https://arxiv.org/api/BCRP41oNSbdHsS0WxhhG6rSOrhA 2026-09-11T00:59:55Z 5718 120 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.25072v1 2026-06-23T18:30:25Z

A popular view in the foundations of diffeomorphism-invariant theories is that their physical content is encoded in correlations or `observables': a set of phase space functions that have vanishing Poisson brackets with the constraints related to diffeomorphisms. In this article I study the phase space structure of models with a temporal diffeomorphism invariance and prove a series of formal results that challenge this view in a few ways. First, I show how this view is not applicable to all the phase space trajectories of every diffeomorphism-invariant theory. Second, I show how correlations can be proved to be invariant only in a way that generalizes the standard definition of invariance and in a way that does not provide smooth phase space functions. Third, I prove that spatiotemporal relations are also invariant. Fourth, I prove that spatiotemporal structures are indispensable for defining the invariant content of diffeomorphism-invariant models. Finally, I comment that these results are expected to be generalizable for models invariant under $d$-dimensional diffeomorphisms, which represents a challenge for some views in the foundations of general relativity and quantum gravity.

2026-06-23T18:30:25Z Annals of Physics, 493, 170565 (2026) Álvaro Mozota Frauca 10.1016/j.aop.2026.170565 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22767v1 2026-06-22T02:13:41Z

In quantum field theory on curved spacetime, and in locally-covariant quantum field theory, the Hadamard condition is often presented as a necessary condition on 'physically reasonable' states of the quantum field, and plays a central role in many theoretical and foundational applications - ranging from proofs of the renormalizability of Wick polynomials to derivations of the Hawking temperature. Yet despite this, the philosophical and foundational underpinnings of the Hadamard condition remain murky. I critically discuss existing motivations for the Hadamard condition in the literature, before arguing in favour of an alternative justification for the Hadamard condition, according to which it is best understood as a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a well-defined operator product on a sufficiently large space of observables of the quantum field, satisfying a variety of further conditions (thus proving a converse to a result which was already discussed in this context). This clarifies the role and status of the Hadamard condition, including its relationship to the equivalence principle, to well-definedness of physical quantities such as Wick polynomials and the expectation value of the stress-energy operator, and the sense in which Hadamard states are 'vacuum-like'.

2026-06-22T02:13:41Z Eleanor March http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.22298v1 2026-06-21T01:48:32Z

It is often asserted that quantum states for same-type particles must be symmetrized due to ``label redundancy,'' i.e. the assumption that the permutations of labels in direct-product states do not reflect any real physical distinction and thus their permutations constitute an ``exchange degeneracy''. This assumption is directly challenged by the case of scattering of same-type particles such as electrons, which involves two physically distinct scattering channels effectively corresponding to permutation of the labels. I discuss this counterexample with critical attention to an extant portrayal in the literature that omits pertinent physical content. I further note ways in which the assumption that symmetrization must be universally imposed is not supported by actual calculations of particle interactions, nor by seemingly viable particle states based on preparations and outcomes.

2026-06-21T01:48:32Z Forthcoming in a special issue of Entropy (Quantum Mereologies and Quantum Inspired Set Theories and Logics) R. E. Kastner http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21586v1 2026-06-19T16:42:30Z

Modern cosmology is often taken to provide an increasingly accurate description of the universe's underlying ontology through progressively refined mathematical models. I challenge this interpretation by arguing that the empirical success of cosmology underdetermines not only ontology but also the mathematical and conceptual frameworks used to represent observational data. I propose instead that the objective content of cosmology is best identified with cross-representational informational invariants-features of observational structure that persist across empirically adequate descriptions. These invariants can be characterized in information-theoretic terms, including correlation structure, statistical distinguishability, and limits on accessible information, and formalized using tools such as the Fisher-Rao metric on model space. On this view, cosmological models are best understood as efficient encodings of observational structure rather than uniquely privileged descriptions of fundamental reality. Scientific progress, accordingly, consists not in convergence toward a fixed ontology, but in the progressive refinement of the informational structure accessible to observation.

