https://arxiv.org/api/74y/32ROXAWvdWTsmIyaRiCSaz42026-06-23T18:49:52Z5624117015http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19175v1God and the Big-Bang: Past and Modern Debates Between Science and Theology2023-06-01T16:52:43ZA short phenomenological account of the genesis and evolution of the universe is presented with emphasis on the primordial phases as well as its physical composition, i.e. dark matter and dark energy. We discuss Einstein's theory of General Relativity and its consequences for the birth of modern relativistic astrophysics. We introduce the Big-Bang theory of Mons. Lemaitre as well as the competing theory of the Steady State Universe of Fred Hoyle. Since Big-Bang theory appeared quite in agreement with Christian doctrine of creation, Pope Pius XII delivered a message to the pontifical Academy of Sciences in 1951 claiming a certain agreement between the creation account in the book of Genesis and the Big-Bang theory (a concordist view), a position which he did not repeat later. On the other hand, Lemaitre always kept separate the scientific and theological planes as two parallel "lines" never intersecting, i.e., as two complementary "magisteria". Similar kind of tensions, between science and theology, emerge also today with the Hartle-Hawking solution to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation in quantum cosmology and its related speculations. To avoid some sort of confusion between theological and physics concepts, we, briefly, summarise the concept of creation in Christian theology.2023-06-01T16:52:43Z15 pages, accepted in the proceedings of the conference "Eternity between Space and Time", Padua, May 19-21 2022Gabriele Gionti S. Jhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05111v2Big Steve and the State of the Universe2023-05-26T12:34:17ZI share some reminiscences of the late Steven Weinberg. Then I discuss a topic in quantum field theory which he taught me: the role of state wave functionals in deriving the $iε$ term of the Feynman propagator when using the functional formalism. This is perhaps a curiosity for in-out scattering amplitudes on flat space backgrounds, but it is has much greater significance for the in-in amplitudes of the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism in cosmology. It also touches on the fate, about which Weinberg wondered, of the large logarithms one sometimes finds in quantum corrections from inflationary particle production.2023-03-09T08:32:52Z19 pages, uses LaTeX2e, written for a special issue of Symmetry Commemorating Steven Weinberg. Version 2 slightly revised for publicationSymmetry 2023, 15(4)R. P. WoodardUniversity of Florida10.3390/sym15040856http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16194v1The Evolution of the Bell Notion of Beable: from Bohr to Primitive Ontology2023-05-25T15:55:15ZJohn S. Bell introduced the notion of beable, as opposed to the standard notion of observable, in order to emphasize the need for an unambiguous formulation of quantum mechanics. In the paper I show that Bell formulated in fact two different theories of beables. The first is somehow reminiscent of the Bohr views on quantum mechanics but, at the same time, is curiously adopted by Bell as a critical tool against the Copenhagen interpretation, whereas the second, more mature formulation was among the sources of inspiration of the so-called Primitive Ontology (PO) approach to quantum mechanics, an approach inspired to scientific realism. In the first part of the paper it is argued that, contrary to the Bell wishes, the first formulation of the theory fails to be an effective recipe for addressing the ambiguity underlying the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, whereas it is only the second formulation that successfully paves the way to the PO approach. In the second part, I consider how the distinction between the two formulations of the Bell theory of beables fares vis-a-vis the complex relationship between the theory of beables and the details of the PO approach.2023-05-25T15:55:15ZFederico Laudisahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15785v1Personal History with MEF and Some Related Topics2023-05-25T06:57:10ZWe present our personal histories with Michael Fisher. We describe how each one of us first came to Cornell University. We also discuss our many subsequent interactions and successful collaborations with him on various physics projects.2023-05-25T06:57:10ZLaTeX, 15 pages, 8 figures. To be published in "50 years of the renormalization group'', dedicated to the memory of Michael E. Fisher, edited by Amnon Aharony, Ora Entin-Wohlman, David Huse, and Leo Radzihovsky, World ScientificHelen Au-YangJacques H. H. Perkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15446v1Constraints on black hole charges in M87* and Sgr A* with the EHT observations2023-05-24T09:42:38ZIn May 2022 ICRANet organized the Workshop dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Professor Ruffini. This paper is based on the talk delivered at the meeting.
Professor Ruffini was well known for Soviet scientific community not only due to his publications in leading journals but also due Russian translations of his books where he was an author or a contributor in collection of articles.
