https://arxiv.org/api/74y/32ROXAWvdWTsmIyaRiCSaz4 2026-06-23T18:49:52Z 5624 1170 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19175v1 God and the Big-Bang: Past and Modern Debates Between Science and Theology 2023-06-01T16:52:43Z A short phenomenological account of the genesis and evolution of the universe is presented with emphasis on the primordial phases as well as its physical composition, i.e. dark matter and dark energy. We discuss Einstein's theory of General Relativity and its consequences for the birth of modern relativistic astrophysics. We introduce the Big-Bang theory of Mons. Lemaitre as well as the competing theory of the Steady State Universe of Fred Hoyle. Since Big-Bang theory appeared quite in agreement with Christian doctrine of creation, Pope Pius XII delivered a message to the pontifical Academy of Sciences in 1951 claiming a certain agreement between the creation account in the book of Genesis and the Big-Bang theory (a concordist view), a position which he did not repeat later. On the other hand, Lemaitre always kept separate the scientific and theological planes as two parallel "lines" never intersecting, i.e., as two complementary "magisteria". Similar kind of tensions, between science and theology, emerge also today with the Hartle-Hawking solution to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation in quantum cosmology and its related speculations. To avoid some sort of confusion between theological and physics concepts, we, briefly, summarise the concept of creation in Christian theology. 2023-06-01T16:52:43Z 15 pages, accepted in the proceedings of the conference "Eternity between Space and Time", Padua, May 19-21 2022 Gabriele Gionti S. J http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05111v2 Big Steve and the State of the Universe 2023-05-26T12:34:17Z I share some reminiscences of the late Steven Weinberg. Then I discuss a topic in quantum field theory which he taught me: the role of state wave functionals in deriving the $iε$ term of the Feynman propagator when using the functional formalism. This is perhaps a curiosity for in-out scattering amplitudes on flat space backgrounds, but it is has much greater significance for the in-in amplitudes of the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism in cosmology. It also touches on the fate, about which Weinberg wondered, of the large logarithms one sometimes finds in quantum corrections from inflationary particle production. 2023-03-09T08:32:52Z 19 pages, uses LaTeX2e, written for a special issue of Symmetry Commemorating Steven Weinberg. Version 2 slightly revised for publication Symmetry 2023, 15(4) R. P. Woodard University of Florida 10.3390/sym15040856 http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16194v1 The Evolution of the Bell Notion of Beable: from Bohr to Primitive Ontology 2023-05-25T15:55:15Z John S. Bell introduced the notion of beable, as opposed to the standard notion of observable, in order to emphasize the need for an unambiguous formulation of quantum mechanics. In the paper I show that Bell formulated in fact two different theories of beables. The first is somehow reminiscent of the Bohr views on quantum mechanics but, at the same time, is curiously adopted by Bell as a critical tool against the Copenhagen interpretation, whereas the second, more mature formulation was among the sources of inspiration of the so-called Primitive Ontology (PO) approach to quantum mechanics, an approach inspired to scientific realism. In the first part of the paper it is argued that, contrary to the Bell wishes, the first formulation of the theory fails to be an effective recipe for addressing the ambiguity underlying the standard formulation of quantum mechanics, whereas it is only the second formulation that successfully paves the way to the PO approach. In the second part, I consider how the distinction between the two formulations of the Bell theory of beables fares vis-a-vis the complex relationship between the theory of beables and the details of the PO approach. 2023-05-25T15:55:15Z Federico Laudisa http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15785v1 Personal History with MEF and Some Related Topics 2023-05-25T06:57:10Z We present our personal histories with Michael Fisher. We describe how each one of us first came to Cornell University. We also discuss our many subsequent interactions and successful collaborations with him on various physics projects. 2023-05-25T06:57:10Z LaTeX, 15 pages, 8 figures. To be published in "50 years of the renormalization group'', dedicated to the memory of Michael E. Fisher, edited by Amnon Aharony, Ora Entin-Wohlman, David Huse, and Leo Radzihovsky, World Scientific Helen Au-Yang Jacques H. H. Perk http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15446v1 Constraints on black hole charges in M87* and Sgr A* with the EHT observations 2023-05-24T09:42:38Z In May 2022 ICRANet organized the Workshop dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Professor Ruffini. This paper is based on the talk delivered at the meeting. Professor Ruffini was well known for Soviet scientific community not only due to his publications in leading journals but also due Russian translations of his books where he was an author or a contributor in collection of articles. But only in 1988 I had an opportunity to watch and listen professor R. Ruffini at the Conference dedicated to the century since the birthday of Alexander Alexandrovich Friedmann. This