https://arxiv.org/api/jtg4Xpj+eIkXhxl11NX3AVbYO3g2026-03-22T20:11:33Z553710515http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07932v1Bohmian mechanics: A legitimate hydrodynamic picture for quantum mechanics, and beyond2026-01-12T19:01:58ZSince its inception, Bohmian mechanics has been surrounded by a halo of controversy. Originally proposed to bypass the limitations imposed by von Neumann's theorem on the impossibility of hidden-variable models in quantum mechanics, it faced strong opposition from the outset. Over time, however, its use in tackling specific problems across various branches of physics has led to a gradual shift in attitude, turning the early resistance into a more moderate acceptance. A plausible explanation for this change may be that, since the late 1990s and early 2000s, Bohmian mechanics has been taking on a more operational and practical role. The original hidden-variable idea has gradually faded from its framework, giving way to a more pragmatic approach that treats it as a suitable analytical and computational tool. This discussion explores how and why such a shift in perspective has occurred and, therefore, answers questions such as whether Bohmian mechanics should be considered once and for all a legitimate quantum representation (i.e., worth being taught in elementary quantum mechanics courses) or, by extension, whether these ideas can be transferred to and benefit other fields. Here, the Schrödinger equation and several specific numerical examples are re-examined in the light of a less restrictive view than the standard one usually adopted in quantum mechanics.2026-01-12T19:01:58Z22 pages, 6 figures; based on the talk given at the Basil Hiley Memorial Symposium (UCL, June 30, 2025)A. S. Sanzhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07437v1Quantum model for black holes and clocks2026-01-12T11:26:06ZWe consider a stationary quantum system consisting of two non-interacting yet entangled subsystems, $Ξ$ and $Γ$. We identify a quantum theory characterizing $Ξ$ such that, in the quantum-to-classical crossover of the composite system, $Γ$ behaves as a test particle within the gravitational field of a Schwarzschild Black Hole (SBH) near its event horizon. We then show that this same quantum theory naturally provides a representation of $Ξ$ in terms of bosonic modes, whose features match those of the Hawking radiation; this facilitates the establishment of precise relations between the phenomenological parameters of the SBH and the microscopic details of the quantum model for $Ξ$. Finally, we recognize that the conditions used to characterize $Γ$ and $Ξ$ coincide with those required by the Page and Wootters mechanism for identifying an evolving system and an associated clock. This leads us to discuss how the quantum model for $Ξ$ endows the SBH with all the characteristics of a "perfect" clock.2026-01-12T11:26:06ZAlessandro CoppoNicola PranziniPaola Verrucchihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08753v2Heat as a gauge connection2026-01-11T19:33:18ZWe show that heat defines a gauge connection on a line bundle over work configurations. Vanishing curvature is equivalent to the local existence of entropy and temperature functions such that heat can be expressed as $TdS$. A conjecture of Jauch, that entropy and temperature arise from a conservation law, is shown to follow as a special case. Global equilibrium may nevertheless fail in the presence of a thermal analogue of geometric phase.2025-03-11T14:22:32Z5 pagesBryan W Robertshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06618v1Wave Function Realism and the Mathematization of Nature. A Phenomenological Perspective2026-01-10T16:50:06ZThis chapter reexamines wave function realism (WFR) through the lens of phenomenology. We begin by situating WFR within the broader debate about the ontology of the quantum state and the temptation to "read off" metaphysics from mathematical formalism. Against this background, we turn to the London-Bauer interpretation (LBI), the most explicit attempt to interpret quantum mechanics through phenomenological categories. On this view, the measurement transition is not a physical discontinuity but a reflective articulation of objectivity, and the wave function formally encodes the horizonal structure of world-givenness. We develop this idea by reconfiguring the notion of realism itself: not as objectivist, but as correlational and transcendental. The resulting picture suggests that quantum mechanics, rather than depicting a world "minus observers," mathematically articulates the very correlation through which a world becomes manifest at all.2026-01-10T16:50:06ZPhilipp BerghoferHarald A. Wiltschehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06592v1Matière noire et (ou) gravitation modifiée : une approche historique et épistémologique2026-01-10T15:03:37ZThe current standard model of cosmology assumes that the majority of matter in the Universe is made of dark matter, and that the latter is fundamentally different from ordinary matter. Dark matter can in principle explain the rotation of galaxies, the gravitational lensing from galaxy clusters or the appearance of the cosmic microwave background, the oldest light in the Universe. But does dark matter really exist? Here, we review the history of this concept and its implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies. We also consider the questions that remain, the limitations of the model, and present alternative theories, in particular modifications to the gravitional law that would -- perhaps -- make it possible to do without it.2026-01-10T15:03:37Z42 pages, in French. Chapter of the book "Connaitre le cosmos : enjeux philosophiques et scientifiques", editors Julien Bernard & Simon Beyne, Spartacus-Idh, collection Nouvelle Vision des Sciences, pp. 333-364, 2025. ISBN: 978-2-36693-146-4. http://spartacus-idh.com/fr/nouvelles-visions-des-sciences/146-146.htmlin "Connaitre le cosmos : enjeux philosophiques et scientifiques", editors Julien Bernard & Simon Beyne, Spartacus-Idh, 2025, pp.333-364Benoit FamaeyJonathan Freundlichhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22540v2Determinism and Indeterminism as Model Artefacts: Toward a Model-Invariant Ontology of Physics2026-01-10T06:47:50ZThis paper argues that the traditional opposition between determinism and indeterminism in physics is representational rather than ontological. Deterministic-stochastic dualities are available in principle, and arise in a non-contrived way in many scientifically important models. When dynamical systems admit mathematically equivalent deterministic and stochastic formulations, their observable predictions depend only on the induced structure of correlations between preparations and measurement outcomes. I use this model-equivalence to motivate a model-invariance criterion for ontological commitment, according to which only structural features that remain stable across empirically equivalent representations, and whose physical effects are invariant under such reformulations, are candidates for realism. This yields a fallibilist form of structural realism grounded in modal robustness rather than in the specifics of any given mathematical representation. Features such as conservation laws, symmetries, and causal or metric structure satisfy this criterion and can be encoded in observable relations in mathematically intelligible ways. By contrast, the localisation of modal selection -- whether in initial conditions, stochastic outcomes, or informational collapse mechanisms -- is not invariant under empirically equivalent reformulations and is therefore best understood as a gauge choice rather than an ontological feature. The resulting framework explains how certain long-standing problems in the foundations of physics, including the measurement problem and the perceived conflict between physical determinism and free agency, arise from the reification of representational artefacts. By distinguishing model-invariant structure from modelling conventions, I offer a realist ontology for modern physics that combines empirical openness with resistance to metaphysical overreach.2025-12-27T09:41:03Z32 pages. V2 missing references added, small clarifications in quantum foundations sectionDavid Nollandhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06346v1On Causality and Predictivity2026-01-09T22:55:42ZCertain approaches to quantum gravity, such as the one based on the concept of purely virtual particles (fakeons), sacrifice the cause-effect relation at very small scales to reconcile renormalizability with unitarity. Other developments have also urged caution regarding the idea of causality as a fundamental principle. In this paper, we examine the problem from multiple perspectives, including locality and predictivity, and extend the existing skepticism in several directions. Emphasizing the impact of unruly "disruptors", we point out that the illusory arrow of time associated with causality and predictivity is inherently statistical. This renders the cause-effect relation strained at the microscopic level. We also show that causation is a borderline concept that demands belief in entities which can act on nature without being part of it. Ultimately, not only is renouncing microcausality a reasonable price to pay for a consistent and predictive theory of quantum gravity (as is the one based on the fakeon idea), but the very notion of causality is misleading. Resting as it does on metaphysical assumptions, it should therefore be abandoned in fundamental physics.2026-01-09T22:55:42Z34 pages, 1 figureDamiano Anselmihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06312v1Looking for Work in Quantum Thermodynamics2026-01-09T21:02:13ZThis paper diagnoses a much-discussed problem in quantum thermodynamics, that of generalizing classical work into the quantum domain. I begin with the no-go theorem of Perarnau-Llobet et al (2017): no universal measurement scheme for quantum work satisfies two intuitive, classically consilient desiderata. I assess this incompatibility as stemming from the measurement problem. Decoherence restores compatibility for all practical purposes, but raises questions about what 'universality' should mean and whether any measurement scheme can be 'universal'. I consider a different standard of universality -- in terms of ontology -- by defining a trajectory-based notion of quantum work using the quantum potential. While this preserves the classical role of work as the integral of forces over distances, and evades the tension of the no-go theorem, consilience fails elsewhere; no single quantum work concept seems capable of preserving all classical features, raising questions for what it takes for successful generalization of the work concept to quantum thermodynamics.2026-01-09T21:02:13ZPreprint of Jan 10, 2026. Accepted at the British Journal for Philosophy of Science. Please cite published version when availableEugene Y. S. Chuahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04951v4What is emergence, after all?2026-01-09T11:41:05ZThe term emergence is increasingly used across scientific disciplines to describe phenomena that arise from interactions among a system's components but cannot be readily inferred by examining those components in isolation. While often invoked to explain higher-level behaviors, such as flocking, synchronization, or collective intelligence, the term is frequently used without precision, sometimes giving rise to ambiguity or even mystique. In this perspective paper, we clarify the scientific meaning of emergence as a measurable and physically grounded phenomenon. Through concrete examples, such as temperature, magnetism, and herd immunity in social networks, we review how collective behavior can arise from local interactions that are constrained by global boundaries. By refining the concept of emergence, we gain a clearer and more grounded understanding of complex systems. Our goal is to show that emergence, when properly framed, offers not mysticism but insight.2025-07-07T12:52:57Z9 pages, 3 figures, 163 referencesAbbas K. Rizi10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag010http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05337v1Remarkable