https://arxiv.org/api/y64/CrByWi0a9tctEnVg1nMqd3w 2026-05-15T23:43:42Z 5592 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10549v2 2026-05-14T16:42:49Z

Many philosophers of physics maintain that a physical theory that exhibits (certain kinds of) symmetries is flawed, on the grounds that such theories posit "excess structure". In an influential paper, Dewar [2019, "Sophistication about Symmetries", \emph{Brit. J. Phil. Sci.} \textbf{70}: 485-521] introduces a distinction between "reduction" and "sophistication" as alternative ways of removing excess structure. In this paper we re-examine the distinction as Dewar draws it, and we argue that there is no physically or philosophically important distinction between what Dewar calls "reduction" and what he calls "internal sophistication". We then argue that there are multiple notions of "reduction" in the literature that ought to be distinguished, both in motivation and in outcome.

2025-11-13T17:51:30Z 28 pages. Forthcoming in Philosophy of Physics Clara Bradley James Owen Weatherall http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18115v2 2026-05-13T20:20:16Z

This work investigates the geometrical properties of self-gravitating $N$-body systems from the perspective established by Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein concerning the operational nature of measured geometry. Utilizing recent numerical analyses of central configurations--special equilibrium solutions to the Newtonian $N$-body problem--we uncover systematic spatial variations in nearest-neighbor particle separations correlated with the radial distance from the system's center of mass. We argue that these variations reflect a context-dependent, emergent effective geometry shaped by gravitational interactions, in accordance with Poincaré's assertion that measured geometry depends on the forces influencing measuring devices, and Einstein's view that rods and clocks define physical geometry through their local dynamics. By revisiting these foundational insights within a modern computational framework, we provide evidence that geometry in self-gravitating Newtonian systems is not a fixed background, but an emergent construct arising from internal physical interactions.

2026-02-20T10:07:42Z 6 pages, 5 figures. V2: 7 pages, 5 figures; discussion added. Version accepted for publication in PRD Maria I. R. Lourenço Julian Barbour Francisco S. N. Lobo http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09558v2 2026-05-13T17:42:05Z

Contextuality is considered as one of the most distinctive features of nonclassical systems. Here, we show that a Spekkens contextual system (which previous work has shown is a necessary condition for nonclassicality) formed of an odd-dimensional stabiliser system plus a magic state becomes noncontextual (a sufficient condition for classicality) under the action of a depolarising channel after a certain decoherence threshold. We show also that some quasiprobability representations are more effective than others in witnessing this transition from contextuality to noncontextuality. Given previous work has shown that magic states and Spekkens contextuality are both necessary for universal quantum computation, this result helps us understand the relationship between decoherence, Spekkens' generalised contextuality, and quantum advantage.

2026-05-10T14:18:53Z 12 pages, no figures Enrico Bozzetto Jonte R. Hance http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17838v3 2026-05-12T20:25:57Z

.This article reexamines the genesis of special relativity by situating the contributions of Lorentz, Poincare, and Einstein within the scientific, documentary, and editorial context of the years 1895--1913. It emphasizes the rapid circulation of Lorentz 1904 work, in particular through German-speaking channels such as the Beiblatter zu den Annalen der Physik, and reassesses the significance of Richard Gans 1905 review as a concise access point to Lorentz results. The article also discusses Poincaré role in formulating the principle of relativity, interpreting local time, establishing the group property of the Lorentz transformations, and developing an invariant formulation of electrodynamics. Against this background, Einstein 1905 paper appears not as an isolated creation, but as a powerful reformulation of problems already posed by Maxwellian electrodynamics and by the failure to detect motion through the ether. The article finally examines the subsequent construction of the Lorentz--Einstein--Minkowski canon and the relative exclusion of Poincare from that narrative. Its central claim is that special relativity should be understood as the crystallization of a broader electrodynamic transformation of physics, rather than as a sudden break detached from its immediate scientific context.

