https://arxiv.org/api/vOujZOJP4LqZ7mHMu4XYQaTu1bQ 2026-06-23T14:41:13Z 5624 1110 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07783v4 2023-08-03T14:26:01Z

The Big Bang singularity in standard model cosmology suggests a program of study in 'early universe' quantum gravity phenomenology. Inflation is usually thought to undermine this program's prospects by means of a dynamical diluting argument, but such a view has recently been disputed within inflationary cosmology, in the form of a 'trans-Planckian censorship' conjecture. Meanwhile, trans-Planckian censorship has been used outside of inflationary cosmology to motivate alternative early universe scenarios that are tightly linked to ongoing theorizing in quantum gravity. Against the resulting trend toward early universe quantum gravity phenomenology within and without inflation, Ijjas and Steindhardt suggest a further alternative: a 'generalized cosmic censorship' principle. I contrast the generalized cosmic censorship principle with the logic of its namesake, the cosmic censorship conjectures. I also remark on foundational concerns in the effective field theory approach to cosmology beyond the standard model, which would be based on that principle.

2022-06-15T19:46:55Z Final preprint version, accepted at Foundations of Physics. An early version of this paper misstated the scope of the intended argument, and was subsequently withdrawn out of respect for those invested in related areas of research. Versions thereafter resolved that issue, among other revisions. Notably, in the present version, technical details of the toy model at the end have been clarified Mike D. Schneider http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00697v1 2023-08-01T17:56:27Z

The paper discusses Daniel Jafferis et al.'s "Nature" publication on "Traversable wormhole dynamics on a quantum processor." The experiment utilized Google's Sycamore quantum processor to simulate a sparse SYK model with a learned Hamiltonian. A debate ensued when Bryce Kobrin, Thomas Schuster, and Norman Yao raised concerns about the learned Hamiltonian's reliability, which Jafferis and the team addressed. Recently, there has been an update in the wormhole experiment saga. In an attempt to rescue the commuting Hamiltonian from its inevitable fate of being invalidated, a recent paper by Ping Gao proposed a creative solution to reinvigorate the concept within the context of teleportation through wormholes. This paper delves into the ongoing debate and the recent endeavor to address the comments made by Kobrin et al. I remain skeptical about the efforts to address Kobrin et al.'s challenges. By its nature, a commuting Hamiltonian does not exhibit chaotic behavior like non-commuting Hamiltonians. Moreover, it's always essential to assess the sensitivity of the Hamiltonian to noise to understand its practical feasibility for the real-world Sycamore processor.

2023-08-01T17:56:27Z Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16054v1 2023-07-29T19:25:03Z

We adopt a top-down approach to agency aimed at developing a minimalist, scalable and naturalized account of it. After providing a general definition, we explore some possible extensions and refinements, domain of applicability, as well as a comparison with other recent accounts of agency, and possible objections to our proposal. With respect to what we classify as strong (such as Tononi's) and weak (such as Rovelli's) characterizations, our notion of agency situates itself in a middle position - our intent being precisely that of spelling out the advantages of this median account within a variety of contexts, such as the interpretation of quantum mechanics, the debate on the nature of physical laws and Bayesianism.

2023-07-29T19:25:03Z 20 pages Ali Barzegar Emilia Margoni Daniele Oriti http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00814v1 2023-07-29T06:59:31Z

The field of interpretation of quantum mechanics emerged in an attempt to solve the measurement problem. This turned on the perception that Niels Bohr avoided addressing the measurement problem by taking an instrumentalist view of quantum mechanics. I argue that this view is mistaken and Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics is realist. Moreover, Bohr's interpretation, which is different from textbook quantum mechanics (which is due more to Von Neumann and Paul Dirac), succeeds in solving the measurement problem. While the claim that Bohr dissolves the measurement problem within the limits of the epistemological framework he assumes has been made by a few authors, rarely has the case been made that Bohr's project unambiguously and completely overcomes the measurement problem. I make the strong case that Bohr eliminated the measurement problem altogether. For this, I put forward two new postulates through which to make sense of Bohr's interpretation. The article thus seeks to single out Bohr's interpretation from the various views that go together under the umbrella of orthodox quantum mechanics, and which have been traditionally considered susceptible to the measurement problem. It shows that Bohr's interpretation should be classified along with those like hidden variable theories, collapse models, modal interpretations etc., which offer a solution to the measurement problem and are committed to a realist ontology.

