https://arxiv.org/api/y64/CrByWi0a9tctEnVg1nMqd3w 2026-09-10T17:23:54Z 5718 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19142v4 2026-09-09T16:37:42Z

Quantum mechanics is widely recognised as being incomplete. It is not consistent with the second law of thermodynamics and does not provide a scientifically credible physical account of the measurement process, the means by which coherence is broken and classically observable states are recorded. This has led to many ad hoc assumptions being used to account for various properties of quantum systems, among which is the coherence time of quantum devices that determines their ability to perform computations. Here, we show that all these properties can be accommodated naturally and consistently in the context of mixing quantum systems which exhibit continuous spectra, as arises in the thermodynamic limit in quantum statistical mechanics and quantum gravity. In particular, for isolated systems we show that the time-reversal symmetry associated with unitary time evolution of the quantum state gives rise to time-symmetry breaking and a semi-group evolution which attains thermodynamic equilibrium at long times. Moreover, the emergence of this non-unitary time-asymmetry leads to microcanonical equilibrium states in which all quantum coherence is lost and is accompanied by the transformation of pure states into mixtures, leading in turn to an increase in entropy. Inclusion of a macroscopic measurement apparatus shows how the outcome of a measurement corresponds to the von Neumann projection postulate, arising with probabilities in conformance with the Born rule. The mathematical structure of the theory which applies to quantum systems with continuous spectra is closely analogous to the classical ergodic theory of dynamical systems and the conditions under which they attain equilibrium states.

2026-07-21T14:35:12Z Christopher J. N. Coveney Peter V. Coveney http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14319v4 2026-09-09T11:28:41Z

In the literature, there are two differing definitions of contextuality: Kochen and Specker's, and Spekkens' (or ``generalised''). However, researchers using one of these definitions rarely consider the other, meaning comparative analysis of these two notions is rare. In this paper, we advance the idea that Kochen-Specker contextuality provides a generalisation of the idea of system being fundamentally \emph{nonclassical}, while Spekkens' noncontextuality provides a generalisation of the idea of a system being \emph{classical}. This allows us to reconcile the two approaches, as different stages in a hierarchy of classicality/nonclassicality.

2026-04-15T18:22:06Z 16+13 pages, 2+1 figures. v2. Fig 1a fixed, added brief discussion of related results for (un)steerability Enrico Bozzetto Jonte R. Hance http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09927v1 2026-09-09T09:17:18Z

Manchak and Weatherall (2018) formulate the black hole information paradox as a failure of predictability in black hole evaporation spacetimes, diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I offer a strategy for resolving this paradox. I argue that failures of predictability in black hole evaporation are not well diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I then consider two weakenings of global hyperbolicity: prediction and retrodiction friendliness, the failure of which could ground a new paradox. However, deidealized black hole evaporation models can be prediction and retrodiction friendly. Therefore, the information paradox cannot be based upon failures of global hyperbolicity, nor either retrodiction or prediction unfriendliness.

2026-09-09T09:17:18Z 25 pages, 8 figures. Forthcoming in Philosophy of Science Dominic John Ryder http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21405v2 2026-09-09T06:42:43Z

Recent results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) have suggested that dark energy, long considered to be a cosmological constant, may actually be \lq{}dynamical\rq{}. To clarify what follows from these results, we distinguish three claims: (D1) the data disfavour the \LCDM expansion history; (D2) within the phenomenological Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) parametrisation, the data prefer $(w_0,w_a)\neq(-1,0)$; and (D3) there exist one or more genuine dynamical dark-energy degrees of freedom in the matter-sector, within GR and coupled to the standard sectors only gravitationally, whose dynamics account for the departure from the \LCDM expansion history. We demonstrate that DESI establishes D2, which supports D1, but does not establish D3. The \lq{}designer\rq{} construction in $f(R)$ gravity provides a gravitational realisation of the same background history, so that no observable determined solely by that history can discriminate, even in principle, between its \lq{}matter\rq{} and \lq{}gravitational\rq{} readings. Furthermore, non-minimally coupled models admit regular effective phantom-crossing realisations of the relevant phenomenology, while the selected crossing places additional pressure on a single-component, minimally coupled realisation of the matter-sector reading. We characterise the resulting underdetermination between matter and gravitational interpretations---exact at the level of background history, but breakable beyond it---and draw the corresponding norm for survey reporting.