Dates and Place: One Hundred Years Ago2026-01-08T19:33:11ZExactly a century ago, wave quantum mechanics was born in Arosa, Switzerland. Erwin Schrödinger was vacationing in this classic Swiss Alps town at Christmas 1925 when he made his breakthrough discovery of the wave equation \cite{SchrQMI}.2026-01-08T19:33:11Z10 pages, 5 figuresSergei K. Suslovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2504.16225v3Towards a Generalized Theory of Observers2026-01-07T10:29:28ZWe propose a formal framework for understanding and unifying the concept of observers across physics, computer science, philosophy, and related fields. Building on cybernetic feedback models, we introduce an operational definition of minimal observers, explore their role in shaping foundational concepts, and identify what remains unspecified in their absence. Drawing upon insights from quantum gravity, digital physics, second-order cybernetics, and recent ruliological and pregeometric approaches, we argue that observers serve as indispensable reference points for measurement, reference frames, and the emergence of meaning. We show how this formalism sheds new light on debates related to consciousness, quantum measurement, and computational boundaries; by way of theorems on observer equivalences and complexity measures. This perspective opens new avenues for investigating how complexity and structure arise in both natural and artificial systems.2025-04-22T19:35:55ZHatem ElshatlawyDean RicklesXerxes D. Arsiwallahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00515v2The Physics of Causation2026-01-06T00:32:05ZAssembly theory (AT) introduces a concept of causation as a material property, constitutive of a metrology of evolution and selection. The physical scale for causation is quantified with the assembly index, defined as the minimum number of steps necessary for a distinguishable object to exist, where steps are assembled recursively. Observing countable copies of high assembly index objects indicates that a mechanism to produce them is persistent, such that the object's environment builds a memory that traps causation within a contingent chain. Copy number and assembly index underlie the standardized metrology for detecting causation (assembly index), and evidence of contingency (copy number). Together, these allow the precise definition of a selective threshold in assembly space, understood as the set of all causal possibilities. This threshold demarcates life (and its derivative agential, intelligent and technological forms) as structures with persistent copies beyond the threshold. In introducing a fundamental concept of material causation to explain and measure life, AT represents a departure from prior theories of causation, such as interventional ones, which have so far proven incompatible with fundamental physics. We discuss how AT's concept of causation provides the foundation for a theory of physics where novelty, contingency and the potential for open-endedness are fundamental, and determinism is emergent along assembled lineages.2026-01-02T00:20:53Z58 pages, 7 Figures, 68 referencesLeroy CroninSara I. Walkerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00474v2Mathematics in the liturgical books of the Catholic Church: phases of the ecclesiastical moon2026-01-05T14:49:22ZWe use contemporary mathematical notation to describe the method for determining the age of the ecclesiastical moon as mandated by pope Gregory XIII and elaborated in the book of Christopher Clavius \emph{Romani calendarii explicatio}. The algorithm is first introduced by using the tabular method employed by liturgical books such as the Roman Missal, Breviary and Martyrology. Then we construct the recurrence equation for the epacts, derive its solution, and give a simple expression for the age of the moon on a given day of the year. We also consider the problems which can occur at the transition from December 31 to January 1 of the next year, when there could be a ``jump'' in moon's age ("saltus lunae") in years when epact corrections are applied. We propose a simple solution which fixes these problems. A summary of the formulae and listing of the implementation of relevant functions in Python is provided in the last section.2026-01-01T21:05:43Z18 pages, 7 figuresAntiquitates Mathematicae, 16:259--282, 2022Henryk Fukś10.14708/am.v16i1.7138http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01960v1Discrete symmetries in classical and quantum oscillators2026-01-05T10:04:39ZWe consider the nature of the wave function using the example of a harmonic oscillator. We show that the eigenfunctions $ψ_n{=}z^n$ of the quantum Hamiltonian in the complex Bargmann-Fock-Segal representation with $z\in\mathbb C$ are the coordinates of a classical oscillator with energy $E_n=\hbarωn$, $n=0,1,2,...\,$. They are defined on conical spaces ${\mathbb C}/{\mathbb Z}_n$ with cone angles $2π/n$, which are embedded as subspaces in the phase space $\mathbb C$ of the classical oscillator. Here ${\mathbb Z}_n$ is the finite cyclic group of rotations of the space $\mathbb C$ by an angle $2π/n$. The superposition $ψ=\sum_n c_nψ_n$ of the eigenfunctions $ψ_n$ arises only with incomplete knowledge of the initial data for solving the Schrödinger equation, when the conditions of invariance with respect to the discrete groups ${\mathbb Z}_n$ are not imposed and the general solution takes into account all possible initial data parametrized by the numbers $n\in\mathbb N$.2026-01-05T10:04:39Z12 pagesAlexander D. Popovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06034v2Tractatus Quanticum2026-01-04T15:19:23ZThis is a re-editing, which takes quantum mechanics into account, of Wittgenstein's famous Tractatus. The operation has a playful side in the form, but is a serious attempt to capture possible philosophical implications of the Relational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, and formalize the naturalistic third-way between realism and instrumentalism explored by this interpretation.2025-12-04T17:37:13Z16 pagesNiccolò CovoniCarlo Rovelli