https://arxiv.org/api/n/9j9gPCfdRUQsTbDMl+rcpgqQ42026-06-23T19:47:20Z5624118515http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06859v1Why Bohr was wrong in his response to EPR2023-05-11T14:54:34ZWe assess the analysis made by Bohr in 1935 of the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox/theorem. We explicitly describe Bohr's gedanken experiment involving a double-slit moving diaphragm interacting with two independent particles and show that the analysis provided by Bohr was flawed. We propose a different protocol correcting Bohr's version that confirms EPR dilemma: Quantum mechanics is either incomplete or non-local.2023-05-11T14:54:34ZAurélien Drezethttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19273v1Big Bang Cosmology and Religious Thought2023-05-10T11:55:06ZAlexander Friedmann and Georges Lemaître are undoubtedly the real fathers of Big Bang cosmologies. In this article I study the influences their work underwent due to some religious as well as anti-religious ideas. During his career Lemaître faced criticisms coming from non-believing scientists, who reproached him (wrongly) to have developed his primeval atom cosmology for conciliatory reasons. In the former case of Friedmann, we know that his 1922 proposal of a "creation of the world out of nothing" was criticized by Einstein for metaphysical reasons. The essence of such hostile reactions is the fact that presumably "good" scientific contents should not be influenced by religious ideas. Nevertheless, metaphysical and theological ideas can play an important role inside the science research processes, as an epistemological tool helping to clarify the use of some fundamental notions.2023-05-10T11:55:06Z12 pagesJean-Pierre Luminethttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05824v1Haag as a How-To Theorem2023-05-10T00:48:14ZHaag's theorem is a classic no-go theorem. It rigorously demonstrates there is a logical problem with the interaction picture (IP), one of the most widely used modeling tools in quantum field theory (QFT). The significance of the theorem for the use of the IP in QFT has been the subject of long-running debate, focused around how ``worried'' we should be. In this paper, we argue for an alternative and opposite perspective on Haag's theorem, rejecting the `worry' framing in favor of emphasizing the no-go theorem's implications for model development.2023-05-10T00:48:14ZDavid FreebornMarian GiltonChris Mitschhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04814v1Proof of principle for a self-governing prediction and forecasting reward algorithm2023-05-08T16:10:56ZWe use Monte Carlo techniques to simulate an organized prediction competition between a group of a scientific experts acting under the influence of a ``self-governing'' prediction reward algorithm. Our aim is to illustrate the advantages of a specific type of reward distribution rule that is designed to address some of the limitations of traditional forecast scoring rules. The primary extension of this algorithm as compared with standard forecast scoring is that it incorporates measures of both group consensus and question relevance directly into the reward distribution algorithm. Our model of the prediction competition includes parameters that control both the level of bias from prior beliefs and the influence of the reward incentive. The Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that, within the simplifying assumptions of the the model, experts collectively approach belief in objectively true facts, so long as reward influence is high and the bias stays below a critical threshold. The purpose of this work is to motivate further research into prediction reward algorithms that combine standard forecasting measures with factors like bias and consensus.2023-05-08T16:10:56Z15 pages, prepared for submission to the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social SimulationsJ. O. Gonzalez-HernandezJonathan MarinoTed RogersBrandon Velascohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10649v2Quantum Theory Needs (And Probably Has) Real Reduction2023-05-07T23:55:11ZThe traditional, standard approach to quantum theory is to assume that the theory ``really'' contains only unitary physical dynamics--i.e., that the only physically quantifiable evolution is that given by the time-dependent Schrodinger equation. This leads to two distinct classes of interpretations for the standard theory in its orthodox form: (i) an Everettian-type approach assuming that all mutually exclusive outcomes occur in different ``branches'' of the universe; or (ii) single-outcome approaches that assume a ``projection postulate'' (PP) with no accompanying physical account within quantum theory. A contrasting, unorthodox approach is to suggest forms of quantum theory that involve physical non-unitarity; these are called ``objective collapse models.'' Among these are Penrose's theory of gravitation-induced collapse and the Transactional Interpretation. The primary focus of this paper is an example demonstrating that standard quantum theory (with or without the projection postulate) can in-principle yield empirically consequential inconsistencies. Thus, it appears that for quantum theory to be viable in a realist sense (as opposed to being an instrumentalist protocol in which inconsistencies are evaded by changing the protocol), it must possess genuine, physical non-unitarity yielding well-defined single outcomes. This leads to the conclusion that