But only in 1988 I had an opportunity to watch and listen professor R. Ruffini at the Conference dedicated to the century since the birthday of Alexander Alexandrovich Friedmann. This conference was organized in Leningrad (Soviet Union) in June during a short magic period when there are white nights there. In June 2023 we celebrate the 135th anniversary of Friedmann's birth. Friedmann and his closed friend V. K. Frederics were the founders of Soviet school of general relativity and George Gamow was one of the brilliant representative of the school and he was the author of the hot Universe model which is the most popular now. In the USSR a development of general relativity and relativistic cosmology was not smooth and only in sixties of the last century these branches of science freed from the total control of representatives of the ideology of Marxism -- Leninism. I also discussed a Soviet contribution in a discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation done by T. Shmaonov in 1957 and reasons why his supervisors did not connect these results with the hot Universe models discussed by G. Gamow. Author's results about observational features of supemassive black holes (including the black hole in our Galactic Center) are also briefly discussed, it was considered
an opportunity to evaluate a (tidal) charge of Reissner -- Nordström black hole from observational estimates of shadow size in the Galactic Center and M87* done by the EHT Collaboration based its observations in April 2017.2023-05-24T09:42:38Zpresented as a talk at ICRANet Meeting in May 2022Alexander F. Zakharovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07653v2Causal Set Quantum Gravity and the Hard Problem of Consciousness2023-05-21T18:14:33ZI develop Rafael D. Sorkin's proposal that a partially ordered process of the birth of spacetime atoms in causal set quantum gravity provides an objective physical correlate of our perception of time passing. I argue that one cannot have a fully objective, external picture of the birth process because the order in which the spacetime atoms are born is a partial order. I propose that live experience in causal set theory is an internal view of the objective birth process in which events that are neural correlates of consciousness occur. In causal set theory, what ``breathes fire'' into a neural correlate of consciousness is that which breathes fire into the whole universe: the unceasing, partially ordered process of the birth of spacetime atoms.2022-09-16T07:30:47Z22 pages, 1 figure. Version 2 is a result of discussion and feedback from colleagues and will be submitted for publication in the Proceedings of the WE-Heraeus-Seminar "Time and Clocks'', Bad Honnef, Germany, 27 Feb - 03 Mar 2023Fay Dowkerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11680v7On the influence of gravity on the propagation of light, with some comments on the A. Einstein`s 1911 Paper (1911-2022), Light Interaction With Gravity (The Mistake Made In 1911)2023-05-19T20:52:19ZThis is a review with some comments on the A. Einstein`s 1911 paper, which he published as one of his many attempts of the general theory of relativity. The main point of the idea is to propose a new approach about light and its motion as well as study the assumption made by A. Einstein concerning the possibility of the variation of the speed of light in presence of gravitational field.2022-08-23T01:57:55Z38 pages, 56 equations, a new form to derive the same results of the 1911 paper, Basic interaction between light and gravity. Comments on Albert's 1912 paper and Abraham's ideaRigoberto Martinezhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11852v1Poincare and Einstein on Mass-Energy Equivalence: A Modern Perspective on their 1900 and 1905 Papers2023-05-19T17:43:48ZBoth Poincaré in his 1900 Festschrift paper \cite{Poincare} and Einstein in his 1905 \textsl{Annalen der Physik} article \cite{Einstein} were led to $E=mc^2$ by considering electromagnetic processes taking place in vacuo. Poincaré's treatment is based on a generalization of the law of conservation of momentum to include radiation. Einstein's analysis relies solely on energy conservation and the relativity principle together with certain assumptions, which have served as the source of criticism of the paper beginning with Max Planck in 1907. We show that these objections raised by Planck and others can be traced back to Einstein's failure to make use of momentum considerations. Relevance of our findings to a proper understanding of Ives' criticism of Einstein's paper is pointed out.2023-05-19T17:43:48ZPatrick Moylanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03522v3The Neverending Story of the Eternal Wormhole and the Noisy Sycamore2023-05-18T15:52:33ZThere has been a great buzz surrounding Daniel Jafferis et al.'s latest Nature paper, "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor". The Nature paper discusses an experiment in which Google's Sycamore quantum processor is used to simulate a sparse N = 7 SYK model with 5 terms (a learned Hamiltonian). The Nature paper shows that the learned Hamiltonian preserves the key gravitational characteristics of an N = 10 SYK model with 210 terms and is sufficient to produce a traversable wormhole behavior. I will examine the experiment and discuss some philosophical challenges concerning the experiment in memory of Ian Hacking. Recently, Norman Yao and two graduate students discovered multiple flaws in Jafferis et al.'s learned Hamiltonian and uploaded a comment on the Nature paper. As