https://arxiv.org/api/xueEg0sXraRNEpelURNqtfSUkHk 2026-06-10T01:45:15Z 4597 30 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19049v2 2026-05-20T04:48:17Z

Aggregation of Asian student data can reinforce the model minority myth by obscuring educational disparities among Asian student subgroups. This study investigated variation in conceptual physics knowledge across Asian racial and ethnic subgroups using data from the LASSO platform, analyzing responses from 16,810 students enrolled in 493 introductory calculus-based physics courses across 64 U.S. institutions. We applied Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy to examine predicted pre- and posttest performance on the Force Concept Inventory and Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. The findings revealed performance differences among 19 Asian subgroups that the Asian stratum (the single aggregated Asian group) concealed. Subgroup predicted means spanned 15.8 percentage points on the pretest and 15.4 percentage points on the posttest. The lowest-performing subgroup's posttest mean was roughly equal to the highest-performing subgroup's pretest mean, indicating a performance gap of about a full semester of instruction. Mean absolute error between the Asian Stratum and the 19-subgroup estimates was 3.3 percentage points at pretest and 3.6 percentage points at posttest, equivalent to approximately 4-5 weeks of learning in a 16-week course. These findings demonstrate that fine-grained identity data collection can support identifying disparities that common aggregation practices conceal.

2025-09-23T14:16:10Z Vy Le Grace Angell Jayson Nissen Ben Van Dusen http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20481v1 2026-05-19T20:42:59Z

A ball rolled over a shallow step will experience an increase in velocity along the direction perpendicular to the step. This causes a deflection in the ball's trajectory. In this paper we derive the equations that describe the motion of a ball rolled over a shallow step and present the results of our experimental test. This simple demonstration can be used in any classroom where the physics teacher has access to a ball and a stack of papers. Prior work has shown that a ball rolled over an edge can maintain its speed, as is commonly assumed, but it can also experience an increase or even decrease in speed. The ball can either roll without slipping while it is in contact with the edge, or else begin to slip before it leaves the edge. In this paper we will consider the case where the ball rolls without slipping the entire time it is in contact with the step edge, then contacts a lower platform. We work with shallow step heights relative to the radius of the ball so that the motion of the ball is easy to observe at all times, and so that the ball does not bounce when it encounters the lower platform. These shallow step heights mean that we can assume the ball does not slip as it moves over the edge.

2026-05-19T20:42:59Z Phys. Teach. 61 (2023) 477-480 Keith Zengel Laruen Boehnert 10.1119/5.0089423 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20094v1 2026-05-19T16:48:23Z

Most of the laws of Nature involve derivatives up to the second order. Ostrogradski was the first to seek a formulation of the equations of higher-order derivatives. He extended Hamilton's equations by considering Lagrangians that depend on higher-order derivatives of generalized coordinates. The Hamilton-Ostrogradski formulation served as the basis for later studies with higher-order derivatives. However, the Hamilton-Ostrogradski formalism is rarely discussed in textbooks or the pedagogical literature. This motivated us to show how the Hamilton-Ostrogradski formalism can be applied it to the Pais-Uhlenbeck oscillator. We hope that the approach presented in this work can serve as a basis for discussion in advanced classical mechanics courses.

2026-05-19T16:48:23Z Version with expanded references Cássius Anderson Miquele de Melo Ivan Francisco de Souza 10.1119/5.0284311 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19161v1 2026-05-18T22:26:16Z

As AI-generated problem sets gain traction in introductory physics courses, their technical correctness is well established - but the social assumptions embedded in their framing have gone largely unexamined. This study analyzes 600 introductory physics problems generated by four AI systems - Grok~4, GPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 3 Flash - across structured prompts involving occupations (CEO, Physicist, High School Teacher, Nurse, Construction Worker, and Migrant Worker). Problems were coded on five dimensions: hazard presence, hazard type, agency role, cognitive role, and object ownership. While the physics content is technically sound across all platforms, our analysis reveals systematic occupational stratification in narrative framing. Hazardous scenarios were concentrated in Migrant Worker and Construction Worker problems, with exposure-related hazards (electrocution, burns, radiation, heat or chemical exposure) especially concentrated in Migrant Worker problems. Passive-accident framing - the persona as the recipient of an injury - appeared in one in eight Migrant Worker problems and never appeared for the Physicist, Teacher, or CEO. Possessive ownership language was reserved almost exclusively for the CEO. These patterns suggest that AI-generated physics problems can introduce surface-level diversity while reproducing occupational hierarchies in who acts, who owns, and who is placed at risk. We discuss implications for physics teaching and offer simple screening strategies for instructors using AI-generated problems.

