https://arxiv.org/api/rDn5fZrZgnaXgs/RH27KVH+iMvY2026-06-10T21:31:37Z459730015http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16169v1Why every solar eclipse viewing event needs a disco ball2025-10-17T19:24:31ZSolar eclipses offer unparalleled opportunities for public engagement in astronomy. Large groups of people often gather to view eclipses, and these events require affordable and easy to use tools to safely observe the Sun. One unique way to observe a solar eclipse is by using a disco ball. Here, we present an analysis of the experiences of educators who used a disco ball as a solar projector during various public outreach events. Through a survey conducted shortly after the April 2024 total solar eclipse and the March 2025 partial solar eclipse, we collected data on the use, engagement, and perceived educational value of a disco ball projector from 31 individual events. The results suggest that disco balls were not only affordable and safe, but also popular and educational.2025-10-17T19:24:31Z22 pages, 8 figures, to be published in CAPJournal Volume 19 Issue 2Valerie A. RapsonAlex PietrowRobert J. CummingJill BurnsAli CottonYashashree JadhavMaria D. KazachenkoCasper A. L. PietrowLivia M. A. PietrowDennis SchatzElliot SevernSundar SrinivasanWilliam ThornburghAndrea WarkentinHayley Yasui10.5281/zenodo.17181556http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16137v1Exploring the potential of ChatGPT for feedback and evaluation in experimental physics2025-10-17T18:22:18ZThis study explores how generative artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, can assist in the evaluation of laboratory reports in Experimental Physics. Two interaction modalities were implemented: an automated API-based evaluation and a customized ChatGPT configuration designed to emulate instructor feedback. The analysis focused on two complementary dimensions-formal and structural integrity, and technical accuracy and conceptual depth. Findings indicate that ChatGPT provides consistent feedback on organization, clarity, and adherence to scientific conventions, while its evaluation of technical reasoning and interpretation of experimental data remains less reliable. Each modality exhibited distinctive limitations, particularly in processing graphical and mathematical information. The study contributes to understanding how the use of AI in evaluating laboratory reports can inform feedback practices in experimental physics, highlighting the importance of teacher supervision to ensure the validity of physical reasoning and the accurate interpretation of experimental results.2025-10-17T18:22:18Z5 pagesMarcos AbreuÁlvaro SuárezCecilia StariArturo C. Martihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15792v1Peer Influence on Physics Self-Efficacy and Grades: A comparative study of students in an introductory calculus-based course who typically worked alone or in groups before and during the pandemic2025-10-17T16:14:48ZEngaging in meaningful collaborations with peers, both inside and outside the classroom, can greatly enhance students' understanding of physics and other STEM disciplines. We analyzed the characteristics of women and men who typically worked alone versus those who collaborated with peers in a calculus-based introductory physics course comparing pre pandemic traditional in-person classes to Zoom based pandemic classes. We discuss our findings by considering students' prior academic preparation, their physics grades and physics self-efficacy, as well as their perceptions of how effective peer collaboration is for their physics self-efficacy. We also compared our results to the first-semester algebra-based introductory physics course.2025-10-17T16:14:48ZJournal of College Science Teaching (2025): 1-14Apekshya GhimireChandralekha Singh10.1080/0047231X.2025.2555895http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15785v1Investigating High School and Pre-High School Teachers' Perceptions and Experiences Introducing Quantum Concepts: A Survey of QuanTime and other Quantum-related Activities2025-10-17T16:08:09ZThis study investigates the experiences of pre-high and high school teachers in implementing QuanTime and other quantum-related activities aiming to promote quantum literacy and introduce foundational quantum concepts to K-12 students. The ultimate goal is to help prepare a diverse future workforce in quantum information science and technology (QIST). Teachers were divided into two groups: pre-high school (grades 4-8) and high school (grades 9-12). We used a survey featuring 12 Likert-scale questions and 14 open-ended responses to assess teachers' perceptions, engagement, and feedback about engaging in QuanTime and other quantum-related activities. Approximately two-thirds of the teachers responding to the survey implemented QuanTime activities in their classes. High school teachers who responded to the survey were most likely to use activities like Wave-Particle Duality and Electron Transitions while pre-high school teachers showed a strong interest in Art & Polarization. Open-ended feedback highlighted the ease of integrating these activities into existing curricula and the minimal preparation required, making them accessible for educators. The positive reception across both groups indicates that QuanTime and other quantum-related activities are valuable tools for early-age quantum education. By engaging students with quantum concepts from a young age, these activities have the potential to spark interest, which may contribute to their future engagement over time. It can inspire a diverse group of students and has the potential to get them interested in future opportunities in the growing field of QIST.2025-10-17T16:08:09ZEPJ Quantum Technology Volume 12, article number 89, (2025)Apekshya GhimireJaya Shivangani KashyapEmily EdwardsDiana FranklinChandralekha Singh10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00392-9http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00022v4Scaling Physical Reasoning with the PHYSICS Dataset2025-10-17T08:01:52ZLarge Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress on advanced reasoning