https://arxiv.org/api/y64/CrByWi0a9tctEnVg1nMqd3w 2026-03-22T10:32:41Z 5537 0 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16050v5 2026-03-19T01:13:28Z

The simulation hypothesis has recently excited renewed interest in the physics and philosophy communities. However, the hypothesis specifically concerns {\textit{computers}} that simulate physical universes. So to formally investigate the hypothesis, we need to understand it in terms of computer science (CS) theory. In addition we need a formal way to couple CS theory with physics. Here I couple those fields by using the physical Church-Turing thesis. This allow me to exploit Kleene's second recursion, to prove that not only is it possible for {us} to be a simulation being run on a computer, but that we might be in a simulation being run a computer \emph{by us}. In such a ``self-simulation'', there would be two identical instances of us, both equally ``real''. I then use Rice's theorem to derive impossibility results concerning simulation and self-simulation; derive implications for (self-)simulation if we are being simulated in a program using fully homomorphic encryption; and briefly investigate the graphical structure of universes simulating other universes which contain computers running their own simulations. I end by describing some of the possible avenues for future research. While motivated in terms of the simulation hypothesis, the results in this paper are direct consequences of the Church-Turing thesis. So they apply far more broadly than the simulation hypothesis.

2024-04-09T18:39:46Z 47 pages of text, 5 pages of references, 13 pages of appendices David H. Wolpert http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.12543v3 2026-03-18T22:57:15Z

We present a new careful and comprehensive analysis the observations of the satellites of Jupiter from the Sidereus Nuncius that extends and complements previous similar studies. Each observation is compared to the predictions obtained using a modern sky simulator, verifying and trying to understand them individually. The work considers both the information that can be extracted from the sketches and the angular measurements reported by Galilei. Angular measurements allow assessing the absolute accuracy in relation to modern ephemerides. We evaluate the performances of the telescope in terms of separation power of close-by satellites and the inefficiency in the detection connected to the proximity to the disk. A sinusoidal fit of the data, allows measuring the relative major semi-axes of the satellites' orbits and their periods with a statistical precision of 2-4\% and 0.1-0.3\% respectively. The posterior fit error is used to estimate the measurements precision. We show that with this data one can infer in a convincing way the third law of Kepler for the Jupiter system. The 1:2:4 orbital resonance between the periods of Io and Europa/Ganymede can be determined with \% precision. In order to obtain these results it is important to separate the four datasets. This operation was an extremely difficult task for Galilei. Nevertheless we show how some indication on the periods emerge from the using the modern Lomb-Scargle technique on the full data-set. We briefly extend the use of the simulator to verify the accuracy in the seven observations of the Moon and the performance in reproducing the Pleiades, the Orion belt, the Orion head and the Beehive cluster. Finally we present images obtained with a replica of the telescope that highlights the challenges of these observations thus confirming the excellence underlying this amazing set of early scientific data.

2025-03-16T15:24:46Z this new version also contains a comparison of the sketches presented in the Sidereus and those in the handwritten notes (Appendix D) Andrea Longhin http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18100v1 2026-03-18T11:25:53Z

In this comment, we demonstrate that the claim by Spavieri et al., asserting that Wang et al.'s interferometric experiment disproves the special theory of relativity by revealing that simultaneity must be an absolute concept independent of the observer's state of motion, is based on circular reasoning and therefore constitutes a logical fallacy.

