https://arxiv.org/api/jygfUGSr3LYMSWnRlY/3o31zcyk 2026-06-13T13:40:14Z 4600 405 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10379v1 2025-08-14T06:18:48Z

A group of university bachelors teachers of open inquiry lab courses in science subjects collaborated in a Networked Faculty Learning Community (NFLC) with the final goal to share their course materials publicly. In this paper we describe their collaborative process, communication on the topic and their road to a common definition of open inquiry as a didactical method. The study emerged organically during the collaboration of this NFLC as the group increasingly recognized the value of documenting their endeavours, allowing others to learn and grow as they did. We can conclude that learning takes place in such a community, even though professional development was not the NFLC s intention.

2025-08-14T06:18:48Z Study on a learning community on the request of the learning community members themselves. 16 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables Lesley G. A. de Putter Marloes M. H. G. Hendrickx http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09953v1 2025-08-13T17:13:58Z

Physics programs are continually evolving to better support student learning and meet the diverse needs of their populations. Achieving many of these goals requires not only structural adjustments but also fundamental shifts in departmental culture. Recognizing this, disciplinary organizations in physics have placed systemic change and equity at the center of reform efforts, identifying them as essential pillars of meaningful and sustainable change. Yet tools for assessing departmental culture around educational change remain limited. In this study, we introduce the Culture around Systemic Change Survey (CSCS), a new instrument designed to measure faculty and staff perceptions of their department's "current" and "ideal" states. Using responses from the "current" scale only (N=111 participants across 33 departments), we conducted a psychometric evaluation of the CSCS. Exploratory factor analysis supported a five-factor structure, including Open-Mindedness (OM), Student Involvement (SI), Collective Interpretation of Evidence (CE), Sustainability (S), and Disruption of Systemic Injustices (DI). As survey development is an iterative process, future work will focus on refinement and confirmatory analysis. This work sets the foundation for conducting population studies that assess the state of progress of the physics community along an equitable and systemic culture to pursuing educational change.

2025-08-13T17:13:58Z 24 pages, 4 figures, 12 tables Diana Sachmpazidi Randy Mike Verostek Randy Jayna Petrella Randy Siwoo Randy Lee Chandra Turpen http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09923v1 2025-08-13T16:19:50Z

Small group activities have been widely adopted in college level science courses. As students participate in these activities, it is important to consider how group members collectively regulate their activity and complete group task. Regulation in a group often involves adaptive responsivity from group members when they notice and deal with a challenge. The theoretical framework of socially shared regulation emphasizes group members collaboratively regulating within the group but does not focus on portraying how the shared regulation is developed in the moment. Currently, the field lacks a framework characterizing the momentary development of a regulatory action in a group. Our study addresses this gap. In our video data, incoming college students were enrolled in a summer program designed to promote students metacognitive skills to be incorporated in their study of science. We have observed various moments in which the students spontaneously made a move to regulate the hands-on, inquiry activity in completing their tasks and achieving group goals. We developed a framework called Emergent Explicit Regulation to characterize those moments. The EER framework captures students in the moment regulatory moves to respond to a challenge, articulating how those moves emerge, in what ways they are explicit and regulatory. In this paper, we first introduce the EER framework and situate the EER framework in the context of collaborative scientific inquiry learning. We then present a case study where we applied the EER framework to identify typical EER instances in one small group when the students completed the task of building a model to represent the climate of the Earth atmosphere. They worked collaboratively, faced and handled various challenges, completed the group task, and demonstrated multiple EERs in different psychological areas and in the inquiry practices designed in the activity.

2025-08-13T16:19:50Z 37 pages, 14 figures Ying Cao Tong Wan Andrew Burns Ethan Cusack Pierre-Philippe A. Ouimet http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09917v1 2025-08-13T16:12:01Z

Despite the prevalence of physics education research literature related to problem solving, recent studies have illustrated that opportunities for ``authentic'' problem solving -- conceptualized as making decisions with limited information using one's physics knowledge -- are limited at both the graduate and undergraduate levels in physics curricula. Building on one of these studies, we designed a supplemental intervention for a graduate-level quantum mechanics course which scaffolded the practice of making some of these critical decisions using the conceptual framework of deliberate practice. Despite similar incentive structures as prior interventions focused on conceptual understanding in similar contexts, we did not measure any statistically significant improvement in students' problem solving skills following our intervention, though faculty members involved with the next course and written qualifying exams indicated the students showed better-than-usual conceptual understanding. We explore a number of potential explanations for this disconnect and suggest future avenues of research in this area.

