https://arxiv.org/api/IWEFvB0OUcPxyg/Au9yWCVagiPM 2026-06-23T11:38:24Z 5624 1065 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12456v1 2023-09-21T19:55:50Z

The Astronomical Genealogy Project (AstroGen) has been underway since January 2013. This project of the Historical Astronomy Division (HAD) of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) has been online since July 2020, courtesy of the AAS. The volunteers of the AstroGen team have systematically searched online directories, mostly at individual university libraries, for astronomy-related doctoral theses equivalent to the modern, research-based Ph.D. We now claim to be 'nearly complete' for 38 countries, although some have not been updated for a year or two or three. The website contains a page for each astronomer and advisor, with links to the persons, universities, institutes, and the theses themselves. More than two-thirds of the theses are online in full, although some require access to a library with a subscription. There is information about nearly 37,000 individuals who have earned astronomy-related doctorates and another 5400 who have supervised them, but may not have earned such degrees themselves. Most of the latter have not yet been evaluated, but probably a majority earned doctorates in other fields, such as physics or geology. We present some of the results of our research and discuss ten ways the reader might make use of the project.

2023-09-21T19:55:50Z 10 pages, 10 figures, 7 tables Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage (2023) 26, 499-508 Joseph S. Tenn 10.3724/SP.J.1440-2807.2023.06.40 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10927v1 2023-09-19T20:57:49Z

The epistemic arrow of time is the fact that our knowledge of the past seems to be both of a different kind and more detailed than our knowledge of the future. Just like with the other arrows of time, it has often been speculated that the epistemic arrow arises due to the second law of thermodynamics. In this paper we investigate the epistemic arrow of time, using a fully formal framework. We begin by defining a memory system as any physical system whose present state can provide information about the state of the external world at some time other than the present. We then identify two types of memory systems in our universe, along with an important special case of the first type, which we distinguish as a third type of memory system. We show that two of these types of memory system are time-symmetric, able to provide knowledge about both the past and the future. However, the third type of memory systems exploits the second law of thermodynamics in all of its instances we find in our universe. The result is that in our universe, this type of memory system only ever provides information about the past. Finally, we argue that human memory is of this third type, completing the argument. Our analysis is indebted to prior work in Wolpert 1992, but expands and improves upon this work in several respects.

2023-09-19T20:57:49Z 24 pages David H. Wolpert Jens Kipper http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09382v1 2023-09-17T21:25:06Z

This study critically reevaluates the Harlow-Hayden (HH) solution to the black hole information paradox and its articulation in the firewall paradox. The exploration recognizes the HH solution as a revolutionary approach in black hole physics, steering away from traditional constraints to depict the event horizon as a computational rather than a physical barrier. The paper first maps the initial physical dilemma that instigated the HH journey, introducing Alice, an observer facing intricate computational challenges as she approaches the black hole. I then depict the evolution of the narrative, describing how Alice was facilitated with a quantum computer to surmount the computational challenges and further detailing the augmented complexities arising from the integration of the physical dynamics of the black hole. Yet, HH's research applies the AdS/CFT correspondence to explore the dynamic unitary transformation in solving the firewall paradox through decoding Hawking radiation. However, it identifies a contradiction; the eternal perspective of black holes from the AdS/CFT theory challenges the firewall paradox's foundation. Finally, I narrate a paradigm shift as HH reframes Alice's task within the realms of error-correcting codes, illustrating a remarkable transition from a physical problem in black hole physics to a computational predicament in computer science. The study revisits pivotal moments in understanding black hole physics ten years later through this reexamination.

2023-09-17T21:25:06Z Galina Weinstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08017v1 2023-09-14T20:25:02Z

The vanishing phase space generator of the full four-dimensional diffeomorphism-related symmetry group in the context of the Barbero-Immirzi-Holst Lagrangian is derived directly for the first time from Noether's second theorem. Its applicability in the construction of classical diffeomorphism invariants is reviewed.

