https://arxiv.org/api/syXxxXrigpdeANq/FOBmkHdfj8o2026-06-23T17:47:12Z5624115515http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01909v1The Story of Bose, Photon Spin and Indistinguishability2023-06-14T07:35:50ZAs we approach the centenary of the discovery of quantum statistics in 1924, it is important to revisit Bose's original derivation of Planck's law usually ignored in most standard presentations of Bose-Einstein statistics. It introduced not only the novel concept of the indistinguishability of photons but also of their intrinsic spin, a fact unknown to most physicists.2023-06-14T07:35:50Z6 pages, no figuresPartha Ghosehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04025v2Gravity from Transactions: Fulfilling the Entropic Gravity Program2023-06-14T00:52:32ZThis is a review of new developments in entropic gravity in light of the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation (RTI). A transactional approach to spacetime events can give rise in a natural way to entropic gravity (in the way originally proposed by Erik Verlinde) while also overcoming extant objections to that research program. The theory also naturally gives rise to a Cosmological Constant and to Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and thus provides a physical explanation for the phenomena historically attributed to "dark energy" and "dark matter".2022-09-08T20:32:26ZFinal accepted version, Journal of Physics Communications (2023)A. SchlatterR. E. Kastner10.1088/2399-6528/acd6d7http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07794v1An Elementary Proof That Everett's Quantum Multiverse Is Nonlocal: Bell-Locality and Branch-Symmetry in the Many-Worlds Interpretation2023-06-13T14:15:56ZEverett's many-worlds or multiverse theory is an attempt to find an alternative to the standard Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Everett's theory is often claimed to be local in the Bell sense. Here, we show that this is not the case and debunk the contradictions by analyzing in detail the Greenberger--Horne--Zeilinger (GHZ) nonlocality theorem. We discuss and compare different notions of locality often mixed in the Everettian literature and try to explain the nature of the confusion. We conclude with a discussion of probability and statistics in the many-worlds theory and stress that the strong symmetry existing between branches in the theory prohibits the definition of probability and that the theory cannot recover statistics. The only way out from this contradiction is to modify the theory by adding hidden variables à la Bohm and, as a consequence, the new theory is explicitly Bell-nonlocal.2023-06-13T14:15:56ZSymmetry 2023, 15(6)Aurélien Drezet10.3390/sym15061250http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07498v1Complementarity and entanglement in a simple model of inelastic scattering2023-06-13T02:20:49ZA simple model coupling a one-dimensional beam particle to a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator is used to explore complementarity and entanglement. This model, well-known in the inelastic scattering literature, is presented under three different conceptual approaches, with both analytical and numerical techniques discussed for each. In a purely classical approach, the final amplitude of the oscillator can be found directly from the initial conditions. In a partially quantum approach, with a classical beam and a quantum oscillator, the final magnitude of the quantum-mechanical amplitude for the oscillator's first excited state is directly proportional to the oscillator's classical amplitude of vibration. Nearly the same first-order transition probabilities emerge in the partially and fully quantum approaches, but conceptual differences emerge. The two-particle scattering wavefunction clarifies these differences and allows the consequences of quantum entanglement to be explored.2023-06-13T02:20:49Z10 pages, 5 figures. Forthcoming from American Journal of PhysicsDavid Kordahl10.1119/5.0141389http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10206v2Six Measurement Problems of Quantum Mechanics2023-06-12T16:37:39ZThe notorious `measurement problem' has been roving around quantum mechanics for nearly a century since its inception, and has given rise to a variety of `interpretations' of quantum mechanics, which are meant to evade it. We argue that no less than six problems need to be distinguished, and that several of them classify as different types of problems. One of them is what traditionally is called `the measurement problem' (here: the Reality Problem of Measurement Outcomes). Another of them has nothing to do with measurements but is a profound metaphysical problem. We also analyse critically Maudlin's (1995) well-known statement of `three measurements problems', and the clash of the views of Brown (1986) and Stein (1997) on one of the six measurement problems, concerning so-called Insolubility Theorems. Finally, we summarise a solution to one measurement problem which has been largely ignored but tacitly if not explicitly acknowledged.2023-05-17T13:29:23Z35 pages, 2 figures, with table of contentsF. A. Mullerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06424v1Electromagnetism in the Encyclopaedias2023-06-10T12:29:38ZThe paper is based on a talk given to celebrate Ørsted's discovery of electromagnetism in 1820. It gives a brief account of Ørsted's life and work, before using the evidence of articles on electricity and magnetism in the Encyclopaedia Britannica to assess understanding of the connection between the two phenomena in the 20 years before Ørsted's discovery, and the immediate reception of it.2023-06-10T12:29:38Z12 pages. The newsletter that this appears in may sometime appear on the publisher's website https://www.iop.org/physics-community/special-interest-groups/history-physics-groupInstitute of Physics History of Physics Group Newsletter 39 (Oct 2022) 20-36Isobel Falconerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05489v1Amy Ogle2023-06-10T11:50:34ZA short account of the life of Amy Ogle, who, in 1876, was the first woman to come top of the Natural Sciences Tripos at Cambridge.2023-06-10T11:50:34Z2 pages. For published version see pp 16-17 of CavMag 28 at https://www.phy.cam.ac.uk/files/cavmag_28_2022_online.pdfCavMag 28 (2022) 16-17Isobel Falconerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06411v1Historical Notes: The Gravitational Constant2023-06-10T11:06:35ZA brief account of the development of the concept of the gravitational constant and the debate around in in Britain at the end of the 19th century.2023-06-10T11:06:35Z2 pagesMathematics Today 58(4) (2022) 126-127Isobel Falconerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07067v1Urania Propitia2023-06-10T10:05:36ZA brief account of Maria Cunitz's book Urania Propitia, commemorating the bequest of a rare copy to the London Mathematical Society by Dr A.E.L. Davis in 2020.2023-06-10T10:05:36Z2 pages. For the published version in the LMS Newsletter, see pp 8-9 of https://www.lms.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/NLMS_496_for%20web_0.pdfLMS Newsletter (Sept 2021) 8-9Isobel FalconerUniversity of St Andrewshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06020v1There's Plenty of Room in the Middle: The Unsung Revolution of the Renormalization Group2023-06-09T16:40:00ZThe remarkable technical contributions of Michael E. Fisher to statistical physics and the development of the renormalization group are widely known and deeply influential. But less well-known is his early and profound appreciation of the way in which renormalization group created a revolution in our understanding of how physics -- in fact, all science -- is practiced, and the concomitant adjustment that needs to be made to our conception of the purpose and philosophy of science. In this essay, I attempt to redress this imbalance, with examples from Fisher's writings and my own work. It is my hope that this tribute will help remove some of the confusion that surrounds the scientific usage of minimal models and renormalization group concepts, as well as their limitations, in the ongoing effort to understand emergence in complex systems.
This paper will be published in "50 years of the renormalization group", dedicated to the memory of Michael E. Fisher, edited by Amnon Aharony, Ora Entin-Wohlman, David Huse and Leo Radzihovsky, World Scientific (in press).2023-06-09T16:40:00ZNigel Goldenfeldhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12033v2Free agency and determinism: is there a sensible definition of computational sourcehood?2023-06-06T17:26:51ZCan free agency be compatible with determinism? Compatibilists argue that the answer is yes, and it has been suggested that the computer science principle of "computational irreducibility" sheds light on this compatibility. It implies that there cannot in general be shortcuts to predict the behavior of agents, explaining why deterministic agents often appear to act freely. In this paper, we introduce a variant of computational irreducibility that intends to capture more accurately aspects of actual (as opposed to apparent) free agency: computational sourcehood, i.e. the phenomenon that the successful prediction of a process' behavior must typically involve an almost-exact representation of the relevant features of that process, regardless of the time it takes to arrive at the prediction. We argue that this can be understood as saying that