2025-10-06T10:24:59Z Hector Giacomini http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12582v1 2026-05-12T17:01:07Z

This article examines, from historical and pedagogical perspectives, Alphonse Berget's anticipation of Earth-Moon travel in Le Ciel (Larousse, 1923), decades before the beginning of the space age. The discussion is triggered by Le Ciel, a richly illustrated French popular science work, which has a devoted chapter examining lunar and interplanetary travel within a Newtonian framework. Although Berget's treatment was not developed in isolation and reflects a broader early 20th century context that included pioneers such as French aero-engineer Robert Esnault-Pelterie, the book provides a striking pedagogical synthesis of elementary celestial mechanics and scientific popularization. Unlike earlier fictional treatments such as Jules Verne's De la Terre a la Lune, Berget approached space travel using physical reasoning grounded in Newtonian gravitation. Using qualitative and semi-quantitative arguments based on the inverse-square law, he identified the principal phases of an Earth-Moon trajectory: escape from Earth, inertial translunar motion, transition through competing Earth-Moon gravitational fields, and final lunar capture and deceleration. His estimated Earth-Moon travel time of approximately 49 hours is of the same order of magnitude as Apollo mission transit times (approx. 72 h). We compare these early ideas with modern elementary concepts of astrodynamics, including restricted three-body trajectories, Lagrange-point dynamics, and distant retrograde orbits associated with the Artemis program. We also examine Berget's discussion of interplanetary travel, lunar landscapes, and human factors associated with prolonged voyages, including confinement, food supply, and travel duration. The analysis highlights the pedagogical value of historically grounded scientific reasoning underpinning spaceflight mechanics.

2026-05-12T17:01:07Z Tina A. Harriott Cherif F. Matta http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06695v2 2026-05-12T16:54:31Z

A projective quantum logic in terms of relative states is developed, emphasizing the importance of information transfer between a system under study and its environment. The need for accounting for the historical evolution of system is highlighted and it is found that the conjunction of observations involving conjugate variables can be consistently defined but is found to be non-commutative. It is shown that the Birkhoff and von Neumann approach to quantum logic is unable to deal with such conjunctions. It is found that whilst the proposed scheme is still not distributive in general, the discrepancy is directly related to interference effects that may disappear when information is transferred from the system to its environment. It is argued that the probabilities associated with projections be mapped to an orthocomplemented ternary logic, in which it is shown that the law of the excluded middle still holds.

2022-03-13T16:08:53Z After peer review of this paper, it is clear that there are severe conceptual problems with it that cannot be easily remedied Martin Paul Vaughan 10.13140/RG.2.2.11905.53606 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11420v1 2026-05-12T02:15:13Z

Over the past two decades, the rapid surge in data-intensive computational techniques for statistical modeling may have had the effect of diminishing the use of applied mathematics in causal scientific inquiry. In this paper, co-authored by an astrophysicist, a mathematician, and philosophers, we assess the hazards of neglecting the branch of mathematics that constructs models to address causal questions in favor of statistical modeling alone. Causality is relevant in all branches of science and is often elucidated through applied mathematics. Here, we illuminate the idea with examples drawn from space physics and medical sciences. We examine causal questions to demonstrate how applied mathematical and statistical methods may differentiate between two fundamental facets of causality, i.e., mechanistic and difference-making. Understanding such foundational differences in causality may, in some cases, help explain discrepant or erroneous research results. Most importantly, understanding the relationship between causality and analytical approaches used in science has the potential to strengthen the rigor and reliability of scientific inquiry through optimal selection of mathematical and/or statistical methods.

2026-05-12T02:15:13Z Marzieh Asgari-Targhi Ned Amene Asgari-Targhi Ned Mahboubeh Asgari-Targhi Ned Edward J. Ned Hall http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11058v1 2026-05-11T16:54:41Z

We present results from the Big Mysteries Survey, a large-scale survey conducted through the American Physical Society's Physics Magazine on foundational and controversial topics in contemporary physics. The survey provides a snapshot of physicists' views on issues in cosmology, black-hole physics, quantum mechanics, quantum gravity, and anthropic coincidences. A central finding is that several positions often described publicly as field-wide ``consensus'' views are, in practice, supported by much narrower majorities or by pluralities rather than majorities.