2026-06-19T16:42:30Z 42 pages, submitted Stefano Profumo http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08727v4 2026-06-19T13:31:19Z

There has been a surge of recent interest in the Wigner's Friend paradox, sparking several novel thought experiments and no-go theorems. The main narrative has been that Wigner's Friend highlights a counterintuitive feature that is unique to quantum theory, and which is closely related to the quantum measurement problem. Here, we challenge this view. We argue that the gist of the Wigner's Friend paradox can be reproduced without assuming quantum physics, and that it underlies a much broader class of enigmas in the foundations of physics and philosophy. To show this, we first consider several recently proposed Extended Wigner's Friend scenarios, and demonstrate that some of their implications for the absoluteness of observations can be reproduced by classical thought experiments that involve the duplication of agents. Crucially, some of these classical scenarios are technologically much easier to implement than their quantum counterparts. Then, we argue that the essential structural ingredient of all these scenarios is a feature that we call "Restriction A": that a physical theory cannot give us a probabilistic description of the observations of all agents. Finally, we argue that this difficulty is at the core of other puzzles in the foundations of physics and philosophy, and demonstrate this explicitly for cosmology's Boltzmann brain problem. Our analysis suggests that Wigner's Friend should be studied in a larger context, addressing a frontier of human knowledge beyond quantum foundations: to obtain reliable predictions for experiments in which these predictions can be privately but not intersubjectively verified.

2024-02-13T19:00:13Z 30+7 pages, 3 figures. Previous title: "Thinking twice inside the box: is Wigner's friend really quantum?''. Accepted for publication in Quantum, v4: corrected license Quantum 10, 2147 (2026) Caroline L. Jones Markus P. Mueller 10.22331/q-2026-06-30-2147 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03244v3 2026-06-18T14:53:05Z

This paper elaborates on the implications of the relationship between the Second and Third Laws and provides a comprehensive formal and historical justification for the logical redundancy of the Nernst heat theorem. By revisiting the Nernst-Einstein debate, the underlying hypotheses that lead to the traditional view of the Third Law as an independent postulate are examined. It is argued that the historical rejection of Nernst's proof -- motivated by Einstein's insistence on the practical non-performability of cycles at absolute zero -- overlooks the fact that a universal Second Law already precludes such cycles, rendering an independent Third Law an unnecessary complexity. Ultimately, the Nernst theorem is shown to be an essential consistency regulator rather than an independent physical discovery.

2026-02-03T08:23:51Z 3 figures, 1 table, 8800 words José-María Martín-Olalla http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.19664v1 2026-06-18T00:20:45Z

We reconstruct unitary quantum dynamics from a minimal axiomatic foundation built on Hilbert-space observables and isospectral evolution. The only dynamical assumption is that physical time evolution is a continuous one-parameter flow of Hermitian observables that preserves their spectra, i.e. the possible outcomes of measurement. We show that this assumption is already sufficient to force the Lax form of quantum dynamics. The Heisenberg equation, the time-dependent and time-independent Schrödinger equations, conservation laws, and good quantum numbers then follow as theorems rather than postulates. In this formulation, Lax pair theory supplies the missing dynamical bridge between the measurement structure of a Hilbert space and standard quantum evolution: the Hamiltonian is not assumed, but emerges as the generator required for an isospectral observable flow.

2026-06-18T00:20:45Z Péter Szabó http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18009v1 2026-06-16T14:53:35Z

The widely known Yin-Yang symbol (Taijitu) is based on nested circles of different radii whose areas are colored black and white such that the interface traces an $\mathcal{S}$-shaped curve. We address the question of how this symbol can be related to physical phenomena such as daytime and nighttime duration and the annual seasons. Using a simple dynamic model of daytime duration, we introduce the excess daytime fraction and reconstruct the symbol using the latitude of Zurich. In particular, we explain how the black and white areas are linked to the stability of Yin or Yang predominance. We further demonstrate that the Golden and Silver Ratios found in the geometry of the symbol carry meaning with respect to the Gregorian calendar. Finally, we construct an alternative Yin-Yang symbol using logarithmic spirals with the Golden Ratio as the growth parameter. The didactical quantitative derivation of the Yin-Yang symbol and its grounding in real-world observations can be regarded as a novel perspective on this iconic pattern.