expected, Jafferis and his team found a simple way to clarify the misunderstanding. They found a physical justification that allowed them to avoid the problem. In this paper, I elucidate the main arguments Yao and his students raised and the way Jafferis et al. found to save their learned Hamiltonian. I will end this paper with a philosophical comment on this recent development in the context of the learned Hamiltonian.2023-01-09T17:19:19ZGalina Weinsteinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10470v1Gravitational Machines2023-05-17T14:52:13ZA gravitational machine is defined as an arrangement of gravitating masses from which useful energy can be extracted. It is shown that such machines may exist if the masses are of normal astronomical size. A simple example of a gravitational machine, consisting of a double star with smaller masses orbiting around it, is described. It is shown that an efficient gravitational machine will also be an emitter of gravitational radiation. The emitted radiation sets a limit on the possible performance of gravitational machines, and also provides us with a possible means for detecting such machines if they exist.2023-05-17T14:52:13Z4 pages, one figureFreeman J. Dysonhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10774v2The Local Validity of Special Relativity, Part 2: Matter Dynamics2023-05-16T04:21:29ZIn this two-part essay, we distinguish several senses in which general relativity has been regarded as "locally special relativistic". In Part 1, we focused on senses in which a relativistic spacetime may be said to be "locally (approximately) Minkowskian". Here, in Part 2, we consider what it might mean to say that a matter theory is "locally special relativisitc". We isolate and evaluate three criteria in the literature and show that they are incompatible: matter theories satisfying one will generally violate others. We then consider what would happen if any of those criteria failed for a given theory.2022-06-21T23:44:42ZPart 2 of 2. 34 pagesSamuel C. FletcherJames Owen Weatherallhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10768v2The Local Validity of Special Relativity, Part 1: Geometry2023-05-16T04:18:38ZIn this two-part essay, we distinguish several senses in which general relativity has been regarded as "locally special relativistic". Here, in Part 1, we focus on senses in which a relativistic spacetime has been said to be "locally (approximately) Minkowskian". After critiquing several proposals in the literature, we present a result capturing a substantive sense in which every relativistic spacetime is locally approximately Minkowskian. We then show that Minkowski spacetime is not distinguished in this result: every relativistic spacetime is locally approximately every other spacetime in the same sense. In Part 2, we will consider "locally specially relativistic" matter theories.2022-06-21T23:06:59Z32 pages. Part 1 of 2Samuel C. FletcherJames Owen Weatherallhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07128v2Spacetime Conventionalism Revisited2023-05-15T13:12:52ZWe provide five rearticulations of the thesis that the structure of spacetime is conventional, rather than empirically determined, based upon variation of the structures that are empirically underdetermined and modal contexts in which this underdetermination occurs. Three of the five formulations of conventionalism will be found to fail. Two are found to open up new interesting problems for researchers in the foundations of general relativity. In all five cases, our analysis explores the interplay between geometric identities, symmetry, conformal structure, and the dynamical content of physical theories with the conventionalism dialectic deployed as a tool of explication, clarification, and exploration.2023-02-14T15:42:15ZUfuk I. TasdanKarim P. Y. Thébaulthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08431v1Quanta Iff Discreteness2023-05-15T08:20:27ZA brief philosophical inquiry into the foundations of quantum mechanics is presented here. In particular, the direct relationship between granularity, discontinuity, and the presence of quantum effects will be argued. Furthermore, an "interpretation of relational interpretation" will be supported, which, in combination with the problem of logical undecidability, produces a promising approach that places the apparent illogicality of QM within the realm of logic and effectively addresses its usual paradoxes.2023-05-15T08:20:27ZInternational Journal of Quantum Foundations 9(2023)174-181Marcello Polettihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07326v1A perspective on Lindblad's Non-Equilibrium Entropy2023-05-12T09:00:08ZGöran Lindblad in 1983 published a monograph on non-equilibrium thermodynamics. We here summarize the contents of this book, and provide a perspective on its relation to later developments in statistical physics and quantum physics. We high-light two aspects. The first is the idea that while all unitaries can be allowed in principle, different theories result from limiting which unitary evolutions are realized in the real world. The second is that Lindblad's proposal for thermodynamic entropy (as opposed to information-theoretic entropy) foreshadows much more recent investigations into optimal quantum transport which is a current research focus in several fields.2023-05-12T09:00:08Z32 pages, one figure. Invited contribution to the Lindblad memorial volume, to be published in Open Systems and Information Dynamics (2023)Erik AurellRyoichi Kawai10.1142/S123016122380001X