conference was organized in Leningrad (Soviet Union) in June during a short magic period when there are white nights there. In June 2023 we celebrate the 135th anniversary of Friedmann's birth. Friedmann and his closed friend V. K. Frederics were the founders of Soviet school of general relativity and George Gamow was one of the brilliant representative of the school and he was the author of the hot Universe model which is the most popular now. In the USSR a development of general relativity and relativistic cosmology was not smooth and only in sixties of the last century these branches of science freed from the total control of representatives of the ideology of Marxism -- Leninism. I also discussed a Soviet contribution in a discovery of cosmic microwave background radiation done by T. Shmaonov in 1957 and reasons why his supervisors did not connect these results with the hot Universe models discussed by G. Gamow. Author's results about observational features of supemassive black holes (including the black hole in our Galactic Center) are also briefly discussed, it was considered an opportunity to evaluate a (tidal) charge of Reissner -- Nordström black hole from observational estimates of shadow size in the Galactic Center and M87* done by the EHT Collaboration based its observations in April 2017. 2023-05-24T09:42:38Z presented as a talk at ICRANet Meeting in May 2022 Alexander F. Zakharov http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07653v2 Causal Set Quantum Gravity and the Hard Problem of Consciousness 2023-05-21T18:14:33Z I develop Rafael D. Sorkin's proposal that a partially ordered process of the birth of spacetime atoms in causal set quantum gravity provides an objective physical correlate of our perception of time passing. I argue that one cannot have a fully objective, external picture of the birth process because the order in which the spacetime atoms are born is a partial order. I propose that live experience in causal set theory is an internal view of the objective birth process in which events that are neural correlates of consciousness occur. In causal set theory, what ``breathes fire'' into a neural correlate of consciousness is that which breathes fire into the whole universe: the unceasing, partially ordered process of the birth of spacetime atoms. 2022-09-16T07:30:47Z 22 pages, 1 figure. Version 2 is a result of discussion and feedback from colleagues and will be submitted for publication in the Proceedings of the WE-Heraeus-Seminar "Time and Clocks'', Bad Honnef, Germany, 27 Feb - 03 Mar 2023 Fay Dowker http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11680v7 On the influence of gravity on the propagation of light, with some comments on the A. Einstein`s 1911 Paper (1911-2022), Light Interaction With Gravity (The Mistake Made In 1911) 2023-05-19T20:52:19Z This is a review with some comments on the A. Einstein`s 1911 paper, which he published as one of his many attempts of the general theory of relativity. The main point of the idea is to propose a new approach about light and its motion as well as study the assumption made by A. Einstein concerning the possibility of the variation of the speed of light in presence of gravitational field. 2022-08-23T01:57:55Z 38 pages, 56 equations, a new form to derive the same results of the 1911 paper, Basic interaction between light and gravity. Comments on Albert's 1912 paper and Abraham's idea Rigoberto Martinez http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11852v1 Poincare and Einstein on Mass-Energy Equivalence: A Modern Perspective on their 1900 and 1905 Papers 2023-05-19T17:43:48Z Both Poincaré in his 1900 Festschrift paper \cite{Poincare} and Einstein in his 1905 \textsl{Annalen der Physik} article \cite{Einstein} were led to $E=mc^2$ by considering electromagnetic processes taking place in vacuo. Poincaré's treatment is based on a generalization of the law of conservation of momentum to include radiation. Einstein's analysis relies solely on energy conservation and the relativity principle together with certain assumptions, which have served as the source of criticism of the paper beginning with Max Planck in 1907. We show that these objections raised by Planck and others can be traced back to Einstein's failure to make use of momentum considerations. Relevance of our findings to a proper understanding of Ives' criticism of Einstein's paper is pointed out. 2023-05-19T17:43:48Z Patrick Moylan http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03522v3 The Neverending Story of the Eternal Wormhole and the Noisy Sycamore 2023-05-18T15:52:33Z There has been a great buzz surrounding Daniel Jafferis et al.'s latest Nature paper, "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor". The Nature paper discusses an experiment in which Google's Sycamore quantum processor is used to simulate a sparse N = 7 SYK model with 5 terms (a learned Hamiltonian). The Nature paper shows that the learned Hamiltonian preserves the key gravitational characteristics of an N = 10 SYK model with 210 terms and is sufficient to produce a traversable wormhole behavior. I will examine the experiment and discuss some philosophical challenges concerning the experiment in memory of Ian Hacking. Recently, Norman Yao and two graduate students discovered multiple flaws in Jafferis et al.'s learned Hamiltonian and uploaded a comment on the Nature paper. As expected, Jafferis and his team found a simple way to clarify the misunderstanding. They found a physical justification that allowed them to avoid the problem. In this paper, I elucidate the main arguments Yao and his students raised and the way Jafferis et al. found to save their learned Hamiltonian. I will end this paper with a philosophical comment on this recent development in the context of the learned Hamiltonian. 