2026-08-08T09:36:50Z Nicola Bamonti http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09726v1 2026-09-09T05:07:50Z

Previous published analyses of trinitite to determine the yield of the Trinity nuclear explosion used various estimates of the fraction of fission products that became incorporated in trinitite. Furthermore, these studies utilized nuclear data that has subsequently been revised. Utilizing a planar germanium detector, we observed gamma rays produced by the decays of both 137Cs and 239Pu from four samples of trinitite. From the observed 137Cs/239Pu ratios of and a simple analysis method based on current nuclear data and weapons debris studies, we find an average yield of 9.1+-4.5 kilotons from our four samples. While this result is substantially lower than the established total yield of 21 kilotons, it is in reasonable agreement that attributable to fissions in the 239Pu core alone.

2026-09-09T05:07:50Z Applied Radiation and Isotopes 238 (2026) 112883 Eric B. Norman Keenan J. Thomas Pedro V. Guillaumon http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09901v2 2026-09-08T08:41:20Z

Quantum computational advantage was claimed for the first time in 2019 and several experiments since then have reinforced and strengthened the claim. At the same time, a new generation of quantum computing devices with 100 logical qubits is being built. This raises two questions: Has quantum advantage actually been achieved? And what should our next milestones be for the upcoming 100-logical-qubit era? In this perspective, I argue that, in fact, quantum advantage has been achieved. The status today is analogous to Bell-inequality violations in the 1980s where some loopholes remain open, specifically, scalability and verifiability. I then outline three milestones for the 100-logical-qubit era aiming to close those loopholes: demonstrate fault-tolerant quantum advantage, perform efficiently verifiable advantage using random circuits with symmetries, and eventually demonstrate classically verifiable advantage with applications to certified randomness. These milestones are also natural stepping stones towards running algorithms with cryptographic applications.

2026-03-10T16:55:03Z This is a copyedited version of the original three-part mini series that was published on the Caltech Quantum Frontiers blog. v2: extended introduction, and fixed the definition of finite-fidelity RCS due to a silly counterexample Dominik Hangleiter http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09228v1 2026-09-07T11:47:06Z

The quantum model of the two-sentence liar paradox proposed by Aerts, Broekaert, and Smets is an early example of the use of quantum formalism to describe cognitive dynamics. Our reconstruction is primarily pedagogical in intent, but it also leads to a number of clarifications, and to some new observations, concerning the structure of the model. Rewriting the model in Dirac notation, we make explicit the distinction between truth values originating from a decision and from semantic inference, and show that the associated enlargement of the one-sentence state space corresponds to a factorization with respect to which the non-paradoxical configurations are separable while the genuine liar state is entangled. We also derive the Hamiltonian generating the four-state cyclic evolution, express it in compact operator form, and give the resulting transition probabilities in closed form. We emphasize that the liar cycle admits a unitarily equivalent representation in the four-dimensional truth-only space, where the unmeasured liar state is separable, so the dimensional enlargement is not required by the unitary part of the dynamics; it is required, however, by the measurement structure. The enlargement is also required by the dynamics as soon as revision processes are admitted, in which states with identical truth content but different origins have different successors, the origin degree of freedom then acting as a minimal form of cognitive memory. We conclude by discussing the possible relationship between the model and more general deliberative processes.