2023-07-29T06:59:31Z 22 pages Govind Krishnan. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09608v2 2023-07-28T15:35:22Z

Despite quantum theory's remarkable success, many philosophers worry that it nonetheless lacks some crucial connection between theory and experiment. One under-discussed aspect of the Quantum Measurement Problems is that it is sometimes unclear how to model our measurement processes in order to extract experimental predictions. Without a solution to these pragmatic worries, quantum theory would be at risk of losing both its evidential support and its physical salience. Avoiding these risks requires solving the Pragmatic Measurement Problem. For non-relativistic quantum theory, this problem has been solved as follows: One can model each of quantum theory's key experimental successes on a case-by-case in terms of measurement chains and Heisenberg cuts. From here, one can then strive for a wide-scoping measurement theory capable of modeling all (or nearly all) possible measurement processes. Indeed, for non-relativistic quantum theory this leads us to our usual projective measurement theory. But how does this story have to change when we move into the context of quantum field theory (QFT)? It is well known that in QFT almost all localized projective measurements violate causality, allowing for faster-than-light signaling. Despite this, I will argue that we can proceed largely as we did in the non-relativistic case. We first ought to build up a case-by-case measurement framework for QFT by using measurement chains and Heisdenberg-like cuts (where we switch from a QFT model to a non-QFT model). We can then strive for both a new measurement theory for QFT and an empirically meaningful characterization of its observables. It is at this point that significantly more theoretical work is needed. This paper ends by briefly reviewing the state of the art in the physics literature regarding the modeling of measurement processes involving quantum fields.

2022-05-19T15:01:59Z 26 pages, 7 Figures Daniel Grimmer http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14174v1 2023-07-26T13:02:11Z

In 1939 Albert Einstein wrote a technical article that argued against the possibility that a star can be contracted to a single point: particles making up the star would end up rotating at velocities that were too high. In the same year, Robert Oppenheimer, together with his student Hartland Snyder, drew an apparently exactly opposite conclusion: that when a sufficiently heavy star runs out of nuclear fuel, it will collapse into an infinitely dense point, closed off from the rest of the universe. Both Oppenheimer and Einstein would soon be preoccupied by choices of an altogether different nature; and, again, set out on a different course.

2023-07-26T13:02:11Z 12 pp., to appear in: B.C. Odom and D. Kennefick (eds.), "One hundred years testing Einstein", MIT Press Jeroen van Dongen http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04506v1 2023-07-23T13:12:13Z

Complemented lattices and uniquely complemented lattices are very important, not only in mathematics, but also in physics, biology, and even in social sciences. They have been investigated for a long time, especially by Huntington, Birkhoff, Dilworth and others. And yet, on some of these structures - namely, uniquely complemented nondistributive lattices -, despite the many existing articles concerning them, we basically know very little. In this article, we situate these lattest structures in the context of complemented and uniquely complemented lattices, offering a general overview of the links between these lattices and others, close to them, such as the orthocomplemented lattices of physics as well as various other partially ordered sets. We finally show how uniquely complemented nondistributive lattices have been constructed with the technique of free lattices.