2026-05-18T22:26:16Z 5 pages, 5 figures Bilas Paul http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18384v1 2026-05-18T13:28:20Z

University extension activities play a fundamental role in bridging the gap between academia and society by fostering the socialization of scientific knowledge. This study reports and analyzes an outreach activity conducted in a public space, involving undergraduate students enrolled in Physics I, Physics III, and Physics IV courses within the Physics Teacher Education Program at the State University of the Tocantina Region of Maranhao (UEMASUL). The activity was developed through the design and presentation of didactic experiments using low-cost materials. Its main objectives were to disseminate fundamental physics concepts to the community, stimulate public interest in science, and provide pre-service teachers with a formative experience integrating theory, practice, and social responsibility. Data were collected from questionnaires adminisvelopment of communication skills, and the strengthening of the university's social role, while also fostering scientific curitered to visitors (n = 52). The results indicate that the activity significantly contributed to student learning, the deosity among participants.

2026-05-18T13:28:20Z Andre A. A. Marinho Gisele B. Freitas Camila B. C. da Silva http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18140v1 2026-05-18T09:47:35Z

Despite the widespread availability of large language models (LLMs) in higher education, instructors vary substantially in their adoption and use of these tools, and the reasons for this variation remain poorly understood. A mixed-methods survey of 90 STEM faculty in the Research Corporation for Science Advancement (RCSA) Cottrell community examined relationships between AI use, attitudes, institutional context, and instructional practice. Exploratory factor analysis identified a coherent construct, \textit{AI pedagogical orientation}, that strongly predicted self-reported AI use across research, teaching, and other professional activities. Qualitative analysis indicated that this construct reflected differing views about the role AI should play in disciplinary thinking, learning, and expertise development, rather than simply positive or negative attitudes toward AI. Institutional initiatives, demographic variables, and information sources showed comparatively weak associations with AI use. The results suggest that existing technology-adoption models may not fully explain adoption in contexts where technologies interact directly with disciplinary reasoning and knowledge production.

2026-05-18T09:47:35Z 15 pages, 6 figures Timothy J. Atherton Ian Descamps Tova R. Holmes Christina L. Vizcarra Ning Sui Max Webel Jay J. Foley http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23506v4 2026-05-14T10:47:57Z

Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are becoming important tools in physics research and education because they help in data analysis and complement traditional analytical methods. In this work, ANN modeling is introduced in a standard compound pendulum experiment used to determine the acceleration due to gravity, g. The aim is not to replace the conventional analytical method, but to demonstrate how machine learning can support experimental data analysis in undergraduate physics laboratories. Students first measure parameters such as effective length, time period, and angular displacement, and determine g using standard analytical methods with uncertainty analysis. These experimentally obtained data are then used to train and test an ANN model. The dataset is divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) groups. The experimentally determined value of gravitational acceleration was 1009.03 +/- 6.82 cm/s^2, while the ANN predicted a mean value of 1009.029858 cm/s^2 with a mean absolute error of 0.000592 cm/s^2. The close agreement between the experimental and ANN-predicted values shows that the ANN successfully learned the relationship between the pendulum parameters and g. However, the ANN prediction error should not be considered as an improvement in experimental accuracy because the model is trained using experimentally derived data. Instead, the ANN serves as a useful computational and educational tool that introduces students to regression, validation, overfitting, and data-driven analysis alongside traditional experimental physics.

2025-03-30T16:38:10Z 27 pages. 8 figures Saralasrita Mohanty Prabhu Prasad Tripathy Raja Das Sudakshina Prusty http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23976v1 2026-05-13T16:35:49Z

We present an adoption-ready instructional module for introducing quantum superposition in a two-state system. The package combines a five-activity classroom sequence with grading-ready assessment materials organized around six conceptual barriers documented in the physics education research literature: interpreting superposition as physical splitting, confusing coherent superposition with classical mixture, making basis-change errors, misreading finite-sample fluctuations as changes in the underlying state, using inconsistent notation, and, in an optional extension, reasoning about ordered operations. The main claim is that the bottleneck for introductory quantum instruction is rarely the absence of a usable simulator, but rather the absence of a coherent activity sequence, barrier-targeted prompts, and aligned assessment tools that an instructor can deploy without additional development work. We make the instructional rationale explicit through backward mapping from documented barriers to activity prompts and rubric-based evidence. The resulting module is designed for a single 50-minute class meeting and can be implemented with the included notebook or adapted to comparable two-state quantum simulators.