2026-09-07T11:47:06Z 17 pages Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06268v1 2026-09-05T21:28:42Z

Appeals to typicality are common in physics, but it is often unclear what it means for a physical state to be typical relative to a probability measure, and correspondingly unclear what a law that appeals to typicality asserts. Here we consider how one might characterize physical typicality using ideas from the theory of algorithmic randomness. As a concrete example, we show how taking a physical state to be typical relative to a computable measure when it is Martin-Löf random allows one to formulate the distribution postulate in Bohmian mechanics as a statistical constraining law of the theory. Using a toy model, we show how this constraint guarantees the standard Born statistics for computable experimental protocols. Algorithmic Bohmian mechanics (aBM) thus illustrates how algorithmic randomness may be used to provide precise content to a statistical law.

2026-09-05T21:28:42Z Accepted version, forthcoming in The Proceedings of The 2026 Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association Jeffrey A. Barrett Eddy Keming Chen Josiah Lopez-Wild http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06130v1 2026-09-05T14:54:48Z

I recently showed how objective Everettian probability can be defined over the records borne by an observer's later continuations, without unique actualization or additional premeasurement subjects \citep{Baxter2026}. Here I extend that model to all decoherent physical record states, including records that support no such continuation. The observer-indexed model is then a restriction of an exhaustive physical-record model.

2026-09-05T14:54:48Z 5 pages. Companion note to arXiv:2608.22733 Jonathan Baxter http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05809v1 2026-09-05T01:55:09Z

The attribution of the condition div A + (1/c^2) dPhi/dt = 0 has been under discussion since 1938 as a question of priority between Ludvig Lorenz and Hendrik Lorentz. This work argues that the problem is of a different nature, and that the discussion does not close because it has never been specified what is being attributed. Drawing on the three versions of the 1867 paper and on six further primary sources, it is documented that three separable acts have been designated under a single name: the obtaining of the relation between potentials, its imposition as a restriction on the admissible potentials, and its denomination as a gauge. It is further documented that in none of the three versions of the 1867 paper does the word potential appear, that the magnetic field does not figure in it as a quantity of the theory, and that the vocabulary in which that paper is described today enters the literature after it was written. It is concluded that the disjunction between the two denominations, posed without specifying which of the three acts is being attributed, is ill formed.

2026-09-05T01:55:09Z 13 pages. Also available at OSF: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/2WYG8 María Florentina Mendoza Urán http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22733v4 2026-09-05T01:06:36Z

Everettian quantum mechanics is often said to lack coherent probability because every possible measurement result occurs. If all of them exist globally, what is probability supposed to be a probability of? This paper defends an axiomatic answer: normalized Born measure is postulated as objective probability over the records borne by an observer's future continuations. A collapse law assigns the same probabilities to possible global outcomes. Neither theory derives the probabilities from its ontology. I relate this minimal proposal to earlier axiomatic accounts, separate it from their accompanying theories of personal persistence, and defend it against recent arguments that the axiomatic route cannot succeed. At the level of recorded results, the Everettian law supports the same predictions and empirical inferences as the collapse law, despite the theories' different ontologies.

2026-08-24T02:42:40Z 14 pages. Clarified prospective uncertainty, made the centered-likelihood principle explicit, and strengthened the response to objections concerning emergent records Jonathan Baxter http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04985v1 2026-09-04T10:41:09Z

This work examines the physical and conceptual evolution of the light quantum from Planck's blackbody theory to the theoretical and experimental developments that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field. The present study shows that the decisive transition occurred in Einstein's quantum theory of radiation (1916-1917). Absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous emission were formulated as elementary probabilistic mechanisms whose statistical balance alone reproduces the blackbody spectrum. In particular, spontaneous emission requires the emission of a light quantum, thereby implicitly proving its physical necessity before its theoretical status was clarified. At the same time, the already existing term photon began to acquire a stable usage following Lewis's 1926 proposal and became increasingly associated with Einstein's light quantum. By the mid-1920s, the central problem had shifted from whether light quanta were physically required to how radiation could be incorporated into the emerging quantum-mechanical formalism. This transition marks a key stage, illustrating how initial debates about the existence of light quanta gave way to their integration into a comprehensive theoretical structure. The resulting asymmetry between the novel quantum description of matter and the still-classical description of radiation, called into question by the phenomenon of spontaneous emission, identifies the physical problem that led to the quantization of the electromagnetic field.

