https://arxiv.org/api/jBJJxLb9KHzj8Ci56ELKdGN1iHM 2026-06-23T12:50:47Z 5624 1080 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01968v1 2023-09-05T05:44:31Z

Weyl famously argued that if space were discrete, then Euclidean geometry could not hold even approximately. Since then, many philosophers have responded to this argument by advancing alternative accounts of discrete geometry that recover approximately Euclidean space. However, they have missed an importantly flawed assumption in Weyl's argument: physical geometry is determined by fundamental spacetime structures independently from dynamical laws. In this paper, I aim to show its falsity through two rigorous examples: random walks in statistical physics and quantum mechanics.

2023-09-05T05:44:31Z Accepted August 08, 2022 The British Society for the Philosophy of Science (2022) Lu Chen 10.1086/722106 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01962v1 2023-09-05T05:32:30Z

Weyl's tile argument purports to show that there are no natural distance functions in atomistic space that approximate Euclidean geometry. I advance a response to this argument that relies on a new account of distance in atomistic space, called \textit{the mixed account}, according to which \textit{local distances} are primitive and other distances are derived from them. Under this account, atomistic space can approximate Euclidean space (and continuous space in general) very well. To motivate this account as a genuine solution to Weyl's tile argument, I argue that this account is no less natural than the standard account of distance in continuous space. I also argue that the mixed account has distinctive advantages over Forrest's (1995) account in response to Weyl's tile argument, which can be considered as a restricted version of the mixed account.

2023-09-05T05:32:30Z Synthese volume 198, pages 7533-7552 (2021) Lu Chen 10.1007/s11229-020-02531-4 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02470v1 2023-09-05T05:14:56Z

In this paper, I advance an original view of the structure of space called \textit{Infinitesimal Gunk}. This view says that every region of space can be further divided and some regions have infinitesimal size, where infinitesimals are understood in the framework of Robinson's (1966) nonstandard analysis. This view, I argue, provides a novel reply to the inconsistency arguments proposed by Arntzenius (2008) and Russell (2008), which have troubled a more familiar gunky approach. Moreover, it has important advantages over the alternative views these authors suggested. Unlike Arntzenius's proposal, it does not introduce regions with no interior. It also has a much richer measure theory than Russell's proposal and does not retreat to mere finite additivity.

2023-09-05T05:14:56Z Journal of Philosophical Logic volume 49, pages 981-1004 (2020) Lu Chen 10.1007/s10992-020-09544-x http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02469v1 2023-09-05T05:09:29Z

I develop a new view of the structure of space--called infinitesimal atomism--as a reply to Zeno's paradox of measure. According to this view, space is composed of ultimate parts with infinitesimal size, where infinitesimals are understood within the framework of Robinson's nonstandard analysis. Notably, this view satisfies a version of additivity: for every region that has a size, its size is the sum of the sizes of its disjoint parts. In particular, the size of a finite region is the sum of the sizes of its infinitesimal parts. Although this view is a coherent approach to Zeno's paradox and is preferable to Skyrms's (1983) infinitesimal approach, it faces both the main problem for the standard view (the problem of unmeasurable regions) and the main problem for finite atomism (Weyl's tile argument), leaving it with no clear advantage over these familiar alternatives.

2023-09-05T05:09:29Z Synthese volume 198, pages 4441-4456 (2021) Lu Chen 10.1007/s11229-019-02350-2 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05548v2 2023-09-04T19:33:11Z

This paper explores the ER bridges theory and its relationship with quantum phenomena. An argument can be made that the ER bridges theory does not explicitly address quantum phenomena and implies that Einstein intended to differentiate between individual particles within the ER bridges theory and the systems involved in the EPR paradox. However, this paper contends that Einstein held a distinct viewpoint. He endeavored to elucidate quantum characteristics by modifying general relativity, aiming to incorporate concepts such as local realism, separability, causality, and determinism, without relying on the principles of quantum mechanics. He proposed representing elementary particles using parallel ER bridges connecting two flat sheets to achieve this.

2023-07-09T06:31:12Z This paper was presented under the title "Did Einstein connect entanglement and ER bridges?" at the conference on Foundations of Physics, Bristol, 5th July, 2023 Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16786v1 2023-08-31T15:03:34Z

Alex, the main discoverer of high Tc superconductivity, was also a dear friend. Here I offer a few frank anecdotes, possibly inaccurate in some details but heartfelt and accurate in the substance, as a personal tribute to our friendship.