2023-09-14T20:25:02Z 11 pages, invited contribution to "Recent Advances in Gravity: A Themed Issue in Honor of Prof. Jorge Pullin on His 60th Anniversary" Donald Salisbury http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06962v1 2023-09-13T13:56:58Z

In the late 1960s, a young physicist was sailing along the coast of California towards Berkeley, where he got a post-doc position in astronomy. But his real goal was not astronomy, at least not immediately. First, John Clauser eagerly wanted to test some predictions of quantum theory that were at odds with a then recent and mostly ignored result by an Irish physicist John Stewart Bell, working at the celebrated CERN near Geneva.

2023-09-13T13:56:58Z 3 pages Europhysics News, vol. 54, number 1, pp 20-23, 2023 Nicolas Gisin http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05565v1 2023-09-11T15:52:43Z

This special feature, dedicated to Michael J. Duff FRS on the occasion of his 70th birthday, concerns topics in 'Quantum gravity, branes and M-theory'. These three intertwining subjects have been central to Duff's work; indeed many of his contributions have come to define significant aspects of what we actually mean by these terms. From the discovery of Weyl anomalies to recognising superstrings in 10 dimensions as a special case of membranes in an 11-dimensional M-theory, Duff's insights have shaped major developments across these themes. So it is an apposite setting for such a celebration and we are delighted to be able to include in this collection contributions from many of the pioneers of quantum gravity, branes and M-theory. The breadth of these topics has placed little constraint on the multiplicity of ideas appearing in these pages, from astrophysical black holes to chaotic condensed matter. Again, this is fitting as Duff's scientific remit spans a remarkable diversity of motifs, from the fundamentals of M-theory to entanglement in quantum information.

2023-09-11T15:52:43Z Introduction to the Proceedings of the Royal Society A special feature "Quantum gravity, branes and M-theory", located at https://royalsocietypublishing.org/topic/special-collections/duff-quantum-gravity, dedicated to Michael J. Duff FRS on the occasion of his 70th birthday. 10 pages, 1 figure Proc.R.Soc.A 478: 20220166 (2022) L. Borsten A. Marrani C. N. Pope K. Stelle 10.1098/rspa.2022.0166 http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08491v4 2023-09-08T06:22:05Z

A recent paper by two of us and co-workers, based on an extended Wigner's friend scenario, demonstrated that certain empirical correlations predicted by quantum theory (QT) violate inequalities derived from a set of metaphysical assumptions we called "Local Friendliness" (LF). These assumptions are strictly weaker than those used for deriving Bell inequalities. Crucial to the theorem was the premise that a quantum system with reversible evolution could be an observer (colloquially, a "friend"). However, that paper was noncommittal on what would constitute an observer for the purpose of an experiment. Here, we present a new LF no-go theorem which takes seriously the idea that a system's having *thoughts* is a sufficient condition for it to be an observer. Our new derivation of the LF inequalities uses four metaphysical assumptions, three of which are thought-related, including one that is explicitly called "Friendliness". These four assumptions, in conjunction, allow one to derive LF inequalities for experiments involving the type of system that "Friendliness" refers to. In addition to these four metaphysical assumptions, this new no-go theorem requires two assumptions about what is *technologically* feasible: Human-Level Artificial Intelligence, and Universal Quantum Computing which is fast and large scale. The latter is often motivated by the belief that QT is universal, but this is *not* an assumption of the theorem. The intent of the new theorem is to give a clear goal for future experimentalists, and a clear motivation for trying to achieve that goal. We review various approaches to QT in light of our theorem. The popular stance that "quantum theory needs no interpretation" does not question any of our assumptions and so is ruled out. Finally, we quantitatively discuss how difficult the experiment we envisage would be, and briefly discuss milestones on the paths towards it.

