https://arxiv.org/api/4lOjA2eJH5W8Yxsrl76pAWETQro 2026-06-23T15:37:00Z 5624 1125 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14625v4 2023-07-19T20:50:33Z

We develop and apply a multi-dimensional account of explanatory depth towards a comparative analysis of inflationary and bouncing paradigms in primordial cosmology. Our analysis builds on earlier work due to Azhar and Loeb (2021) that establishes initial conditions fine-tuning as a dimension of explanatory depth relevant to debates in contemporary cosmology. We propose dynamical fine-tuning and autonomy as two further dimensions of depth in the context of problems with instability and trans-Planckian modes that afflict bouncing and inflationary approaches respectively. In the context of the latter issue, we argue that the recently formulated trans-Planckian censorship conjecture leads to a trade-off for inflationary models between dynamical fine-tuning and autonomy. We conclude with the suggestion that explanatory preference with regard to the different dimensions of depth is best understood in terms of differing attitudes towards heuristics for future model building.

2022-10-26T11:08:55Z fixed typos in accepted version. Forthcoming in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2023) British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2023) William J. Wolf Karim P. Y. Thébault 10.1086/725096 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09899v1 2023-07-19T10:58:01Z

This paper investigates the historical origin and ancestors of typicality, which is now a central concept in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics and Bohmian Mechanics. Although Ludwig Boltzmann did not use the word typicality, its main idea, namely, that something happens almost always or is valid for almost all cases, plays a crucial role for his explanation of how thermodynamic systems approach equilibrium. At the beginning of the 20th century, the focus on almost always or almost everywhere was fruitful for developing measure theory and probability theory. It was apparently Hugh Everett III who first mentioned typicality in physics in 1957 while searching for a justification of the Born rule in his interpretation of quantum mechanics. The historically closest concept before these developments is moral certainty, which was invented by the medieval French theologian Jean Gerson, and it became a standard concept at least until the Age of Enlightenment, when Jakob Bernoulli proved the Law of Large numbers.

2023-07-19T10:58:01Z Forthcoming in Bassi, A., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghì, N., editors, Physics and the Nature of Reality: Essays in Memory of Detlef Dürr. Heidelberg: Springer Mario Hubert http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06568v1 2023-07-18T16:29:43Z

This article gives an overview of the new SI and a few details as to how its setting up was achieved. Those interested in the story of how the kilogram was fixed by tying it to the Planck constant can go straight to section five. Otherwise, apart from the introduction given as section one which also presents excerpts from the relevant official documents on key aspects of the new system, section two gives a brief timeline of the history of the decimal metric system, section three gives a few details of the procedural steps -- from the setting up of a standard of measurement to its percolation to the public, taking the time standard as an example and, section four attempts to give a flavour of the actual process of the setting up of a standard.

2023-07-18T16:29:43Z 16 pages, 5 figures, written for Resonance - Journal of Science Education, published by the Indian Academy of Sciences Indulekha Kavila 10.1007/s12045-020-0984-0 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07856v1 2023-07-15T17:29:35Z

Albert and Callender have challenged the received view that theories like classical electrodynamics and non-relativistic quantum mechanics are time reversal invariant. They claim that time reversal should correspond to the mere reversal of the temporal order of the instantaneous states, without any accompanying change of the instantaneous state as in the standard view. As such, Albert and Callender claim, these theories are not time reversal invariant. The view of Albert and Callender has been much criticized, with many philosophers arguing that time reversal may correspond to more than the reversal of the temporal order. In this paper, we will not so much engage with that aspect of the debate, but rather deflate the disagreement by exploiting the ontological underdetermination. Namely, it will be argued that with a suitable choice of ontology, these theories are in fact time reversal invariant in the sense of Albert and Callender, in agreement with the standard view.

2023-07-15T17:29:35Z 19 pages, no figures, LaTex, to appear in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 76, 3 (2025) Ward Struyve 10.1086/721089 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07668v1 2023-07-15T00:30:56Z

I dissent from the standard assertion of a "Two Times Problem," in which physical time is taken as being at odds with the human sense of a "flow of time." I provide a brief overview of the case to be made for the contrary view: namely, that physical theory is indeed consistent with a genuine temporal dynamism that takes into account the quantum level in connection with spacetime emergence, the latter being supervenient on specific quantum processes.

2023-07-15T00:30:56Z Invited Comment on Gruber, Block and Montemayor (2022). To appear in Timing and Time Perception Ruth E. Kastner http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.14838v2 2023-07-14T01:05:18Z

We train a generative language model on the randomized local measurement data collected from Schrödinger's cat quantum state. We demonstrate that the classical reality emerges in the language model due to the information bottleneck: although our training data contains the full quantum information about Schrödinger's cat, a weak language model can only learn to capture the classical reality of the cat from the data. We identify the quantum-classical boundary in terms of both the size of the quantum system and the information processing power of the classical intelligent agent, which indicates that a stronger agent can realize more quantum nature in the environmental noise surrounding the quantum system. Our approach opens up a new avenue for using the big data generated on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices to train generative models for representation learning of quantum operators, which might be a step toward our ultimate goal of creating an artificial intelligence quantum physicist.