2026-06-16T14:53:35Z Frank Schweitzer http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16606v1 2026-06-15T11:54:18Z

Conventional elements play an integral role in measuring time. Clocks unavoidably require a chosen standard of synchrony. The periodic process selected for the standard is not imposed upon us in any way. Conventionalism, in this regard, offers an insightful perspective on temporal measurement. The strong formulation of this doctrine is, however, questionable. After elaborating on strong conventionalism, it will be argued that it has three downsides: (i) it fails to properly distinguish between highly stable natural processes and complete randomness, as periodicities differ in terms of regularity; (ii) it does not explain that a clock actually measures something, to wit, parts of its own path along its worldline in spacetime; (iii) and relatedly, it omits the distinction between a temporal interval as a physical quantity and the arbitrarily chosen unit of time, leaving the distinction between temporal quantities and units a mystery. This article does not claim that strong conventionalism is incorrect; rather, considering the critical arguments against it, we may conclude that it remains an incomplete theory of what clocks measure.

2026-06-15T11:54:18Z 28 pages, 1 figure Grazer Philosophische Studien 2026 Matias Slavov 10.1163/18756735-00000267 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.16165v1 2026-06-15T03:27:03Z

In order to make the right empirical predictions Bohmian mechanics requires a special statistical boundary condition -- the distribution postulate -- but it is unclear how best to understand this condition. We show how one might use the theory of algorithmic randomness to formulate the distribution postulate as an objective constraining law. The framework requires us to say something about admissible quantum-mechanical states and measurements. In return, algorithmic Bohmian mechanics (aBM) guarantees the standard Born statistics for a collection of canonical quantum experiments in the limit, not just with high probability. The algorithmic distribution postulate provides a sharp typicality condition, clarifies the status of quantum probabilities in the deterministic theory, and provides a concrete example of how notions provided by the theory of algorithmic randomness can aid in specifying the content of a physical law.

2026-06-15T03:27:03Z 20 pages, 3 figures Jeffrey A. Barrett Eddy Keming Chen Josiah Lopez-Wild http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15995v1 2026-06-14T19:43:41Z

Super-heavy atoms ($Z > 100$) are usually studied in the context of the so-called ``Quantum Electrodynamics of Strong Fields''. In this theory the problem of the singularity in the electron energy whenever $Z > 137$ is overcome. This is done by considering the finite size of the nucleus and leads to interesting phenomena, such as the spontaneous production of positrons. Here, we show that taking into account the contribution from the Anomalous Magnetic Dipole Moment of the electron (by means of an effective theory), within a point-nucleus model, is a sufficient condition to obtain regular wave functions and physically acceptable energy values for $Z > 137$.

2026-06-14T19:43:41Z Originally circulated in 1990 as CBPF preprint CBPF-NF-027/90 and never published in a journal; deposited unrevised as a historical record (searchable OCR layer added 2026, page images unaltered). J. Auto-Neto, the corresponding author's M.Sc. advisor, passed away in 2015; deposited in his memory. 13 pages, 2 figures C. A. S. Almeida J. Auto-Neto http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15272v1 2026-06-13T12:11:23Z

Spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) is central to modern physics but is conventionally defined only for infinite systems, raising challenges for its interpretation in finite, real-world setups. This paper argues that the key to resolving this issue lies in the underappreciated role of boundary conditions in quantum systems. Inspired by both the relational approach to symmetries and the physical mechanism behind symmetry breaking, we formulate a relational interpretation of SSB: a finite system exhibits SSB relative to a reference environment which can induce perturbations across the boundary. This eliminates the need for the thermodynamic limit, offering a more physical picture of SSB that emphasizes the observable consequences of the interactions that real-life systems inevitably have with their environment. We show how, in this relational interpretation, SSB for both lattice systems and (gauge) field theories should be understood as subtle, rather than spontaneous, symmetry breaking, still in contrast to explicit symmetry breaking. We also explain how algebraic definitions of SSB for infinite systems relate to the intuitive picture of SSB in finite systems and illustrate how asymptotic boundary conditions push the environment "to infinity". In this way, our relational interpretation of SSB provides a unified conceptual framework applicable to symmetry-breaking in systems of any size.