2026-03-18T11:25:53Z This article was published as a comment in the International Journal of Theoretical Physics Int J Theor Phys 65, 94 (2026) Justo Pastor Lambare 10.1007/s10773-026-06285-6 http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07883v3 2026-03-15T18:27:33Z

We explore the experimental predictions of the local scale invariant, non-Hermitian pilot-wave (de Broglie-Bohm) formulation of quantum theory introduced in arXiv:2601.03567. We use Weyl's definition of gravitational radius of charge to obtain the fine-structure constant for non-integrable scale effects $α_S$. The minuteness of $α_S$ relative to $α$ ($α_S/α\sim 10^{-21}$) effectively hides the effects in usual quantum experiments. In an Aharonov-Bohm double-slit experiment, the theory predicts that the position probability density depends on which slit the particle trajectory crosses, due to a non-integrable scale induced by the magnetic flux. This experimental prediction can be tested for an electrically neutral, heavy molecule with mass $m \sim 10^{-19} \text{g}$ at a $\sim 10^5 \text{ esu}$ flux regime. We analyse the Weyl-Einstein debate on the second-clock effect using the theory and show that spectral frequencies are history-independent. We thereby resolve Einstein's key objection against local scale invariance, and obtain two further experimental predictions. First, spectral intensities turn out to be history-dependent. Second, energy eigenvalues are modified by tiny imaginary corrections that modify spectral linewidths. We argue that the trajectory dependence of the probabilities renders our theory empirically distinguishable from other quantum formulations that do not use pilot-wave trajectories, or their mathematical equivalents, to derive experimental predictions.

2026-01-12T00:23:49Z 13 pages, 3 figures Indrajit Sen Matthew Leifer http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15387v3 2026-03-15T16:28:39Z

Many have have taken in hand to write a treatise on the Star of Bethlehem, particularly on Kepler's explanation as a stellar birth, triggered by Mars joining a great conjunction (a meeting of Jupiter and Saturn), as he observed it in October 1604. It is the aim of my short treatise to introduce, at a hopefully well digestible level, into underlying antiquity's concepts of physics, astrology, and astronomy around the time of Christ's birth and to demonstrate their essential developments up to the early modern period. In the latter, Kepler played a significant role. His contributions enabled him to calculate back to the year 7 BC with astonishing precision, locating a triple great conjunction in Pisces, which was then complemented by Mars. This is confirmed by both Babylonian tradition and modern astronomy. The following background provided may be specifically helpful for a more theologically oriented audience, also because the controversy surrounding "geocentric" and "heliocentric" world systems (Copernicus) is touched upon. And, because the overall context raises questions for theology, with which the epilogue concludes.

2025-09-18T19:52:48Z in German language Stephan F. Huckemann http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19242v3 2026-03-14T21:27:53Z

Once again, dispute has arisen over the interpretation of proposed quantum information theory experiments to probe the quantum nature of gravity by testing for gravitationally induced entanglement (GIE) between two spatially separated massive particles ([2] vs. [16, 17]; further contributions in [11, 13]). The confusion appears to reside in interpreting applications of a Hamiltonian formalism. But classical gravity cannot mediate entanglement on independent grounds. A Newton-Cartan analysis shows that if gravity is classical, a mediator, and entanglement is observed as an outcome of performing a GIE experiment, something other than gravity must have supplied the (virtual) force needed during the experiment to produce the effect.

2025-11-24T15:52:57Z 3.5 pages + references. Extends analysis provided originally in appendix B in arXiv:2205.09013. v3 expands on a few details to better make the piece stand alone from that earlier work Mike D. Schneider Nick Huggett Niels Linnemann http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.11571v1 2026-03-12T05:50:47Z

We formalize the concept of subtime -- a reversible mode of information interchange within entangled systems -- and show how classical time emerges as an asymptotic limit through decoherence. Building on the photon clock model, in which a single photon confined between two ideal mirrors creates an alternating causality regime, we develop a process-theoretic formalization using the Oreshkov--Costa--Brukner framework extended with an explicit time-reversal duality condition. We introduce Perfect Information Feedback (PIF) as the information-theoretic realization of this reversibility, demonstrating that mutual information is conserved in any closed causal loop and that entropy quantifies the degree of unreflected causality. We define the Reversible Causal Principle (RCP): every causal relation possesses a conjugate dual, and entropy, energy dissipation, and the classical arrow of time appear only when these alternating components decohere or fail to reflect perfectly. The framework unifies Wheeler--Feynman absorber theory, Bennett's reversible computation, Shannon's communication theory, and the process matrix formalism under a single symmetry principle, and identifies experimentally accessible signatures in reversible digital links and quantum switch experiments. The arrow of time, in this picture, records the universe's imperfect causal echo.