2023-08-31T15:03:34Z To appear on Physica C Superconductivity -- K. Alex Müller memorial issue Erio Tosatti http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16411v1 2023-08-31T02:49:42Z

Keith Brueckner was a theoretical physicist of considerable technical power who came of age as the mysteries of the atomic nucleus were coming into focus. His fundamental contributions to the "many-body problem" had a lasting impact on our understanding of how the macroscopic behavior of matter emerges from the underlying microscopic rules. A passionate and accomplished mountain climber, he listed the American Alpine Club below the National Academy of Sciences on his vitae. During decades of complex interactions between the physics community and the United States government, he helped build structures that allowed him and many others to provide advice on classified matters, but also actively raised funds to support opposition to the war in Vietnam. At the peak of his career, he left the Ivy League to help found and build a new university in a small village filled with Marines and retirees - La Jolla, California.

2023-08-31T02:49:42Z William Bialek http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03465v2 2023-08-30T18:10:00Z

Endeavoring to formulate an exhaustive solution to the measurement problem in view of the theory of decoherence leads to a better understanding of the status of the collapse and of the emergence of classicality, thanks to a precise definition of the measurement and some new vocabulary to speak about quantum mechanics. Considering the latter as a probabilistic theory all along allows us to avoid the usual probability problem of the many-worlds interpretations. A thorough verification of the consistency of quantum mechanics at all scales is proposed, as well as a discussion of what can be deemed an observer.

2023-03-06T19:47:52Z Antoine Soulas http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16211v1 2023-08-30T12:51:35Z

This chapter argues that the general philosophy of science should learn metaphilosophical lessons from the case of metaphysical underdetermination, as it occurs in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Section 2 presents the traditional discussion of metaphysical underdetermination regarding the individuality and non-individuality of quantum particles. Section 3 discusses three reactions to it found in the literature: eliminativism about individuality; conservatism about individuality; eliminativism about objects. Section 4 wraps it all up with metametaphysical considerations regarding the epistemology of metaphysics of science.

2023-08-30T12:51:35Z Forthcoming in: Probing the Meaning of Quantum Mechanics. Aerts, D. & Arenhart, J. R. B. & de Ronde, C. & Sergioli, G. (eds.) World Scientific, 2023 Raoni Arroyo Jonas R. B. Arenhart Décio Krause 10.1142/9789811283598_0011 http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15369v1 2023-08-29T15:05:48Z

In 1834-1835, Hamilton published two papers that revolutionized classical mechanics. In these papers, he introduced the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, Hamilton's equations of motion and the principle of least action. These three formulations of classical mechanics became the forerunners of quantum mechanics, but none of these is what Hamilton was looking for: he was looking for what he called the principal function, $S(q',q'',T)$, from which the entire trajectory history can be obtained just by differentiation. Here we show that all of Hamilton's formulations can be derived just by assuming that the principal function is additive, $S(q',q'',T)=S(q',Q,t_1)+S(Q,q'',t_2)$ with $t_1+t_2=T$. This simple additivity axiom can be considered the fundamental principle of classical mechanics and shows that analytical mechanics is essentially just a footnote to the problem of finding the shortest path between two points. The simplicity of the formulation could provide new perspectives on some of the major themes in classical mechanics including symplectic geometry, periodic orbit theory and Morse theory, as well as giving new perspectives on quantum mechanics. Moreover, it could potentially provide a unified description of different areas of physics, leading to insight for example, into the transition from deterministic dynamics to statistical mechanics.

2023-08-29T15:05:48Z arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2109.09094 David J. Tannor http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07850v2 2023-08-28T13:30:49Z

Laws of motion given in terms of differential equations can not always be derived from an action principle, at least not without introducing auxiliary variables. By allowing auxiliary variables, e.g. in the form of Lagrange multipliers, an action is immediately obtained. Here, we consider some ways how this can be done, drawing examples from the literature, and apply this to Bohmian mechanics. We also discuss the possible metaphysical status of these auxiliary variables. A particularly interesting approach brings the theory in the form of a gauge theory, with the auxiliary variables as gauge degrees of freedom.

