https://arxiv.org/api/y64/CrByWi0a9tctEnVg1nMqd3w 2026-11-12T03:35:31Z 5777 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.08753v3 2026-11-10T17:46:04Z

We show that thermodynamics can be viewed as a gauge theory. In particular, it is a principal R-bundle over a space of observable work configurations, with gauge transformations representing changes in the 'hidden' contributions to energy not captured by work. Heat defines a connection, and its curvature measures deviation from local equilibrium. Summed negative curvature on a disc is shown to give an expression of the Clausius inequality on the oriented loop bounding that disc. This allows one to derive a geometric expression of the Second Law. The framework further allows one to exhibit a thermal analogue of the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Instead of producing geometric phase shifts, this effect produces geometric entropy shifts.

2025-03-11T14:22:32Z 11 pages Bryan W Roberts http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14388v1 2026-11-10T17:40:26Z

The fragmentation regions of soft hadronic collisions approach energy-independent limits. Benecke, Chou, Yang, and Yen stated this hypothesis of limiting fragmentation in 1969. Feynman gave it a parton-model formulation the same year. Measurements from the CERN Intersecting Storage Rings (ISR) to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) still show this approach. Fischer and co-workers interpret the NA49 spectra from the CERN Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) as the sum of a target and a projectile component, each the decay of an excited hadronic system. This review traces the theory behind that two-component picture. It examines the hypothesis that the hadronic tools that predate quantum chromodynamics (QCD) suffice for the soft, non-perturbative domain of QCD. Regge exchange organizes the fragmentation region in triple-Regge form. It supplies the diffractive mass law of the excited systems, with the shrinkage of the Pomeron in its transfer dependence. Finite-energy sum rules and the two-component duality of Harari and Freund equate averaged towers of resonances with that exchange. Duality therefore motivates describing the excited systems in hadronic degrees of freedom. The review follows the cascade description through its predecessors, namely the fireballs of Niu, the novas of Jacob and Slansky, the clusters of Hwa, Good-Walker diffraction, and the two-stage dissociation of Hama. HEART (Hadronic Excitations And Resonance Transitions) assembles these pieces into an event-level cascade of two-body hadronic transitions. A companion paper (arXiv:2611.11570) defines it and tests it against the NA49 data. The review closes with the fragmentation-region measurements that would separate a resonance cascade from a string, namely the isospin of forward baryons, the local balance of strangeness in associated production, and forward resonance signals with their mass tails.

2026-11-10T17:40:26Z 24 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Companion paper (HEART model): arXiv:2611.11570 Ondrej Chvala http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10775v2 2026-11-10T16:51:32Z

In this paper we analyse scalar-tensor theories-specific instances of which include mainstream inflation and dark energy models-in light of the spacetime-matter dichotomy. We argue that it is difficult to categorise the scalar fields as either a pure aspect of the spacetime structure or a pure form of matter, by focusing on the Jordan vs Einstein frames of these theories. We present and evaluate various interpretational options available, concluding that the spacetime-matter dichotomy becomes untenable in this context. At the same time, the ontological and conceptual category of spacetime can be decoupled from that of gravity, with the latter remaining viable in the context of scalar-tensor theories.

2025-12-11T16:11:47Z Antonio Ferreiro Alex Fleuren Niels C. M. Martens 10.31389/pop.341 http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00981v2 2026-11-10T10:56:57Z

In 2014, with D. Aerts we proposed a solution to the hard problem of Bertrand's paradox by means of a universal average over different ways of randomizing an entity. In his recent monograph, N. Shackel raises objections concerning the approximation by cellular densities, the restrictions used in their construction, the apparently trivial limit of their averages, the choice of a second-order probability law, and the dependence of the result on the naming of chords. We revisit these objections using the invariance-based formulation of the universal average. The first objection is well taken, and the approximation argument is repaired: an explicit sequence of bivalent cellular densities provides weak approximation of any prescribed probability measure, with an error bound for intervals. We show that any second-order selection law invariant under rearrangements of equal-length cells has the same uniform barycenter, independently of the particular densities and weights employed. For cellular densities, this conclusion holds exactly at every finite resolution. Thus, non-uniqueness of the second-order law does not prevent uniqueness of the average it produces, which is what entitles one to speak of 'the' universal average at all. Finally, we prove that no probability measure can be invariant under both these rearrangements and arbitrary changes of interval lengths. The reference geometry therefore cannot be obtained by averaging alone: it must be supplied by the physical modelization of the randomized entity. These results clarify the scope, and the limitations, of our original distinction between the easy and hard problems of Bertrand's paradox.