objective collapse models should be more seriously considered.2023-04-20T21:25:23ZInvited contribution to a special issue of Interdisciplinary Science Reviews in honor of Sir Roger Penrose. In this version, a few new references and a few minor presentation adjustmentsR. E. Kastnerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2206.09472v2Eliminating Electron Self-Repulsion2023-05-04T18:03:03ZProblems of self-interaction arise in both classical and quantum field theories. To understand how such problems are to be addressed in a quantum theory of the Dirac and electromagnetic fields (quantum electrodynamics), we can start by analyzing a classical theory of these fields. In such a classical field theory, the electron has a spread-out distribution of charge that avoids some of the problems of self-interaction facing point charge models. However, there remains the problem that the electron will experience self-repulsion. This self-repulsion cannot be eliminated within classical field theory without also losing Coulomb interactions between distinct particles. But, electron self-repulsion can be eliminated from quantum electrodynamics in the Coulomb gauge by fully normal-ordering the Coulomb term in the Hamiltonian. After normal-ordering, the Coulomb term contains pieces describing attraction and repulsion between distinct particles and also pieces describing particle creation and annihilation, but no pieces describing self-repulsion.2022-06-19T19:30:33Z16 pages, 2 figuresFoundations of Physics 53, 65, pg. 1-15 (2023)Charles T. Sebens10.1007/s10701-023-00702-0http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00647v2DT fusion through the $^5$He $3/2+$ "Bretscher state" accounts for $\ge 25\%$ of our existence via nucleosynthesis and for the possibility of fusion energy2023-05-04T11:33:29ZIn big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), the deuterium-tritium (DT) fusion reaction, D(T,n)$α$, enhanced by the 3/2$^+$ resonance, is responsible for 99% of primordial $^4$He. This has been known for decades and has been well documented in the scientific literature. However, following the tradition adopted by authors of learned articles, it was stated in a matter-of-fact manner and not emphasized; for most people, it has remained unknown. This helium became a source for the subsequent creation of $\geq$25% of the carbon and other heavier elements and, thus, a substantial fraction of our human bodies. (To be more precise than $\geq$25% will require future simulation studies on stellar nucleosynthesis.)
Also, without this resonance, controlled fusion energy would be beyond reach. For example, for inertial confinement fusion (ICF), laser energy delivery for the National Ignition Facility (NIF) would have to be approximately 70 times larger for ignition.
Because the resonance enhances the DT fusion cross section a hundredfold, we propose that the 3/2$^+$ $^5$He excited state be referred to as the "Bretscher state" in honor of the Manhattan Project scientist who discovered it, in analogy with the well-known 7.6 MeV "Hoyle state" in $^{12}$C that allows for the resonant 3$α$ formation.2023-05-01T04:10:02Z4 pages, 4 figuresMark B. ChadwickMark W. ParisBrian M. Haineshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01308v1Retrospectively Diagnosing Einstein with Asperger's Syndrome and the Dismal Failure of Debunking Myths2023-05-02T10:32:40ZIn 2003, Simon Baron-Cohen, a world expert on autism, diagnosed Einstein posthumously with Asperger's syndrome. I think we cannot diagnose a dead person. Historians of science have fiercely objected to this trend of diagnosing deceased scientists by reconstructing from scant evidence, calling these diagnoses myths. Despite the historians' efforts at demolishing myths, Einstein has been constantly diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome. I will stick my neck out and suggest in this paper that although historians' critique of Baron-Cohen and others includes debunking myths, it piggybacks on another myth that uses the following metaphors: a dull and socially adept Einstein who worked at Zurich, Prague, Berlin, and Princeton, an industrious scientist who earned his living through his work as a professor at the university; he had a special gift of friendship and collegiality, and he was deeply embedded in the academic community. These explanations do not make sense from the perspective of Einstein sitting in his office at Princeton, let alone Einstein sitting in the patent office. This perhaps explains the tendency of people to find counterclaims and myths more persuasive than historians' explanations which seem deeply problematic.2023-05-02T10:32:40ZAn updated version of my lecture delivered at the conference "Actually Autism", Ben-Gurion University, April 20, 2023Galina Weinsteinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2006.01135v3Brainstorming about the geometric structures in the Wolfram model of fundamental physics2023-05-02T01:09:41ZIn this essay, we explore the geometric structures involved in the Wolfram model of fundamental physics. Furthermore, we propose some directions of research aiming to get the bosons and fermions out of this framework.2020-06-01T14:44:27ZI do not agree anymore with the ideas expressed in the manuscriptJose Manuel Rodriguez Caballerohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00850v1John Keith Stuart McKay: 1939 - 20222023-05-01T14:35:37ZA homage to the life and mathematics of John K. S. McKay. Obituary for the Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society.2023-05-01T14:35:37Z20 pages, 6 figures, invited by the Bulletin of the LMSYang-Hui Hehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03439v2Wolfram Model and the Technological Architecture of the Fourth Industrial Revolution2023-04-30T08:52:18ZIn this essay, we will defend the thesis that the multi-computational paradigm is a natural way of thinking about the fourth industrial revolution. This will be done considering the geometry that emerges as the continuum limit of multiway systems.2021-10-15T08:31:49ZI do not agree anymore with the ideas expressed in the manuscriptJosé Manuel Rodríguez Caballerohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00378v1The Open Systems View and the Everett Interpretation2023-04-30T03:36:45ZIt is argued that those who defend the Everett, or `Many Worlds', interpretation of quantum mechanics should embrace what we call the general quantum theory of open systems (GT) as the proper framework in which to conduct foundational and philosophical investigation in quantum physics. GT is a wider dynamical framework than its alternative, standard quantum theory (ST). This is true even though GT makes no modifications to the quantum formalism. GT rather takes a different view, what we call the open systems view, of the formalism; i.e., in GT the dynamics of systems, whose physical states are fundamentally represented by density operators, are represented as fundamentally open as specified by an in general non-unitary dynamical map. This includes, in principle, the dynamics of the universe as a whole. We argue that the more general dynamics describable in GT can be physically motivated, that there is as much prima facie empirical support for GT as there is for ST, and that GT could be fully in the spirit of the Everett interpretation -- that there might, in short, be little reason for an Everettian not to embrace the more general theoretical landscape that GT allows one to explore.2023-04-30T03:36:45Z7 pages, no figures. Identical to the published version except for changes made to conform to the journal styleQuantum Rep. 2023, 5(2), 418-425Michael E. CuffaroStephan Hartmann10.3390/quantum5020027http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14591v1Dark Energy or Modified Gravity?2023-04-28T01:55:19ZWe consider some of the epistemic benefits of exploring "theory space" in the context of modifications of general relativity with intended applications in cosmology. We show how studying modifications of general relativity can help in assessing the robustness of empirical inferences, particularly in inaccessible regimes. We also discuss challenges to sharply distinguishing apparently distinct directions in theory space.2023-04-28T01:55:19Z13 pages, 2 figures; Philosophy of Science Association symposium paper (presented Nov. 2022)Chris SmeenkJames Owen Weatherallhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0987v3Reconstruction of Ancient Egyptian Sundials2023-04-27T13:58:46ZThe article presents the results of a study of the design features of vertical and L-shaped ancient Egyptian sundials, developed their models, on the basis of which the reconstruction of the sundial was carried out. An original scheme of a simple method for a fairly accurate time measurement with their help is also proposed. The model proposed by us, which describes a vertical sundial, is a vertical sundial with an inclined gnomon that takes into account the latitude of the area. The model proposed by us is characterized by marking the hour lines from 6 to 12 o'clock every hour. From 12:00 a shift is made in the marking of the hour lines for half an hour, and then the marking is repeated every hour. As a consequence of the reconstruction of the vertical sundial, we have developed and proposed a model that describes the design features and operation of two types of L-shaped sundial. They had to work in conjunction with an inclined gnomon, like a vertical sundial, or directly with a vertical sundial. In this case, the L-shaped sundial could complement the vertical sundial by providing the ability to read hour markers and interpret the readings of the vertical sundial, as there were no inscriptions on the vertical sundial. The article also provides a decoding of the inscription from the tomb of Seti I, which has long intrigued researchers. It is proved that the inscription contains the lengths of the intervals between adjacent marks of the L-shaped sundial of the second type, where the first interval corresponds not to one hour, but to half an hour.2014-08-04T10:43:08ZLarisa Vodolazhskayahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13804v1The influence of Orthodox Christianity on cosmological ideas in Ukraine2023-04-26T19:56:08ZFor the first time in detail the influence of Orthodox Christianity on the development of cosmological ideas in Ukraine. The evolution of existing models of the birth and structure of the universe at that time was investigated. The connection between Orthodox ideas and cosmological notions in Ukraine is shown. The little-known works of the first teachers of Ukrainian academies on the studied topics are analyzed. It was established that all the models of the universe were known in Ukraine, but the texts of Orthodox theologians had great authority and influence on the development of cosmological ideas.2023-04-26T19:56:08Zin UkrainianHistory of Science and Biographical Studies (2017) Issue 4Oksana Koltachykhina