2026-09-04T10:41:09Z Aaron Collavini Valentina Bologna Francesco Longo Stefano Ansoldi Fulvio Parmigiani http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24054v3 2026-09-04T04:23:59Z

We introduce a framework uniting algorithmic randomness with exchangeable credences to address foundational questions in philosophy of probability and philosophy of science. To demonstrate its power, we show how one might use the framework to derive the Principal Principle -- the norm that rational credence should match known objective chance -- without circularity. The derivation brings together de Finetti's exchangeability, Martin-Löf randomness, Lewis's and Skyrms's chance-credence norms, and statistical constraining laws (arXiv:2303.01411). Laws that constrain histories to algorithmically random sequences naturally pair with exchangeable credences encoding inductive symmetries. Using the de Finetti representation theorem, we show that this pairing directly entails the Principal Principle of this framework. We extend the proof to partial exchangeability and provide finite-history bounds that vanish in the infinite limit. The Principal Principle thus emerges as a mathematical consequence of the alignment between nomological constraints and inductive learning. This reveals how algorithmic randomness and exchangeability can illuminate foundational questions about chance, frequency, and rational belief.

2025-10-28T04:26:19Z Accepted version, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 22 pages. (Compared to v2, footnote 9 is expanded to clarify a relation between computable measures and limiting relative frequencies.) Jeffrey A. Barrett Eddy Keming Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04297v1 2026-09-03T15:50:40Z

Our main claim is that Bohr adopted a principle-theoretic approach to quantum mechanics in order to reconcile two principles: the distinction principle, which asserts the necessity of a clear epistemic distinction between a classical apparatus and a quantum system, and the non-separability principle, which asserts that the two systems are ontologically non-separable in any measurement process. The latter principle is a consequence of Bohr's argument that, during a measurement interaction, the quantum system and the measurement apparatus form a 'new kind of individuality'. To support our argument, we first demonstrate the overlooked fact that, according to Bohr, the measurement interaction is a physical, irreversible process and not merely an epistemic acquisition of new information. In this respect, quantum mechanics must be regarded not only as a universal theory, but also as revealing no non-arbitrary difference between a quantum realm and a classical realm; the distinction is purely pragmatic. The tension between the epistemic necessity to rely on a neatly distinguishable classical realm and the ontic non-separability of the quantum system and the classical apparatus inclined Bohr to refuse to provide a constructive account of the measurement process, such as that later proposed, for instance, by spontaneous dynamical reduction models.

2026-09-03T15:50:40Z Mauro Dorato Jan Faye http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03409v1 2026-09-03T06:12:48Z

In this paper, we do not try to solve the measurement problem, but rather to properly formulate it. One of the reasons why it still lacks a precise, agreed definition is that the problem may take very different aspects depending on the interpretation of quantum mechanics embraced. Inspired by the methodology of theory-independent results like Bell's theorem, we propose to identify the common root of the puzzle in an interpretation-independent way i.e. as a property of the empirical statistics only, before deriving its philosophical consequences. The key observation is that quantum matter can not be described by a Kolmogorovian probabilistic theory. Arguing that the Kolmogorov axioms of probability theory are the postulates of epistemic uncertainty leads us to reformulate the measurement problem as the impossibility to build an ontology independent of epistemology for quantum matter. Said differently, there exists no God's-eye view on quantum systems. Although it is meaningless to solve the measurement problem as defined in this way, insofar as it is a feature of the universe's statistics, such a formulation may on the other hand bring side benefits. In particular, we argue that it allows to: (i) shed a new light on the variety of interpretations; (ii) propose a fundamental reason why quantum mechanics and general relativity are so incompatible, not relying on purely mathematical or technical arguments; (iii) guide the quest for quantum gravity.

2026-09-03T06:12:48Z Antoine Soulas