tasks such as mathematics and coding competitions. Meanwhile, physics, despite being both reasoning-intensive and essential to real-world understanding, received limited academic and industrial attention. This paper introduces PHYSICS, a dataset containing 16,568 high-quality physics problems spanning subjects and difficulty levels, to facilitate this issue. Specifically, PHYSICS is curated with exercises from over 100 textbooks through a carefully designed pipeline for quality control. It covers five major physics domains: Mechanics, Electromagnetism, Thermodynamics, Optics, and Modern Physics. It also spans a wide range of difficulty levels, from high school to graduate-level physics courses. To utilize the data for improving and evaluating the model's physical reasoning capabilities, we split the dataset into training and test sets, and provide reasoning paths generated by powerful reasoning models for the training data to facilitate model training. In addition, for the evaluation part, we find that existing evaluation frameworks exhibit biases in aspects such as units, simplification, and precision in physics domain. To balance efficiency and accuracy, we introduce a Rule+Model evaluation framework tailored to physics problems. Our evaluations on current state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary models highlight the limitations of current models in handling physics-related tasks. We hope that our dataset and evaluation methodology will jointly advance the development of LLMs in the field of physics. The code and data can be found at: https://github.com/Zhengsh123/PHYSICS.2025-05-21T17:06:28ZAccepted to the NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks TrackShenghe ZhengQianjia ChengJunchi YaoMengsong WuHaonan HeNing DingYu ChengShuyue HuLei BaiDongzhan ZhouGanqu CuiPeng Yehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14793v1Reflections of quantum educators on strategies to diversify the second quantum revolution2025-10-16T15:27:45ZWe focus on reflections and suggestions of five college quantum educators from four different institutions (two from same institution) regarding what can be done to diversify the second quantum revolution. They are leading QIST researchers, and very passionate about improving quantum education. The educators were asked about their thoughts on whether the interdisciplinary nature of the field, in which nobody can claim to be an expert in all aspects of QIST, may make it easier to create a better culture from the beginning, supportive of equitable participation of diverse groups unlike physics. This is because disciplines such as physics have an ingrained inequitable culture based on brilliance attribution that is a major impediment to diversity, equity and inclusion. Educators were interviewed on Zoom using a semi-structured think-aloud protocol about various issues related to QIST education including those pertaining to how to diversify the second quantum revolution. Their suggestions can be invaluable and can help other educators adapt and implement strategies to diversify QIST.2025-10-16T15:27:45ZThe Physics Teacher 63, 35-39 (2025)Apekshya GhimireChandralekha Singh10.1119/5.0223983http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14082v1FeynCraft: A Game of Feynman Diagrams2025-10-15T20:37:48ZFeynCraft is a browser-based game that is designed to teach players the particle interactions of the Standard Model of particle physics, and how to link these interactions together to produce valid Feynman diagrams. It is primarily targeted at undergraduates and lecturers in introductory courses in particle physics, but we anticipate that it should also be useful for school pupils and teachers studying the basics of particle physics, and perhaps also current researchers. Users may draw particle lines and link them together to form vertices and complete diagrams, and FeynCraft determines invalid vertices using a sequence of simple rules, showing users which vertices are invalid and why. Diagrams may be drawn that involve both fundamental Standard Model particles and hadrons (where hadrons are represented by their constituent quark content). Users can also be presented with a process for which they must draw valid Feynman diagrams -- FeynCraft is able to generate such 'problems' at random, but there is also the facility to create, share, import and solve curated sets of problems. Alternatively, one is able to specify the process, and ask FeynCraft itself to generate the Feynman diagrams. Finally, we include several overlay options that give more information on a Feynman diagram (e.g. QCD colour flow, interaction strengths), and the option to export a drawn diagram as LaTeX code.2025-10-15T20:37:48Z43 pages, 20 figures. Game can be played at https://jgaunt.itch.io/feyncraft, source code can be found at https://github.com/JonathanGaunt/feyncraft-srcJonathan R. GauntAdam Owenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14046v1Using Unguided Peer Collaboration to Facilitate Early Educators' Pedagogical Development: An Example from Physics TA Training2025-10-15T19:35:23ZMany early career educators, such as teaching assistants (TAs) in college courses, as well as pre-college educators, need help both with content and pedagogical knowledge to effectively help their students learn. One pedagogical approach that has been found effective in prior studies is collaboration with peers. Collaborative learning not only has the potential to help educators develop content knowledge but can also improve their pedagogical knowledge. This study examines the performance of physics graduate students, enrolled in a professional development course for teaching assistants (TAs), on the Magnetism Conceptual Survey, highlighting the impact of peer collaboration on learning both content and pedagogy. Peer interaction significantly improved performance, driven by both construction of knowledge (where the group answered a question correctly but only one member had the correct individual response) and co-construction of knowledge (where the group succeeded despite both members initially answering incorrectly). Beyond