2025-08-13T16:12:01Z 4 Pages, 3 Figures Michael E. Robbins Guillaume M. Laurent Eric W. Burkholder http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09906v1 2025-08-13T16:04:16Z

Students interpret grades as signals of their strengths, and grades inform students' decisions about majors and courses of study. Differences in grades that are not related to learning can impact this judgment and have real-world impact on course-taking and careers. Existing work has examined how an overemphasis on high-stakes exams can create equity gaps where female students and Black, Hispanic, and Native American students earn lower grades than male students and Asian and white students, respectively. Yet, minimal work has examined how the weighting of individual midterm exam scores can also contribute to equity gaps. In this work, we examine how three midterm exam score aggregation methods for final grades affect equity gaps. We collected midterm exam data from approximately 6,000 students in an introductory physics course over 6 years at a large, research-intensive university. Using this data set, we applied common midterm exam score aggregation methods to determine their impact on aggregated midterm exam grades: dropping the lowest midterm exam score, replacing the lowest midterm exam score with the final exam score if higher, and counting the highest midterm exam score more in the final grade calculation than the lowest midterm exam score. We find that dropping the lowest midterm exam score resulted in the largest increase in final grades, with students with lower grades benefiting the most. However, we find limited evidence that alternative midterm exam aggregation methods could close equity gaps. Implementing the alternative midterm exam aggregation methods examined here may be useful for instructors wanting to raise course grades or give lower-scoring students a boost. However, they do not appear to be effective in reducing equity gaps.

2025-08-13T16:04:16Z 17 pages, 6 figures Nicholas T. Young Rebecca L. Matz Eric F. Bell Caitlin Hayward http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09825v1 2025-08-13T13:59:22Z

The abilities of Generative-Artificial Intelligence (AI) to produce real-time, sophisticated responses across diverse contexts has promised a huge potential in physics education, particularly in providing customized feedback. In this study, we investigate around 1200 introductory students' preferences about AI-feedback generated from three distinct prompt types: (a) self-crafted, (b) entailing foundational prompt-engineering techniques, and (c) entailing foundational prompt-engineering techniques along with principles of effective-feedback. The results highlight an overwhelming fraction of students preferring feedback generated using structured prompts, with those entailing combined features of prompt engineering and effective feedback to be favored most. However, the popular choice also elicited stronger preferences with students either liking or disliking the feedback. Students also ranked the feedback generated using their self-crafted prompts as the least preferred choice. Students' second preferences given their first choice and implications of the results such as the need to incorporate prompt engineering in introductory courses are discussed.

2025-08-13T13:59:22Z Amogh Sirnoorkar N. Sanjay Rebello http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14084v1 2025-08-13T08:02:05Z

Quantum computing (QC) promises to be a transformative technology with impact on various application domains, such as optimization, cryptography, and material science. However, the technology has a sharp learning curve, and practical evaluation and characterization of quantum systems remains complex and challenging, particularly for students and newcomers from computer science to the field of quantum computing. To address this educational gap, we introduce Q-BEAST, a practical course designed to provide structured training in the experimental analysis of quantum computing systems. Q-BEAST offers a curriculum that combines foundational concepts in quantum computing with practical methodologies and use cases for benchmarking and performance evaluation on actual quantum systems. Through theoretical instruction and hands-on experimentation, students gain experience in assessing the advantages and limitations of real quantum technologies. With that, Q-BEAST supports the education of a future generation of quantum computing users and developers. Furthermore, it also explicitly promotes a deeper integration of High Performance Computing (HPC) and QC in research and education.

2025-08-13T08:02:05Z This paper is submitted and accepted in the Fourth Annual Quantum Science and Engineering Education Conference (QSEEC25), which is collocated with the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing & Engineering (QCE25), part of IEEE Quantum Week 2025 Minh Chung Yaknan Gambo Burak Mete Xiao-Ting Michelle To Florian Krötz Korbinian Staudacher Martin Letras Xiaolong Deng Mounika Vavilala Amir Raoofy Jorge Echavarria Luigi Iapichino Laura Schulz Josef Weidendorfer Martin Schulz http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08842v1 2025-08-12T11:02:09Z