2026-05-13T16:35:49Z Boris Kiefer http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26056v3 2026-05-13T13:58:42Z

We propose a pedagogical, rationalized MKS-based convention for electromagnetic quantities designed to reduce cognitive load in undergraduate undergraduate electromagnetism. By setting vacuum constants to $\varepsilon_0 = μ_0 = 1/c$, we preserve the familiar structure of Maxwell's equations while making the role of the speed of light explicit. In this convention, electrical units are expressed directly in terms of mechanical units (e.g.\ $[\mathrm{nuA}] = \sqrt{\mathrm{J/s}}$), effectively reducing the number of independent base units. A striking pedagogical consequence is that electrical resistance becomes dimensionless, capacitance and inductance acquire units of time, and radiation pressure reduces to $|\mathbf{E}\times \mathbf{B}|$, greatly simplifying dimensional analysis for circuits and fields. We introduce corresponding non-SI units (\textit{nu}-units), provide conversion relations to SI, and demonstrate the potential utility of this system through comparative ``before/after'' derivations of the wave equation, electromagnetic energy density, radiation pressure, and the Bohr atom. Preliminary empirical support is provided by student attitude surveys administered to $N_1 = 46$ and $N_2 = 39$ students in an undergraduate physics course, which showed a statistically significant improvement in the perceived clarity of the wave equation derivation after exposure to the nu-system ($p = 0.005$, Mann--Whitney $U$ test), and a majority preference for the dimensionless-resistance feature.

2026-04-28T18:50:20Z Alisher Sanetullaev New Uzbekistan University http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12757v1 2026-05-12T21:11:13Z

Generative AI is rapidly reshaping STEM higher education. Not only are our educational practices changing, but how we think about educational transformation must adapt. Existing models of institutional change in STEM, aimed at interactive engagement, have largely followed an adoption logic: relatively stable, well-researched educational practices are evaluated and then scaled. These assumptions do not hold for generative AI, which is an arrival technology -- entering classrooms before a sufficient pedagogical evidence base could form. Building on recent decades of work on STEM institutional change, we propose a framework identifying six dimensions along which prior change models must be reconsidered in light of AI: three concerning the tools at the center of reform (the tool's evidence base, rate of change, and scope), and three concerning the people involved in change (faculty, change agents, and students). For each dimension, we examine how AI-era assumptions differ from those underlying prior interactive engagement reforms and derive design implications, including: privileging humble and local inquiries; organizing reform around pedagogical approaches rather than specific tools; repositioning change agents as facilitators of collective inquiry; and engaging students as partners in reform. Collectively, the six dimensions and design implications constitute a new framework for adapting change models to support institutions under conditions of genuine uncertainty. Finally, we illustrate how the framework may be applied through a brief case-study of a faculty workshop series carried out in a university physics department to support instructors adapting to this modern AI era.

2026-05-12T21:11:13Z David Perl-Nussbaum Noah D. Finkelstein http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12609v1 2026-05-12T18:01:39Z

Demographic data collection is essential in education research, as demographic data allows researchers to better describe the participant population they study and to contextualize findings. However, current research practices for neurodiversity demographics often rely on prescriptive methods (e.g., requiring participants to report official diagnoses) rather than allowing participants to self-identify. This approach can: a) not allow participants to express their intersecting identities in ways that are authentic; and b) limit trustworthiness and reliability of the data and interpretation. In addition, inconsistent dissemination and representation of demographic data across studies hinder the accessibility and usability of this work. Through a literature review of neurodivergent student experiences with learning and performing STEM, we identified widespread discrepancies in how demographic information is collected and reported. This paper explores how neurodivergent identities can be more accurately and inclusively represented in education research. We present findings of a thematic analysis on the ways neurodivergent demographic data collection is done in the literature using data from a systematic literature review on neurodivergent science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning and performance. We call on the PER community to contribute to the development of a framework that centers participant autonomy while supporting clarity, consistency, and future research use.