2022-09-18T07:11:23Z 44 pages, 3 figures. Accepted for publication in <Q>uantum Quantum 7, 1112 (2023) Howard M. Wiseman Eric G. Cavalcanti Eleanor G. Rieffel 10.22331/q-2023-09-14-1112 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.04054v1 2023-09-08T00:59:28Z

According to \textit{effective realism}, scientific theories give us knowledge about the unobservable world, but not at the fundamental level. This view is justified by the well-received \textit{effective-field-theory} (EFT) approach to physics, according to which our best physical theories are only applicable up to a certain energy scale and expected to break down beyond that. In this paper, I explain the motivations for the EFT approach and effective realism and their benefits. I also raise new challenges for this approach. Applying effective realism to \textit{effective quantum gravity} (EQG) reveals its shortcomings: EQG does not give us a realistic theory of spacetime even within its scope of validity. It also exposes a general interpretative dilemma faced by all EFTs concerning their indispensable references to classical spacetime beyond their scope of validity.

2023-09-08T00:59:28Z Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Volume 95, October 2022, Pages 75-83 Lu Chen 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.07.004 http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03171v2 2023-09-07T21:59:34Z

Recently there have emerged an assortment of theorems relating to the 'absoluteness of emerged events,' and these results have sometimes been used to argue that quantum mechanics may involve some kind of metaphysically radical non-absoluteness, such as relationalism or perspectivalism. However, in our view a close examination of these theorems fails to convincingly support such possibilities. In this paper we argue that the Wigner's friend paradox, the theorem of Bong et al and the theorem of Lawrence et al are all best understood as demonstrating that if quantum mechanics is universal, and if certain auxiliary assumptions hold, then the world inevitably includes various forms of 'disaccord,' but this need not be interpreted in a metaphysically radical way; meanwhile, the theorem of Ormrod and Barrett is best understood either as an argument for an interpretation allowing multiple outcomes per observer, such as the Everett approach, or as a proof that quantum mechanics cannot be universal in the sense relevant for this theorem. We also argue that these theorems taken together suggest interesting possibilities for a different kind of relational approach in which dynamical states are relativized whilst observed events are absolute, and we show that although something like 'retrocausality' might be needed to make such an approach work, this would be a very special kind of retrocausality which would evade a number of common objections against retrocausality. We conclude that the non-absoluteness theorems may have a significant role to play in helping converge towards an acceptable solution to the measurement problem.

2023-09-06T17:13:31Z Corrected comments about whether Lawrence et al theorem requires a Locality assumption Emily Adlam http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15435v4 2023-09-07T07:06:17Z

An alternative approach towards quantum theory is described, and tentative attempts to connect his approach to special and general relativity are discussed. Important concepts are gauge groups and information/entropy connected to some physical systems. Some recent results on information in connection to black holes are touched upon, and it is indicated how expected information can be argued to be conserved. This argument only depends on what happens outside the black hole. Everything connected to the interior of the black hole is inaccessible.

2023-05-23T09:40:34Z Inge S. Helland http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03484v1 2023-09-07T05:22:24Z

Despite its apparent complexity, our world seems to be governed by simple laws of physics. This volume provides a philosophical introduction to such laws. I explain how they are connected to some of the central issues in philosophy, such as ontology, possibility, explanation, induction, counterfactuals, time, determinism, and fundamentality. I suggest that laws are fundamental facts that govern the world by constraining its physical possibilities. I examine three hallmarks of laws--simplicity, exactness, and objectivity--and discuss whether and how they may be associated with laws of physics.

2023-09-07T05:22:24Z 76 pages, 10 figures, monograph manuscript prepared for Cambridge Elements in Philosophy of Physics. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2109.09226 Eddy Keming Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16068v2 2023-09-06T16:21:12Z

Stephen Wolfram has recently outlined an unorthodox, multicomputational approach to fundamental theory, encompassing not only physics but also mathematics in a structure he calls The Ruliad, understood to be the entangled limit of all possible computations. In this framework, physical laws arise from the the sampling of the Ruliad by observers (including us). This naturally leads to several conceptual issues, such as what kind of object is the Ruliad? What is the nature of the observers carrying out the sampling, and how do they relate to the Ruliad itself? What is the precise nature of the sampling? This paper provides a philosophical examination of these questions, and other related foundational issues, including the identification of a limitation that must face any attempt to describe or model reality in such a way that the modeller-observers are included