the process itself is the source of its actions, and we conjecture that many computational processes have this property. The main contribution of this paper is technical: we analyze whether and how a sensible formal definition of computational sourcehood is possible. While we do not answer the question completely, we show how it is related to finding a particular simulation preorder on Turing machines, we uncover concrete stumbling blocks towards constructing such a definition, and demonstrate that structure-preserving (as opposed to merely simple or efficient) functions between levels of simulation play a crucial role.2021-01-27T16:19:54Z16 pages, 1 figureEntropy 25(6), 903 (2023)Marius KrummMarkus P. Mueller10.3390/e25060903http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00003v1The Physics of Life: No such thing as a dumb question2023-06-05T16:39:35ZPhysics of Life research in the UK is proving to be transformative to scientific insight and translational impact, but challenges remain. Here I discuss its disruptive potential and the barriers to interdisciplinary research seen through the lens of the activities of one of its pioneers, Tom McLeish, FRS.2023-06-05T16:39:35ZMark C Leakehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11095v2The Open Systems View2023-06-02T14:26:44ZThere is a deeply entrenched view in philosophy and physics, the closed systems view, according to which isolated systems are conceived of as fundamental. On this view, when a system is under the influence of its environment this is described in terms of a coupling between it and a separate system which taken together are isolated. We argue against this view, and in favor of the alternative open systems view, for which systems interacting with their environment are conceived of as fundamental, and the environment's influence is represented via the dynamical equations that govern the system's evolution. Taking quantum theories of closed and open systems as our case study, and considering three alternative notions of fundamentality: (i)~ontic fundamentality, (ii)~epistemic fundamentality, and (iii)~explanatory fundamentality, we argue that the open systems view is fundamental, and that this has important implications for the philosophy of physics, the philosophy of science, and for metaphysics.2021-12-21T10:57:44Z47 pages (not including references), 1 figurePhilosophy of Physics 2(1) (2024) 6 1-27Michael E. CuffaroStephan Hartmann10.31389/pop.90http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.11635v2A Role for the Fauxrizon in the Semiclassical Limit of a Fuzzball2023-06-02T14:17:42ZRecent work on the status of astrophysical modeling in the wake of quantum gravity indicates that a 'fauxrizon' (portmanteau of 'faux horizon'), such as is relevant to understanding astrophysical black holes according to the fuzzball proposal within string theory, might ultimately solve the familiar black hole evaporation paradox. I clarify, with general upshots for the foundations of quantum gravity research, some of what this suggestion would amount to: identification of intertheoretic constraints on global spacetime structure in (observer-relative) semiclassical models of fuzzballs.2022-05-23T21:04:40ZFinal preprint version (accepted at Philosophy of Science)Mike D. Schneiderhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04121v3Physical grounds for causal perspectivalism2023-06-02T02:49:33ZWe ground the asymmetry of causal relations in the internal physical states of a special kind of open and irreversible physical system, a causal agent. A causal agent is an autonomous physical system, maintained in a steady state, far from thermal equilibrium, with special subsystems: sensors, actuators, and learning machines. Using feedback, the learning machine, driven purely by thermodynamic constraints, changes its internal states to learn probabilistic functional relations inherent in correlations between sensor and actuator records. We argue that these functional relations just are causal relations learned by the agent, and so such causal relations are simply relations between the internal physical states of a causal agent. We show that learning is driven by a thermodynamic principle: the error rate is minimised when the dissipated power is minimised. While the internal states of a causal agent are necessarily stochastic, the learned causal relations are shared by all machines with the same hardware embedded in the same environment. We argue that this dependence of causal relations on such `hardware' is a novel demonstration of causal perspectivalism.2020-09-09T06:15:46Z25 pages. Extensively revised version with additional author. Revised list of referencesG. J. MilburnS. ShrapnelP. W. Evans