It is astonishing how rapidly general-purpose AI has crossed familiar thresholds in introductory physics. Comparing outputs from successive models, GPT-5 Thinking moves far beyond the plug-and-chug tendencies seen earlier: on a classic elevator problem it works symbolically, notes when variables cancel, and verifies results; attempts to prompt novice-like behavior mainly affect tone, not method. On representation translation, the model scores 24/26 (92.3%) on TUG-Kv4.0. In a card-sorting proxy using two of my comprehensive finals (60 items), its categories reflect solution method rather than surface features. Solving those same exams, it attains 27/30 and 25/30, with most misses in ruler-based ray tracing and circuit interpretation. On epistemology, five independent CLASS runs yield 100\% favorable, indicating a simulated expert-like stance. Framed as a "boiling frog" problem, the paper argues for a decisive jump: retire credit-bearing unsupervised closed-response online assessments; grade process evidence; use paper, whiteboarding; shift weight to modeling, data, and authentic labs; require transparent, citable AI use; rebuild problem types; and lean on research-based instruction and peer learning. The opportunity is to foreground what AI cannot substitute for: modeling the world, arguing from evidence, and making principled approximations.

2025-08-12T11:02:09Z Phys. Teach. 64, 8-12 (2026) Gerd Kortemeyer 10.1119/5.0296601 http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15789v1 2025-08-11T21:21:47Z

Ohm's law is crucial for understanding electrical circuits and conductive materials. Formulated by Georg Simon Ohm in the 19th century, it describes the direct proportional relationship between electric voltage and electric current in ohmic conductors. Despite its apparent simplicity, the literature has pointed out that students at different educational levels have difficulty understanding it, especially due to the abstraction associated with the concepts of electric voltage, electric current, and electrical resistance. In order to provide possibilities to overcome this abstraction and the associated learning difficulties, the present work proposes an experimental activity that applies Ohm's law to determine the nanometer-scale thickness of 6B graphite traces deposited on tracing paper. The employed methodology is based on measuring physical quantities such as electric voltage, electric current, and length, and on analyzing the collected data. The thickness of the graphite traces determined by this method was also compared with values obtained using a scanning probe microscope (SPM). Based on the proposed methodology, the thickness of the traces was determined to be 456.5(34)~nm, while SPM measurements yielded an average thickness of 440(50)~nm. Thus, the results show good agreement between the measurements within experimental uncertainties, validating the effectiveness of the suggested methodology and indicating that it is a viable proposal for electricity courses in higher education and, with adaptations, even for high school.

2025-08-11T21:21:47Z 56 pages, in Portuguese language, 14 figures, 26 tables Paulo Henrique Eleuterio Falsetti André Coelho da Silva Leonardo Geraldino da Silva Douglas Mendes da Silva Del Duque Murilo Antonio Menegati Bruno Fernando Gianelli Vagner Romito de Mendonça Idelma Aparecida Alves Terra 10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2025-0481 http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08422v1 2025-08-11T19:17:09Z

Substantial research indicates that active learning methods improve student learning more than traditional lecturing. Accordingly, current studies aim to characterize and evaluate different instructors' implementations of active learning methods. Peer Instruction is one of the most commonly used active learning methods in undergraduate physics instruction and typically involves the use of classroom response systems (e.g., clickers) where instructors pose conceptual questions that students answer individually and/or in collaboration with nearby peers. Several research studies have identified that different instructors vary in the ways they implement Peer Instruction (e.g., the time they give students to answer a question and the time they spend explaining the correct answer); however, these studies only take place at a single institution and do not relate the implementation of Peer Instruction to student learning. In this study, we analyze variation in both the implementation and impacts of Peer Instruction. We use classroom video observations and conceptual inventory data from seven introductory physics instructors across six U.S. institutions. We characterize implementation using the Framework for Interactive Learning in Lectures (FILL+), which classifies classroom activities as interactive (e.g., clicker questions), vicarious interactive (e.g., individual students asking a question), or non-interactive (e.g., instructor lecturing). Our preliminary results suggest that instructors who use both interactive and vicarious interactive strategies may exhibit larger student learning gains than instructors who predominantly use only one of the two strategies.

2025-08-11T19:17:09Z Ibukunoluwa Bukola Meagan Sundstrom Justin Gambrell Olive Ross Adrienne L. Traxler Eric Brewe 10.1119/perc.2025.pr.Bukola http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08417v1 2025-08-11T19:10:27Z

An increasing number of studies in physics education research use social network analysis to quantify interactions among students. These studies typically gather data through online surveys using one of two different survey formats: recognition, where students select peers' names from a provided course roster, and recall, where students type their peers' names from memory as an open response. These survey formats, however, may be subject to two possible systematic errors. First, students may report more peers' names on a recognition survey than a recall survey because the course roster facilitates their memory of their interactions, whereas they may only remember a subset of their interactions on the recall format. Second, recognition surveys may be subject to name order effects, where students are more likely to select peers' names that appear early on in the roster than those that appear later on (e.g., due to survey fatigue). Here we report the results of two methodological studies of these possible errors in the context of introductory physics courses: one directly comparing 65 student responses to recognition and recall versions of the same network survey prompt, and the other measuring name order effects on 54 recognition surveys from 27 different courses. We find that students may report more peer interactions on a recognition survey than a recall survey and that most recognition surveys are not subject to significant name order effects. These results help to inform survey design for future network studies in physics education research.