2023-07-23T13:12:13Z 34 pages, 11 figures Daniel Parrochia http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12148v1 2023-07-22T19:08:00Z

We look into the ontology of quantum theory as distinct from that of the classical theory in the sciences, following a broadly Kantian tradition and distinguishing between the noumenal and phenomenal realities where the former is independent of our perception while the latter is assembled from the former by means of fragmentary bits of interpretation. Within this framework, theories are conceptual constructs applying to models generated in the phenomenal world within limited contexts.The ontology of quantum theory principally rests on the view that entities in the world are pervasively correlated with one another not by means of probabilities as in the case of the classical theory, but by means of probability amplitudes involving finely tuned phases of quantum mechanical states (entanglement). The quantum correlations are shared globally in the process of environment-induced decoherence whereby locally generated correlations are removed, the removal being especially manifest in the case of systems that appear as classical ones, in which case the process is almost instantaneous, being, in all likelihood, driven by field fluctuations in the Planck regime. This points to factors of an unknown nature determining its finest details, since Planck scale physics remains an obscure terrain. In other words, the present day quantum theory holds within a limited context set by the Planck scale.

2023-07-22T19:08:00Z 33 pages, no figures Avijit Lahiri http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12997v1 2023-07-22T11:57:09Z

Ever since its beginnings, standard quantum mechanics has been associated with a metaphysical view according to which the theory deals with non-individual objects, i.e., objects deprived of individuality in some sense of the term. We shall examine the grounds of the claim according to which quantum mechanics is so closely connected with a metaphysics of non-individuals. In particular, we discuss the attempts to learn the required `metaphysical lessons' required by quantum mechanics coming from four distinct roads: from the formalism of the theory, treating separately the case of the physics and the underlying logic; from the ontology of the theory, understood as the furniture of the world according to the theory; and, at last, we analyze whether a metaphysics of non-individuals is indispensable from a purely metaphysical point of view. We argue that neither non-individuality nor individuality is not to be found imposed on us in any of these levels so that it should be seen as a metaphysical addition to the theory, rather than as a lesson from it.

2023-07-22T11:57:09Z Forthcoming in J. R. B. Arenhart, R. W. Arroyo (eds.), Non-Reflexive Logics, Non-Individuals, and the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: Essays in Honour of the Philosophy of Décio Krause, Springer, Synthese Library 476, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31840-5_5 Jonas R. B. Arenhart Raoni W. Arroyo 10.1007/978-3-031-31840-5_5 http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02338v1 2023-07-22T09:23:36Z

The notion that nature is subject to laws is exciting from many different viewpoints. This paper is based on the context of modern cosmology and presents a more philosophical discussion. It will list the significant interdisciplinary implications generated by various aspects of the contemporary scientific discussion about the status of laws of nature, especially their dynamic nature. Recent work highlights how multiple aspects of the observed universe still lack explanation and that several problems of standard cosmology still form the object of debate. Considering these issues, several proposals have been made that entail a revision of the concept of the law of nature, according to which the nature of time and of the relation between causality and natural laws ought to be reconsidered using approaches or viewpoints which point to philosophical issues. We argue that Tim Maudlin's concept of Fundamental Law of Temporal Evolution (FLOTE) and Nancy Cartwright's notion of the nomological machine provide new insights and valuable tools that can be used in the analysis of the status of laws in the context of cosmology and of complex systems theory. The limits of the traditional approach to laws of nature and of their mathematical formulation are highlighted in this context, as well as the fact that many of the ultimate properties of nature may turn out to be formally unpredictable or uncomputable.

2023-07-22T09:23:36Z 40 pages, no figures. Found Sci (2023) Yves Gaspar Pawel Tambor 10.1007/s10699-023-09904-1 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12993v1 2023-07-21T10:26:14Z

K. Barad proposes "agential realism" as a unified approach to natural and social phenomena. The position is inspired by quantum mechanics and in particular the phenomenon of quantum entanglement. Barad also sees similarities between her approach, N. Bohr's view and C. Rovelli's relational quantum mechanics. In our view, agential realism is a kind of ontological correlationism, not a realism. The analogy with the Bohr and Rovelli approaches is only partial. Agential realism is a wrong interpretation of quantum mechanics. It is also unsuitable for social theorizing, for which taking into account the sensitivity of ontology to the context is fundamental. As an alternative, we propose a contextual quantum realism that rejects substantive dualisms (as does Barad), but at the same time accepts the categorical dualism of the real and the ideal. Our approach also allows one to better understand Bohr's position and to correct Rovelli's relational quantum mechanics.