2026-03-12T05:50:47Z 15 pages, 33 references Paul L. Borrill http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01982v2 2026-03-11T17:46:57Z

We present a seven-pronged no-go result for quantum mechanics: a "heptalemma". It shows that seven initially plausible theses about physical reality are jointly inconsistent with the predictions of quantum mechanics, while any six are jointly consistent. We must then decide which theses to retain and which to give up. Since different interpretations of quantum mechanics entail different responses to the heptalemma, we get a novel taxonomy of such interpretations. Beyond the application to quantum mechanics, the heptalemma offers a general diagnostic criterion for determining whether a given scientific domain should count as classical or not, and if not, how it departs from classicality.

2025-12-01T18:39:40Z 36 pages, 1 figure, 1 table. v2: Minor updates after feedback. To appear in Foundations of Physics John B. DeBrota Christian List http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10601v1 2026-03-11T09:54:52Z

In this paper I argue against Carcassi, Calderon, and Aidala's recent claim that the Hilbert spaces are unphysical and should be replaced with the Schwartz spaces in quantum mechanics, since Hilbert spaces include states with infinite expectation values for certain observables. I also review and discuss issues regarding unbounded operators in quantum mechanics raised by Streater and Wightman, Heathcote, and Lemos. I argue that the existence of infinite expectation values does not cause problems in quantum mechanics. On the other hand, replacing the Hilbert spaces with the Schwartz spaces would cause more issues, as it would exclude a class of meaningful Hamiltonian evolutions. I also discuss the question in literature whether reformulating quantum mechanics with essentially self-adjoint operators instead of self-adjoint operators may cause problems. I further analyse the hierarchies of the notions of "physicality" and possibility in fundamental physics, and suggest that "physicality" is a vague concept. Finally, I connect the problem raised by Carcassi, Calderon, and Aidala with the problem of the Hadamard condition in quantum field theory.

2026-03-11T09:54:52Z Zhonghao Lu http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09901v1 2026-03-10T16:55:03Z

Quantum computational advantage was claimed for the first time in 2019 and several experiments since then have reinforced the claim. And yet, there is no consensus whether or not quantum advantage has actually been achieved. In this article, I address this question and argue that, in fact, it has. I also outline next steps for theory and experiments in quantum advantage.

2026-03-10T16:55:03Z This is a copyedited version of the original three-part mini series that was published on the Caltech Quantum Frontiers blog Dominik Hangleiter http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01204v3 2026-03-10T16:18:25Z

The cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman argues that we don't perceive reality: spacetime, objects, colors, sounds, tastes, and so forth, are all merely an interface that we evolved to track evolutionary fitness rather than to perceive truths about external reality. In this paper, I expound on his argument, then I extend it, primarily, by looking at key ideas in physics that are quite germane to it. Among the topics in physics that I discuss are black holes, the holographic principle, string theory, duality, quantum gravity, and special relativity. I discuss these ideas from physics with an eye to their relevance for Hoffman's view.

2022-12-19T07:17:24Z John Klasios http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09818v1 2026-03-10T15:44:47Z

This article surveys key conceptual and interpretational developments in quantum mechanics, tracing the theory from its foundational postulates to contemporary discussions of measurement, nonlocality, and the emergence of classicality. Beginning with the structure of Hilbert space and the postulates governing state evolution and measurement, the epistemic stance of the Copenhagen interpretation and its modern reformulations are examined. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument, Bell's theorem, and Hardy's paradox are then discussed as probes of locality and realism, alongside the deterministic but explicitly nonlocal de Broglie-Bohm theory. The measurement problem and the implications of contextuality are analyzed in relation to objective collapse models, which introduce new physical dynamics to account for definite outcomes. Finally, the role of decoherence in the suppression of interference and the emergence of classical behavior is explored, together with the interpretational frameworks of many-worlds and consistent histories. This material aims to provide a coherent introductory overview of how different interpretations address the central concern of what quantum mechanics tells us about the nature of physical reality.