2023-06-26T16:44:53Z 17 pages, 9 figures Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol. 5, 015051, (2024) Zhelun Zhang Yi-Zhuang You 10.1088/2632-2153/ad3330 http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05355v4 2023-07-13T20:52:58Z

Conservation laws that are based on the divergence of a second-rank four-tensor are fundamentally different from conservation laws based on the divergence of a four-vector. This article investigates the consequences of this difference for understanding the relation between electromagnetic field momentum and the flow of electromagnetic field energy. Momentum and energy conservation require electromagnetic field momentum and energy to be treated as physically real, even in static fields. This motivates the conjecture that field momentum might be due to the flow of a relativistic mass density (energy density divided by the square of the speed of light). This article investigates the velocity of such flow and finds a conflict between two different definitions of it. This investigation is careful to respect the transformation rules of special relativity. The paper demonstrates that the consensus definition of the flow velocity of electromagnetic energy is inconsistent with the transformation rules of special relativity, and hence is incorrect. A correct flow velocity is then derived which is completely consistent with those transformation rules. The conclusion is that these conflicting definitions of flow velocity cannot be resolved in a way that is consistent with special relativity and that also allows electromagnetic field momentum to be the result of energy flow. Though real, field momentum cannot be explained as the flow of field energy. As a byproduct of the study, it is also shown that there is a comoving system in which the electromagnetic energy-momentum tensor is reduced to a simple diagonal form, with two of its diagonal elements equal to the energy density and the other two diagonal elements equal to plus and minus a single parameter derived from the electromagnetic field values, a result that places constraints on possible fluid models of electromagnetism.

2021-05-11T22:19:56Z Oliver Davis Johns http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05166v1 2023-07-11T10:51:48Z

This paper analyzes the ergodic hypothesis in the context of Boltzmann's late work in statistical mechanics, where Boltzmann lays the foundations for what is today known as the typicality account. I argue that, based on the concepts of stationarity (of the measure) and typicality (of the equilibrium state), the ergodic hypothesis, as an idealization, is a consequence rather than an assumption of Boltzmann's approach. More precisely, it can be shown that every system with a stationary measure and an equilibrium state (be it a state of overwhelming phase space or time average) behaves essentially as if it were ergodic. I claim that Boltzmann was aware of this fact as it grounds both his notion of equilibrium, relating it to the thermodynamic notion of equilibrium, and his estimate of the fluctuation rates.

2023-07-11T10:51:48Z Paula Reichert http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11132v2 2023-07-11T08:33:10Z

The article reveals the error that in classical thermodynamics leads to the Gibbs paradox. The essence of the error lies in the fact that the entropy of an ideal gas is attributed to additive quantities, but it is not correct. The value of an additive quantity for a whole object is equal to the sum of its values for the parts of the object in any division of the object into parts. The entropy of an ideal gas in classical thermodynamics is expressed by the equation that contains the term Rnln(V/n), where n is the number of moles of gas, V is the volume of gas, R is the universal gas constant, or by equations equivalent to it. As a result, the entropy of an ideal gas is equal to the sum of the entropies of its parts only if the parts of the gas are in different places (separated by an impermeable partition). If the parts of the gas form a mixture, then the sum of the entropies of the parts is not equal to the entropy of the gas. Despite this, the entropy of an ideal gas is considered to be an additive quantity. This gives rise to a series of inexplicable conclusions known as various formulations of the Gibbs paradox.

2023-04-19T18:11:18Z 20 pages, editorial changes made Volodymyr Ihnatovych http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00842v2 2023-07-11T05:59:48Z

We examine evaluations of the contributions of Matrix Mechanics and Max Born to the formulation of quantum mechanics from Heisenberg's Helgoland paper of 1925 to Born's Nobel Prize of 1954. We point out that the process of evaluation is continuing in the light of recent interpretations of the theory that deemphasize the importance of the wave function.

2023-05-21T16:33:49Z 58 pages John L. Heilbron Carlo Rovelli http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.01614v2 2023-07-10T23:22:17Z

Arguing from his "hole" thought experiment, Einstein became convinced that, in cases in which the energy-momentum-tensor source vanishes in a spacetime hole, a solution to his general relativistic field equation cannot be uniquely determined by that source. After reviewing the definition of active diffeomorphisms, this paper uses them to outline a mathematical proof of Einstein's result. The relativistic field equation is shown to have multiple solutions, just as Einstein thought. But these multiple solutions can be distinguished by the different physical meaning that each metric solution attaches to the local coordinates used to write it. Thus the hole argument, while formally correct, does not prohibit the subsequent rejection of spurious solutions and the selection of a physically unique metric. This conclusion is illustrated using the Schwarzschild metric. It is suggested that the Einstein hole argument therefore cannot be used to argue against substantivalism.