2026-05-12T18:01:39Z 8 pages, 2025 Physics Education Research Conference 2025 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, pp. 300-307 (2025) Mason D. Moenter George R. Keefe Liam G. E. McDermott Erin M. Scanlon 10.1119/perc.2025.pr.Moenter http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11568v1 2026-05-12T05:52:59Z

Perceptions of disciplinary recognition and identity can be shaped by various forms of feedback and experiences. Here we focus on the potential effects of course grades on the perceievd recognition and physics identity of students. We analyze patterns in changes in physics identity and perceived recognition from pre course to post course across three cohorts of university students enrolled in calculus-based Physics 1 (N=1,681). Students not receiving A grade, on average, showed declines in physics identity and perceived recognition. Even a B grade resulted in declines, and the declines were nonlinear across lower grades. Changes in perceived recognition fully mediated the changes in identity. Importantly, women showed significantly larger declines in identity and perceived recognition, compared to men, if they got less than A grade. The gender moderation was specifically localized to changes in perceived recognition, with no further gender effects on identity beyond the cascading effects on perceived recognition.

2026-05-12T05:52:59Z Jaya Shivangani Kashyap Christian D. Schunn Chandralekha Singh http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10868v1 2026-05-11T17:19:17Z

The Law of Universal Gravitation is part of middle and high school's general physics and astronomy curricula. This topic is included in the most popular physics textbooks available as a fact whose origin remains in the detailed work of Sir Isaac Newton 300 years ago. Consequently, its mathematical form is presented as an equation without any deductive process. Nevertheless, deduction of the mathematical form of this law is an opportunity to discuss how a deductive process can be performed using the data available on the Internet from reliable sources.

2026-05-11T17:19:17Z 5 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables Mauricio Mendivelso-Villaquirán http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09624v1 2026-05-10T16:11:01Z

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping education, scientific training, and materials discovery. In materials science, AI models increasingly support property prediction, experiment prioritization, and hypothesis generation; however, the limiting factor is no longer only algorithmic capability but also whether students and educators can use AI with domain-specific scientific judgment. This workshop-informed white paper and curriculum-oriented position article argues that AI education for AI-powered materials discovery must move beyond tool access and surface-level interaction with generative AI systems toward a workflow-aligned model of AI literacy. We connect AI literacy to materials-informatics competencies: data provenance, domain-specific featurization, model validation, uncertainty quantification, physics informed reasoning, reproducibility, and experimental feedback. We also emphasize outcome-oriented equity: institutions should evaluate not only access, participation, and engagement, but also whether AI-enabled instruction produces comparable learning gains, transfer of learning, confidence calibration, defined as the alignment with students confidence and the quality or correctness of their work, persistence, and research readiness across student subgroups. The paper synthesizes relevant evidence, identifies risks for learners such as cognitive off-loading and cognitive surrender, and provides a dual-track curriculum model and implementation recommendations such as curriculum guides and an assessment plan for courses, bootcamps, workshops, and program-level reform. The central goal is to prepare students to become better scientists, not merely more efficient users of AI tools.

2026-05-10T16:11:01Z 22 pages, 4 figures, and 5 tables Dongming Mei Katherine Moore Ben Sayler http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09602v1 2026-05-10T15:30:11Z

AI chatbots are increasingly used by students as study tools in physics, raising practical questions about their reliability on conceptual tasks. Existing evaluations of large language models (LLMs) on physics concept inventories rely almost exclusively on instruments that have been publicly available for years and likely appear in model training data, making it difficult to disentangle physics competence from familiarity with the test items themselves. We address this issue by evaluating three frontier LLMs (GPT-5.2, Gemini 3 Pro, Gemini 3 Flash) on the Classical Relativity Concept Inventory (CRCI), a recently developed and validated 21-item instrument on Galilean relativity that was not publicly available at the time of testing. Each item was administered 30 times per model, and all 1890 responses were qualitatively coded along three dimensions: visual interpretation, physics reasoning, and coordination. Mean accuracy was 97% for Gemini 3 Flash, 89% for Gemini 3 Pro, and 73% for GPT-5.2, compared to 62% for the student sample (N = 267). However, all three models fail completely on a small number of items. The qualitative analysis shows that these failures stem predominantly from misinterpretations of visual content rather than from deficits in physics knowledge, and that LLM errors differ structurally from those of students: when models err, they converge on a single distractor with high consistency, whereas student errors are more broadly distributed. These findings indicate that chatbot reliability on conceptual physics is item-dependent and unpredictable, with direct implications for how concept inventories are administered.

2026-05-10T15:30:11Z 19 pages,3 figures, 2 tables, supplementary material included Eugenio Tufino Caterina Giovanzana Andrea Zamboni Pasquale Onorato Stefano Oss