2023-07-15T17:01:26Z 15 pages, no figures, LaTex; v2 typos corrected Philosophy of Physics 1(1): 2, 1-14 (2023) Ward Struyve 10.31389/pop.28 http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14146v1 2023-08-27T16:03:43Z

Do the spacetime manifolds which feature in our best scientific theories reflect anything metaphysically weighty in the world (e.g., any fundamental substances or relations)? Should we extend our notions of space and time beyond the epistemological roles they play in helping us codify the dynamical behavior of matter? Kant famously answered ``No'' to both of these questions, contra Newton and Leibniz. This paper introduces novel technical and philosophical support for such a (Neo-)Kantian perspective on the metaphysics of space and time. To begin, I will make an explicit analogy between broadly Humean views of laws (e.g., Lewis, Demarest, etc.) and dynamics-first views of geometry (e.g., Brown). I will then continue this line of analogous views beyond the metaphysics of laws debate and the dynamical vs geometric spacetime debate by extending it into the context of spacetime topology. Namely, I will put forward a dynamics-first view of topology (in answer to Norton's problem of pre-geometry). This dynamics-first view of topology is supported by some powerful new techniques for topological redescription which I have recently developed in Grimmer (2023a) and Grimmer (2023b), namely the ISE Method. These new techniques allow us to remove and replace the topological underpinnings of our spacetime theories just as easily as we can switch between different coordinate systems. For instance, a theory set on a Möbius strip might be redescribed as being set on the Euclidean plane and vice versa. Indeed, as Grimmer (2023b) has proved, the ISE Method gives us access to effectively every possible spacetime framing of a given theory's kinematical and dynamical content. Given this overabundance of candidate spacetime framings, it is then conceivable that one can pick out a theory's topological structure via something analogous to a Best Systems Analysis.

2023-08-27T16:03:43Z 31 pages, 2 figures Daniel Grimmer http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15045v2 2023-08-27T13:18:49Z

This work analyzes the phase correlation of the three lunar cycles and the Saros/Exeligmos cycle, after the study of the chapter About Exeligmos in Introduction to the Phenomena by Geminus. Geminus, refers that each Exeligmos cycle began on very specific and rare dates, when the Moon positioned at the points of the three lunar cycles beginning: New moon at Apogee and at the Node. The extremely large duration of the Annular Solar eclipse occurred on December 22 178BC (Saros series 58), marks the start of the Prominent Saros Cycle Apokatastasis. The next day, 23 December 178BC, the Winter Solstice started. During these two neighboring dates, the celebration of the religious festival of Isia started in Egypt and the Hellenistic Greece. After the analysis of the Mechanism's Parapegma events specific position, 22/23 December 178BC is an ideal, functional and representative initial date, in order to calibrate the initial position of the Mechanism's pointers.

2022-03-28T19:17:57Z 29 pages, 8 figures Almagest 2023, Vol. 14(1), p.4-39 Aristeidis Voulgaris Christophoros Mouratidis Andreas Vossinakis http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13932v1 2023-08-26T18:17:15Z

Weyl proposed a schema for symbolic construction of scientific representation starting from subjective immediate experience, and moving toward the objective ordered manifolds of possibilities due to "rational motives" of comprehending the world in "the 'truly objective', exact, non-qualitative" way. Weyl's purely infinitesimal geometry may be viewed as an application of the schema.Weyl himself as well as various researchers have discussed the introduction of a local coordinate system as an effort to bridge the chasm between the intuitive and the mathematical continuum for this schema. I argue that the introduction of a local coordinate system only explained the "exact, non-qualitative" aspect of the "rational motives", and there is also a problem of how the intersubjective constitution is possible. The latter was not explicitly explained by Weyl, and corresponds to the "truly objective" aspect of "rational motives". I argue that, a comprised intersubjective constitution could be achieved by a strategy of introducing an additional structure to starting points for theoretical constructions. The strategy might also provide an explanation for gauge invariance in Weyl's unified field theory.

2023-08-26T18:17:15Z 21 pages Dong Luo http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00975v1 2023-08-25T10:59:30Z

Taking Heisenberg's and Schrodinger's theories of quantum mechanics as his case study, De Regt's contextual theory of understanding argues that recognizing qualitatively characteristic consequences of a theory T without performing exact calculations is a criterion for scientific understanding. From the perspective of this theory of understanding, the task of understanding quantum mechanics seems to have been achieved already or even finished. This appears to disagree with some physicists' attitude to the understanding of quantum mechanics in line with Richard Feynman's famous slogan "I think I can safely say that nobody really understands quantum mechanics." Moreover, if the task of understanding quantum mechanics has been finished already, there would be a conflict between the contextual theory of understanding of quantum mechanics and interpretations of quantum mechanics.

2023-08-25T10:59:30Z 11 pages Technology and Language,2023 Dong Luo 10.48417/technolang.2023.01.03