2026-10-31T14:22:43Z 10 pages Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09558v4 2026-11-08T19:26:21Z

When does a decohering quantum system become classical? Generalised noncontextuality gives one criterion, for scenarios rich enough in preparations: a system is classical once its statistics admit an underlying model in which operationally indistinguishable procedures are physically identical. Where it crosses depends not on the state and channel alone but on which preparations, transformations and measurements the experiment offers, and if every measurement is allowed there is no crossing. For any pairwise unbiased bases in any dimension, given preparations holding their eigenstates and surrounding the maximally mixed state, the question reduces to a finite linear program; for a qudit of odd prime dimension $d$ restricted to the stabiliser subtheory, with one depolarised magic state, we solve it in closed form. With preparations and measurements alone the qutrit strange state is classical at zero noise; with the Clifford gates added, each channel represented once, it crosses at 3/5; and with a random gate represented, as Spekkens' treatment asks, by the matching mixture of stochastic maps, at 3/4. A Clifford orbit of assignments supports such a representation only if it has $d^2$ members, leaving, in every odd prime dimension, only Gross's discrete Wigner function: the crossing sits where it stops being negative.

2026-05-10T14:18:53Z 24+11 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. A, matches accepted version Enrico Bozzetto Jonte R. Hance 10.1103/ng5j-lw7n http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06641v2 2026-11-08T16:35:31Z

``Emergence'' refers to the fact that different mathematical languages and theories seem to be required to describe scientific theories that operate at different spatial and temporal scales. Highly circumscribed, special cases of emergence have been investigated using many different formal tools, including coarse-graining (over space and / or time), renormalization, dimension reduction, broken symmetry, and various formulations of causality. Here we extend the mathematics of model theory to unify and extend these earlier investigations. As a preliminary application of our framework, we investigate canonical examples of emergence, including the emergence of genetics from chemistry, of psychology from neurobiology, and of different forms of collective behavior from the laws governing their constituent parts. By exploiting the power of model theory we also uncover many aspects of emergence that were previously obscured. In particular, we uncover some of the rich hierarchical structure that relates different scientific fields. For example, we show that scientific fields can be related via a collection of multiple partial orders, all defined over the same set. On the other hand, under an alternative relation among scientific fields, one which allows cycles, we show that it is possible that the set of all of scientific fields must collapse into a single scientific field. Going forward, these investigations point to the formal tools that might need to be developed in order to arrive at a deeper understanding of this emergent hierarchy of scientific reality.

2026-11-04T15:20:35Z 52 pages, 44 pages main text, 3 figures David H. Wolpert David C. Krakauer http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.11323v1 2026-11-08T11:58:15Z

Stanley Deser was Ancell Professor Emeritus at Brandeis University and Visiting Professor at the California Institute of Technology. He was a world-renowned theoretical physicist whose accomplishments include the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner (ADM) formulation of general relativity, supergravity with Zumino, the dynamics of flat space with Jackiw and 't Hooft and many other contributions to the quantum theory of gravity. In the 1980s he was instrumental in securing National Science Foundation approval of the LIGO gravitational wave experiment against much opposition. He was awarded the Einstein Medal in 2015 for important contributions to general relativity, in particular the development of the ADM formalism. Other awards include: The Dannie Heineman Prize 1994; Fellow of the National Academy of Sciences 1994; Honorary Member of the Torino Academy of Sciences 2001; Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 1979, Fellow of the American Institute of Physics.