2026-06-13T12:11:23Z 25 pages Silvester G. A. Borsboom José P. Dupont http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15224v1 2026-06-13T09:44:59Z

General Relativity (GR) is widely regarded as a paradigmatic example of a background independent theory, a feature often taken to mark a decisive conceptual advance over its Newtonian and special relativistic predecessors. Yet the notion of background independence admits multiple formalizations, and its precise physical and philosophical significance remains contested. This chapter offers a systematic analysis of the strategies that have been proposed to capture background independence in classical spacetime physics. The discussion then turns to a central open question: whether, and in what sense, a successor theory of GR -- such as a theory of quantum gravity -- should be expected to inherit GR's background independence. Drawing on contemporary debates and a range of case studies, the chapter argues that background independence is best understood as a diagnostic and comparative tool rather than as a necessary physical requirement. The resulting perspective highlights both the conceptual virtues and the interpretive costs of eliminating background structures, and helps to explain why background independence remains an open problem in contemporary foundational research.

2026-06-13T09:44:59Z 30 pages. Forthcoming in S. O. Hansson (ed.), "Comprehensive Philosophy of Science," Elsevier Antonio Vassallo 10.1016/B978-0-443-40622-5.00019-0 http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15120v1 2026-06-13T05:19:25Z

The slogan ``information is physical,'' introduced by Rolf Landauer and developed through quantum information theory and black-hole thermodynamics, has achieved near-axiomatic status in modern physics. Yet the ontological status of information remains surprisingly underexamined: most discussions either reduce information to a form of energy or treat it as a purely mathematical object. This paper proposes a third position. I argue that information is neither a physical substance nor a free-floating abstraction, but rather \emph{the structure of physically realizable alternatives} -- a counterfactual structure that a physical system instantiates in virtue of the possibility space available to it. Building on Shannon's combinatorial definition, the Landauer principle, the no-cloning theorem, and the black-hole information paradox, I show that the informational content of any physical event is constituted by the set of outcomes that \emph{could have occurred} but did not. This counterfactual reading dissolves several persistent confusions: it explains why erasing information dissipates heat without making information ``material,'' why quantum superposition is informationally richer than any classical mixture, and why information loss in black holes is physically significant beyond mere bookkeeping. The proposal sits within a structural-realist framework but departs from standard structural realism by locating the relevant structure in modal, not merely actual, relations. I conclude by sketching implications for the foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum gravity, and scientific ontology more broadly.

2026-06-13T05:19:25Z Madhurendra Mishra http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00805v2 2026-06-12T16:37:29Z

Since 1939, when Wigner published his proposal to define particles via symmetries expressed as algebraic groups, we have seen a long stream of attempts to formulate an ontology of matter based on mathematics. It has become apparent that such attempts must fail, and more particularly that we cannot derive an ontology of matter from the Standard Model on the basis of quantum field theory. We briefly recapitulate the reasons for this and demonstrate how the philosophy of physics has become scholasticised through a series of vain attempts to obtain a coherent ontology of matter. Here we propose an alternative approach in the form of an ontology of the science of physics. It draws on a framework developed by Husserl which admits not only real material entities but also the idealities which physicists make use of in their thinking. We specify the upper level of this ontology, which addresses the way in which physicists use mathematics when conducting their enquiries. This ontology provides a new perspective concerning the dilemmas of modern physics, including the measurement problem.

2026-05-30T16:44:34Z Jobst Landgrebe Barry Smith