https://arxiv.org/api/ZRmPh3k3ihjvwA/Bv3s8rdQkhO02026-06-23T07:23:48Z5624100515http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10871v1La Physique Théorique des Hautes Energies en France2023-11-17T21:17:15ZThe year 2023 marks three anniversaries: the 150th anniversary of the French Physical Society, the 100th anniversary since the publication of Louis de Broglie's articles (the first fundamental articles of Quantum Mechanics) and the 50th anniversary of the Standard Model, the theory which describes in a unified framework the strong, the electromagnetic and the weak interactions among elementary particles. This note is an attempt to present the situation of theoretical physics in France during these years and highlight the french contributions in this world effort. We shall see that, although these contributions have been important, french theorists rarely played the leading roles. At the end I will try to draw some conclusions from these findings.2023-11-17T21:17:15ZArticle written on the occasion of the French Physical Society 150th anniversary. 52 pages, in French languageJean Iliopouloshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09769v11953: Fermi's "little discovery" and the birth of the numerical experiment2023-11-16T10:49:31ZThe year 1953 is pivotal for computational physics: the first application of the Monte-Carlo method is published and calculations of the so-called Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou experiment are started. It is the beginning of the massive use in the physical sciences of numerical methods implemented on electronic computers and a decisive step in the development of modern nonlinear dynamics. This will lead to an unpredictable development during the following 70 years. We briefly review the unfolding of these events and present some recent results that show how the issues raised are still relevant today2023-11-16T10:49:31ZInvited article for Giornale di Fisica (English translation of the original Italian version)Giornale di Fisica, VOL. LXIV, N. 3 p.275 (2023)Stefano LepriRoberto LiviStefano Ruffo10.1393/gdf/i2023-10531-6http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08666v2Abnormal light propagation and the underdetermination of theory by evidence in astrophysics2023-11-14T23:00:25ZWe investigate the propagation of certain non-plane wave solutions to Maxwell's equations in both flat and curved spacetimes. We find that such solutions (or rather parts of them) exhibit accelerative behaviour, and in particular do not propagate on straight lines. Having established these results, we then turn to their conceptual significance -- which, in brief, we take to be the following: (i) one should not assume that the part of electromagnetic waves from outer space that is subject to detection is localised onto null trajectories; therefore (ii) astrophysicists and cosmologists should at least be wary about making such assumptions in their inferences from obtained data, for to do so may lead to incorrect inferences regarding the nature of our universe.2023-05-15T14:17:50Z18 pages, 4 figures, forthcoming in Annals of PhysicsFelipe A. AsenjoSergio A. HojmanNiels LinnemannJames Readhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17035v2Nomic realism, simplicity, and the simplicity bubble effect2023-11-14T19:38:52ZWe offer an argument against simplicity as a sole intrinsic criterion for nomic realism. The argument is based on the simplicity bubble effect. Underdetermination in quantum foundations illustrates the case.2023-10-25T22:23:02ZContributed talk for the Third Graduate Conference of the Italian Network for the Philosophy of Mathematics --- FilMat. Submitted: September 15, 2023. Approved: October 25, 2023Felipe S. AbrahãoRaoni Arroyohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08261v1Translation of Gulmanelli's seminar notes "On a theory of isotopic spin" (1954)2023-11-14T15:55:36ZAn integral translation of Paolo Gulmanelli's seminar notes "Su una teoria dello spin isotopico" (Casa Editrice, Milano, 1957) is presented. This is the only exposition that contains all elements of Pauli's attempt at a non-Abelian Kaluza-Klein theory in 1953.2023-11-14T15:55:36Z12 pagesA. E. S. Hartmannhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1503.08020v3The collaboration of Mileva Maric and Albert Einstein2023-11-14T02:19:01ZThis is a contemporary review of the involvement of Mileva Maric, Albert Einsteins first wife, in his theoretical work between the period of 1900 to 1905. Separate biographies are outlined for both Mileva and Einstein, prior to their attendance at the Swiss Federal Polytechnic in Zurich in 1896. Then, a combined journal is described, detailing significant events. In additional to a biographical sketch, comments by various authors are compared and contrasted concerning two narratives: firstly, the sequence of events that happened and the couples relationship at particular times. Secondly, the contents of letters from both Einstein and Mileva. Some interpretations of the usage of pronouns in those letters during 1899 and 1905 are re-examined, and a different hypothesis regarding the usage of those pronouns is introduced. Various