2023-08-30T14:45:22Z Dean Rickles Hatem Elshatlawy Xerxes D. Arsiwalla http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02477v1 2023-09-05T14:31:17Z

Albert Einstein visited Spain only once, precisely one hundred years ago. The circumstances, of a very different kind, of this visit will be explained here. In special, some important events happened to Einstein during that period, which, eventually, were key for converting modern cosmology into a genuine physical theory. Among them is the famous Einstein-Friedmann controversy, first, on the mathematical validity of Friedmann's equations and, later, their possible usefulness as a reliable tool to describe the real world. A summary of the deepest ideas underlying Einstein's contributions to the theory of relativity, which he had already completed before his visit, will precede the discussion, also supplemented with a description, in very simple terms, of the three main relativistic theories, namely Galileo's one, and Einstein's special and general theory. They pave the way towards a definitive theory of total relativity, so far unattainable. It will be recalled that the most general relativity principle, faithfully reflecting Ernst Mach's far-reaching ideas, might have much to do with the symmetry-breaking paradigm, a most crucial tool in quantum field theory and high energy physics.

2023-09-05T14:31:17Z 30 pages, 16 figures Symmetry 2023, 15, 1470 Emilio Elizalde 10.3390/sym15071470 http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04943v2 2023-09-05T07:36:16Z

This expository paper relates the Hole Argument in general relativity (GR) to the well-known theorem of Choquet-Bruhat and Geroch (1969) on the existence and uniqueness of globally hyperbolic solutions to the Einstein field equations. Like the Earman-Norton (1987) version of the Hole Argument (which is originally due to Einstein), this theorem exposes the tension beween determinism and some version of spacetime substantivalism. But it seems less vulnerable to the campaign by Weatherall (2018) and followers to close the Hole Argument on the basis of ``mathematical practice'', since the theorem only talks about isometries and hence does not make the pointwise identifications via diffeomorphisms that Weatherall objects to. Among other implications of the theorem for the philosophy of GR, we reconsider Butterfield's (1987) influential definition of determinism. This should be amended if its goal is to express the idea that \GR\ is deterministic in the absence of Cauchy horizons, although its original form does capture the way GR is indeterministic in their presence! Furthermore, in GR isometries come out as gauge symmetries, as do Poincar'e transformations in special relativity. Finally, I discuss some implications of the theorem for the philosophy of science: accepting the determinism horn still requires a choice between Frege-style abstractionism and Hilbert-style structuralism; and, within the latter, between structural realism and empiricist structuralism (which I favour).

2022-06-10T08:34:05Z 25 pages, considerable revision Klaas Landsman http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01972v1 2023-09-05T05:56:58Z

I propose a theory of space with infinitesimal regions called \textit{smooth infinitesimal geometry} (SIG) based on certain algebraic objects (i.e., rings), which regiments a mode of reasoning heuristically used by geometricists and physicists (e.g., circle is composed of infinitely many straight lines). I argue that SIG has the following utilities. (1) It provides a simple metaphysics of vector fields and tangent space that are otherwise perplexing. A tangent space can be considered an infinitesimal region of space. (2) It generalizes a standard implementation of spacetime algebraicism (according to which physical fields exist fundamentally without an underlying manifold) called \textit{Einstein algebras}. (3) It solves the long-standing problem of interpreting \textit{smooth infinitesimal analysis} (SIA) realistically, an alternative foundation of spacetime theories to real analysis (Lawvere 1980). SIA is formulated in intuitionistic logic and is thought to have no classical reformulations (Hellman 2006). Against this, I argue that SIG is (part of) such a reformulation. But SIG has an unorthodox mereology, in which the principle of supplementation fails.

2023-09-05T05:56:58Z Journal of Philosophical Logic volume 51, pages 857-877 (2022) Lu Chen 10.1007/s10992-022-09653-9