2023-07-21T10:26:14Z 5 pages Francois-Igor Pris http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12992v1 2023-07-21T10:14:07Z

According to one possible diagnosis of the quantum measurement problem, it is a consequence of quantum fundamentalism claiming that ontology and epistemology of the world are exclusively quantum, and classical physics is only an approximation. For N. Bohr, the measurement problem is a pseudo-problem because any quantum phenomenon presupposes the classical context of an experimental setup and the use of classical concepts to describe it. We consider Bohr's position from the point of view of our contextual quantum realism (CQR), inspired by the later Wittgenstein philosophy. Our approach is consistent with H. Zinkernagel's interpretation, according to which Bohr's position is not only epistemological anti-fundamentalism, but also ontological anti-fundamentalism.

2023-07-21T10:14:07Z 6 pages Francois-Igor Pris http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11282v1 2023-07-21T00:57:05Z

Recently there has been significant interest in using causal modelling techniques to understand the structure of physical theories. However, the notion of `causation' is limiting - insisting that a physical theory must involve causal structure already places significant constraints on the form that theory may take. Thus in this paper, we aim to set out a more general structural framework. We argue that any quantitative physical theory can be represented in the form of a generative program, i.e. a list of instructions showing how to generate the empirical data; the information-processing structure associated with this program can be represented by a directed acyclic graph (DAG). We suggest that these graphs can be interpreted as encoding relations of `ontological priority,' and that ontological priority is a suitable generalisation of causation which applies even to theories that don't have a natural causal structure. We discuss some applications of our framework to philosophical questions about realism, operationalism, free will, locality and fine-tuning.

2023-07-21T00:57:05Z 42 pages, 15 figures, 19 pages of supplementary material Mordecai Waegell Kelvin J. McQueen Emily C. Adlam http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10621v1 2023-07-20T06:39:09Z

This is a brief account of the life and work of Göran Lindblad.

2023-07-20T06:39:09Z 11 pages, one picture Open Sys. Inf. Dyn 30 (2023) 2370001 Ingemar Bengtsson 10.1142/S1230161223770012 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10606v1 2023-07-20T06:01:10Z

Since the beginning of the 20th century, a continuous evolution and perfection of what we today call the standard cosmological model has been produced, although some authors like to distinguish separate periods within this evolution. A possible historical division of the development of cosmology into six periods is: (1) the initial period (1917-1927); (2) the period of development (1927-1945); (3) the period of consolidation (1945-1965); (4) the period of acceptance (1965-1980); (5) the period of enlargement (1980-1998); and (6) the period of high-precision experimental cosmology (1998-now). The last period started with a epistemological optimism that has declined with time, and the expression "crisis in cosmology" is now stubbornly reverberating in the media. The initial expectation of removing the pending minor problems arising from the increased accuracy of measurements has backfired: the higher the precision with which the standard model tries to fit the data, the greater the number of tensions that arise, the problems proliferating rather than diminishing.

2023-07-20T06:01:10Z 9 pages, proceedings of the online symposium "Anomalies in Modern Astronomy Research" (October 22nd, 2022), organized by the Society of Scientific Exploration (SSE), to be published in "EdgeScience Magazine" of SSE. Excerpts from the book "Fundamental Ideas in Cosmology. Scientific, Philosophical and Sociological Critical Perspectives" (2022, IoP Science) EdgeScience, 53, 6-11 (2023): https://edgescience.org/history-and-problems-of-the-standard-model-in-cosmology Martin Lopez-Corredoira