papers are examined and the content of each subsequent paper is compared to the work that Mileva was performing. With a different take, this treatment further suggests that the couple continued to work together much longer than other authors have indicated. We also evaluate critics and supporters of the hypothesis that Mileva was involved in Einsteins work, and refocus this within a historical context, in terms of women in science in the late 19th century. Finally, the definition of, collaboration (co-authorship, specifically) is outlined. As a result, recommendations are stated, the first of which is that Mileva should be seriously considered as an honorary co-author of one, possibly two, papers, and secondly, of which it is recommended that a serious inquiry should be made, concerning the extent of Mileva Marićs involvement in Albert Einsteins published works between 1902 and 1905.2015-03-27T10:54:05Z34 pages, Asian Journal of Physics Vol 24, No 4 (2015) MarchEstelle Asmodellehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06904v1A Critical, But Hopefully Cordial, QBist Reply to Ballentine2023-11-12T17:44:59ZL. E. Ballentine's remarks in Physics Today about the QBist interpretation of quantum mechanics are generally wide of the mark.2023-11-12T17:44:59Z6 pages nearly exactlyBlake C. Staceyhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06583v2Contextuality, Coherences, and Quantum Cheshire Cats2023-11-11T04:50:24ZWe analyse the quantum Cheshire cat using contextuality theory, to see if this can tell us anything about how best to interpret this paradox. We show that this scenario can be analysed using the relation between three different measurements, which seem to result in a logical contradiction. We discuss how this contextual behaviour links to weak values, and coherences between prohibited states. Rather than showing a property of the particle is disembodied, the quantum Cheshire cat instead demonstrates the effects of these coherences, which are typically found in pre- and postselected systems.2023-07-13T06:53:27Z11 pages, 3 figures. Accepted in New J. Phys., matches accepted versionNew J. Phys. 25 113028 (2023)Jonte R. HanceMing JiHolger F. Hofmann10.1088/1367-2630/ad0bd4http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.15650v2Unpacking Black Hole Complementarity2023-11-10T05:12:42ZTo what extent does the black hole information paradox lead to violations of quantum mechanics? I explain how black hole complementarity provides a framework to articulate how quantum characterizations of black holes can remain consistent despite the information paradox. I point out that there are two ways to cash out the notion of consistency in play here: an operational notion and a descriptive notion. These two ways of thinking about consistency lead to (at least) two principles of black hole complementarity: an operational principle and a descriptive principle. Our background philosophy of science regarding realism/instrumentalism might initially lead us to prefer one principle over the other. However, the recent physics literature, which applies tools from quantum information theory and quantum computational complexity theory to various thought experiments involving quantum systems in or around black holes, implies that the operational principle is successful where the descriptive principle is not. This then lets us see that for operationalists the black hole information paradox might no longer be pressing.2022-10-28T21:13:29ZThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (2023, forthcoming)Siddharth Muthukrishnan10.1086/728047http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05570v1Cosmic-ray reactions in the atmosphere and in nuclear emulsions: Radiocarbon dating and disintegration stars2023-11-09T18:28:10ZCosmic rays were discovered by Victor Hess in 1912 through their effect on the conductivity of the atmosphere. It took several decades of research to understand their nature and composition. The photographic method of particle detection, developed and refined by Marietta Blau, played an important part in making visible cosmic-ray reactions in nuclear emulsions as disintegration stars in 1937. In the high atmosphere, cosmic-ray reactions produce not only charged particles, but also neutrons which lead to the formation of radiocarbon. The dating technique based on 14C was developed in 1946 by Willard Libby. The present work describes how members of the Institute for Radium Research in Vienna contributed to the discovery of cosmic rays, disintegration stars as well as the application of radiocarbon dating.2023-11-09T18:28:10Z13 pages, 10 figuresBrigitte Strohmaierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03335v3Local causality in the works of Einstein, Bohm and Bell2023-11-09T10:50:38ZIn this chapter we discuss the Einstein Podolsky Rosen theorem and its strong relation with Bell's theorem. The central role played by the concept of beable introduced by Bell is emphasized. In particular we stress that beables involved in EPR and Bell theorems are not limited to hidden supplementary variables (e.g., like in the de Broglie-Bohm (dBB) pilot-wave theory) but also include