2026-11-08T11:58:15Z To appear in Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society M. J. Duff K. S. Stelle 10.1098/rsbm20025.0047 http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09826v2 2026-11-07T12:45:12Z

In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen (EPR) published a thought experiment that is entirely correct, has been demonstrated in real experiments, and is now the most famous in quantum physics. Their pioneering work described, for the first time, quantum correlations and can be regarded as a very early glimpse into today's `deep' quantum technologies, by which I mean those that enhance functionality by making use of quantum correlations. However, their work also produces a paradox that Erwin Schrödinger had already recognised as such in 1935 and which has since been cemented by the so-called Bell experiments. Here, I can now pinpoint the cause of the paradox in the EPR line of reasoning. It boils down to a single assumption by EPR, which I prove to be false. I show that this resolves the paradox.

2026-04-10T18:57:32Z The text in blue highlights changes from the first version Roman Schnabel http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12926v3 2026-11-05T21:56:30Z

The 1974 papers by Ostriker et al. (1974) and Einasto et al. (1974) are regarded as pivotal in establishing the evidential case for dark matter, although both relied on already existing observational data. By what means did they transform known observational anomalies into evidential support for dark matter? I argue that this transformation arose through evidential reconfiguration: extended galactic halos supplied a physical connection between galaxy rotation curves and cluster mass discrepancies, expanding the context of assessment so that results previously investigated locally could constrain one another. The significance of this connection was assessed against differing cosmological commitments and unresolved local dynamical assumptions, which help explain both the emphases of the two papers and their reception. To explicate its contribution to confirmation, I draw on Myrvold's Bayesian account of unification and use a toy model in which taking one result into account changes the assessment of a shared halo parameter, thereby altering expectations about the other. Comparison with an uncoupled model makes the resulting support explicit, while variations of the model show why a shared parameter alone is insufficient: the contribution depends on the connecting assumptions and what competing models predict. The novelty relevant to the old-evidence problem thus lies in what familiar observations became jointly capable of supporting. This reconstruction assesses that support once the connection is specified, while leaving a full account of historical belief change open.

2025-12-15T02:24:10Z Simon Allzén http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22042v2 2026-11-05T13:59:26Z

It has recently been claimed that algebraic methods can be used to give a background-independent description of semiclassical gravity. This paper aims to provide an entry point into recent algebraic approaches to quantum gravity and to analyse and critically assess the conception of background-independence here involved. We discuss an algebraic framework for formulating an algebra of observables along the worldline of an observer in a cosmological setting. By 'gravitationally dressing' the observables to the observer's worldline, the reference to the spacetime background can be set aside at the level of the abstract *-algebra. Thus this *-algebra is taken to be independent of any particular spacetime realisation, with different states on the algebra corresponding to different backgrounds. We compare this algebraic framework to three influential notions of background-independence in the literature and argue that none of these fully captures the sense in which the *-algebra is taken to be background-independent. Building on this, we extract a novel notion of algebraic background-independence tied to the representation-independence of the *-algebra. This algebraic conception motivates two further concepts of background-independence tailored to semiclassical theories: semiclassical background-independence and perturbative background-independence. We suggest that these provide useful tools for evaluating the scope and limitations of semiclassical approaches to quantum gravity.

2026-10-15T15:14:18Z 44 pages, v2: references added European Journal for Philosophy of Science 16, 96 (2026) Luka Vinck Sebastian De Haro 10.1007/s13194-026-00799-w http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07179v1 2026-11-04T22:05:18Z

Scientific representations often combine accurate and inaccurate components, which a single bivalent classification does not distinguish. This paper develops a restricted formal framework for estimating partial factual truth. For fixed content and valuation criteria, the target is adequacy to the facts, independent of the available evidence; its numerical assessment through evidence remains fallible. Quantitative claims are evaluated by normalized discrepancies between asserted and empirically supported values. Admissible finite conjunctions are assessed over a fixed basis of distinct elementary claims using arithmetic or relevance-weighted means. The resulting valuations preserve the contributions from accurate components and are independent of grouping when component counts or total weights are retained. Zero-relevance additions leave the contextual valuation unchanged, but compensation remains possible among components with positive relevance. Worked examples examine admissibility, changes of granularity, measurement indeterminacy, and sensitivity of comparisons to discrepancy scales and relevance weights. An astrophysical application connects the assessment to published observations. The framework applies to selected testable consequences of models and theories, without providing a numerical calculus for arbitrary formulas or a unique method for choosing scales and weights. It permits conditional comparisons of factual adequacy while distinguishing them from confidence, empirical coverage, and convergence toward a complete truth.