improving content understanding, peer collaboration can also foster pedagogical skills by encouraging early educators such as TAs to use peers as learning resources and communicate ideas effectively to support mutual understanding. These dual benefits-enhancing both content mastery and teaching abilities-demonstrate that this approach holds value not only for the professional development of TAs but can also be adapted for pre-college professional development programs to improve teaching and learning outcomes.2025-10-15T19:35:23ZEducation Sciences 2025, 15(8), 1038Apekshya GhimireChandralekha Singh10.3390/educsci15081038http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14042v1Introductory Physics Students in Algebra-based Courses Who Typically Worked Alone or in Groups: Insights from Gender-Based Analysis before and during COVID-192025-10-15T19:25:30ZCollaboration with peers both inside and outside the classroom can be an invaluable tool for helping students learn physics. We investigated the impact of peer collaboration on learning physics by examining the characteristics of women and men who typically worked alone versus those who typically collaborated with peers in their algebra-based introductory physics course when they took the course before and during the COVID-19 pandemic when the classes were on Zoom. Our findings indicate that, on average, students who worked with peers had higher grades and reported greater peer influence on their physics self-efficacy during the pandemic compared to those who worked alone. We also observed that, for both women and men, a larger percentage of students typically worked in groups before the pandemic, while a greater percentage typically worked alone during the pandemic. We discuss these results in relation to students' prior academic preparation, physics grades, self-efficacy and their perception of the effectiveness of peer collaboration on their physics self-efficacy.2025-10-15T19:25:30ZEducation Sciences 2024, 14(10), 1135Apekshya GhimireChandralekha Singh10.3390/educsci14101135http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13806v1How often does unguided peer interaction lead to correct response consensus? An example from Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism2025-10-15T17:59:32ZIn this research, we investigated the impact of peer collaboration and changes from individual to group performance of graduate students on the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM) without any guidance from the instructor. We define construction of knowledge as a case in which the group answered the question correctly but in the individual administration of the survey before the group work, one member gave the correct answer and the other gave incorrect answer. We find that there was a significant improvement in the performance of students after peer interaction, which was mostly attributed to construction of knowledge. However, students had very few opportunities to co-construct knowledge as there were hardly any situations in which neither student in a group provided a correct answer. We analyzed the effect size for improvement from individual to group scores for each CSEM item to understand the characteristics of these questions that led to productive group interaction. We also compared the group performance of the graduate students to the introductory physics students in a prior study using the CSEM to get insight into the concepts that showed differences for the two groups and those that were challenging for both groups of students before and after collaboration with peers. Our findings can motivate physics instructors to incorporate group interactions both inside and outside of the classroom even without instructor's involvement so that students at all levels can learn from each other and develop a functional understanding of the underlying concepts.2025-10-15T17:59:32ZEuropean Journal of Physics 45, 3 (2024): 035703Apekshya GhimireChandralekha Singh10.1088/1361-6404/ad336chttp://arxiv.org/abs/2211.00694v3What we talk about when we talk about physics problem solving2025-10-15T17:26:10ZI am a second-year cognitive science major, and as a student who has completed my physical science distribution requirements, I will likely never again encounter Gauss's law. So why do I feel that the time and effort I devoted to solving Gauss's law problems was worth it? Partly, I simply enjoy learning and the new perspective on the physical world that comes from understanding electromagnetism. But I was also fascinated by how physics problems train the mind in effective problem-solving strategies -- of course I was, being a cognitive science major! Two themes emerged as I reflected on this realization. First, physics problems serve as toy models for more complex problems outside of physics, cultivating broadly transferable problem-solving skills. Second, the process of solving physics problems invites reflection on our own cognitive and affective processes. These themes are deeply interconnected. A richer metacognitive understanding of our minds enables us to tackle more complex problems, while engaging with increasingly challenging problems, in turn, deepens our self-understanding. In what follows, Professor Zosia Krusberg and I consider nine general lessons offered by the physics problem-solving process.2022-11-01T18:39:06ZNoa PerlmutterZosia Krusberghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14755v2Reliable generation of isomorphic physics problems using Generative AI with prompt-chaining and tool use2025-10-15T15:13:01ZWe present a method for generating large numbers of isomorphic physics problems using generative AI services such as ChatGPT, through prompt chaining and tool use. This approach enables precise control over structural variations-such as numeric values and spatial relations-while supporting diverse contextual variations in the problem body. By utilizing the Python code interpreter, the method supports automatic solution validation and simple diagram generation, addressing key limitations in existing LLM-based methods. We generated two example isomorphic problem banks