2019-07-02T20:04:25Z Oliver Davis Johns 10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.04.008 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05611v1 2023-07-10T22:51:32Z

David Bohm has put forward the first deterministic interpretation of quantum physics, and for this he seems to be regarded as a champion of determinism by physicists (both his contemporaries and the supporters of his interpretation, the so-called "Bohmians") as well as by historians of physics. The standard narrative is that he underwent a "conversion" from being a supporter of Bohr to being a staunch determinist, due to his interaction with Einstein and his commitment to Marxism. Here we show that Bohm actually upheld with continuity throughout his career some philosophical tenets that included a strong rejection of mechanistic determinism. As such, we conclude that Bohm was never a Bohmian and that his philosophical views have been largely misinterpreted.

2023-07-10T22:51:32Z 18 pages + references and appendices Oldofredi, A. (Ed.). (2025). Guiding Waves in Quantum Mechanics: One Hundred Years of de Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory. Oxford University Press Flavio Del Santo Gerd Christian Krizek 10.1093/oso/9780198901853.003.0007 http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03583v3 2023-07-07T09:17:09Z

The 2022 Tel Aviv conference on the Many Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics highlighted many differences between theorists. A very significant dichotomy is between Everettian fission (splitting) and Saunders-Wallace-Wilson divergence. For fission, an observer may have multiple futures, whereas for divergence they always have a single future. Divergence was explicitly introduced to resolve the problem of pre-measurement uncertainty for Everettian theory, which is universally believed to be absent for fission. Here, I maintain that there is indeed uncertainty about future observations prior to fission, so long as objective probability is a property of Everettian branches. This is made possible if the universe is a set and branches are subsets with probability measure. A universe which is a set of universes which are macroscopically isomorphic and span all possible configurations of microscopic local beäbles fulfils that role. If objective probability is a property of branches, a successful Deutsch-Wallace decision-theoretic argument would justify the Principal Principle and be part of probability theory rather than being specific to Many Worlds. Any macroscopic object in our environment becomes a set of isomorphs with different microscopic configurations, each in an elemental universe (elemental in the set-theoretic sense). This is similar to Many Interacting Worlds theory but the observer inhabits the set of worlds, not an individual world. An observer has many elemental bodies.

2023-06-06T10:56:40Z 20 pages. Earlier version published in Quantum Reports, 2 March 2023 Paul Tappenden http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00608v5 2023-07-06T17:57:08Z

The received view in foundations and philosophy of physics holds that if we reject supplementing quantum theory (QT) with certain hidden variables and consider that unitary QT is correct and universal, we should adopt a relationalist interpretation of QT. Relationalist interpretations relativize measurement outcomes to, for example, worlds, systems, agents, or reference frames. It includes the Many-Worlds Interpretation, Relational Quantum Mechanics, and QBism. These interpretations have potential costs connected with their relationalism that make them unattractive. Thus, if there exists a non-relational non-hidden variable universal intepretations of QT, it should be taken seriously. I will present an interpretation of this kind called Environmental Determinacy-based or EnD Quantum Theory (EnDQT), which goes beyond relationalism and the received view. EnDQT circumvents relationalism by constructing an account of indeterminate and determinate values and underlying quantum properties that is not relational while maintaining unitary non-hidden variable universal QT. In situations where a relationalist assumes that measurement outcomes are relativized, such as in the extended Wigner's friend scenarios, according to EnDQT there aren't determinate outcomes but systems with non-relational indeterminate values. In this approach, determinate values arose at some point in time through certain systems and persist due to them via certain interactions represented by certain networks. When there is isolation from the rest of the systems that belong to these networks, such as inside the friend's lab in the extended Wigner's friend scenarios, indeterminate values non-relationally arise inside. I will discuss other independent good reasons for adopting EnDQT, including providing a local causal explanation of Bell correlations and novel empirical posits represented by these networks.

2023-04-02T19:39:36Z An extended version of a shorter version of the paper for publication. This version provides the big picture underlying this view and a more complete defense of it. It also includes an account of what is like to be a quantum AI agent running on a Quantum Computer. For a brief introduction to the view, see section 1 Francisco Pipa http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10781v3 2023-07-06T16:20:39Z

Entropy bounds have played an important role in the development of holography as an approach to quantum gravity, so in this article we seek to gain a better understanding of the covariant entropy bound. We observe that there is a possible way of thinking about the covariant entropy bound which would suggest that it encodes an epistemic limitation rather than an objective count of the true number of degrees of freedom on a light-sheet; thus we distinguish between ontological and epistemic interpretations of the covariant bound. We consider the consequences that these interpretations might have for physics and we discuss what each approach has to say about gravitational phenomena. Our aim is not to advocate for either the ontological or epistemic approach in particular, but rather to articulate both possibilities clearly and explore some arguments for and against them.

2023-03-19T22:08:49Z Some edits based on comments from reviewers and colleagues Emily Adlam