2026-11-04T22:05:18Z Published in Philosophies 2026, 11(5), 194 Gustavo E. Romero 10.3390/philosophies11050194 http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07143v1 2026-11-04T21:15:12Z

Ettore Majorana is undoubtedly one of the most important figures in 20th-century Italian science. His contributions to nuclear physics and Quantum Mechanics (QM) included innovative ideas, and the search for Majorana-type neutrinos remains an ongoing experimental research question. However, very little is known about his perspective on the significance of the quantum state, the philosophical implications of the then-new mechanics, and the relationship between QM and other sciences. This chapter aims to address this gap. In more detail, here I present the standard interpretation of Majorana's view on the quantum state, according to which the Italian physicist anticipated the physical content of Feynman's path-integral formulation of quantum theory. In what follows, I critically examine this position and propose an alternative understanding of Majorana's beliefs on the nature of the quantum state and the wave function. Finally, I briefly discuss his reflections concerning the major conceptual revolutions introduced by QM, notably, in his view, the impossibility of extending the objectivity and determinism of classical mechanics to the quantum realm, and their consequences for the relation between physics and the social sciences, disciplines that Majorana deeply studied before his disappearance.

2026-11-04T21:15:12Z Accepted for publication in the volume "Quantum Dilemmas: Philosophical Issues in Quantum Theory after One Century", Arroyo, R. and Morganti, M. (eds.), Springer. 17 pages Andrea Oldofredi http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05453v1 2026-11-03T18:38:58Z

The discovery of the top quark in 1995 completed the roster of the matter particles, quarks and leptons, expected in the Standard Model and in many of its suggested extensions. However, the top quark does not conform to the pattern set by its sister quarks and has come to be a critical component of the ongoing searches for physics beyond the prevailing paradigm. (Prepared for the Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics, CERN, Nov. 2025.)

2026-11-03T18:38:58Z 15 pages, 4 figures, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics, CERN, November 2025 Paul D. Grannis http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09989v1 2026-11-02T19:24:06Z

We examine whether the variables required for a future macroscopic description of a given physical system can themselves be stated in advance. Representing macroscopic descriptions as coarse-grainings of a fixed microscopic phase space, we distinguish formal prestatability, concerning the existence of an effective complete vocabulary of admissible macroscopic distinctions, from dynamical prestatability, concerning whether the future relevance of those distinctions is decidable. Both obstructions disappear for finite microscopic state spaces. In the infinite limit, exhaustive formal prestatability can fail, while a restricted predictive architecture may remain formally pre-statable. We construct such an architecture and show that, under universal dynamics, the future relevance of a candidate variable is equivalent to the halting problem. Thus a fixed microscopic phase space can support macroscopic descriptions whose future variables are not fully pre-statable.

2026-11-02T19:24:06Z Andrea Palessandro http://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03315v1 2026-11-02T15:41:53Z

The searches for the Higgs boson at LEP and the Tevatron between 1980 and 2000 are set in the context of the underlying theory of spontaneous symmetry breaking and early phenomenological studies. The evolution of direct searches at LEP and the Tevatron are reviewed, as well as indirect constraints from precision electroweak data. Finally, the state of play in 2000 is summarised, together with the perspectives it offered for later searches.

2026-11-02T15:41:53Z 20 pages, 12 figures, Contribution to the 4th International Symposium on the History of Particle Physics covering the period between 1980 and 2000, held at CERN in November 2025 John Ellis