and compared the outcome against two simpler prompt-based approaches. Results show that prompt-chaining produces significantly higher quality and more consistent outputs than simpler, non-chaining prompts. We also show that GenAI services can be used to validate the quality of the generated isomorphic problems. This work demonstrates a promising method for efficient and scalable problem creation accessible to the average instructor, which opens new possibilities for personalized adaptive testing and automated content development.2025-08-20T14:58:05ZZhongzhou Chenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12024v1Becoming a physicist: Major educational transition points impact women's physics self-efficacy and sense of belonging2025-10-14T00:11:03ZIn this investigation, we analyzed individual interviews with six female undergraduate physics majors at a large, public, research university in the US to understand their progression at different transition points to becoming physicists. Following the frameworks of standpoint theory, Schlossberg's transition theory, and domains of power, we focused our analysis on how these women initially developed an interest in physics before coming to college and how important transition points in college impacted their physics self-efficacy and sense of belonging. We find that the transitions from high school to college introductory courses and then into the physics major were bottlenecks at which women faced new challenges. Our findings suggest that although women develop initial fascinations with physics in a myriad of unique and interesting ways, they tend to follow a similar trajectory that harms their physics self-efficacy and sense of belonging over time. Finally, although we focused on women who had persisted in pursuing a physics degree thus far, their accounts point to an unsupportive physics culture that could drive other women and students from marginalized demographic groups out of the discipline.2025-10-14T00:11:03Z37 pages, 1 figure, 1 tableSarah LindleyUniversity of PittsburghChandralekha SinghUniversity of Pittsburghhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11968v1When Support Hides Progress: Insights from a Physics Tutorial on Solving Laplace's Equation Using Separation of Variables in Cartesian Coordinates2025-10-13T22:01:14ZThe electrostatic potential in certain types of boundary value problems can be found by solving Laplace's Equation (LE). To develop students' ability for solving problems that can be solved effectively using Laplace's equation in an upper-level electricity and magnetism course, we developed and validated a tutorial focused on finding electrostatic potential in a Cartesian coordinate system. The tutorial was implemented across three instructors' classes, accompanied by scaffolded pretest and posttest. We also conducted think-aloud interviews with advanced students using both unscaffolded and scaffolded versions of the pretest and posttest. Findings reveal common student difficulties that were included in the tutorial as a guide to help address them. The difference in the performance of students from the pretest to the posttest was similar on the scaffolded version of the tests for all three instructors' classes and interviewed students. Equally importantly, interviewed students demonstrated greater differences in scores from the pretest and posttest on the unscaffolded versions, suggesting that the scaffolded version of the tests may have obscured evidence of actual learning from the tutorial. While a scaffolded test is typically intended to guide students through complex reasoning by breaking a problem into sub-problems and offering structured support, it can limit opportunities to demonstrate independent problem-solving and evidence of learning from the tutorial. Additionally, one instructor's class underperformed relative to others even on the pretest. This instructor had mentioned that the tests and tutorial were not relevant to their current course syllabus and offered a small amount of extra credit for attempting to help education researchers, highlighting how this type of instructor framing of instructional tasks can negatively impact student engagement and performance.2025-10-13T22:01:14ZEducation Sciences (2025). The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/doi/s1. 6 FiguresJaya Shivangani KashyapRobert DevatyChandralekha Singh10.3390/educsci15101345http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.11997v2Updating the Complex Systems Keyword Diagram Using Collective Feedback and Latest Literature Data2025-10-13T01:48:58ZThe complex systems keyword diagram generated by the author in 2010 has been used widely in a variety of educational and outreach purposes, but it definitely needs a major update and reorganization. This short paper reports our recent attempt to update the keyword diagram using information collected from the following multiple sources: (a) collective feedback posted on social media, (b) recent reference books on complex systems and network science, (c) online resources on complex systems, and (d) keyword search hits obtained using OpenAlex, an open-access bibliographic catalogue of scientific publications. The data (a), (b) and (c) were used to incorporate the research community's and other public communities' perceptions of the relevant topics, whereas the data (d) was used to obtain more objective measurements of the keywords' relevance and associations from publications made in complex systems science. Results revealed differences and overlaps between public perception and actual usage of keywords in publications on complex systems. Four topical communities were obtained from the keyword association network, although they were highly intertwined with each other. We hope that the resulting network visualization of complex systems keywords provides a more up-to-date, accurate topic map of the field of complex systems as of today.2025-09-15T14:45:59Z10 pages, 5 figures; accepted for publication in the proceedings of The 14th International Conference on Complex Networks and their Applications (Complex Networks 2025)Hiroki Sayama