the wave function. In full agreement with Bell this allows us the reformulate the EPR and Bell results as strong theorems concerning nonlocality for quantum mechanics itself and not only for hidden-variables approaches as it is often mistakenly assumed. Furthermore, we clarify some repeated ambiguities concerning `local-realism' and emphasize that neither realism nor determinism nor counterfactual definiteness are prerequisites of EPR and Bell theorems.2023-05-05T07:29:20ZAccepted for publication in A. Oldofredi (Ed.), Guiding Waves in Quantum Mechanics: 100 Years of de Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory, Oxford University PressAurélien Drezethttp://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07599v2Reply to "Comment on `Weak values and the past of a quantum particle' ''2023-11-09T04:12:04ZWe here reply to a recent comment by Vaidman [\href{https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.048001}{Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 048001 (2023)}] on our paper [\href{https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023048}{Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023048 (2023)}]. In his Comment, Vaidman first admits that he is just defining (assuming) the weak trace gives the presence of a particle -- however, in this case, he should use a term other than presence, as this already has a separate, intuitive meaning other than ``where a weak trace is''. Despite this admission, Vaidman then goes on to argue for this definition by appeal to ideas around an objectively-existing idea of presence. We show these appeals rely on their own conclusion -- that there is always a matter of fact about the location of a quantum particle.2023-09-14T11:00:49Z2 pages, no figures, matches published versionPhys. Rev. Research 5, 048002 (2023)Jonte R HanceJohn RarityJames Ladyman10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.048002http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05057v1Electron liquids in solids: hydrodynamic description inspired by ideas of Radii Gurzhi2023-11-08T23:49:42ZThis is the preface article written for the special issue of Low Temperature Physics on the captivating topic of electron hydrodynamics dedicated to the pioneering work of Radii Gurzhi. The article features a brief synopsis of Gurzhi's seminal contributions that have played a pivotal role in shaping this continuously evolving area of condensed matter physics. This tribute is followed by a brief introduction to the collection of contributed papers published in the issue representing recent research in this dynamic field.2023-11-08T23:49:42ZPrepared for the special issue on electron hydrodynamics in the Low Temperature Physics [4 pages]Low Temp. Phys. 49, 1335-1337 (2023)A. N. KalinenkoA. Levchenko10.1063/10.0022359http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04612v1Was Einstein a Lone Genius?2023-11-08T11:18:40ZAlbert Einstein's journey to formulate the theory of general relativity involved significant shifts in his approach to gravitational field equations. Starting in 1912, he collaborated with Marcel Grossmann and initially explored broadly covariant field equations. However, in 1913, Einstein discarded these equations in favor of the non-covariant "Entwurf" field equations. This shift was a crucial step in his path to the final theory of general relativity, which he eventually achieved in 1915. This analysis explores Einstein's evolving ideas and decisions regarding the mathematical framework of his theory of gravity during the critical period 1912-1916. My findings in this paper highlight that Einstein's brilliance did not exist in isolation but thrived within a vibrant scientific discourse. His work was significantly enriched through contributions and discussions with friends and colleagues, notably Michele Besso and Marcel Grossmann, illustrating the collaborative essence of scientific advancement. Nevertheless, it is essential to recognize that while these individuals made substantial contributions, they did not share an equal role in shaping the fundamental framework of general relativity, which remained predominantly Einstein's intellectual creation. This nuanced perspective enhances our grasp of the pivotal role played by collaborative dynamics in the development of groundbreaking theories.2023-11-08T11:18:40ZGalina Weinsteinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04371v1How Charles Babbage invented the Computer2023-11-07T22:30:56ZThis paper provides an overview of the successive stages in the development of Charles Babbage's Analytical Engine, based on the blueprints held in the Babbage Papers Archive, accessible online through the Science Museum in London. The first person to decipher these schematics was Allan Bromley, whose contributions in the 1980s and 1990s significantly advanced our understanding of Babbage's pioneering work. The Science Museum's digitization of the Babbage Papers enables a chronological exploration of the evolution of Babbage's machines. The focus is on the Analytical Engine, shedding light on its lesser known but crucial transitional phases.2023-11-07T22:30:56Z18 pages, 15 figuresRaul Rojas