2023-01-09T17:19:19Z Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10470v1 Gravitational Machines 2023-05-17T14:52:13Z A gravitational machine is defined as an arrangement of gravitating masses from which useful energy can be extracted. It is shown that such machines may exist if the masses are of normal astronomical size. A simple example of a gravitational machine, consisting of a double star with smaller masses orbiting around it, is described. It is shown that an efficient gravitational machine will also be an emitter of gravitational radiation. The emitted radiation sets a limit on the possible performance of gravitational machines, and also provides us with a possible means for detecting such machines if they exist. 2023-05-17T14:52:13Z 4 pages, one figure Freeman J. Dyson http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10774v2 The Local Validity of Special Relativity, Part 2: Matter Dynamics 2023-05-16T04:21:29Z In this two-part essay, we distinguish several senses in which general relativity has been regarded as "locally special relativistic". In Part 1, we focused on senses in which a relativistic spacetime may be said to be "locally (approximately) Minkowskian". Here, in Part 2, we consider what it might mean to say that a matter theory is "locally special relativisitc". We isolate and evaluate three criteria in the literature and show that they are incompatible: matter theories satisfying one will generally violate others. We then consider what would happen if any of those criteria failed for a given theory. 2022-06-21T23:44:42Z Part 2 of 2. 34 pages Samuel C. Fletcher James Owen Weatherall http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10768v2 The Local Validity of Special Relativity, Part 1: Geometry 2023-05-16T04:18:38Z In this two-part essay, we distinguish several senses in which general relativity has been regarded as "locally special relativistic". Here, in Part 1, we focus on senses in which a relativistic spacetime has been said to be "locally (approximately) Minkowskian". After critiquing several proposals in the literature, we present a result capturing a substantive sense in which every relativistic spacetime is locally approximately Minkowskian. We then show that Minkowski spacetime is not distinguished in this result: every relativistic spacetime is locally approximately every other spacetime in the same sense. In Part 2, we will consider "locally specially relativistic" matter theories. 2022-06-21T23:06:59Z 32 pages. Part 1 of 2 Samuel C. Fletcher James Owen Weatherall http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07128v2 Spacetime Conventionalism Revisited 2023-05-15T13:12:52Z We provide five rearticulations of the thesis that the structure of spacetime is conventional, rather than empirically determined, based upon variation of the structures that are empirically underdetermined and modal contexts in which this underdetermination occurs. Three of the five formulations of conventionalism will be found to fail. Two are found to open up new interesting problems for researchers in the foundations of general relativity. In all five cases, our analysis explores the interplay between geometric identities, symmetry, conformal structure, and the dynamical content of physical theories with the conventionalism dialectic deployed as a tool of explication, clarification, and exploration. 2023-02-14T15:42:15Z Ufuk I. Tasdan Karim P. Y. Thébault http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08431v1 Quanta Iff Discreteness 2023-05-15T08:20:27Z A brief philosophical inquiry into the foundations of quantum mechanics is presented here. In particular, the direct relationship between granularity, discontinuity, and the presence of quantum effects will be argued. Furthermore, an "interpretation of relational interpretation" will be supported, which, in combination with the problem of logical undecidability, produces a promising approach that places the apparent illogicality of QM within the realm of logic and effectively addresses its usual paradoxes. 2023-05-15T08:20:27Z International Journal of Quantum Foundations 9(2023)174-181 Marcello Poletti http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07326v1 A perspective on Lindblad's Non-Equilibrium Entropy 2023-05-12T09:00:08Z Göran Lindblad in 1983 published a monograph on non-equilibrium thermodynamics. We here summarize the contents of this book, and provide a perspective on its relation to later developments in statistical physics and quantum physics. We high-light two aspects. The first is the idea that while all unitaries can be allowed in principle, different theories result from limiting which unitary evolutions are realized in the real world. The second is that Lindblad's proposal for thermodynamic entropy (as opposed to information-theoretic entropy) foreshadows much more recent investigations into optimal quantum transport which is a current research focus in several fields. 2023-05-12T09:00:08Z 32 pages, one figure. Invited contribution to the Lindblad memorial volume, to be published in Open Systems and Information Dynamics (2023) Erik Aurell Ryoichi Kawai 10.1142/S123016122380001X