2026-05-11T16:54:41Z 31 pages, 12 figures, interactive data available at: https://nafshordi.github.io/aps-dashboard/ Niayesh Afshordi Phil Halper Matteo Rini Michael Schirber http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04159v2 2026-05-10T19:08:17Z

Can we infer whether all of physical reality began to exist? Several novel results are offered suggesting a negative verdict. First, a common strategy for defending a cosmic beginning involves showing that individual beginningless cosmological models are implausible. This strategy is shown to make an elementary error in confirmation theory. Second, two necessary (but not necessarily sufficient) conditions are offered for a cosmic beginning. Third, three extensions are offered to the Malament-Manchak theorems. The three extensions show that in almost all classical spacetimes, observers cannot collect sufficient data to determine whether the application conditions for the classic singularity theorems are satisfied or whether their spacetime satisfies the two necessary conditions for a cosmic beginning. Lastly, a reply is offered to the objection that the skeptical consequences of the three extensions can be overcome with induction. Importantly, all past singular dust FLRW spacetimes have observationally indistinguishable counterparts which, while sharing a number of important local properties, either do not include a singularity to the past of every point or else do not have the sort of time ordering intuitively required for a cosmic beginning.

2026-03-04T15:16:41Z Daniel Linford http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04664v2 2026-05-10T13:21:13Z

Quantum paradoxes show that the outcomes of different quantum measurements cannot be described by a single measurement-independent reality. Any theoretical description of a quantum measurement implies the selection of a specific measurement context. Here, we investigate generalised quantum measurements, in order to identify the mechanism by which this specific context is selected. We show that external quantum fluctuations, represented by the initial state of the measurement apparatus, play an essential role in the selection of the context. This has the non-trivial consequence that, when considering measurements other than just idealised projection-valued measures, different outcomes of a single measurement setup can represent different measurement contexts. We further show this result underpins recent claims that contextuality can occur in scenarios without measurement incompatibility.

2025-01-08T18:22:34Z 16 pages, 1 figure. Accepted in Quantum - matches accepted version Quantum 10, 2106 (2026) Jonte R. Hance Ming Ji Tomonori Matsushita Holger F. Hofmann 10.22331/q-2026-05-13-2106 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08642v1 2026-05-09T03:23:12Z

We develop a descriptive account of scientific reward in physics based on the concept of the time-dependent Polydoxon, defined as the structured set of empirically viable theories at a given time. We argue that highly rewarded contributions, such as those recognized by major prizes and professional honors, can be systematically understood as those that transform this space. These transformations take the form of expansion (adding viable theories), contraction (eliminating viable theories), reconfiguration (illuminating deeper structures and relations within and between theories), and enabling moves (methodological or technological advances that enable future transformations). The analysis is further refined by emphasizing that reward correlates with the transformation's magnitude, assessed along dimensions of scope, centrality, depth, and future leverage. This framework reframes the analysis of rewarded achievement away from isolated theoretical successes and toward the dynamics of a landscape of viable theories, providing a more unified descriptive interpretation of rewarded scientific activity in physics across its diverse set of theoretical and experimental discoveries.

2026-05-09T03:23:12Z 42 pages James D. Wells http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15866v2 2026-05-08T16:35:48Z

For more than half a century, dualities have been at the heart of modern physics. From quantum mechanics to statistical mechanics, condensed matter physics, quantum field theory and quantum gravity, dualities have proven useful in solving problems that are otherwise quite intractable. Being surprising and unexpected, dualities have been taken to raise philosophical questions about the nature and formulation of scientific theories, scientific realism, emergence, symmetries, explanation, understanding, and theory construction. This book discusses what dualities are, gives a selection of examples, explores the themes and roles that make dualities interesting, and highlights their most salient types. It aims to be an entry point into discussions of dualities in both physics and philosophy. The philosophical discussion emphasises three main topics: whether duals are theoretically equivalent, the view of scientific theories that is suggested by dualities (namely, a geometric view of theories), and the compatibility between duality and emergence.