2026-03-10T15:44:47Z 14 pages, 3 figures. Invited submission to Lectures from the 33rd Chris Engelbrecht Summer School, Stellenbosch 2025 Theodore McKeever Ahsan Nazir http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09699v1 2026-03-10T14:08:13Z

The problem of time of quantum gravity has been argued to make canonical approaches unsatisfactory. In this article I study how it affects quantum cosmology and reach the same conclusion. The advantage of studying the cosmological case is that its simplicity makes the discussion much clearer and less technical. The classical models I will be concerned with describe how two degrees of freedom, the scale factor and a scalar field, evolve with respect to a time variable. After quantizing the model, this time variable just disappears, and I argue that this is problematic. Indeed, this variable in the classical model allowed us to make claims like `the universe is 13.8 billion years old' and I will argue that these claims are physically meaningful predictions that are lost in quantum cosmology. I will analyze some of the relational positions in the quantum gravity and quantum cosmology literature that tend to deny the physical meaning of time variables and I will argue against them for the case of classical cosmology. I conclude that the age of the universe is a physical prediction of classical cosmological models, that it is missing from quantum cosmology, and that this should make us suspect that there is something wrong with this sort of approach.

2026-03-10T14:08:13Z Published in Journal for General Philosophy of Science (2026) Álvaro Mozota Frauca 10.1007/s10838-025-09754-4 http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09626v1 2026-03-10T13:05:04Z

Inter-level connections in science routinely require constructs that neither of the connected theories contains. Statistical mechanics requires assumptions such as the Stosszahlansatz to generate thermodynamic irreversibility - assumptions that Hamiltonian mechanics cannot provide. Quantum chemistry offers four incompatible analyses of chemical bonding for the same quantum state, none of which are selected by the Schrodinger dynamics. Molecular genetics has not converged on a stable definition of the gene despite decades of molecular detail. These are not isolated anomalies but instances of a common architectural pattern. The missing apparatus is the bridge theory: a third theoretical role that connects a dynamical theory to an observational theory through a many-to-one inter-level map. That map generates the contingent space - the set of dynamical states compatible with an observational description but not selected by it - whose geometry neither connected theory determines. Completing the bridge theory requires three conditions in order: a Partition that defines observational equivalence classes; a Magnitude that characterizes the geometry and scale of the contingent space; and a Closure that selects or weights its elements. The framework yields an objective distinction between closing and introducing rules, formalized by the Mirror Test, and supports a tripartite taxonomy of emergence. It explains why some inter-level disputes persist and what would be required to resolve them.

2026-03-10T13:05:04Z Harry Sticker http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07684v1 2026-03-08T15:35:45Z

Chaos theory is a branch of classical physics, founded in the 1960s-70s, that studies systems whose solutions are sensitively dependent on their initial conditions. For many, it is surprising that chaos theory arrived so late. However, through the work of Henri Poincaré, we know that much of the math of chaos was understood by some 70 years prior. Furthermore, through the writings of Poincaré's colleagues -- Jacques Hadamard and Pierre Duhem -- we also see a detailed understanding of the chaos found in his work. They also have explicit reasons of why the math of chaos was to be ignored. It was a strict form of empiricism -- positivism -- causing them to label chaos as ``useless'' and ``meaningless'' mathematics because it was thought to be ungrounded in experience. In this paper, I describe how the empiricist tenets of positivism exiled chaos from physics following Poincaré.

2026-03-08T15:35:45Z Brett Park 10.1016/j.shpsa.2026.102133