2025-08-11T19:10:27Z Meagan Sundstrom Justin Gambrell Adrienne L. Traxler Eric Brewe 10.1119/perc.2025.pr.Sundstrom http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08133v1 2025-08-11T16:09:34Z

Developing expert-like problem-solving skills is a central goal of undergraduate physics education. In this study, we investigate the impact of teaching explicit problem-solving frameworks, combined with deliberate practice, on students' problem-solving approaches. Using multidimensional scaling to analyze students' decision-making patterns, we compare the similarity of students taught with these methods to physics experts and to students taught with traditional repeated practice. Our results show that students who received structured frameworks and targeted feedback through deliberate practice exhibited problem-solving behaviors significantly more aligned with those of experts. These findings suggest that pedagogies emphasizing explicit strategy instruction with feedback are more effective than rote repetition for fostering expertise. We recommend integration of these approaches into physics curricula to better support the development of skilled and adaptive problem solvers.

2025-08-11T16:09:34Z 17 pages, 5 figures Kelly Miller Olivia Miller Georgia Lawrence http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07526v1 2025-08-11T01:03:31Z

Numeric simulations based on the Huygens-Fresnel method allow one to develop intuition about the behavior of coherent light in diffraction and interference experiments. They give an opportunity to numerically observe and appreciate a number important phenomena, while avoiding the need to deal with the intricacies of their analytic descriptions. In an introductory teaching lab, they help to build a matrix of ideas, into which many optical demonstration experiments fall nicely and to the benefit of a student.

2025-08-11T01:03:31Z Supplemental Mathematica notebook, 11 pages, 15 figures Ya. B. Bazaliy http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06254v1 2025-08-08T12:19:15Z

Providing effective, personalized support is critical for helping students overcome conceptual difficulties in physics. However, established scaffolding methods, such as structured tiered support, are often too resource-intensive for widespread implementation. Therefore, this study, investigates whether an easily adaptable, custom-configured AI chatbot can offer comparable affective benefits and cognitive relief. We conducted a quasi-experimental field study with 273 ninth-grade students in Germany. Classes were randomly assigned to solve a buoyancy problem using one of three conditions: an AI chatbot, a tiered support system, or traditional textbook-style explanations. We measured intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load and affective outcomes (enjoyment, hope, hopelessness, self-efficacy, situational interest) via research-validated questionnaires. Results revealed that both interactive support systems -- the custom-configured AI chatbot and tiered hints -- were significantly more effective than the textual support in reducing students' intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load. Furthermore, the AI chatbot yielded the most comprehensive affective benefits, demonstrating significant improvements across all measured affective dimensions, when compared to the textual support. While the chatbot consistently trended more positively than the tiered hints on affective measures, these differences were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that while structured guidance is key to managing cognitive load, the interactive and social nature of AI chatbots holds unique potential for simultaneously fostering positive affective experiences, marking a promising direction for developing effective and holistic learning support tools in physics education.

2025-08-08T12:19:15Z E. Becker J. Wünsche J. M. Veith J. Schrader P. Bitzenbauer http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06582v1 2025-08-08T00:15:46Z

Experience with experimental and computational work are important components of students' understanding of the practice of physics. Physics departments typically use specific experimental lab courses and computational lab courses to develop students' skills in these areas. However these siloed experiences do not accurately represent the nuanced interplay between the theory, computation, and experiment that occurs outside of the curricular setting when physicists are building and testing models of the physical world. To expose students to this interplay, we have integrated computational and experimental work as equal partners within two radioactivity labs that occur within our modern physics lab course - the decay of $^{137}{\rm Ba}$ and the simultaneous decay of two silver isotopes in pre-1965 quarters. We present both of these labs and potential extensions that allow students to iterate on their theoretical, computational and/or experimental models based on what they learn from their initial investigation.

2025-08-08T00:15:46Z Martha-Elizabeth Baylor Luis A. Miranda Almanzar Adward Frazier Adam Mahabir Jay D. Tasson