2025-09-19T11:06:59Z This is the pre-submission version of a forthcoming Cambridge Element in the Foundations of Contemporary Physics and is available here: https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/dualities-in-physics/45667B3C71A2C7A5B347748239243EC7. When citing this work, please refer to the published version Sebastian De Haro Enrico Cinti 10.1017/9781009203845 http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09037v2 2026-05-08T11:03:31Z

This entry reviews Rudolf Carnap's philosophical views on the quantum mechanics of his time. It also offers some thoughts on how Carnap might have reacted to some recent developments in the foundations of quantum mechanics.

2023-04-18T14:56:00Z 8 pages; forthcoming in Carnap Handbuch, Metzler, ed. by Georg Schiemer and Christian Damböck Sebastian Horvat Iulian D. Toader http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07090v1 2026-05-08T01:16:15Z

The consistent histories formalism can be used to describe histories comprised of events across many systems, times, and places, plausibly rich enough to describe our experiences of the classical world; however, many consistent history sets are nonclassical and thus not obviously relevant to our experiences. Meanwhile, the program of environmentally induced decoherence identifies dynamically privileged classical degrees of freedom, but provides no general account of when or how many such degrees of freedom consistently combine to form histories. This work shows that the strengths of these two approaches can be combined by adopting a dynamics-first perspective on decoherence. Inspired by quantum causal models and quantum Darwinism, we define the process of decoherence in terms of the causal influences through unitary dynamics required for the proliferation of information about observables. We characterise decoherence as a property of the unitary dynamics, without presupposing the existence of any quantum state. Instead, we show that the state emerges from dual decoherence, related to decoherence by time-reversal of the unitary dynamics. Indeed, for any set of systems in an arbitrary unitary circuit, decoherence and its dual single out a privileged consistent history set -- and we demonstrate through examples that states emerge from dual decoherence while outcomes emerge from decoherence. Hence the idea that quantum states emerge from the process of decoherence turns out to be the key missing ingredient for unifying environmentally induced decoherence and consistent histories. Taking this idea ontologically seriously leads to a recently proposed causal interpretation of quantum theory or a dynamics-first version of the Everett interpretation. The causal approach also sheds light on the suppression of off-diagonal terms, time asymmetry, and robustness of the pointer basis.

2026-05-08T01:16:15Z 41+12 pages Nick Ormrod Tein van der Lugt Yìlè Yīng Jarosław K. Korbicz http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11065v2 2026-05-07T20:50:35Z

Physics seeks to uncover the laws of Nature and express them through mathematical equations. Despite the vast diversity of natural phenomena, physical equations exhibit structural regularities that set them apart from arbitrary mathematical expressions. While principles such as dimensional analysis have long guided the formulation of physical models, the exploration of more subtle statistical patterns within the equations of physics remains an open question. Here, by analysing four corpora of physics equations and applying advanced implicit-likelihood techniques, we find that the frequency of mathematical operators follows an exponential decay law, in contrast to Zipf's power law for word frequencies in natural languages. This reveals a statistical meta-law of physics, possibly reflecting a combination of communication efficiency and constraints imposed by Nature itself. The meta-law offers practical benefits for symbolic regression by drastically narrowing down the space of physically plausible expressions. More broadly, it may inform the development of language models that can generate coherent mathematical representations, advancing the automation of physical law discovery.

2024-08-12T18:34:57Z 11 pages, 5 figures, 2 table Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci (2026) 384 (2317): 20250091 Andrei Constantin Deaglan Bartlett Harry Desmond Pedro G. Ferreira 10.1098/rsta.2025.0091