the long friendship that developed between Ludwig and us (Moshe Flato and I), since we first met at ICM 1966 in Moscow. That friendship extended to his school and family, and persists to this day. Its strong personal impact and main scientific components are sketched, including reflexions on what mathematical physics is (or should be).2023-04-15T15:14:07Z12 pagespp.21-32 in "Ludwig Faddeev Memorial Volume. A Life in Mathematical Physics", World Scientific (2018), free accessDaniel Sternheimer10.1142/9789813233867_0005http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.02467v2Necessitating Spacetime2023-04-09T21:08:24ZWe investigate structure that describes physical data in gravitational systems that is, to one degree or another, independent of the metric and affine structure. We dub such structure surplus structure and seek to incorporate it into our ontological commitments. An emphasis is placed on those structures which are required to constrain our models motivated by physical data. We look at the fall-offs of the gauge fields in asymptotically flat spacetimes, the computation of entanglement entropies in the AdS/CFT correspondence, and the addition of arbitrary parameters which modify the causal structure of spacetime in Kruskal coordinates. We also present a historical overview of the understanding of singularities in classical gravitation. Primary sources are turned to here. A toy cosmological model is also explored in which global topology is determined by an additional function which we prescribe as a dynamical $Λ$. Such surplus structure is classified using the language of intermediaries and positioned within the system of a shifting-scale ontology as introduced in prior work.2023-04-03T18:48:53Z24 Pages, 1 Figure, 1 Table, Typos CorrectedKyle SinghJenna Van Dykehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03673v1How research programs come apart: the example of supersymmetry and the disunity of physics2023-04-07T14:46:02ZAccording to Peter Galison, the coordination of different ``subcultures'' within a scientific field happens through local exchanges within ``trading zones''. In his view, the workability of such trading zones is not guaranteed, and science is not necessarily driven towards further integration. In this paper, we develop and apply quantitative methods (using semantic, authorship, and citation data from scientific literature), inspired by Galison's framework, to the case of the disunity of high-energy physics. We give prominence to supersymmetry, a concept that has given rise to several major but distinct research programs in the field, such as the formulation of a consistent theory of quantum gravity or the search for new particles. We show that ``theory'' and `phenomenology'' in high-energy physics should be regarded as distinct theoretical subcultures, between which supersymmetry has helped sustain scientific ``trades''. However, as we demonstrate using a topic model, the phenomenological component of supersymmetry research has lost traction and the ability of supersymmetry to tie these subcultures together is now compromised. Our work supports that even fields with an initially strong sentiment of unity may eventually generate diverging research programs and demonstrates the fruitfulness of the notion of trading zones for informing quantitative approaches to scientific pluralism.2023-04-07T14:46:02ZQuantitative Science Studies, sep. (2023) 1-25Lucas GautheronElisa Omodei10.1162/qss_a_00262